Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WATER-QUALITY AND SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT
CHARACTERISTICS IN KENNEY RESERVOIR,
WHITE RIVER BASIN, NORTHWESTERN COLORADO
By Robert L. Tobin and Caroline P. Hollowed
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4071
Prepared in Cooperation with the
COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Denver, Colorado 1990
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Dallas L. Peck, Director
For additional information write to:
District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Box 25046, Mail Stop 415 Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0046
Copies of this report can be purchased from:
U.S. Geological SurveyBooks and Open-File Reports SectionFederal CenterBox 25425Denver, CO 80225-0425
CONTENTSPage
Abstract--------------- ------- -------- __ _____________ __________ iIntroduction------------------------------------------------------------- 2
Purpose and scope- ---- __-------_-__- -_ ____________________ 4Approach------------------------------------------------------------ 7River-basin characteristics---------- ------------- __-_---__--___ IQHydrology-------- --------- ______________________________________ IQAcknowledgments- ------------ ____________ _________________ _ n
Water-quality characteristics---- ------------------------------- ----- 12Temperature------- ----------------- ------- ____________________ 14Specific conductance------------------------------------------------ 14pH 16Dissolved oxygen and biochemical oxygen demand -------------------- 18Light penetration and turbidity---- ------------------------------- 20General chemical characteristics------------------------------------ 23
Major constituents----- ---- -------- ____________________ 24Nutrients 29Trace constituents------------------------------------------ - 39
Biological characteristics------------------------------------------ 39Phytoplankton 39Bacteria----- ------------------------------------------------ 45
Sediment-transport characteristics-------------- ----------------------- 43Fluvial sediment------------------------------- ------- ---------- 43Sediment retention in the reservoir--------------------------------- 54
Summary and conclusions----------------------------- ---------------- - 50Selected references------------------------------------------------------ 64Hydrologic data---------------------------------------------------------- 67
FIGURES
Page Figure 1. Map showing the White River basin and location
of Kenney Reservoir------------------------------------- 32. Map showing sampling sites for Kenney Reservoir and
the White River 53. Diagram showing major zones in a lake ------------------- 94. Hydrographs showing mean daily discharge at site 3
for water years 1985-87 and at station 09306300 for water years 1973-81--------------------- ___-___-__ n
5. Diagram showing seasonal thermal profiles andcirculation patterns in a temperate zone lake--------- 13
6-26. Graphs showing:6. Water temperature, specific conductance, pH, and
dissolved oxygen at selected depths at site 1 in Kenney Reservoir, water years 1985-87-- ---------- 15
7. Relation of dissolved-solids concentration tospecific conductance in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87 17
8. Water temperature, specific conductance, pH, and dissolved oxygen near the center of Kenney Reservoir, between sites 1 and 2, during a phytoplankton bloom, June 19, 1987------ --- -- 18
iii
Page Figures 6-26. Graphs showing--Continued:
9. Daily values and ranges of biochemical-oxygen demand (BOD) in Kenney Reservoir (site 1) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87 21
10. Secchi-disk measurements, sites 1 and 2 in KenneyReservoir, water years 1985-87- ------------------ 22
11. Relation of turbidity and suspended-solids concentra tions to Secchi-disk measurements in Kenney Reser voir (sites 1 and 2), water years 1985-87 23
12. Relation of suspended-solids concentrations toturbidity in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2),water years 1985-87 24
13. Relations of dissolved-solids concentrations and percent composition of major ions, combined for sites in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), to water discharge measured at site 3, water years 1985-87 28
14. Concentrations of ammonia as nitrogen in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87 34
15. Concentrations of nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87 35
16. Concentrations of organic nitrogen in KenneyReservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River(site 3), water years 1985-87 36
17. Concentrations of phosphorus in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87 37
18. Cell counts and relative composition of theBacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, and Cyanophyta inKenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2), water years1985-87 42
19. Cell counts and relative composition of theChrysophyta, Cryptophyta, Euglenophyta, andPyrrhophyta in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2),water years 1985-87 43
20. Maximum and minimum values of diversity index for all samples of phytoplankton collected in Kenney Reservoir, water years 1985-87------------------- 45
21. Concentrations of fecal coliform and fecalstreptococci bacteria collected at the 2-footdepths in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2),water years 1985-86 47
22. Relations of suspended-sediment loads to water discharge for three hydrologic seasons in the White River (site 3), water years 1983-87 49
23. Relations of annual suspended-sediment loads to annual water discharge for the White River at site 3 (water years 1983-87) and at station 09306300 (water years 1973-81) 53
IV
Page Figures 6-26. Graphs showing--Continued:
24. Percent retention of suspended solids in KenneyReservoir computed from a comparison of data nearthe inlet (site 2) and at the dam (site 1) for arange of water discharge, water years 1985-87------ 55
25. Mean daily suspended-sediment loads and mean daily water discharge in the White River at site 3 and estimated mean daily suspended-solids loads discharged from Kenney Reservoir at site 1, water years 1985-87 56
26. Volume displacement and percent loss of originalreservoir capacity from annual suspended-sediment loads to Kenney Reservoir as estimated from data collections during 1985-87 and methods of Brune (1953) and Churchill (1948) 59
TABLESPage
Table 1. Site information and general data-collection information,Kenney Reservoir and the White River-- -------------------- 6
2. Theoretical hydraulic residence time and capacity-inflowratios for Kenney Reservoir--------------------- ---------- 7
3. Chemical criteria used to classify water types andhardness---------------------------------------------------- 25
4. Concentrations of major constituents in Kenney Reservoir,site 1, water years 1985-87 26
5. Concentrations of major constituents in Kenney Reservoir,site 2, water years 1985-87 26
6. Concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and organiccarbon in Kenney Reservoir, site 1, water years 1985-87----- 30
7. Concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and organiccarbon in Kenney Reservoir, site 2, water years 1985-87----- 32
8. Concentrations of trace constituents in Kenney Reservoir,site 1, water years 1985-87 40
9. Size distributions of bedload and suspended sediment inthe White River at site 3, water years 1984-87 52
10. Examples of computations of volume displacement from sedimentloads to Kenney Reservoir----------------------------------- 58
11. Water-quality data for selected depths in KenneyReservoir, site 1, water years 1985-87---------------------- 68
12. Water-quality data for selected depths in KenneyReservoir, site 2, water years 1985-87---------------------- 74
13. Selected water-quality data for near-surface and near-bottomdepths in Kenney Reservoir, site 1, water years 1985-87----- 77
14. Selected water-quality data for near-surface and near-bottomdepths in Kenney Reservoir, site 2, water years 1985-87----- 78
15. Taxa, numbers, and percent composition of phytoplankton at sites 1 and 2 in Kenney Reservoir, water years 1985-87 79
CONVERSION FACTORS
Multiply
acreacre-foot (acre-ft)acre-foot per year (acre-ft/yr)cubic foot per second (ft3/s)foot (ft)inch (in)mile (mi)square mile (mi2 )tonton per day
By
0.40471233.61233.6
0.028320.304825.41.6092.5890.90740.9074
To obtain
hectare cubic meter cubic meter per year cubic meter per second metermillimeter (mm) kilometer square kilometer metric ton or megagram metric ton or megagram per
day
Temperature in degree Celsius (°C) may be converted to degree Fahrenheit (°F) by using the following equation:
°F=9/5(°C)+32.
The following terms and abbreviations also are used in this report:
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) cells per milliliter (cells/mL)colonies per 100 milliliters (col/100 mL)microgram per liter (pg/L)microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius (pS/cm)milligram per liter (mg/L)milligram per liter per day [(mg/L)/d]millimeter (mm)millimeter of mercury (mm of Hg)nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU)
National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929): A Geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called "Sea Level Datum of 1929."
VI
WATER-QUALITY AND SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT CHARACTERISTICS IN KENNEY RESERVOIR, WHITE RIVER BASIN,
NORTHWESTERN COLORADO
By Robert L. Tobin and Caroline P. Hollowed
ABSTRACT
The construction of Taylor Draw Dam and filling of Kenney Reservoir during 1984 were done in response to increased water-management needs in northwestern Colorado. To evaluate possible processes and changes that may occur in the reservoir after filling and the effects of sediment transport to the reservoir, physical, chemical, and biological data needed to be collected to define seasonal variations in vertical and areal water-quality character istics. Physical, chemical, and biological data collected during the first 3 years of reservoir operation (1985-87) are presented and summarized for two sites in Kenney Reservoir. Related water-quality data and sediment character istics during 1983-87 are summarized for one site on the White River about 8 miles upstream from the reservoir. Data from the three sites were compared for changes in water-quality characteristics that were caused by impoundment. In addition, fluvial sediment loads were determined for the White River upstream from the reservoir for 1983-87, and sediment retention in the reservoir was estimated. During 1983-87, the mean annual discharge in the White River (site 3) was about 174 percent of the mean annual discharge for the period of record (1973-81) at a discontinued streamflow-gaging station near the present dam site.
Changes in water temperature, specific conductance, pH, and dissolved oxygen with depth were measured at the dam (site 1) and near the reservoir inlet (site 2). Some thermal stratification developed during summer when temperatures at site 1 generally decreased 3 to 5 °C from the surface to the bottom. Maximum surface temperatures in the reservoir were 23.8 °C at site 1 and 24.4 °C at site 2. Surface temperatures in the reservoir during summer were similar to temperatures measured in the White River at site 3 during summer.
Specific-conductance values in the reservoir were similar to values in the White River and ranged from 374 to 932 microsiemens per centimeter. Except during a phytoplankton bloom in June 1987, values of pH generally ranged from 7.4 to 8.8, and concentrations of dissolved oxygen generally ranged from 2.3 to 10.1 milligrams per liter. Values of pH that exceeded 9.0 and concentrations of dissolved oxygen that exceeded 200 percent saturation were measured in near-surface waters that contained concentrated growths of phytoplankton in June 1987. Values of pH and dissolved oxygen decreased with depth in summer. Light penetration and turbidity values indicated increasing water clarity from the inflow end of the reservoir to the dam as suspended solids settled in the reservoir.
Water in the reservoir and in the White River was a hard to very hard calcium bicarbonate type during high runoff and a very hard calcium magnesium sulfate bicarbonate type during low flow. A change in ionic composition to a mixed cation sulfate type is predicted during extremely low-flow conditions when specific-conductance values exceed 1,000 microsiemens per centimeter. Concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus were greatest during spring runoff, least in periods of low flow, and were sufficient to support nuisance phyto- plankton growths. Concentrations of ammonia as nitrogen were as much as 0.13 milligram per liter during summer in near-bottom depths at the dam. Concentrations of 22 trace constituents generally were less than maximum recommended concentrations established by the State of Colorado for cold-water biota.
A total of 210 phytoplankton species from 7 phyla were identified in Kenney Reservoir. Phytoplankton were mostly bacillariophyta (diatoms) and chlorophyta (green algae) in 1985-86 and cyanophyta (blue-green algae) in 1987. Cell counts increased from the inflow site to the dam site. Except for an algae bloom in June 1987, a maximum combined cell count (unrounded value) of greater than 15,000 cells per milliliter occurred in a composite sample at the dam in July 1986. In June 1987, a phytoplankton bloom that had cell counts of 71,000 cells per milliliter and that consisted mostly of the dinoflagellate, Peridinium biceps, developed in the reservoir. Similar blooms may occur in the future when concentrations of nutrients are large and when inflow to the reservoir during summer is low. Bacteria concentrations ranged from less than 2 to 1,100 colonies per 100 milliliters. Ratios of fecal coliforms to fecal streptococci generally were less than 1.0.
Suspended-sediment loads at the White River upstream from the reservoir during 1983-87 ranged from 391,000 to 1,570,000 tons per year. Bedload was less than 1.2 percent of the suspended-sediment load. Sediment retention in Kenney Reservoir was estimated to range from about 91 to about 98 percent. Calculations for estimated volume displacement resulting from sediment deposition during 1985-87 ranged from about 1.8 to about 5 percent of the original capacity of the reservoir per year.
INTRODUCTION
During 1984, Kenney Reservoir was constructed in the White River basin in northwestern Colorado (fig. 1). The reservoir, which has a small capacity (13,800 acre-ft), is located on the White River about 8 mi northeast of Rangely. The name of the reservoir originally was proposed to be Taylor Draw Reservoir but later was renamed Kenney Reservoir after the completion of Taylor Draw Dam. The dam is a reinforced earth type and has a spillway capacity of 65,300 ft 3/s at a crest elevation of 5,317.5 ft. A second outlet that has a capacity of 1,700 ft 3/s is provided through an intake orifice near the reservoir bottom at 5,270 ft. When the reservoir is full, the surface area is 615 acres and the maximum depth near the dam is about 50 ft.
The construction of Taylor Draw Dam and filling of Kenney Reservoir were done in response to increased water-management needs in northwestern Colorado. The main purposes of the reservoir were to provide local water supply, recreational use, and potential hydroelectric production. Secondary purposes included flood control and stream water-quality improvement.
LA
NC
O C
O.
Ken
ney
Res
ervo
ir
WH
ITE
J
V.
RIV
ER
U
PLI
FT
40°3
0\
Ul
RIO
x ' '"
"
z s
BLA
NC
aC
Q.
/ x*^
>
1 /
^
* ^ ^
/ } /
/ \
~\»
v _
' -
» >
*- -
- "
.' y '
.y
>
^« i
-j
GA
T^W
EL
DA
TQ
/A J
~
\f
'*-^
. I
*^^v
. . x
f//
f
^ -
0 10
i 1
1 1
1 1
10
10
20
20
30i
i1
I30
40
KIL
OM
ETE
RS
40 M
ILE
S1
Base
from
U.S
. G
eolo
gica
l Sur
vey
Stat
e ba
se m
ap,
1:50
0,00
0,19
68
Figure l.
--Th
e Wh
ite
River
basin
and
loca
tion
of
Ke
nney
Reservoir.
In late 1984, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Water Users Association No. 1 in the Colorado River Water Conservation District, began a reconnaissance of Kenney Reservoir. Because the study began when the reservoir was being filled, an opportunity existed to determine baseline water-quality conditions that can be used for future comparison. The reliability of estimating future water quality of the reservoir based on possible nonsteady-state conditions during the filling period was considered in the study. Although Kenney Reservoir is expected to have a fast flushing (flow-through) rate in late spring when streamflow in the White River is large, the hydraulic residence time will increase because of decreased inflow during late summer and fall and during low-flow years. During these periods of decreased inflow, the reservoir may develop thermal stratification and zones of decreased concentrations of dissolved oxygen. Related chemical and biological characteristics may change with depth and in bottom sediments, which may deleteriously affect reservoir uses. To evaluate these processes and changes and the effects of sediment transport to the reservoir, physical, chemical, and biological data were necessary to define seasonal variations in vertical and areal water-quality characteristics.
The objectives of the study were to: (1) Describe the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics within the reservoir during the first 2 years after filling; (2) compare these water-quality characteristics with characteristics in the White River at a site about 8 mi upstream from the reservoir to determine effects of impoundment; and (3) describe the quantity and characteristics of fluvial-sediment movement in the White River upstream from the reservoir during 1983-87 and estimate the sediment retention of the reservoir during 1985-87. In 1987, the study and data collection were extended 1 additional year to document the water-quality effects in the reservoir from an unexpected phytoplankton bloom that occurred during the early summer of 1987. This extension also provided an opportunity to enhance the sediment data base for the White River with data collected in 1987, a low- runoff year compared with 1983-86.
Purpose and Scope
This report describes the physical, chemical, and biological character istics of the water impounded in Kenney Reservoir and compares these water- quality characteristics to the inflow water from the White River. The report also describes the quantity and characteristics of fluvial-sediment movement in the White River upstream from the reservoir at site 3 during 1983-87 and presents estimates of the sediment retention in the reservoir during 1985-87. Three years of hydrologic data collected during 1985-87 from two sites in Kenney Reservoir are presented, and hydrologic data from one site on the White River about 8 mi upstream from the reservoir during 1985-87 are summarized. Site locations and general data-collection information are shown in figure 2 and are listed in table 1.
108
40'
108°
35'
40°1
0'
40°8
40"6
-
SAM
PLIN
G S
ITE
--
Num
ber
refe
rs t
o ta
ble
1
Bas
e fr
om U
.S.
Geo
logi
cal
Sur
vey
Rio
Bla
nco
Cou
nty,
1:5
0,00
0,19
753
MIL
ES
3 K
ILO
ME
TER
S
CO
NT
OU
R I
NT
ER
VA
L 8
0 FE
ET
NG
VD
OF
19
29
Figure 2.--Sampling si
tes
for
Kenney Reservoir an
d the
White Ri
ver.
Table 1. Site information and general data-col lection information, Kenney Reservoir and the White River
[M, monthly; , data not collected; Q, quarterly; SA, semiannually]
General data-collection information
Group nomenclature
Properties and constituents
Approximate sampling frequency
1Site 2 Site 2 3Site 3
Profile and onsite measurementsTemperatureSpecific conductance (SC)pHDissolved oxygen (DO)Secchi disk
CationsCalcium (Ca) , magnesium (Mg)Potassium (K) , sodium (Na)
AnionsAlkalinity (CaC03 ), chloride (Cl)Fluoride (F) , sulfate (S04 )
NutrientsNitrite plus nitrate (N02+N03 )Ammonia (NHs)Organic nitrogen (Org N)Phosphorus (P)Organic carbon (Org C)
Trace constituentsAluminum (Al), antimony (Sb)Barium (Ba) , beryllium (Be)Cadmium (Cd) , chromium (Cr)Cobalt (Co), copper (Cu)Iron (Fe)Lead (Pb) , lithium (Li)Manganese (Mn) , mercury (Hg)Molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni)Selenium (Se) , silver (Ag)Strontium (Sr) , zinc (Zn)
Biological and physicalPhytoplankton, bacteriaBiochemical oxygen demand (BOD)TurbiditySuspended solidsSuspended sedimentSediment bedload
MMMMM
MMMMM
SASASASASASASASASASA
MMMM--~ ~
MMMMM
MMMMM
SASASASASASASASASASA
MMMM--~
MMMM--
MM
MM
MMMMQ
SASASASAMSASASASASA
--MM--MQ
1Kenney Reservoir at dam near Rangely (U.S. Geological Survey station number 400628108424601).
2Kenney Reservoir near inlet near Rangely (U.S. Geological Survey station number 400851108422701).
3White River below Boise Creek, near Rangely (U.S. Geological Survey station number 09306290).
Approach
Sampling in Kenney Reservoir was designed to measure the vertical and lateral differences in water-quality characteristics that occurred in the reservoir during spring, summer, and fall. Samples collected from site 1 near the dam (fig. 2) were from the deepest (40 to 50 ft) part of the reservoir. Water-quality characteristics at this site represented reservoir water that generally had a maximum residence time for given inflow rates (table 2).
Site 2 near the inlet was established in the north end of the reservoir where the White River enters Kenney Reservoir. Water depth at this site originally was measured at 14 ft in April 1985. Subsequent measurements of depths after the spring runoff in 1985 generally were 10 ft or less. In 1987, measurements of depth at site 2 ranged from 4 to 6 ft. Decreases in depth at this site were attributed to suspended-sediment deposition and redistribution of sediment from the White River. Water-quality characteristics at site 2 represented water that generally had a residence time in the reservoir of less than 24 hours.
Table 2.--Theoretical hydraulic residence time and capacity- inflow ratios for Kenney Reservoir
[ft3/s, cubic feet per second; acre-ft, acre-feet]
Inflow-
outflow discharge (ft 3 /s)
100200300400500
600700800900
1,000
2,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,000
Discharge, log base 10
(ft 3 /s)
2.00002.30102.47712.60212.6990
2.77822.84512.90312.95423.0000
3.30103.47713.60213.69903.77823.8451
Annual discharge (acre-ft)
72,450144,900217,350289,800362,250
434,700507,150579,600652,050724,500
1,449,0002,173,5002,898,0003,622,5004,347,0005,071,500
Approximate residence
time (days) 1
7035231714
129.98.77.77.0
3.52.31.71.41.2.99
Capacity- inflow ratio 2
0.190.095.063.048.038
.032
.027
.024
.021
.019
.010
.006
.005
.004
.003
.003
Approximate residence time, in days, is equal to the reservoir capacity (13,800 acre-ft) divided by the sum of 1.98 times the inflow-outflow discharge.
2 Capacity-inflow ratio is equal to the reservoir capacity (13,800 acre-ft) divided by annual discharge.
In addition to the two reservoir sites, the U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 09306290, White River below Boise Creek, near Rangely was established as site 3. Site 3 is about 8 mi upstream from Kenney Reservoir (fig. 2). All hydrologic data used in this report were obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey WATSTORE (Hutchison, 1975) computer data base.
Profile measurements of water-quality properties and constituents and sample collections for chemical, biological, and physical analyses were made in the reservoir using a submersible pump that continuously delivered water from any depth to a multiprobe manifold at the water surface. The manifold housed probes that measured temperature, specific conductance, pH, and dis solved oxygen. Water samples could be withdrawn at any depth for laboratory analysis. Except at the manifold discharge point, water movement within the entire system remained isolated from atmospheric effects. Oxygen consumption because of indigenous processes that occur within the reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and in the White River (site 3) were estimated from 5- and 20-day natural biochemical-oxygen-demand (BOD) analyses. Incubations for the BOD analyses were processed from iced samples within 12 hours of sample collection.
Light penetration in the reservoir was measured using a standard Secchi disk. The average extinction depth of several observations was used. This value approximates the depth that receives 5 percent of the surface light intensity (Yoshimura, 1938). Major zones in a lake or reservoir based on a combination of light penetration, biology, and morphology are shown in figure 3.
Assessments of general water chemistry are based on laboratory data for periodic samples of major constituents, nutrients, and trace constituents. Samples were taken from near-surface and near-bottom depths at sites 1 and 2 in the reservoir and from depth composites at site 3 in the White River.
Point samples for phytoplankton (algae) identification, biomass, and chlorophyll analyses were collected from depths of maximum dissolved-oxygen saturation (usually 2 ft). Because oxygen is a by-product of photosynthesis, data from these depths generally should represent zones of maximum phyto plankton activity. A second sample that consisted of a composite of water from the euphotic zone (fig. 3) at site 1 and the general water column at site 2 also were analyzed. These analyses were done to describe the general phytoplankton population in the reservoir. The base of the euphotic zone generally is estimated by multiplying the Secchi-disk depth by a factor of 2.5 to 5.0 (Verduin, 1956). However, factors that ranged from 3.0 to 6.0 at site 1 were used where Secchi-disk depths were between 20 and 40 in., and factors that ranged from 2.0 to 4.0 were used where Secchi-disk depths were greater than 40 in. Samples, from water surface to a depth of 10 ft at site 1, were composited when Secchi-disk depths were less than 20 in. All phytoplankton and chlorophyll samples were analyzed by a private laboratory. Concentrations of chlorophylls a, Jb, and c were determined except where large concentrations of suspended material interfered with the analyses.
The presence of sanitary-indicator bacteria, total and fecal coliform, and fecal streptococci also were determined during 1985-86 from near-surface and near-bottom depths at both sites in Kenney Reservoir. Incubations for the bacteria analyses were processed from iced samples within 12 hours of sample collection. All samples for chemical and biological laboratory analyses were
Littoral zone
Limnetic zone
Euphotic zone
Compensation level
Profundal zone
Benthic zone
EXPLANATION
Shallow water area that has sufficient light to support attached vegetation
Open water area where base is defined by the 1-percent light-intensity level
The combined littoral and limnetic zones
Level at which oxygen production equals oxygen uptake
Zone of deep water where the light intensity is less than 1 percent of the surface light. Little or no photosynthesis occurs in this zone
Lake bottom
Figure 3.--Major zones in a lake (modified from Britton and others,1975, p. 3).
collected, preserved, and analyzed in accordance with standard procedures of the U.S. Geological Survey (Brown and others, 1970; Goerlitz and Brown, 1972; Fishman and Friedman, 1985; Britton and Greeson, 1989).
Estimates of annual sediment load transported by the White River are based on streamflow and suspended-sediment and bedload-sediment data for water years 1983-87 collected at site 3 on the White River. Samples of suspended sediment were collected using depth-integrated techniques from equal stream- width increments. Bedload was collected at equal-width increments using a Helley-Smith sampler (Emmett, 1980). Sediment-collection techniques and laboratory analyses used in this study are summarized in Guy (1969) and Guy and Norman (1970).
River-basin Characteristics
The White River basin in northwestern Colorado (fig. 1) includes most of Rio Blanco County and parts of Moffat and Garfield Counties. The drainage area of the White River at Taylor Draw Dam (fig. 2) is 2,773 mi2 . Surface rocks in the basin consist mostly of sedimentary rocks that range in age from Paleozoic in the east to Mesozoic and Cenozoic in the central and western parts of the basin. The headwaters of the White River originate in the high mountains of the White River uplift in eastern Rio Blanco and Garfield Counties. The river flows from an alpine climate westward through transi tional climates near Meeker and into a semiarid climate in western Rio Blanco County. Near Rangely, the White River enters Utah and joins the Green River. Ranching, agriculture, recreation, and energy development are the primary land uses in the basin. A general discussion of the White River basin is presented in Boyle and others (1984).
Hydrology
Precipitation in the basin ranges from 9 in. in western Rio Blanco County to 22 in. in eastern Rio Blanco County. Most precipitation occurs as winter snow and summer thunderstorms. Discharge in the White River occurs princi pally from snowmelt during spring and early summer (fig. 4). Occasional, intense thunderstorms may temporarily increase flow and sediment loads in the White River during summer.
Streamflow extremes for 1910-1987 (U.S. Geological Survey, 1988) indicate that maximum discharges measured at streamflow-gaging stations in the White River occurred during snowmelt runoff in 1983 and 1984 when Taylor Draw Dam was under construction. A maximum discharge for site 3 of 6,440 ft3/s was recorded in June 1984. A minimum daily discharge in the lower White River basin of 62 ft3/s was recorded immediately downstream from the reservoir at the discontinued U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 09306300 in July 1977 (U.S. Geological Survey, 1982). Station 09306300, White River near Rangely, was at the present dam site and was discontinued in 1982 when con struction of the dam began. The mean annual discharge at station 09306300 for the period of record, water years 1973-81, was 633 ft3/s or about 460,000 acre-ft. The mean annual discharge at site 3 for the period of record, water years 1983-87, was 1,099 ft3/s or about 796,000 acre-ft. Mean daily discharge at site 3 for the period of reservoir operation (1985-87) and mean daily
10
^ 10,000
o oLJJ COcc.LJJ Q_K LJJ LJJ LL.O
mDo? 1,000
CD cc <o enQ
100
Site 3, White River below Boise Creek, near Rangely, water years 1985-87
Station 09306300, White River above Rangely, water years 1973-81
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
MONTHMAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT
Figure 4.--Mean daily discharge at site 3 for water years 1985-87 and at station 09306300 for water years 1973-81.
discharge at station 09306300 (1973-81) are shown in figure 4. Using a capacity of 13,800 acre-ft for Kenney Reservoir, the theoretical hydraulic residence times and capacity-inflow ratios for the reservoir at various river discharges are listed in table 2. Residence-time calculations assume complete mixing and no thermal stratification within the reservoir. During periods of thermal stratification, however, temperatures of inflowing water will affect the allocation of the incoming river water within the reservoir. Thus, the residence times within different thermal zones may be considerably different from the values listed in table 2.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Bill Murry and John (Hoot) Gibson of Water Users Association No. 1 in the Colorado River Water Conservation District for their assistance in collecting samples. The authors also thank Jim Geyler of Water Users Association No. 1 for supplying equipment throughout the study period.
11
WATER-QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS
Spatial and temporal changes in water quality often occur in lakes and reservoirs. Although this report is about a reservoir, the term "lake" more commonly is used in general literature and, therefore, sometimes is used in this report where discussing general properties and processes. Many of the explanations for water-quality characteristics presented in this report for Kenney Reservoir represent phenomena known to occur in lakes and reservoirs and are the likely reasons for the observed conditions. However, newly con structed reservoirs characteristically undergo dynamic change in water quality during, and immediately after, the reservoir is filled. A new equilibrium condition in regard to its hydrologic, sediment, nutrient, and other properties usually is not achieved immediately. The filling water inundates the reservoir basin, causing sediments and other materials to enter the water column and undergo chemical and biological reactions and interactions. An enhanced biological productivity often occurs, which can cause tastes and odors, clog intake screens in water-treatment plants, produce slime conditions, and be toxic to animals (Palmer, 1977). Eventually, however, the water body will reach an equilibrium state and exhibit relatively stable water quality. Given the postconstruction sampling period for Kenney Reservoir, therefore, the water-quality and trophic characteristics measured during this study will not necessarily describe the conditions likely to exist over the long term, even considering the relatively rapid flushing rate of the reservoir.
Although many physical and biological variables are involved, changes in water quality occur most noticeably when solar heating during summer causes nonuniform water-temperature distributions to develop within the impounded water. Temperature not only controls the rate of chemical and biological processes, but also, because the density of water is a function of temperature (water is densest at approximately 4 °C), nonuniform temperature (thermal) distribution in water is the primary cause of most stratification in lakes and reservoirs. A less common form of stratification can occur when large concen trations of dissolved solids that increase water density become nonuniformly distributed within a lake. Depending on wind conditions, reservoir morphology, hydraulic residence time, and release patterns at the dam, various forms of thermal stratification may develop. Summer thermal stratification commonly is characterized by (1) an upper zone of uniformly warm water (epilimnion), (2) an intermediate zone of transition where temperature decreases rapidly with depth (metalimnion), and (3) a lower zone of uniformly cold water (hypo- limnion). The thermocline, as defined by Wetzel (1983), is the maximum rate of change of temperature with depth. The seasonal thermal profiles and circu lation patterns of a temperate-zone lake are shown in figure 5. Hutchinson (1957) termed lakes that circulate twice a year in this manner as dimictic. Kenney Reservoir is an example of a dimictic lake.
When thermal stratification is stable, the various metabolic activities of aquatic animals, phytoplankton, plants, and bacteria can alter and recycle dissolved gases, nutrients, and other chemical constituents. As these activ ities progress, the thermocline acts as a barrier between the upper warm- water zone and the lower cold-water zone, decreasing the exchange of heat and dissolved substances and, also, acts as a biological barrier that affects the movement and dispersal of many aquatic organisms. As a result, water zones that have different chemical characteristics may develop. The environments of these physical, biological, and chemical zones are discussed in Hutchinson (1957) and Odum (1971).
12
WIND DIRECTION
EXPLANATION
- - - THERMAL PROFILE 9
DIRECTION OF CIRCULATION
10 20
DEGREES CELSIUS
30
Figure 5.--Seasonal thermal profiles and circulation patterns in a temperate zone lake (modified from Britton and others, 1975, p. 4)
13
Data for onsite measurements of temperature, specific conductance, pH, and dissolved oxygen were collected continuously with depth at sites 1 and 2. Data for these profiles are presented for selected depths in tables 11 and 12 in the "Hydrologic Data" section at the back of the report. In addition, selected water-quality data for near-surface (2 ft) and near-bottom depths at sites 1 and 2 are listed in tables 13 and 14 in the "Hydrologic Data" section.
Temperature
Water temperature from profiles in Kenney Reservoir (tables 11 and 12 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) ranged from 0 °C during winter to 23.8 °C at site 1 during summer, and the maximum water temperature was 24.4 °C at site 2 during summer. Measurements of water temperature for selected depths at site 1 are shown in figure 6. During water years 1985-87, measured water temperatures in the White River at site 3 ranged from 0 to 24.0 °C. Although these data represent instantaneous measurements in time and cannot be compared directly, it seems that the range in temperature of the near-surface water in the reservoir and the White River at site 3 were similar.
During summer, water temperature at site 1 generally decreased 3 to 5 °C with depth (fig. 6). Because water density increases with decreasing water temperature for temperatures above 4 °C, some thermal stratification developed in the reservoir from May through September during the study period. The possible causes for the decreases in temperature with depth were:
1. The disproportionately large absorption of solar radiation by near- surface water when compared with the decreased penetration and absorption of solar radiation by water at depth; and
2. The routing of inflow water within the reservoir to depths or zones that had water temperature similar to the existing temperature of the inflows. Thus, inflow from the White River that enters the reservoir in the early morning, when stream temperatures are cool compared with afternoon tem peratures, may remain and pass through the reservoir at depth.
The temperature differences that develop between near-surface and near- bottom water in the reservoir, the time that stratification stability exists during summer, and the warming of near-surface water may be expected to increase as inflow to the reservoir decreases and as the residence time of the inflowing water increases.
Specific Conductance
Specific conductance is a measure of the ability of water to conduct an electric current and is reported in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius. Specific conductance can be used to estimate the dissolved-solids concentration of similar water types (Hem, 1985, p. 67). Chemical, hydro- logical, and biological activities continuously alter specific conductance through chemical solution or precipitation, dilution and evaporation, and metabolic uptake and release of chemicals.
