Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2012 年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题National Entrance Test of English for MA/MS
Candidates (NETEM)
Section Use of EnglishⅠ
Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank
and mark [A], [B], [C] or [D]on ANSWER SHEET 1. ( 10 points)
The ethical judgments of the Supreme Court justices became an important issue
recently. The court cannot_____ its legitimacy as guardian of the rule of law______
justices behave like politicians. Yet, in several instances, justices acted in ways
that_____ the court’s reputation for being independent and impartial。 Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito Jr., for example, appeared at political
events. That kind of activity makes it less likely that the court’s decisions will be____
as impartial judgments. Part of the problem is that the justices are not _____ by an
ethics code. At the very least, the court should make itself_______ to the code of
conduct that ______to the rest of the federal judiciary。 This and other cases ______the question of whether there is still a _____
between the court and politics。 The framers of the Constitution envisioned law____ having authority apart from
politics. They gave justices permanent positions ____ they would be free to ____those
in power and have no need to_____ political support. Our legal system was designed
to set law apart from politics precisely because they are so closely _____。 Constitutional law is political because it results from choices rooted in
fundamental social ______like liberty and property. When the court deals with social
policy decisions, the law it _____is inescapably political — which is why decisions
split along ideological lines are so easily _____ as unjust。 The justices must _____doubts about the court’s legitimacy by making
themselves _____to the code of conduct. That would make their rulings more likely to
be seen as separate from politics and, _____, convincing as law。1 A emphasize B maintain C modify D recognize
2 A when B best C before D unless
3 A rendered B weakened C established D eliminated
4 A challenged B compromised C suspected D accepted
5. A advanced B caught C bound D founded
6. A resistant B subject C immune D prone
7. A resorts B sticks C leads D applies
8. A evade B raise C deny D settle
9. A line B barrier C similarity D conflict
10. A by B as C through D towards
11. A so B since C provided D though
12. A serve B satisfy C upset D replace
13. A confirm B express C cultivate D offer
14 A guarded B followed C studied D tied
15. A concepts B theories C divisions D convenience
16. A excludes B questions C shapes D controls
17. A dismissed B released C ranked D distorted
18. A suppress B exploit C address D ignore
19. A accessible B. amiable C agreeable D accountable
20. A by all means B at all costs C in a word D as a result
Section Reading ComprehensionⅡ
Part A
Directions: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by
choosing [A], [B], [C] or [D]. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET1. (40 points)
Text 2
Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour,
yet it is pervasive in our young girls’ lives. It is not that pink intrinsically bad, but it is
a tiny slice of the rainbow and, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also
repeatedly and firmly fused girls’ identity to appearance. Then it presents that
connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls as not only innocent but as
evidence of innocence. Looking around, despaired at the singular lack of imagination
about girls’ lives and interests。 Girls' attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA,
but according to Jo Paoletti, an associate professor of American Studies, it's not.
Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century: in the era before
domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matter, since the only
way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What's more, both boys and girls wore
what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were
introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version
of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimations of the Virgin
Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolised femininity. It was not until the mid-
1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children's
marketing strategy, that pink fully came into its own, when it began to seem innately
attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical
years。 I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of
what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological
development. Take the toddler. I assumed that phase was something experts developed
after years of research into children's behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to
Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing
gimmick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s。 Trade publications counselled department stores that, in order to increase sales,
they should create a "third stepping stone" between infant wear and older kids'
clothes. It was only after "toddler" became common shoppers' term that it evolved
into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier
categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to
segment a market is to magnify gender differences – or invent them where they did
not previously exist。26 By saying "it is ... The rainbow"(line 3, Para 1) , the author means pink
