Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
sensors
Article
Performance Optimization Design for a High-SpeedWeak FBG Interrogation System Based on DFB Laser
Yiqiang Yao 1, Zhengying Li 1,2,*, Yiming Wang 2, Siqi Liu 2, Yutang Dai 1, Jianmin Gong 3
and Lixin Wang 1
1 National Engineering Laboratory for Fiber Optic Sensing Technology, Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430070, China; [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (Y.D.);[email protected] (L.W.)
2 Key Laboratory of Fiber Optic Sensing Technology and Information Processing, Ministry of Education,Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China; [email protected] (Y.W.);[email protected] (S.L.)
3 Department of Optical Access Network, Huawei Technologies USA, Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA;[email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-158-071-50968
Academic Editors: George Rodriguez, Joseba Zubia and Paulo S. AndréReceived: 25 April 2017; Accepted: 19 June 2017; Published: 22 June 2017
Abstract: A performance optimization design for a high-speed fiber Bragg grating (FBG)interrogation system based on a high-speed distributed feedback (DFB) swept laser is proposed.A time-division-multiplexing sensor network with identical weak FBGs is constituted to realizehigh-capacity sensing. In order to further improve the multiplexing capacity, a waveform repairingalgorithm is designed to extend the dynamic demodulation range of FBG sensors. It is based onthe fact that the spectrum of an FBG keeps stable over a long period of time. Compared with thepre-collected spectra, the distorted spectra waveform are identified and repaired. Experimentalresults show that all the identical weak FBGs are distinguished and demodulated at the speed of100 kHz with a linearity of above 0.99, and the range of dynamic demodulation is extended by 40%.
Keywords: optical fiber sensing; weak fiber Bragg grating; high speed; distributed feedback laser
1. Introduction
With the practical advantages of small size, light weight, multiplexing capability, and resistance toelectromagnetic interference (EMI) [1], fiber Bragg grating (FBG) has received considerable interest inthe application of mechanical monitoring [2–4]. However, high-frequency vibration, a key parameterof mechanical monitoring, can hardly be measured with FBG, as the FBG demodulation speed which iscommonly below a few kHz in conventional demodulation technologies such as grating matching [5,6],charge-coupled device (CCD) array [7], and tunable Fabry-Pérot (F-P) filter [8].
Focused on dynamic detection requirements for high frequency signal, some new demodulationmethods have been proposed; a fast FBG sensor system using the Fourier domain mode-locked(FDML) swept laser [9,10] was developed to realize a 60 kHz demodulation speed. However, FDMLswept laser is complex, expensive, and instable, which limits its adoption for practical applications.Our research team proposed a 100 kHz differential demodulation method based on dispersioncompensation fiber and single mode fiber [11]. However, in order to achieve this performance,an ultra-high-speed oscillator with 80 GHz sampling rate is needed, whose cost exceeds the budget ofmost sensing applications.
In previous work, we demonstrated a high-speed FBG integrated demodulation system based ona distributed feedback (DFB) laser [12]. With a high speed current-modulated DFB laser and a Field
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472; doi:10.3390/s17071472 www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 2 of 9
Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) real-time data processing circuit, a demodulation speed of 100 kHzwas achieved. It is considered as a promising demodulation method in engineering applications for itssimple structure, low cost, high reliability, and real-time response. However, the spectral scanningrange of the current modulation is only 1 nm, which seriously restricts its capacity and dynamicdemodulation range.
In this paper, we combined the high-speed sensing system with identical weak FBG array,whose wavelength change is typically less than 1 nm. We also designed a waveform repair algorithmto estimate the Bragg wavelength of an FBG whose reflection spectrum is only partially detected,and hence broadens the dynamic demodulation range of the FBG sensors. The experimental setupsucceeded in demodulating multiple weak FBG sensors at 100 kHz.
2. Experimental Setup and Principle
The schematic diagram of the interrogation system is shown in Figure 1. The DFB laser witha 20 mA threshold is driven by a 100 kHz 20–150 mA sawtooth wave current. The current tuningcoefficient of the DFB laser is about 8 pm/mA, then the wavelength scanning range is over 1 nm.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 2 of 9
100 kHz was achieved. It is considered as a promising demodulation method in engineering applications for its simple structure, low cost, high reliability, and real-time response. However, the spectral scanning range of the current modulation is only 1 nm, which seriously restricts its capacity and dynamic demodulation range.
In this paper, we combined the high-speed sensing system with identical weak FBG array, whose wavelength change is typically less than 1 nm. We also designed a waveform repair algorithm to estimate the Bragg wavelength of an FBG whose reflection spectrum is only partially detected, and hence broadens the dynamic demodulation range of the FBG sensors. The experimental setup succeeded in demodulating multiple weak FBG sensors at 100 kHz.
2. Experimental Setup and Principle
The schematic diagram of the interrogation system is shown in Figure 1. The DFB laser with a 20 mA threshold is driven by a 100 kHz 20–150 mA sawtooth wave current. The current tuning coefficient of the DFB laser is about 8 pm/mA, then the wavelength scanning range is over 1 nm.
Figure 1. Schematic of a high-speed weak fiber Bragg grating (FBG) interrogation system based on a distributed feedback (DFB) laser.