14
J2
SP
EC
IFIC
CO
ND
UC
TA
NC
E,
g £ <
g IN
MIC
RO
SIE
ME
NS
PE
R
£
«
S
DIS
SO
LV
ED
OX
YG
EN
, IN
D
ISS
OL
VE
D O
XY
GE
N
IN
^G
RB
B^C
BL
^U
S
WA
TE
R T
EM
PE
RA
TU
RE
*£
*
PE
RC
EN
T S
AT
UR
AT
.6N
S
flS
Ss «
R L
TC
R
PH
(U
NIT
S)
DE
GR
EE
S C
ELS
IUS
^ ,N
DE
GR
EE
S C
ELS
IUS
to
ft!
NJA
WC
oS
w^W
^-.W
r-JrJO
DC
OtO
tD
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
t O
O
T 8
yi
OH
(D
y
oooooooo
o
N»
-i*
o>
oo
o
N>
uio
oio
wio
oi
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ow
Q
- to rt
«-
H-
Qu
(D
_T
r
' "
Tl
OO ^
?
en rt
rt
i p*
n>
>C
o w
3
^
^
2
o"
n m
<-
- to
$rt
tn
<-
I"O f
on
** »
n> M
CO
05
0p
w
u^^
N?
-^
J-.
^(t
J> o
o
rt
u.
H,
H?
*-<T>
n
-n
(T> rt
n
2v-
o P
>to
C
u S
rt c
02
n
^
-y-
w
rt
<o
15
<-
H-
to
oo
^3rt
p
CD
^
<_n>
n
t>
(T)»-
* «
OT
S'S
°
"
Z
n>
to
o5
2
£ 3
^Yi
^~-
CD*"^
^
Tl
H-
_50
w
s
fD
w
^w
o
^S
5* -
2<J
">
SS
r
oa
«'"I
O
00
CO
P
0 z
1 1
1 1
1 1
\ 1
-\
\-
\\ \
"\
: r
~~ ' /
*~ ^^
^^
-*""
VN
>
^ .
_ h //
j
<_
- ^
x.
v
^~
:\^^
^
,
i (1
ii
* ^
r. x x
^
^ '
~~
m^m
, _
\
1 1
1
f M
~*i
.^M
-
"^
^^
"~
I
__
_
1
l"
1
1
1
1
1
"
'
/
~~
___
\
1
\
I
- i
I
\l
_ y
__i /
-XA
.
f ^
F
<;^
:~
*^v
^H
^
1-^
- /
:<(
-
' \
* \
: <
J :
_
_ __
~
^~ ^
^ ^^^
: ( f :
» \
~
1 1
1 1
1 ""
1 1
1 1
1:
\- :
\.
i*
r i_
» .~~
/) ~~
/*/~~
S
r
g
*
^
_
_
^
^
_
_
/
//
i*
F v^
""
1^1
~~j
*l
""
^ 1
~
V
_,
^ .
_ -
"~
"
_
__
__
~
~_
_
E If
=i
i i
i i ~
i i
i i
ii
/ / -
/ // -
i' _
s-
C -
\
W
"
V:
> :
__ _ _
__ __
__ _
.s
^^^
_
s _
*..^
_ ^*
^^
^^
\
~_
*
_ __
~~ ~"
_ ^
^ _
"~ ~~
__ _
^ "
_ -»^
_
V t ~"
_
; __
" 1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1.
~\ ~\
\
\
*~_
V
^ _
*^V
v\
v^^> s /
/ ,
v
J j/r
~ ^^^
I
_ «^
I
I
"~
~
"^
\* \
~"
v".\
\ »
\ ~
"
- \/\
-
"^^"
Sx
1
«l
' J
S
s/
"^
X^
""^
_
_
_
__
- I
:'
« *"
i
~ ^
M
O
~ ° °
-n
-
_
S
S
ffl
m
m
H_
H
H
__
N,
*^V
__
_
_
1 1
1 1
1
Except for the first measurements in January 1985, specific conductance from profiles in Kenney Reservoir (tables 11 and 12 in the "Hydrologic Data" section; fig. 6) ranged from 374 to 932 pS/cm. Periodic measurements of specific conductance in the White River at site 3 ranged from 375 to 963 pS/cm during water years 1985-87. The large specific-conductance values (972 and 1,550 pS/cm) measured in January 1985 (table 11 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) near the bottom of the reservoir at site 1 were measured soon after the reservoir filled. These large values were not repeated in subsequent measurements and were attributed to large values of specific conductance from residual ground-water seepage (Van Liew and Gesink, 1985, p. 20-28) and(or) to leaching of dissolved ions from material associated with the dam construction and reservoir-site preparation.
The data in figure 6 indicate little variation in specific conductance with depth. The slight lateral differences in specific conductance within the reservoir (tables 11 and 12 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) are related to changes in inflow discharge and time of travel within the reservoir. Specific conductance was least during snowmelt runoff in May and June and greatest during low flow in fall and winter.
Using the analysis of covariance test, the ratios of specific conductance to concentrations of dissolved solids for all samples in the reservoir were compared with the ratios of specific conductance to concentrations of dis solved solids for the White River at site 3. The test indicated no differences at the 0.05 level of significance for the range of data. The relation of dissolved-solids concentration to specific conductance in the reservoir and in the White River at site 3 is shown in figure 7. Dissolved- solids concentrations can be estimated from specific-conductance measurements in the reservoir and(or) the White River by using the regression shown in figure 7. However, since the reservoir may not be in a steady-state condi tion, additional measurements of specific conductance and dissolved-solids concentrations need to be done to ensure that this relation can be used as a predictive tool.
pH
Hydrogen ion activity (pH) is a measure of the acid-base characteristics of water. Water that is neutral has a pH of 7.0; however, pH of natural water that contains dissolved constituents commonly ranges from 5.0 to 9.0, and more frequently from 6.5 to 8.5 (Hem, 1985, p. 64). The constituents carbon dioxide (C02 ), bicarbonate (HC03), and carbonate (C03), which account for most alkalinity, greatly affect or buffer pH in natural water (Hem, 1985, p. 106).
Diel shifts in pH can develop in water that has considerable biological production and small ionic concentrations (Alien, 1972). Values of pH may increase to greater than 9.0 when phytoplankton use dissolved C02 and HCOs during photosynthesis. Conversely, diel and seasonal decreases in pH to values less than 7.0 can occur when C02 from decomposition and respiration accumulate in poorly mixed water. If exposure time is sufficient, these environmental changes may be harmful or lethal to some aquatic life (National Academy of Sciences, 1972).
16
1,200
i.ooo
800
5 600
400
oOLU
_JO
200
REGRESSION LINE
95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION
DISSOLVED SOLIDS = 0.67 (SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE) -14.3 r 2 =0.98
200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE, IN MICROSIEMENS PER CENTIMETER AT 25 DEGREES CELSIUS
Figure 7.--Relation of dissolved-solids concentration to specific conductance in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87.
Measured values of pH in Kenney Reservoir (tables 11 and 12 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) ranged from 7.4 to 8.8 at site 1 and from 8.2 to 8.6 at site 2. For all depths less than 41 ft at site 1, however, pH ranged from 7.9 to 8.8 (fig. 6). Reservoir data collected from below 40 ft at site 1 represented water from the near-bottom environment. Values of pH in this near-bottom water occasionally were less than 8.0 and decreased several tenths of a pH unit when compared with the overlying water column. These decreases in pH likely were due to the accumulation of C02 and other metabolic waste products that resulted from decomposing organic matter within the benthic zone during periods of thermal stratification and low inflow-outflow discharge. However, because the bottom of newly constructed reservoirs requires time to stabilize, the small pH value of 7.4 measured near the bottom of the reservoir at site 1 in January 1985 probably was not considered representative of reservoir conditions because of construction materials and recent soil dis turbance. During water years 1985-87, measured values of pH at site 3 on the White River ranged from 8.0 to 8.8.
Values of pH at site 1 generally were greatest at or near the reservoir surface. Values of pH changed little with depth at site 2. The pH values at sites 1 and 2 exceeded 8.5 only in water that was supersaturated with respect to dissolved oxygen (tables 11 and 12). The larger pH values (greater than 8.5) were caused by the uptake of C02 and the conversion of HCOs ions to C02 by algae during photosynthesis and related oxygen production. During additional sampling at a selected site near the center of the reservoir on
17
June 19, 1987, a maximum pH of 9.2 was measured at depths of 1 ft or less (fig. 8). The large pH values (greater than 9.0) were associated with dense subsurface growths of phytoplankton that seemed to be confined to depths of less than 1 ft. Values of pH decreased to less than 9.0 below (fig. 8) and laterally (fig. 6, tables 11 and 12) from observed patches of phytoplankton. Except for the biologically active zones near the surface and near the bottom of Kenney Reservoir, ranges of pH values were similar to the range of pH values in the White River (site 3).
Dissolved Oxygen and Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Oxygen dissolves in water to a concentration controlled by the atmos pheric partial pressure of the gas and the temperature and salinity of the water. Concentrations of dissolved oxygen at 100-percent saturation will increase as water temperature decreases and(or) atmospheric pressure increases.
Except for photosynthesis, almost all oxygen transfer to the water occurs at the air-water interface. Because oxygen diffuses very slowly in calm water (Hutchinson, 1957), winds, water turbulence, and currents are major factors in the aeration of a water body.
UJ UJ
LUO
C/5CC Ul
gUl 00
UJQ
15
25
Temperature
- Dissolved oxygen
Dissolved oxygen at100 percent saturation
-10
15
20
I I
7 8 9 10
pH (UNITS)
10
15
20
I 111
I I I
10 15 20 25
400 450 500 550 600
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE,IN MICRO-SIEMENS PER
CENTIMETER AT 25DEGREES CELSIUS
TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES CELSIUS DISSOLVED OXYGEN, IN MILLIGRAMS PER LITER
Figure 8. Water temperature, specific conductance, pH, and dissolved oxygen near the center of Kenney Reservoir, between sites 1 and 2, during a phytoplankton bloom, June 19, 1987.
18
Seasonal and daily variations of dissolved-oxygen concentration in a water body are indirect measures of the biological productivity and oxygen demand of the system. If photosynthetic or respiratory activities are great during thermal stratification, separate biological zones can develop and cause vertical and horizontal variation in chemical characteristics. In lakes, the epilimnion typically is a zone of active biomass (phytoplankton) production, marked by nutrient uptake and daytime oxygen production. Where ample nutri ents and light conditions exist, zones of oxygen supersaturation may develop. Conversely, overlying biomass or debris transported by inflowing streams may become deposited in the hypolimnion. As organisms die and settle downward, they are decomposed by bacteria and fungi. During decomposition, nutrients are returned to the water and oxygen is consumed. If large quantities of organic matter are present and there is little or no mixing with the oxygen ated upper water, the dissolved-oxygen concentrations in the water at deeper levels may decrease to zero (anaerobic condition).
The quantity of oxygen consumed by indigenous processes in an isolated water sample confined in the dark at 20 °C for 5 days is termed the 5-day BOD. BOD is an estimated measurement of the biological- and chemical-oxygen demand required by the processes of respiration, decomposition, and chemical oxida tion that occur in the sample.
Except for the zero value for dissolved oxygen near the bottom of the reservoir in January 1985, measured concentrations of dissolved oxygen at sites 1 and 2 in the reservoir (tables 11 and 12 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) ranged from 2.3 to 10.1 mg/L. Although concentrations of dissolved oxygen tended to decrease with depth at site 1, concentrations equal to or greater than 4.0 mg/L were maintained from the reservoir surface to a depth of 35 ft. The decrease in dissolved oxygen to concentrations less than 4.0 mg/L at depths greater than 35 ft may indicate that depletion of dissolved oxygen from respiration and decomposition processes occurred near the bottom of the reservoir. The concentration of 0.0 mg/L for dissolved oxygen in January 1985 may have resulted from residual ground water that collected near the bottom of the reservoir. Concentrations determined in the White River at site 3 during 1985-87 ranged from 7.8 to 12.5 mg/L.
In June 1987, maximum concentrations of dissolved oxygen within the reservoir were measured during a phytoplankton bloom that drifted at depths generally less than 1 ft. A concentration of 14.7 mg/L dissolved oxygen was measured during additional sampling at the 1-ft depth near the center of the reservoir on June 19, 1987 (fig. 8). Measurements of dissolved oxygen within other localized near-surface patches of phytoplankton on June 9 and June 19, 1987, ranged from 14.0 to 18.0 mg/L. These concentrations represented a range of supersaturation of dissolved oxygen from 190 to 240 percent. In addition to the phytoplankton bloom in June 1987, supersaturation of dissolved oxygen from photosynthetic activities occurred occasionally at both reservoir sites (fig. 6; tables 11 and 12 in the "Hydrologic Data" section). Smaller concen trations and ranges of dissolved oxygen, as compared to the concentrations and ranges of saturation of dissolved oxygen measured within the patches of phyto plankton, were measured at sites 1 and 2 (fig. 6; tables 11 and 12 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) and at depths greater than 5 ft directly below the phytoplankton bloom in June 1987 (fig. 8). These differences indicate that the greatly supersaturated conditions of dissolved oxygen (190-240 percent) were limited to water that contained the concentrated growths of phytoplankton,
19
Values of 5-day BOD in Kenney Reservoir ranged from 0.7 to 2.3 mg/L (tables 13 and 14 in the "Hydrologic Data" section). The daily values and ranges of BOD values determined from 20-day incubations for Kenney Reservoir for two depths at site 1 and for the White River at site 3 are compared in figure 9. Although BOD generally was slightly greater in the White River (site 3) than in Kenney Reservoir (fig. 9), one important exception occurred during the phytoplankton bloom in June 1987. Two selected samples collected near the center of the reservoir on June 9, 1987, from the 1-ft depth within localized growths or patches of phytoplankton had 1-day BOD values that were greater than 5.0 mg/L. These values extrapolated to 5-day BOD estimates that were greater than 25 mg/L. Although not representative of the general water column in the reservoir, these large BOD values indicated that rapid respira tion (oxygen consumption) rates from phytoplankton growths can occur in the reservoir. If the biomass from phytoplankton blooms remain in the reservoir, substantial additional BOD may further decrease dissolved-oxygen concentra tions at depth as microbial decomposition of the sinking biomass occurs.
Light Penetration and Turbidity
Nearly all biological activities in a lake depend directly or indirectly on sunlight. Photosynthesis by phytoplankton and other plants is related to the quantity of available sunlight. The depth to which light penetrates a lake is dependent on latitude and season, lake surface area and morphometry, turbidity, phytoplankton characteristics, and the transmitting and absorbing characteristics of the water and its dissolved material.
Turbidity is a qualitative measure of the light reducing or scattering capabilities of the suspended and colloidal matter in water. Where turbidity becomes large and light penetration is decreased, the following conditions may occur: (1) lowered water temperature at depth, (2) decreased photo synthesis and primary production, and (3) disruption of feeding patterns and physiological functions of benthic organisms and fish. Extreme turbidity levels can be directly lethal to some aquatic organisms (McKee and Wolf, 1963, p. 290-21).
Secchi-disk measurements in Kenney Reservoir (tables 13 and 14 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) ranged from 11 to 144 in. at site 1 and from 2 to 46 in. at site 2. A comparison of Secchi-disk measurements (fig. 10) indicates that substantial increases in light penetration (referred to as transparency in tables 13 and 14) occurred from the inlet (site 2) to the dam (site 1). Light penetration generally was least during periods of snowmelt and storm runoff when concentrations of suspended solids were large and greatest during late summer when streamflow and concentrations of suspended materials in the water column were small.
Turbidity, expressed in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), measured from the 2-ft depths (tables 13 and 14 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) ranged from 1.2 to 45 NTU at site 1 and from 6.0 to 220 NTU at site 2. Turbidity measured in the White River at site 3 ranged from 5.0 to 210 NTU. The pattern of change in turbidity values within the reservoir was similar to the Secchi-disk pattern turbidity decreased and light penetration increased from the inlet to the dam. These relations indicate that light attenuation by phytoplankton in Kenney Reservoir was minimal.
20
SITE 1 (2-foot depth)
DC LU
HiDC LU Q.to
<DC O
Q Z <SLUQZLU O>XO_J<ySLUI O
gCO
SITE 1 (near bottom)
SITES
++
* t
8 12 16
INCUBATION PERIOD, IN DAYS
20 24
Figure 9.--Daily values and ranges of biochemical-oxygen demand (BOD) in Kenney Reservoir (site 1) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87.
21
COUJI02
2
uu 0
15COcc
1o_JUJ 03
ItUJo
u
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
i I I IZT-^.I i i/- i i i i i r^>*L>^!.i I I I i I I I I V-- IY x* / **^"^ \ "
\A / V^" V/ ""V 1 / K"I/
v_
OTTT i ^ ~ Oi 1 C I
- - - SITE 2 ""
_ ^
- -
-
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1J FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAMJJASONDJ FMAMJ JASON
MONTHS
1985 1986 1987
Figure 10.--Secchi-disk measurements, sites 1 and 2 in Kenney Reservoir, water years 1985-87.
The relation of turbidity and suspended-solids concentrations to Secchi- disk measurements and the relation of suspended-solids concentrations to turbidity (tables 13 and 14 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) were nonlinear. After log transformations of turbidity, suspended-solids concentrations, and Secchi-disk measurements, the relations of turbidity and suspended solids to Secchi-disk measurements were inverse and linear and are shown in figure 11. A positive and linear relation of suspended-solids concentrations to turbidity is shown in figure 12. The large values for the coefficients of determination (r 2 ) (figs. 11 and 12) were obtained because light penetration is closely associated with turbidity and because fine silts and clays that accounted for most of the suspended material in the reservoir were uniformly distributed.
22
y cc
LU Z (/3ID< Q. . m
£~P o9 e mDCD -1
I
REGRESSION LINE
95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION
Turbidity= -1.29 (Secchi disk) +2.88 r 2 =0.98
Suspended solids= -1.53 (Secchi disk)+3.27 r 2 =0.86
SECCHI DISK, IN INCHES (LOG BASE 10)
Figure 11.--Relation of turbidity and suspended-solids concentrations to Secchi-disk measurements in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2), water years 1985-87.
General Chemical Characteristics
The general chemical constituents in natural water are derived mainly from the action of water on soils and rocks (Hem, 1985). Carbon dioxide, derived from the atmosphere or from biological processes, readily dissolves in water, which decreases pH and increases acidity. Chemical constituents in soils and rocks are selectively dissolved into the water in various states of oxidation and ionization. The chemical constituents commonly are grouped as major constituents or ions, nutrients, and trace constituents.
23
OC LU
Q_ CO
Z CQ« §
oCO Q
LU Q_ CO D CO
REGRESSION LINE
95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION
SUSPENDED SOLIDS = 1.16 (TURBIDITY) -0.11 r 2 =0.86
1 2
TURBIDITY, IN NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS (LOG BASE 10)
Figure 12.--Relation of suspended-solids concentrations to turbidity in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2), water years 1985-87.
Major Constituents
The most common major ions are listed below.
Cations (positive charge)
Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg) Potassium (K) Sodium (Na)
Anions (negative charge)
Alkalinity (CaC03 ) Bicarbonate (HC03 ) Carbonate (C03 )
Chloride (Cl)Fluoride (F)Sulfate (S04 )
Data for these ions provide a basis for the determination of hardness and the geochemical classifications used in this report (table 3).
24
Table 3. Chemical criteria used to classify water types and hardness
[Water types, modified from Piper and others, 1953, p. 26; hardness, modified from Durfor and Becker, 1964, p. 27]
Water types (milliequivalents per liter)
Hardness
Cations Anions
Bivalent cations; Classifi- calcium and magne- cation sium (milligrams
per liter as CaC03 )
Single cation used when it amounts to 50 percent or more of the total cation equivalents; when the above does not exist, the largest percentages of two cations are used.
Single anion used when it amounts to 50 percent or more of the total anion equivalents; when the above does not exist, the largest percentages of two anions are used.
Soft Moderately
hard---- Hard Very hard-
Less than 60.
61-120.
121-180.More than 180.
The general water quality in the White River at site 3 and in Kenney Reservoir (tables 4 and 5) was determined from milliequivalent conversions of concentrations of cations and anions. The water types changed from a hard to very hard calcium bicarbonate type during high-flow conditions (greater than 3,500 ft3/s) to a very hard calcium magnesium sulfate bicarbonate type during low-flow or base-flow conditions (less than 400 ft3/s). Although not shown, regressions were developed that related concentrations of the major constitu ents to specific conductance for the White River and Kenney Reservoir. Tests for similarity of data at the 0.05 level of significance indicated that the water chemistry for the major constituents was statistically similar at all sites. The relations of the dissolved-solids concentrations and percent composition of major ions to water discharge are shown in figure 13.
25
Table 4.--Concentrations of major constituents
[ft, feet; °C, degrees Celsius; pS/cm, microsiemens per
Date
01/16/8501/16/85
06/04/8506/04/85
09/06/8509/06/85
10/21/8510/21/85
04/24/8604/24/86
06/03/8606/03/86
08/20/8608/20/86
06/19/8706/19/87
09/03/8709/03/87
Time
14301535
12501340
11051155
12351315
12251310
11451230
12251310
13251415
12151305
Sample depth (ft)
247
245
243
240
240
240
240
245
245
Temper ature(°c)
0.05.0
15.810.9
19.117.9
8.58.0
12.09.0
14.712.3
22.019.0
19.614.0
19.516.8
Specific conduct
ance (MS/cm)
7411,550
453430
835932
820828
865870
374403
739756
511531
824825
pH (units)
8.37.4
8.38.3
8.38.1
8.48.4
8.58.4
8.28.2
8.58.2
8.87.8
8.48.1
Calcium, dis
solved (mg/L Ca)
72120
4648
6868
7070
7372
4243
6266
5153
6771
Magne sium, dis solved (mg/L Mg)
2989
1818
3537
3334
3737
1516
3032
2021
3535
Potas sium, dis solved (mg/L K)
1.62.3
1.31.3
2.33.1
2.01.7
1.91.8
1.21.2
1.81.8
1.41.3
1.91.9
Sodium dis solved (mg/L Na)
4882
2122
6264
5758
5658
1618
5052
2828
6360
Alka linity, labora tory (mg/L CaC03 )
187282
129143
198193
195194
212212
123127
183197
150152
192209
Table 5. Concentrations of major constituents
Date
06/04/85
09/06/85
10/21/8510/21/85
04/24/86
06/03/86
08/20/86
06/19/87
09/03/87
Time
1435
1105
14051420
1335
1310
1405
1155
1105
Sample depth (ft)
2
2
210
2
2
2
2
2
Temper ature (°C)
14.4
19.1
8.58.1
11.8
17.0
22.2
17.8
19.0
(ft,
Specific conduct
ance (MS/cm)
456
907
794796
718
389
736
582
814
feet;
PH (units)
8.3
8.5
8.58.4
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.6
8.4
°C, degrees
Calcium, dis solved (mg/L Ca)
47
73
6870
64
43
63
58
66
Celsius
Magne sium, dis solved (mg/L Mg)
18
38
3232
32
15
29
23
36
; MS/cm,
Potas sium, dis solved (mg/L K)
1.4
2.6
1.71.6
1.7
1.2
1.7
1.4
1.7
microsiemens per
Sodium dis solved (mg/L Na)
22
70
5253
45
17
49
34
60
Alka linity, labora tory (mg/L CaC03 )
134
213
192190
186
125
193
166
195
26
in Kenney Reservoir, site 1, water years 2985-87
centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; mg/L, milligrams per liter]
Chloride, dis solved (mg/L CD
12.027.0
5.25.6
15.018.0
15.015.0
13.013.0
4.24.7
12.012.0
10.010.0
16.014.0
in Kenney
centimeter
Chloride, dis solved (mg/L CD
5.6
17.0
14.014.0
9.9
4.3
12.0
11.0
15.0
Fluoride, dis solved (mg/L F)
0.2.3
.1
.1
.3
.3
.3' .3
.3
.3
.1
.1
.3
.3
.2
.2
.3
.3
Reservoir/
Sulfate, Silica, dis- dis
solved solved (mg/L (mg/L S04 ) Si02 )
190510
9294
220270
230230
240250
7585
170180
110110
220220
1520
1212
1311
1013
1313
1212
1415
1313
1214
site 2, water years
at 25 degrees Celsius
Fluoride, dis solved (mg/L F)
0.2
.3
.3
.3
.2
.1
.2
.2
.3
Sulfate, dis solved (mg/L S04 )
94
240
210210
200
81
170
120
220
; mg/L,
Silica, dis
solved (mg/L Si02 )
12
14
1112
14
12
14
13
11
Solids, sum of constit uents
dissolved (mg/L)
4801,020
273287
534587
534538
560570
240260
450480
320330
530540
2985-87
milligrams
Solids, sum of constit uents
dissolved (mg/L)
281
583
504507
480
250
460
360
530
Hard- Hard- ness, ness noncar- (mg/L bonate CaC03 ) (mg/L
CaC03 )
299666
189194
314322
311315
335332
167173
278297
210219
310320
per liter]
Hard ness (mg/L CaC03 )
192
339
302307
292
169
277
240
310
112384
6051
116129
116121
123120
4446
95100
6067
119112
Hard ness ,
noncar- bonate (mg/L CaC03 )
58
126
110117
106
44
84
74
118
Sodium adsorp tion ra,tio (SAR)
1.01.0
.7
.7
1.51.6
1.41.4
1.01.0
.5
.6
1.01.0
.8
.8
2.01.0
Sodium adsorp tion ratio (SAR)
0.8
1.8
1.31.4
1.0
.6
1.0
1.0
1.0
Percent sodium
2621
1920
3030
2828
2727
1718
2828
2322
3129
Percent sodium
20
31
2727
25
18
28
24
30
27
8^ 600zi. w OCL.
</)=!
200
+
Q UJ
CO(/) CCZ UJgt
gSJ
u.Z
§5
IUU
80
60
40
20
0
100
I'll CATIONS
D ftew.n _n D D [ft D D
^**^D^J D D CALCIUM PLUS MAGNESIUM + SODIUM
_ i$HkX+ * ++ + ^ + +i i i iI I I I A MI/-MUO
o o
UJoCC UJ Q.
uu
80
60
40
20
n
1 1 1 1 ANIONS D ALKALINITY AS CaCO 3
+ SULFATE
!$$&&ocH a
+ + -P i * ° ° !?** § a *1 D =4- ^ ^ + +
-
1 1 1 11,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
WATER DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
5,000
Figure 13.--Relations of dissolved-solids concentrations and percent composition of major ions, combined for sites in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), to water discharge measured at site 3, water years 1985-87.
28
Nutrients
The biological productivity in lakes is dependent on the availability of nutrients within the aquatic system. Those elements that are needed in large quantities for plant growth, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon, are termed major nutrients or macronutrients. Those elements needed in minute quantities, such as molybdenum and zinc, are termed as trace nutrients or micronutrients.
Although there are several ways for nutrients to enter a lake, most nutrients originate from surface-water inflow and cultural input such as septic-tank discharge. Once in the lake, nutrients are subjected to various removal and(or) recycling functions. Large quantities of nutrients can be removed from the water by chemical reactions, adsorption onto sediment and subsequent deposition, and biological utilization. These processes may be reversed, however, through biochemical action. The conversion of inorganic nutrients into biomass (nutrient removal) within a zone of substantial phyto- plankton productivity may be reversed in the profundal zone where nutrients are recycled back into solution as byproducts from decomposition. These processes often produce uneven chemical and nutrient distributions when the lake is stratified.
Attempts to classify lakes into trophic categories commonly are based on the concentrations of macronutrients. Nitrogen and especially phosphorus currently are considered the major nutrients that affect the rate of eutro- phication in lakes and reservoirs. Sawyer (1947) states that nuisance phytoplankton conditions can occur when inorganic nitrogen concentrations exceed 0.3 mg/L and phosphorus concentrations exceed 0.01 mg/L.
Vollenweider (1968) compared the input of nitrogen and phosphorus to lake mean depth and determined that shallower lakes are more sensitive to nuisance growth conditions than deeper lakes. A short hydraulic residence time (small capacity-inflow ratio), however, may control phytoplankton production by maintaining rapid flushing rates (Welch, 1969). Various attempts to control the rate and undesirable effects of eutrophication are summarized by Dunst and others (1974).
Nutrient data for Kenney Reservoir are listed in tables 6 and 7; nutrient data for the White River (site 3) for water years 1985-87 were compiled from the U.S. Geological Survey WATSTORE (Hutchison, 1975) computer data base. Concentrations of ammonia, nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen, and organic nitrogen that were determined for sites 1, 2, and 3 during 1985-87 are shown in figures 14, 15, and 16. The concentrations of phosphorus are shown in figure 17. Concentrations of total organic carbon in the White River (site 3) and near the inlet (site 2) generally ranged from about 2 to 12 mg/L. Concen trations of total organic carbon at site 1 ranged from about 2 to 6 mg/L and generally were less than at sites 2 and 3. Concentrations of total organic carbon at site 3 were greatest during spring runoff; variations in concentra tions of dissolved organic carbon generally were independent of flow.
