Upload
solomon-beebee
View
224
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Weather derivative hedging& Swap illiquidity
Dr. Michael Moreno
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 2
Call/Put Hedging
• Diversification or Static hedging (portfolio oriented)– PCA– Markowitz– SD
• Dynamic hedging (Index hedging)
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 3
Dynamic Hedging
1. Temperature Simulation process used
2. Swap hedging and cap effects
3. Greeks neutral hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 4
1. Temperature Simulation process used
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 5
Temperature simulation
• GARCH
• ARFIMA
• FBM
• ARFIMA-FIGARCH
• Bootstrapp
Long MemoryHomoskedasticity
Short MemoryHeteroskedasticity
Heteroskedasticity& Long Memory
Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 6
ARFIMA-FIGARCH model
iiiii ymST
Seasonality Trend ARFIMA-FIGARCH
Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used
Seasonal volatility
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 7
ARFIMA-FIGARCH definition
ttd LyLL 01
Where, as in the ARMA model, is the unconditional mean
of yt while the autoregressive operator
and the moving average operator
are polynomials of order a and m, respectively, in the lag
operator L, and the innovationst are white noises with the
variance σ2.
a
j
jj LL
1
1
We consider first the ARFIMA process:
m
j
jj LL
1
1
Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 8
FIGARCH noise
1 ttt Varh
Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used
Given the conditional variance
We suppose that
22 1]1[1 td
tt LLLhL
Cf Baillie, Bollerslev and Mikkelsen 96 or Chung 03 for full specification
Long term memory
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 9
Distributions of London winter HDDHistoSim
Densities
2,4002,2002,0001,8001,6001,4001,2001,000
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0
Histo Sim
Average 1700.79 1704.54
St Dev 128.52 119.26
Skewness 0.42 -0.01
Kurtosis 3.63 3.13
Minimum 1474.39 1375.13
Maximum 2118.64 2118.92
With similar detrending methods
The slight differences come mainlyfrom the year 1963
Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 10
2. Swap hedging and cap effects
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 11
Swap Hedging
Long HDD Call and optcall HDD Swap
Long HDD Put and optput HDD Swap
Dynamic values
Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 12
Deltas of a capped call
Delta of Capped Calls
cap 200gfedcb cap 400gfedcb cap 800gfedcb
M ean2 100
2 0001 900
1 8001 7001 600
1 5001 4001 300
Delta
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
Vol
140
130
120
110
100
90
Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 13
Deltas of capped swaps
Delta of Capped Swaps
Delta Sw ap cap 200gfedcb Delta of Sw ap cap 400gfedcbDelta of Sw ap cap 800gfedcb
Strike 2 0001 9001 8001 7001 6001 5001 4001 300
Delta
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Vol
140
130
120
110
100
90
Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 14
Call optimal delta hedgeoptcall= call/ swap
Delta of Capped Call & Swap
call cap 200gfedcb sw ap cap 200gfedcb
Mean2 1002 0001 9001 8001 7001 6001 5001 4001 300
Delta
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
NOT = 1
Prices of Capped Call & Swap
sw ap cap 200gfedcb call cap 200gfedcb
Mean2 1002 0001 9001 8001 7001 6001 5001 4001 300
Fai
r V
alue
s
150
100
50
0
-50
-100
-150
Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 15
Put optimal delta hedge
optput= put/ swap NOT = 1
Delta of Capped Put & Swap
sw ap cap 200gfedcb put cap 200gfedcb
Mean2 1002 0001 9001 8001 7001 6001 5001 4001 300
Delta
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
Prices of Capped Put & Swap
sw ap cap 200gfedcb put cap 200gfedcb
Mean2 1002 0001 9001 8001 7001 6001 5001 4001 300
Fai
r V
alue
s
150
100
50
0
-50
-100
-150
Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 16
3. Greeks neutral hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 17
Traded swap levels
• THE DATA USED IS MOST CERTAINLY INCOMPLETE
• We would like to thank Spectron Group plc for providing the weather market swap data
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 18
Historical swap levels LONDON HDD December
London HDD December
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
05-Nov-02 10-Nov-02 15-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 25-Nov-02 30-Nov-02 05-Dec-02 10-Dec-02 15-Dec-02
Date
HD
D
MeanMaxMinCurrent Index
Weather Index Cone - LONDON HDD December 2002
28/12/200221/12/200214/12/200207/12/2002
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
280
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
Forward 380Before the period started: swap level belowThen swap level above like the partial index
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 19
Historical swap levels LONDON HDD January
London HDD January
250
300
350
400
450
500
30-Dec-02 04-Jan-03 09-Jan-03 14-Jan-03 19-Jan-03 24-Jan-03
Date
HD
D
MeanMaxMinCurrent Index
Weather Index Cone - LONDON HDD January 2003
31292725232119171513110907050301
580560540
520500480460
440420400380
360340320300
280260240220
200180160
14012010080
604020
Forward 400Before the period started: swap level belowThen swap level has 2 peaks and does not followthe partial index evolution which is well above the mean
Part 3 Delta Vega Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 20
Historical swap levels LONDON HDD February
MeanMaxMinCurrent Index
Weather Index Cone - LONDON HDD February 2003
2826242220181614121008060402
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
280
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
London HDD February
250
270
290
310
330
350
370
390
04-Jan-03
09-Jan-03
14-Jan-03
19-Jan-03
24-Jan-03
29-Jan-03
03-Feb-03
08-Feb-03
13-Feb-03
18-Feb-03
