Upload
emerald-sherman
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Wedge-shaped and sloping aquifers
Adam ForsbergJanuary 28, 2013
Until Now
• Thickness constant• Water table horizontal
3 Cases:
1. Wedge shaped confined aquifers at unsteady-state2. Sloping unconfined aquifers at steady-state3. Sloping unconfined aquifers at unsteady-state
Wedge-shaped confined at unsteady-state flow
• Assumptions– Thickness of aquifer
varies exponentially in direction of flow (x-direction)• Constant in y-direction
– Homogeneous, isotropic– Rate of change in aquifer
thickness < 0.20 in direction of flow
Hantush’s inflection point method
Sloping, unconfined aquifers steady-state
• Culmination-point method– Slope of the water table = slope of impermeable
basement• Assumptions– Unconfined Aquifer with constant saturated
thickness– Slopes uniformly in the direction of flow
Sloping, unconfined aquifers steady-state
• Flow per unit width– F = width where water is drawn– α= slope of the impermeable
base
• At some distance from the well, the combined slopes for α and dh/dx will equal zero – Inflection or culmination point
Sloping, unconfined aquifers unsteady-state
• Assumptions– Unconfined– Seemingly infinite areal
extent– Isotropic, homogeneous,
and uniform thickness– Prior to pumping, the
water table slopes in direction of flow with gradient < 0.2
– Unsteady-state
Sloping, unconfined aquifers unsteady-state
• Hantush’s method
• i < 0.2