29
Table 6. Concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and
[ft, feet; mg/L, milligrams per
Date
01/16/8501/16/85
04/24/8504/24/85
06/04/8506/04/85
06/27/8506/27/85
07/19/8507/19/85
08/07/8508/07/85
08/28/8508/28/85
09/06/8509/06/85
09/17/8509/17/85
10/21/8510/21/85
04/24/8604/24/86
06/03/8606/03/86
06/24/8606/24/86
07/22/8607/22/86
08/20/8608/20/86
09/16/8609/16/86
06/09/87
06/19/8706/19/87
07/15/8707/15/87
08/13/8708/13/87
09/03/8709/03/87
Time
14301535
10201110
12501340
13151405
12351325
12351325
12151305
11051155
11351225
'12351315
12251310
11451230
11201205
10551140
12251310
11401225
1300
13251415
15001545
14351520
12151305
Sample depth (ft)
247
245
245
243
245
245
242
243
242
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
2
245
240
240
245
Nitrogen nitrite, dissolved (mg/L N)
<0.01< .01
< .01.01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01.01--
.01
.01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01.02
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01.02
< .01< .01
Nitrogen N02+N03 , dissolved (mg/L N)
0.52< .10
.86
.86
.52
.51
.26
.31
< .10.15
.20
.27
.28
.29
--
.32
.35
.38
.39
1.001.00
.28
.32
.15
.18
.28
.21
.19
.25
.24
.21--
< .10< .10
< .10< .10
.18
.16
< .10.12
Nitrogen N02+N03 , total
(mg/L N)
0.5< .1
.8
.9
.5
.5
.2
.3
< .1.1
.2
.3
.3
.3
.3
.4
.3
.4
.4
.4
1.01.0
.3
.3
.2
.2
< .1.2
.2
.3
.22.0
< .1
< .1< .1
< .1< .1
.2
.2
.1
.1
Nitrogen ammonia,
dissolved (mg/L N)
0.042.50
.06
.07
.05
.05
.03
.05
.02
.07
.03
.12
.03
.11
----
.06
.07
.06
.06
.04
.06
< .01.02
< .01.02
.03
.07
.05
.09
.06
.06
--
< .01.01
.02
.06
.03
.09
.02
.09
Nitrogen ammonia , total
(mg/L N)
0.052.60
.06
.07
.05
.03
.05
.06
.03
.09
.04
.11
.04
.12
.05
.13
.04
.05
.06
.06
.04
.04
< .01.02
.02
.02
.03
.06
.04
.10
.05
.05
.11
.02
.04
.02
.07
.03
.10
.01
.08
Nitrogen organic, dissolved (mg/L N)
0.16.00
.44
.73
.25
.25
.27
.25
.18
.33
.37
.38
.27
.29
--
.34
.33
.24
.24
.26
.24
.28
.18
.17
.23
--
--
--
.19
.19----
.87
.71
< .18< .12
30
organic carJbon in Kenney Reservoir, site 1, water years 1985-87
liter; <, less than; --, no data]
Nitrogen organic, total (mg/L N)
0.15.20
.64
.73
.25
.17
.05
.24
.37
.31
.16
.29
.26
.58
.45
.47
.46
.35
.34
.34
.36
.46
.39
.38
.28
.28
.27
.24
.26
.30
.35
.55
4.30
.182.60
.58
.63
.67
.50
.39
.42
Nitrogen, dissolved (mg/L N)
0.722.50
1.361.66
.82
.81
.56
.61
.20
.55
.60
.77
.58
.69
--
.72
.75
.68
.69
1.301.30--.62
.38
.48
.51
--
--
--
.20
.20
--
1.08.96
< .30< .32
Nitrogen, total (mg/L N)
0.702.80
1.501.70
.82
.70
.30
.60
.40
.50
.40
.70
.601.00
.801.00
.80
.80
.80
.80
1.401.50
.70
.70
.50
.50
--.50
.50
.70
.602.60
4.40
.202.60
.60
.70
.90
.80
.50
.60
Phosphorus ortho,
dissolved (mg/L P)
<0.01.01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
< .01< .01
.02
.01
.03
.02
--
< .01< .01
.01--
< .01.01
.01
.02
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01.01
< .01< .01
--
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
.02
.01
Phosphorus ortho, total (mg/L P)
<0.01.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.04
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
< .01< .01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.03
< .01.02
< .01.02
< .01< .01
.05
--
--
< .01< .01
< .01--
Phos phorus, dissolved (mg/L P)
<0.01.15
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.02
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
--
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
.01
.02
.02
.04
.02
.03
< .01.03
< .01.01
.01< .01
--
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
< .01.01
Phos phorus, total (mg/L P)
0.01.28
.04
.05
.02
.02
.05
.01
.01
.02
.03
.03
< .01< .01
.01
.05
.01
.02
< .01< .01
.02
.02
.04
.04
.04
.04
.02
.03
.02
.03
.03
.04
.30
.05
.07
.02
.02
.02
.03
.02
.03
Carbon organic, dissolved (mg/L C)
1.85.0
5.85.1
3.23.4
2.83.4
4.23.0
3.23.4
3.13.2
--
4.54.2
3.33.2
4.34.3
4.34.9
3.43.4
3.43.3
3.43.4
3.13.1--
4.74.8
4.23.8
4.14.3
3.33.8
Carbon organic, total (mg/L C)
2.16.2
4.86.0
4.34.7
3.53.6
3.93.6
3.33.6
3.13.4
3.03.8
3.63.6
3.56.7
4.64.7
4.45.1
3.73.6
3.33.6
4.34.7
3.23.4--
3.63.3
4.23.3
4.14.2
4.04.2
31
Table 7. Concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and
[ft, feet; mg/L, milligrams per
Date
04/24/85 04/24/85
06/04/85 06/04/85
06/27/85 06/27/85
07/19/85 07/19/85
08/07/85 08/07/85
08/28/85 08/28/85
09/06/85
09/17/85 09/17/85
10/21/85 10/21/85
04/24/86 04/24/86
06/03/86 06/03/86
06/24/86 06/24/86
07/22/86 07/22/86
08/20/86
09/16/86 09/16/86
06/09/87
06/19/87
07/15/87
08/13/87
09/03/87
Time
1200 1225
1435 1450
1445 1505
1400 1415
1355 1405
1435 1450
1220
1300 1310
1405 1420
1335 '1345
1310 1320
1245 1300
1220 1235
1405
1305 1315
1210
1155
1330
1320
1105
Sample depth (ft)
2 14
2 8
2 13
2 9
27
2 9
2
27
2 10
27
27
2 10
2 10
2
27
2
2
2
2
2
Nitrogen nitrite,
dissolved (mg/L N)
<0.01 < .01
< .01 < .01
< .01 < .01
< .01 < .01
< .01 < .01
< .01 < .01
--
< .01 < .01
< .01 < .01
.01
.02
< .01 < .01
< .01 < .01
< .01 < .01
< .01
< .01 < .01
--
< .01
< .01
< .01
< .01
Nitrogen N02+N03 , dissolved (mg/L N)
1.00 1.00
.51
.50
.34
.34
.10
.13
.25
.28
.34
.35
--
.21
.24
.32
.31
.83
.88
.33
.31
.19
.20
.18
.31
.27
.19
.18
--
< .10
.10
.12
.10
Nitrogen N02+N03 , total
(mg/L N)
1.0 1.0
.5
.5
.3
.3
.1
.1
.3
.3
.3
.4
.4
.2
.2
.3
.3
.9
.9
.3
.3
.2
.2
.2
.2
.3
.2
.2
< .1
< .1
.1
.1
.1
Nitrogen ammonia ,
dissolved (mg/L N)
0.06 .05
.04
.04
.03
.04
.02
.02
.04
.04
.03
.04
--
.05
.05
.05
.05
.06
.07
< .01 < .01
.02
.03
.03
.04
.07
.03
.04
--
< .01
.04
.03
.02
Nitrogen ammonia , total
(mg/L N)
0.05 .05
.03
.05
.05
.06
.04
.05
.04
.04
.02
.05
.05
.06
.06
.08
.04
.05
.08
< .01 .01
.03
.01
.02
.02
.06
< .01 .03
.02
.02
.04
.02
.03
Nitrogen organic,
dissolved (mg/L N)
0.44 .55
.26
.26
.37
.36
.28
.38
.46
.36
.37
.26
--
.35
.35
.35
.25
.34
.33
--
.28
.27
.16
--
--
--
.48
.46
.27
< .18
32
organic carJbon in Keraiey Reservoir, site 2, water years 1985-87
liter; <, less than; , no data]
Nitrogen organic, total (mg/L N)
0.721.55
.17
.25
.25
.34
.36
.25
.26
.36
.48
.55
.45
.44
.44
.32
.36
1.401.70
.49
.49
.37
.29
.28
.38
.34
.39
.37
.88
1.30
1.20
.28
.37
Nitrogen, dissolved (mg/L N)
1.501.60
.81
.80
.74
.74
.40
.53
.75
.68
.74
.65--
.61
.64
.72
.61
1.231.28
--
.49
.50--.51--
--
--
.50
.50
.42
< .30
Nitrogen, total (mg/L N)
1.772.60
.70
.80
.60
.70
.50
.40
.60
.70
.801.00
.90
.70
.70
.70
.70
2.352.68
.80
.80
.60
.50
.50
.60
.70
.60
.60
.90
1.30
1.20
.32
.50
Phosphorus ortho,
dissolved (mg/L P)
0.02.02
.01< .01
.03
.03
< .01< .01
.02
.03
< .01.04--
< .01.01
< .01.01
.01
.01
.02
.02
.02
.02
< .01< .01
< .01
< .01< .01
--
< .01
.01
< .01
.01
Phosphorus ortho, total (mg/L P)
0.02.02
.01
.02
.04
.04
< .01< .01
< .01< .01
< .01.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.03
< .01.01
.01
< .01< .01
.02--
--
< .01--
Phos phorus , dissolved (mg/L P)
0.01.02
.02
.03
.03
.05
< .01< .01
.01
.01
< .01< .01
.03
< .01.01
< .01< .01
.02
.02
.03
.03
.02
.04
.01
.01
.01
< .01< .01
.10
.02
.02
.01
.01
Phos phorus , total (mg/L P)
0.06.04
.03
.03
.12
.10
.02
.10
.03
.03
< .01< .01
--
.04
.04
.03
.04
.04
.08
.05
.06
.10
.04
.03
.05
.04
.04
.04
--
.08
.04
.02
.02
Carbon organic, dissolved (mg/L C)
4.84.5
3.23.5
3.63.7
4.58.0
4.04.0
3.53.5--
6.94.8
3.23.1
4.64.8
4.34.3
4.53.7
3.63.2
3.8
1.73.5
--
5.0
4.1
4.0
3.8
Carbon organic, total (mg/L C)
6.612.0
4.86.9
6.34.4
4.38.2
2.82.8
3.93.5
3.7
3.84.5
3.02.1--13.0
4.55.5
4.44.1
3.44.2
5.8
3.23.2
--
3.3
4.4
4.1
4.3
33
0.16
0.12
0.08
0.04
0
SITE 1 (2-foot depth)
DISSOLVED
A TOTAL
A AAA A
A «
III I I I I I I I t*l I I I M MA*
M I I* I
CD OjEo.16
Z
<rLJJ t 0.08
<r£j 0.04
<!E n
SITE 1 (near bottom)I I I II I I I I II I I I I I I I M I I I I I I I I II I I I I
A A
~- A» A A
A « A
A A A
A A _ A A _
A
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I M I I I I I I I I I I ! ! I I I
SITE 2 (all depths)Z
zLUUOCC.
Z05^^ZO
U. ID
0.12
0.08
0.04
0
I I I I I I I I I I I M I
_
A
A A AAA AA**
**A * AA*
AM I M I I I I I I II I
I I I I I I M M I I II I I I I
A
AA
A AA A
I I I »*l I 4 M I I I M I l»l I
I I
_
A 1 1
0.16
0.12
0.08
0.04
SITE 3
A
A A
A
I I I I Mill || I I t t I I 1 I 1 4 I + I I I M *l I «MJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASON
MONTHS
1985 1986 1987
Figure 14. Concentrations of ammonia as nitrogen in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87.
34
O tr
ocLU
IjQC LU Q_
1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
0
2.00
1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
0
SITE 1 (2-foot depth)
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i r i i i i i r i DISSOLVED
A TOTAL
'**MM i *i i
SITE 1 (near bottom)
i i nil i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i "i i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i iA
*r i P
O OC
1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
SITE 2 (all depths)
I I I I I 1 IT IT II I I I Tl II IT TT \\\ I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I M I I I I I I I I I I
I w 0
*t I t I I I I I I I I t*t < t IZ> _i Q_LU
g 1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
SITE 3
I I I I I I * I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I i I I M I 1JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASON
MONTHS
1985 1986 1987
Figure 15.--Concentrations of nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87.
35
SITE 1 (2-foot depth)
1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
0
DISSOLVED
A TOTAL
A A A AA A
A _ AAA »A
*% A* « ~f " i i i i i i A" f i i i i i i i i i i T i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
SITE 1 (near bottom)
CC ill Q_(/>
<CC O
1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
0 L I I I I* *
T I I
« A«£ * AI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
*111
SITE 2 (all depths)111 (DO ccr~
ZOztnCCO
1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
n
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
_ A _A
A
AA
_ A __
A
t| j|Aij . AAA A A ** 4 A ~
Mil Mill Illllllllflllllllllllllll
SITES
1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
II T I I I I I I I
A
_
*
i i i i i <* p i i *i r i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i iJFMAMJJASONDJ FMAMJJASONDJ FMAMJJASON
MONTHS
1985 1986 1987
Figure 16. Concentrations of organic nitrogen in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87.
36
0.50
0.40
0.20
SITE 1 (2-foot depth)
II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
DISSOLVED
A TOTAL
4 I I $ I fl«4 *«1«4 I I I I I 4 I $04 4 I I I I I I I I I ! + «
0.50
0.40
0.20
CC LLJ Q_
cn
SITE 1 (near bottom)
I MM Mtt ft«f Al» I II I I ! E I I I I I I I I I *P
-j 0.50
0.40
Dg 0.20X Q_
O X
SITE 2 (all depths)
M I I M I I I I I I I I I I I I I M I I I I I I I I I I I I I
A WA
i i i i i fr i fai i i i i i i i i i i ! $
0.70
0.60
0.40
0.20
SITE 3
IIIIIIIIIITMlTMTilT III I T I I I I I I I I
A A
»i »ryttiA4«iJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASON
MONTHS
1985 1986 1987
Figure 17.--Concentrations of phosphorus in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) and the White River (site 3), water years 1985-87.
37
Except for ammonia, concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus tended to be greatest during spring runoff and least during late summer and fall. At sites 1 and 2, inorganic forms of dissolved and total nitrogen (ammonia and nitrite plus nitrate) and total phosphorus often exceeded the concentration levels of 0.3 mg/L as nitrogen and 0.01 mg/L as phosphorus that are considered sufficient to produce nuisance phytoplankton growths. Dissolved phosphorus concentrations frequently were less than 0.1 mg/L in the White River (site 3) and less than 0.05 mg/L in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2). Large concen trations of dissolved or total phosphorus (0.2 to 0.62 mg/L) occasionally occurred in the White River during spring runoff.
Concentrations of total and(or) dissolved ammonia generally were greatest in the White River at site 3 (0.01 to 0.12 mg/L) and near the reservoir bottom at site 1 (concentrations commonly ranged from 0.01 to 0.13 mg/L). Except for one sample in June 1987, ammonia concentrations were least (<0.01 to 0.06 mg/L) in samples from the 2-ft depth at site 1. Concentrations of ammonia generally increased several hundredths of a milligram per liter during summer from the 2-ft depth to near-bottom water at site 1. These increases in ammonia concen trations probably were from accumulations of ammonia that were produced from biochemical processes. The concentration of total ammonia of 0.11 mg/L at the 2-ft depth at site 1 on June 9, 1987, probably was a result of increased organic decomposition. The very large concentrations of ammonia (2.5 and 2.6 mg/L) analyzed from samples collected at the 47-ft depth at the dam (site 1) in January 1985 may have resulted from the biological decay of residual organic material on the reservoir bottom shortly after filling and from organic decomposition and subsequent release from sediments during anaerobic conditions in January.
Except for an unexplained concentration of 2.0 mg/L in the bottom sample at site 1 in September 1986, concentrations of dissolved and(or) total nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen ranged from less than 0.1 to 1.0 mg/L at all sites. Concentrations generally were greatest at all sites during spring runoff and least at sites 1 and 2 during summer and fall. Concentrations of dissolved and(or) total organic nitrogen in the White River (site 3) and reservoir inlet (site 2) ranged from 0.15 to 1.7 mg/L. Except for samples in June 1987, con centrations of dissolved and(or) total organic nitrogen in the reservoir at site 1 (0.00 to 0.87 mg/L) were substantially less than concentrations deter mined in the White River. The decreases of organic nitrogen from site 3 to site 1 may indicate that substantial quantities of total organic nitrogen transported by the White River were removed from the water column as a result of sedimentation processes near the inflow to the reservoir. The large con centrations of total organic nitrogen (4.3 mg/L), total ammonia (0.11 mg/L), and total phosphorus (0.3 mg/L) that were determined at site 1 on June 9, 1987, were from samples that contained large concentrations of phytoplankton.
During spring and early summer 1987, substantial quantities of nitrogen and possibly phosphorus may have entered Kenney reservoir, apparently from sources upstream from site 3 on the White River (figs. 16 and 17). Concen trations of total nitrogen (ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, and organic nitrogen) exceeded 1.5 mg/L, and concentrations of total and(or) dissolved phosphorus were 0.4, 0.3 mg/L, and 0.62 mg/L in samples collected at site 3. The large concentrations of these nutrients that entered the reservoir probably con tributed to the phytoplankton bloom that occurred within the reservoir in June 1987.
38
Trace Constituents
A selected group of 22 trace constituents (table 8) were analyzed from samples collected from the 2-ft and near-bottom depths in Kenney Reservoir at the dam (site 1). The samples were collected during high- and low-flow conditions, and under ice, to determine if concentrations in excess of State- recommended criteria (Colorado Department of Health, 1978) of toxic or undesirable substances were present in the reservoir during 1985-87. Except for the one-time occurrence of concentrations of total recoverable iron and manganese in excess of 1,000 pg/L near the reservoir bottom in January 1985 and the concentrations of total recoverable mercury (as much as 0.2 pg/L), all concentrations of trace constituents were less than the recommended concentrations established by the State of Colorado for cold-water biota.
Concentrations of trace constituents analyzed during 1985-87 from five samples from the White River at site 3 generally were similar to those measured in the reservoir. Concentrations of total recoverable copper, mercury, and zinc tended to be slightly greater in the White River than concentrations determined in Kenney Reservoir.
Biological Characteristics
Biota in lakes and reservoirs are complex and include bacteria, plants (particularly phytoplankton), zooplankton, insects and other invertebrates, and vertebrates such as fish and waterfowl (Hutchinson, 1967; Odum, 1971). The organism distributions and densities vary greatly with season, physical conditions, and nutrient availability. Kenney Reservoir was sampled for phytoplankton and the sanitary-indicator bacteria total and fecal coliform and fecal streptococci.
Phytoplankton
Biological studies of lakes frequently begin with an investigation of the phytoplankton biomass. As the primary producers in the ecosystem of the lake, these organisms are fundamental to biological productivity. The taxonomy or classification of phytoplankton, commonly known as algae, varies somewhat among taxonomists. In this report the following divisions or phyla, taken from Prescott (1970), with modifications of Chrysophyta based on Patrick and Reimer (1966), are used:
Bacillariophyta - diatomsChlorophyta - green algaeCyanophyta - blue-green algaeChrysophyta - golden-brown algaeEuglenophyta - euglenoidsCryptophyta - cryptomonadsPyrrhophyta - dinoflagellates
Phytoplankton in this report are identified to the species level.
39
Table 8. Concentrations of trace constituents in Kenney Reservoir/ site 1, water years 1985-87
[ft, feet; °C, degrees Celsius; pS/ctn, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; Mg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; , no data]
Date
01/16/8501/16/85
09/06/8509/06/85
04/24/8604/24/86
08/20/8608/20/86
06/19/8706/19/87
Date
01/16/8501/16/85
09/06/8509/06/85
04/24/8604/24/86
08/20/8608/20/86
06/19/8706/19/87
Date
01/16/8501/16/85
09/06/8509/06/85
04/24/8604/24/86
08/20/8608/20/86
06/19/8706/19/87
Time
14301535
11051155
12251310
12251310
13251415
Time
14301535
11051155
12251310
12251310
13251415
Time
14301535
11051155
12251310
12251310
13251415
Sample depth (ft)
247
243
240
240
245
Sampledepth(ft)
2*7.
243
240
240
245
Sampledepth(ft)
247
243
240
240
245
0 .,.. Aluminum, Anti- A ._ Specific . , Arsenic Temper- e , . total mony, . . , * conduct- pH _ *' total ature , . ,. recover- total , /T( C) r o / \ able (Mg/L . ^tMfc/cmj (Mg/L A1) sb) As;
0.05.0
19.117.9
12.09.0
22.019.0
19.614.0
Cadmium,totalrecover
able(Mg/L Cd)
<!<1
21
<1<1
<1<1
<1<!
Mercury,total
recoverable
(Mg/L Hg)
0.2< !
.2
.2
.1
.1
< !< !
741 81,430 7
835 8932 8
865 8870 8
739 8756 8
511 8531 7
Chromium ,totalrecover
able(Mg/L Cr)
43
32
25
25
25
Molybdenum,totalrecover
able(Mg/L Mo)
22
35
<1<1
55
2< l
.3 140
.4 190
.3 70
.1 300
.5 190
.4 190
.5 179
.2 719
.8 100
.8 530
Cobalt,totalrecover
able
<1<1
<1<1
<1<1
<1<1
Copper,totalrecover
able(Mg/L Co) (Mg/L Cu)
<!4
521
<1<1
<11
<1<!
Nickel,totalrecover
able(Mg/L Ni)
1114
326
52
36
53
23
22
74
35
23
Selenium,total(Mg/L
<i9
22
21
22 --
Iron,totalrecover
able(Mg/L Fe)
1402,800
30220
250230
179789
170710
Silver,totalrecover
able
Barium, Beryllium ' total total
recover- recover able able
(Mg/L Ba) (Mg/L Be)
200<100
<100<100
100100
<100<100
<100<100
Lead,total
<10<10
<10<10
<10<10
<10<10
<10<10
Lithium,total
recover- recoverable able
(Mg/L Pb) (Mg/L Li)
6<1
22
42
5<5
<5<5
Strontium,dis
solvedSe) (Mg/L Ag) (Mg/L Sr)
32
33
66
22
<1o<1o<1o<1o<1< l
8601,300
990890
950920
889920
540540
1020
2020
2020
1020
OoOo
Strontium,totalrecover
able(Mg/L Sr) (
1,1001,200
600600
850910
829860
520520
' Boron, dis solved(Mg/L B)
5080
8090
8070
6070
4040
Manganese,totalrecover
able(Mg/L Mn)
101,700
2060
2020
20109
10140
Zinc,totalrecoverable
Mg/L Zn)
2020
2020
0010
<1010
0000
40
Phytoplankton densities will vary considerably from lake to lake and commonly show seasonal fluctuations or progressions within a given lake (Greeson, 1971). The ratios and dominance and(or) persistence of phytoplankton groups are sometimes used as an aid in lake classification (Hutchinson, 1967). Other investigators may use a diversity index such as that proposed by Wilhm and Dorris (1968). The diversity index (DI) is formulated as:
s n. n.
and is based on the relation of individuals per taxon (n.), the total number
of individuals in the sample (n) , and the total number of taxa or identifiable groups (s) in the sampled community.
Diversity index is a ratio of the number of species or other taxa to another important value, usually the total number of organisms in a sample of the community. The diversity index measures the evenness of distribution of individuals within the community (Greeson, 1982). The use of a diversity index as an indicator of water-quality conditions is based on the assumption that unpolluted water generally has a greater number of species, thus greater diversity index, than polluted water. The diversity index in unpolluted water is large because a benthic community can develop that has many species of relatively equal abundance. Persistent small values of diversity index are indicative of polluted or environmentally stressed water because this water will favor a relatively few species of tolerant organisms. Diversity index can range from zero (all organisms in the community belong to the same species) to any positive number. The upper limit, however, is about nine and most frequently is less than five.
Because phytoplankton distributions within a reservoir can vary, phyto plankton samples in Kenney Reservoir were collected at sites 1 and 2 from depths of maximum concentrations of dissolved oxygen (usually at the 2-ft depth) and as a composite of the euphotic zone. Phytoplankton identification, cell counts, percent composition, number of species, diversity index, biomass, and chlorophyll concentrations for sites 1 and 2 are listed in table 15 in the "Hydrologic Data" section.
A total of 210 phytoplankton species from 7 phyla were identified in Kenney Reservoir during 1985-87. Cell counts and phylum composition for diatoms, green algae, and blue-green algae from composite samples at sites 1 and 2, and from samples collected at the 2-ft depth at site 1, are shown in figure 18. Similar data for golden-brown algae, cryptomonads , euglenoids , and dinoflagellates are shown in figure 19.
41
15,000
10,000
5,000
SITE 1 (2-foot depth)
I BACILLARIOPHYTA (diatoms)I I CHLOROPHYTA (green algae)HI CYANOPHYTA (blue-green algae)
in in in
CC111Q_ C/)
_J 111o
ID O O
I
20,000
15,000 -
10,000 -
5,000 -
op op op
SITE 1 (composites)
T ob
in in inop op opob ii «^-CM «- CM
' ' -L00 O> O
00 03 00 00o to o> o>^ T to V00 O> tO
op op op in to to
opopopopopopopop
15,000
10,000
5,000
SITE 2 (composites)
d>CM «-
00obCM <-
ob d>
oo op 00 00 00to to r^ r^ r~ i-»op op op op op opo to d> in to to«? T T T T d>oo o> to r^ oo
DATE
Figure 18.--Cell counts and relative composition of the Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, and Cyanophyta in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2), water years 1985-87.
42
72,000
71,000 -
70,000 -
SITE 1 (2-foot depth)
CHRYSOPHYTA (golden-brown algae);:;x;:;j CRYPTOPHYTA (cryptomonads)
I | EUGLENOPHYTA (euglenoids)
PYRRHOPHYTA (dinoflagellates)
SITE 1 (composites)
800
600
400
200
SITE 2 (composites)
DATE
Figure 19. Cell counts and relative composition of the Chrysophyta, Cryptophyta, Euglenophyta, and Pyrrhophyta in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2), water years 1985-87.
43
Except for a dinoflagellate bloom in June 1987, diatoms, green algae, and blue-green algae were the most common phytoplankton in Kenney Reservoir during 1985-86. In 1987, blue-green algae and occasionally diatoms were dominant. Cell counts tended to increase from the inlet (site 2) to the dam (site 1). Maximum combined cell count (unrounded values) in the reservoir for the three dominant phyla was slightly greater than 15,000 cells/ml (site 1) in 1986 (fig. 18). Cell counts for the remaining four phyla intermittently ranged from 0 cells/mL to several hundred cells/mL, except for the dinoflagellate bloom in June 1987. Data comparisons of the four nondominant phyla indicated that cryptomonads and golden-brown algae generally were present in the largest concentrations. Because large concentrations of suspended material interfere in the laboratory analyses for biomass and chlorophyll, attempts to relate concentrations of biomass and chlorophylls a, b, and c with other biological measurements from the turbid water at Kenney Reservoir were inconclusive.
A comparison of phytoplankton species collected among 29 sample pairs (2-ft depth and composite samples) for 1985-86 was determined. For all 29 comparisons, a combined total of 228 species was identified as common in both samples. In addition to the common species in both samples, the composite samples contained 237 species not identified in the 2-ft depth samples. Conversely, 154 species were identified from the 2-ft depth samples that did not occur in composite samples. These comparisons indicate that although the composite method for phytoplankton collection alone would have yielded about 22 percent more species than collections obtained solely at the 2-ft depth, the presence or recurrence of 154 species during 1985 and 1986 would have gone undetected if the single-depth samples (2-ft) were omitted from the program.
In 1987, a phytoplankton bloom that was observed during most of June and consisted almost entirely of the dinoflagellate, Peridinium biceps, developed within the near-surface (depths generally less than 1 ft) water of the reservoir. Dark brown patches and stringers of concentrated phytoplankton growths were easily visible and seemed to resemble subsurface oil slicks. A maximum count of 71,000 cells/mL (fig. 19) was determined from a sample collected near site 1 on June 9, 1987. Large concentrations of dissolved oxygen (14.0-18.0 mg/L) from photosynthesis, large pH values (9.0-9.2), and large BOD from respiration (greater than 5 [(mg/L)/day] dissolved oxygen or 5-day BOD greater than 25 mg/L) were measured in water samples obtained from the concentrated growths of phytoplankton. By July, almost all indica tions of the phytoplankton bloom were gone.
The phytoplankton bloom in 1987 was the first bloom detected since the reservoir filled in late 1984. Conditions that may have contributed to the bloom and that were unique in 1987 when compared with previous years are listed below:
1. Mean annual inflows to the reservoir (site 3) in 1985 and 1986 were about 1,160 ft3/s; in 1987, the mean annual inflow was about 750 ft3/s. More notably, mean monthly discharge for June 1985 was about 2,900 ft 3 /s and for June 1986 was about 3,100 ft3/s, but decreased to about 1,000 ft3/s for June 1987. As a result, hydraulic residence time, water clarity, and water temperature, which may be the major causative factors for the bloom in Kenney Reservoir, were greater in June 1987 than during the same month in 1985-86.
44
2. On several occasions during April-June 1987, concentrations of organic nitrogen that ranged from 1.0 to 1.7 mg/L and total and(or) dissolved phosphorus concentrations that ranged from 0.3 to 0.62 mg/L were deter mined in the White River at site 3. During the same period in 1985-86, concentrations of organic nitrogen at site 3 were 1.0 mg/L or less, and phosphorus concentrations were 0.3 mg/L or less. The large nutrient concentrations in the White River in the spring of 1987 resulted in large nutrient concentrations in Kenney Reservoir prior to the phytoplankton bloom in June. However, because nitrogen and phosphorus do not seem to decrease to concentrations that would limit algal growth, other factors, such as residence time and water clarity, probably affect algal growth in the reservoir.
Values for diversity index for all samples of phytoplankton ranged from 0.11 to 3.99 at the dam (site 1) and from 0.18 to 4.02 near the inlet (site 2). The maximum and minimum diversity-index values for each sampling period for all phytoplankton samples collected in Kenney Reservoir during 1985-87 are shown in figure 20. For most of the sampling period, the diversity-index values were greater near the inlet (site 2) than near the dam (site 1). The slightly lesser diversity index and the general increases in cell counts of blue-green algae near the dam, when compared with data near the inlet, may indicate the effects of the hydrologic change from a river envi ronment to a lake environment.
6.00
X 4.00LUQz
CC. UJ
Q 2.00
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
I I I I . I I
J FMAMJJASONOJFMAMJJASONDJ FMAMJ JASON
MONTHS
1985 1986 1987
Figure 20.--Maximum and minimum values of diversity index for all samples of phytoplankton collected in Kenney Reservoir, water years 1985-87.
45
Bacteria
Total and fecal coliform and fecal streptococci bacteria are natural inhabitants of the intestinal tract of man and other animals. As such, they are excreted in large numbers. A healthy person would not normally excrete pathogenic organisms; however, should illness develop, these organisms could occur in the feces. The presence of large numbers of fecal coliform and fecal streptococci bacteria in water provides warning of the potential presence of waterborne pathogenic organisms (Federal Water Quality Administration, 1971).
Knowing whether the fecal coliform bacteria originated from human or other animals would be helpful in interpreting or locating the source of contamination. To assist in this determination, the ratio of fecal coliform to fecal streptococci (FC/FS) sometimes is used. A ratio greater than 4.0 indicates a human-waste source; a ratio less than 1.0 indicates a predomi nantly livestock and(or) poultry source (Federal Water Quality Administration, 1971). The State of Colorado (Colorado Department of Health, 1978) has set forth the following criteria for recreational water:
ClassFecal coliform bacteria
(colonies per 100 milliliters)Geometric mean
Class I - Primary contact Class II - Secondary contact
2001,000
Because Kenney Reservoir is used for recreation, concentrations of total and fecal coliform and fecal streptococci bacteria were determined from the 2-ft and near-bottom depths at sites 1 and 2 for all sample collections during 1985-86 (tables 13 and 14 in the "Hydrologic Data" section). The range of colony counts per 100 milliliters that were determined after controlled incubations are as follows: total coliform bacteria less than 2 to 1,100; fecal coliform bacteria less than 2 to 380; and fecal streptococci bacteria less than 3 to 960. Maximum values for all three bacteria groups occurred at site 2.
Patterns of concentrations of fecal coliform and fecal streptococci bacteria collected from the 2-ft depths at sites 1 and 2 were representative of the bacteria groups in general and are compared in figure 21. Colony counts for both bacteria groups were greatest during the spring and early summer when overland runoff was high and were least during base-flow conditions. Because suspended solids can absorb organic material, bacteria densities mostly decreased from the inlet (site 2) to the dam (site 1) as suspended material settled to the bottom of the reservoir. The FC/FS ratios were less than 2.0 and generally were less than 1.0. Because the FC/FS ratios were substantially less than 4, the sources of the bacteria in Kenney Reservoir most likely were indigenous to the basin and not from nearby human origins.
46
800
600
400
200
SITE 1 (2-foot depth)
o o
UJ
z go o
1,200
FECAL COLIFORM
FECAL STREPTOCOCCI
1,000
800
600
400
200
DATE
Figure 21. Concentrations of fecal coliform and fecal streptococci bacteria collected at the 2-foot depths in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2), water years 1985-86.
47
SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT CHARACTERISTICS
Fluvial sediment, as defined by Colby (1963), is sediment transported by or suspended in water or that has been deposited in beds by water. The source of sediment in streams is derived principally from sheet erosion and channel erosion. Sheet erosion removes sediment rather uniformly from an area, and channel erosion erodes the beds and banks of streams when the flowing water has the capability of transporting additional sediment. Channel erosion usually is evident downstream from reservoirs, where the relatively sediment- free streamflow will degrade the stream channel as the channel begins to achieve equilibrium with sediment-transport capacity.
Sediment is transported in suspension (suspended-sediment load) and as particles along the streambed (bedload). The suspended-sediment load commonly consists of clay, silt, and sand that usually travel at the velocity of the stream and that are held in suspension by the upward components of turbulent currents or by colloidal forces. Bedload consists of coarser sized sediment that comes from the bed and banks of the stream. Particles moving as bedload remain close to the streambed, usually within a few grain diameters for uniform sediment (Colby, 1963). The suspended-sediment load plus the bedload compose the total-sediment load.
Sediment deposition in water is dependent upon particle-fall velocity and the transporting capability of the water. Fall velocity of a particle is dependent upon the difference in density between the particle and the water, the viscosity of the water, and the size, shape, and flocculation of the particles. Flocculation is dependent upon the size, shape, and composition of the particles and on the turbulence and chemical properties of the water (Colby, 1963). Fluvial sediment generally is deposited in lakes or reser voirs, stream channels, or flood plains. Concepts of fluvial sediment are discussed in Colby (1963) and Guy (1970a).
Fluvial Sediment
Instantaneous suspended-sediment load (L ), in tons per day, is a function of water discharge (Q) in cubic feet per second, sediment concen tration (C) in milligrams per liter, and the conversion constant 0.0027. Suspended-sediment load is calculated as follows:
L = 0.0027 QC. (2) s
Annual loads of suspended sediment transported by the White River at site 3 for water years 1983-87 were estimated from least-square regressions that related instantaneous suspended-sediment load to instantaneous water discharge. Three regressions were developed from periodic samples using log- transformed data for concentrations of suspended sediment and instantaneous water discharge for water years 1983-87. The data were selectively grouped to define the suspended-sediment load and water-discharge characteristics for hydrologic seasons as follows: (1) The rising and peak flows during spring and early summer from snowmelt runoff; (2) the receding streamflows of summer that follow the peak snowmelt conditions; and (3) the base flows of fall and winter. The regressions used to relate suspended-sediment loads to water discharge for the three hydrologic seasons at site 3 are shown in figure 22.
