Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BJ Sutcliffe
Lance Sacknoff
ENGL 250 Section HB
7 October 2013
It's not DiGiorno, it's delivery!
What makes a good persuasive argument? Facts? Stories? Maybe, but how
about the proper use of argumentative tricks? Many methods have been created
over the years to persuade such as having a credible source or arguing in a way that
makes people emotionally attached. A vast majority of what makes a good argument
is it’s rhetorical situation. Such as organization, context, substance, style and
delivery. The use of such methods can be used in both visuals and writing. Michael
Kimmel and Steve Kelley are two persuaders that properly use methods such as
engagement and accessibility in their own style to help their particular pieces.
"Bros Before Hoes": The Guy Code is Michael Kimmel’s explanation as to why
guys act the way they do. This essay can be found in his book "The Perilous World
Where Boys Become Men" written in 2008. His intended audience is young males,
but he writes so it can appeal to anyone. The essay is about how guys around age
twenty fit into a social group. This group follows a set of rules taught to them as a
child known as The Guy Code. The Guy Code governs a majority of their actions. It is
also the rules that turn boys into men. The rules seem to have originated from the
elder men in the boys’ lives and they make a man appear cooler to other men. Guys
are taught to be daring, emotionless, independent, to brush off pain, and to think of
items and wealth as the ultimate success. In an attempt to stay manly, boys must
Sutcliffe 1
alter everything they do to avoid being called feminizing names. Anything that
appears to be feminine or gay must be avoided such as dressing nice and showing
emotions. Homophobia is one of the biggest driving forces that make men feel the
need to appear manly. Men would resort to using drugs and some say they would go
as far as killing themselves if they didn’t fit in with other men. Kimmel then gives
example about how this way of thinking starts at a young age of three and a half
years old. He then explains how the rules cause issues socially and psychologically.
The men were taught to never express weak emotions and that the use of anger and
violence is how they should act.
Right away the title to the essay is an early attention grabber to get
Kimmel’s specific audience engaged. I happen to fit right into his audience, so
for me, when I read the words “bros before hos” I was already curious to read
more about it. Shortly after the intro is a list of phrases or rules most guys
have heard of and some would even agree upon. This is merely a page into the
essay and he already has his readers interested in the material to come.
Kimmel also includes a quote from a well-known rapper, Eminem, giving his
description of the word “faggot.” This is a good use of an Ethos appeal.
Throughout the essay he gives multiple quotes of stories from multiple
situations relating to masculinity. These stories range from parenting a young
boy, to guys talking about various ways they were picked on for showing
unmanly attributes. These are all various attempts at getting a reader more
connected to get them more intrigued with the essay.
Sutcliffe 2
The idea Kimmel is trying to say in this essay is fairly hard to detect. It does
not explicitly say the topic in the introduction or throughout the rest of the essay.
But does this mean the audience cannot understand the message? The point of the
essay is almost subliminal, it’s not very easy to notice, but yet it’s understood
nonetheless. After reading the end of the essay and questioning myself as to why
guys would act in a way would cause them so much mental harm, the answer had
something to do with the boys being taught that way. After more thought I realized
that is the topic question and the answer to it. Kimmel asked multiple guys where
they learned to be tough or manly. The guys answer with: their father, teachers, PE
teachers, brothers, coaches, and grandfathers, mainly any male elder in their life.
The idea of the code of masculinity was then reinforced by the boys peers by way of
name-calling. Words such as: wuss, nerd, queer, pussy, gay, or faggot. This is just a
way that guys keep other guys in line. Kimmel is trying to say that this guy code way
of thinking is taught to them rather than being a man’s instinct. By making his topic
a little unclear, it almost makes the piece irrefutable. The way he writes makes it
easy to accept the message. The message he’s stating is that of a sociology trait
rather than psychological one. So overall the topic question does not have to be
explicitly known in order to absorb the message and that is the beauty of how
Kimmel writes this piece.
Steve Kelley, on the other hand, prefers a different approach to persuasion.
Kelley uses visuals for his methodology. The visual is an editorial cartoon about the
legalization of same sex marriage. It depicts a man and women lying in bed,
presumably after intercourse. The man is then reading a paper discussing a court
Sutcliffe 3
ruling in favor of same sex marriage. He says, “It will make an absolute mockery of
traditional marriage!” The woman responds with, “That’s just what my husband
says.” In the corner of the picture are the words “The Times Picayune, 2003, S.
Kelley.”
Within the cartoon are a few examples of proper argumentation. These techniques
are used to give the argument strength. Due to these practices, this cartoon is very
effective to people who relate to the characters, the adulterers. Anyone else who can
understand its message will also appreciate its humor.
To engage the audience, Kelley uses irony within a controversial subject. The
irony creates a sense of humor to keep the image and it’s message within the
reader’s head. This helps the overall purpose of the piece by letting the reader think
more about what they’ve seen. People tend to be fond of controversial matters; this
may also play a small role in his engagement. The sole fact that it is a visual is very
Sutcliffe 4
attractive to some people. Having something to look at rather than read appeals to
people because pictures are usually short and sweet.
The message within the picture is very easy to understand. In the picture it
has the topic clearly written. The picture includes someone saying gay marriage is
wrong. Then it shows that he is doing an equally wrong if nor more wrong of an act
than what he is against. Therefore it is clear that Kelley is poking fun at these people
that are against gay marriage by saying that some of the things they partake in are
sometimes worse than what they are against. Kelley uses a clear topic, and a clear
message to make his point.
Both Kimmel and Kelley use engagement and accessibility to their advantage.
Kimmel uses multiple quotes and common phrases to attract his readers while
Kelley uses visual appeal. Kelley simplicity of a visual may be quick and easy, but if
given the time to read through Kimmel’s work, readers would feel a more powerful
argument because he offers so much more to keep his readers attracted. Even
though Kimmel’s topic may be a little harder to understand at first while Kelley’s is
pretty strait forward, Kimmel still has much more power behind his accessibility.
They both have a message that can be understood, but Kimmel writes his in a way
that makes it practically irrefutable. Overall they both use the techniques as a good
demonstration for others to use within their own pieces of work.
Sutcliffe 5
Works Cited
Kelley, Steve. Cartoon. Rereading America. Ed. Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and
Bonnie Lisle. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s. 2013. 73. Print.
Michael Kimmel. “’Bros Before Hos’: The Guy Code” Rereading America. Ed. Gary
Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
2013. 461-470. Print.
Sutcliffe 6