66
Seminar 8 Financial Analysis Analysis Implementation Dr. Chen Chen Email: [email protected] Presentation title 1

Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ACF

Citation preview

Page 1: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Seminar 8Financial Analysis

Analysis Implementation

Dr. Chen Chen

Email: [email protected]

Presentation title 1

Page 2: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

2

Valuation Flow Chart

Presentation title

Accounting analysis ValuationFinancial Analysis

ForecastAccounting analysis

Corporate governance analysis

Economic analysisBusiness strategy analysisIndustry analysis

Financial analysis

Valuation

Business and Industry analysis

Page 3: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

3

Financial Analysis

Presentation title

Financial analysis includes:

– Ratio analysis– Cash flow analysis

Value of a firm is determined by (1) profitability and (2) growth.

Financial analysis of past years provides a benchmark for forecasting growth and profitability.

• Hence the importance of historical data (financial statements) and the reliability of these statements for forecasting purposes.

Page 4: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

4

Financial Analysis

– Ratio analysis – to assess how various line items in financial statements relate to each other and to measure relative performance

– Cash flow analysis – to evaluate liquidity and the management of operating, investing, and financing activities as they relate to cash flow

Page 5: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

5Presentation title

Financial Analysis

Profitability and growth are influenced by a firm’s:

1. Product market strategies which are implemented via:

- Competitive strategy

- Operating policies

- Investment decisions

2. Financial market strategies which are implemented via:

- Financing policies

- Dividend policies

Page 6: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

6Presentation title

Financial Analysis

Hence, the following decisions can influence profitability and growth of a company:

– Operating management decisions

– Investment management decisions

– Financing strategy decisions

Page 7: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

7

Drivers of an Organization’s Profitability and Growth

Page 8: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

8

Ratio Analysis

• Evaluating ratios requires comparison against some benchmark. Such benchmarks include:

– Ratios over time from prior periods (time series)– Ratios of other firms in the industry (cross-sectional)– Some absolute benchmark (e.g., industry norm)– Common size analysis (common size statements)

• Effective ratio analysis must attempt to relate underlying business factors to the financial numbers

Page 9: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

9

Time-series Analysis

• Time-series analysis refers to the analysis of one ratio (e.g.ROE) for one firm, over time.

– Forecasting future profitability

• The model can take the following form:

ROEi,t+1 = α + βROEi,t + eit

• The estimate of the coefficient β will indicate the persistence of ROE over a time period.

Page 10: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

10

Limitation of time-series analysis

– The problem with this type of analysis is that it might include the effects of structural or economic changes

– However, the mean reverting property of ROE or the random walk property of earnings are important factors to be considered in forecasting

Page 11: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

11

Limitation of time-series analysis

Page 12: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

12

Cross-sectional Analysis

Cross-sectional analysis refers to the analysis of a ratio (e.g.ROE) in one period for all firms, preferably from the same industry

Overcomes some of the problems associated with time-series analysis

Enables comparison of the ratio of the company with the industry average

– For example, in terms of profitability, want company-specific ratio to exceed industry average

If not publicly available, you must calculate the industry norm

Page 13: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

13

Categories of Financial Ratios (Key Performance Indicators-KPIs)

Profitability ratios

Asset management ratios

Debt and safety ratios

Cash flow ratios

Page 14: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

14

Profitability Analysis

There are different types of profitability ratios

Important profitability ratios are:

– ROE = NPAT before abnormal / (shareholders equity - outside equity interests).

– ROA = [Net Income + Interest Expense*(1-Corporate Tax Rate)]/[Total Assets - Outside Equity Interests].

– EBITDA margin = EBITDA / operating revenue.

– Net profit margin = NPAT before abnormal / operating revenue

Page 15: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

15

ROE Characteristics

• ROE indicates how much return you have generated using the equity capital invested by shareholders in your company

• Evidence exists that, on average, long run ROE is between 11-13% (for large Australian firms)

– That is, firms with larger or smaller ROE will overtime tend to revert to the range of 11-13%

• “Mean-reverting”

• What would be the forecast of ROE for the next 5 years of a company that experienced 5 years (historical data) of high (say, 30%) ROE?

