Upload
phungkhuong
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
Using Computers to Increase Assessment Scores
Description of the Capstone Experience and Results
Matthew Bryson
Spring 2016
Kennesaw State University
Instructional Technology
Dr. Dias
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
Setting
Gladden Middle School is a Title 1 school located in Chatsworth, GA and is a part of the
Murray County School System. There are approximately 550 students in the school which is
made up of 7th and 8th grade. The school is a predominantly Caucasian school with 88%
Caucasian, 10% Hispanic and 2% other. The school also has 95% of its students that qualify for
free or reduced lunch. Gladden Middle School recently received the Striving Reader Grant
which gives the school approximately $60,000 dollars a year over 5 years. The goal of this grant
is to not only ensure that students are literate, but are using 21st century skills as well. Gladden
Middle School purchased access to Learning.com in its first year to help our students with 21st
century skills.
Problem and Rationale
Gladden Middle School has technology throughout the building. Each classroom has a
projector, Smart Board, surround sound speakers, computer, internet access, and a CPS clicker
system. The school also has several computer labs and project rooms. A survey completed last
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
year by teachers expressed that less than twenty percent of teachers engaged students in
technology on a weekly routine. A new state test, Georgia Milestones, is arriving in April and
thirty percent of the school is supposed to be tested online. This will require those students to be
familiar with using the computer and typing their answers. Students will need extra time on the
computer to become familiar with using the computer in a setting where they will be required to
write in an extended response format. A 30-minute time period each week dedicated for these
students who will take the test online will help equip them with the familiarization needed to be
successful on the end of grade test.
Objectives/Deliverables:
The students will need a routine to be familiar with using the word processor that will be used on
the end of grade assessment.
• Identify a group of students who will take the end of grade test online.
• Identify a group of teachers who will be required to assess these students on the
computer.
• Establish best practices for students using a word processor.
• Set a schedule for students to practice using the word processor on a weekly basis.
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
PSC Standards
1. Visionary Leadership
Candidates demonstrate the knowledge, skills and dispositions to inspire and lead the
development and implementation of a shared vision for the effective use of technology to
promote excellence and support transformational change throughout the organization.
1.1 Shared Vision
Candidates facilitate the development and implementation of a shared vision for the use of
technology in teaching, learning, and leadership.
1.2 Strategic Planning
Candidates facilitate the design, development, implementation, communication, and evaluation
of technology-infused strategic plans.
2. Teaching, Learning & Assessment
Candidates demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to effectively integrate
technology into their own teaching practice and to collaboratively plan with and assist other
educators in utilizing technology to improve teaching, learning, and assessment.
2.1 Content Standards & Student Technology Standards
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
Candidates model and facilitate the design and implementation of technology-enhanced learning
experiences aligned with student content standards and student technology standards.
2.5 Differentiation
Candidates model and facilitate the design and implementation of technology-enhanced learning
experiences making appropriate use of differentiation, including adjusting content, process
product, and learning environment based upon an analysis of learner characteristics, including
readiness levels, interests, and personal goals.
2.6 Instructional Design
Candidates model and facilitate the effective use of research-based best practices in instructional
design when designing and developing digital tools, resources, and technology-enhanced
learning experiences.
2.7 Assessment
Candidates model and facilitate the effective use of diagnostic, formative and summative
assessments to measure student learning and technology literacy, including the use of digital
tools and resources.
2.8 Data Analysis
Candidates model and facilitate the effective use of digital tools and resources to systematically
collect and analyze student achievement data, interpret results, communicate findings, and
implement appropriate interventions to improve instructional practice and maximize student
learning.
3. Digital Learning Environments
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
Candidates demonstrate the knowledge, skills and dispositions to create, support, and manage
effective digital learning environments.
3.2 Managing Digital Tools and Resources
Candidates effectively manage digital tools and resources within the context of student learning
experiences.
3.5 Basic Troubleshooting
Candidates troubleshoot basic software and hardware problems common in digital learning
environments.
3.6 Selecting and Evaluating Digital Tools & Resources
Candidates collaborate with teachers and administrators to select and evaluate digital tools and
resources for accuracy, suitability, and compatibility with the school technology infrastructure.
