Upload
jp30ptt7
View
223
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ACF
Citation preview
Seminar 8Financial Analysis
Analysis Implementation
Dr. Chen Chen
Email: [email protected]
Presentation title 1
2
Valuation Flow Chart
Presentation title
Accounting analysis ValuationFinancial Analysis
ForecastAccounting analysis
Corporate governance analysis
Economic analysisBusiness strategy analysisIndustry analysis
Financial analysis
Valuation
Business and Industry analysis
3
Financial Analysis
Presentation title
Financial analysis includes:
– Ratio analysis– Cash flow analysis
Value of a firm is determined by (1) profitability and (2) growth.
Financial analysis of past years provides a benchmark for forecasting growth and profitability.
• Hence the importance of historical data (financial statements) and the reliability of these statements for forecasting purposes.
4
Financial Analysis
– Ratio analysis – to assess how various line items in financial statements relate to each other and to measure relative performance
– Cash flow analysis – to evaluate liquidity and the management of operating, investing, and financing activities as they relate to cash flow
5Presentation title
Financial Analysis
Profitability and growth are influenced by a firm’s:
1. Product market strategies which are implemented via:
- Competitive strategy
- Operating policies
- Investment decisions
2. Financial market strategies which are implemented via:
- Financing policies
- Dividend policies
6Presentation title
Financial Analysis
Hence, the following decisions can influence profitability and growth of a company:
– Operating management decisions
– Investment management decisions
– Financing strategy decisions
7
Drivers of an Organization’s Profitability and Growth
8
Ratio Analysis
• Evaluating ratios requires comparison against some benchmark. Such benchmarks include:
– Ratios over time from prior periods (time series)– Ratios of other firms in the industry (cross-sectional)– Some absolute benchmark (e.g., industry norm)– Common size analysis (common size statements)
• Effective ratio analysis must attempt to relate underlying business factors to the financial numbers
9
Time-series Analysis
• Time-series analysis refers to the analysis of one ratio (e.g.ROE) for one firm, over time.
– Forecasting future profitability
• The model can take the following form:
ROEi,t+1 = α + βROEi,t + eit
• The estimate of the coefficient β will indicate the persistence of ROE over a time period.
10
Limitation of time-series analysis
– The problem with this type of analysis is that it might include the effects of structural or economic changes
– However, the mean reverting property of ROE or the random walk property of earnings are important factors to be considered in forecasting
11
Limitation of time-series analysis
12
Cross-sectional Analysis
Cross-sectional analysis refers to the analysis of a ratio (e.g.ROE) in one period for all firms, preferably from the same industry
Overcomes some of the problems associated with time-series analysis
Enables comparison of the ratio of the company with the industry average
– For example, in terms of profitability, want company-specific ratio to exceed industry average
If not publicly available, you must calculate the industry norm
13
Categories of Financial Ratios (Key Performance Indicators-KPIs)
Profitability ratios
Asset management ratios
Debt and safety ratios
Cash flow ratios
14
Profitability Analysis
There are different types of profitability ratios
Important profitability ratios are:
– ROE = NPAT before abnormal / (shareholders equity - outside equity interests).
– ROA = [Net Income + Interest Expense*(1-Corporate Tax Rate)]/[Total Assets - Outside Equity Interests].
– EBITDA margin = EBITDA / operating revenue.
– Net profit margin = NPAT before abnormal / operating revenue
15
ROE Characteristics
• ROE indicates how much return you have generated using the equity capital invested by shareholders in your company
• Evidence exists that, on average, long run ROE is between 11-13% (for large Australian firms)
– That is, firms with larger or smaller ROE will overtime tend to revert to the range of 11-13%
• “Mean-reverting”
• What would be the forecast of ROE for the next 5 years of a company that experienced 5 years (historical data) of high (say, 30%) ROE?