– Theoretically, ROE must revert to the mean within the forecast period

Page 16: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

16

ROE-Mean Reversion

Page 17: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

17

ROE-Mean Reversion

Page 18: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

ASX Code Company Name Industry

EBIT Margin

EBITDA Margin ROE ROA

NOPLAT Margin

Financial Leverage

Price/Book Value

ANZAustralia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd Bank -- -- 14.74% 0.95% -- -- 1.78

CBACommonwealth Bank of Australia Bank -- -- 16.91% 0.92% -- -- 2.14

NAB National Australia Bank Limited Bank -- -- 11.76% 0.67% -- -- 1.39

WBC Westpac Banking Corporation Bank -- -- 15.42% 0.95% -- -- 1.82

BHP BHP Billiton Limited Iron ore/coal mining 37.44% 46.43% 25.70% 14.70% 24.84% 180.12% 3.64

FMG Fortescue Metals Group Ltd Iron ore mining 34.67% 39.35% 51.57% 19.56% 33.51% 359.16% 7.39

MCC Macarthur Coal Limited Coal Mining 25.98% 26.02% 11.29% 8.68% 18.79% 138.85% 2.73

RIO Rio Tinto Limited Iron ore/coal mining 37.00% 37.52% 24.04% 13.81% 27.75% 172.20% 2.61

CGJ Coles Group Limited Grocery retail 3.25% 4.81% 19.53% 8.83% 2.51% 248.83% 4.45

MTS Metcash Limited Grocery wholesale 3.54% 3.94% 18.58% 8.24% 2.66% 264.16% 2.26

TRS The Reject Shop Limited Discount warehouse 6.95% 8.81% 45.30% 18.14% 5.15% 259.83% 7.91WOW Woolworths Limited Grocery/household retail 5.96% 7.50% 26.69% 11.99% 4.44% 236.48% 4.26

ROE-Comparisons of large Australian Firms

Page 19: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

19Presentation title

ROE-BP

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders

3,780  23,451  11,582  25,700  (3,719)

Total BP shareholders' equity

111,441  129,302  118,414  111,465  94,987 

Ratio

ROE1 3.39% 18.14% 9.78% 23.06% -3.92%

Benchmarks

ROE, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 12.41% 14.37% 19.18% 22.16% 18.10%

ConocoPhillips 13.23% 17.58% 17.56% 19.07% 16.57%

Exxon Mobil Corp. 18.65% 18.72% 27.06% 26.59% 20.74%

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

8.65% 9.09% 14.11% 18.24% 13.60%

ROE, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas 11.63% 15.04% 17.90% 22.03% 13.71%

ROE, Industry

Oil & Gas 10.17% 14.33% 16.39% 20.05% 12.76%

Page 20: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Decomposing Profitability: Traditional Approach

ROE = ROA x Financial leverage

= Net Income – Preference Divs * Ave. Assets

Ave. Assets Ave. Common shareholders’ Equity

ROA = Profit Margin x Asset Turnover

= Net Income – Preference Divs * Sales

Sales Ave. Assets

ROE= Profit Margin x Asset Turnover x Financial leverage

Page 21: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

21Presentation title

Decomposing Profitability: DuPont Approach

Profitability Ratio ROE

Profitability Ratio ROA

Debt and Safety Ratio: Financial

LeverageAsset Management Ratio: Asset Turnover

Other Debt and Safety Ratios

Dividend Payout Ratio

Other Asset Management Ratios

Profitability Ratio: Profit Margin

Other Margins

Page 22: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

22Presentation title

Trade-off between Profit Margin and Asset Turnover

• There is always a trade-off between profit margin and asset turnover.

Page 23: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

23Presentation title

More Leverage?

ROE= Profit Margin x Asset Turnover x Financial leverage

More Leverage?

Page 24: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Decomposing Profitability: Advanced DuPont Approach

An alternative approach focuses on the effects of leverage

– A. Financial Leverage– B. Operating Liability Leverage

Page 25: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Decomposing Profitability: Advanced DuPont Approach

Page 26: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Decomposing Profitability: Advanced DuPont Approach

ROE is ultimately being equal to:

– RNOA (Return on Net Operating Assets) = Operating Income (After tax) / Net Operating Assets

– FLEV (Financial Leverage) = Net Financial Obligation (Liability) / Equity – NBC(Net Borrowing Cost) = Net Interest Expenses (after tax) / Net Financial Obligation– SPREAD (Financial Spread)= RNOA – NBC– ROOA = (Operating Income +Implicit Interest (after tax))/Operating Assets – OLLEV (Operating liability leverage)=Operating Liabilities/Operating Assets – OLSPREAD (Operating liability spread)=ROOA-Short-term Borrowing Rate (after tax)

