Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WesternAustralianPlanning,Commission
July 2009
Greater BunburyRegion SchemeAmendment 0003/41
Waterloo BritkvvOrks
Report bnSubroissions and Sub
=Shire eiDarda-ntip
GOVERNMENT OFWESTERN AUSTRALIA
Greater Bunbury Region SchemeAmendment 0003/41
Waterloo Brickworks
Report on Submissions
Submissions
Shire of Dardanup
WesternAustralianPlanning,Commission
July 2009
© State of Western Australia
Published by theWestern Australian Planning Commission,Albert Facey House,469 Wellington Street,Perth Western Australia 6000
GBRS Amendment 0003/41 Report on Submissions and SubmissionsFile 809-6-9-2 & 809-6-9-2 Pt. 1Published July 2009
ISBN 0 7309 9917 3
Internet: http://www.wapc.wa.gov.aue-mail: [email protected]: (08) 9264 7777Fax: (08) 9264 7566TTY: (08) 9264 7535
Copies of this document are available inalternative formats on application to thedisability services co-ordinator.
Introduction to Greater Bunbury Region Scheme major amendments
The Greater Bunbury Region Scheme (GBRS) sets out the broad pattern of land use for thewhole Greater Bunbury region.
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for keeping the GBRSunder review and initiating changes to best reflect regional planning and development needswhere they are seen as necessary.
An amendment proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the GBRS isregulated by the Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for publicsubmissions to be made on proposed amendments.
For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section41 of the Act), the WAPC considers all the submissions lodged, and publishes itsrecommendations in a report on submissions. This report is presented to the Minister forPlanning and to the Governor for approval. Both Houses of Parliament must then scrutinisethe amendment before it can take legal effect.
In the process of making a substantial amendment to the GBRS, information is published asa public record under the following titles:
Amendment reportThis document is available from the start of the public advertising period of the proposedamendment. It sets out the purpose and scope of the proposal, explains why theamendment is considered necessary, and informs people how they can comment throughthe submission process.
Environmental review reportThe Environmental Protection Authority must consider the environmental impact of anamendment to the GBRS before it can be advertised. Should it require formal assessment,an environmental review is undertaken and made available for information and comment atthe same time as the amendment report.
Report on submissionsThe planning rationale, determination of submissions and the WAPC's recommendations forfinal approval of the amendment, with or without modification, is documented in this report.
SubmissionsThis document contains a reproduction of all written submissions received by the WAPC onthe proposed amendment.
Transcript of hearingsA person who has made a written submission may also choose to appear before a hearingscommittee to express their views. Should a hearing be required, the hearings proceedingsare recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts of any public hearings are reproduced inthis volume.
REPORT ON SUBMISSIONS
Contents
Report on Submissions
1. Introduction 1
2. The Proposed Amendment 1
3. Environmental Protection Authority Advice 2
4. Call for Submissions 3
5. Submissions and Hearings 3
6. Main Issues Raised in Submissions 3
7. Hearings 4
8. Determinations 4
7. Conclusion and Recommendation 4
Schedule 1 Alphabetical Listing of Submissions
Schedule 2 Summary of Submissions and Determinations
Schedule 3 The Amendment Figure as Advertised
Appendix 1 List of Detail Plans as Advertised
Submissions
AMENDMENT 0003/41 TO THE GREATER BUNBURY REGION SCHEME
WATERLOO BRICKWORKS
REPORT ON SUBMISSIONS
1. INTRODUCTION
At its meeting on 21 November 2008 the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC)resolved to proceed with Amendment 0003/41 to the Greater Bunbury Region Scheme(GBRS) in accordance with the provisions of Section 41 of the Planning and DevelopmentAct 2005.
2. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
Purpose
The purpose of the amendment is to transfer portions of Lot 25 Railway Road and Lot 26Waterloo Road, Waterloo, shown in Schedule 3 of this report from Rural zoning to Industrialzoning. The lots abut the existing Waterloo Brickworks, and the intent of the amendment isto facilitate the proposed upgrade and expansion of the brickworks.
The land area proposed to be rezoned is made up of a 24.45 ha portion of Lot 25 RailwayRoad and a 19.76 ha portion of Lot 26 Waterloo Road (total land area to be rezoned44.21ha).