23-Feb-03
Date
HD
D
Forward 350Before the start of the period, the swap level is well below the forwardThen swap level converges toward with forward
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 21
Historical swap levels LONDON HDD March
MeanMaxMinCurrent Index
Weather Index Cone - LONDON HDD March 2003
302826242220181614121008060402
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
280
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
London HDD March
282
284
286
288
290
292
294
296
298
300
302
30-Dec-02
09-Jan-03
19-Jan-03
29-Jan-03
08-Feb-03
18-Feb-03
28-Feb-03
10-Mar-03
20-Mar-03
30-Mar-03
Date
HD
D
Forward 340Before the period started: swap level below the forwardThen swap level converges toward final swap level
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 22
Swap level Behaviour
• OF COURSE IT DEPENDS ON THE MODEL USED TO ESTIMATE THE FORWARD REFERENCE
• The swap seems to start to trade below its forward before the start of the period and remains quite constant prior the start of the period (or 10 days before)
• The swap level converges quickly to its final value (10 days in advance)
• There can be very erratic levels
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 23
Consequences on Option Hedging
• Before the start of the period when the swap level is below the forward (if it really is!) then the swap has a strong theta, a non zero gamma (if capped) and a delta away from 1 (if capped)
• The delta of the traded swap convergences towards 1 slowly
• 10 days before the end of the period, the delta is close to 1, the theta is close to zero, the gamma is close to zero
• The vega of the option will be close to zero 10 days before the end of the period
• Erratic swap levels must not be taken into account
• Before the start of the period, assuming the swap level is quite constant, it is easier to sell the option volatility than during the period
• During the period, the theta of the option will not offset the theta of the swap, nor will the gamma of the option offset the gamma of the swap
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 24
No neutral hedging
• Due to the cap on the swap and swap illiquidity the resulting position is likely to be non Delta neutral, non Gamma neutral, non Theta neutral and non Vega neutral
• If the swaps are kept (impossible to roll the swaps), the Gamma and Theta issues are likely to grow
• Solutions:
– Minimise function of Greeks
– Minimise function of payoffs (e.g. SD)
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 25
Market Assumptions
• Bid/Ask spread of Swap is 1% of standard deviation
(London Nov-Mar Stdev 100 => spread = 1 HDD).
• No market bias: (Bid + Ask) / 2 = Model Forward
• Option Bid/Ask spread is 20 % of StDev.
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 26
Trajectory exampleForward trajectory - London HDD December 02
330
340
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
25/1
1/20
02
30/1
1/20
02
05/1
2/20
02
10/1
2/20
02
15/1
2/20
02
20/1
2/20
02
25/1
2/20
02
30/1
2/20
02
04/0
1/20
03
date
HD
D
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
StD
ev
1 2 3 4
1: decrease in vol (15%) implies a higher gamma and theta => rehedge
2: increase in vol => less sensitive to gamma and theta but forward down by 25% of vol => rehedge
3: forward down, vol still high and will go down quickly (near the end of the period) => rehedge
4: sharp decrease in vol and forward => rehedge
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 27
Simulation results summary
• The smaller the caps on the swap the higher the frequency of adjustment must be and the higher is the hedging cost (transaction/market/back office cost). Alternately we can keep the swap to hedge extreme unidirectional events.
• For out of the money options, if the caps of the option are identical to the caps of the swap, then the hedging adjustment frequency is reduced (delta, gamma are close).
• The combination of swap illiquidity with caps creates a substantial bias in Greeks Hedging. The higher the caps the more efficient is the hedge.
• Optimising a portfolio using SD, Markowitz or PCA criterias is still a favoured solution for hedging but is inappropriate for option volatility traders.
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 28
Conclusion
With the success of CME contracts, other exchanges and new players may enter into the weather market.
This may increase liquidity which will make dynamic hedging of portfolios more practical.
New speculators such as volatility traders may be attracted. This may give the opportunity to offer more complex hedging tools that the primary market needs with lower risk premia.
www.weatherderivs.com Dr. Michael Moreno 29
References• J.C. Augros, M. Moreno, Book “Les dérivés financiers et d’assurance”, Ed
Economica, 2002.
• R. Baillie, T. Bollerslev, H.O. Mikkelsen, “Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive condition heteroskedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 1996, vol 74, pp 3-30.
• F.J. Breidt, N. Crato, P. de Lima, “The detection and estimation of long memory in stochastic volatility”, Journal of econometrics, 1998, vol 83, pp325-348
• D.C. Brody, J. Syroka, M. Zervos, “Dynamical pricing of weather derivatives”, Quantitative Finance volume 2 (2002) pp 189-198, Institute of physics publishing
• R. Caballero, “Stochastic modelling of daily temperature time series for use in weather derivative pricing”, Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 2003.
• Ching-Fan Chung, “Estimating the FIGARCH Model”, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, 2003.
• M. Moreno, "Riding the Temp", published in FOW - special supplement for Weather Derivatives
• M. Moreno, O. Roustant, “Temperature simulation process”, Book “La Réassurance”, Ed Economica, Marsh 2003.
• Spectron Ltd for swap levels