3.7 Communication & Collaboration
Candidates utilize digital communication and collaboration tools to communicate locally and
globally with students, parents, peers, and the larger community.
4. Digital Citizenship & Responsibility
Candidates demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to model and promote digital
citizenship and responsibility.
4.2 Safe, Healthy, Legal & Ethical Use
Candidates model and facilitate the safe, healthy, legal, and ethical uses of digital information
and technologies.
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
4.3 Diversity, Cultural Understanding & Global Awareness
Candidates model and facilitate the use of digital tools and resources to support diverse student
needs, enhance cultural understanding, and increase global awareness.
5. Professional Learning & Program Evaluation
Candidates demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to conduct needs assessments,
develop technology-based professional learning programs, and design and implement regular and
rigorous program evaluations to assess effectiveness and impact on student learning.
5.2 Professional Learning
Candidates develop and implement technology-based professional learning that aligns to state
and national professional learning standards, integrates technology to support face-to-face and
online components, models principles of adult learning, and promotes best practices in teaching,
learning and assessment.
5.3 Program Evaluation
Candidates design and implement program evaluations to determine the overall effectiveness of
professional learning on deepening teacher content knowledge, improving teacher pedagogical
skills and/or increasing student learning.
6. Candidate Professional Growth & Development
Candidates demonstrate the knowledge, skills and dispositions to engage in continuous learning,
reflect on professional practice, and engage in appropriate field experiences.
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
6.1 Continuous Learning
Candidates demonstrate continual growth in knowledge and skills of current and emerging
technologies and apply them to improve personal productivity and professional practice.
6.2 Reflection
Candidates regularly evaluate and reflect on their professional practice and dispositions to
improve and strengthen their ability to effectively model and facilitate technology-enhanced
learning experiences.
6.3 Field Experiences
Candidates engage in appropriate field experiences to synthesize and apply the content and
professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions identified in these standards.
ISTE- Nets for teachers
1. Facilitate and inspire student learning and creativity
Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to
facilitate experiences that advance student learning, creativity, and innovation in both face-to-
face and virtual environments.
1. Promote, support, and model creative and innovative thinking and inventiveness
2. Engage students in exploring real-world issues and solving authentic problems using
digital tools and resources
3. Promote student reflection using collaborative tools to reveal and clarify students’
conceptual understanding and thinking, planning, and creative processes
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
4. Model collaborative knowledge construction by engaging in learning with students,
colleagues, and others in face-to-face and virtual environments
2. Design and develop digital age learning experiences and assessments
Teachers design, develop, and evaluate authentic learning experiences and assessments
incorporating contemporary tools and resources to maximize content learning in context and
to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes identified in the Standards.
5. Engage in Professional Growth and Leadership
Teachers continuously improve their professional practice, model lifelong learning, and exhibit
leadership in their school and professional community by promoting and demonstrating the
effective use of digital tools and resources.
a. Participate in local and global learning communities to explore creative applications of
technology to improve student learning
b. Exhibit leadership by demonstrating a vision of technology infusion, participating in shared
decision making and community building, and developing the leadership and technology skills of
others
c. Evaluate and reflect on current research and professional practice on a regular basis to make
effective use of existing and emerging digital tools and resources in support of student learning
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
d. Contribute to the effectiveness, vitality, and self-renewal of the teaching profession and of
their school and community
Project Description
Gladden Middle School is looking to meet the state goal on the end of grade assessment. Thirty
percent of the school’s population is required to take the assessment online using a word
processor. The study will determine if the routine of using the word processor on a weekly basis
will make the students feel more prepared for taking the end of grade assessment.
Thirty percent of the school that take the end of grade assessment will be required to meet
weekly and practice writing on a word processor. The students will be monitored and assessed
before the assessment to see the readiness of each person. After the assessment a survey will be
conducted to see if the routine set for the students gave them the confidence needed to succeed.
Timeline
Component Objective/Deliverable Estimated Dates
Capstone Proposal Final Proposal completed January 2015
Introductory Meetings*Inform teachers of the students that will take the assessment online.