48
RISING AND PEAK FLOW-SPRING AND EARLY SUMMER
C/J < CO
Q cc.LLJ 0_C/J
REGRESSION LINE
95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION
LOG (Ls) = 1.49 LOG ( Q )-1.025 0.76
RECEDING FLOW-SUMMER
Q < O
QLLJ C/J
Q LUQZLU Q_ C/J D C/J C/J D O
<
C/J
LOG (Ls ) = 2.39 LOG (Q)-4.53 r 2 = 0.85
BASE FLOW-FALL AND WINTER
LOG ( Ls ) =» 3.23 LOG ( Q J-6.73 r 2 =0.41
INSTANTANEOUS WATER DISCHARGE (Q), IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND (LOG BASE 10)
Figure 22.--Relations of suspended-sediment loads to water discharge for three hydrologic seasons in the White River (site 3), water years 1983-87.
49
Instantaneous bedload was measured at site 3 during 1984-86 from 18 samples of bedload. The samples were collected with a Helley-Smith bedload sampler using the techniques described by Emmett (1980). Each sample was collected in conjunction with samples for suspended sediment at identical locations in the stream. Instantaneous bedload (£h), in tons per day, is a
function of sampled bedload weight (&O, in grams, width of the stream (D ),
in feet, the conversion constant 0.0952, horizontal width of the sampler intake (S ), in feet, number of verticals (N), and the time of sampling per
IV
vertical (T), in seconds. Instantaneous bedload is calculated as follows:
W, D 0.0952L = -^ K (3) Lb S N T U; w
Instantaneous bedloads were compared with instantaneous suspended- sediment loads that were collected simultaneously with bedload data (table 9). For a water-discharge range of 599-6,090 ft3/s, bedload was less than 1.2 percent of the suspended-sediment load. Because bedload was small at site 3, it was not considered a substantial part of the estimated annual sedi ment loads to Kenney Reservoir.
The regression estimates of instantaneous suspended-sediment load (L )O
were assumed applicable for computing daily suspended-sediment load (L ,) from
daily mean water discharges (£> ,) for the three hydrologic seasons. Because
bias may be introduced when using log-transformed data for regression analy sis, a bias correction factor (C, ), as presented by Ferguson (1986) and
discussed by Elliott and Defeyter (1986), was applied to each regression. The bias correction factor for conversion from common logarithms to the general antilogarithm form is a function of the regression variance (s 2 ) and is expressed as follows:
(4)
where e equals 2.71828 and is the base for natural logarithms. The general antilogarithm form of the regressions shown in figure 21 combined with the bias correction factor is as follows:
Ls = 10a Qb Cb , (5)
where a is the regression constant and b is the regression coefficient. Using the assumption that
50
the regressions used to compute mean daily suspended-sediment loads (L ,) from
daily water discharge (Q ,) for the hydrologic seasons are:
Rising and peak flow Lsd = KT 1 - 025 J^1 - 491 1.207 (7)
Receding flow Lsd = 10~ 4 - 53 g 2.386 1<165 ( 8 )
Base flow L . = 1(T6 - 725 Q 3 - 23 1.642 (9)sa or
The computed daily suspended-sediment loads were summed to determine annual suspended-sediment loads in the lower White River.
Annual suspended-sediment loads for the 5 water years, 1983-87, in the White River at site 3, and annual suspended-sediment loads for the 9 water years, 1973-81, for the discontinued streamflow-gaging station 09306300, are plotted in figure 23. The sediment data from station 09306300 were computed using the procedures discussed previously and are included in figure 23 to improve the definition of suspended-sediment transport for years of low flow in the lower White River. Although analysis of covariance at the 0.05 level of significance indicated that the annual suspended-sediment loads and water discharges from both sites might be combined into one regression, two regres sions were used because of the distance between the sites (12 mi) and because concurrent data were not collected at the sites. Comparisons are further limited because annual suspended-sediment loads could not be determined for similar ranges of annual water discharge at either site.
Analysis of data (figs. 22 and 23) indicated that during water years 1983-87 annual suspended-sediment loads in the lower White River at site 3 ranged from about 391,000 tons in 1987 to about 1,570,000 tons in 1984. Mean annual suspended-sediment load at site 3 for 1983-87 was approximately 1,040,000 tons. For the 3 water years (1985-87) of reservoir existence, however, annual suspended-sediment loads at site 3 ranged from 391,000 to 1,070,000 tons. During 1973-81, when annual water discharge at station 09306300 ranged from 312 fts/s (about 226,000 acre-ft) to 766 fts/s (about 555,000 acre-ft), annual suspended-sediment loads near the present dam site (fig. 2) ranged from about 104,000 tons in 1977 to about 747,000 tons in 1978. The mean annual suspended-sediment load at station 09306300 for 1973-81 was approximately 482,000 tons. Improved regressions for estimating annual suspended-sediment loads for medium- and low-flow runoff years in the White River at site 3 should be possible when additional data are collected.
Additional short-term, but large, discharges of sediment to the main stem of the White River may occur from tributary basins during intense thunder storms. As an example, an estimated 290,000 tons of sediment transport from the Piceance basin was reported from a single storm near the mouth of Yellow Creek (fig. 1) in 1978 (U.S. Geological Survey, 1979). Although evidence of this event is inferred in figure 23, such events may go undetected when samples are collected periodically.
51
Table 9. Size distributions of bedload and suspended sediment in the White Uiver at site 3, water years 1954-57
[ft3/s, cubic feet per second; mm, millimeters; , no data]
Date
05/01/8405/17/8406/01/8406/06/8406/08/84
06/14/8406/29/8407/13/8411/30/8404/23/85
05/29/8506/13/8504/23/8605/08/8606/02/86
06/05/8606/11/8606/19/8605/01/8705/16/87
Date
05/01/8405/17/8406/01/8406/06/8406/08/84
06/14/8406/29/8407/13/8411/30/8404/23/85
05/29/8506/13/8504/23/8605/08/8606/02/86
06/05/8606/11/8606/19/8605/01/8705/16/87
Water Bed- Suspended-dis- load, sediment
_,. charge, instan- load,instan- taneous instantaneous (tons/ taneous(ft 3/s) day) (tons/day)
1030 957 17.2 2,8401130 4,760 14.2 37,8001145 5,210 24.0 27,1001530 5,140 24.0 22,5001100 6,090 50.0 42,900
1345 3,960 32.0 15,2001230 3,300 27.0 6,0501120 1,760 17.0 1,9501130 599 2.8 2461400 1,890 29.0 10,100
1500 3,760 50.5 11,1001500 3,500 22.6 8,1401300 1,246 13.7 3,9401330 2,404 28.2 5,1701300 3,260 61.8 5,270
1100 3,280 60.0 6,2401015 3,275 14.6 7,3801300 2,290 16.8 2,2501500 2,000 7,8801510 2,140 4,920
Sediment, Sediment,percentage percentagefiner than finer than0.062 mm 0. 125 mm
(bed- (sus- (bed- (sus-load) pended) load) pended)
1.0 86.0 3.6 92.0.7 78.0 2.2 91.0.9 76.0 2.4 89.0
1.3 75.0 2.6 88.01.0 82.0 2.3 92.0
1.5 75.0 2.7 89.0.5 67.0 1.2 85.0.3 77.0 0.5 90.0
1.4 86.0 1.6 93.01.2 75.0 3.5 87.0
1.6 57.0 5.4 79.01.9 59.0 3.1 82.01.1 64.0 3.8 83.0.7 64.0 3.3 77.0.3 62.0 1.5 75.0
.6 65.0 2.5 77.0
.6 76.0 2.5 88.0
.2 66.0 0.7 76.062.0 81.059.0 78.0
Sediment,percentagefiner than0.002 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
28.024.022.024.029.0
20.014.07.0
21.026.0
13.015.015.018.016.0
17.024.017.016.014.0
Sediment ,percentagefiner than0.250 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
36.1 98.05.6 99.09.5 98.07.5 97.06.8 99.0
5.7 97.03.6 97.01.6 98.0
17.4 99.018.6 96.0
33.8 94.024.4 96.034.3 96.035.4 94.010.4 92.0
13.4 91.029.4 97.09.2 91.0
96.093.0
Sediment,percentagefiner than0.004 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
41.032.023.030.038.0
24.016.018.023.032.0
16.020.022.024.021.0
22.029.023.020.019.0
Sediment,percentagefiner than0.500 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
93.9 100.040.3 100.053.4 100.060.6 99.033.7 100.0
48.4 100.055.4 100.055.1 100.064.9 100.081.7 100.0
77.8 100.071.3 100.083.5 100.088.0 99.054.1 100.0
59.6 99.080.6 100.055.0 99.0
100.099.0
Sediment,percentagefiner than0.016 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
64.053.046.046.057.0
44.032.040.053.051.0
28.031.036.040.034.0
36.046.037.032.032.0
Sediment,percentagefiner than1.00 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
97.4 100.052.5 100.067.2 100.076.7 100.044.4 100.0
66.4 100.077.6 100.088.9 100.092.3 100.091.2 100.0
90.8 100.087.5 100.096.2 100.097.0 100.077.2 100.0
85.2 100.093.3 100.078.2 100.0
100.0100.0
52
Table 9.--Size distributions of bedload and suspended sediment in the White River at site 3, water years 1984-87 Continued
Ha t~ e* LJa L-C
05/01/8405/17/8406/01/8406/06/8406/08/84
06/14/8406/29/8407/13/8411/30/8404/23/85
05/29/8506/13/8504/23-8605/08/8606/02/86
06/05/8606/11/8606/19/8605/01/8705/16/87
Sediment,percentagefiner than2.00 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
99.261.374.183.952.2
74.487.197.598.294.0
95.593.999.199.084.8
92.696.888.6 --
Sediment,percentagefiner than4.00 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
99.871.879.988.561.2
80.392.799.599.697.9
97.797.399.599.688.2
95.898.593.6-_--
Sediment,percentagefiner than8.00 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
99.984.087.091.573.4
85.995.5100.0100.098.7
99.298.8100.099.791.8
98.399.797.0__
Sediment,percentagefiner than16.00 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
100.094.194.194.588.4
93.397.0100.0
100.0
99.8100.0
..100.096.6
99.8100.0100.0
..--
Sediment,percentagefiner than32.00 mm
(bed- (sus-load) pended)
__ --100.0100.097.299.1
97.897.0 __--
100.0_...__
100.0
100.0..__ --
Sediment,percentagefiner than64.
(bed-load)
______
100.0100.0
100.0100.0
---_--
..------
__
_-------
.00 mm(sus
pended)
________--
__--__..--
..__----
______--
2,000,000
yj 1,800,000z o2 1,600,000
Q^ 1,400,000_i I- Z 1,200,000
2 1,000,000
QQ 800,000Z UJ Q. </) 600,000
< 400,000
Zz< 200,000
REGRESSION LINE
95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION
WHITE RIVER-Site 3
STATION 09306300-White River near Rangely
1978 Water year A
Load = 1.72 (Discharge) -288,700 r2 = 0.86
Load= 2.53 (Discharge) -972,700 r2 = 0.90
200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000
ANNUAL WATER DISCHARGE, IN ACRE-FEET
1,200,000
Figure 23.--Relations of annual suspended-sediment loads to annual water discharge for the White River at site 3 (water years 1983-87) and at station 09306300 (water years 1973-81).
53
Twenty samples of suspended sediment were collected from a range of water discharge during 1984-87 and analyzed for particle-size distribution (table 9). Variations in size composition of suspended sediment seemed to be independent of changes in sediment concentration, water discharge, and sediment loads. Average values, standard deviations, and ranges of size composition for the 20 samples are listed below:
Size [mm =
ClaySiltSand
(finer(0.(0.
004062
category millimeter]
Averagecomposition (rounded to nearest
than 0.004 mm)toto
finer than 0finer than 2
.062 mm)
.00 mm)
percent)
254629
Standard deviation (percent)
769
Minimum value
(percent)
163914
Maximum value
(percent)
416343
Bedload was mostly sand (about 86 percent sand and about 13 percent gravel). Variations in size composition of bedload were independent of water discharge and sediment load.
Sediment Retention in the Reservoir
Because water-discharge and sediment data were not collected immediately downstream from the dam, direct measurements of sediment retention and reser voir trap efficiency of Kenney Reservoir were not possible. However, indirect estimates of sediment retention and trap efficiency in the reservoir were determined from data comparisons of samples for suspended solids (tables 13 and 14 in the "Hydrologic Data" section) collected from the 2-ft and near bottom depths within the reservoir at sites 1 and 2. In addition, data for suspended solids in the reservoir were compared with suspended-sediment data in the White River at site 3.
Concentrations of suspended solids generally decreased from the inlet (site 2) to the dam (site 1). The percent retention of suspended solids for a range of water discharge is shown in figure 24. The percent retention in con centrations of suspended solids from site 2 to site 1 ranged from about 65 to 98 percent when inflow was less than 1,000 ft3/s; the percentage decreased to about 30 to 80 percent when inflow was greater than 2,500 ft3/s (fig. 24). These values should approximate the percent retention or reservoir trap effi ciency of clay and perhaps, very fine silts that entered the reservoir. Sedi ment particles that had general fall velocities in excess of 1 mm per second, such as coarse silts and sands, most likely were deposited along the reservoir bottom before the samples for suspended solids were collected. Assuming a generally small value of approximately 65 percent retention of clay and total retention of silt and sand in the reservoir, the estimated total sediment retention of the reservoir during high runoff years was calculated as 0.65 (25 percent clay) plus 1.00 (46 percent silt) plus 1.00 (29 percent sand) or equal to about 91 percent of the suspended sediment that entered Kenney Reservoir.
54
Concentrations of suspended solids at sites 1 and 2 in Kenney Reservoir were compared with concentrations of suspended sediment measured in the White River (site 3). Although direct comparison of suspended solids with suspended sediment may include some analytical and sampling error, both methods provide an acceptable measure of suspended matter in water. Data were evaluated for approximate time of travel between site 3 and the reservoir (approximately 2 to 5 hours) and for residence time within the reservoir (table 2). Eight sets of data that had collection times between sites that approximated the down stream time of travel were selected. Comparison of data within each set indicated that when daily suspended-sediment loads exceeded 100 tons in the White River, suspended-sediment concentrations decreased about 74 percent from the White River (site 3) to the inlet (site 2) and decreased about 94 percent from the White River (site 3) to the dam (site 1).
Daily concentrations of suspended solids at site 1 were estimated from regressions that related instantaneous concentrations of suspended solids for the 2-ft and near-bottom depths and an average of both depths at site 1 with reservoir inflow measured at site 3. The coefficients of determination (r 2 ) of the 3 regressions ranged from 0.43 to 0.71. Because the reservoir capacity is small, it was assumed that daily mean water discharge to the reservoir approximated daily mean water discharge from the reservoir. Mean daily and mean annual suspended-solids loads that theoretically were discharged from the 2-ft or near-bottom depths at site 1 were determined using the regression estimates for daily concentrations of suspended solids and inflow discharge.
100 c/j Q_i oc/3G 80UJQZUJO-c/3D 60
O DC UJ Q_
20
2-FOOT DEPTH
A NEAR BOTTOM
I
1,000 2,000 3,000
WATER DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
4,000
Figure 24.--Percent retention of suspended solids in Kenney Reservoir computed from a comparison of data near the inlet (site 2) and at the dam (site 1) for a range of water discharge, water years 1985-87.
55
Mean daily suspended-sediment loads for site 3 and mean daily suspended-solids loads computed as the average of the 2-ft and near-bottom depths at site 1 for 1985-87 are compared in figure 25. Annual suspended-sediment loads for site 3 and estimated suspended-solids loads at site 1 at the 2-ft and near-bottom depths are listed below:
Site 3 Site 1 (2-foot depth)
Site 1 (near-bottom depth)
Suspended- sedimentWater year
198519861987
Load (tons per year)
1,070,0001,000,000391,000
Yield (tons per
square mile)
424396154
Estimated suspended-
solids load (tons per year)
27,10023,9006,800
Percent of suspended load at site 3
2.52.41.7
Estimated suspended-
solids load (tons per year)
34,40031,90014,100
Percent of suspended load at site 3
3.23.23.6
A comparison of the data for suspended-sediment loads in the White River at site 3 with the estimated suspended-solids loads discharged from the dam at site 1 indicates that the sediment retention in Kenney Reservoir may be as great as 96 to 98 percent.
16,000
Q 12,000CCLU Q_
8,000
oLUo
a.</> 4,000
Mean daily suspended-sediment loads. White River at site 3
Mean daily water discharge, White River at site 3
Estimated mean daily suspended-solids loads discharged from Kenney Reservoir at site 1
16,000
O (J
12,000
Q_H-
oCDD
8,000 Oz
4,000
(J oCC LU
I
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY
MONTHS
JUNE JULY AUG SEPT
Figure 25.--Mean daily suspended-sediment loads and mean daily water discharge in the White River at site 3 and estimated mean daily suspended-solids loads discharged from Kenney Reservoir at site 1, water years 1985-87.
56
The estimated values of sediment retention, by using the three previously described methods, ranged from 91 to 98 percent. These results are large when compared with estimates for sediment retention developed from methods of Brune (1953) and Churchill (1948). Brune developed a set of curves for estimating sediment retention based on capacity-inflow ratios. The application of Brune's curves to Kenney Reservoir indicates that sediment retention would range from about 50 to 75 percent. Churchill's method, which uses capacity-inflow data and mean velocity of flow through the reservoir, indicated that sediment reten tion in Kenney Reservoir would be about 85 percent. The methods of Brune and Churchill, however, do not completely address size distribution of sediment. The coarse size composition (about 75 percent sand and silt) and related rapid deposition within the reservoir of the suspended sediment from the White River probably account for most of the differences between the estimates of sediment retention presented in this report and the estimates by using the methods of Brune and Churchill. Data for reservoir percent retention of suspended solids (fig. 24), however, are within the range of estimates of sediment retention by using the methods of Brune and Churchill.
A method for deriving original volume and compacted sediment volume displacement and percent loss of original reservoir capacity from methods of reservoir operation and average size composition of input sediment loads is presented in Strand and Pemberton (1982). The method of Strand and Pemberton, as applied to Kenney Reservoir, is exemplified in table 10. Based on a 91-percent sediment retention for the reservoir and the annual suspended- sediment load data at station 09306300 and site 3, annual volume displacement during 1973-87 would have ranged from about 0.5 percent in 1977 to about 7 percent in 1984 of the original reservoir capacity. After completion of the reservoir in late 1984, the estimated capacity loss ranged from about 1.8 percent in 1987, when the annual suspended-sediment load equaled about 391,000 tons, to about 5 percent in 1985, when the annual suspended-sediment load was approximately 1,070,000 tons.
By using the mean annual suspended-sediment load of 1,040,000 tons (site 3) for 1983-87, about 4.5 to about 5.0 percent of the original reservoir capacity would have been displaced by sediment in a year of average stream- flow. If, however, the mean annual suspended-sediment load of 482,000 tons determined for discontinued gaging station 09306300 for 1973-81 is used, then the projected loss of original reservoir capacity would have been about 2.2 percent during a year of average water discharge.
Volume displacement and percent loss of original reservoir capacity for estimates of sediment retention are shown in figure 26. Not shown in figure 26 are possible additional increases in volume displacement that might result from occasional major runoff events from the semi-arid tributary basins upstream from the reservoir. Capacity loss may be less if near-bottom currents within the reservoir discharged scoured sediments through the bottom release outlet.
57
Table 10. Examples of computations of volume displacement from sediment loads to Kenney Reservoir
I. PROGRAM TO COMPUTE INITIAL AND FINAL WEIGHT PER VOLUME OF SEDIMENT IN RESERVOIRS (from Strand and Pemberton, 1982)
a. Reservoir operation coefficient (Or) (Or) Description
1. Sediment always submerged or nearly submerged2. Normally moderate to considerable reservoir drawdown3. Reservoir normally empty4. Riverbed sediments
b. Coefficients for sediment size per reservoir operation (Or)
Or
Initial weight (mass) in Ibs/cubic foot _________(Kg/cubic meter)_________
Time compaction (K) for inch Ib _______(metric units)______
Clay (We) Silt (Wm) Sand (Ws) Clay (We) Silt (Wm) Sand (Ws)English Metric English Metric English Metric English Metric English Metric English Metric
1234
26354060
416561641961
70717273
1,1201,1401,1501,170
97979797
1,5501,5501,5501,550
168.40
256135
0
5.71.80
91290
000
000
Data inputEnter reservoir coefficient- Enter clay percent- -- Enter silt percent----------Enter sand percent- -------
Enter compaction time (T) in years---> Enter reservoir capacity (C)--------->Enter annual sediment load-------- ->
125 %46 %29 %
20 years13,800 acre-feet
1,040,000 tons (average 1983-87)
d. Calculations
Initial weight(IW) = (Wc)(%c) IW = 66.830
(Wm)(%ro) + (Ws)(%s)
Final weight(FW) = IW + 0.04343(K)[(T/T-1)(log eK = 6.622 FW = 73.023
II. VOLUME DISPLACEMENT IN ACRE-FEET (data for original reservoir capacity)
At 91% retention At 98% retention
Annualsedimentload(tons)
100,000200,000300,000400,000500,000
600,000700,000800,000900,000
1,000,000
1,100,0001,200,0001,300,0001,400,0001,500,0001,600,000
Initialvolumedisplace
ment(acre-feet)
63125188250313
375438500563625
688750813875938
1,000
Initialcapacity
loss(percent)
0.450.911.361.812.27
2.723.173.624.084.53
4.985.445.896.346.807.25
Volumeafter(T=20)years
(acre-feet)
57114172229286
343401458515572
629687744801858915
Capacityloss after
(T=20)years
(percent)
0.410.831.241.662.07
2.492.903.323.734.15
4.564.985.395.806.226.63
Initialvolumedisplacement
(acre-feet)
67135202269337
404471539606673
741808875943
1,0101,077
Initialcapacity
loss(percent)
0.490.981.461.952.44
2.933.423.904.394.88
5.375.856.346.837.327.81
Volumeafter(T=20)years
(acre-feet)
62123185246308
370431493555616
678739801863924986
Capacityloss after
(T=20)years
(percent)
0.450.891.341.792.23
2.683.133.574.024.47
4.915.365.806.256.707.14
58
zat
SIS!!
o
1.4
1.2
L Z 0.8 < (/) D O 0.6
z t0.4
0.2
Data collections (1985-87)
Methods of Churchill (1948)
Methods of Brune (1953)
QC en 01 CL QC
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
(MILLIONS)
ANNUAL SUSPENDED-SEDIMENT LOAD, IN TONS
1.8
Figure 26.--Volume displacement and percent loss of original reservoir capacity from annual suspended-sediment loads to Kenney Reservoir as estimated from data collections during water years 1985-87 and methods of Brune (1953) and Churchill (1948).
59
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The construction of Taylor Draw Dam and filling of Kenney Reservoir during 1984 were done in response to increased water-management needs in northwestern Colorado. To evaluate possible processes and changes that may occur in the reservoir after filling and the effects of sediment transport to the reservoir, physical, chemical, and biological data needed to be collected to define seasonal variations in vertical and areal water-quality character istics. Physical, chemical, and biological data collected during the first 3 years of reservoir operation (1985-87) are presented and summarized for two sites in Kenney Reservoir. Related water-quality data and sediment character istics during 1983-87 are summarized for one site on the White River about 8 mi upstream from the reservoir. Data from the three sites were compared to determine and evaluate changes in water-quality characteristics caused by impoundment. In addition, fluvial sediment loads were determined for the White River upstream from the reservoir for 1983-87, and sediment retention in the reservoir was estimated. During 1983-87, the mean annual discharge in the White River (site 3) was about 174 percent of the mean annual discharge for the period of record (1973-81) at a discontinued streamflow-gaging station near the present dam site.
Water temperature, specific conductance, pH, and dissolved oxygen at various depths were measured at the dam (site 1) and near the reservoir inlet (site 2). Some stratification developed during summer when temperatures at site 1 generally decreased 3 to 5 °C from the surface to the bottom. Maximum surface temperatures in the reservoir were 23.8 °C at site 1 and 24.4 °C at site 2. Surface temperatures in the reservoir during summer were similar to temperatures measured in the White River at site 3 during summer.
After initial flushing, specific conductance in the reservoir ranged from 374 to 932 pS/cm, and values for the White River at site 3 ranged from 375 to 963 fJS/cm. Specific conductance was least during snowmelt runoff in May and June and greatest during low flow in fall and winter. Specific conductance varied little with depth. Lateral differences between sites were attributed to variations in discharge and time of travel. Predicted values of dissolved- solids concentrations from regression relations between values of specific conductance and concentrations of dissolved solids were similar at all three sites.
Measured values of pH in Kenney Reservoir generally ranged from 7.4 to 8.8; exceptions to this range of pH (9.0 to 9.2) occurred in localized water that contained a phytoplankton bloom in June 1987. Values of pH exceeded 8.5 only in near-surface water that was supersaturated with dissolved oxygen. Values of pH decreased with depth and were least (about 7.4 to 8.0) near the bottom of the reservoir. The small values of pH were attributed to the accumulation of C02 by respiration and other byproducts of organic decomposi tion. Values from periodic measurements of pH in the White River (site 3) during 1985-87 ranged from 8.0 to 8.8.
Concentrations of dissolved oxygen in the reservoir at sites 1 and 2 generally ranged from 2.3 to 10.1 mg/L; measured values in the White River (site 3) during 1985-87 ranged from 7.8 to 12.5 mg/L. A concentration of 0.0 mg/L was measured near the bottom at site 1 shortly after the reservoir filled. Maximum concentrations of dissolved oxygen (14.0 to 18.0 mg/L) in the
60
reservoir occurred in locally concentrated areas of a phytoplankton bloom in June 1987. Dissolved oxygen at the dam (site 1) decreased with depth during summer but concentrations remained equal to or greater than 4.0 mg/L in depths less than 35 ft. Supersaturation of dissolved oxygen from photosynthesis occurred in shallow depths at both reservoir sites. Biological activies such as respiration and decomposition decreased the dissolved-oxygen concentration at near-bottom depths. Except for two samples collected from localized growths of phytoplankton in June 1987, 5-day BOD in Kenney Reservoir ranged from 0.7 to 2.3 mg/L. The 5-day BOD in samples collected from the phyto plankton bloom in June 1987 exceeded 25 mg/L. Generally, BOD was slightly less in Kenney Reservoir when compared with BOD in the White River.
Secchi-disk measurements in the reservoir ranged from 11 to 144 in. Turbidity in NTU measured at 2-ft depths was least (1.2 NTU) at site 1 and greatest (220 NTU) at site 2. Data comparisons indicated that light penetra tion and general water clarity improved substantially from the inlet (site 2) to the dam (site 1), especially during low-flow periods.
Major ion types in the White River and Kenney Reservoir were similar and ranged from a hard to very hard calcium bicarbonate type when discharge in the White River exceeded 3,500 ft3/s. When flows were less than 400 ft3/s, water- quality type was a very hard calcium magnesium sulfate bicarbonate.
Concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and total organic carbon in Kenney Reservoir and in the White River varied with season and runoff condi tions. Concentrations of ammonia as nitrogen, nitrite plus nitrate as nitro gen, and organic nitrogen generally were greatest in the White River (site 3) during spring runoff and least in near-surface waters at the dam (site 1) during fall. Ammonia concentrations as great as 0.13 mg/L were generated from biological decomposition near the reservoir bottom during summer; however, concentrations of ammonia may increase if anaerobic conditions develop.
Concentrations of dissolved phosphorus most frequently were less than 0.1 mg/L in the White River (site 3) and less than 0.05 mg/L in Kenney Reservoir. Large concentrations of nitrogen (greater than 1.5 mg/L) and phosphorus (0.3 to 0.62 mg/L) were measured in the White River during spring runoff in 1987. These large nutrient concentrations preceded a phytoplankton bloom that occurred in Kenney Reservoir during June 1987.
Twenty-two trace constituents were sampled from near-surface and near- bottom depths during high- and low-flow periods at site 1. Concentrations of iron and manganese were greater than 1,000 M8/^ only in the first sample collected near the reservoir bottom at site 1 in January 1985. Except for the one-time measurements of total recoverable iron and manganese in January 1985 and the concentrations of total recoverable mercury (as much as 0.2 |Jg/L), all concentrations of trace constituents were less than the recommended concentra tions established by the State of Colorado for cold-water biota. Concentra tions of total recoverable copper, mercury, and zinc tended to be slightly greater in the White River than concentrations measured in Kenney Reservoir.
A total of 210 species from 7 phyla of phytoplankton were identified from single depth and composite samples collected in Kenney Reservoir. Bacillariophyta (diatoms) and chlorophyta (green algae) were the most common
61
phytoplankton collected during 1985-86; cyanophyta (blue-green algae) were dominant in 1987. Cell counts increased during summer and were greater at site 1 than at site 2. Except for an algae bloom in June 1987, the maximum combined cell count (unrounded value) for the three major phyla (diatoms, green algae, and blue-green algae) was slightly greater than 15,000 cells/mL.
Species compositions of phytoplankton samples collected from the 2-ft depth in 1985 and 1986 were compared with concurrent collections of composite samples of the euphotic zone. Although the composite method for phytoplankton collection alone would have yielded about 22 percent more species than collec tions obtained solely at the 2-ft depth, the presence or reoccurrence of 154 species during 1985 and 1986 would have gone undetected if the single depth samples (2-ft) were omitted from the program.
In June 1987, a phytoplankton bloom that consisted almost entirely of the dinoflagellate, Peridinium biceps, developed in the reservoir. Subsurface growths that appeared as dark brown patches and stringers contained counts of 71,000 cells/mL. Large concentrations of dissolved oxygen (14.0-18.0 mg/L), pH (9.0-9.2 units), and 5-day BOD (greater than 25 mg/L) were measured in water that contained the phytoplankton growths. Increases in the hydraulic residence time, water clarity, water temperature, and possibly nutrient concentrations in Kenney Reservoir in 1987, when compared with 1985 and 1986, probably contributed to the bloom.
The diversity index (DI) for phytoplankton species identified from all samples ranged from 0.11 to 3.99 at the dam (site 1) and from 0.18 to 4.02 near the inlet (site 2). The DI generally was greater at site 2 than at site 1.
Concentrations, in colonies per 100 milliliters, of total coliform bacteria ranged from less than 2 to 1,100; concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria ranged from less than 2 to 380; and concentrations of fecal strepto cocci bacteria ranged from less than 3 to 960. Bacteria concentrations were greatest at site 2 during high runoff, and concentrations generally decreased from site 2 to site 1. The FC/FS ratios were less than 2.0 and generally were less than 1.0. Sources of bacteria in the reservoir most likely were indige nous to the basin and not from nearby human origins.
Annual suspended-sediment loads at site 3, during water years 1983-87, ranged from 391,000 to 1,570,000 tons. Bedload was less than 1.2 percent of suspended-sediment load in 18 measurements throughout a range (599-6,090 ft3/s) of water discharge. Because bedload was small, it was not considered a sub stantial part of the annual sediment load.
Size composition of 20 samples of suspended sediment averaged 25 percent clay, 46 percent silt, and 29 percent sand. Changes in percent composition of suspended sediment seemed to be independent of changes in sediment concentra tion, water discharge, and sediment load. Bedload was mostly sand (average bedload was about 86 percent sand and about 13 percent gravel), and the percent composition also seemed to be independent of water discharge and sediment load.
62
Sediment retention in Kenney Reservoir was estimated by using three methods. Data indicated that about 91 to about 98 percent of the total sediment load to the reservoir was retained since filling of the reservoir was completed in late 1984. Calculations of volume displacement in Kenney Reservoir, based on sediment load and size composition, and sediment retention comparisons with independent methods were summarized. Data collected during 1985-87 indicated that about 1.8 to 5 percent of the original capacity of the reservoir was displaced each year by sediment deposition. Data collected during 1973-87, however, indicated that the annual displacement could range from 0.5 to 7 percent each year. Variables such as sediment discharges from local tributary basins and sediment scour and discharge from the bottom of the reservoir were not measured.
Comparisons of water-quality data for the White River (site 3) with water impounded in Kenney Reservoir (sites 1 and 2) indicated:
1. Water releases at depth from the reservoir during summer generally would be several degrees cooler when compared with daytime maximum temperatures in the White River (site 3).
2. Differences between sites in values of specific conductance and concen trations of dissolved solids, major ions, and trace constituents were minor or insignificant. Changes in values for these chemical character istics principally were related to changes in streamflow.
3. Values of pH and dissolved oxygen were substantially less at depth during summer when compared with values measured near the reservoir surface and in the White River. Large values of pH and dissolved oxygen that were generated from photosynthesis in near-surface water in Kenney Reservoir were greater than values measured in the White River at site 3. Recur rences of these values in the reservoir during summer are probable.
4. Residence time was sufficient for most suspended matter to settle; therefore, substantial increases in water clarity of the White River between sites 3 and site 1 occurred during impoundment.
5. Decreases in concentrations of nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen and phosphorus, probably as a result of biological uptake, occurred, and there were apparent gradual increases in concentrations of ammonia as nitrogen at depth during summer from respiration.
6. Suspended solids tend to adsorb organics as they settle; therefore,concentrations of bacteria and other related organics, such as organic nitrogen, were decreased in the water column as water flowed through the reservoir.