After being amplified by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), the swept laser pulses illuminate the identical weak FBG array through an optical circulator. Each grating reflects part of the light (i.e., red region in Figure 2c), and all the reflected light passes the same circulator and is received by a photodetector (PD). Signals from different gratings are separated in the time domain on account of the high scanning speed of the laser and the transmission delay among the gratings, as sketched in Figure 2d. Pre-amplifier, analog-to-digital converter (ADC), and FPGA are used to amplify, sample, and process the serial data from the PD, respectively. A typical spectrum of the weak FBG is shown as Figure 3. The peak reflected intensity from the weak FBG is about −54.2 dBm under −34 dBm incident light. Therefore, the reflectivity of the weak FBG is only 1%, and the reflection spectra of all FBGs have similar 3-dB bandwidths of about 200 pm. Meanwhile, the wavelength difference in the weak FBG array has been controlled within 50 pm in the practical system. Therefore, it will avoid the disunity of the demodulation on the sensing array because when the spectra of identical FBGs move to the margin of the demodulation range, some FBGs with excessive wavelength difference might have already moved out, causing the disunity of the demodulation on the sensing array.
The distance between two neighboring gratings, namely FBGi (i = 1, 2,…, n) and FBGi+1, is fixed as the spatial resolution L. As shown in Figure 2a, the time delay Δtdelay between ti and ti+1 can be calculated as:
1
2 effdelay i i
L nt t t
c
(1)
Where c represents the light speed in the vacuum, and neff is the effective refractive index of the single mode optical fiber. Meanwhile, the wavelength-to-time mapping is realized in the optical domain by using a DFB laser that has a fast wavelength scanning speed. Therefore, the reflected spectrum of every FBG is transferred to a temporal waveform and separated with an interval of Δtdelay
Figure 1. Schematic of a high-speed weak fiber Bragg grating (FBG) interrogation system based on adistributed feedback (DFB) laser.
After being amplified by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), the swept laser pulsesilluminate the identical weak FBG array through an optical circulator. Each grating reflects partof the light (i.e., red region in Figure 2c), and all the reflected light passes the same circulator and isreceived by a photodetector (PD). Signals from different gratings are separated in the time domainon account of the high scanning speed of the laser and the transmission delay among the gratings,as sketched in Figure 2d. Pre-amplifier, analog-to-digital converter (ADC), and FPGA are used toamplify, sample, and process the serial data from the PD, respectively. A typical spectrum of the weakFBG is shown as Figure 3. The peak reflected intensity from the weak FBG is about −54.2 dBm under−34 dBm incident light. Therefore, the reflectivity of the weak FBG is only 1%, and the reflection spectraof all FBGs have similar 3-dB bandwidths of about 200 pm. Meanwhile, the wavelength differencein the weak FBG array has been controlled within 50 pm in the practical system. Therefore, it willavoid the disunity of the demodulation on the sensing array because when the spectra of identicalFBGs move to the margin of the demodulation range, some FBGs with excessive wavelength differencemight have already moved out, causing the disunity of the demodulation on the sensing array.
The distance between two neighboring gratings, namely FBGi (i = 1, 2, . . . , n) and FBGi+1, is fixedas the spatial resolution L. As shown in Figure 2a, the time delay ∆tdelay between ti and ti+1 can becalculated as:
∆tdelay = ti+1 − ti =2L× ne f f
c(1)
where c represents the light speed in the vacuum, and neff is the effective refractive index of the singlemode optical fiber. Meanwhile, the wavelength-to-time mapping is realized in the optical domain byusing a DFB laser that has a fast wavelength scanning speed. Therefore, the reflected spectrum of everyFBG is transferred to a temporal waveform and separated with an interval of ∆tdelay in the time domain.The center wavelength of the FBG reflected spectrum can be calculated by the following equation:
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 3 of 9
λFBGi = Vs ×[ti − (i− 1)∆tdelay
]+ λ0 (2)
where Vs (nm/s) is the wavelength scanning speed of DFB, and λ0 is the initial wavelength at thebeginning of the scanning. Nevertheless, the non-linear problem of the DFB wavelength-swept laserwould change the Vs which will influence the accuracy of the wavelength results. Therefore, we havecalibrated and calculated the wavelength-swept speed in a segmented manner to reduce the negativeinfluence from the sweep nonlinearity [12].
Besides, in order to fully distinguish all FBGs’ spectra in the time domain, and to avoid thewaveform overlap of the respective 200-pm, 3-dB bandwidths, a spatial interval L of 100 m is set in thecurrent system to ensure the sufficient ∆tdelay. Since the wavelength inconsistency from FBGs will alsoaffect the spatial interval, it might require a larger space interval to avoid the waveforms overlap forthe FBG fabrication uncertainty. Thus, the wavelength differences of FBGs are controlled within 50 pmin the current system.
Therefore, in this distributed identical weak FBG sensing system, the wavelength information ofall the FBGs can be distinguished and acquired at a high repetition rate.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 3 of 9
in the time domain. The center wavelength of the FBG reflected spectrum can be calculated by the following equation:
01FBGi s i delayV t i t (2)
where Vs (nm/s) is the wavelength scanning speed of DFB, and λ0 is the initial wavelength at the beginning of the scanning. Nevertheless, the non-linear problem of the DFB wavelength-swept laser would change the Vs which will influence the accuracy of the wavelength results. Therefore, we have calibrated and calculated the wavelength-swept speed in a segmented manner to reduce the negative influence from the sweep nonlinearity [12].