Background
The subject land comprises portion of Lot 25 Railway Road and Lot 26 Waterloo Road,Waterloo and is located approximately 12 kilometres east of the Bunbury city centre and 4kilometres south-west of the Burekup townsite.
The land subject of the proposed amendment abuts the existing Waterloo Brickworks whichhas been operational for at least 40 years. Austral Bricks is seeking to replace the existingbrickworks located on Lot 1 Railway Road and Lots 3 and 4 Waterloo Road, Waterloo with amodern brick manufacturing plant.
The Shire of Dardanup resolved to initiate an amendment to Town Planning Scheme No. 3to implement the required rezoning to facilitate the replacement and expansion of theWaterloo Brickworks on 13 July 2006.
The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) reviewed the proposed amendment and setthe level of assessment as "Scheme Amendment Not Assessed",
The amendment to the Shire of Dardanup Town Planning Scheme No. 3, was submitted tothe Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for final approval on 1 November2007. The Greater Bunbury Region Scheme (GBRS) came into effect on 29 November2007. The requirements of the Planning and Development Act 2005 prevent the Ministerfrom approving an amendment to a local planning scheme that is inconsistent with a regionscheme, and as such an amendment to the GBRS is required.
Discussion
The Waterloo Brickworks, located on the corner of Waterloo and Railway Roads, Waterloo,has been in operation for more than 40 years. The existing brickworks provides buildingproducts for the local construction industry. Additionally clay is sourced from deposits thatexist in the area.
It is estimated that the population of the Greater Bunbury area will exceed 100,000 by 2031.This increase in population will result in a proportionate increase in the demand for housingconstruction and therefore building products.
An upgrade and expansion of the existing brickworks has been proposed. The key featuresof the proposed brick manufacturing plant are as follows:
o capacity to increase output from the current production levels of 4 million bricks peryear to 75 million bricks per year;
o reduced environmental impact compared with the existing plant, by using natural gasfiring and latest gas scrubber technology;
o replacement of the existing buildings and infrastructure; ando increasing the size of the existing product display yard and sales office/brickmart.
The proposal is subject to environmental assessment in respect to the amendment and aspart of the Works Approval required by the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Factorsconsidered in the environmental assessment include:
o flora and fauna;o wetlands;o acid sulfate soils;
noise;stormwater management;
o dust management;o air emission management; ando odour management.
The application for works approval has been lodged with the Department of Environmentand Conservation and is waiting approval.
An amendment to the GBRS is required to facilitate the expansion and upgrade of thebrickworks as the land subject of this amendment is currently zoned Rural under theprovisions of the GBRS, and as such an industrial use, such as a brickworks, would beinconsistent with the purpose of the rural zoning.
3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY ADVICE
The proposed amendment was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) foradvice as to whether environmental assessment would be required.
The EPA has advised that the proposed amendment does not require formal assessmentunder Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. A copy of the notice from the EPA ispublished in the WAPC amendment report.
2
4. CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS
The proposed amendment was advertised in the Government Gazette and remained openfor public submissions from 27 March 2009 until 26 June 2009, a period exceeding threemonths.
The proposed amendment was made available for public inspection during ordinarybusiness hours at:
i) Department for Planning and Infrastructure, 469 Wellington Street, Perth.
ii) Department for Planning and Infrastructure, 61 Victoria Street, Bunbury.
iii) the municipal offices of the City of Bunbury, Shires of Capel, Dardanup andHarvey.
iv) State Reference Library, Northbridge.
During the public inspection period, notice of the amendment was published in The WestAustralian and The Sunday Times newspapers and relevant local newspapers circulating inthe locality of the amendment.
All of the owners of land, the subject of and surrounding the proposed amendment, wereforwarded a copy of the amendment report and advised of the opportunity and procedure formaking submissions.
5. SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS
Six submissions on the amendment were received. An alphabetical ndex of all the personsand organisations that lodged submissions is at Schedule 1.
All submissions supported or had no objections to the amendment.
A summary of each submission with WAPC comments and determinations is at Schedule 2A complete copy of all written submissions is also contained in this publication.
