Water Tank Report

8/17/2019 Water Tank Report

1/50

WATER TANK STEEL FOUNDATION CALCULATION

DATA

Water tank type 2 (shop drawing attached)

Frame load distribution (Live Load) :

- Frame = ! = 2"#t$m% & ('"#m'"!*#m) = 2"+,+# t$m

2 = 2"#t$m% & !"#m = "+# t$m

- Frame = = 2"#t$m% & !"#m = "+# t$m

- Frame = ! = 2"#t$m% & ('"#m'"!*#m) = !"2,+# t$m

- Frame = = 2"#t$m% & !"#m = "+# t$m

W./01 /.3 W= 't

WATER TANK 3mx4mW= 30t

WATER TANK 3mx4mW= 30t

!''mm

2+''mm

2+''mm

!2#'mm

2*+'mm

1

2

4

3

1

= 't$m&4m = 2"#t$m%

2

3

4

A

B

C

DE

F


2/50


5olumn 10.5/67 (3)8 9

. '"2! '"4 2"+2

; 2'"2, -4", !#!"'2

5 !4"4! 4"## !!'"*

< -'"2! '"4 2"+2

0 -2'"2, -4", !#!"'2

F -!4"4! 4"## !!'"*

2" 70/ (3m)

A

B

C

D

E

F

AB

C

D

E

F


3/50


" >- 1atio

4" ?hear


4/50


#" 2''' analysisA ma&imum de@ection is '"+#4! mm


5/50


LOADING

Load combination:

!"2


6/50


6. Wei!t C"m#$%i&"' (et)ee' W$te% T$'* C"'+%ete F",'-$ti

$'- W$te% T$'* Stee F",'-$ti"'

Weight comparison based on ultimate de@ection" 5alculation oB

de@ection by ?.>2'''

>revious design using concrete Boundation

odeling water tank concrete Boundation by ?.>2'''

ABC


7/50

2'''

Cltimate de@ection obtained by concrete Boundation load is +"!* m


odeling water tank steel Boundation by ?.>2'''

2'''

Cltimate de@ection obtained by concrete Boundation load is "',! m

oment 5alculation by ?.>2''' (3m)

oment due weight oB concrete Boundation (3m)


8/50


SU//AR

!A .Bter being analysed oB > ratio by ?.>2'''A it could be concluded

that steel Boundation is capable oB supporting water tank

2A Cltimate de@ection by concrete Boundation is greater than the one by

steel BoundationA meaning that the weight obtained by steel Boundatiis smaller than the one by concrete BoundationA hence the weight oB s

Boundation is considered structurally saBe"

Cltimate


9/50

Boudnation is considered structurally saBe"

Cltimate oment


10/50

oment ma& obtained by steel Boundation load is 4#"** 3m


11/50

WATER TANK STEEL FOUNDATION CALCULATIO

DATA

Water tank type (shop drawing attached)


- Frame = ! = "$m% & !"#m = 4"# t$m

- Frame = = "t$m% & ('"#m '"2+m) = 4"'*2

- Frame = ! = "$m% & !"#m = 4"# t$m

WATER TANK 3mx3m

W= 30t

WATER TANK 3mx3m

W= 30t

1

2

32+''mm

2+''mm

!,,#mm #+#mm

W./01 /.3 W= 't

1

2

3

= 't$m&m = "t$m%

A

B

E

C

D

F


12/50

page !


5olumn 10.5/67 (3)8 9

. '"! -*"* #2"*#

; 2"4! *"+! !*"*

5 '"! -'"! !"*!

< -'"!* -*"*2 #2"#+

0 -2"4 *"*! !+"!!

F -'"# '"', '"#

2" 70/ (3m)

A

B

C

D

F

G

A

D

B

C

E

F


13/50

page


" >- 1atio

4" ?hear


14/50

page 4


#" 2''' analysisA ma&imum de@ection is !"'