Besides, in order to fully distinguish all FBGs’ spectra in the time domain, and to avoid the waveform overlap of the respective 200-pm, 3-dB bandwidths, a spatial interval L of 100 m is set in the current system to ensure the sufficient Δtdelay. Since the wavelength inconsistency from FBGs will also affect the spatial interval, it might require a larger space interval to avoid the waveforms overlap for the FBG fabrication uncertainty. Thus, the wavelength differences of FBGs are controlled within 50 pm in the current system.
Therefore, in this distributed identical weak FBG sensing system, the wavelength information of all the FBGs can be distinguished and acquired at a high repetition rate.
Figure 2. Principle of FBG distinction and demodulation. (a) The arrangement of FBGs and the received times of each reflection peaks; (b) Driving signal of the DFB laser; (c) The output of the DFB laser; (d) The reflected waveform of FBGs received by the photodetector (PD).
Figure 3. The spectrum of the weak FBG.
Figure 2. Principle of FBG distinction and demodulation. (a) The arrangement of FBGs and the receivedtimes of each reflection peaks; (b) Driving signal of the DFB laser; (c) The output of the DFB laser;(d) The reflected waveform of FBGs received by the photodetector (PD).
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 3 of 9
in the time domain. The center wavelength of the FBG reflected spectrum can be calculated by the following equation:
01FBGi s i delayV t i t (2)
where Vs (nm/s) is the wavelength scanning speed of DFB, and λ0 is the initial wavelength at the beginning of the scanning. Nevertheless, the non-linear problem of the DFB wavelength-swept laser would change the Vs which will influence the accuracy of the wavelength results. Therefore, we have calibrated and calculated the wavelength-swept speed in a segmented manner to reduce the negative influence from the sweep nonlinearity [12].
Besides, in order to fully distinguish all FBGs’ spectra in the time domain, and to avoid the waveform overlap of the respective 200-pm, 3-dB bandwidths, a spatial interval L of 100 m is set in the current system to ensure the sufficient Δtdelay. Since the wavelength inconsistency from FBGs will also affect the spatial interval, it might require a larger space interval to avoid the waveforms overlap for the FBG fabrication uncertainty. Thus, the wavelength differences of FBGs are controlled within 50 pm in the current system.
Therefore, in this distributed identical weak FBG sensing system, the wavelength information of all the FBGs can be distinguished and acquired at a high repetition rate.
Figure 2. Principle of FBG distinction and demodulation. (a) The arrangement of FBGs and the received times of each reflection peaks; (b) Driving signal of the DFB laser; (c) The output of the DFB laser; (d) The reflected waveform of FBGs received by the photodetector (PD).
Figure 3. The spectrum of the weak FBG. Figure 3. The spectrum of the weak FBG.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 4 of 9
3. Incomplete Waveform Repair Algorithm
As shown in Figure 4a, the swept DFB laser has a limited scanning range of 1 nm. In practice,three types of reflected waveforms of FBGs would be obtained: complete waveform, incompletewaveform type I, and incomplete waveform type II, as sketched in Figure 4b–d. In incompletewaveform type I, a small portion of the reflection spectrum of the FBG is out of the laser's scanningrange, while the reflection peak remains in the range. In incomplete waveform type II, a large portionof the reflection spectrum including the reflection peak is out of the scanning range. The reflectedwavelength of these incomplete waveforms cannot be demodulated by an ordinary Gaussiancurve-fitting algorithm [13]. Therefore, in our original demodulation system, considering thatthe adopted FBG has 200-pm, 3-dB bandwidths and that the incomplete waveform will appearsymmetrically in the scanning range of 1 nm, the incomplete waveform type II occupied nearly a200-pm wavelength range, leaving only an 800-pm dynamic demodulation range left. An efficientincomplete waveform repairing algorithm is proposed in this section.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 4 of 9
3. Incomplete Waveform Repair Algorithm
As shown in Figure 4a, the swept DFB laser has a limited scanning range of 1 nm. In practice, three types of reflected waveforms of FBGs would be obtained: complete waveform, incomplete waveform type I, and incomplete waveform type II, as sketched in Figures 4b–d. In incomplete waveform type I, a small portion of the reflection spectrum of the FBG is out of the laser's scanning range, while the reflection peak remains in the range. In incomplete waveform type II, a large portion of the reflection spectrum including the reflection peak is out of the scanning range. The reflected wavelength of these incomplete waveforms cannot be demodulated by an ordinary Gaussian curve-fitting algorithm [13]. Therefore, in our original demodulation system, considering that the adopted FBG has 200-pm, 3-dB bandwidths and that the incomplete waveform will appear symmetrically in the scanning range of 1 nm, the incomplete waveform type II occupied nearly a 200-pm wavelength range, leaving only an 800-pm dynamic demodulation range left. An efficient incomplete waveform repairing algorithm is proposed in this section.
Figure 4. Three types of reflected waveforms of FBG: (a) Scanning spectrum of the DFB laser; (b) Complete waveform; (c) Incomplete waveform type I; (d) Incomplete waveform type II.