6. MAIN ISSUES RAISED IN SUBMISSIONS
All submissions received were from government agencies or infrastructure providers.Submissions of no objection or comment on the proposal were received from the WestNetEnergy (Submission 1) Main Roads Western Australia (Submission 2), Department ofEnvironment and Conservation (Submission 3), Department of Mines and Petroleum(Submission 4), Water Corporation (Submission 5) and Department of Agriculture and FoodWestern Australia (Submission 6).
The submissions are summarised in Schedule 2. Some of the submissions also provideadvice regarding matters which should be considered in the implementation phase.
Response
These comments have been noted and can be considered when more detailed planningprocesses are undertaken, at the time of any development applications.
7. HEARINGS
The Planning and Development Act 2005 provides that where a submission contains anobjection to an amendment, the WAPC is required to offer the person making thesubmission the opportunity of being heard by a committee formed by the WAPC for thatpurpose.
However in this case, as no objections were received, no hearings were requested and assuch were not required.
8. DETERMINATIONS
The determinations on the individual submissions are contained in Schedule 2.
9. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This report summarises the history and background to Amendment No. 0003/41 andexamines the various submissions made. The Western Australian Planning Commissionthanks all those who made submissions.
After considering the submissions, the Western Australian Planning Commission is satisfiedthat the amendment as shown generally on Figure 1 (Schedule 1) and in detail on GBRSAmendment Plan No. 3.2303 should be approved and finalised.
Having regard to the above, the WAPC recommends that the Minister for Planning presentthe amendment to His Excellency the Governor for his consideration and approval andsubsequently commend the amendment to both Houses of Parliament.
4
SCHEDULE 1
ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF SUBMISSIONS
Alphabetical Listing of Submissions
GBRS Amendment 0003/41
Waterloo Brickworks
Submission Number Name
6 Agriculture and Food, Department of
Environment and Conservation, Department of
2 Main Roads WA
4 Mines and Petroleum, Department of
Water, Department of
Westnet Energy (Alinta)
SCHEDULE 2
SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS AND DETERMINATIONS
Submission:
Submitted by:
Nature of Interest:
Affected Land:
Summary of Submission:
1
WestNetEnergy
Infrastructure Provider
Lot 25 Railway Road and Lot 26 WaterlooRoad, Waterloo
Conditional Support
1. Advised of proponents responsibilities in respect to the Gas Network.
Planning Comment:
1. No comment
Determination:
Submission noted
Submission:
Submitted by:
Nature of Interest:
Affected Land:
Summary of Submission:
1.
2
Main Roads Western Australia
Government Agency
Lot 25 Railway Road and Lot 26 WaterlooRoad, Waterloo
Conditional Support
No objection, provided the developer upgrades the intersection ofWaterloo Road and the South Western Highway.
Planning Comment:
Noted but matter should be addressed at the development stage by theShire of Dardanup and MRWA.
Determination:
Submission noted
Submission: 3
Submitted by: Department of Environment andConservation
Nature of Interest: Government Agency
Affected Land: Lot 25 Railway Road and Lot 26 WaterlooRoad, Waterloo
Summary of Submission: No objection
1. No objection to the proposal.
Planning Comment:
1. No comment
Determination:
Submission noted
Submission: 4
Submitted by: Department of Mines and Petroleum
Nature of Interest: Government Agency
Affected Land: Lot 25 Railway Road and Lot 26 WaterlooRoad, Waterloo
Summary of Submission: No objection
1. No objection to the proposal.
Planning Comment:
1. No comment
Determination:
Submission noted
2
Submission:
Submitted by:
Nature of Interest:
Affected Land:
Summary of Submission:
5
Water Corporation
Infrastructure provider
Lot 25 Railway Road and Lot 26 WaterlooRoad, Waterloo
Conditional support
1. No objection in principle, however the change in land use at the sitemeans that the Water Corporation will no longer have a mandate tomaintain the rural drain located within the subject land. As such theWater Corporation requests as a condition of development that thedeveloper either, decommission, modify or redevelop the section ofdrain within the land parcel to the satisfaction of the Water Corporation.
Planning Comment:
Noted but matter should be addressed at the development stage by theShire of Dardanup and the Water Corporation.