– Theoretically, ROE must revert to the mean within the forecast period
16
ROE-Mean Reversion
17
ROE-Mean Reversion
ASX Code Company Name Industry
EBIT Margin
EBITDA Margin ROE ROA
NOPLAT Margin
Financial Leverage
Price/Book Value
ANZAustralia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd Bank -- -- 14.74% 0.95% -- -- 1.78
CBACommonwealth Bank of Australia Bank -- -- 16.91% 0.92% -- -- 2.14
NAB National Australia Bank Limited Bank -- -- 11.76% 0.67% -- -- 1.39
WBC Westpac Banking Corporation Bank -- -- 15.42% 0.95% -- -- 1.82
BHP BHP Billiton Limited Iron ore/coal mining 37.44% 46.43% 25.70% 14.70% 24.84% 180.12% 3.64
FMG Fortescue Metals Group Ltd Iron ore mining 34.67% 39.35% 51.57% 19.56% 33.51% 359.16% 7.39
MCC Macarthur Coal Limited Coal Mining 25.98% 26.02% 11.29% 8.68% 18.79% 138.85% 2.73
RIO Rio Tinto Limited Iron ore/coal mining 37.00% 37.52% 24.04% 13.81% 27.75% 172.20% 2.61
CGJ Coles Group Limited Grocery retail 3.25% 4.81% 19.53% 8.83% 2.51% 248.83% 4.45
MTS Metcash Limited Grocery wholesale 3.54% 3.94% 18.58% 8.24% 2.66% 264.16% 2.26
TRS The Reject Shop Limited Discount warehouse 6.95% 8.81% 45.30% 18.14% 5.15% 259.83% 7.91WOW Woolworths Limited Grocery/household retail 5.96% 7.50% 26.69% 11.99% 4.44% 236.48% 4.26
ROE-Comparisons of large Australian Firms
19Presentation title
ROE-BP
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders
3,780 23,451 11,582 25,700 (3,719)
Total BP shareholders' equity
111,441 129,302 118,414 111,465 94,987
Ratio
ROE1 3.39% 18.14% 9.78% 23.06% -3.92%
Benchmarks
ROE, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 12.41% 14.37% 19.18% 22.16% 18.10%
ConocoPhillips 13.23% 17.58% 17.56% 19.07% 16.57%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 18.65% 18.72% 27.06% 26.59% 20.74%
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
8.65% 9.09% 14.11% 18.24% 13.60%
ROE, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas 11.63% 15.04% 17.90% 22.03% 13.71%
ROE, Industry
Oil & Gas 10.17% 14.33% 16.39% 20.05% 12.76%
Decomposing Profitability: Traditional Approach
ROE = ROA x Financial leverage
= Net Income – Preference Divs * Ave. Assets
Ave. Assets Ave. Common shareholders’ Equity
ROA = Profit Margin x Asset Turnover
= Net Income – Preference Divs * Sales
Sales Ave. Assets
ROE= Profit Margin x Asset Turnover x Financial leverage
21Presentation title
Decomposing Profitability: DuPont Approach
Profitability Ratio ROE
Profitability Ratio ROA
Debt and Safety Ratio: Financial
LeverageAsset Management Ratio: Asset Turnover
Other Debt and Safety Ratios
Dividend Payout Ratio
Other Asset Management Ratios
Profitability Ratio: Profit Margin
Other Margins
22Presentation title
Trade-off between Profit Margin and Asset Turnover
• There is always a trade-off between profit margin and asset turnover.
23Presentation title
More Leverage?
ROE= Profit Margin x Asset Turnover x Financial leverage
More Leverage?