The incomplete waveform repairing algorithm is based on FBG waveform characteristics, such that its spectral shape U(n) acquired by the system does not change, but the amplitude of the received waveform will be a little bit different, which is caused by the non-flat-intensity of the wavelength-swept light source and the transmission loss disturbance in the FBG sensor network. As shown in Figure 5, the system has acquired the waveforms of one FBG with wavelength shift, and their peak count is found as a, b, c. It can be seen that their waveforms Ua(n), Ub(n), Uc(n) have different amplitudes.
0 200 400 600 800 10000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Volta
ge(V
)
Sampling Point
Ua(n) Ub(n) Uc(n) rUb(n) rUc(n)
Figure 5. Normalization process of one FBG at different wavelengths.
Figure 4. Three types of reflected waveforms of FBG: (a) Scanning spectrum of the DFB laser;(b) Complete waveform; (c) Incomplete waveform type I; (d) Incomplete waveform type II.
The incomplete waveform repairing algorithm is based on FBG waveform characteristics, suchthat its spectral shape U(n) acquired by the system does not change, but the amplitude of the receivedwaveform will be a little bit different, which is caused by the non-flat-intensity of the wavelength-sweptlight source and the transmission loss disturbance in the FBG sensor network. As shown in Figure 5,the system has acquired the waveforms of one FBG with wavelength shift, and their peak count isfound as a, b, c. It can be seen that their waveforms Ua(n), Ub(n), Uc(n) have different amplitudes.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 4 of 9
3. Incomplete Waveform Repair Algorithm
As shown in Figure 4a, the swept DFB laser has a limited scanning range of 1 nm. In practice, three types of reflected waveforms of FBGs would be obtained: complete waveform, incomplete waveform type I, and incomplete waveform type II, as sketched in Figures 4b–d. In incomplete waveform type I, a small portion of the reflection spectrum of the FBG is out of the laser's scanning range, while the reflection peak remains in the range. In incomplete waveform type II, a large portion of the reflection spectrum including the reflection peak is out of the scanning range. The reflected wavelength of these incomplete waveforms cannot be demodulated by an ordinary Gaussian curve-fitting algorithm [13]. Therefore, in our original demodulation system, considering that the adopted FBG has 200-pm, 3-dB bandwidths and that the incomplete waveform will appear symmetrically in the scanning range of 1 nm, the incomplete waveform type II occupied nearly a 200-pm wavelength range, leaving only an 800-pm dynamic demodulation range left. An efficient incomplete waveform repairing algorithm is proposed in this section.
Figure 4. Three types of reflected waveforms of FBG: (a) Scanning spectrum of the DFB laser; (b) Complete waveform; (c) Incomplete waveform type I; (d) Incomplete waveform type II.
The incomplete waveform repairing algorithm is based on FBG waveform characteristics, such that its spectral shape U(n) acquired by the system does not change, but the amplitude of the received waveform will be a little bit different, which is caused by the non-flat-intensity of the wavelength-swept light source and the transmission loss disturbance in the FBG sensor network. As shown in Figure 5, the system has acquired the waveforms of one FBG with wavelength shift, and their peak count is found as a, b, c. It can be seen that their waveforms Ua(n), Ub(n), Uc(n) have different amplitudes.
0 200 400 600 800 10000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Volta
ge(V
)
Sampling Point
Ua(n) Ub(n) Uc(n) rUb(n) rUc(n)
Figure 5. Normalization process of one FBG at different wavelengths. Figure 5. Normalization process of one FBG at different wavelengths.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 5 of 9
Their similarities are calculated as follows:r[Ua(n), rUb(n)] = 98.59%r[Ua(n), rUc(n)] = 99.77%r[rUb(n), rUc(n)] = 97.85%
(3)
Their similarities are more than 97%, which means that their original waveform Ub(n), Uc(n) couldbe reconstructed under a normalization process by the feature points and the reference waveformUa(n). Therefore, based on this principle, the incomplete waveform can be repaired by a completewaveform as well. The processing procedures are as following:
First, at the initial stage, a waveform type identification based on the waveform symmetryprinciple is designed to judge the types of waveform. As illustrated in Figure 6, the maximum intensitypoint of the waveform is marked as (Np, Vmax), and two points of V3dB are denoted as (Nleft, V3dB) and(Nright, V3dB). Then the symmetry distortion ratio Rsd is obtained:
Rsd =max
{∣∣∣Nle f t − Np
∣∣∣, ∣∣∣Nright − Np
∣∣∣}min
{∣∣∣Nle f t − Np
∣∣∣, ∣∣∣Nright − Np
∣∣∣} (4)
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 5 of 9
Their similarities are calculated as follows:
a b
a c
b c
98.59%
99.77%
9
,
7.8 %
,
, 5
r U n U n
r U n U n
r
r
U nr U n
r
r
(3)
Their similarities are more than 97%, which means that their original waveform Ub(n), Uc(n) could be reconstructed under a normalization process by the feature points and the reference waveform Ua(n). Therefore, based on this principle, the incomplete waveform can be repaired by a complete waveform as well. The processing procedures are as following:
First, at the initial stage, a waveform type identification based on the waveform symmetry principle is designed to judge the types of waveform. As illustrated in Figure 6, the maximum intensity point of the waveform is marked as (Np, Vmax), and two points of V3dB are denoted as (Nleft, V3dB) and (Nright, V3dB). Then the symmetry distortion ratio Rsd is obtained:
max{| |, | |}min{| |,| |}
left p right psd
left p right p
N N N NR
N N N N
(4)
Figure 6. The identification of waveform types.