Determination:
Submission noted
Submission:
Submitted by:
Nature of Interest:
Affected Land:
Summary of Submission:
6
Department of Agriculture and FoodWestern Australia (DAFWA)
Government Agency
Lot 25 Railway Road and Lot 26 WaterlooRoad, Waterloo
No objection and comments
No objection to the proposal
2. Recommends that the remaining portions of Lots 25 and 26 beamalgamated to form a larger lot which is more appropriate for theRural zoning, and will reduce the potential for the two small parcels ofland to be utilised as lifestyle blocks which may result in land useconflicts.
3. Development to be in accordance with the EPA guidelines 'SeparationDistances between Industrial and Sensitive Land Uses'.
Planning Comment:
1. No comment
2. The proposed development at the site will require an adjustment to lotboundaries, the comments provided by DAFWA will be consideredduring the subdivision/amalgamation process.
3. The proponent has conducted an Environmental Assessment inaccordance with the guidelines. In addition the proposed amendmenthas been assessed by the EPA.
Determination:
Submission noted
4
SCHEDULE 3
THE AMENDMENT FIGURE AS ADVERTISED
CA233763010
CA1107857
CAI 107873
CA11078A1..74 az
CA23376
--CAI8397
95
czp,olqPN 0
4
32
24
tri frat , ,41 a ,ibt w vat SleS Sin&
25 26
5
Waterloo Brickworks Proposed Major Amendment 0003/41Portion Lot 25 Railway Road and Portion Lot 26 Waterloo Road, Waterloo
21 November 2008 As Advertised Figure
Induselnl zono
Legend Ex' n
r=
rural zone
Industrial zone
railway reservation
primary regional roads reservation
WesternAustralian
CPlanning0 POO
Commission
APPENDIX 1
LIST OF DETAIL PLANS AS ADVERTISED
Detail plans
3.2304
Waterloo Brickworks
Proposed major amendment
Amendment 0003/41
as advertised
3.2303
00 ort. A6 J14 FAX 61+81:94 32 3717 1VNG VI 001 /001
61+8+9492 3717
Facsimile Submission 112-14 The Esplanade Postal Contact WestNetEnergyPERTH WA 6000 Address Numbers
P.O. Box 8491Perth BC 6849
Ph (08) 6213 7000Fx (08) 6213 7400
A division of Annie Asset Management Ply LtdABM 52 104 352 650
To: TONY EVANSVVAPC
From: LEWIS SEARLEDRAFTSMAN
Date: 6 April 2009
Fax No: 9791 0576
No. of pages: 1 (Including this page)
For any queries regarding the transmission of this facsimile please telephone: 6213 7000Please reply on facsimile number: 6213 7400
Our Ref:809-6-9-2 PTA
Your Ref: 809-6-0-2 PTA
RE:PROPOSED GREATER SUNBURY REGIONAL SCHEME AMENDMENT 0003/41WATERLOO - RURAL TO INDUSTRIAL. - PORTIONS OF LOT 25 RAILWAYS ROAD AND LOT
26 WATERLOO ROAD, WATERLOO (WATERLOO BRICKWORKS)
Thank you for your letter dated 30 March, 2009 concerning the above mentioned proposal.
A plan will be attached to this fax if there are gas mains in the area. In any case you or thedeveloper must contact Dail Before You Dig (1100) to reference Gas Network changes Immediatelyprior to the proposal going ahead.
If the Gas Network is affected by the proposal and WestNet Energy works are required, then thefollowing conditions must be :net.
All work carried out on WAGas Networks existing Network to accommodate the proposedsubdivision /amalgamation or any development will be at the proponents expense.
WestNet Energy requires one month's notice prick to the commencement of the work on site.Notice should be given to the Project Coordinator on Ph.9499 5166.
Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Yours Faithfully
L.SEARLEGIS Draftsperson
ttr
°MURCIA or
WesternAustralia
Engthias: Jason Glck on (08) 9725 5664Our Re 05/3004Your Rub 809.6-92P11
Planning OfficerWestern Australian Planning Commission61 Victoria StreetBUNBURY WA 6230
ATTENTION: KATH LA NAUZE
Dear Kath
mainroadsWESTERN AUSTRALIA
ABN: 50 860 676 021
Submission 28 April 2009
LOT 25 RAILWAY ROAD AND LOT 26 WATERLOO ROAD, WATERLOO w PROPOSEDREZONING TO INDUSTRIAL
Thank you for your !otter of 30 March 2009 seeking Main Roads comment on this proposal.