]NBC -RNOA x [FLEVRNOA ROE

Spread

RNOA = ROOA + (OLLEV x OLSPREAD)

Page 27: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

When the effective interest rate after tax is larger than operating

ROA, Spread will be negative as will Spread*Net Financial

Leverage

– Results in a reduction in ROE

Spread is the incremental economic effect of introducing debt

into the capital structure

– Spread will be positive provided the effective interest rate

after tax is less than operating ROA

Decomposing Profitability: Advanced DuPont Approach

Page 28: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Benchmark for profitability analysis -ROE and Cost of Equity Capital

• To interpret ROE, comparison with firms’ cost of equity capital is most

appropriate

– ROE is the return to equity holders (shareholders) and thus it is best

to be compared against the cost of equity capital

• The advantage is that this measure is determined by the market and can

not be influenced by management

• Calculation of cost of equity capital considered in week 10

28th February 2011

Presentation title 28

Page 29: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Benchmark for profitability analysis - ROA and WACC

• ROA is the return on assets which have been financed by both the equity capital and debt holders

– ROA is best to be compared against the weighted average cost of debt and equity (WACC, weighted average cost of capital)

• Calculation of WACC considered in week 10

Page 30: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

30Presentation title

ROE vs. ROA

Theoretically, ROE will be higher than ROA

– The benchmark for ROA in Australia is in the range of 8-10%

Recall, ROE tends to revert to a mean in the range of 11-13%:

– As such, firms’ cost of equity capital should be higher than their WACC

Page 31: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

31Presentation title

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders

3,780  23,451  11,582  25,700  (3,719)

Total assets 284,305  305,690  300,193  293,068  272,262 

Ratio

ROA1 1.33% 7.67% 3.86% 8.77% -1.37%

Benchmarks

ROA, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 7.23% 8.44% 11.24% 12.84% 10.30%

ConocoPhillips 5.89% 7.76% 7.19% 8.12% 7.27%

Exxon Mobil Corp. 9.30% 9.39% 13.45% 12.40% 10.07%

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

4.21% 4.58% 7.38% 8.96% 6.24%

ROA, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas 5.64% 7.45% 8.75% 10.29% 6.24%

ROA, Industry

Oil & Gas 4.93% 7.02% 7.97% 9.53% 5.98%

ROA-BP

Page 32: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

32Presentation title

Assessing Operating Management:Income Statement Ratios

• Common-sized income statements facilitate comparisons of key line items across time and different firms

• Additionally, the following ratios are also helpful:– Gross profit margin– EBIT margin– EBITDA margin (EBIT also before depreciation &

amortisation)

Page 33: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

33Presentation title

Gross Profit Margin

• Measures the profitability of sales, less direct costs of sales:Gross profit margin = Sales – Cost of sales Sales

The gross profit margin is an indicator of:– The price premium that a firm’s product commands in the

market– The efficiency of a firm’s procurement and/or production

process

Page 34: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

34Presentation title

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Gross profit 44,286  53,258  48,427  65,754  16,281 

Sales and other operating revenues

353,568  379,136  375,580  375,517  297,107 

Ratio

Gross profit margin1 12.53% 14.05% 12.89% 17.51% 5.48%

Benchmarks

Gross Profit Margin, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 23.62% 23.77% 25.69% 26.48% 27.22%

ConocoPhillips 40.96% 45.08% 44.75% 13.98% 15.50%

Exxon Mobil Corp. 24.85% 25.08% 25.83% 27.13% 29.13%

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

15.15% 15.44% 15.23% 15.67% 16.42%

Gross Profit Margin-BP

Page 35: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

35Presentation title

EBIT and EBITDA Margins

• The EBIT margin provides a comprehensive measure of operations:

EBIT margin = EBIT Sales

• The EBITDA margin eliminates the significant non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization along with interest and taxes:

EBITDA =Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization Sales

Page 36: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

36Presentation title

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders

3,780  23,451  11,582  25,700  (3,719)

Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

223  307  234  397  395 

Add: Income tax expense

947  6,463  6,993  12,737  (1,501)

Earnings before tax (EBT)

4,950  30,221  18,809  38,834  (4,825)

Add: Finance costs 1,148  1,068  1,125  1,246  1,170 

Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT)

6,098  31,289  19,934  40,080  (3,655)

Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortization

15,163  13,510  12,481  11,135  11,164 

Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)

21,261  44,799  32,415  51,215  7,509

EBIT and EBITDA-BP

Page 37: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Oil and Gas Industry: EBITDA margin comparison

Page 38: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Asset management ratios

Asset management is a key indicator of how effective a firm’s management is.