15/50

page #


LOADING

Load combination:

!"2


16/50

page 2


"' 6. Wei!t C"m#$%i&"' (et)ee' W$te% T$'* C"'+%ete

$'- W$te% T$'* Stee F",'-$ti"'

Weight comparison based on ultimate de@ection" 5alculatio



odeling water tank concrete Boundation by ?.>2'''

BC


17/50

2'''

Cltimate de@ection obtained by concrete Boundation load is

page *



2'''

Cltimate de@ection obtained by concrete Boundation load is


oment due weight oB concrete Boundation (3m)


18/50

page +


SU//AR

!A .Bter being analysed oB > ratio by ?.>2'''A it could be co

that steel Boundation is capable oB supporting water tank

2A Cltimate de@ection by concrete Boundation is greater than t

n steel BoundationA meaning that the weight obtained by steeteel is smaller than the one by concrete BoundationA hence the


Cltimate


19/50

Boudnation is considered structurally saBe"

Cltimate oment


20/50

oment ma& obtained by steel Boundation load is 2! 3m

page


21/50

N WATER TANK STEEL FOUNDATION CA

DATA

Water tank type 4 (shop drawing attached)


- Frame = ! = 2"*,t$m% & ('"4#m'"22

2 = 2"*t$m% & !"'!m = 2"+'*

- Frame = ! = 2"*,t$m% & !"+*+#m = 4"+

2 = 2"*,t$m% & '"22#m = '"*2

- Frame = ! = 2"*,t$m% & !"2+#m = "

2 = 2"*t$m% & !"'!m = 2"+'*

t$m - Frame = ! = 2"*,t$m% & '"22#m = '"*

2 = 2"*,t$m% & !"+*+#m = 4"+

- Frame = ! = 2"*,t$m% & '"##+#m = !"4

- Frame = ! = 2"*,t$m% & !"''2#m = 2"*

2 = 2"*,t$m% & !"2+#m = "

- Frame = ! = 2"*,t$m% & '"22#m = '"*2 = 2"*,t$m% & !"+*+#m = 4"+

##mm

2+''mm

2'2'mm 2'2'mm 24+#mm 2''*mm

WATER TANK 4mxm

W= t

WATER TANK 4mxm

W= t

1 3 6

2

2

4

4

1

2

3

4

= +

6

A

BC

DE

F

G

I

K


22/50

page !


5olumn 10.5/67 (3)8 9

. !"2+ -2" 4"2*

; 4"4, -2*"2 2!#"*

5 2"4 -!+"4* 2+"24

< -2"'# -!+"4 2+"!,

0 -*"+, -4"* "!+

F !"4+ "'+ #"'

E 4"* 2"'! 2!,"!+

2", !4",4 2,2"4

6 -!", !4",! 2,2" G -*"+! #"# !!+",

3 !"4 '"'4 !"++

L -'"4+ '"'+ !"!

-'",# !"+ 2+"*,

2" 70/ (3m)

A

B

C

DE

F

G

I

K

A

B

C

DE

A

F

G

I


23/50

page


" >- 1atio

4" ?hear


24/50

page 4


#" 2''' analysisA ma&imum de@ect


25/50

page #


LOADING

Load combination:

!"2


26/50

page 2


F",'-$ti"' 6. Wei!t C"m#$%i&"' (et)ee' W$te% T$'*

$'- W$te% T$'* Stee F",'-$ti"'

n oB Weight comparison based on ultimate de@ection"



odeling water tank concrete Boundation by ?.>2

A


27/50

2'''

!"4,! mm Cltimate de@ection obtained by concrete Boundati

page *



2'''

'"4+, mm Cltimate de@ection obtained by concrete Boundati


omen due weight oB concrete Boundation (3m)


28/50

page +


SU//AR

cluded !A .Bter being analysed oB > ratio by ?.>2'''A it c

that steel Boundation is capable oB supporting wat

he one by 2A Cltimate de@ection by concrete Boundation is grea

l Boundation steel BoundationA meaning that the weight obtaineight oB steel is smaller than the one by concrete BoundationA h


enceCltimate


29/50


30/50

oment ma& obtained by steel Boundation load is

page


31/50

CULATION WATER TANK STEEL FOUND

DATA

Water tank type ! (shop drawing attac

Frame = 2''&2''&,&!2

Frame = 2#'&2#'&&!4

Fy = 2#' pa

#m) = "!* t$m Fu = 4'' pa

t$m

* t$m Frame load distribution (Live Load) :

! t$m - Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"!2#

*# t$m

t$m - Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

! t$m

* t$m - Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

4! t$m

- Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

*+ t$m

*# t$m - Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

! t$m* t$m - Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

- Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

- Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

- Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

- Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

- Frame = = ",#t$m% & !"44m

t$4m&+m = 2"*,t$m%

L/

WATER TANK 13mx6m

W= 300 t

WATER TANK 13mx6m

W= 300 t1

1

2

3

5

5

4

!2

!2

!

!