Main Roads has no objection to the proposal, In principle, however requests a condition beimposed requiring the developer to upgrade the intersection of Waterloo Road and theSouth Western Highway.
If you require any further Information please contact me on (08) 9725 5664.
Yours faithfully7,4
Jason GickROAD CORRIDOR PLANNING MANAGER
AustralanththncssExcellenceP.000h
Novo Awnrd 2007
DEPARTMENT FOR PLANNINC,AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SUNBURY OFFICE
1 4 APR 2009
LEI
South Wast Re91on, Robnnson Oriva, Banbury or PO Box 6010, Sunbury Western Australia 6231Tolophonat (06) 0725 6677 FaccInalot (05) 9726 5666
Email: s::rap @rnalnroadssra.gov.nu Websito: unyttunalnroadawa.gov.au
l,stl Alt?.9
"/ \P" Depar rut of Your ref 80 0-21-8 1
IC? Environment and ConservationEnquiries: Tracy Teed°
c Our rer: SRS 24988 2000/003720
NN AU5 Phone: 9725 4300
Fax: 0725 4351
EmaIU [email protected],ou
Submission 3
Western Australian Planning CommissionSouth West Office, Sixth Floor,Sunbury Tower, 61 Victoria StreetBUNBURY WA 6230
ATTENTION: Ms Kati La Nauze
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION REF 809-6-9-2 PT 1APPLICATION NO : CMS AMENDMENT 0003/41 PORTIONS OF LOT 25 RAILWAYROAD AND LOT 26 WATERLOO ROAD, WATERLOO (WATERLOO BRICKWORKS)
In response to your correspondence regarding the above application, the Department ofEnvironment and Conservation (DEC) has assessed the proposal and has no objections tothe application.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application. Please contact Tracy Teede atthe DEC South West Region office (9725 4300) If you have any queries regarding thisadvice.
7
V('
For Regional Manager
'14 April 2009
DEPAPRTMENIFoRTiWk,'AND INFRASillUCI Wilt '1AUNBURY OFFICE
1 6 APR 2009
South Wool fte0o1Phone: (08)
Postal Address: PO Box 1693, t tnbt
Ilunburyic. 03) 9225 4351tern Austolia 6231
www.dasm.gov,OU
RE: GREATER BUNBURY REGION SCHEME NOTIFICATION TO REFERRAL ... Page 1 of I
La Maze, Rath
From; PAGOTTO, John idohn.PAGOTTOgdmpayamolcau)
Sent: Thursday, 28 May 2009 3:46 PM
To: La Noun, Roth
Subject: RE: GREATER SUNBURY REGION SCHEME NOTIFICATION TO REFERRAL AGENCIES
HI Kalb,
I confirm it was In reference to Amendment 0003/41.
Regards
Kevin FullerNg Executive OfficerMineral Titles DivisionDepartment of Mine3
From: La Name, Rath (mallto:Kath.tottatneAdphwasoo.eu)Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2009 8:35 AMTo: PAGOTTO, JohnSubject: RE: GREATER SUNBURY REGION SCHEME NOTIFICATION TO REFERRAL AGENCIES
Submission 4
HI Kevin,
Thanks for you common:5 for ourrecords could you for tno :hal those are In Sumo to Amendment 0003(41 (Waterloo Orldcworks).
Kara La ManseSenior Plannln0 OfficerOnparlmont for PIonnIng and Intrastruchnodon: 0, 61 Victoria Shoot, Sunbury, WA 6230Ph: (On) 9701 0577Fax: (GB) 0701 0576EntoffiColladaficALCIPillo for 1111
Please nolo lam only In tho office Monday, Wednesday 8 Thursday
DA Pleas& Ceasidn elmenthonnntt beet. prIntlit9 my e malt
From: PAGOTTO, John (malIto:)ohn.PAGOTTOVdmp.waRoy.att)Sent; Monday, 25 May 2000 4:40 P21Tot La flame, RathSubject: RE: GREATER SUNBURY REGION SCHEME 1101INCATION TO REFERRAL AG ES
Fli Rath,
DOIR (now DMP) previously commented on this same proposal to the Shiro of IJardanup as follows "Apart from clay, which Is used In themanufacture of bricks by Me proponent, the proposal does not nffect access to any known mineral resources. Consequently the Department has
no objections".