Decomposing Profitability: Advanced DuPont Approach
An alternative approach focuses on the effects of leverage
– A. Financial Leverage– B. Operating Liability Leverage
Decomposing Profitability: Advanced DuPont Approach
Decomposing Profitability: Advanced DuPont Approach
ROE is ultimately being equal to:
– RNOA (Return on Net Operating Assets) = Operating Income (After tax) / Net Operating Assets
– FLEV (Financial Leverage) = Net Financial Obligation (Liability) / Equity – NBC(Net Borrowing Cost) = Net Interest Expenses (after tax) / Net Financial Obligation– SPREAD (Financial Spread)= RNOA – NBC– ROOA = (Operating Income +Implicit Interest (after tax))/Operating Assets – OLLEV (Operating liability leverage)=Operating Liabilities/Operating Assets – OLSPREAD (Operating liability spread)=ROOA-Short-term Borrowing Rate (after tax)
]NBC -RNOA x [FLEVRNOA ROE
Spread
RNOA = ROOA + (OLLEV x OLSPREAD)
When the effective interest rate after tax is larger than operating
ROA, Spread will be negative as will Spread*Net Financial
Leverage
– Results in a reduction in ROE
Spread is the incremental economic effect of introducing debt
into the capital structure
– Spread will be positive provided the effective interest rate
after tax is less than operating ROA
Decomposing Profitability: Advanced DuPont Approach
Benchmark for profitability analysis -ROE and Cost of Equity Capital
• To interpret ROE, comparison with firms’ cost of equity capital is most
appropriate
– ROE is the return to equity holders (shareholders) and thus it is best
to be compared against the cost of equity capital
• The advantage is that this measure is determined by the market and can
not be influenced by management
• Calculation of cost of equity capital considered in week 10
28th February 2011
Presentation title 28
Benchmark for profitability analysis - ROA and WACC
• ROA is the return on assets which have been financed by both the equity capital and debt holders
– ROA is best to be compared against the weighted average cost of debt and equity (WACC, weighted average cost of capital)
• Calculation of WACC considered in week 10
30Presentation title
ROE vs. ROA
Theoretically, ROE will be higher than ROA
– The benchmark for ROA in Australia is in the range of 8-10%
Recall, ROE tends to revert to a mean in the range of 11-13%:
– As such, firms’ cost of equity capital should be higher than their WACC
31Presentation title
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders
3,780 23,451 11,582 25,700 (3,719)
Total assets 284,305 305,690 300,193 293,068 272,262
Ratio
ROA1 1.33% 7.67% 3.86% 8.77% -1.37%
Benchmarks
ROA, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 7.23% 8.44% 11.24% 12.84% 10.30%
ConocoPhillips 5.89% 7.76% 7.19% 8.12% 7.27%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 9.30% 9.39% 13.45% 12.40% 10.07%
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
4.21% 4.58% 7.38% 8.96% 6.24%
ROA, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas 5.64% 7.45% 8.75% 10.29% 6.24%
ROA, Industry
Oil & Gas 4.93% 7.02% 7.97% 9.53% 5.98%
ROA-BP
32Presentation title
Assessing Operating Management:Income Statement Ratios
• Common-sized income statements facilitate comparisons of key line items across time and different firms
• Additionally, the following ratios are also helpful:– Gross profit margin– EBIT margin– EBITDA margin (EBIT also before depreciation &
amortisation)
33Presentation title
Gross Profit Margin
• Measures the profitability of sales, less direct costs of sales:Gross profit margin = Sales – Cost of sales Sales
The gross profit margin is an indicator of:– The price premium that a firm’s product commands in the
market– The efficiency of a firm’s procurement and/or production
process
34Presentation title
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Gross profit 44,286 53,258 48,427 65,754 16,281
Sales and other operating revenues
353,568 379,136 375,580 375,517 297,107
Ratio
Gross profit margin1 12.53% 14.05% 12.89% 17.51% 5.48%
Benchmarks
Gross Profit Margin, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 23.62% 23.77% 25.69% 26.48% 27.22%
ConocoPhillips 40.96% 45.08% 44.75% 13.98% 15.50%
Exxon Mobil Corp. 24.85% 25.08% 25.83% 27.13% 29.13%
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
15.15% 15.44% 15.23% 15.67% 16.42%
Gross Profit Margin-BP
35Presentation title
EBIT and EBITDA Margins
• The EBIT margin provides a comprehensive measure of operations:
EBIT margin = EBIT Sales
• The EBITDA margin eliminates the significant non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization along with interest and taxes:
EBITDA =Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization Sales
36Presentation title
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders
3,780 23,451 11,582 25,700 (3,719)
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
223 307 234 397 395
Add: Income tax expense
947 6,463 6,993 12,737 (1,501)
Earnings before tax (EBT)
4,950 30,221 18,809 38,834 (4,825)
Add: Finance costs 1,148 1,068 1,125 1,246 1,170
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT)
6,098 31,289 19,934 40,080 (3,655)
Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortization
15,163 13,510 12,481 11,135 11,164
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
21,261 44,799 32,415 51,215 7,509
EBIT and EBITDA-BP
Oil and Gas Industry: EBITDA margin comparison
Asset management ratios
Asset management is a key indicator of how effective a firm’s management is.