It can be seen that, with the gradual loss of the wavelength data, the symmetry distortion ratio increases. Therefore, according to the calibrated range of the value of Rsd, we can judge the type of the waveforms to be an complete waveform, incomplete waveform type I, or incomplete waveform type II.
Secondly, we store one complete waveform data for its respective FBG as a reference waveform Ur(n) to do the normalization. For incomplete waveform type I, it still has its peak point which can be set as the feature point. Therefore, it is simpler to do the normalization processing from the Ur(n) based on the coordinate difference of their peak points.
For incomplete waveform type II, as showed in Figure 7, we set the peak point (np, vp) of the acquired incomplete waveform UIn(n) as the feature point. Based on the effective waveform data near this peak point, we could calculate the slope k at this position of the incomplete waveform. However, type II has already lost its real peak point and k is no longer zero, which makes it more complex to figure out the corresponding feature point with the same change rate on Ur(n).
Figure 6. The identification of waveform types.
It can be seen that, with the gradual loss of the wavelength data, the symmetry distortion ratioincreases. Therefore, according to the calibrated range of the value of Rsd, we can judge the type ofthe waveforms to be an complete waveform, incomplete waveform type I, or incomplete waveformtype II.
Secondly, we store one complete waveform data for its respective FBG as a reference waveformUr(n) to do the normalization. For incomplete waveform type I, it still has its peak point which canbe set as the feature point. Therefore, it is simpler to do the normalization processing from the Ur(n)based on the coordinate difference of their peak points.
For incomplete waveform type II, as showed in Figure 7, we set the peak point (np, vp) of theacquired incomplete waveform UIn(n) as the feature point. Based on the effective waveform data nearthis peak point, we could calculate the slope k at this position of the incomplete waveform. However,type II has already lost its real peak point and k is no longer zero, which makes it more complex tofigure out the corresponding feature point with the same change rate on Ur(n).
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 6 of 9
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 6 of 9
Figure 7. Incomplete waveform repair.
Therefore, a rapid way is proposed to solve this problem, in which we simplify the reference waveform Ur(n) to Gaussian function Ugr(n) in an approximate way:
2
exp 4 2 pgr max
left right
n NU n V In
N N
(5)
where, Vmax, Np and Nleft − Nright have already been acquired in the waveform type identification method. Through this Gaussian function Ugr(n), we carry out a fast derivative operation of U'gr(n) and U''gr(n) to figure out the only feature point (nr, vr) with the same slope k. After acquiring the feature points (np, vp) and (nr, vr), as depicted in Figure 7, a normalization process by the stored reference waveform Ur(n) can be conducted to acquire the repaired waveform rUIn(n):
r rIn r p
p
v U nnrU n
vn (6)
At last, the system will calculate the similarity of the rUIn(n) and UIn(n). If the similarity of the overlapping part reaches 97%, a Gaussian peak-seek algorithm [13] will be used to demodulate the center wavelength of the repaired waveform for higher accuracy. When the overlapping part is lower than 97% or the spectrum completely moves out of the detection bandwidth, the waveform cannot be repaired. In order to reduce the occurrence of this situation in practical engineering applications, the working temperature of the DFB laser can be adjusted to match the scanning wavelength center with the wavelength of the FBGs to reserve enough dynamic range.
Moreover, this repairing algorithm is universal for both incomplete waveform type I and type II, and it suggests a very efficient way to realize in our FPGA system, which makes the FBG waveform repairing possible to expand the dynamic demodulation range in practical engineering applications.
4. Experiments and Discussion
4.1. Temperature Experiment
We fabricated 10 identical weak FBGs (FBG#1 to FBG#10) with about a 100-m gap along one optical fiber, and placed them into a thermostat. The center wavelength of FBGs are around 1552.7 nm, and the DFB scans from 1552.6 nm to 1553.6 nm by applying a fixed modulation current and adjusting the internal temperature. Then, we changed the thermostat temperature from −10 °C to 110 °C with a step of 2 °C. In Figure 8, reflected waveforms of FBGs within one complete scanning period are acquired by the demodulation system at 200 MHz sampling rate and 100 kHz repetition rate. The sampling point on the X axis are the counts of the time, and it can be intuitively seen that 10 identical weak FBGs are separated in the time domain and red shifted with the increase of temperature. Figure 8 demonstrates that the system has a multiplexing capability of more than 10 FBGs.
Figure 7. Incomplete waveform repair.
