Upload
azidch
View
15
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
L9
Citation preview
1
MIT565702
WEEK 9INVENTORY (2)
2
Lecture Objectives
At the end of this lecture you should be able to:– Understand the need for cost-flow assumptions;
– Determine how ending inventory and cost of goods sold is determined under each cost-flow assumption;
– Apply each cost-flow assumption using the periodic and perpetual inventory methods; and
– Apply the lower of cost or market rule
3
ExampleXYZ Company had 1500 shirts on hand at 1 July 2011. These shirts had a cost of $8 each to purchase. Throughout the year it made the following purchases:
22 August 10 000 shirts at $13 each19 October 19 000 shirts at $10 each28 January 8 000 shirts at $12 each12 March 15 000 shirts at $15 each8 June 6 000 shirts at $13 each
A physical count revealed 3500 shirts on hand as at 30 June 2012
What are Cost-flow Assumptions?
4
10 000 @ $13
1500 @ $8
8000 @ $12 15000 @ $15
19 000 @ $10
6000 @ $13
Cost of goods sold56 000 @ $??
Ending inventory3500 @ $??
What are Cost-flow Assumptions?
5
Cost-flow Assumptions
• Split costs of opening inventory plus purchases into COGS and ending inventory
• Total dollar amount of goods available for sale:
• How the costs are divided between COGS and ending inventory impacts net profit and the inventory figure in the balance sheet
COGS Ending inventory
6
What are Cost-flow Assumptions?
How do we determine the value of ending inventory and COGS?– Track each individual items through the inventory flow (specific
identification) Accurate Based on physical flow of goods Time-consuming and expensive
– Technology is making specific identification easier (e.g. bar code technology)
– In cases where the costs of specific identification outweigh the benefits, cost-flow assumptions are a useful alternative
7
What Cost-flow Assumptions are Permitted in Australia?
• AASB 102 (IAS 2) Inventories permits the use of three cost formulas:– Specific identification;– First-in, first-out (FIFO); and– Weighted average
• A fourth approach, last-in, first-out (LIFO) is not permitted
8
Specific Identification
• Each unit sold and on hand can be identified by serial numbers or a specific purchase invoice
• Used when inventory items are not interchangeable• Small volume, high dollar value items
• Houses; motor vehicles; expensive jewellery
• Not possible or cost-effective for many entities
9
FIFO
• Assumes the first units acquired are the first units sold• Beginning inventory sold first and earliest purchases
thereafter
• Ending inventory, therefore, is assumed to consist of the most recently acquired units
• Tends to understate COGS and overstate ending inventory when cost price increases during the period
10
Weighted Average
Periodic Method Weighted average calculated as:
Total cost of goods available for sale for a period Total number units available for sale for a period
Perpetual Method Moving weighted average, where average price is recalculated after every purchase
11
LIFO
• Assumes last units acquired are the cost of first units sold
• Not permitted in Australia (AASB 102 Inventories para 25)
• It has been popular in the United States where it is allowed for tax purposes if used for accounting purposes but currently proposed for repeal
12
Perpetual vs. Periodic
Recall:– Perpetual method maintains a continuous record of
inventory and COGS– Periodic method calculates inventory and COGS once a
stocktake has occurred
Choosing the perpetual or periodic methods will influence COGS and closing inventory under some cost-flow assumptions
13
Example
* For specific identification purposes assume 100 units @ $2; 150 @ $3; 400 @ $4
Details Date Units Unit cost
Total cost
Units sold
Beginning I nventory
1/ 1/ 200 $2 $400
Purchased 15/ 1/ 300 $3 $900 Sold 17/ 1/ 250 Purchased 28/ 1/ 500 $4 $2 000 Sold 30/ 1/ 400 Total 1 000 $3 300 650*
14
PURCHASES COGS ENDING I NVENTORY
Date Units Unit cost
Total cost
Units Unit cost
Total cost
Units Unit cost
Total cost
1/ 1 200 2 400 15/ 1 300 3 900 200 2 400 300 3 900 17/ 1 100 2 200 100 2 200 150 3 450 150 3 450 28/ 1 500 4 2 000 100 2 200
150 500
3 4
450 2 000
30/ 1 400 4 1600 100 2 200 150
100 3 4
450 400
TOTAL 2 250 1 050
Specific identification(Perpetual Method)
15
Specific identification(Periodic Method)
Specific identification traces the movement of each unit of inventory
Implies the use of the perpetual inventory method, as continuous records are maintained
Specific identification not used in conjunction with the periodic method
16
PURCHASES COGS ENDI NG INVENTORY
Date Units Unit cost
Total cost
Units Unit cost
Total cost
Units Unit cost
Total cost
1/ 1 200 2 400 15/ 1 300 3 900 200 2 400 300 3 900 17/ 1 200 2 400 50 3 150 250 3 750 28/ 1 500 4 2 000 250 3 750 500 4 2 000 30/ 1 250 3 750 150 4 600 350 4 1 400 TOTAL 1 900 1 400
FIFO(Perpetual Method)
17
FIFO(Periodic Method)
Ending InventoryStocktake of 350 units (Assume 350 units @ $4) = $1 400
Cost of Goods Available for SaleCost of goods available for sale = $3 300
Cost of Goods Sold650 units sold @ $3 300 - $1 400 = $1 900(Assume 200 units @ $2 + 300 units @ $3 + 150 @ $4 = $1900)
18
Weighted Average(Perpetual Method)
Moving Weighted Average
PURCHASES COGS ENDING INV.