DMP has also contacted Mo affected tenement holders and no objections %wife received.
This Department therefore does not oppose the proposal, with tho previous comments (as Indented above) attached.
Regards
Kevin FullerNg Executive 011icorMineral Titles DivisionDRPrld_niultLeMOUNtretfinin100 Plain StreetEast Perth WA 0000Tel: 9222 3235 Fax: 9222 3700
lelnladalloedMILWO,OPYAM
DMP Re 278-01Voln2
OTSCERIHER: Tint ei),11, including airy , Jot, di I cal s rot u Mac addressee to)and ray contain confidential and/or t.J3 ii train, it inn nil y 1 b thi nhlect Of legal Privilege,Tr you are not the intended realms tit, ion: 1 t tint d: 2iloo: or u u t ho b,l ore ikton contained in it.In this case, please 10) rte know by it Win i .1), d Jr 1, in in, ,it ly from your nyotcia and don y any copies.
11efore you take any action based upon &Mx( to 1/c !tam r .lien mint ,b, In Lid. t }Oil Ili° letcarefully consider the advice and inter, (inn n,r t in ten ,.,tit Sn try id id.
tin, dt h +iit', 1. In nerd orgy II 21i t hr Et-dri Lc (..
and r cort,ln confidential and/or p.' 0 1 I to loi 0,1 on nti r ti Ott r :do rat of leo +1If you in not the intended recipient, not dti tin t i contain( d in TT.In thic to nlease let cc know by return ill, th tr ini ` lit: minim fun , ,ir a.t in and destroy any col/too.
Iiiifore you take any action based upon adylci. e and/or intorcation contained in thin email you shouldcareful ly consider the advice and inrornation and consider obtaining relevant independent advice.
28/05/2009
809-6-9-2 Pt IBY1 2003 00126 V01Garry Crowd9791 0423
11 June, 2009
SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLevel 6, Bunbury Tower61 Victoria StreetBUNBTJRY WA 6230
Submission 5
DEPARTMENT FOR BLAKEAND INFRASTRUCTURE:
SUNBURY OFFICE
Dear Sir
CORPORATION
South West Reeler'3rd Floor, Bunbury Tower61 Victoria Street, Bunbury 6230
PO Box 305Bunbury 6231Western Australia
Tel (08) 9791 0100Fax (08) 9791 2280
www.stotercorporation,cormau
PROPOSED GREATER BUNBURY REGION SCHEME AMENDMENT 0003/41WATERLOO RURAL to INDUSTRIAL -- PORTIONS of LOT 25 RAILWAY RDand LOT 26 WATERLOO RD (WATERLOO BRICKWORKS)
I refer to your letter of 30 March 2009 and advise that the Water Corporation has noobjection to the proposed amendment subject to the following.
A rural drain maintained by the Water Corporation exists within the land parcel. Thechange of land use will result in this drain no longer serving a rural land use for themost upstream portion of the drain which is within the development. As such theWater Corporation will no longer have a mandate to operate and maintain the drain.
The Corporation requests that a requirement of the proposed Amendment 0003/41 bethat the developer shall either
o Decommission the section of drain within the land parcel to the satisfaction ofthe Water Corporation or
o Modify or redevelop the drain for internal drainage purposes with any off sitedischarge to the Water Corporation rural drainage network requiring WaterCorporation written approval. Such discharge, should it be necessary, shall notexceed pre-development quantity and flow rate, nor will it cause deteriorationof pre-development water quality in any form.
Pleas contact the undersigned should you have any queries ission.