Asset turnover may be broken into two primary components:

1. Working capital management2. Long-term asset management

Page 39: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Working Capital Management

• Working capital is the difference between current assets and current liabilities.

• Operating working capital is defined as (Current assets - cash) - (current liabilities - short term debt).

• Key ratios useful for analyzing the management of working capital include:• Working capital turnover = Operating revenue / operating working capital.• Working capital to revenue = Operating working capital / operating revenue. • Inventory turnover = Operating revenue / current inventory.• Day’s payable = (Creditors / operating revenue) * # days in financial year.• Day’s receivables = (Debtors / operating revenue) * # days in financial year• Day’s inventory = (Current inventory / operating revenue) * # days in financial

year

Page 40: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Inventory Turnover-BP

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Cost of operating revenues 309,282  325,878  327,153  309,763  280,826 

Inventories 18,373  29,231  27,867  25,661  26,218 

Ratio

Inventory turnover1 16.83 11.15 11.74 12.07 10.71

Benchmarks

Inventory Turnover, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 22.28 24.97 26.58 30.95 24.70

ConocoPhillips 23.30 25.03 33.19 42.46 28.17

Exxon Mobil Corp. 16.00 17.64 20.88 20.42 18.01

Royal Dutch Shell PLC 18.14 12.72 12.87 13.68 10.48

Inventory Turnover, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas 17.73 14.24 15.22 17.30 13.94

Inventory Turnover, Industry

Oil & Gas 16.41 13.95 14.60 16.87 13.67

Page 41: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

41Presentation title

Receivable Turnover-BP

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Sales and other operating revenues

353,568  379,136  375,580  375,517  297,107 

Trade receivables 19,671  28,868  25,977  27,929  24,255 

Ratio

Receivables turnover1

17.97 13.13 14.46 13.45 12.25

Benchmarks

Receivables Turnover, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 11.98 10.18 10.98 11.21 9.55

ConocoPhillips 7.87 6.58 6.49 16.71 13.74

Exxon Mobil Corp. 21.26 16.19 15.97 15.54 14.55

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

14.83 11.54 11.62 9.73 9.83

Receivables Turnover, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas

15.79 12.32 12.73 12.63 11.69

Receivables Turnover, Industry

Oil & Gas 13.59 11.20 11.56 11.87 10.86

Page 42: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Long-term Assets Management

Invested capital turnover = Operating revenue / operating invested capital before goodwill.

Long term asset turnover = Operating revenue / non current assets

PPE turnover = Operating revenue / (property, plant & equipment - accumulated depreciation).

Page 43: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

43Presentation title

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Sales and other operating revenues

353,568  379,136  375,580  375,517  297,107 

Property, plant and equipment

130,692  133,690  120,448  119,214  110,163 

Ratio

Net fixed asset turnover1

2.71 2.84 3.12 3.15 2.70

Benchmarks

Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 1.09 1.34 1.63 1.99 1.90

ConocoPhillips 0.70 0.75 0.86 2.91 2.29

Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.56 1.73 2.00 2.18 1.85

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

2.19 2.35 2.71 3.09 2.58

Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas 1.70 1.89 2.18 2.60 2.23

Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Industry

Oil & Gas 1.64 1.77 1.99 2.39 2.04

Fixed Asset Turnover-BP

Page 44: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

44Presentation title

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Sales and other operating revenues

353,568  379,136  375,580  375,517  297,107 

Total BP shareholders' equity

111,441  129,302  118,414  111,465  94,987 

Ratio

Equity turnover1 3.17 2.93 3.17 3.37 3.13

Benchmarks

Equity Turnover, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 1.29 1.48 1.69 2.01 1.89

ConocoPhillips 1.01 1.04 1.21 3.75 2.76

Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.26 2.42 2.73 3.02 2.52

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

2.45 2.51 2.48 2.77 2.49

Equity Turnover, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas

2.14 2.23 2.41 2.90 2.53

Equity Turnover, Industry

Oil & Gas 1.98 2.07 2.22 2.66 2.28

Equity Turnover-BP

Page 45: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Debt and safety ratios (financial leverage analysis)