Date Units Unit cost
Total cost
Units Unit cost
Total cost
Units Unit cost
Total cost
1/ 1 200 2 400 15/ 1 300 3 900 * 500 2.60 1300 * $1 300 500 = 2.60 17/ 1 250 2.60 650 250 2.60 650 28/ 1 500 4 2 000 * 750 3.53 2 650 * $2 650 750 =$3.53 30/ 1 400 3.53 1 412 350 3.53 1 238 TOTAL 2 062 1 238
19
Weighted Average(Periodic Method)
Total cost of goods available for sale for a periodTotal number units available for sale for a period
$3 300 = $3.30/unit 1 000 Ending inventory 350 x $3.30 = $1 155
COGS 650 x $3.30 = $2 145
20
PURCHASES COGS ENDING STOCK/ INV.
Date Units Unitcost
Totalcost
Units Unitcost
Totalcost
Units Unitcost
Totalcost
1/ 1 200 2 40015/ 1 300 3 900 200 2 400
300 3 90017/ 1 200 2 400
250 3 750 50 3 15028/ 1 500 4 2 000 200 2 400
50 3 150500 4 2000
30/ 1 200 2 40050 3 150
400 4 1 600 100 4 400TOTAL 2 350 950
LIFO(Perpetual Method)
21
LIFO(Periodic Method)
Ending InventoryStocktake of 350 units (Assume 200 units @ $2 + 150 units @ $3) = $850
Cost of Goods Available for SaleCost of goods available for sale = $3 300
Cost of Goods Sold650 units sold @ $3 300 - $850 = $2 450(Assume 500 units @ $4 + 150 units @ $3 = $2 450)
22
Comparison
Assume selling price is $10 per item;
Sold 650 units x $10 = $6500;
Operating expenses $50; and
Assume there are no stock losses
23
PERI ODIC PERPETUAL
FIFO LIFO Weighted
average Spec Id FIFO LIFO Moving average
SALES 6 500 6 500 6 500 6 500 6 500 6 500 6 500 Less COGS 1 900 2 450 2 145 2 250 1 900 2 350 2 062 Gross profit 4 600 4 050 4 355 4 250 4 600 4 150 4 438
Less expenses 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Net profit 4 550 4 000 4 305 4 200 4 550 4 100 4 388 Ending inventory 1 400 850 1 155 1 050 1 400 950 1 238
24
Comparison
In periods of rising prices: FIFO results in the highest ending inventory, highest
gross profit, highest net profit and the lowest COGS
LIFO results in lowest ending inventory, lowest gross profit, lowest net profit and the highest COGS
Weighted average and specific identification results fall between FIFO and LIFO
25
Student Task
Have a go at practice problem 1a b and c on Pg 145-6 of the study guide for discussion in 30 minutes.
Note. In part B prepare stock cards for the FIFO, LIFO and Moving Weighted Average assumptions
26
Workings – Periodic MethodDate Particulars DR CR
27
Workings – Periodic MethodDate Particulars DR CR
28
Income Statement (Periodic)
Income statement for the year ended 30 June
29
DATE IN OUT BALANCE
Stock Card - FIFO
30
DATE IN OUT BALANCE
Stock Card - LIFO
31
DATE IN OUT BALANCE
Stock Card – MOVING WEIGHTED AVERAGE
32
Workings – Perpetual MethodDate Particulars DR CR
33
Workings – Perpetual MethodDate Particulars DR CR
34
Workings – Perpetual MethodDate Particulars DR CR
35
Workings – Perpetual MethodDate Particulars DR CR
36
Income Statement (Perpetual)
Income statement for the year ended 30 June
37
What is the Lower of Cost or Market Rule?
• Instances arise when the market price of inventory is less than the cost price• Obsolescence (perishables past their ‘use by’ date; audio
cassette players)• Damage (damaged goods basket at supermarket) • Demand (‘summer clearance sale’)
• In accordance with the principle of conservatism, this decrease in asset value is to be recognised when it occurs
• This is known as the lower of cost or market rule
38
Lower of Cost or Market Rule
• AASB 102 (IAS 2) Inventories states inventory is to be valued at the lower of cost or net realisable value on an item by item basis• If not practicable, may group similar or related items
• Net realisable value is the net amount expected to be realised from the sale of inventory• Selling price less costs incurred to make the sale
• This is the value of inventory as it appears in the balance sheet
39
I tem no. Units Unit cost
Total Cost
Units Market Price
Total Market Price
Lower of Cost or Market
675 5 x $ 50 = $ 250 5 x $45 = $225 $225 732 10 x $ 40 = $400 10 x $48 = $480 $400 957 15 x $ 55 = $ 825 15 x $30 = $450 $450 977 8 x $ 10 = $ 80 8 x $15 = $120 $ 80
Total 1 555 $1 275 1 155
Example
40
Student Task
What would be the general journal entry from the previous example to record the lower of cost or
market rule?
41
Workings
GENERAL JOURNALDate Particulars DR CR
42
Lecture Outcomes
You should now be able to:– Understand the need for cost-flow assumptions;
– Determine how ending inventory and cost of goods sold is determined under each cost-flow assumption;
– Apply each cost-flow assumption using the periodic and perpetual inventory methods; and
– Apply the lower of cost or market rule
43
Homework – This Week
Questions from Required Exercises?
44
Homework – Next WeekCase Discussion 1
E. Knight (2001), ‘Inventiveness in inventories’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 9 August, p. 21 (Business).
Issues to consider:• How was the value of inventory determined?• How was this used to manipulate profits?
45
Homework – Next WeekCase Discussion 2
L. Gettler (2005), ‘One-offs uncork the red for Evans & Tate’, The Age, 14 September, p. 2 (Business)
Issues to consider:• Why was the inventory write-down necessary?• Why were the corporate overheads expensed rather
than capitalised?
46
Homework – Next Week
Required Exercises P8.2, P8.7, P8.12
Chapter 13 of textbook