Therefore, a rapid way is proposed to solve this problem, in which we simplify the referencewaveform Ur(n) to Gaussian function Ugr(n) in an approximate way:
Ugr(n) = Vmax exp
−4In2
(n− Np
Nle f t − Nright
)2 (5)
where, Vmax, Np and Nleft − Nright have already been acquired in the waveform type identificationmethod. Through this Gaussian function Ugr(n), we carry out a fast derivative operation of U′gr(n) andU′ ′gr(n) to figure out the only feature point (nr, vr) with the same slope k. After acquiring the featurepoints (np, vp) and (nr, vr), as depicted in Figure 7, a normalization process by the stored referencewaveform Ur(n) can be conducted to acquire the repaired waveform rUIn(n):
rUIn(n) =vrUr(n)
vp−(nr − np
)(6)
At last, the system will calculate the similarity of the rUIn(n) and UIn(n). If the similarity of theoverlapping part reaches 97%, a Gaussian peak-seek algorithm [13] will be used to demodulate thecenter wavelength of the repaired waveform for higher accuracy. When the overlapping part is lowerthan 97% or the spectrum completely moves out of the detection bandwidth, the waveform cannot berepaired. In order to reduce the occurrence of this situation in practical engineering applications, theworking temperature of the DFB laser can be adjusted to match the scanning wavelength center withthe wavelength of the FBGs to reserve enough dynamic range.
Moreover, this repairing algorithm is universal for both incomplete waveform type I and type II,and it suggests a very efficient way to realize in our FPGA system, which makes the FBG waveformrepairing possible to expand the dynamic demodulation range in practical engineering applications.
4. Experiments and Discussion
4.1. Temperature Experiment
We fabricated 10 identical weak FBGs (FBG#1 to FBG#10) with about a 100-m gap along one opticalfiber, and placed them into a thermostat. The center wavelength of FBGs are around 1552.7 nm, andthe DFB scans from 1552.6 nm to 1553.6 nm by applying a fixed modulation current and adjusting theinternal temperature. Then, we changed the thermostat temperature from −10 ◦C to 110 ◦C with a stepof 2 ◦C. In Figure 8, reflected waveforms of FBGs within one complete scanning period are acquired bythe demodulation system at 200 MHz sampling rate and 100 kHz repetition rate. The sampling pointon the X axis are the counts of the time, and it can be intuitively seen that 10 identical weak FBGs are
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 7 of 9
separated in the time domain and red shifted with the increase of temperature. Figure 8 demonstratesthat the system has a multiplexing capability of more than 10 FBGs.Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 7 of 9
Figure 8. Reflected waveforms from 10 FBGs at different temperature.
When the temperature dropped to 10 °C and rose to 90 °C, the reflection waveforms of FBGs became incomplete. We used the waveform repairing method to demodulate the center wavelength at this temperature range. Therefore, the effective waveforms of FBGs can be demodulated from −8 °C to 108 °C. Figure 9 plots the demodulation results of all FBGs where the R-Squares are 0.9988, 0.9990, 0.9989, 0.9990, 0.9993, 0.9969, 0.9988, 0.9992, 0.9976, and 0.9973 in this whole temperature range. It can be seen that the demodulation linearity decreases in the range of below 10 °C and above 90 °C as the incompleteness of the FBG waveform increases. Nevertheless, with an accepted accuracy for practical application, the demodulation range has evidently expanded to the range of −8–10°C and 90–108 °C.
Figure 9. Monitor wavelength shift sensing character of the FBGs in temperature measurement.
The temperature experiment demonstrates that the demodulation system capacity is significantly improved for a quasi-distributed FBG demodulation, and the incomplete waveform repairing algorithm can be used to expand the dynamic demodulation range for FBGs. Compared with the ordinary peak-search algorithm in the original system, which only has an 800-pm dynamic demodulation range, the demodulation range is expanded to 1160 pm which is more than a 40% increase for higher capacity FBGs.
4.2. Vibration Experiment
We carried out a high-speed vibration experiment to verify the 100 kHz demodulation speed of the system. Specifically, a weak FBG was encapsulated as an accelerometer [14], whose architecture consists of an integrative matrix with base, flexible gemels with inertia masses, and an FBG adhered to the bilateral grooves. By using the sequential quadratic programming method, the structural parameters of this FBG accelerometer were designed to reach the highest eigenfrequency of 3.6 kHz, which meets the requirement of this high-frequency vibration experiment. Then we installed it on a vibration test bench built by a Danish B&K instrument which has a maximum vibration frequency of 4 kHz.
Figure 8. Reflected waveforms from 10 FBGs at different temperature.
When the temperature dropped to 10 ◦C and rose to 90 ◦C, the reflection waveforms of FBGsbecame incomplete. We used the waveform repairing method to demodulate the center wavelength atthis temperature range. Therefore, the effective waveforms of FBGs can be demodulated from −8 ◦Cto 108 ◦C. Figure 9 plots the demodulation results of all FBGs where the R-Squares are 0.9988, 0.9990,0.9989, 0.9990, 0.9993, 0.9969, 0.9988, 0.9992, 0.9976, and 0.9973 in this whole temperature range. It canbe seen that the demodulation linearity decreases in the range of below 10 ◦C and above 90 ◦C as theincompleteness of the FBG waveform increases. Nevertheless, with an accepted accuracy for practicalapplication, the demodulation range has evidently expanded to the range of −8–10◦C and 90–108 ◦C.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 7 of 9
Figure 8. Reflected waveforms from 10 FBGs at different temperature.