Yours sine -rely
ry Crowdant Leadel, Ploputty Services
Planning and Development Act 2005Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)
Form 41
SubmissionGreater Bunbury Region Scheme Amendment 0003/4
To: SecretaryWestern Australian Planning CommissionLevel 6, 61 Victoria StreetSunbury WA 6230
DEPARTMENT FOR PLANNINGAND NFRASTRUCTURE
13UNBLIRY OFFICE
19 JUIN 2009
Jaterloo Brickworks eR /30,-7 7/
orrice use ONO
14'''ClIntIlq, inn NI offirre
Sub:risSion 6
Namer CIfuir.e_ 0, tt rob (bA r
( 1.rASE PRINT CLEARLY)
'Actress Pc Ray I / PostcodeCa3./
Contact phone number 7780 Email address lean. UCCft jJc aric. W0i(JL/.0
Submission (Please attach additional pages If required. It Is preferred that any additional Information he loose rather than hound)
CO04 r e e- CIOL 771
turn over to complete your submission
Hearing of submissions
Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment has the opportunity to personally present thebasis of their submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC. You d6 not have to attend a hearing. Thecomments presented by you in this written submission will be considered in determining the recommendationfor the proposed amendment.
For information about the submission and hearings process, please refer to the amendment report and inparticular appendix D.
Please choose one of the following:
No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
I will be represented by:LI Myself My telephone number (business hours):
or
A spokesperson
Name of spokesperson:Contact telephone number (business hours):Postal address:
I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
ORPrivate (only the people, nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
permitted to attend)
You should be aware that:
o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom or Information Act 1992 and as such submissions made to the WAPC may besubject to applications for access under the Act.
O In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making Its report on these submissions, copies of yoursubmission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.
o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, arepresented to the Minister for Planning and published as public records should the Minister approve the proposedamendment. The WAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions.
Signature 1140
To be signed by person(s) making the submission
Date fa/6/(1
Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close ofbusiness (5pm) on 26 June 2009. Late submissions will NOT be considered.
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 9799 0577; Fax - (08) 9791 0576; Email; [email protected]; Websile - httplAwniv.wapc.wa.gov.au
Department of Agriculture and FoodGovernment of Western Australia
SecretaryWAPCLevel 6, 61 Victoria StreetSUNBURY WA6230
Dear Sir/Madam
Your Ref: 809-6-9-2 P1 1
Our Ref:
Enquiries: Leon van Wyk
Date: 16 June 2009
COMMENT: GBRS AMENDMENT 3/41 WATERLOO RURAL TO INDUSTRIALPORTIONS OF LOT 25 RAILWAY RD AND LOT 26 WATERLOO RD, WATERLOO
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rezoning of the abovementionedlots in the Shire of Dardanup from "Rural"to "Industrial".
The Department of Agriculture and Food (DAFWA) supports the proposed rezoning inprinciple, but recommends the following issues in relation to the rezoning should beconsidered:
o DAFWA recommends that the remainder of lots 25 and 26 he amalgamated into one lot.This will create a larger lot which is more appropriate for the "Rural"zoning and It will alsodiscourage the possibility of two small lifestyle lots between to the "Rural" and "Industrial'zone. If the remainder of the lots are not amalgamated and it is then primarily used aslifestyle lots it will significantly increase the potential for land use conflict with both theadjoining "Rural"and "Industrial' land.
o Any changed land use on agricultural land needs to include buffers on the re-zoned landto minimise land use conflict. To ensure agricultural operations on land next to re-zonedareas are not restricted, DAFWA recommends minimum setbacks/buffers of 500 metres,be incorporated into re-zoned areas in accordance with the EPA guidelines: SeparationDistances between Industrial and Sensitive Land Uses. These guidelines set outminimum separation distances for a range of agricultural activities including marketgardens, orchards and dairies and are available on the EPA's website atwww.epa.wa.gov.au/docs/1840 GS3.pdf
If you have queries regarding the comments, please contact Leon van Wyk on (08) 9780 6171.
Yours sincerely,
11-17 .ails'
,Heather f dreyProject Mandger, Natural Resource Management (South West)Department of Agriculture and Food (WA)
South Western Highway, Bunbury Western Australia 6230Postal address: PO Box 1231, Bunbury, WA 6230
Telephone: (08) 9780 6100 Facsimile: (08) 9780 6136