Asset turnover may be broken into two primary components:
1. Working capital management2. Long-term asset management
Working Capital Management
• Working capital is the difference between current assets and current liabilities.
• Operating working capital is defined as (Current assets - cash) - (current liabilities - short term debt).
• Key ratios useful for analyzing the management of working capital include:• Working capital turnover = Operating revenue / operating working capital.• Working capital to revenue = Operating working capital / operating revenue. • Inventory turnover = Operating revenue / current inventory.• Day’s payable = (Creditors / operating revenue) * # days in financial year.• Day’s receivables = (Debtors / operating revenue) * # days in financial year• Day’s inventory = (Current inventory / operating revenue) * # days in financial
year
Inventory Turnover-BP
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Cost of operating revenues 309,282 325,878 327,153 309,763 280,826
Inventories 18,373 29,231 27,867 25,661 26,218
Ratio
Inventory turnover1 16.83 11.15 11.74 12.07 10.71
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 22.28 24.97 26.58 30.95 24.70
ConocoPhillips 23.30 25.03 33.19 42.46 28.17
Exxon Mobil Corp. 16.00 17.64 20.88 20.42 18.01
Royal Dutch Shell PLC 18.14 12.72 12.87 13.68 10.48
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas 17.73 14.24 15.22 17.30 13.94
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Oil & Gas 16.41 13.95 14.60 16.87 13.67
41Presentation title
Receivable Turnover-BP
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Sales and other operating revenues
353,568 379,136 375,580 375,517 297,107
Trade receivables 19,671 28,868 25,977 27,929 24,255
Ratio
Receivables turnover1
17.97 13.13 14.46 13.45 12.25
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 11.98 10.18 10.98 11.21 9.55
ConocoPhillips 7.87 6.58 6.49 16.71 13.74
Exxon Mobil Corp. 21.26 16.19 15.97 15.54 14.55
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
14.83 11.54 11.62 9.73 9.83
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas
15.79 12.32 12.73 12.63 11.69
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Oil & Gas 13.59 11.20 11.56 11.87 10.86
Long-term Assets Management
Invested capital turnover = Operating revenue / operating invested capital before goodwill.
Long term asset turnover = Operating revenue / non current assets
PPE turnover = Operating revenue / (property, plant & equipment - accumulated depreciation).
43Presentation title
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Sales and other operating revenues
353,568 379,136 375,580 375,517 297,107
Property, plant and equipment
130,692 133,690 120,448 119,214 110,163
Ratio
Net fixed asset turnover1
2.71 2.84 3.12 3.15 2.70
Benchmarks
Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 1.09 1.34 1.63 1.99 1.90
ConocoPhillips 0.70 0.75 0.86 2.91 2.29
Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.56 1.73 2.00 2.18 1.85
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
2.19 2.35 2.71 3.09 2.58
Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas 1.70 1.89 2.18 2.60 2.23
Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Industry
Oil & Gas 1.64 1.77 1.99 2.39 2.04
Fixed Asset Turnover-BP
44Presentation title
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Sales and other operating revenues
353,568 379,136 375,580 375,517 297,107
Total BP shareholders' equity
111,441 129,302 118,414 111,465 94,987
Ratio
Equity turnover1 3.17 2.93 3.17 3.37 3.13
Benchmarks
Equity Turnover, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 1.29 1.48 1.69 2.01 1.89
ConocoPhillips 1.01 1.04 1.21 3.75 2.76
Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.26 2.42 2.73 3.02 2.52
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
2.45 2.51 2.48 2.77 2.49
Equity Turnover, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas
2.14 2.23 2.41 2.90 2.53
Equity Turnover, Industry
Oil & Gas 1.98 2.07 2.22 2.66 2.28
Equity Turnover-BP
Debt and safety ratios (financial leverage analysis)
• Borrowing allows a firm to access to capital, but increases the risk of ownership for equity holders
• Analysis of leverage can be performed on both short- and long-term debts:
– Liquidity analysis relates to evaluating current liabilities– Solvency analysis relates to longer term liabilities
Liquidity analysis
• There are several ratios useful to evaluate a firm’s liquidity, including:
– Current ratio– Quick ratio– Cash ratio– Operating cash flow ratio
• Each of these ratios attempts to measure the ability of a firm to pay its current obligations
Liquidity analysis
Knowing how the liquidity ratios are calculated allows the user to understand how to interpret them:
Current ratio = Current assets Current liabilities
Quick ratio = Cash + Short-term investments + Accts. receivable Current liabilities
Cash ratio = Cash + Marketable securities Current liabilities
Operating cash flow ratio = Cash flows from operations Current liabilities
48Presentation title
Current Ratio-BP
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Current assets 87,262 96,840 110,981 97,584 96,853
Current liabilities 63,615 72,812 77,586 84,318 83,879
Ratio
Current ratio1 1.37 1.33 1.43 1.16 1.15
Benchmarks
Current Ratio, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 1.32 1.52 1.63 1.58 1.68
ConocoPhillips 1.31 1.26 1.38 1.08 1.26
Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.82 0.83 1.01 0.94 0.94
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
1.16 1.11 1.18 1.17 1.12
Current Ratio, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas 1.15 1.15 1.27 1.15 1.16
Current Ratio, Industry
Oil & Gas 1.25 1.24 1.34 1.20 1.22
49Presentation title
Quick Ratio-BP
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Loans 333 216 247 244 247 Trade receivables 19,671 28,868 25,977 27,929 24,255 Other receivables 11,367 10,963 11,687 15,597 12,294 Other investments 329 467 319 288 1,532 Cash and cash equivalents
29,763 22,520 19,548 14,067 18,556
Total quick assets 61,463 63,034 57,778 58,125 56,884
Current liabilities 63,615 72,812 77,586 84,318 83,879
Ratio
Quick ratio1 0.97 0.87 0.74 0.69 0.68
Benchmarks
Quick Ratio, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 0.94 1.16 1.25 1.25 1.30ConocoPhillips 1.03 0.99 0.78 0.82 1.00Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.51 0.53 0.70 0.67 0.65
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
0.72 0.64 0.74 0.69 0.60
Quick Ratio, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas 0.77 0.75 0.79 0.75 0.73
Quick Ratio, Industry
Oil & Gas 0.85 0.83 0.85 0.80 0.78
50Presentation title
Cash Ratio-BP
Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)
Other investments 329 467 319 288 1,532 Cash and cash equivalents
29,763 22,520 19,548 14,067 18,556
Total cash assets 30,092 22,987 19,867 14,355 20,088
Current liabilities 63,615 72,812 77,586 84,318 83,879
Ratio
Cash ratio1 0.47 0.32 0.26 0.17 0.24
Benchmarks
Cash Ratio, Competitors
Chevron Corp. 0.41 0.50 0.64 0.60 0.59ConocoPhillips 0.44 0.43 0.25 0.23 0.42Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.17 0.13
Royal Dutch Shell PLC
0.25 0.10 0.19 0.11 0.13
Cash Ratio, Sector
Integrated Oil & Gas
0.29 0.21 0.26 0.20 0.23
Cash Ratio, Industry
Oil & Gas 0.34 0.26 0.27 0.22 0.25
Debt and Safety Ratios
• Beyond short-term survival, solvency measures the ability of a firm to meet long-term obligations
• Several useful ratios are used to analyse solvency. Three using only shareholders’ equity as a denominator are:
• Financial leverage = Total assets / shareholders equity
• Gross gearing = (Short term debt + long term debt) / shareholders equity
• Net gearing = (Short term debt + long term debt - cash) / shareholders equity
Sustainable Growth Ratio
• A comprehensive measure of a firm’s ratios is the sustainable growth rate, which uses ROE:
ROE * (1 - Dividend payout ratio)
Where:Dividend payout ratio = Cash dividends paid
Net income
• Sustainable growth rate measures the ability of a firm to maintain its profitability and financial policies
Sustainable Growth Ratio
Cash Flow Analysis
• Cash flow analysis can provide further insights into operating, investing and financing activities
• The analysis focuses on the financial ability of a company to pay the outgoings according to a priority list
• 1. Interest payments• 2. Repayment of loans• 3. Capital expenditures• 4. Dividend payments
Cash Flow Analysis
– Note that interest expense and dividends paid are related to financing activities.