*Research proper techniques for using a word processor with middle school students.
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
*Design a team to monitor and implement a plan for thirty percent of the students to use on a
weekly basis. February 2015
Word Processing Implementation Selected students will use a word processor on a weekly
basis. February 2015-April 2015
Monthly Meeting with Team that Monitors Word Processor Use *Teachers meet to discuss
word processor use and strategies that need adjusting.
February 2015-April 2015
Evaluation *Ongoing evaluations conducted teachers who monitor word processor use.
*Survey conducted with students and teachers associated with word processor use.
February 2015-May 2015
Resources
• Selected teachers
• Thirty percent of the student population
• Student survey assessing use of project
• Teacher survey on effectiveness of project
• Learning.com to access 21st century skills test
• Meeting room for selected teachers
• Computers and internet access
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
Evaluation
An evaluation will be conducted every month leading up to the end of grade assessment.
Teachers that are selected to monitor the use of a word processor will meet to discuss progress
and to discuss what adjustments need to be made. The information collected will be shared
through email with the faculty of the school to gather feedback from teachers who are not
selected to monitor the focus group. The students will take the end of grade assessment and
complete a survey to see how the routine of using a word processor affected their testing ability
on the end of grade assessment that required them to use a word processor. When the scores from
the end of grade assessment become available they will be compared to previous scores. The
goal of this project is to equip thirty percent of the student population with the required skills
need to be familiar with using a word processor on the end of grade assessment. Students will
use a word processor on a weekly basis to prepare them and give them the experience needed to
perform and meet state expectations on the end of the grade assessment.
Appendix A
Sample Survey for teachers using technology
1. How many times a week is technology used in your classroom?
2. How many times a week is technology primarily used by students in your classroom?
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
3. How many times a week does lecture occur in your classroom?
4. How many times a week does student engagement occur in your classroom?
5. What specific strategies do you use weekly in your classroom?
6. How experienced with technology are you?
7. Are you willing to learn about new ways to use technology in your classroom?
8. How experienced do you think your students are with technology?
9. What skills must your students possess to be successful in a 21st century world?
Appendix B
Sample Survey for students using and accessing technology
1. How many times a week in your classes do you use technology?
2. How many times a week in your classes does the teacher use technology?
3. Do you have access to the Internet at home or at a relatives or neighbors?
4. How many hours a week do you spend outside of class using technology?
5. How experienced are you with technology?
6. What skills do you think you will need to be successful in the world today?
7. How often do you complete your Homework assignments?
Capstone Part B
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
The results of the capstone project showed that students did benefit from time each week
on the computer to prepare for the end-of-grade assessment. Students were not prepared to take
an assessment on the computer via the web. They need time to become acquainted with using the
keyboard, mouse, and software since they would be evaluated using a computer to complete the
assessment. The proposal was for students with disabilities to become more successful at taking
assessments using computers.
The time students were provided to work on the computer was mainly used as
intervention time to remediate the skills they needed to master grade-level standards. This
process gave students an opportunity to fill gaps in their learning while preparing them to take
the end-of-grade assessment. The students used various programs to improve their experience
with using the computer during assessments. Students used iXL.com, studyisland.com,
iReady.com, and Microsoft Word to answer constructive response questions. Students were
provided 30 minutes to one hour each week for time to work specifically on improving
assessment strategies on the computer.
A major barrier that came about was the bandwidth needed to equip 100+ students on the
web at one time. The first trial run with students on the same program via the web did not go
well. Later, a second trial run was given and was successful. The second largest barrier was the
testing schedule. The school was equipped with four computer labs with a maximum of 30
computers. The computers did not all work at the same time. Students had to be assigned to
different rooms which required more adult supervision. Students need to be exposed to the exact
procedures of the assessment to lessen any anxiety that comes with the testing atmosphere.
The evaluations completed via teachers and students showed that while teachers did not
enjoy another assessment for students and time away from instructions, teachers and students felt
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
better equipped to engage in a new assessment because of exposure to an intentional computer
assessment each week. Specific examples of teacher feedback included, “students should not
have to be worried about another assessment, they should be worried about learning.” Specific
examples of student feedback included, “I hate test, I love school but the test make everything
hard.”