When the temperature dropped to 10 °C and rose to 90 °C, the reflection waveforms of FBGs became incomplete. We used the waveform repairing method to demodulate the center wavelength at this temperature range. Therefore, the effective waveforms of FBGs can be demodulated from −8 °C to 108 °C. Figure 9 plots the demodulation results of all FBGs where the R-Squares are 0.9988, 0.9990, 0.9989, 0.9990, 0.9993, 0.9969, 0.9988, 0.9992, 0.9976, and 0.9973 in this whole temperature range. It can be seen that the demodulation linearity decreases in the range of below 10 °C and above 90 °C as the incompleteness of the FBG waveform increases. Nevertheless, with an accepted accuracy for practical application, the demodulation range has evidently expanded to the range of −8–10°C and 90–108 °C.
Figure 9. Monitor wavelength shift sensing character of the FBGs in temperature measurement.
The temperature experiment demonstrates that the demodulation system capacity is significantly improved for a quasi-distributed FBG demodulation, and the incomplete waveform repairing algorithm can be used to expand the dynamic demodulation range for FBGs. Compared with the ordinary peak-search algorithm in the original system, which only has an 800-pm dynamic demodulation range, the demodulation range is expanded to 1160 pm which is more than a 40% increase for higher capacity FBGs.
4.2. Vibration Experiment
We carried out a high-speed vibration experiment to verify the 100 kHz demodulation speed of the system. Specifically, a weak FBG was encapsulated as an accelerometer [14], whose architecture consists of an integrative matrix with base, flexible gemels with inertia masses, and an FBG adhered to the bilateral grooves. By using the sequential quadratic programming method, the structural parameters of this FBG accelerometer were designed to reach the highest eigenfrequency of 3.6 kHz, which meets the requirement of this high-frequency vibration experiment. Then we installed it on a vibration test bench built by a Danish B&K instrument which has a maximum vibration frequency of 4 kHz.
Figure 9. Monitor wavelength shift sensing character of the FBGs in temperature measurement.
The temperature experiment demonstrates that the demodulation system capacity is significantlyimproved for a quasi-distributed FBG demodulation, and the incomplete waveform repairingalgorithm can be used to expand the dynamic demodulation range for FBGs. Compared withthe ordinary peak-search algorithm in the original system, which only has an 800-pm dynamicdemodulation range, the demodulation range is expanded to 1160 pm which is more than a 40%increase for higher capacity FBGs.
4.2. Vibration Experiment
We carried out a high-speed vibration experiment to verify the 100 kHz demodulation speed ofthe system. Specifically, a weak FBG was encapsulated as an accelerometer [14], whose architectureconsists of an integrative matrix with base, flexible gemels with inertia masses, and an FBG adheredto the bilateral grooves. By using the sequential quadratic programming method, the structural
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 8 of 9
parameters of this FBG accelerometer were designed to reach the highest eigenfrequency of 3.6 kHz,which meets the requirement of this high-frequency vibration experiment. Then we installed it ona vibration test bench built by a Danish B&K instrument which has a maximum vibration frequencyof 4 kHz.
In the experiment, we drove the FBG accelerometer by a 4 kHz sine vibration signal anddemodulated the reflection signal in our demodulation system. In order to verify the 100 kHzdemodulation speed, we analyzed the sampling points in the time domain and the harmoniccomponent in the frequency domain.
Figure 10a shows the demodulation result in the time domain. In the 4 kHz vibration demodulation,there are 25 sampling points in each vibration cycle, and each sampling interval is 0.01 ms, whichdemonstrates that the demodulation speed has reached 100 kHz. Furthermore, in Figure 10b, we canobtain the complete frequency distribution of the basic frequency and the harmonic frequencies within50 kHz of the vibration signal.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 8 of 9
In the experiment, we drove the FBG accelerometer by a 4 kHz sine vibration signal and demodulated the reflection signal in our demodulation system. In order to verify the 100 kHz demodulation speed, we analyzed the sampling points in the time domain and the harmonic component in the frequency domain.
Figure 10a shows the demodulation result in the time domain. In the 4 kHz vibration demodulation, there are 25 sampling points in each vibration cycle, and each sampling interval is 0.01 ms, which demonstrates that the demodulation speed has reached 100 kHz. Furthermore, in Figure 10b, we can obtain the complete frequency distribution of the basic frequency and the harmonic frequencies within 50 kHz of the vibration signal.
Figure 10. The results of the vibration experiment: (a) Distribution of demodulation in the time domain; (b) Complete frequency analysis of the demodulation result.
5. Conclusions
With a focus on the deficiencies of the high-speed demodulation system based on a DFB laser, this paper proposes two methods to improve its performance. First, weak identical FBGs are used to break the limitation of demodulation capacity. Secondly, an FBG reflection waveform repair algorithm is designed to increase the range of dynamic demodulation for FBGs. The experimental results are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of this performance optimization design. While reserving the advantages of 100 kHz high-speed demodulation, all of the identical weak FBGs are distinguished and demodulated with 0.99 linearity. Additionally, the dynamic demodulation range is expanded by 40% over the original system. Further improvements in laser performance, such as the nonlinear scanning, wavelength scanning speed and spatial resolution, and the multiplexing capacity of the interrogation system can be expected in the future.
Acknowledgments: The research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61575149, 61290311), and Major Project of Hubei Technological Innovation Special Fund (Grant No. 2016AAA008).