7. Phytoplankton blooms and the effects of the blooms on water quality within the reservoir were substantial. Major phytoplankton blooms probably will occur when there are associated increases in residence time, water clarity, and water temperature and possibly when large concentrations of nutrients exist during periods of decreased inflow.
8. Sediment transport by the White River upstream from the reservoir was decreased approximately 91 percent or greater after filling of Kenney Reservoir. The long-term effects of sediment removal and storage on the White River downstream from Kenney Reservoir were not assessed.
63
SELECTED REFERENCES
Alien, H.L., 1972, Phytoplankton photosynthesis, micronutrient interactions, and inorganic carbon availability in a soft-water Vermont lake- Proceedings of the symposium on nutrients and eutrophication: American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, v. 1, p. 63-83.
Boyle, J.M., Covay, K.J., and Bauer, D.P., 1984, Quantity and quality ofstreamflow in the White River basin, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4022, 84 p.
Britton, L.J., Averett, R.C., and Ferreira, R.F., 1975, An introduction to the processes, problems, and management of urban lakes: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 601-K, 22 p. (Reprinted 1977).
Britton, L.J., and Greeson, P.E., eds., 1989, Methods for collection and analysis of aquatic biological and microbiological samples: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, bk. 5, chap. A4, 363 p.
Brown, Eugene, Skougstad, M.W., and Fishman, M.J., 1970, Methods for collec tion and analysis of water samples for dissolved minerals and gases: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, bk. 5, chap. Al, 160 p. [Out of print; available only in U.S. Depository Libraries; this is the only version that contains field methods]
Brune, G.M., 1953, Trap efficiency of reservoirs: American Geophysical Union Transactions, v. 34, no. 3, p. 407-418.
Butler, D.L., 1986, Sediment transport in the Colorado River near DeBeque,Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4266, 30 p.
Churchill, M.A., 1948, Analysis and use of reservoir sedimentation data with discussion by L.C. Gottschalk: Federal Inter-Agency Sedimentation Conference, Denver, Colo., 1947, Proceedings, p. 139-140.
Colby, B.R., 1956, Relationship of sediment discharge to streamflow: U.S. Geological Survey open-file report, 170 p.
___1963, Fluvial sediments a summary of source, transportation, deposition, and measurement of sediment discharge: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1181-A, 47 p.
Colorado Department of Health, 1978, Water quality standards for Colorado: Denver, Water Quality Control Division, 47 p.
Dunst, R.C., Born, S.M., Uttormark, P.O., Smith, S.A., and others, 1974, Survey of lake rehabilitation techniques and experiences: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin no. 75, 179 p.
Durfor, C.N., and Becker, Edith, 1964, Public water supplies of the 100 largest cities in the United States, 1962: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1812, 364 p.
Elliott, J.G., and DeFeyter, K.L., 1986, Sediment-data sources and estimated annual suspended-sediment loads of rivers and streams in Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4344, 148 p.
Emmett, W.W., 1980, A field calibration of the sediment-trapping character istics of the Helley-Smith bedload sampler: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1139, 44 p.
Federal Water Quality Administration, 1971, Current practice in watermicrobiology: Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Interior Training Manual, var. pag.
Ferguson, R.I., 1986, River loads underestimated by rating curves: Water Resources Research, v. 22, no. 1, p. 74-76.
64
Fishman, M. J. , and Friedman, L.C., eds., 1985, Methods for determination ofinorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments: U.S. GeologicalSurvey Open-File Report 85-495, 709 p. [Pending publication as U.S.Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, bk. 5,chap. Al].
Goerlitz, D.F. and Brown, Eugene, 1972, Methods for analysis of organicsubstances in water: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water- Resources Investigations, bk. 5, chap. A3, 40 p.
Greeson, P.E., 1971, Limnology of Oneida Lake with emphasis on factorscontributing to algae blooms: U.S. Geological Survey open-file report,185 p.
_____ed., 1982, Biota and biological principles of the aquatic environment:U.S. Geological Survey Circular 858-A, 49 p.
Guy, H.P., 1969, Laboratory theory and methods for sediment analysis: U.S.Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, bk. 5,chap. Cl, 58 p.
______1970a, Fluvial sediment concepts: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques ofWater-Resources Investigations, bk. 3, chap. Cl, 55 p.
____1970b, Sediment problems in urban areas: U.S. Geological Survey Circular601-E, 8 p.
Guy, H.P., and Norman, V.W., 1970, Field methods for measurement of fluvialsediment: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-ResourcesInvestigations, bk. 3, chap. C2, 59 p.
Hem, J.D., 1985, Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics ofnatural water (3d ed.): U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254,263 p.
Hutchinson, G.E., 1957, A treatise on limnology--Volume I, Geography, physicsand chemistry: New York, John Wiley, 1,015 p.
___1967, A treatise on limnology--Volume II, Introduction to the lakebiology and the limnoplankton: New York, John Wiley, 1,115 p.
Hutchison, N.E., Compiler, 1975 WATSTORE users guide, volume 1: U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 75-426, 708 p.
McKee, J.E., and Wolf, H.W., 1963, Water quality criteria (2d ed): CaliforniaWater Resources Control Board Publication no. 3-A, 548 p. (Reprinted in1971).
National Academy of Sciences, 1972, Water quality criteria, 1972: Washington,B.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, Ecological Research Series,EPA-R3-73-033-March 1973, 594 p.
Odum, E.P., 1971, Fundamentals of ecology (3d ed): Philadelphia, W.B. SaundersCo., 574 p.
Palmer, C.M., 1977, Algae and water pollution: Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency EPA-60019-77-036, 123 p.
Patrick, Ruth, and Reimer, C.W., 1966, Diatoms of the United States:Philadelphia, Academy of Natural Sciences, v. 1, no. 13, 688 p.
Piper, A.M., Garrett, A.A., and others, 1953, Native and contaminated groundwaters in the Long Beach-Santa Ana area, California: U.S. GeologicalSurvey Water-Supply Paper 1136, 320 p.
Prescott, G.W., 1939, Some relationships of phytoplankton to limnology andaquatic biology, in Problems of lake biology: American Association forthe Advancement of Science Publication no. 10, p. 65-78.
____1970, How to know the freshwater algae: Dubuque, Wm. C. Brown Co.,348 p.
65
Rudolfs, Willem and Heukelekian, H., 1967, Effect of sunlight and greenorganisms on re-aeration of streams, in Biology of Water Pollution: U.S.Department of Interior, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration,290 p.
Sawyer, C.N., 1947, Fertilization of lakes by agricultural and urban drainage:Journal of the New England Water Works Association, v. 61, no. 2,p. 109-127.
Strand, R.I. and Pemberton, E.L., 1982, Reservoir sedimentation Technicalguideline for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation: Denver, Sedimentation andRiver Hydraulics Section, Hydrology Branch, Division of PlanningTechnical Services, Engineering and Research Center, 48 p.
U.S. Geological Survey, 1978-86, Dolores River basin, Green River basin, andSan Juan River basin in Water resources data Colorado, Water years1977-85: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Reports CO-78-3 throughCO-86-3, v. 3, 9 v.
___1987-88, Colorado River basin in Water resources data--Colorado, Wateryears 1986-87: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Reports CO-87-2 throughCO-88-2, v. 2, 2 v.
Van Liew, W.P. and Gesink, M.L., 1985, Preliminary assessment of the ground- water resources of the alluvial aquifer, White River Valley, Rio BlancoCounty, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources InvestigationsReport 84-4307, 82 p.
Verduin, Jacob, 1956, Primary production in lakes: Limnology andOceanography, v. 1, no. 2, p. 85-91.
Vollenweider, R.A., 1968, Scientific fundamentals of the eutrophication oflakes and flowing water with particular reference to nitrogen andphosphorus as factors in eutrophication: Paris, France, Organization forEconomic Cooperation and Development, 252 p.
Warren, C.E., Doudoroff, Peter, and Shumway, D.L., 1973, Development ofdissolved oxygen criteria for freshwater fish: Washington, D.C., U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, 121 p.
Welch, E.B., 1969, Factors initiating phytoplankton blooms and resultingeffects on dissolved oxygen in Duwamish River estuary, Seattle, Wash.:U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1873-A, 62 p.
Wetzel, R.G., 1983, Limnology (2d ed.); Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co.,767 p.
Wilhm, J.L., and Dorris, T.C., 1968, Biological parameters for water qualitycriteria: Biological Science, v. 18, no. 6, p. 477-480.
Yoshimura, S., 1938, Dissolved oxygen of the lake waters of Japan:in section C of Science Reports [series]: Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku, [nowTokyo Kyoiku Daigaku], v. 2, no. 8, p. 63-277.
66
HYDROLOGIC DATA
67
Table II.--Water-quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir,site 1, water years 1985-87
[ft, feet; °C, degrees Celsius; pS/cm, microSiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; mg/L, milligrams per liter]
Date
01/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/8501/16/85
04/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/85
06/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/85
Time (hours)
142014301440144514471450145515001505151015151520152515301535
101510201025103010351040104510501055110011051110
1245125012551300130513101315132013251330133513401345
Sample depth (ft)
024678
101520253035404547
0247
1015202530354045
0247
101520253035404549
Temper ature (°C)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.75.1
8.08.08.08.08.07.87.87.87.77.67.57.0
17.515.814.013.813.513.513.113.012.511.111.010.910.8
Specific conduct
ance (MS/cm)
741741741745745745749756760779790832905972
1,550
739739733733733735735735740736736770
448453457452456453452450444433427430447
PH (units)
8.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.18.07.4
8.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.4
8.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.3
Oxygen, dissolved (mg/L)
9.69.69.59.59.49.49.49.59.59.39.18.97.55.30.0
9.09.09.08.98.98.98.98.98.98.98.88.8
8.08.18.38.38.38.38.38.38.48.58.58.47.9
Oxygen, dissolved saturation (percent)
79797979787878797977757462460
939393929291919191919089
1011009898979796969594949387
68
Table 11.--Water"quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir, site 1, water years 1985-87- -Continued
Date
06/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/85
07/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/85
08/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/85
08/28/8508/28/8508/28/8508/28/8508/28/8508/28/85
Time (hours)
131013151320132513301335134013451350135514001405
123012351240124512501255130013051310131513201325
123012351240124512501255130013051310131513201325
121012151220122512301235
Sample depth (ft)
0247
1015202530354043
0247
1015202530354045
0247
1015202530354045
0247
1015
Temper ature (°C)
18.816.816.816.516.415.515.014.514.214.114.013.8
23.823.823.423.123.022.922.721.521.120.820.519.3
22.522.021.821.621.521.420.920.020.019.619.218.5
21.020.820.320.120.020.0
Specific conduct
ance (MS/cm)
431434434436436471484496498500500505
660660655655649648648689698694698693
699704705706704704706713708712713718
760760766768766761
PH (units)
8.48.48.48.48.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.3
8.68.68.68.68.68.68.68.58.58.58.58.4
8.58.58.58.58.58.58.48.48.48.48.38.2
8.48.48.48.48.48.4
Oxygen, dissolved (mg/L)
8.27.87.87.87.67.67.67.77.77.87.87.8
9.08.98.98.98.98.58.47.66.96.86.86.8
9.49.59.59.59.39.18.57.67.27.06.85.4
8.07.97.98.08.07.9
Oxygen, dissolved saturation (percent)
1079898979593929292939292
13012912812712712111910595939290
13313313213212912611610297939070
110108107108107106
69
Table 11. Water-quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir, site 1, water years 1985-87 Continued
Date
08/28/8508/28/8508/28/8508/28/8508/28/8508/28/85
09/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/85
09/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/85
10/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/85
Time (hours)
124012451250125513001305
1100110511101115112011251130113511401145115011551200
1130113511401145115011551200120512101215122012251230
123012351240124512501255130013051309131213151320
Sample depth (ft)
202530354042
0247
101520253035404345
0247
101520253035404245
0247
1015202530354043
Temper ature(°c)
20.019.018.818.318.118.0
19.119.119.119.019.019.019.019.018.918.118.017.917.9
16.116.116.116.116.016.016.014.814.514.213.813.613.6
8.68.58.58.58.48.28.08.08.08.08.08.0
Specific conduct
ance (MS/cm)
755768772797803803
835835837837837841841841841902918932932
899899899899895895895906915913917920920
816820823823821825828828828828828820
pH (units)
8.48.38.28.28.28.2
8.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.28.18.18.17.8
8.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.38.28.27.7
8.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.47.9
Oxygen, dissolved (mg/L)
7.85.34.85.15.24.8
6.66.66.56.66.66.66.66.66.34.03.63.62.3
8.18.18.18.08.08.08.07.17.17.17.06.93.7
9.49.49.59.59.59.49.49.39.39.39.36.0
Oxygen , dissolved saturation (percent)
1057063666762
87878687878787878352464630
10010010099999999868584828143
989899999998979696969662
70
Table 11. --Water-quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir, site l f water years 1985-87--Continued
Date
04/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/86
06/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/86
06/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/86
07/22/8607/22/8607/22/8607/22/8607/22/8607/22/86
Time (hours)
122012251230123512401245125012551300130513101315
114011451150115512001205121012151220122512301235
111511201125113011351140114511501155120012051210
105010551100110511101115
Sample depth (ft)
0247
1015202530354043
0247
1015202530354045
0247
1015202530354045
0247
1015
Temper ature (°C)
12.012.012.011.811.511.010.610.09.59.09.08.5
16.514.714.514.414.314.114.013.313.012.712.312.0
17.817.317.116.916.616.516.416.215.014.514.013.9
21.021.021.020.620.520.4
Specific conduct
ance (MS/cm)
865865865865867871876874881876870876
378374378379380382382384384385403410
390391392389387388389389384388391398
596596596595593593
pH (units)
8.58.58.58.58.58.58.58.58.58.58.48.4
8.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.2
8.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.28.1
8.58.58.58.58.58.5
Oxygen, dissolved (mg/L)
9.49.49.49.49.49.49.49.49.59.49.49.3
8.28.28.28.28.28.28.18.08.07.97.67.4
8.08.08.08.08.08.08.07.97.97.87.67.4
8.48.48.48.58.38.3
Oxygen, dissolved saturation (percent)
10610610610610510410310210210010097
1029998989897969393918784
1031021011011001001009896939087
115115115115112112
71
Table II, Water-quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir/ site l t water years 1985-87--Continued
Date
07/22/8607/22/8607/22/8607/22/8607/22/8607/22/86
08/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/8608/20/86
09/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/86
06/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/8706/19/87
Time (hours)
112011251130113511401145
122012251230123512401245125012551300130513101315
113511401145115011551200120512101215122012251230
132013251330133513401345135013551400140514101415
Sample depth (ft)
202530354045
0247
1015202530354042
0247
1015202530354043
0247
1015202530354045
Temper ature (°C)
20.019.519.019.018.818.5
22.022.022.022.022.022.022.021.020.019.219.018.9
16.316.316.116.116.016.016.016.015.915.815.115.1
20.019.618.718.618.518.518.316.515.815.515.014.0
Specific conduct
ance (pS/cm)
626632635635636636
740740740740740736736734744756757757
790790799799793793793793793782791791
511511509505506506503497495493496531
pH (units)
8.48.38.38.38.38.3
8.58.58.58.58.58.58.58.48.48.38.28.2
8.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.4
8.88.88.88.88.88.88.88.28.07.97.97.8
Oxygen , dissolved (mg/L)
8.37.06.96.96.96.7
8.38.48.38.38.38.38.37.16.15.14.44.0
7.67.67.67.57.57.47.57.87.57.57.67.6
8.99.19.39.18.68.58.25.04.64.54.53.6
Oxygen , dissolved saturation (percent)
1119391919087
1161171161161161161169782675853
949494939391939692929292
1191201211181121101066256555442
72
Table 11. --Water-quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir, site l f water years 1985-87--Continued
Date
07/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/8707/15/87
08/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/8708/13/87
09/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/8709/03/87
Time (hours)
145515001505151015151520152515301535154015451550
143014351440144514501455150015051510151515201525
121012151220122512301235124012451250125513001305
Sample depth (ft)
0247
1015202530354045
0247
1015202530354045
0247
1015202530354045
Temper ature(°c)
22.121.521.020.820.420.119.819.119.018.618.217.9
21.621.721.521.521.221.121.121.121.020.320.019.6
19.819.519.219.018.818.718.618.517.817.017.016.8
Specific conduct
ance (MS/cm)
759753758753754759747757757752758770
826826830830828828828828832825826829
814824814809810806809809813826817825
pH (units)
8.68.58.58.58.58.58.48.38.38.38.28.2
8.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.48.28.18.0
8.48.48.48.58.48.58.48.48.38.28.28.1
Oxygen, dissolved (mg/L)
7.67.67.87.77.37.15.84.94.44.03.93.4
6.96.96.86.86.96.96.96.96.84.33.52.5
7.97.98.08.28.28.28.18.06.05.55.04.0
Oxygen , dissolved saturation (percent)
1061041071049995776458525044
969694949595959593584733
10510410510610610610410277706350
73
Table 12.--Water-quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir,site 2, water years 1985-87
[ft, feet; °C, degrees Celsius; pS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter;mg/L, milligrams per liter]
Date
04/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/8504/24/85
06/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/8506/04/85
06/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/8506/27/85
07/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/8507/19/85
08/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/8508/07/85
08/28/8508/28/8508/28/8508/28/8508/28/85
09/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/8509/06/85
Time (hours)
115512001205121012151225
14301435144014451450
144014451450145515001505
13551400140514101415
13501355140014051410
14301435144014451450
12151220122512301235
Sample depth (ft)
0247
1014
02468
0247
1013
02479
02478
02479
02479
Temper ature(°c)
8.48.28.07.97.97.9
14.814.414.114.114.1
15.014.814.514.213.812.8
24.423.021.720.520.5
22.522.321.820.120.0
21.821.821.820.020.0
19.219.119.018.915.2
Specific conduct
ance (pS/cm)
847849849843840843
452456460460457
533535534531528529
685709722730730
697700699706708
848848848877877
907907907895923
pH (units)
8.48.48.48.48.48.5
8.38.38.38.38.3
8.48.48.48.48.48.4
8.68.68.68.68.6
8.58.58.48.48.3
8.58.48.48.48.5
8.58.58.58.58.4
Oxygen, dissolved (mg/L)
9.89.79.79.79.79.6
8.18.18.28.28.2
8.48.58.58.58.68.4
9.39.29.39.39.0
8.68.68.58.58.2
8.28.28.18.58.5
8.18.18.17.97.7
Oxygen, dissolved saturation (percent)
10210110010010099
9896969696
10210210210110197
136131129126122
121121118114110
114114113114114
10710710710494
74
Table 12. Water-quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir, site 2, water years 1985-87--Continued
Date
09/17/8509/17/8509/17/8509/17/85
10/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/8510/21/85
04/24/8604/24/8604/24/8604/24/86
06/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/8606/03/86
06/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/8606/24/86
07/22/8607/22/8607/22/8607/22/8607/22/86
08/20/8608/20/8608/20/86
09/16/8609/16/8609/16/8609/16/86
Time (hours)
1255130013051310
140014051410141514201425
1330133513401345
13051310131513201325
12401245125012551300
12151220122512301235
140014051410
1300130513101315
Sample depth (ft)
0247
0247
1013
0247
02478
0247
10
0247
10
024
0247
Temper ature (°C)
15.015.015.015.0
8.58.58.58.58.18.1
11.811.811.811.8
17.617.015.015.014.9
16.116.016.016.016.0
20.620.620.320.019.0
22.222.222.2
15.015.015.015.0
Specific conduct ance
(jjS/cm)
868868868868
794794788788796796
721718718718
390389392387385
404402402402402
641641642644637
736736736
794794794794
pH (units)
8.38.38.38.3
8.58.58.58.58.48.4
8.48.48.48.4
8.28.28.28.28.2
8.38.38.38.38.3
8.58.58.58.58.5
8.48.48.4
8.58.58.58.5
Oxygen, dissolved (mg/L)
8.07.97.98.0
10.010.010.110.19.89.4
9.08.98.98.9
7.87.87.97.97.8
8.18.18.08.08.0
7.97.97.97.97.8
7.27.37.3
8.78.78.88.8
Oxygen, dissolved saturation (percent)
97969697
10410410610610197
101100100100
10098969694
100100999999
107107107106103
101102102
105105106106
75
Table 12.--Water-quality data for selected depths in Kenney Reservoir, site 2, water years 1985-87--Continued
Time Sample Temper- Date /v""'"" \ depth ature
(hours) * (o C )
Specific conduct
ance (pS/cm)
PH (units)
Oxygen,dissolved(mg/L)
07/15/87 07/15/87 07/15/87
08/13/87 08/13/87 08/13/87
09/03/87 09/03/87 09/03/87
132513301335
131513201325
110011051110
23.022.822.0
18.518.018.0
20.219.017.3
788792806
809805805
814814807
8.4 8.4 8.4
8.4 8.48.4
8.58.4 8.4
6.9 7.1 7.3
7.0 6.5 6.4
7.4 7.1 6.6
Oxygen, dissolved saturation (percent)
06/19/8706/19/8706/19/87
114511551205
024
18.017.817.8
575582582
8.68.68.6
8.08.08.0
103103103
97100101
918382
1009284
76
Table 13. Selected water-quality data for near-surface and near-bottom depths in Kenney Reservoir, site 1, water years 1985-87
[ft, feet; BOD, biochemical oxygen demand; mg/L, milligrams per liter; mm of HG, millimeters of mercury; in., inches; NTU, nephelometric turbidity units; °C, degrees Celsius; col/100 mL, colonies per 100 milliliters; <, less than; >, greater than; , no data]
Date (day)
01/16/8501/16/85
04/24/8504/24/85
06/04/8506/04/85
06/27/8506/27/85
07/19/8507/19/85
08/07/8508/07/85
08/28/8508/28/85
09/06/8509/06/85
09/17/8509/17/85
10/21/8510/21/85
04/24/8604/24/86
06/03/8606/03/86
06/24/8606/24/86
07/22/8607/22/86
08/20/8608/20/86
09/16/8609/16/86
06/19/8706/19/87
07/15/8707/15/87
08/13/8708/13/87
09/03/8709/03/87
Sample Time depth
(ft)
14301535
10201110
12501340
13151405
12351325
12351325
12151305
11051155
11351225
12351315
12251310
11451230
11201205
10551140
12251310
11401225
13251415
15001550
14351525
12151305
247
245
245
243
245
245
242
243
242
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
245
245
245
245
BOD, 5-day (mg/L)
1.02.0
1.42.3
1.51.1
1.21.1
1.21.1
1.71.4
.91.3--
1.11.2
1.41.5
.9
.9
1.2.7
1.0.8
1.31.1
1.31.2
.9
.8
.81.2
1.31.0
1.41.2
1.71.3
BOD, 20-day (mg/L)
4.6
3.24.9
3.02.5
2.83.0
3.03.1
3.52.6
2.24.0
2.63.0
3.43.3
2.42.3
3.32.9
2.82.5
3.22.4
3.03.0
2.22.0
1.93.0
2.92.9
3.23.2
3.13.0
Baro metric pres sure (mm of HG)
630
627--
625
635--
625--
628--
629
626--
621--
623
623--
625--
628--
629--
630
625--
625
625
623
626--
Trans par ency,
Secchi disk (in.)
_-
17--
13
20--
70--
41--
144
126
96--
32
29
11
13
70--
37
35--
47
66
66--
46--
Solids, Tur- residue bid- at ity 105 °C, (NTU) suspended
(mg/L)
3.522.0
13.014.0
23.023.0
13.025.0
2.69.2
7.613.0
1.212.0
2.07.6
2.05.6
8.08.0
8.07.5
45.040.0
23.025.0
3.018.0
11.021.0
8.222.0
4.720.0
3.57.3
4.09.5
5.218.0
--
3139
21186
2137
38
1623
113
36
1011
58
6139
3535
550
825
923
317
913
12
418
Coliform bac teria , total (col/
100 mL)
<2<3
>250480
>70160
250750
536
<4<4
200550
42120
1515
1010
160160
10050
580
<45
325
--
----
----
----
Coliform bac
teria, fecal (col/
100 mL)
<2<3
250320
60100
6260
<423
<4<4
<4<4
----
<4<4
33
<5<5
14060
4545
<423
<4<4
<43
----
--
----
----
Strepto cocci
bacteria, fecal (col/
100 mL)
147<3
170360
9084
64680
<4260
84
832
----
1040
3740
550
190180
55120
<484
<45
1024
----
----
--
----
77
Table 14. Selected water-quality data for near-surface and near-bottom depths in Kenney Reservoir, site 2, water years 1985-87
[ft, feet; BOD, biochemical oxygen demand; mg/L, milligrams per liter; mm of HG, millimeters of mercury; in., inches; NTU, nephelometric turbidity units; °C, degrees Celsius; col/100 ml, colonies per 100 milliliters; <, less than; >, greater than; , no data]
Date (day)
04/24/85 04/24/85
06/04/85 06/04/85
06/27/85 06/27/85
07/19/85 07/19/85
08/07/85 08/07/85
08/28/85 08/28/85
09/06/85 09/06/85
09/17/85 09/17/85
10/21/85 10/21/85
04/24/86 04/24/86
06/03/86 06/03/86
06/24/86 06/24/86
07/22/86 07/22/86
08/20/86
09/16/86 09/16/86
06/19/87
07/15/87
08/13/87
09/03/87
Sample Time depth
(ft)
1200 1225
1435 1450
1445 1505
1400 1415
1355 1405
1435 1450
1220 1235
1300 1310
1405 1420
1335 1345
1310 1320
1245 1300
1220 1235
1405
1305 1315
1155
1330
1320
1105
2 14
2 8
2 13
2 9
2 7
2 9
2 9
2 7
2 10
27
2 7
210
2 10
2
2 7
2
2
2
2
BOD, 5-day (mg/L)
0.9 1.2
1.1 1.6
1.4 1.6
1.4 1.4
1.3 1.3
1.3 1.1
--
1.2 1.5
1.2 1.2
1.8 2.3
.8
.8
.8
.8
1.1 1.3
1.3
1.0 1.0
.8
1.3
1.4
1.3
BOD, 20-day (mg/L)
2.7 3.3
3.2 3.6
3.4 4.2
3.3 3.4
2.3 2.4
2.9 2.6
--
3.0 3.1
3.0 2.8
4.2 5.3
2.3 2.7
1.8 2.0
2.6 2.9
3.3
2.5 2.8
1.9
3.2
3.7
3.0
Baro metric pres sure (mm of HG)
627
625
625
625
628
629
626
621
623
623
625
628
629
630
625
625
625
623
626
Trans par ency,
Secchi disk (in.)
7
6
10
37
25
46
25
12
10
2
6
11
17
6
14
19
17
9
12
Solids , Tur- residue bid- at ity 105 °C,
(NTU) suspended (mg/L)
80.0 250
100 120
50 55
7.4 22
1215
6.0 12.0
12 60
40 36
30 23
220 200
70 80
40 50
18 55
95
28 21
14
15
48
30
165 778
103 276
86 114
1 154
15 27
6 9
--
46 53
73 40
494 624
144
86 130
22 115
96
46 66
21
15
58
36
Coliform bac teria, total (col/
100 mL)
400 >200
>320 >240
400 1,100
55 130
40 47
200 150
440 360
50 50
800
150 400
200 120
15 250
27
14 20
--
--
--
--
Coliform bac teria , fecal (col/
100 mL)
100 140
320 >60
290 380
7 80
<4 23
4 3
--
130 120
33 3
20
100 220
150 100
6 52
21
12 16
--
--
--
--
Strepto cocci
bacteria, fecal (col/
100 mL)
280 440
190 230
720 >920
40 210
8 80
23 230
--
460 420
70 87
960
170 220
200 190
44 260
33
52 52
--
--
--
--
78
Table 15. Ta
xa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankton at
sites
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7
[Cel
ls,
cell
numbers
per
mill
ilit
er;
ft,
feet
; % Co
mp,
perc
ent
composition; mg/L,
milligrams pe
r liter;
|jg/
L, mi
crog
rams
per
lite
r; --,
no da
ta.
All
cell
nu
mber
s, subtotals, and
totals ar
e rounded
to two
sign
ific
ant
figu
res
(Bri
tton
and
Greeson, 1989), therefore, percentage totals do not
always equal
100]
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-
ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) 31
11
.9
28
CENTRALES
0 0.0
0 Cy
clot
ella
bod
anic
a Cyclotella k
utzingiana
Cyclotella meneghiniana
Cyclotella ps
eudo
stel
lige
ra
Cyclotella st
elli
gera
Me
losi
ra gr
anul
ata
var.
an
gust
issi
ma
Melo
sira
it
alic
a Me
losi
ra li
rata
Me
losi
ra sp.
Rhizosolenia eriensis
Stephanodiscus alpinus
Stephanodiscus astrea
Stephanodiscus ni
agar
ae
Stephanodiscus tenuis
Stephanodiscus sp.
PENN
ALES
31
11
.9
28
Achnanthes affinis
Achn
anthes
lanceolata
Achn
anthes
minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
vene
ta
Amphora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
formosa
14
5.4
Cocconeis
placentula
Janu
ary
16,
1985
14.7
0.0
14.7
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankt
on at
sites
I an
d 2
in Kenney
Rese
rvoi
r, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-S
7--C
onti
nued
PHYL
UM
ORDER
Genus
species
Kenney R
eser
voir
(site
1)Kenney R
eser
voir
(s
ite
2)2-
ft
dept
hComposite
(0-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% C
omp
00 o
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS) Continued
PENN
ALES
--Continued
Cyli
ndro
thec
a gracilis
Cyli
ndro
thec
a sp.
Cyma
topl
eura
so
lea
Cy
mbel
la af
fini
s Cy
mbel
la m
inut
a Cy
mbel
la m
inuta
f. latens
Cymb
ella
min
uta
var.
silesica
Cy
mbel
la si
nuat
a Di
atom
a an
ceps
Diat
oma
hiemale
var.
me
sodo
n Diatoma
tenu
e va
r. elongation
Diat
oma
vulgare
Dipl
onei
s sp.
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Euno
tia
sp.
Frag
ilar
ia ca
puci
na
Frag
ilar
ia cr
oton
ensi
s Fr
agil
aria
pinnata
Frag
ilar
ia v
auch
eria
e Go
mpho
nema angustatum
Gyro
sigm
a sp
ence
rii
Hann
aea
arcus
Hann
aea
arcus
var.
amphioxys
Hann
aea
arcu
s va
r. arcus
Hantzsch
ia amphioxys
Meridion
circulare
Navi
cula
ar
vens
is
Navi
cula
ca
pita
ta
Navicula
cry
ptoc
epha
la
January
16,
1985
--Co
ntin
ued
1.6
3.7
Navi
cula
cryptocephala
var.
ve
neta
Navi
cula
ga
stru
mNavicula h
eufieri
Navi
cula
la
nceo
lata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
menisculus
var.
up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la m
inima
Navi
cula
min
uscu
laNa
vicu
la m
utica
Navi
cula
notha
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la p
upula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a va
r. teneJJa
Navi
cula
rhyncocephala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var.
intermedia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
aNa
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la vi
ridu
laNa
vicu
la viridula va
r. av
eame
00 HJ
Navi
cula
viridula v
ar.
aven
acea
Na
vicu
la sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a co
mmun
isNi
tzsc
hia
diss
ipat
a 3
1.2
1 0.5
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
1 2.
7 7
3.7
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ig
nora
ta
Nitz
schi
a in
term
edia
Ni
tzsc
hia
latens
Nitz
schi
a linearis
Nitzschia
long
issi
ma v
ar.
reversa
Nitz
schi
a mi
croc
epha
la
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
ea
Nitz
schi
a pusilla
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
7
2.7
3 1.6
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
lis
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la va
r. debilis
Tabl
e 15. Ta
xa,
numbers, an
d pe
rcen
t composition
of phytoplankton a
t sites
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-
ft
Comp
osit
e 2-ft
Comp
osit
edepth
(0-1
0 ft
) depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cell
s % Comp
Cells
% Comp
oo
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
PENNALES--
Continued
Nitz
schi
a sp.
Pleurosigma
delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curv
ata
Rhopalodia mu
scul
us
Suri
rell
a angustata
Suri
rell
a ov
alis
Su
rire
lla
ovata
Synedra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
Synedra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
a Snyedra
radiens
Synedra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
var.
familiaris
Sy
nedr
a ul
naSynedra
ulna v
ar.
cont
ract
a Sy
nedr
a ulna v
ar.
dani
ca
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. ox
yrhy
nchu
s Synedra
sp.
Thalassiosira
fluv
iati
lis
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
7 Ac
tina
stru
m hantzschii
Actinastrum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Ankistrodesmus co
nvol
utus
v.
acicularis
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus falcatus va
r. acicuJaris
Ankistrodesmus falcatus va
r. mi
rabi
lis
Janu
ary
16,
1985 Continued
2.7
3.7
0.0
Cart
eria
sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
7 2.7
Chlo
rell
a sp.