• Borrowing allows a firm to access to capital, but increases the risk of ownership for equity holders

• Analysis of leverage can be performed on both short- and long-term debts:

– Liquidity analysis relates to evaluating current liabilities– Solvency analysis relates to longer term liabilities

Page 46: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Liquidity analysis

• There are several ratios useful to evaluate a firm’s liquidity, including:

– Current ratio– Quick ratio– Cash ratio– Operating cash flow ratio

• Each of these ratios attempts to measure the ability of a firm to pay its current obligations

Page 47: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Liquidity analysis

Knowing how the liquidity ratios are calculated allows the user to understand how to interpret them:

Current ratio = Current assets Current liabilities

Quick ratio = Cash + Short-term investments + Accts. receivable Current liabilities

Cash ratio = Cash + Marketable securities Current liabilities

Operating cash flow ratio = Cash flows from operations Current liabilities

Page 48: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

48Presentation title

Current Ratio-BP

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Current assets 87,262  96,840  110,981  97,584  96,853 

Current liabilities 63,615  72,812  77,586  84,318  83,879 

Ratio

Current ratio1 1.37 1.33 1.43 1.16 1.15

Benchmarks

Current Ratio, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 1.32 1.52 1.63 1.58 1.68

ConocoPhillips 1.31 1.26 1.38 1.08 1.26

Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.82 0.83 1.01 0.94 0.94

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

1.16 1.11 1.18 1.17 1.12

Current Ratio, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas 1.15 1.15 1.27 1.15 1.16

Current Ratio, Industry

Oil & Gas 1.25 1.24 1.34 1.20 1.22

Page 49: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

49Presentation title

Quick Ratio-BP

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Loans 333  216  247  244  247 Trade receivables 19,671  28,868  25,977  27,929  24,255 Other receivables 11,367  10,963  11,687  15,597  12,294 Other investments 329  467  319  288  1,532 Cash and cash equivalents

29,763  22,520  19,548  14,067  18,556 

Total quick assets 61,463  63,034  57,778  58,125  56,884 

Current liabilities 63,615  72,812  77,586  84,318  83,879 

Ratio

Quick ratio1 0.97 0.87 0.74 0.69 0.68

Benchmarks

Quick Ratio, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 0.94 1.16 1.25 1.25 1.30ConocoPhillips 1.03 0.99 0.78 0.82 1.00Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.51 0.53 0.70 0.67 0.65

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

0.72 0.64 0.74 0.69 0.60

Quick Ratio, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas 0.77 0.75 0.79 0.75 0.73

Quick Ratio, Industry

Oil & Gas 0.85 0.83 0.85 0.80 0.78

Page 50: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

50Presentation title

Cash Ratio-BP

Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010

Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions)

Other investments 329  467  319  288  1,532 Cash and cash equivalents

29,763  22,520  19,548  14,067  18,556 

Total cash assets 30,092  22,987  19,867  14,355  20,088 

Current liabilities 63,615  72,812  77,586  84,318  83,879 

Ratio

Cash ratio1 0.47 0.32 0.26 0.17 0.24

Benchmarks

Cash Ratio, Competitors

Chevron Corp. 0.41 0.50 0.64 0.60 0.59ConocoPhillips 0.44 0.43 0.25 0.23 0.42Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.17 0.13

Royal Dutch Shell PLC

0.25 0.10 0.19 0.11 0.13

Cash Ratio, Sector

Integrated Oil & Gas

0.29 0.21 0.26 0.20 0.23

Cash Ratio, Industry

Oil & Gas 0.34 0.26 0.27 0.22 0.25

Page 51: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Debt and Safety Ratios

• Beyond short-term survival, solvency measures the ability of a firm to meet long-term obligations

• Several useful ratios are used to analyse solvency. Three using only shareholders’ equity as a denominator are:

• Financial leverage = Total assets / shareholders equity

• Gross gearing = (Short term debt + long term debt) / shareholders equity

• Net gearing = (Short term debt + long term debt - cash) / shareholders equity

Page 52: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Sustainable Growth Ratio

• A comprehensive measure of a firm’s ratios is the sustainable growth rate, which uses ROE:

ROE * (1 - Dividend payout ratio)

Where:Dividend payout ratio = Cash dividends paid

Net income

• Sustainable growth rate measures the ability of a firm to maintain its profitability and financial policies

Page 53: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Sustainable Growth Ratio

Page 54: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Cash Flow Analysis

• Cash flow analysis can provide further insights into operating, investing and financing activities

• The analysis focuses on the financial ability of a company to pay the outgoings according to a priority list

• 1. Interest payments• 2. Repayment of loans• 3. Capital expenditures• 4. Dividend payments

Page 55: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Cash Flow Analysis

– Note that interest expense and dividends paid are related to financing activities.