– Interest income and dividends received are related to investing activities.
– That is, for our purposes, these items should not be included in the operating activities of a company.
Cash Flow Analysis
– So, the first task in cash flow analysis is to rearrange the classifications in the cash flow statement , if required.
– That is, operating cash flow section should include only operating activities.
– Add back interest and dividends paid, to the operating cash flow.
– Deduct interest and dividend received, from operating cash flows.
– Cash flow analysis starts by looking at cash flow from operations and comparing it with NPAT
Cash Flow Analysis
Is there sufficient operating cash flows to meet interest payments?
• If yes, how many times?• If no, the company is in trouble!
Is there sufficient operating cash flows after interest payments to pay cash dividends?
• If yes, how many times?• If no, how does this affect share prices?
• Should the company borrow to pay dividends?
Is there sufficient cash flows to repay loan principal?• Is it feasible to borrow to do so?
• What is the interest rate on the new borrowings?
Is there sufficient cash flows to expand?• Is it a good idea to use our own funds to expand?
Financial Statement Analysis and Public Debt
Debt ratings provide important information to investors (Moody’s
and S&P)
The meaning of debt ratings:
• Standard & Poor’s has a rating system from D to AAA that
grades the relative riskiness of debt
• Debt ratings influence the yield that debt instruments must pay
for investors to buy them.
Table 10.2: Debt Ratings - Example
Table 10.3: Median Financial Ratios by Debt Ratings Category
Financial Analysis and Public Debt
Factors that drive debt ratings:
• Performance measures are used to gauge the expected future health of
the firm and the ability to repay debt.
• Credit analysis (debt and safety ratio)
Factors Used in Quantitative Models of Debt Ratings
Prediction of Distress and Turnaround
Models for distress prediction• Debt of distressed companies present investment opportunities because they trade at steep
discounts. (e.g. Australian Vintage, Photon Group)
• Financials can be analyzed to predict distress (e.g. Allied Brands)
• Several models to predict distress have been developed over the years. One of the more popular and robust models is the Altman’s Z-score model:
Altman z-score
The Altman z-score is a measure of a company financial strength that uses a weighted sum of several factors.
Distress zone will differ across industries and types of companies
Zones of Discrimination:
Z > 2.99 -“Safe” Zones
1.81 < Z < 2.99 -“Grey” Zones
Z < 1.81 -“Distress” Zones
Your Project
Section
F
Financial
Analysis
5 500
Profitability
analysis
Many of the ratios are available in Osiris. Identify the more important ones.
Merely stating the ratios will not fetch marks. A brief discussion on key ratios is
required. Comparison against peer and industry is important (both time series
and cross sectional).
1 100
Asset
management
analysis
Many of the ratios are available in Osiris. Identify the more important ones.
Merely stating the ratios will not fetch marks. A brief discussion on key ratios is
required. Comparison against peer and industry is important (both time series
and cross sectional).
1 100
Debt and safety
analysis
Many of the ratios are available in Osiris. Identify the more important ones.
Merely stating the ratios will not fetch marks. A brief discussion on key ratios is
required. Comparison against peer and industry is important (both time series
and cross sectional).
1 100
Cash Flow
Analysis
Many of the cash flow ratios are available in database. Identify the more
important ones. A brief discussion on the company’s cash flow position is
required. Comparison against peer and industry is important (both time series
and cross sectional).
1 100
Credit analysis Include credit ratings for your company from credit rating agencies (if any).
Conduct the distress analysis and measure Altman’s Z score across two recent
years.
1 100
65
Next week
Forecasting