Chloroco
ccum hum
icol
aCh
loro
cocc
um sp.
Chlorogo
nium s
pirale
Chlorogo
nium sp
. --
Chod
atel
la q
uadr
iset
aClosteri
um s
p.Co
ccom
yxa
minor
Cruc
igen
ia qu
adra
taDictyosp
haer
ium
ehrenbergianum
Dictyosp
haer
ium pu
lche
llum
Dictyosp
haer
ium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nfci
nia
radiata
Gole
nkin
iops
is solitaria
Gonium sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a co
ntor
taMesotaen
ium
sp.
Wicratin
ium pusillum
Micratin
ium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocytis
sp.
Pand
orin
a mo
rum
Phacotus
le
ntic
ular
isPh
acot
us sp.
Plat
ymon
as sp.
Pter
omon
as sp.
Scen
edes
mus
anna
tus
Scen
edes
mus
biju
gaSc
ened
esmu
s di
morp
hus
Scen
edes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scen
edes
mus
serr
atus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schr
oede
ria
juda
yiSc
hroe
deri
a se
tige
raSelenast
rum mi
nutu
mSp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurast
rum
sp.
Treiubaria
sp.
--
Table 15. Ta
xa,
numbers, an
d pe
rcen
t composition
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
I an
d 2
in K
enne
i/ -
Rese
rvoi
r/ wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDE
RGenus
spec
ies
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-
ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
2-ft
de
pth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
oo
CHRYSOPHYTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGA
E)
Dinojbryon d
ivergens
Kephyrion
spir
ale
Keph
yrio
n sp.
Mallomonas acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Ma
llom
onas
sp.
Pleurosigma
deli
catu
lum
PI euros
igma sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYAN
OPHY
TA (B
LUE-
GREE
N ALGAE)
Ana&
aena
sp.
Aphanocapsa
deli
cati
ssim
a Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanoth
ece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
disp
ersu
s Ch
rooc
occu
s limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
ylococcopsis fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyng
bya
limnetica
Lyng
bya
nana
Marssoniella el
egan
s Oscillatoria an
gust
a Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Oscillatoria tenuis
Osci
llat
oria
sp.
0.0
January
16,
1985--Continued
0 0.0
8532
.712
063
.2
147.
4
8532
.7
Phor
midi
um sp.
--
--
110
57.9
Syne
choc
occu
s li
near
e Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
140
53.8
45
23.7
Chroomonas
sp.
85
32.7
10
5.3
Cryp
tomo
nas
erosa
Cryp
tomo
nas
mars
onii
Cryptomonas
ovat
a 14
5.
4 7
3.7
Cryptomonas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rati
form
isCr
ypto
mona
s sp
. 43
16.5
28
14.7
Rh
odomonas mi
nuta
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Eugl
ena
acus
Eugl
ena
viridis
Eugl
ena
sp.
Trac
helo
mona
s sp.
PYRR
HOPH
YTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Cera
tium
hir
undi
nell
a Gymnodiniu
m sp.
Peri
dini
um bic
eps
Peri
dini
um i
ncon
spic
ua
Peri
dini
um sp.
Tota
l cells
and
percent
comp
osit
ion
260
101
190
102
Numb
er of
sp
ecie
s 9
--
11Di
vers
ity
inde
x (D
I) at
sp
ecie
s level
2.41
--
2.24
Biomass
(mg/L
dry
weight)
<0.1
--
<0
.1
Chlo
roph
yll
a (M8/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
b (M
g/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
c (pg/L)
00
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numb
ers,
an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankt
on at si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Rese
rvoi
r, wa
ter
years
1985
-87-
-Con
tinu
ed
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenn
ey Res
ervo
ir (s
ite
1)2-
ft
dept
hCe
lls
% Co
mp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
depth
Cells
% Co
mp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
BACI
LLAR
IOPHYT
A (D
IATO
MS)
850
43.1
290
CENTRALES
740
37.6
200
Cycl
otel
la b
odan
ica
400
20.3
200
Cycl
otel
la k
utzi
ngia
na
Cycl
otel
la m
eneghiniana
Cycl
otella
pseudostelligera
Cycl
otel
la st
elli
gera
Me
losi
ra granulata
var.
an
gustissima
Melo
sira it
alic
a 160
8.1
Melo
sira li
rata
180
9.1
Melo
sira sp.
Rhiz
osolen
ia eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us al
pinu
s St
epha
nodi
scus
as
trea
St
epha
nodi
scus
ni
agar
ae
Step
hano
disc
us tenuis
Step
hanodiscus sp.
PENNALES
110
5.6
93
Achn
anthes
af
fini
s Ac
hnan
thes
lanceolata
Achn
anth
es mi
nuti
ssim
a Am
phor
a perpusilla
Amph
ora
vene
ta
Amph
ora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
fo
rmos
a --
--
11
Cocconeis
plac
entu
la
Cyli
ndroth
eca
gracilis
Cyli
ndro
thec
a sp.
Cyma
topl
eura
so
lea
Apri
l 24,
1985
35.4
24.4
24.4
11.3 1.3
840
16.5
0.0
560
66.7
0.0
8416.5
5666.7
00
Cymbella affinis
Cymbella mi
nuta
Cymbella mi
nuta
f.
la
tens
Cymbella mi
nuta
va
r. silesica
Cymbella si
nuat
aDiatoma
anceps
Diatoma
hiem
ale
var.
mesodon
Diatoma
tenu
e va
r. elongation
Diat
oma
vulg
are
Dipl
onei
s sp
.Ep
ithe
mia
sore
xEu
noti
a sp.
Frag
ilaria
ca
puci
naFragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pi
nnat
aFragilaria va
uche
riae
Gomphonema an
gust
atum
Gyro
sigma
spencerii
Hann
aea
arcu
sHa
nnae
a arcus
var. amphioxys
Hann
aea
arcus
var.
arcus
Hantzschia am
phio
xys
Meridion circulare
Navi
cula
arvensis
Navicula capitata
Navi
cula cryptocephala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
Navi
cula gastrum
Navi
cula
he
ufie
riNa
vicu
la lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
me
nisc
ulus
va
r. up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la minima
Navi
cula
mi
nusc
ula
Navi
cula mu
tica
Navi
cula
no
tha
Navi
cula
pe
llic
osa
Navi
cula
pup
ula
Navi
cula
radios a
Navi
cula ra
dios
a va
r. te
nell
a
285.
528
33.3
0.6
285.5
14
16.7 8.3
Tabl
e 15. Ta
xa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
species
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Comp
oo
oo
BACILLARIOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
PENNALES--
Continued
ffav
icul
a rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var.
in
termedia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
a Na
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
a Na
vicu
la v
irid
ula
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
me
Navi
cula
viridula
var.
av
enac
ea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a ac
icul
aris
Ni
tzsc
hia
comm
unis
Ni
tzsc
hia
diss
ipat
a Ni
tzsc
hia
filiformis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
Nitz
schi
a hantzschiana
Nitz
schi
a hungarica
Nitz
schi
a ig
nora
ta
Nitz
schi
a in
term
edia
Ni
tzsc
hia
Iatens
Nitz
schi
a linearis
Nitz
schi
a longissima v
ar.
reve
rsa
Nitz
schi
a mi
croc
epha
la
Nitz
schi
a palea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
ea
Nitz
schi
a pu
s ilia
Nitz
schi
a romana
Nitz
schi
a thermal is
Ni
tzsc
hia
tryb
lion
ella
var
. de
bili
s Ni
tzsc
hia
sp.
April
24,
1985
--Co
ntin
ued
28 141.4
0.7
140.7
28 28
1.4
1.4
11 11 11 11 11 11 11
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
285.
58.
3
00 VO
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curvata
Rhopalodia
musculus
Suri
rell
a angustata
Suri
rell
a ov
alis
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
aSn
yedr
a ra
dien
sSy
nedr
a ru
mpen
sSy
nedr
a ru
mpen
s va
r. familiaris
Synedra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna va
r. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna va
r. da
nica
Syne
dra
ulna va
r. ox
yrhy
nchu
sSy
nedr
a sp.
Thalassiosira
fluv
iati
lis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
Acti
nast
rum hantzschii
Acti
nast
rum
sp.
Anfc
istr
odes
mus
convolutus
Ankistrode
smus co
nvol
utus
v.
acicular
isAnkistrode
smus fa
lcat
us
Ankistrode
smus falcatus va
r.acicular
isAnkistrode
smus fa
lcat
us va
r. mi
rabi
lis
Cart
eria
sp
. Chlamydomonas
sp.
Chlo
rell
a sp.
Chlorococcum h
umic
ola
Chlorococcum sp
. Chlorogoni
um s
pira
le
Chlorogonium sp.
Chodatella qu
adri
seta
Closterium sp.
Cocc
omyx
a minor
Crucigenia quadrata
140.7
110
13.4
0.0
0.0
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numb
ers,
an
d percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, water
years
1985-87 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenn
ey Res
ervo
ir (s
ite
1)Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-
ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Comp
vo o
CHLOROPHYTA
(GRE
EN A
LGAE)--Continued
Dict
yosp
haer
ivm
ehre
nber
gian
vm
Dict
yosp
haer
ivm pu
lche
llum
Dictyospha
eriv
m sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nkinia
ra
diat
a Golenkiniopsis solitaria
Goni
um sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a contorta
Meso
taen
ium
sp.
Micr
atin
ium pu
s ilium
Micratinium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pand
orin
a morum
Phacotus lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Plat
ymon
as sp.
Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
arma
tus
Scen
edes
mus
bijuga
Scen
edes
mus
dimo
rphu
s Sc
ened
esmu
s quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edesmu
s sp
. Schroederia
judayi
Schroederia
setigera
Selenastrum minutum
Spha
eroc
ysti
s schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treu
Jbar
ia sp.
April
24,
1985
--Co
ntin
ued
140.7
110
13.4
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGA
E)
240
12.2
11
1.3
0 0.0
0 0.0
Dinobryon
divergens
Kephyrion
spir
ale
Keph
yrio
n sp.
230
11.7
11
1.3
Mallomonas ac
aroi
des
Mallomonas ak
roko
nos
Mallomonas gl
obos
aMallomonas sp.
14
0.7
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatulum
Pleu
rosi
gma
sp.
Ochr
omon
as sp.
CYAN
OPHY
TA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
610
31.0
300
36.6
430
84.3
28
33.3
AnaJ
baen
a sp
.Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanoth
ece
sp.
Chroococ
cus
dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
limn
etic
us
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dactylococcopsis fascicularis
43
2.2
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyng
bya
limnetica
Lyng
bya
nana
170
8.6
--
--
200
39.2
28
33
.3Marssoniella elegans
Oscillatoria an
gust
a Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
--
--
--
230
45.1
Osci
llat
oria
li
mnet
ica
Osci
llat
oria
te
nuis
Oscillatoria sp
. 400
20.3
300
36.6
Phormidium sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s li
near
eSy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mino
rSy
nech
ococ
cus
sp.
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
240
12.2
110
13.4
0
0.0
0 0.0
Chroomon
as sp.
14
0.7
Cryp
tomo
nas
erosa
Cryp
tomo
nas
mars
onii
Cr
ypto
mona
s ov
ata
Tabl
e 15. Ta
xa,
numb
ers,
and percent
comp
osit
ion
of p
hyto
plan
feto
n at
si
tes
1 and
2 in Kenney Reservoir, water y
ears
19
85-8
7--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)Ke
nney
Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
Cell
s % Comp
vo
ho
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRYPTOMONADS) Continued
Cryptomonas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rostratiformis
Cryptomonas
sp.
Rhodomonas mi
nuta
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)
Eugl
ena
acus
Eu
glen
a viridis
Euglena
sp.
Trachelomonas
sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DIN
OFLA
GELL
ATES
) Ceratium hir
undi
nell
a Gymnodinium
sp.
Peri
dini
um biceps
Peridini
um in
cons
picu
a Pe
ridi
nium sp.
Total
cell
s and
percent
composition
14 14
0.7
0.7
0.0
1,97
0 10
0
April
24,
1985
--Co
ntin
ued
230
11.7
110
13.4 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
820
100
510
101
0.0
0.0
84
100
Number of
spec
ies
Diversity
inde
x (DI) at sp
ecie
s level
Biomass
(mg/
L dry
weig
ht)
Chlorophyll
a (Mg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll b (M
g/L)
Chlorophyll
c (Mg/L)
173.
2514
2.60
51.74
52.08
June
4,
19
85
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
) 73
0 57.5
480
94.1
270
90.0
370
100.0
CENTRALES
590
46.5
210
41.2
57
19.0
57
15.4
Cycl
otel
la bo
dani
ca
Cycl
otel
la kutzingiana
Cyclotella me
negh
inia
na
14
1.1
14
2.7
Cyclotella ps
eudo
stel
lige
raCyclotella stelligera
330
26.0
200
39.2
57
19.0
57
15.4
Me
losi
ra granulata
var.
an
gust
issi
ma
Melo
sira
it
alic
a 230
18.1
Me
losi
ra lirata
Melo
sira
sp.
Rhizosolenia eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us alpinus
14
1.1
Step
hano
disc
us as
trea
St
epha
nodi
scus
ni
agar
ae
Step
hano
disc
us te
nuis
Stephanodiscus sp.
5
PENNALES
140
11.0
267
52.4
210
70.0
310
83.8
Achnanthes affinis
Achnanthes la
nceo
lata
Achnanthes minutissima
--
--
28
5.5
28
9.3
28
7.6
Amphora
perpusilla
Amph
ora
veneta
Amphora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
formosa
--
--
14
2.7
Cocconeis
placentula
Cyli
ndro
thec
a gracilis
Cyli
ndro
thec
a sp.
Cyma
topl
eura
so
lea
Cymb
ella
affinis
--
--
--
85
28.3
Cy
mbel
la mi
nuta
Cy
mbel
la m
inut
a f. latens
Cymb
ella
mi
nuta
va
r. si
lesi
ca
Cymb
ella
si
nuat
a Di
atom
a an
ceps
Diatoma
hiem
ale
var.
me
sodo
n Diatoma
tenue
var.
el
onga
tum
Tabl
e 15. Tax
a, numbers, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phytoplankton at
sites
1 an
d 2
in Ken
ney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 1 9
85-87- -Continued
PHYLUM
Genu
s species
Kenn
ey Res
ervo
ir (site
1)2-ft
Comp
osit
e de
pth
(0-10
ft)
Cell
s %
Comp
Cells
% C
omp
Kenney Res
ervo
ir (s
ite
2)2-ft
Comp
osit
e de
pth
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s %
Comp
Cells
% C
omp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) -Continued
PENNALES- -C
ontinued
Diat
oma
vulgare
Dipl
onei
s sp.
Epit
hemi
a sorex
Euno
tia
sp.
Fragilar
ia ca
puci
na
Fragilar
ia cr
oton
ensi
s Fragilar
ia pi
nnat
a Fragilaria vaucheriae
Gomphonema angustatum
Gyro
sigm
a spencerii
Hannaea
arcu
sHannaea
arcu
s va
r. amphioxys
Hannaea
arcus
var.
ar
cus
Hantzschia amphioxys
Meridion circulare
Navi
cula
ar
vens
is
Navi
cula
capitata
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
Na
vicu
la ga
stru
m Na
vicu
la heufleri
Navi
cula
lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
men
iscu
lus
var.
up
saliensis
Navi
cula
minima
Navi
cula
min
uscu
la
Navi
cula
mu
tica
Na
vicu
la n
otha
June
4
> 19
85 -Continued
287.
6
141.
128
5.5
Navi
cula
pe
llic
osa
Navi
cula
pup
ula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a va
r. te
nell
aNavicula rhyncocephala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var. intermedia
Navi
cula
tantula
Navicula tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la vi
ridu
laNa
vicu
la vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
me
--
--
14
2.7
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la va
r. avenacea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a comnunis
--
14
2.7
28
7.6
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
28
2.2
--
--
28
9.3
28
7.6
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
28
5.5
32
10.7
14
3.8
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
naNi
tzsc
hia
hung
aric
aNi
tzsc
hia
igno
rata
--
14
2.7
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
28
2.2
14
2.7
--
28
7.6
Nitz
schi
a la
tens
14
1.
1 14
2.7
Nitz
schi
a linearis
Nitz
schi
a longissima va
r. re
vers
aNi
tzsc
hia
microcephala
Nitz
schi
a palea
--
57
11.2
28
9.3
28
7.6
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNi
tzsc
hia pu
sill
aNi
tzsc
hia
romana
28
2.2
28
5.5
7 2.
3 14
3.8
Nitz
schi
a thermalis
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la va
r. de
bili
sNi
tzsc
hia
sp.
--
28
7.6
PIeurosigma
delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curvata
Rhopalodia
mus
culu
s
--
--
--
28
7.6
Suri
rell
a angustata
14
1.1
Suri
rell
a ov
alis
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
14
1.1
Synedra
acus
Synedra
delicatissima
Tabl
e 15. Ta
xa,
numb
ers,
and percent
comp
osit
ion
of p
hytoplanfcton
at si
tes
1 and
2 in
Ke
nney
Res
ervo
ir,
water years
1985
-87-
-Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)
Composite
Cells
2-ft
depth% Co
mp(0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)
2-ft
Composite
____depth
Cell
s % Comp
(0-1
0 ft
) Ce
lls
% Comp
10
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIATOMS) Continue
d PE
NNAL
ES--
Continued
Syne
dra
fasciculate
Syne
dra
minuscula
Snye
dra
radiens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
var.
fa
mili
aris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
dani
ca
Synedra
ulna
var
. ox
yrhy
nchu
s Sy
nedr
a sp.
Thal
assi
osir
a fluviatilis
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
Actinastru
m ha
ntzs
chii
Actinastru
m sp.
AnAr
istr
odesmus
convolutus
AnAr
istr
odes
mus
conv
olut
us v.
acicularis
AnAr
istr
odes
mus
falcatus
Anfe
istr
odes
mus
falc
atus
var
.acicularis
Anfe
istr
odes
mus
falcatus v
ar.
mira
Jbil
is
Cart
eria
sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
Chlo
rell
a sp.
Chlorococcum hum
icol
a Chlorococcum s
p.
Chlorogoni
um s
pirale
June
4, 1985 Continued
120
9.4
14 11
2.7
2.2
0.0
57
15.4
0.0
IO
Chlorogonium sp.
Chodatella qu
adri
seta
Closterium sp.
Cocc
omyx
a minor
Cruc
igen
ia quadrata
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
ehrenbergianum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium pu
lche
llum
Di
ctyo
spha
eriu
m sp.
Gloeocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nkin
ia radiata
Golenkiniopsis so
lita
ria
Gonium sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a contorta
Nesotaenium
sp.
Nicratinium
pus ilium
Nicratinium
sp.
Noug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pand
orin
a mo
rum
Phac
otus
le
ntic
ular
is
Phacotus sp.
Platymon
as sp.
Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
arma
tus
Scen
edes
mus
biju
ga
Scenedesmus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schroederia
judayi
Schroederia
setigera
Selenastrum minutum
Spha
eroc
ysti
s sc
hroe
teri
Staurastrum
sp.
TreuJbaria sp.
110
8.7
0.8
141.1
1.4
Tabl
e 15
.--T
a.xa
, numbers, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDE
RGe
nus
species
Kenney Res
ervo
ir (site
1)Kenney Res
ervo
ir (s
ite
2)2-
ft
depth
Composite
(0-10
ft)
2-ft
de
pth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% C
omp
Cell
s %
Comp
oo
CHRYSOPHYTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGA
E)
Dinofcryon
divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Nallomonas acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mall
omon
as globosa
Mallomonas sp.
Pleurosigma
de.Zicatu.Zmn
Pleurosi
gma
sp.
Ochromon
as sp.
CYANOPHYTA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGAE)
Anafcaena
sp.
Aphanocapsa
deli
cati
ssim
a Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chroococ
cus
dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
liin
neti
cus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yJoc
occo
psis
fa
scic
ular
is
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyng
jbya
li
inne
tica
Ly
ngby
a nana
Marssoniel-Za
eleg
ans
Osci
llat
oria
an
gust
a Os
cill
ator
ia angustissima
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
te
nuis
Os
cill
ator
ia sp.
141.
1
141.1
110
8.7
110
8.7
June
4, 1985--Continued
0 0.0
28
9.3
0.0
289.
3
0.0
0.0
0.0
Phor
midi
um sp
. Sy
nech
ococ
cus
line
are
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mino
r Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sp.
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)
300
23.6
14
2.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Chroomonas
sp.
140
11.0
Cr
ypto
mona
s er
osa
Cryp
tomo
nas
mars
onii
Cr
ypto
mona
s ovata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rati
form
isCr
ypto
mona
s sp.
160
12.6
14
2.7
Rhodomonas mi
nuta
EUGL
ENOP
HYTA
(E
UGLE
NOID
S)
0 0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 Euglena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
Trac
helo
mona
s sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DIN
OFLA
GELL
ATES
) 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 Ceratium hirundinella
Gymn
odin
ium
sp.
Peridinium bic
eps
Peri
dini
um in
cons
picu
a Pe
ridi
nium sp.
Tota
l ce
lls
and
percent
comp
osit
ion
Numb
er of
sp
ecies
Dive
rsit
y in
dex
(DI) at
species
level
Biom
ass
(mg/
L dr
y weight)
Chlorophyll
a (fJg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
b (M
8/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
c (p
g/L)
1,27
0 100
173.23 3.1
7.9
4.2
12.3
510
99
173.
24 2.6
8.6
1.7
7.7
300
99
82.
75 1.9 __ __
__
370 12
3.47 1.9 --
100 __ __ __ -- _
o
o
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Rese
rvoi
r, water
years
1985
-87-
-Con
tinued
PHYLUM
rVDTYPP
Genu
s species
BACILLARIOPHYTA (DIATOMS)
CENTRALES
Cycl
otel
la bodanica
Cycl
otel
la k
utzi
ngia
naCy
clot
ella
meneghiniana
Cycl
otel
la p
seudostelligera
Cycl
otel
la st
elli
gera
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-ft
depth
Cell
s
410
220 -- -- 140 __ 57
% Co
mp
23.8
12.8 -- __ 8.1
__ 3.3
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
1,92
01,
200
-- -- 510
-- 630
% Co
mp
June
52.2
32.6
-- __ 13.9 -- 17.1
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
depth
Cells
27,
1985
600
240 -- -- 170 -- 74
% Co
mp
54.5
21.8 -- -- 15.5 -- 6.7
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
370
110 -- -- 57 -- 28
% Co
mp
100.
029
.7 -- -- 15.4 -- 7.6
Melo
sira
gr
anul
ata
var.
Me
losi
ra it
alic
a Me
losi
ra li
rata
Me
losi
ra sp.
Rhiz
osol
enia
er
iens
is
Step
hano
disc
us al
pinu
s St
epha
nodi
scus
as
trea
St
epha
nodi
scus
nia
gara
e St
epha
nodi
scus
tenuis
Step
hano
disc
us sp.
PENNALES
Achn
anth
es af
fini
s Ac
hnan
thes
lanceolata
Achn
anth
es mi
nuti
ssim
a Am
phor
a perpusilla
Amph
ora
vene
ta
Amph
ora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
fo
rmos
a Cocconei
s pl
acen
tula
Cy
lind
roth
eca
gracilis
Cyli
ndro
thec
a sp.
Cyma
topl
eura
so
lea
angu
stissima
28 190
1.6
11.0
57 720
1.5
19.6
360
32.7
28
260 28
7.6
70.3 7.6
Cymb
ella
affinis
Cymb
ella
minuta
Cymb
ella
min
uta
f. la
tens
Cymb
ella
minuta
var.
si
lesi
caCymbella sinuata
Diat
oma
ance
psDi
atom
a hiemale
var.
me
sodo
nDi
atom
a te
nue
var.
elongation
Diatoma
vulg
are
Diploneis
sp.
Epit
hemi
a sorex
Eunotia
sp.
--
--
28
2.5
Fragilaria capucina
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pinnata
--
--
--
28
7.6
Fragilaria vaucheriae
Gomp
hone
ma angustatum
Gyrosigma
spencerii
Hannaea
arcus
Hannaea
arcus
var.
amphioxys
Hannaea
arcus
var.
arcus
Hantzschia
amphioxys
Meridion circulare
--
--
--
--
57
15.4
ffav
icul
a ar
vens
is
7 0.4
14
0.4
28
2.5
14
3.8
Navi
cula
capitata
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
--
--
45
1.2
--
--
57
15.4
Navi
cula
gastrum
Navi
cula
heu
fler
iNa
vicu
la la
nceo
lata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
1 0.
4 28
0.8
14
1.3
7 1.9
Wavi
cula
menisculus
var.
up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la m
inima
57
3.3
140
3.8
7 0.
6 14
3.8
Navi
cula
min
uscu
laNa
vicu
la m
utica
--
--
--
--
--7
Navi
cula
no
tha
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la pupula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a va
r. te
nell
a
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers/ an
d pe
rcen
t composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Ken
ney
Reservoir, wa
ter
years
1985-87 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Comp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Comp
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
depth
Cell
s % C
omp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Comp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) Co
ntin
ued
PENNALES--Continued
Navicula rhyncocephala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var.
in
term
edia
Navi
cula
tantula
Navi
cula
tr
ipun
ctat
a Na
vicu
la vi
ridu
la
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
me
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avenacea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a ac
icul
aris
Ni
tzsc
hia
comm
unis
Ni
tzsc
hia
diss
ipat
a Ni
tzsc
hia
filiformis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
Nitz
schi
a hantzschiana
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ig
nora
ta
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a linearis
Nitz
schi
a lo
ngis
sima
var.
reve
rsa
Nitz
schi
a microcephala
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
Nitz
schi
a paleacea
Nitz
schi
a pu
s il
ia
Nitz
schi
a romana
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
l is
Ni
tzsc
hia
tryb
lion
ella
var
. de
bili
s Ni
tzsc
hia
sp.
0.4
28 28
1.6
1.6
June 27,
1985--Continued
0.2
28 85 57 14 85 170 7 7
0.8
2.3
1.5
0.4
2.3
4.6
0.2
0.2
57 100 28 28 42
5.2
9.1
2.5
2.5
3.8
57
15.4
Pleurosigma
delicatalum
Rhoi
cosp
heni
a curvata
Rhopalodia musculus
Suri
rell
a angustata
Surirella
oval is
Surirella
ovata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
aSn
yedr
a radiens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
var.
familiaris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
cont
ract
aSy
nedr
a ulna v
ar.
dani
caSy
nedr
a ulna var. ox
yrhy
nchu
sSy
nedr
a sp.
Thalassiosira
fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GRE
EN A
LGAE)
Actinastrum ha
ntzs
chii
Actinastrum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Ankistro
desmus co
nvol
utus
v.
acicular
isAnkistro
desmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus falcatus va
r.acicularis
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r. mi
rabi
lis
Cart
eria
sp.
Chlamydomonas
sp.
Chlo
rell
a sp
. Ch
loro
cocc
um h
umic
ola
Chlorococcum sp.
Chlorogonium s
pira
le
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chodatella quadriseta
Closterium sp.
Cocc
omyx
a minor
Crucigenia qu
adra
ta
282.
5
573.3
280.8
170
9.9
170
4.6
0.0
0.0
280.
8
Tabl
e 15. Ta
xa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cell
s % Comp
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE
)--C
onti
nued
Di
ctyo
spha
eriu
m ehrenbergianum
Dictyosp
haer
ium pulchellum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Golenkinia ra
diat
a Go
lenk
inio
psis
so
lita
ria
Goni
um sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a contorta
Mesotaenium
sp.
Micratinium pusillum
Micratinium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pandorina morum
Phacotus le
ntic
ular
is
Phacotus sp.
Platymon
as sp
. Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
armatus
Scen
edes
mus
bijuga
Scen
edes
mus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schroederia
judayi
Schr
oede
ria
setigera
Selenastrum minutum
Sphaerocystis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treu
bari
a sp.
85 854.
9 4.9
June
27,
1985--Continued
140
3.8
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGAE)
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n spirale
Keph
yrio
n sp.
Mallomon
as ac
aroi
des
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Mallomonas sp.
Pleurosigma
delicatulum
Pleurosigma
sp.
Ochr
omon
as sp.
CYANOPHYTA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
1,05
0 61
.0
1,56
0 42.4
420
38.2
0
0.0
Anab
aena
sp
. Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
--
--
230
6.3
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
disp
ersu
sCh
rooc
occu
s limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
28
1.6
28
0.8
--
--Dactyloc
occopsis fascicularis
28
1.6
85
2.3
Dactyloc
occopsis sp.
--
28
0.8
Lyng
bya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
--
310
28.2
Mars
soni
ella
elegans
Osci
llat
oria
angusta
Osci
llat
oria
an
gust
issi
maOs
cill
ator
ia limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
tenuis
Oscillat
oria
sp
. --
--
--
--
110
10.0
Phormidiim sp.
Synechococcus
lineare
110
6.4
280
7.6
Synechococcus
sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
--
--
--
--'
Syne
choc
occu
s sp
. 88
0 51
.2
910
24.7
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)
85
4.9
28
0.8
85
7.7
0 0.
0 Chroomonas sp
.Cr
ypto
mona
s er
osa
28
1.6
28
0.8
Cryp
tomo
nas
mars
onii
Cr
ypto
mona
s ov
ata
Tabl
e 15. Ta
xa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enne
y Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 1985-87 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenn
ey Res
ervo
ir (s
ite
1)2-ft
Comp
osit
e depth
(0-1
0 ft
)
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)--
Cont
inue
d Cryptomonas
rost
rata
Cri/ptomonas rostratiformis
Crgp
tomo
nas
sp.
Rhod
omon
as mi
nuta
EUGLENOPHYTA
(E
UGLE
NOID
S)
Euglena
acus
Euglena
viridis
Eugl
ena
sp.
Trac
helo
mona
s sp
.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Cera
tium
hir
undi
nell
a Gy
mnod
iniu
m sp.
Peri
dini
um bic
eps
Peridinium in
cons
picu
a Pe
ridi
nium sp.
Total
cell
s and pe
rcen
t composition
Number of
species
Diversity
inde
x (DI) at sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biom
ass
(mg/
L dr
y we
ight
)
Chlo
roph
yll
a (pg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
b (pg/L)
Chlorophyll
c (pg/L)
June 27,
1985 Continued
573.3
0.0
0.0
85
0.0
7.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1,72
0 182.81 1.2
0.20
0.06
0.23
100
3,68
0 10
0
263.
56 3.0
__
__
__
1,10
0 100
153.31 1.9 __
__
370 11
3.23 1.6 __
100 -- -- __
July
19,
1985
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS)
CENTRALES
Cycl
otel
la bodanica
Cyclotella ku
tzin
gian
aCyclotella me
negh
inia
naCy
clot
ella
pseudostelligera
Cycl
otel
la st
elli
gera
Melosira gr
anul
ata
var. an
gust
issi
maMelosira italica
Melosira li
rata
Melosira sp
.Rh
izos
olen
ia eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us alpinus
Step
hano
disc
us as
trea
Stephanodiscus niagarae
Step
hano
disc
us te
nuis
Stephanodiscus sp
.
PENN
ALES
Ach
nant
/ies
a
ffin
isAchnanthes la
nceo
lata
Achn
anth
es mi
nuti
ssim
aAm
phor
a pe
rpus
illa
Amphora
veneta
Amphora
sp.
Asterionel
la formosa
Cocc
onei
s placentula
Cylindroth
eca
gracilis
Cylindroth
eca
sp.
Cymatopl
eura
so
lea
Cymbella affinis
Cymbella mi
nuta
Cymbella mi
nuta
f.
la
tens
Cymb
ella
mi
nuta
var. si
lesi
caCy
mbel
la si
nuat
aDiatoma
ance
psDiatoma
hiemale
var. mesodon
3 1,800
,700 59
880
430
110
27
12 0 6 3 0
.1
.1 .4
.3 .1 .8
4,100
3,000
1,80
0
260
400
41.
30.
18. 2. 4.