A concept that was learned was that the technology facilitation needs a collaborative
effort. One teacher or administrator cannot be responsible for administering an assessment to all
students. A training can be held, but in order for a successful process to be carried out, buy-in is
required. Students can pick up on how teachers feel toward a given issue and will not put the
effort forth to progress if they do not notice teacher buy-in.
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
Discussion and Reflection
The results of the capstone project showed that students did benefit from time each week
on the computer to prepare for the end-of-grade assessment. Students were not prepared to take
an assessment on the computer via the web. They need time to become acquainted with using the
keyboard, mouse, and software for which they would be evaluated on. Seeing an idea in your
head and having it implemented in a middle school can leave many teachers thinking “What
went wrong?” After a few sessions of trying to implement a plan to better equip students with the
skills to be assessed on a computer, I was left thinking many things. Students had to be able to
access the computer in order to complete the end of grade assessment. They also had to know the
academic content in order to move on to the next grade level.
Consistency in implementation was a key to developing a high level of
integration. Each student had to be familiar with the processes of logging on to the programs to
having a user interface to operate. Obstacles arose with bandwidth and teacher preparation of
equipping the students with required items during the practice sessions. This was the most
important aspect of the proposal. It became evident that I needed to believe in the process and
have faith in my students that they would learn while becoming familiar with “clicking, typing,
and scrolling.”
A big, lonely feeling came over me when I saw something was not working and it needed
to be adjusted. I realized that this is what leadership is about. A technology leader not only can
make the tough decisions on the fly but also see how to integrate technological processes while
impacting student progress.
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
PSC Standard 3.1 Digital Learning Environments outlines the perceived outcomes
of the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to create, support, and manage effective digital
learning environments. In order to have full competency of a technology facilitator, one must
see that effective “digital” learning is taking place. Technology must not be presented for the
sack of technology but for the major purpose of increase student motivation, learning, and
academic achievement. Technology is the gateway to student learning. Students have a different
outlook towards lessons when a technological component is present.
I learned how to think and interact amongst myself and teacher leaders, but also
learned how to spike the students interest and motivation. The capstone project pushed me
outside of my comfort zone and forced me to grow and become aware of how to overcome
obstacles, not just identify them. I also learned the technology facilitation needs a collaborative
effort. One teacher or administrator cannot be responsible for administering an assessment to all
students. A training can be held but in order for a successful process to be carried out, buy-in is
required. Students can pick up on how teachers feel toward a given issue and will not put the
effort forth to progress if they do not notice teacher buy-in.
Discussion
The literature examined looked at alternative ways to increase achievement with
students with disabilities and students who are learning English as a second language. This was
my purpose from the perspective of assistive technology. I wanted students to be familiar with
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
the computer and gather skills that would lead them to show the knowledge gained throughout
the school year.
The outcomes tied closely with the literature that was reviewed. Many practices
and results were predicted but several were not. The outcomes lead me to make adjustments and
change my thinking during the project. Success will not happen if the same habits that fail keep
occurring.
My advice would be to gather the advice of others and make a thorough plan for a
project. Consider what could go wrong as what will go wrong. Always have a backup plan to
keep students engaged and on task. Make every moment productive. Students will try to get
away with behaviors that are not corrected immediately, but once norms are set they will try to
follow those if monitoring is occurring. Do not be afraid to admit your own idea needs adjusting
or dumping. Always evaluate your actions and the outcomes, but at the same time give your plan
time to work. A good rule is after 3-4 full opportunities a difference should be evident.
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES
References
Johnson, Doug (2012). The Classroom Teacher’s Technology Survival Guide. Jossey-
Bass Teacher.
Pitle, Howard. (2012). Using Technology with Classroom Instruction That Works, 2nd
Edition. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development 2nd Edition.
Alnahdi, G. (2014). Assistive technology in special education and the universal design
for learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 18-22.
Balmeo, M. (2014). Integrating technology in teaching students with special learning
needs in the SPED schools in Baguio City. The IAFOR Journal of Education, 2(2), 149-178.
Running Head: USING COMPUTERS TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT SCORES