Author Contributions: Yiqiang Yao and Zhengying Li conceived and designed the experiments; Yiming Wang designed and test the algorithm; Siqi Liu designed and test the circuits; Yutang Dai fabricated the FBG accelerometer; Zhengying Li wrote the paper; Jianmin Gong and Lixin Wang revised the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Rao, Y.J. In-fibre Bragg grating sensors. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8, 355–375. 2. Li, Z.Y.; Xu, Z.Q.; Tang, Z.H.; Zhao M.; Cai L.J.; Liu, Q. Research of High-Speed FBG Demodulation System
for Distributed Dynamic Monitoring of Mechanical Equipment. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2013, 7, 679–681.
Figure 10. The results of the vibration experiment: (a) Distribution of demodulation in the time domain;(b) Complete frequency analysis of the demodulation result.
5. Conclusions
With a focus on the deficiencies of the high-speed demodulation system based on a DFB laser,this paper proposes two methods to improve its performance. First, weak identical FBGs are used tobreak the limitation of demodulation capacity. Secondly, an FBG reflection waveform repair algorithmis designed to increase the range of dynamic demodulation for FBGs. The experimental results areconducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of this performance optimization design. While reservingthe advantages of 100 kHz high-speed demodulation, all of the identical weak FBGs are distinguishedand demodulated with 0.99 linearity. Additionally, the dynamic demodulation range is expandedby 40% over the original system. Further improvements in laser performance, such as the nonlinearscanning, wavelength scanning speed and spatial resolution, and the multiplexing capacity of theinterrogation system can be expected in the future.
Acknowledgments: The research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.61575149, 61290311), and Major Project of Hubei Technological Innovation Special Fund (Grant No. 2016AAA008).
Author Contributions: Yiqiang Yao and Zhengying Li conceived and designed the experiments; Yiming Wangdesigned and test the algorithm; Siqi Liu designed and test the circuits; Yutang Dai fabricated the FBGaccelerometer; Zhengying Li wrote the paper; Jianmin Gong and Lixin Wang revised the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1472 9 of 9
References
1. Rao, Y.J. In-fibre Bragg grating sensors. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8, 355–375. [CrossRef]2. Li, Z.Y.; Xu, Z.Q.; Tang, Z.H.; Zhao, M.; Cai, L.J.; Liu, Q. Research of High-Speed FBG Demodulation System
for Distributed Dynamic Monitoring of Mechanical Equipment. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2013, 7, 679–681. [CrossRef]3. Tian, S.; Yang, Z.; Chen, X.; Xie, Y. Damage Detection Based on Static Strain Responses Using FBG in a Wind
Turbine Blade. Sensors 2015, 15, 19992–20005. [CrossRef] [PubMed]4. Huang, X.; Liu, Y.; Luo, D.; Wang, G.; Ding, N.; Xu, J. Wavelet analysis on vibration modal frequency
measurement at a low level of strain of the turbine blade using FBG sensors. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009, 21,015305. [CrossRef]
5. Peng, B.J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, J. Tilt sensor with FBG technology and matched FBG demodulatingmethod. IEEE. Sens. J. 2006, 6, 63–66. [CrossRef]
6. Dastmalchi, M.; Doucet, S.; Rusch, L.A.; Larochelle, S. FBG-based matched filters for optical processing of RFsignals. IEEE. Photonics J. 2012, 4, 832–843. [CrossRef]
7. Guo, H.; Xiao, G.; Nezih, M.; Yao, J. Fiber Optic Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Air Platforms.Sensors 2011, 11, 3687–3705. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Li, R.M.; Yu, Y.L.; Shum, P. Addressing fiber Bragg grating sensors with wavelength-swept pulse fiber laserand analog electrical switch. Opt. Commun. 2011, 284, 1561–1564. [CrossRef]
9. Jung, E.J.; Kim, C.-S.; Jeong, M.Y.; Kim, M.K.; Jeon, M.Y.; Jung, W.; Chen, Z. Characterization of FBG sensorinterrogation based on a FDML wavelength swept laser. Opt. Express. 2008, 16, 16552–16560. [PubMed]
10. Lee, B.C.; Jung, E.J.; Kim, C.S.; Jeon, M.Y. Dynamic and static strain fiber Bragg grating sensor interrogationwith a 1.3 µm Fourier domain mode-locked wavelength-swept laser. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 94008–94012.
11. Li, Z.Y.; Sun, W.F.; Li, Z.M.; Wang, H.H. A demodulation method of high-speed fiber Bragg grating based ondispersion-compensating fiber. Acta Phys. Sin. 2015, 64, 234207.
12. Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.M.; Liu, S.Q.; Li, Z.Y. A high-speed FBG interrogation system based on DFB laser.J. Optoelectron. Laser 2015, 26, 1473–1478.
13. Lee, H.W.; Song, M. FBG interrogation with a scanning Fabry-Perot filter and Gaussian line-fitting algorithm.In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society, Sydney, Australia,22–28 October 2005; pp. 963–964.
14. Yin, G.L.; Dai, Y.T.; Karanja, J.M.; Dai, J.X. Optimization design for medium-high frequency FBGaccelerometer with different eigenfrequency and sensitivity. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 235, 311–316.[CrossRef]
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