2+'' 2+'' 222# 44'' !2#

1

2

3

4

6

5

!'

!!


32/50

page !


- Frame = ! = ",#t$m% & 2"2m

2 = ",#t$m% & '"*

- Frame = ! = ",#t$m% & '"*

2 = ",#t$m% & !"!2

- Frame = ! = ",#t$m% & !"!2

2 = ",#t$m% & !"+*

- Frame = 2 = ",#t$m% & !"+*

LOADING

Load combination:

!"2


33/50

page


!" 5olumn reaction (3)

5olumn10.5/67 (

8 9

. '",# -'"!

; '"## -'"!2

5 4"'2 -'"!

< !"#! -"**

0 -!," -2*"4!

F "+ -!+"4

E !2"2 -24"!2

-2!"2 -!4"++

6 !"!, '

G '"#, '

3 +"+2 '

L ,"' '

-*"#2 '

+"24 '

7 2"++ '

> -4" '

H '",# '"!1 '"## '"!2

? 4"'2 '"!

L

/

K

L

/

A

B

C D

E

I

K L

7

R

S


34/50

/ !"#! "**

C -!," 2*"4!

I "+ !+"4

W !2"2 24"!2

8 -2!" !4"++

page 4


" >- 1atio

ion is 4"+'+ mm

4" ?hear


35/50

.ccording to ?.>2''' analysisA ma&imu

page #


6. Wei!t C"m#$%i&"' (et)ee' W$

$'- W$te% T$'* Stee F",'-$ti"'

Weight comparison based on ultimate dde@ection by ?.>2'''

>revious design using concrete Boundati

sign)

odeling water tank concrete Boundatio

2'''

K

L

/


36/50

Cltimate de@ection obtained by concret

page 2


"'+%ete F",'-$ti"' odeling water tank steel Boundation b

5alculation oB

''' 2'''

Cltimate de@ection obtained by concret


37/50

on load is !"++! mm

page *



omen due weight oB concrete Boundati

on load is '"4++ mm


38/50

Cltimate moment obtained by concrete

page +


omen due weight oB steel Boundation

uld be concluded

er tank

ter than the one by

d by steel Boundation nce the weight oB steel


39/50


40/50

ACltimate oment by concrete Boundatio

steel BoundationA meaning that the wei

is smaller than the one by concrete Bou

Boudnation is considered structurally sa

Cltimate oment

5oncrete Foundation ?teel Fo

!2"! 3m 2,"+

!"+ 3m

page


41/50

TION CALCULATION

ed)

= 4" t$m

& 2 = !!"',, t$m

& 2 = !!"',, t$m

& 2 = !!"',, t$m

& 2 = !!"',, t$m

& 2 = !!"',, t$m

= #"#44 t$m

= #"#44 t$m

= #"#44 t$m

= #"#44 t$m

= #"#44 t$m

6

!' !!

!' !!

!4

!4 !#

!# 2,,'

2,,'

22#' #2#

= ''t$!m&*m =",#t$m%


42/50

page !

TION CALCULATION

= ,"4+ t$m

#m = "+! t$m

#m = "+! t$m

m = 4" t$m

m = 4" t$m

#m = *"+ t$m

#m = *"+ t$m

ethods


43/50

page 2

TION CALCULATION

)

4

2"4*

#"

2'",+

2+"4,

!4"'+

2#"*!

!"!

#"#

!"#4

*"2

44'"++

*'

+

#+4"2#

2!"4

42"4*

#"

FG

/N

O

8

T

U 9

W:


44/50

2'",+

2+"4

!4"'+

2#"*!

!"!

page

TION CALCULATION

FG

/N

O

8

T

U9

W:

FG

/ N

O

8

T

U9

W

:


45/50

m de@ection is +"2'+mm

page 4

TION CALCULATION

e% T$'* C"'+%ete F",'-$ti"'

e@ection" 5alculation oB

on

n by ?.>2'''


46/50

Boundation load is 2",# mm

page #

TION CALCULATION

?.>2'''

Boundation load is !",2 mm


47/50

page *

TION CALCULATION

on


48/50


49/50

on load is 2,"+ 3m

page ,

TION CALCULATION

'''A it could be concludedorting water tank

ion is greater than the one by

ht obtained by steel Boundation

dationA hence the weight oB steel

e"

ndation mm


50/50

n is greater than the one by

ht obtained by steel Boundation

dationA hence the weight oB steel

e"

ndation

3m

page

Documents

Water Tank Report