0 0 0 6 0
5,10
0 200
140 28
28 __
68 2 1 0 0 _
.0
.7 .9 .4
.4 _
7,100
310
310
__
80.7
3.5
3.5
-- __
180
1.3
560
5.6
2,10
0 15
.0
1,10
0 11.0
4,90
0 65
.3
6,80
0 77.3
280.4
600
8.0
710
0.1
8.1
Table
15.-
-Ta.
xa,
numbers, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cells
% Co
mp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cells
% Co
mp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Comp
BA
CIL
LAR
IOPH
YTA
(D
IAT
OM
S)-
Con
tinu
ed
July
19
IM
S-C
onti
nued
FE
MA
LE
S--
Con
tinu
edDiatoma
tenue
var.
el
onga
tum
Diatoma
vulg
are
--
--
--
--
28
0.4
28
0.3
Dipl
onei
s sp
.E
pit
hez
nia
so
rex
Eunoti
a sp
.Fragilaria ca
puci
naFragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFr
agil
aria p
innata
Fragilaria vaucheriae
Goz
npho
nezn
a an
gu
stat
um
Gyro
sigm
a spencerii
Hannaea
arcus
--
--
--
14
0.2
Hannaea
arcus
var.
az
nphi
oxys
Hannaea
arcu
s va
r. arcus
Hantzschia am
phio
xys
Meri
dion
circulare
Wavi
cula
arvensis
14
0.1
--
68
0.9
Wavi
cula
capitata
Wavicula cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
--
--
--
--
--
--
57
0.6
Wavi
cula
gastrum
Wavicu-Za he
ufle
ri
--
--
--
--
--
--
19
0.2
Navi
cula
lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
--
--
--
--
--
--
38
0.4
Wavi
cula
znenisculus
var.
up
saliensis
Navi
cula
mi
nima
Navi
cula
min
uscu
la
--
--
--
--
68
0.9
Navi
cula
mu
tica
Navi
cula
not
ha
--
--
--
--
28
0.4
19
0.2
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la p
upul
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a va
r. te
nell
aNavicula rh
ynco
ceph
ala
14
0.1
200
2.1
19
0.2
Navi
cula
sabinians
var.
intermedia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
aNa
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
a
--
19
0.2
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
laNa
vicu
la viridula v
ar.
avea
me
--
--
57
0.6
Navi
cula
viridula va
r. avenacea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a communis
12
0.1
Nitz
schi
a dissipata
--
32
0.3
180
2.4
960
10.9
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
naNi
tzsc
hia
hung
aric
aNi
tzsc
hia
ignorata
--
--
240
2.7
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
is
--
--
--
--
90
1.2
Nitz
schi
a lo
ngis
sima
var
. re
vers
aNi
tzsc
hia
microcephala
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
--
45
0.6
360
4.1
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
ea
310
2.2
81
0.8
450
6.0
960
10.9
Nitz
schi
a pu
sill
aNi
tzsc
hia
roma
naNi
tzsc
hia
ther
mali
sNi
tzsc
hia
tryblionella va
r. debilis
Nitz
schi
a sp.
~
120
1.4
Pleurosigma
delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curv
ata
--
--
--
--»
Rhopalodia musculus
Suri
rell
a angustata
Suri
rell
a ovalis
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
Syne
dra
acus
38
0.3
19
0.2
170
1.9
Syne
dra
delicatissima
38
0.3
39
0.4
110
1.5
230
2.6
Tabl
e 15
.--T
axa
t numbers/ and percent
composition
of phytoplankton at si
tes
1 and
2 in Kenney Res
ervo
ir/
water years
1985-87 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) --Continued
PENNALES- -C
onti
nued
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Synedra
minuscula
Snyedra
radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rumpens
var.
fa
mili
aris
Syne
dra
ulna
Synedra
ulna va
r. co
ntra
cta
Synedra
ulna
va
r. danica
Synedra
ulna
va
r. ox
yrhy
nchu
sSynedra
sp.
rhal
assi
osir
a fl
uvia
tili
s
CHLOROPHYTA
(GRE
EN ALG
AE)
Acti
nast
rum
hant
zsch
iiAc
tina
stru
m sp.
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-
ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Comp
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cells
% Comp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Comp
July 19,
1985--Continued
150
1.1
580
4.1
-- 770
5.5
150
1.1
-- -- -- .- --
5,40
0 38
.6__ 200
1.4
-- 97
1.0
210
2.1
19
0.2
350
3.5
190
1.9
39
0.4
-- -- ----
5,200
52.0
__ __
160
2.1
-- -- --1,
600
21.3
1,10
0 14.7
110
1.5
-- -- --
1,40
0 18.7
__ __
110
1.3
450
5.1
-- 57
0.6
1,30
0 14
.874
0 8.4
-- -- -- 85
1.0
1,60
0 18.2
__ __An
feis
trod
esmu
s co
nvol
utus
An
feis
trod
esmu
s convolutus v.
acicul
aris
Anki
strode
smus
falcatus
Anki
strode
smus
falcatus va
r.ac
icul
aris
Anki
stro
desm
us falcatus va
r.mira
Jbil
is
Cart
eria
sp
. Ch
lamy
domo
nas
sp.
Chlo
rell
a sp
. Chloroco
ccum
hum
icol
a Chlorococcum sp.
Chlorogonium spirale
28
0.4
110
0.8
57
0.6
170
1.2
280.4
280.3
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chodatella quadriseta
Clos
teri
um sp.
Cocc
omyx
a minor
Crucigenia qu
adra
ta
Dictyosphaerium
ehrenbergianum
Dictyospha
eriu
m pulchellum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
sp.
Gloeocysti
s sp.
Golenkinia ra
diat
a Go
lenk
iniops
is solitaria
Gonium sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a contorta
Mesotaenium
sp.
Micr
atin
ium pu
sill
um
Micr
atin
ium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocytis
sp.
Pand
orin
a morum
Phac
otus
lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Platymonas sp.
Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
arma
tus
Scen
edes
mus
hijuga
Scen
edes
mus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serr
atus
Sc
ened
esmu
s sp.
Schroederia
juda
yi
Schroederi
a setigera
Sele
nast
rum minutum
Spha
eroc
ysti
s schroeteri
Stau
rast
rum
sp.
Treubaria
sp.
170
1.2
280
2.8
4,60
0 32
.9
4,700
47.0
28
0.3
85
0.6
57
0.4
28
0.2
28
0.2
280
3.7
28
0.4
800
10.7
110
1.1
140 57
1.9
0.8
28
0.4
800
340
450
9.1
3.9
5.1
28
0.3
28
0.3
57
0.8
Table
15.-
-rax
a, nu
mber
s/ an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Rese
rvoi
r, wa
ter
year
s 1985-87-
-Continued
PHYL
UM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-
ft
Comp
osit
e depth
(0-1
0 ft)
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
Comp
osit
e___________
__________
depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Comp
CHRYSOPHYTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Kephyrion
spir
ale
Keph
yrio
n sp.
Mallomonas acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mallomonas globosa
Mallomonas sp.
Pleu
rosi
gma
deli
catu
lum
Pleurosigma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYANOPHYTA (B
LUE-
GREE
N ALGAE)
AnaJ
baen
a sp.
Aphanocapsa
deli
cati
ssim
a Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dactylococcopsis fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyngbya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Marssoniella elegans
Oscillatoria angusta
Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
te
nuis
Oscillatoria sp
.
0.0
4,30
0 30
.7
230
1.6
July 19,
1985
--Co
ntin
ued
0 0.0
0 0.0
0.0
540
5.4
910
12.1
0.0
510
3.6
1,70
0 12.1
230
2.3
110
0.8
280
2.8
Phormidiiun
sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s lineare
57
0.4
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
Synechococcus
sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
1,700
12.1
28
0.3
910
12.1
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)
57
0.4
85
0.9
57
0.8
28
0.3
Chroomonas sp.
57
0.4
28
0.3
Cryp
tomo
nas
eros
a --
--
57
0.6
57
0.8
28
0.3
Cryp
tomo
nas
marsonii
Cryp
tomo
nas
ovata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rata
Cr
ypto
mona
s ro
stra
tifo
rmis
Cr
ypto
mona
s sp.
Rhodomon
as mi
nuta
EUGL
ENOP
HYTA
(EUGLENOIDS)
28
0.2
0 0.0
0 0.
0 57
0.
6 Eu
glen
a acus
Eugl
ena
viri
dis
Eugl
ena
sp.
--
--
--
--
57
0.6
Trac
helo
mona
s sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Cera
tium
hir
undi
nell
aGymnodinium
sp.
Peridiniiun bi
ceps
Peri
dini
um in
cons
picu
aPeridiniiun
sp.
Total
cell
s and
perc
ent
comp
osit
ion
Number of
sp
ecie
sDiversity
inde
x (D
I) at
species
level
Biomass
(mg/
L dry
weight)
Chlo
roph
yll
a (p
g/L)
Chlorophyll
b (p
g/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
c (p
g/L)
28 56 -- -- 28 28
14,0
00 343.
51 3.2
2.1
3.4
8.4
0.2
0.4
28
0.3
__ __ 0.2
0.2
28
0.3
97
10,0
00
100
262.85 3.5
1.9
0.3
0.7
__ 56
0.7
28
0.4
__ __ 28
0.4
__
7,50
0 100
333.
83 4.4
5.3
7.5
9.5
__
__
0 0.
0__ __ __ __ __
8,80
0 10
0
314.
02 6.5
1.1
1.4
5.4
Tabl
e 15.--Taxa, numbers, and percent composition
of phytoplankton at sites
1 and
2 in
Ke
nney
Reservoir,
water
years
1985
-87-
-Con
tinu
ed
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
species
BACILLARIOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
)CENTRALES
Cycl
otel
la bo
dani
caCyclotella kutzingiana
Cycl
otel
la me
negh
inia
naCy
clot
ella
pse
udos
tell
iger
aCyclotella st
elli
gera
Melosira granulata
var. angrustissima
Melosira italica
Melo
sira
lirata
Melosira sp.
Khiz
osol
enia
eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us al
pinu
sStephanodiscus as
trea
Step
hano
disc
us ni
agar
aeSt
epha
nodi
scus
tenuis
Step
hano
disc
us sp.
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-
ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
4,900
44.5
4,90
0 44
.5-- -- 28
0.3
4,800
43.6
28
0.3
-- __ __ __ __ -- -- __
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Augu
st
3,70
0 42
.23,600
41.4
-- -- --3,
600
41.4
-- __ __ __ __ __ __ -- -- __
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cells
% Comp
7, 1985
1,300
52.0
1,100
44.0
-- __ 85
3.4
1,000
40.0
__ __ __ __ __ -- -_
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Comp
740
27.4
460
17.0
-- __ 57
2.1
370
13.7
-- __ __ __ __ __ 28
1.0
-- --
PENN
ALES
Achn
anth
es affinis
Achn
anth
es la
nceo
lata
Achnanthes mi
nuti
ssim
a Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
veneta
Amph
ora
sp.
Asterionella fo
rmos
a Co
ccon
eis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
280.3
570.7
204
8.2
280
10.4
Cymb
ella
af
fini
sCymbella m
inuta
Cymbella m
inuta
f. 2atens
Cymb
ella
minuta
var.
silesica
Cymbella si
nuat
aDi
atom
a anceps
Diat
oma
hiem
ale
var.
mesodon
Diat
oma
tenu
e va
r. e2
onga
tum
Diat
oma
vulgare
Dipl
onei
s sp.
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Euno
tia
sp.
Fragilaria capucina
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pinnata
Fragilaria vaucheriae
Gomp
hone
ma angustatum
Gyro
sigm
a spencerii
Hann
aea
arcus
Hannaea
arcus
var.
amphioxys
Hann
aea
arcus
var.
arcus
Hantzschia amphioxys
Meridion c
ircu
lare
Navi
cula
ar
vens
isNa
vicu
la capitata
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cryptocephala
var.
vene
taNa
vicu
la ga
stru
mNa
vicu
la h
eufl
eri
Navi
cula
la
nceo
lata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
menisculus
var.
upsaliensis
Navi
cula
minima
Navi
cula
min
uscu
laNa
vicu
la mu
tica
Navi
cula
notha
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la p
upul
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a va
r. tene22a
28
1.1
28
1.1
28
1.0
7 0.
3
28
1.1
14
0.5
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numb
ers,
an
d percent
composition
of p
hi/t
opla
nkto
n at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enne
y Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 1985-87--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-
ft
depth
Cells
% Co
mp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Comp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Comp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
PE
NNAL
ES Con
tinu
ed
Navi
cula
rhyncocephala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var.
in
term
edia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
a Na
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
a Na
vicu
la viridula
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la va
r. av
eame
Na
vicu
la vi
ridu
la v
ar.
aven
acea
Na
vicu
la sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a communis
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ig
nora
ta
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
is
Nitz
schi
a lo
ngis
sima
var
. reversa
Nitz
schi
a mi
croc
epha
la
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
ea
Nitz
schi
a pusilla
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
Ni
tzsc
hia
thermalis
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la va
r. de
bili
s Ni
tzsc
hia
sp.
Augu
st 7, 1985--Continued
281.
1
570.7
281.
1
57
2.3
28
1.0
28 57 14 28 28
1.0
2.1
0.5
1.0
1.0
Pleurosigz
na de
lica
talu
mRhoicosphenia
curvata
Rhopalodia musculus
Surirella
angustata
Surirella
oval
isSurirella
ovat
a
28
1.0
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
aSn
yedr
a ra
dien
sSy
nedr
a ru
mpen
sSy
nedr
a rumpens
var.
familiaris
Syne
dra
ulna
28
0.3
--
~
~
28
1.0
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna va
r. danica
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
oxyr
hync
hus
Syne
dra
sp.
Thal
assios
ira
fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
5,600
50.9
4,900
56.3
1,100
44.0
1,500
55.6
Acti
nast
ruro
han
tzsc
hii
Actinastru
m sp.
Anki
stro
desmus co
nvol
utus
An
kist
rodesmus co
nvol
utus
v.
acicularis
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r.acicularis
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r. mi
rabi
lis
Cart
eria
sp.
110
1.0
28
0.3
--
28
1.0
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp
. --
57
0.7
28
1.1
170
6.3
Ch.Z
ore2
.Za
sp.
Chlo
rococc
um hum
icol
aCh
loro
cocc
um sp.
28
0.3
85
1.0
--
Chlo
rogo
nium sp
iral
e Ch
loro
goni
um sp.
Chodatella qu
adri
seta
Cl
oste
rium sp.
Coccomyxa
minor
Crucigenia qu
adra
ta
Tabl
e l5
.--T
axa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Rese
rvoi
r, wa
ter
years
1985
-57-
-Con
tinu
ed
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)Rn
2-ft
Co
mpos
ite
2-ft
Comp
osit
er
. depth
(0-1
0 ft)
depth
(0-1
0 ft)
nus
sPec
ies
Cell
s % Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
-Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN ALGAE)-Continued
AugU
St 7
> ^--Continued
Dictyosphaerium
ehrenbergianum
Dictyosphaerium pulchellum
Dictyosphaerium
sp.
Gloeocysti
s sp.
--
--
--
28
1.1
Gole
nkin
ia radiata
Gole
nkin
iops
is solitaria
Gonium sp
.Ki
rchn
erie
lla
contorta
Weso
taen
ium
sp.
Micr
atin
ium pusillum
Micr
atin
ium
sp.
Woug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pandorina
mori
on
--
--
--
--
--
--
340
12.6
Phacotus le
ntic
ular
isPhacotus sp.
5,400
49.1
4,700
54.0
77
0 30
.8
940
34.8
Platymonas sp.
Pteromonas sp
. --
--
--
--
--
--
28
1.0
Scen
edes
mus
armatus
--
--
--
--
37
1.5
Scen
edes
mus
biju
gaSc
ened
esmu
s di
morp
hus
Scen
edes
mus
quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schroede
ria
juda
yiSc
hroe
deri
a setigera
Selenastrum minutum
57
0.5
Spha
eroc
ysti
s schroeteri
Staurastru
m sp
. --
--
230
9.2
Treubaria
sp.
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOL
DEN-
BROW
N ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n spirale
Keph
yrio
n sp.
Mall
omon
as acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mall
omon
as gl
obos
a Ma
llom
onas
sp.
Pleurosigma
delicatulum
Pleurosigma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYANOPHYTA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
Anab
aena
sp
.Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
dispersus
Chroococcus
limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp
. Lyngbya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Ma
rsso
niel
la el
egan
s Os
cill
ator
ia angusta
Osci
llat
oria
an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Oscillatoria tenuis
Osci
llat
oria
sp.
Phor
midi
um sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s lineare
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp
.
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
Chro
omon
as sp.
Cryp
tomo
nas
erosa
Cryptomonas
mars
onii
Cryptomonas
ovata
0.0
28
0.3
28
0.3
57
2.3
28
1.0
57
2.3
140
1.3
0 0.0
28
1.1
85
0.8
28
1.1
57 56 28
0.5
0.5
0.3
28 28
0.3
0.3
56 28 28
2.2
1.1
1.1
28
1.0
230
8.5
230
8.5
230 85 57
8.4
3.1
2.1
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enne
y Reservoir, water
years
1985
-87 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S) C
onti
nued
Cr
ypto
mona
s rostrata
Cryptomonas
rost
rati
form
is
Cryp
tomo
nas
sp.
Rhodomonas mi
nuta
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)
Euglena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Eugl
ena
sp.
Trachelomonas
sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Ceratium hir
undi
nell
a Gymnodinium
sp.
Peri
dinium bic
eps
Peridinium in
cons
picu
a Pe
ridi
nium sp.
August 7,
1985 Continued
280.
3
0.0
0.0
0 0.
00
0.0
0 0.
00
0.0
85
3.1
0 0.
0
0 0.
0
Total
cell
s and pe
rcen
t composition
Number of sp
ecie
sDiversity
inde
x (DI) at sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biomass
(mg/
L dry
weig
ht)
Chlorophyll
a (pg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
b (Mg/L)
Chlorophyll
c (Mg/L)
11,000
97
121.36 5.0
1.6
2.1
2.0
8,700
99
81.
24 3.4
1.8
2.7
1.4
2,500
102
182.60 1.9
0.8
1.9
2.7
2,700 23
3.33 1.8
1.0
0.3
0.0
101 __ -- -- -- --
August 28,
1985
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIATOMS)
CENT
RALE
SCy
clot
ella
bo
dani
caCy
clot
ella
kutzingiana
Cyclotella m
eneg
hini
ana
Cycl
otella
pseudostelligera
Cyclotella st
elli
gera
Melo
sira
gr
anul
ata
var.
an
gustis
sima
Melo
sira
italica
Melo
sira
lirata
Melo
sira
sp.
Rhizosolenia eriensis
Step
hanodi
scus
alpinus
Stephanodiscus astrea
Step
hano
disc
us ni
agar
aeSt
epha
nodi
scus
tenuis
Stephanodiscus sp.
PENN
ALES
Achnanthes af
fini
sAc
hnan
thes
lanceolata
Achnanthes minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
vene
taAmphora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella formosa
Cocconeis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
grac
ilis
Cyli
ndro
thec
a sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
Cymbella affinis
Cymb
ella
minuta
Cymbella mi
nuta
f.
latens
Cymb
ella mi
nuta
var
. silesica
Cymb
ella
sinuata
Diatoma
anceps
Diatoma
hiemale
var.
me
sodo
n
0.0
0.0
610
580 85 500
38.1
36.3 5.3
31.3
0.0
281.
8
330
160 57 99 170 14 57
23.6
11.4 4.1
7.1
12.1 1.0
4.1
590 14 14
31.1
0.7
0.7
580
30.5
14 710.
7 3.7
Table
15. Taxa,
numbers, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7--Conti
nued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cell
s % Comp
to
to
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS)--Continued
PENNALES--Co
ntin
ued
Diatoma
tenu
e va
r. elongation
Diatoma
vulgare
Dipl
onei
s sp
.Ep
ithe
mia
sorex
Euno
tia
sp.
Fragilaria ca
puci
naFragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pi
nnat
aFragilar
ia va
uche
riae
Gomp
honema
angustatim
Gyrosigma
spencerii
Hannaea
arcus
Hannaea
arcu
s va
r. amphioxys
Hannaea
arcus
var. ar
cus
Hantzsch
ia amphioxys
Meridion circulare
Navi
cula
ar
vens
isNa
vicu
la ca
pita
taNa
vicu
la cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
Navi
cula
gastrum
Navi
cula
heu
fier
iNa
vicu
la lanceolata
Navi
cula
lu
zone
nsis
Navi
cula
men
iscu
lus
var.
up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la m
inima
Navi
cula
min
uscu
laNa
vicu
la m
utica
Navi
cula
not
ha
August 28
, 1985--Continued
140.
7
14 28
0.7
1.5
140.
7
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la p
upul
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la radiosa
var.
tenella
Navi
cula
rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var. interm
edia
Navi
cula
tantula
Navi
cula
tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la viridula
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
meNa
vicu
la viridula va
r. av
enac
eaNa
vicu
la sp
.Ni
tzsc
hia
acicularis
Nitz
schi
a co
mmun
isNi
tzsc
hia
diss
ipat
aNi
tzsc
hia
filiformis
Nitz
schi
a frustulum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
naNi
tzsc
hia
hung
aric
aNi
tzsc
hia
ignorata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a Iatens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
isNi
tzsc
hia
longissima va
r. re
vers
aNi
tzsc
hia
microcephala
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNi
tzsc
hia
pusilla
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
l is
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la va
r. debilis
Nitz
schi
a sp.
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatalum
Rhoi
cosp
heni
a curvata
Rhopalodia mu
scul
usSu
rire
lla
angustata
Suri
rell
a ov
alis
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
432.
3
14 28
0.7
1.5
141.0
0.4
0.5
14 437
1.0
3.1
0.5
7 14 28 14 43 43 7 43 71 7 14 14
0.4
0.7
1.5
0.7
2.3
2.3
0.4
2.3
3.7
0.4
0.7
0.7
140.
7
141.0
Tabl
e 15.--Ta.xa,
numbers, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
sites
1 and
2 in
Ke
nney
Reservoir, water
years
1985-87--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft
)
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
__
___
depth
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIATOMS) Continued
PENN
ALES
--Co
ntin
ued
Synedra
fasc
icul
ate
Synedra
minu
scul
a Snyedra
radi
ens
Synedra
rump
ens
Synedra
rump
ens
var.
fa
mili
aris
Synedra
ulna
Synedra
ulna var. co
ntra
cta
Synedra
ulna var. danica
Synedra
ulna
va
r. oxyrhynchus
ro
Synedra
sp.
Thalassiosira
fluv
iati
lis
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN AL
GAE)
Actinastru
m ha
ntzs
chii
Ac
tina
stru
m sp.
Anki
stro
desm
us co
nvol
utus
An
kist
rode
smus
co
nvol
utus
v.
acic
ular
isAn
kist
rode
smus
fa
lcat
us
Anki
stro
desm
us falcatus var.
acicul
aris
Anki
stro
desm
us falcatus var. miraMlis
Carteria sp
. Chlamydomonas
sp.
Chlorella
sp.
Chlorococcum hum
icol
a Chloroco
ccum
sp.
Chlorogoni
um sp
iral
e
August 28
, 1985--Continued
281.
8
370
52.1
680
42.5
270
19.3
28
260
3.9
36.6
28 310
1.8
19.4
14 28
1.0
2.0
140.
7
0.0
fo
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chodatella quadriseta
Closterium sp.
Coccomyxa
mino
r Crucigenia quadrata
Dict
yosp
haerium
ehrenbergianum
Dictyosphaerium pulchellum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
sp.
Gloeocys
tis
sp.
Golenkinia radiata
Gole
nkin
iops
is so
lita
ria
Gonium sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a contorta
Meso
taen
ium
sp.
Micratinium pusillum
Micratinium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pandorina
morum
Phac
otus
lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Platymonas sp.
Pter
omon
as sp.
Scen
edes
mus
armatus
Scenedes
mus
biju
ga
Scen
edes
mus
dimo
rphu
s Sc
ened
esmu
s qu
adri
caud
a Sc
ened
esmu
s serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schr
oede
ria
juda
yi
Schroederia
setigera
Selenastrum mi
nutu
m Sphaerocystis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treubaria
sp.
282.
0
28
3.9
280
17.5
57
8.0
57
3.6
170
12.1
14
1.0
141.
0
ro ON
Tabl
e 15
.--r
axa,
numbers, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phytoplankt
on at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 1985-87-
-Con
tinued
PHYLUM
rVPTYPP
UKJJrjK
Genus
spec
ies
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGA
E)Di
nobr
yon
divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
eKe
phyr
ion
sp.
Mallomonas acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mallomonas gl
obos
aMa
llom
onas
sp
.Pleurosigma
delicatulum
Pleurosigma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
Augu
st 28
,
28
3.9
7 0.4
__ -- -- -- __ -- 28
3.9
7 0.4
-- -- --
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e2-ft
depth
Cells
% Comp
1985--Continued
500
35.7
360
25.7
110
7.9
-- __ __ 28
2.0
-- -- --
2)Composite
(0-1
0Cells
490
450 -- 14 -- 14 -- 14
ft)
% Comp
25.8
23.7 -- 0.7
-- -- -- 0.7
-- 0.7
--
CYANOPHYTA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
AnaJbaena
sp.
Aphanoca
psa
deli
cati
ssim
a Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanoth
ece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
disp
ersu
s Ch
rooc
occu
s limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dactyloc
occopsis fascicularis
Dactyloc
occopsis sp.
Lyng
bya
limnetic a
Lyngbya
nana
Marssoniella el
egan
s Os
cill
ator
ia angusta
Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Oscillatoria limnetica
Oscillatoria tenuis
Oscillatoria sp.
0.0
855.3
57 57
4.1
580
4.1
14
30.5 0.7
310
16.3
260
13.7
Phormidi
um sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s lineare
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. minor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
--
85
5.3
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
310
43.7
170
10.6
28
2.0
0 0.
0 Chroomonas sp
. --
28
1.8
14
1.0
Cryptomo
nas
erosa
--
--
28
1.8
Cryptomo
nas
marsonii
28
3.9
57
3.6
Cryptomo
nas
ovat
aCr
ypto
mona
s ro
stra
ta
--
--
--
--
14
1.0
Cryptomo
nas
rost
rati
form
isCr
ypto
mona
s sp.
280
39.4
57
3.6
Rhodomonas mi
nuta
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)
0 0.
0 0
0.0
200
14.3
19
0 10.0
Eugl
ena
acus
Euglena
viridis
Eugl
ena
sp.
--
--
--
--
200
14.3
190
10.0
!Tr a che
lom
onas sp.
r
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DIN
OFLA
GELL
ATES
)Ce
rati
um hirundinella
Gymnodinium
sp.
Peridinium biceps
Peridini
um in
cons
picu
aPeridini
um sp.
Total
cell
s and
perc
ent
comp
osit
ion
Numb
er of
sp
ecie
sDi
vers
ity
index
(DI) at sp
ecie
s level
Biom
ass
(mg/
L dry
weight)
Chlo
roph
yll
a (Mg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
b (Mg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
c (M
g/L)
0 __ -- -- 710 7
2.09 1.8
0.7
0.0
2.9
0.0
0__ __ __ __ --
--
100
1,60
0 132.87 3.2
1.9
0.5
1.6
0.0
14
14__ __ __
__
97
1,400 24
3.65 4.5
2.0
0.9
2.4
1.0
14__ 1.
0__
14--
--
100
1,900 34
3.80
10.8 2.4
1.4
7.7
0.7
-- -- -- 0.7
98
__ -- -- -- --
00
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
years
1985-87--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cells
% Comp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Comp
September
17,
1985
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIATOMS)
110
23.9
470
CENTRALES
99
21.5
" 160
Cyclotella bo
dani
ca
Cyclotella ku
tzin
gian
aCy
clot
ella m
eneghiniana
28
6.1
14
Cycl
otel
la p
seud
oste
llig
era
57
12.4
99
Cycl
otel
la st
elli
gera
28
Melo
sira
granulata
var.
an
gust
issi
ma
Melo
sira
italica
Melo
sira
lirata
Melo
sira
sp.
Rhizosolenia er
iens
is
14
3.0
14
Step
hano
disc
us alpinus
Step
hano
disc
us as
trea
St
epha
nodi
scus
niagarae
Step
hano
disc
us te
nuis
St
epha
nodi
scus
sp.
PENNALES
14
3.0
310
Achnanthes affinis
Achn
anth
es lanceolata
Achnanthes minutissima
Amph
ora
perpusilla
Amph
ora
vene
ta
Amph
ora
sp.
Asterionella fo
rmos
a Cocconeis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
67.1
22.9 2.0
14.1 4.0
2.0
44.3
1,20
0 28 28
80.0
1.
9
1.9
1,20
080
.0
2,60
0 85 85
2,500 57
89.7
2.9
2.9
86.2
2.0
Cymbella affinis
Cymbella m
inut
aCymbella mi
nuta
f.
Iatens
Cywbella m
inuta
var.
silesica
Cymb
ella
sinuata
Diatoma
ance
psDi
atom
a hiemale
var. mesodon
Diat
oma
tenue
var.
el
onga
tum
Diat
oma
vulg
are
Dipl
onei
s sp.
Epithemia
sore
xEu
noti
a sp.
Frag
ilar
ia ca
puci
naFr
agil
aria
cr
oton
ensi
sFr
agil
aria
pi
nnat
aFr
agil
aria
va
uche
riae
Gomp
hone
ma angustatum
Gyrosigma
spencerii
Hann
aea
arcu
sHannaea
arcus
var.
amphioxys
Hann
aea
arcus
var.
ar
cus
Hantzschia amphioxys
Meri
dion
circulare
Navi
cula
ar
vens
isNavicula ca
pita
taNa
vicu
la cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var. veneta
Navi
cula
ga
stru
mNavicula heufleri
Navi
cula
lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
me
nisc
ulus
va
r. up
saliensis
Navi
cula
min
ima
Navi
cula
mi
nusc
ula
Navi
cula
mu
tica
Navi
cula
no
tha
Navicula pe
llic
osa
Navi
cula
pu
pula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNavicula radiosa
var.
tenella
57
3.8
450
15.5
28
1.0
28
1.0
310
44.3
281.9
28
0.3
143.0
0.6
28 28 28 28 28 28
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Tabl
e 15.--ra.xa/
numbers/ an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of
phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 1985-87 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cells
% Co
mp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Comp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Comp
BACILLARIOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
PE
NNAL
ES--
Cont
inue
d Na
vicu
la rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navi
cula sabinians
var.
intermedia
Navi
cula
tantula
Navi
cula
tripunctata
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la
Navi
cula
viridula v
ar.
avea
me
Navi
cula
viridula v
ar.
aven
acea
Na
vicu
la sp.
Nitz
schi
a ac
icul
aris
Ni
tzsc
hia
communis
Nitz
schia
dissipata
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schia
frustulum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
Nitz
schia
hung
aric
a Ni
tzsc
hia
ignorata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a la
tens
Ni
tzsc
hia
line
aris
Ni
tzsc
hia
longissima v
ar.
reversa
Nitz
schi
a mi
croc
epha
la
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
Nitz
schi
a paleacea
Nitz
schi
a pu
sill
a Ni
tzsc
hia
roma
na
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
l is
Ni
tzsc
hia
tryblionella va
r. de
bili
s Ni
tzsc
hia
sp.
September
17,
1985--Continued
310
20.7
230
15.3
110
7.3
140
9.3
28
1.9
28
1.9
28
1.9
140
9.3
57
3.8
28
1.9
940
32.4
280
9.7
85
2.9
57
2.0
110 57
200
0.1
3.8
2.0
6.9
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatalum
Rhoi
cosphe
nia
curvata
Rhopalodia musculus
Surirella
angustata
Surirella
ovalis
Surirella
ovat
aSy
nedr
a ac
usSy
nedr
a de
lica
tiss
ima
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
aSn
yedr
a radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Synedra
rumpens
var.
fa
mili
aris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna va
r. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna
var.
danica
Synedra
ulna v
ar.
oxyr
hync
hus
Syne
dra
sp.
rhal
assi
osir
a fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
99
21.5
46
6.6
230
15.3
20
0 6.9
Acti
nast
rum ha
ntzs
chii
Ac
tina
stru
m sp
. Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Anki
stro
desm
us convolutus v.
acicularis
An/f
istr
odes
nius
fa
lcat
us
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r.acicularis
Ankistrodesmus falcatus va
r. mi
rabi
lis
Carteria sp
. Ch
lamy
domo
nas
sp.
Chlorella
sp.
Chlo
roco
ccum
hum
icol
aCh
loro
cocc
um sp.
71
15.4
14
2.
0 Ch
loro
goni
um s
pirale
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
14
3.0
4 0.6
Chodatella quadriseta
Closterium sp.
Coccomyxa
minor
Cruc
igen
ia qu
adra
ta
Tabl
e 15.--Taxa, nu
mber
s, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of
phytoplankton at
sites
1 and
2 in Ken
ney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
species
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
1)Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Co
mpos
ite
2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft
) depth
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN AL
GAE)
--Co
ntin
ued
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
ehrenbergianum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium pu
lche
llum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nkin
ia ra
diat
aGo
lenk
inio
psis
so
lita
ria
Goni
um sp
.Ki
rchn
erie
lla
contorta
Weso
taen
ium
sp.
M
Wicr
atin
ium pusillum
f£
Wicr
atin
ium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocytis
sp.
Pand
orin
a moru
mPh
acot
us lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Platymonas sp
.Pteromonas sp
.Sc
ened
esmu
s armatus
Scen
edes
mus
bijuga
Scen
edes
mus
dimo
rphu
sSc
ened
esmu
s quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serr
atus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schr
oede
ria
judayi
Schroederia
setigera
Selenastrum mi
nutu
mSp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treujbaria sp
.