_______。 A should not be the sole representation of girlhood
B should not be associated with girls' innocence
C cannot explain girls' lack of imagination
D cannot influence girls' lives and interests
27 According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true of colours?
A Colors are encoded in girls' DNA
B Blue used to be regarded as the color for girls
C Pink used to be a neutral color in symbolizing genders
D White is preferred by babies
28 The author suggests that our perception of children's psychological devotement
was much influenced by ________。 [A] the marketing of products for children
[B] the observation of children's nature
[C] researches into children's behavior
[D] studies of childhood consumption
29. We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised ________。 A focuses on infant wear and older kids' clothes
B attach equal importance to different genders
C classify consumers into smaller groups
D create some common shoppers' terms
30. it can be concluded that girl's attraction to pink seems to be _____。 A clearly explained by their inborn tendency
B fully understood by clothing manufacturers
C mainly imposed by profit-driven businessmen
D well interpreted by psychological experts
Part B
Directions: For questions 41-45, choose the most suitable paragraphs from the list A-
G and fill them into the numbered boxes to form a coherent text. Paragraph E has
been correctly placed. There is one paragraph which does not fit in with the text. Mark
your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. ( 10 points)
Part C
Directions: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined
segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER
SHEET 2. ( 10 points)
Since at least the days of Aristotle, a search for universal principles has characterized
the scientific enterprise. In some ways, this quest for commonalities defines science:
without it, there is no underlying order and pattern, merely as many explanations as
there are things in the world. Newton's laws of motion, the oxygen theory of
combustion and Darwinian evolution each bind a host of different phenomena into a
single explicatory framework.
In physics, one approach takes this impulse for unification to its extreme, and seeks a
theory of everything — a single generative equation for all we see. It is becoming less
clear, however, that such a theory would be a simplification, given the proliferation of
dimensions and universes that it might entail. Nonetheless, unification of sorts
remains a major goal.
This tendency in the natural sciences has long been evident in the social sciences too.
Here, Darwinism seems to offer justification, for if all humans share common origins,
it seems reasonable to suppose that cultural diversity could also be traced to more
constrained beginnings. Just as the bewildering variety of human courtship rituals
might all be considered to be forms of sexual selection, perhaps the world's languages,
music, social and religious customs and even history are governed by universal
features. To filter out what is contingent and unique from what is shared might enable
us to understand how complex cultural behaviour arose and what guides it in
evolutionary or cognitive terms. That, at least, is the hope. But a comparative study of
linguistic traits published online today (M.Dunn et al.Nature
doi:10.1038/nature09923; 2011) supplies a reality check. Russell Gray at the
University of Auckland, New Zealand, and his colleagues consider the evolution of
grammars in the light of two previous attempts to find universality in language. The
most famous of these efforts was initiated by Noam Chomsky, who postulated that
humans are born with an innate
language-acquisition capacity — a brain module or modules specialized for language
— that dictates a universal grammar. A few generative rules are then sufficient to
unfold the entire fundamental structure of a language, which is why children can learn
it so quickly. Languages would diversify through changes to the 'parameter settings' of
the generative rules.
The second, by Joshua Greenberg, takes a more empirical approach to universality,
identifying traits (particularly in word order) shared by many languages, which are
considered to represent biases that result from cognitive constraints. Chomsky's and
Greenberg's are not the only theories on the table for how languages evolve, but they
make the strongest predictions about universals. Gray and his colleagues have put
them to the test using phylogenetic methods to examine four family trees that between
them represent more than 2,000 languages. A generative grammar should show
patterns of language change that are independent of the family tree or the pathway
tracked through it, whereas Greenbergian universality predicts strong co-dependencies
between particular types of word-order relations (and not others). Neither of these
patterns is borne out by the analysis, suggesting that the structures of the languages
are lineage-specific and not governed by universals.
This does not mean that cognitive constraints are irrelevant, or that there are no other
universals dictated by communication efficiency. It is surely inevitable that cognition
sets limits on, say, word length. But such 'universals' seem likely to be relatively
trivial features of languages, just as may be the case for putative universals in music
and other aspects of culture.
The conclusion? We should perhaps learn the lesson of Darwinism: a 'universal'
mechanism of adaptation says little in itself about how a particular feature got to be
the way it is, or about how it works. This truth has dawned on physicists too:
universal equations are all very well, but the world actually consists of particular
solutions, and these are generally the result of contingent history. One size does not
always fit all.
Section WritingⅢ
Part A
51. Directions:
You should write about 100 words on ANSWER SHEET 2.
Do not sign your own name at the end of the notice. Use "Postgraduates' Association"
instead. ( 10 points)
Part B
52. Directions: Write an essay of 160-200 words based on the following drawing. In
your essay, you should
1)describe the picture briefly,
2)explain its intended meaning, and
3)give your comments。You should write neatly on answer sheet 2.