– Interest income and dividends received are related to investing activities.

– That is, for our purposes, these items should not be included in the operating activities of a company.

Page 56: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Cash Flow Analysis

– So, the first task in cash flow analysis is to rearrange the classifications in the cash flow statement , if required.

– That is, operating cash flow section should include only operating activities.

– Add back interest and dividends paid, to the operating cash flow.

– Deduct interest and dividend received, from operating cash flows.

– Cash flow analysis starts by looking at cash flow from operations and comparing it with NPAT

Page 57: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Cash Flow Analysis

Is there sufficient operating cash flows to meet interest payments?

• If yes, how many times?• If no, the company is in trouble!

Is there sufficient operating cash flows after interest payments to pay cash dividends?

• If yes, how many times?• If no, how does this affect share prices?

• Should the company borrow to pay dividends?

Is there sufficient cash flows to repay loan principal?• Is it feasible to borrow to do so?

• What is the interest rate on the new borrowings?

Is there sufficient cash flows to expand?• Is it a good idea to use our own funds to expand?

Page 58: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Financial Statement Analysis and Public Debt

Debt ratings provide important information to investors (Moody’s

and S&P)

The meaning of debt ratings:

• Standard & Poor’s has a rating system from D to AAA that

grades the relative riskiness of debt

• Debt ratings influence the yield that debt instruments must pay

for investors to buy them.

Page 59: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Table 10.2: Debt Ratings - Example

Page 60: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Table 10.3: Median Financial Ratios by Debt Ratings Category

Page 61: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Financial Analysis and Public Debt

Factors that drive debt ratings:

• Performance measures are used to gauge the expected future health of

the firm and the ability to repay debt.

• Credit analysis (debt and safety ratio)

Page 62: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Factors Used in Quantitative Models of Debt Ratings

Page 63: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Prediction of Distress and Turnaround

Models for distress prediction• Debt of distressed companies present investment opportunities because they trade at steep

discounts. (e.g. Australian Vintage, Photon Group)

• Financials can be analyzed to predict distress (e.g. Allied Brands)

• Several models to predict distress have been developed over the years. One of the more popular and robust models is the Altman’s Z-score model:

Page 64: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Altman z-score

The Altman z-score is a measure of a company financial strength that uses a weighted sum of several factors.

Distress zone will differ across industries and types of companies

Zones of Discrimination:

Z > 2.99 -“Safe” Zones

1.81 < Z < 2.99 -“Grey” Zones

Z < 1.81 -“Distress” Zones

Page 65: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Your Project

Section

F

Financial

Analysis

  5 500

  Profitability

analysis

Many of the ratios are available in Osiris. Identify the more important ones.

Merely stating the ratios will not fetch marks. A brief discussion on key ratios is

required. Comparison against peer and industry is important (both time series

and cross sectional).

1 100

  Asset

management

analysis

Many of the ratios are available in Osiris. Identify the more important ones.

Merely stating the ratios will not fetch marks. A brief discussion on key ratios is

required. Comparison against peer and industry is important (both time series

and cross sectional).

1 100

  Debt and safety

analysis

Many of the ratios are available in Osiris. Identify the more important ones.

Merely stating the ratios will not fetch marks. A brief discussion on key ratios is

required. Comparison against peer and industry is important (both time series

and cross sectional).

1 100

  Cash Flow

Analysis

 

Many of the cash flow ratios are available in database. Identify the more

important ones. A brief discussion on the company’s cash flow position is

required. Comparison against peer and industry is important (both time series

and cross sectional).

1 100

  Credit analysis Include credit ratings for your company from credit rating agencies (if any).

Conduct the distress analysis and measure Altman’s Z score across two recent

years.

1 100

65

Page 66: Week 8-Financial Analysis-S2 2015

Next week

Forecasting