Sept
embe
r 17
, 1985--Continued
28
1.0
142.0
143.
0
142.
0
230
15.3
170
5.9
CO
CO
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOL
DEN-
BROW
N ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Mallomonas acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Ma
llom
onas
sp.
Pleurosigma
delicatulum
Pleu
rosi
gma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYAN
OPHY
TA (B
LUE-
GREE
N AL
GAE)
Anabaena sp.
Aphanoca
psa
delicatissima
Aphanoca
psa
sp.
Aphanoth
ece
sp.
Chroococ
cus
disp
ersu
s Ch
rooc
occu
s li
mnet
icus
Ch
rooc
occu
s sp
. Da
ctyl
ococ
cops
is fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyng
bya
limnetica
Lyng
bya
nana
Marssoniella elegans
Oscillatoria an
gust
a Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Oscillatoria te
nuis
Oscillatoria sp.
Phor
midi
um sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s lineare
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
Chroomonas sp.
Cryp
tomo
nas
eros
a Cryptomo
nas
mars
onii
Cr
ypto
mona
s ovata
28 28
6.1
6.1
1.0
1.0
28
1.9
28
1.0
190
41.3
71
10.1
28
6.1
57
8.1
160 28 -- 14
34
.8
6.1
-- 3.0
14 110 14 28
2.0
15.7
2.0
4.0
28
1.9
0 0.
0
28
1.0
0 0.0
281.
928
1.0
Tabl
e 15
.--T
axa,
numbers, and pe
rcen
t composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Ken
ney
tfes
ervo
ir,
water
years
1985-87 Continued
PHYL
UM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)Ke
nney
Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-
ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)--Continued
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rata
Cryptomonas
rostratiformis
Cryptomonas
sp.
Rhod
omon
as mi
nuta
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)
Euglena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
Trachelo
mona
s sp
.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Ceratium hirundinella
Gymnodin
ium
sp.
Peridinium biceps
Peridinium in
cons
picu
a Peridinium sp.
Sept
embe
r 17,
1985--Continued
143.
0
0.0
0.0
71
10.1 0.0
28
1.9
0 0.0
0.0
0 0.
0
28
1.0
0 0.0
0 0.
0
Total
cell
s and
percent
composition
Number of species
Diversity
inde
x (D
I) at
sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biomass
(mg/
L dr
y we
ight
)
Chlo
roph
yll
a (j
Jg/L
)Ch
loro
phyl
l b ([
Jg/L
)Chlorophyll
c (j
Jg/L
)
460
99
123.00 0.8
1.1
2.8
0.4
700
101
162.
85 0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
1,50
0 99
173.45 1.6
1.6
5.8
6.3
2,900 24
3.43 3.0
1.8
5.0
9.6
98
_ _
-- -- -- -- --
October
21,
1985
OJ 01
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS)
140
100.
0 230
95.8
CENTRALES
99
70.7
180
75.0
Cy
clot
ella
bodanica
Cycl
otel
la ku
tzin
gian
aCy
clot
ella
meneghiniana
71
50.7
170
70.8
Cyclotella ps
eudo
stel
lige
raCy
clot
ella
stelligera
28
20.0
14
5.8
Melo
sira
gr
anul
ata
var.
an
gust
issi
ma
Nelo
sira
it
alic
a Me
losi
ra li
rata
Ne
losi
ra sp.
Rhizosolenia eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us alpinus
Step
hano
disc
us as
trea
St
epha
nodi
scus
ni
agar
ae
Step
hano
disc
us te
nuis
St
epha
nodi
scus
sp.
PENNALES
42
30.0
53
22.1
Achn
anth
es affinis
Achnanthes lanceolata
Achnanthes minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
vene
ta
Amphora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
formosa
Cocconeis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
grac
ilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
Cymbella af
fini
s Cymbella m
inuta
Cymbella m
inuta
f. la
tens
Cymbella mi
nuta
var
. si
lesi
ca
Cymbella sinuata
Diatoma
ance
ps
Diatoma
hiemale
var.
mesodon
710 0
86.6
0.0
990 0
710 28
86.6
3.4
990
28 85
3.4
10.4
57 28 85 57
76.2
0.0
76.2 4.4
2.2
6.5
4.4
Table
15.--Ta.xa,
numbers/ an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
I an
d 2
in K
enney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
Kenney R
eser
voir
(s
ite
1)
Kenney R
eser
voir
(site
2)2-
ft
Composite
2-ft
Comp
osit
er
de
pth
(0-10
ft)
depth
(0-10
ft)
us sP
ecie
s Ce
lls
% Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
°Ctober 21
« ^--Continued
PENNALES--
Continued
Diat
oma
tenue
var.
el
onga
tum
Diat
oma
vulg
are
--
--
--
--
28
3.4
170
13.1
Dipl
onei
s sp.
Epit
hemi
a sorex
Eunotia
sp.
Fragilaria ca
puci
naFragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pi
nnat
aFragilaria va
uche
riae
--
--
--
--
28
3.
4Gomphonema angustatum
Gyro
sigma
spencerii
--
--
--
--
--
--
14
0.7
Hann
aea
arcu
s --
--
28
11
.7Ha
nnae
a arcus
var.
amphioxys
Hannaea
arcu
s var. ar
cus
Hantzschia amphioxys
Weri
dion
circulare
Wavi
cula
ar
vens
isNa
vicu
la capitata
Navi
cula cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
14
10.0
--
--
28
3.4
57
4.4
Navi
cula
gastrum
Navi
cula he
ufle
riNa
vicu
la lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
me
nisc
ulus
va
r. up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la minima
Navi
cula mi
nusc
ula
Navi
cula
mu
tica
Navi
cula
notha
--
--
--
28
3.4
28
2.2
Navi
cula
pe
llic
osa
Navi
cula
pu
pula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a va
r. te
nell
aNa
vicu
la rh
ynco
ceph
ala
--
--
--
--
--
--
114
8.8
Navi
cula
sa
bini
ans
var. interm
edia
Navi
cula
tantula
Navi
cula
tripunctata
Navi
cula
viridula
--
--
--
--
--
--
114
8.9
Navi
cula
viridula v
ar.
avea
me
--
--
--
--
370
45.1
140
10.8
Navi
cula
viridula va
r. av
enac
eaNa
vicu
la sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a communis
Nitz
schia
dissipata
14
10.0
7 2.9
--
--
57
4.4
Nitz
schi
a fi
lifo
rmis
Nitz
schi
a frustulum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
--
--
--
--
28
3.4
28
2.2
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ig
nora
tau>
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
«^jNi
tzsc
hia
latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
isNi
tzsc
hia
longissima va
r. re
vers
aNi
tzsc
hia
microcephala
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
--
--
--
--
28
3.4
28
2.2
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
ea
14
10.0
4 1.7
Nitz
schi
a pu
sill
aNi
tzsc
hia
roma
naNi
tzsc
hia
ther
mali
sNi
tzsc
hia
tryblionella va
r. debilis
Nitz
schi
a sp.
--
--
--
--
--
28
2.2
Pleu
rosi
gma
deli
cata
lum
Rhoicosphenia
curvata
Rhopalodia musculus
Surirella
angustata
Suri
rell
a ovalis
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
--
--
--
--
28
3.4
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers, an
d percent
comp
osit
ion
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
sites
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7--C
onti
nued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
1)Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
00
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIATOMS)--Continued
PENNALES--
Cont
inue
d Sy
nedr
a fa
scic
ulat
e Synedra
minu
scul
a Snyedra
radiens
Synedra
rump
ens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
var.
fa
mili
aris
Sy
nedr
a ulna
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
contracta
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
dani
ca
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. ox
yrhy
nchu
s Sy
nedr
a sp.
rhal
assios
ira
fluv
iati
lis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GRE
EN A
LGAE)
Actinastrum
hant
zsch
ii
Actinastrum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Ankistrodesmus convolutus v.
acic
ular
isAnkistrodesmus fa
lcat
us
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r.acicularis
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r. mirabilis
Cart
eria sp.
Chla
mydomo
nas
sp.
Chlo
rell
a sp.
Chlo
rococcum hum
icol
a Ch
loro
coccum sp.
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp
iral
e
October
21,
1985
--Co
ntin
ued
145.
8
0.0
145.8
0.0
0.0
145.
8
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chodatella quadriseta
Closterium sp.
Coccomyxa minor
Crucigenia quadrata
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
ehrenbergianum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium pulchellum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Golenkinia radiata
Gole
nkin
iops
is solitaria
Gonium sp
.Kirchneriella
cont
orta
Mesotaenium
sp.
Micratinium pusillum
Micr
atin
ium
sp.
Woug
eotia
sp.
Oocytis
sp.
Pandorina
morum
Phacotus lenticularis
Phac
otus
sp.
Platymon
as sp.
Pteromon
as sp.
Scen
edes
mus
armatus
Scen
edes
mus
biju
ga
Scen
edes
mus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scen
edes
mus
serr
atus
Sc
ened
esmu
s sp.
Schr
oederi
a judayi
Schr
oederi
a se
tige
ra
Selenastrum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
TreiLbar
ia sp.
Tabl
e l5.--Taxa
f numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enne
y Reservoir, water
years
1985
-87-
-Con
tinu
ed
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenney Reservoir (site
1)Kenney Reservoir (site
2)2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Comp
Cell
s % Comp
Cell
s % Comp
Cell
s % Comp
.£> O
CHRYSOPHYTA
(GOL
DEN-
BROW
N ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Nall
omonas
acaroides
Nall
omonas
ak
roko
nos
Mall
omonas
gl
obos
a Mallomonas sp
. Pl
euro
sigm
a delicatuliun
Pleu
rosigm
a sp.
Ochr
omonas
sp.
CYAN
OPHY
TA (B
LUE-
GREE
N AL
GAE)
An
afaa
ena
sp.
Aphanoca
psa
deli
cati
ssim
a Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chroococcu
s dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
limneticus
Chroococcu
s sp.
Dactylococcopsis fascicularis
Dactylococcopsis sp.
Lyng
bya
limn
etic
a Ly
ngby
a nana
Marssoniella elegans
Osci
llat
oria
angusta
Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Oscillatoria limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
te
nuis
Oscillatoria sp.
0.0
October 21
, 1985--Continued
0 0.0
0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
110
13.4
280
280
21.5
21.8
110
13.4
Phormidium sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s li
near
e Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.0
0 0.
0 Chroomon
as sp.
Cryp
tomo
nas
eros
a Cryptomo
nas
marsonii
Cryp
tomo
nas
ovata
Cryptomo
nas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rati
form
is
Cryp
tomo
nas
sp.
Rhodomonas mi
nuta
EUGL
ENOP
HYTA
(E
UGLE
NOID
S)
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Eugl
ena
acus
Eu
glen
a vi
ridi
s Euglena
sp.
Trachelomonas
sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Ceratium hirundinella
Gymnodinium
sp.
Peridinium biceps
Peridinium in
cons
picu
a Peridinium sp.
Total
cell
s and
perc
ent
comp
osit
ion
Numb
er of
sp
ecie
sDi
vers
ity
index
(DI) at
sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biomass
(mg/
L dr
y weight)
Chlorophyll
a (pg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
b (pg/L)
Chlorophyll
c (pg/L)
140
100
51.
95 3.0
<0.1 0.0
<0.1
240
102
71.
67 2.5
<0.1 0.0
<0.1
820
100
122.
75 4.6
3.1
0.0
4.3
1,30
0 153.
51 4.6
3.3
0.0
7.7
98
_ _ -- -- -- -- --
Si
Tabl
e 15.--Taxa, numbers, and percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
sites
I and
2 in
Ken
ney
Reservoir, wa
ter
years
1985
-87-
-Con
tinu
ed
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cells
% Comp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Comp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) 1,
400
58.3
CENT
RALE
S 1,
300
54.2
Cy
clot
ella
bo
dani
ca
Cycl
otel
la ku
tzin
gian
aCyclotella me
negh
inia
na
28
1.2
Cyclotella ps
eudo
stel
lige
ra
Cycl
otel
la stelligera
Melo
sira
granulata
var.
angustissima
Melo
sira
italica
Melo
sira
li
rata
Me
losi
ra sp
. Rh
izos
olen
ia eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us al
pinu
s St
epha
nodi
scus
as
trea
St
epha
nodi
scus
ni
agar
ae
Step
hano
diso
us tenuis
Step
hano
disc
us sp.
1,300
54.2
PENNALES
56
2.3
Achnanthes affinis
Achnanthes lanceolata
Achn
anth
es mi
nuti
ssim
a Amphora
perp
usil
la
Amph
ora
vene
taAm
phor
a sp.
--
Asterionella formosa
Cocconeis
plac
entu
la
Cyli
ndro
thec
a gr
acil
is
Cyli
ndro
thec
a sp.
Cyma
topl
eura
so
lea
1,30
01,
300 28
Apri
l 24
, 19
86
92.9
92.9 2.0
1,30
0 92
.9
42
3.0
220 0
22.0
0.0
1,10
0 0100.0
0.0
220
22.4
1,10
0 10
3.6
110
10.0
Cymbella af
fini
sCymbella m
inuta
Cymbella m
inuta
f. 1 a
ten
sCymbella m
inuta
var. silesica
Cymbella si
nuat
aDiatoma
ance
psDiatoma
hiemale
var.
me
sodo
nDiatoma
tenu
e var. elongation
Diatoma
vulg
are
Diploneis
sp.
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Eunotia
sp.
Fragilar
ia capucina
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilar
ia p
innata
Fragilaria vaucheriae
Gomp
honema angustatum
Gyro
sigma
spencerii
Hannaea
arcu
sHannaea
arcu
s var. amphioxys
Hann
aea
arcu
s va
r. ar
cus
Hantzschia amphioxys
Meridion c
ircu
lare
Navi
cula
ar
vens
isNa
vicu
la capitata
Navi
cula
cryptocephala
Navi
cula
cryptocephala
var.
vene
taNa
vicu
la gastrum
Navicula h
eufi
eri
Navi
cula
la
nceo
lata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
men
iscu
lus
var.
up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la m
inima
Navi
cula
min
uscu
laNa
vicu
la mut
ica
Navi
cula
notha
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la p
upula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a var. teneJJa
230
20.9
575.7
230
20.9
110
11.0
281.2
575.
7
Tabl
e 15.--raxa, number
s , an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of
phytoplankton a
t si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenne
y Reservoir, wa
ter years
1985
-87-
-Con
tinued
rmvTTTM
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)
Kenney Res
ervo
ir (s
ite
2)rniJLUn
z "r-
« 77! ?; rr
2-ft
Co
mpos
ite
2-ft
Composite
r
dep
th
(0-1
0 ft
) dep
th
(0-1
0 ft
) us
sP
ecie
s C
ell
s %
Com
p C
ell
s %
Com
p C
ell
s %
Com
p C
ell
s %
Com
p
BA
CIL
LAR
IOPH
YTA
(D
IATO
MS)
-C
on
tin
ued
A
pri
l 24
> 1986-C
onti
nued
PEN
NA
LE
S-- C
onti
nued
JV
avic
uIa
rhy
nco
cep
hal
a N
avi
cula
sa
Jbin
ian
s v
ar.
in
term
edia
N
avi
cula
ta
ntu
la
Na
vicu
la tr
ipuncta
ta
Navi
cula
vir
idula
N
avi
cula
vir
idula
var.
av
eam
e
--
--
--
--
--
570
51.8
Navi
cula
vir
idula
var.
av
enac
eaJV
avic
ula
sp.
28
1.2
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a communis
14
1.0
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
Nitz
schi
a fi
lifo
rmis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
--
--
14
1.0
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ignorata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a linearis
Nitz
schi
a longissima v
ar.
reversa
Nitz
schi
a mi
croc
epha
laNi
tzsc
hia
pale
aNi
tzsc
hia pa
leac
ea
--
--
14
1.0
Nitz
schi
a pusilla
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
lis
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la v
ar.
debilis
Nitz
schi
a sp.
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curvata
Rhop
alod
ia m
usculus
Suri
rell
a angustata
Surirella
ovalis
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
deli
cati
ssim
aSy
nedr
a fa
scic
ulat
eSy
nedr
a mi
nusc
ula
Snye
dra
radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rumpens
var.
familiar is
Syne
dra
ulna
Synedra
ulna va
r. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna var. danica
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
oxyr
hync
hus
Syne
dra
sp.
Thal
assi
osir
a fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
Acti
nast
rum
hant
zsch
ii
Actinastrum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Anki
strode
smus
convolutus v.
acicularis
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r.acicularis
Ankistro
desmus fa
lcat
us va
r. mira
bili
s Carteria sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
Chlorella
sp.
Chlo
roco
ccum
hum
icol
a Ch
loro
cocc
um sp.
Chlo
rogo
nium
spirale
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chod
atel
la quadriseta
Closteri
um sp.
Coccomyxa minor
Crucigenia qu
adra
ta
850
35.4
846.
00.
00.
0
85 283.5
1.2
282.
0
Table
15.-
-Tax
a, numbers, an
d percent
comp
osit
ion
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 1985-87 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)Ke
nney
Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-
ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
Cells
% Comp
ON
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)--Continued
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
ehrenbergianum
Di
ctyo
spha
eriu
m pu
lche
llum
Di
ctyo
sphaerium
sp.
Gloeocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nkinia ra
diat
a Go
lenk
inio
psis
so
lita
ria
Gonium sp.
Kirchneriella
contorta
Nesotaenium
sp.
Micratinium pusillum
Micr
atin
ium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pandorina mo
rum
Phac
otus
lenticularis
Phacotus sp
. Platymonas sp
. Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
arma
tus
Scenedes
mus
biju
ga
Scen
edes
mus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schr
oede
ria
judayi
Schroederia
setigera
Selenastrum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schr
oete
ri
Staurastrum
sp.
TreuJbaria sp
.
740
30.8
April
24,
1986--Continued
28
2.0
28
2.0
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOL
DEN-
BROW
N ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Mall
omonas
acaroides
Mall
omonas
ak
roko
nos
Mall
omonas
gl
obos
a Ma
llom
onas
sp.
Pleu
rosigm
a delicatulum
Pleu
rosigm
a sp.
Ochr
omonas
sp.
CYANOPHYTA (B
LUE-
GREE
N AL
GAE)
Anabaena sp.
Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
limn
etic
us
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Da
ctyl
ococ
cops
is sp.
Lyngbya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Ma
rsso
niel
la elegans
Oscillatoria angusta
Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Oscillatoria limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
tenuis
Osci
llat
oria
sp.
Phormidium sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s li
near
e Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
Syne
chococ
cus
sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
chococ
cus
sp.
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)
Chro
omon
as sp
. Cr
ypto
mona
s er
osa
Cryptomonas
marsonii
Cryp
tomo
nas
ovat
a
28
1.2
42
3.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
28
1.2
14
1.0
28
2.0
28
1.2
0 0.0
800
80.0
0 0.0
28
1.2
230
23.0
570
57.0
110
4.6
85
3.5
14
1.0
0 0.
00
0.0
Tabl
e 15
.--T
axa,
numbers, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7--C
onti
nued
PHYL
UM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenn
ey R
eser
voir
(site
1)Ke
nney
Res
ervo
ir (site
2)2-ft
dept
hCo
mpos
ite
(0-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% C
omp
Cell
s % C
omp
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% C
omp
oo
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)--
Cont
inued
Cryptomo
nas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rati
form
is
Cryp
tomo
nas
sp.
Rhodomon
as mi
nuta
EUGLENOPHYTA (EUGLENOIDS)
Eugl
ena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Eugl
ena
sp.
Trachelomonas
sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Ceratium hir
undi
nell
a Gymnodinium
sp.
Peri
dinium biceps
Peridinium inconspicua
Peri
dinium sp
.
28 0
1.2
0.0
0.0
Apri
l 24
, 19
86--
Cont
inue
d
14
1.0
0 0.
00
0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
cell
s and
perc
ent
comp
osit
ion
Numb
er of
species
Dive
rsit
y in
dex
(DI)
at
species
leve
lBiomass
(mg/L
dry
weight)
Chlorophyll
a (|
Jg/L
)Chlorophyll
b (pg/L)
Chlorophyll
c (|
Jg/L
)
2,40
0 101
111.86 5.0
__ -- -_
__
1,40
0 103
111.
05 7.4
__ -- --
--
1,000
102
51.
77 1.4
__ -- --
1,100
100
41.
76 3.4
__ __ __
June
3, 1986
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIATOMS)
56
66.7
14
0 63
.6
320
100.
0 43
0 79.6
CENTRALES
0 0.0
0 0.0
85
26.6
57
10.6
Cyclotella bodanica
Cycl
otel
la ku
tzin
gian
aCy
clot
ella
meneghiniana
--
85
26.6
57
10.6
Cyclotella pseudostelligera
Cyclotella st
elli
gera
Me
losi
ra granulata
var.
an
gust
issi
ma
Melo
sira
italica
Melo
sira
lirata
Melo
sira
sp.
Rhiz
osol
enia
eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us alpinus
Step
hano
disc
us astrea
Step
hano
disc
us ni
agar
ae
Step
hano
disc
us tenuis
Stephanodi
scus
sp.
PENN
ALES
56
66.7
140
63.6
23
0 71.9
370
68.5
Achnanthes af
fini
s Achnanthes la
nceo
late
Achn
anth
es minutissima
28
33.3
28
12.7
Am
phor
a pe
rpus
illa
--
28
12.7
Amphora
vene
ta
Amph
ora
sp.
Asterionel
la formosa
--
--
--
--
--
--
170
31.5
Cocconeis
plac
entu
laCy
lind
roth
eca
grac
ilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
Cymbella affinis
Cymb
ella
min
uta
Cymbella minuta f.
la
tens
--
28
5.2
Cymb
ella
min
uta
var.
silesica
Cymb
ella si
nuat
aDiatoma
ance
psDiatoma
hiem
ale
var.
me
sodo
n
Tabl
e I5.--Taxa, numbers, an
d pe
rcen
t composition
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Ken
ney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)2-
ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
BACILLARIOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS) Continued
PENN
ALES
--Co
ntin
ued
Diatoma
tenue
var.
el
onga
tum
Diatoma
vulg
are
Dipl
oneis
sp.
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Eunotia
sp.
Fragilaria ca
puci
na
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
s Fragilaria pi
nnat
a Fragilar
ia vaucheriae
Gomphonema angustatum
Gyro
sigma
spen
ceri
i Hannaea
areas
Hann
aea
arcu
s var. amphioxys
Hann
aea
arcus
var. ar
cus
Hantzsch
ia amphioxys
Meridion circulare
Navi
cula
arvensis
Navi
cula
ca
pita
ta
Navi
cula
cryptocephala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var. ve
neta
. Na
vicu
la gastrum
Navi
cula h
eufi
eri
Navi
cula lanceolata
Navi
cula luzonensis
Navi
cula me
nisc
ulus
va
r. up
sali
ensi
s Na
vicu
la minima
Navi
cula
min
uscu
la
Navi
cula mu
tica
Na
vicu
la n
otha
June 3,
1986 Continued
57
17.8
28
12.7
288.
8
285.2
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la p
upula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la radiosa
var.
tenella
Navi
cula
rhyncocephala
Navi
cula
sa
bini
ans
var.
intermedia
Navi
cula
tantula
Navi
cula
tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la viridula
--
--
--
--
28
8.8
28
5.2
Navi
cula
viridula va
r. av
eame
Navi
cula viridula va
r. avenacea
Navi
cula
sp
.Ni
tzsc
hia
acicularis
--
--
--
85
26.6
Nitz
schia
communis
Nitz
schi
a dissipata
Nitz
schi
a fi
lifo
rmis
Nitz
schi
a frustulum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
--
28
8.8
57
10.6
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ig
nora
taNi
tzsc
hia
intermedia
28
33.3
57
25.9
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
isNi
tzsc
hia
longissima va
r. reversa
Nitz
schi
a mi
croc
epha
laNi
tzsc
hia
pale
a --
--
--
--
28
5.2
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNi
tzsc
hia
pusi
lla
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
lis
Nitz
schi
a tryblionella var. de
bili
sNi
tzsc
hia
sp.
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curvata
Rhop
alod
ia m
usculus
Suri
rell
a angustata
Suri
rella
ovalis
Suri
rella
ovata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
deli
cati
ssim
a
Tabl
e 15
.--T
axa,
numbers, and percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enne
y Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYL
UM
ORDE
RGe
nus
species
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-10
ft)
___
Cell
s % Comp
Cell
s
Kenney Reservoir (site
2)2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
BACILLARIOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
) Co
ntin
ued
PENN
ALES
--Co
ntin
ued
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
a Sn
yedr
a radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rumpens
var.
familiaris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
contracta
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
dani
ca
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
oxyr
hync
hus
Syne
dra
sp.
Thal
assi
osir
a fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE
) Actinastrum ha
ntzs
chii
Actinastrum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Ankistrodesmus convolutus v.
acicul
aris
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r.ac
icul
aris
Anki
stro
desm
us fa
lcat
us va
r. mirabilis
Carteria sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
Chlo
rell
a sp.
Chlo
roco
ccum
hum
icol
a Ch
loro
cocc
um sp
. Ch
loro
goni
um s
pira
le
June
3, 19
86--
Cont
inue
d
285.2
2833.3
2812
.70.
011
0110
20.4
20.4
2833
.3
2812
.7
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chodatella
quadriseta
Closterium sp
. Coccomyxa
minor
Crucigenia quadrata
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
ehrenbergianum
Dictyosphaerium pulchellum
Dict
yosphaerium
sp.
Gloeocysti
s sp.
Golenkinia
radiata
Gole
nkin
iops
is solitaria
Goni
um sp.
Kirchneriella
cont
orta
Mesotaenium
sp.
Micratinium pusillum
Micratinium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pandorina
moru
m Phacotus lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Platymon
as sp
. Pteromonas sp.
Scenedes
mus
armatus
Scenedes
mus
biju
ga
Scenedes
mus
dimorphus
Scenedes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scenedesmu
s serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schr
oede
ria
juda
yi
Schr
oede
ria
setigera
Selenastrum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treubaria
sp.
Tabl
e 15.--raxa, nu
mber
s, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of
phytoplan
kton
at
sites
1 and
2 in K
enne
y Reservoir, wa
ter
years
1985
-87-
-Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)Ke
nney
Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft)
depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Mallomonas acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Mallomonas sp.
Pleurosigma
deli
catu
lum
Pleurosigma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYAN
OPHY
TA (B
LUE-
GREE
N AL
GAE)
Anabaena sp
.Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
Aphanoca
psa
sp.
Aphanoth
ece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dactyloc
occopsis fascicularis
Dactyloc
occopsis sp.
Lyngbya
limn
etic
a Lyngbya
nana
Marssoniella elegans
Oscillatoria angusta
Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Oscillatoria tenuis
Osci
llat
oria
sp.
0.0
June
3, 1986--Continued
0 0.0
0 0.
00.0
0.0
5725
.90.
00.0
Phormidi
um sp.
Synechococcus
lineare
--
57
25.9
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Synechococcus
sp.
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Chroomonas sp.
Cryp
tomo
nas
eros
a Cr
ypto
mona
s marsonii
Cryp
tomo
nas
ovat
a Cr
ypto
mona
s rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rati
form
is
Cryptomo
nas
sp.
Rhodomonas mi
nuta
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)
0 0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 Eu
glen
a ac
us
Eugl
ena
viri
dis
EugJ
ena
sp.
Trachelomonas
sp.
PYRR
HOPH
YTA
(DIN
OFLA
GELL
ATES
) 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.0
Cera
tium
hirundinella
Gymnodin
ium
sp.
Peridinium bic
eps
Peridini
um in
cons
picu
a Peridini
um sp.
Tota
l ce
lls
and
perc
ent
comp
osit
ion
84
100
220
102
320
100
540
100
Number of
species
3 6
6
9Diversity index
(DI) at species
leve
l 1.58
--
2.50
--
2.41
--
2.80
Biomass (mg/
L dry
weight)
14.7
10.6
9.4
25.8
Chlorophyll a
(|Jg/L)
Chlorophyll b (p
g/L)
Chlorophyll c
(|Jg/L)
Tabl
e 15
.--T
axa,
numbers, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phy
topl
ankt
on at si
tes
1 and
2 in Ke
nney
Res
ervo
ir,
water
year
s 1985-87--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
)CE
NTRA
LES
Cyclotella bo
dani
caCy
clot
ella
kutzingiana
Cycl
otel
la m
eneghiniana
Cycl
otel
la p
seud
oste
llig
era
Cycl
otel
la st
elli
gera
Melo
sira
gra
nula
ta v
ar.
angu
stis
sima
Melo
sira
italica
Melo
sira
lirata
Melo
sira
sp.
Rhizosolenia eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us alpinus
Step
hano
disc
us as
trea
Step
hano
disc
us ni
agar
aeSt
epha
nodi
scus
te
nuis
Step
hano
disc
us sp.
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
dept
hCe
lls
% Comp
310
14.8
110
5.4
__ __ 85
4.0
__ -- __ __ __ __ __ __ __ 28
1.3
__ --
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Comp
June
24
,
260
14.4
57
3.2
-- -- 57
3.2
-- -- -- _- _- -- -- __ -- -- --
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s
1986 350 99 -- -- 85 -- 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
% Co
mp
92.1
26.1 -- --
22.4 -- 3.7
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s
550
128 -- -- 43 -- -- -- -- 85 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
% Co
mp
94.8
22.1 -- -- 7.4
-- -- -- -- 14.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
PENN
ALES
Achnanthes affinis
Achn
anth
es lanceolata
Achn
anth
es minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amph
ora
veneta
Amphora
sp.
Asterionella fo
rmos
a Cocconeis
plac
entu
la
Cylindrotheca
grac
ilis
Cy
lind
roth
eca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
200
9.5
200 57 28
11.1
3.2
1.6
250 14
65.8
3.7
420 14
72.4 2.4
Cymbella affinis
Cymbella m
inuta
Cymbella m
inuta
f. la
tens
Cywbella m
inut
a va
n. silesica
Cymbella sinuata
Diat
oma
ance
psDi
atom
a hiemale
var.
mesodon
Diat
oma
tenu
e va
r. elongation
Diat
oma
vulg
are
Diploneis
sp.
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Euno
tia
sp.
Fragilaria ca
puci
naFragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria p
inna
taFr
agil
aria
va
uche
riae
Gomphonema angustatum
Gyrosigma
spencerii
Hann
aea
arcu
sHa
nnae
a arcus
var.
am
phio
xys
Hann
aea
arcus
var.
arcus
Hantzschia am
phio
xys
Meri
dion
circulare
Navi
cula arvensis
Navi
cula capitata
Navi
cula cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var. veneta
Navi
cula gastrum
Navi
cula
heu
fler
iNa
vicu
la la
nceo
lata
Navi
cula
lu
zone
nsis
Navi
cula
menisculus va
r. up
saliensis
Navi
cula
minima
Navi
cula
min
uscu
laNa
vicu
la mu
tica
Navi
cula no
tha
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la p
upul
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a va
r. te
nell
a
281.3
14 14
3.7
3.7
260
44.8
14 14 14
3.7
3.7
3.7
14 14
2.4
2.4
Tabl
e 15.--ra.xa/
numb
ers,
and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, water
year
s 1985-87-
-Conti
nued
.
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
species
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Comp
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Comp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS)-Continued
June
24
' 1986-Continued
PENNALES--
Cont
inue
d Navicula rhyncocephala
Wavi
qula
saMnians var. in
termedia
Wavicula tantula
Navi
cula
tr
ipun
ctat
a Wavicula vi
ridu
la
Navicula vi
ridu
la va
r. av
eame
Navi
cula
viridula v
ar.
avenacea
--
--
14
3.7
28
4.8
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
m
Nitz
schi
a co
mmun
is00
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schi
a frustulum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
57
2.7
57
3.2
57
15.0
28
4.8
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ig
nora
ta
--
--
--
--
--
14
2.4
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
28
1.3
57
3.2
28
7.4
28
4.8
Nitz
schi
a la
tens
Nitz
schi
a linearis
Nitz
schi
a longissima v
ar.
reversa
Nitz
schi
a mi
croc
epha
laNi
tzsc
hia
pale
a 28
1.3
~
~
14
3.7
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNi
tzsc
hia
pusilla
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
--
--
14
3.7
14
2.4
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
lis
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la v
ar.
debi
lis
Nitz
schi
a sp.
--
--
--
--
14
3.7
Pleu
rosi
gma
deli
cata
lum
Rhoi
cosp
heni
a curvata
Rhopalodia mu
scul
usSurirella
angustata
Surirella
oval
isSu
rire
lla
ovat
a
-
14
3.7
14
2.4
Syne
dra
acus
Synedra
deli
cati
ssim
aSy
nedr
a fa
scic
ulat
eSy
nedr
a mi
nusc
ula
Snye
dra
radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
var.
familiaris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna
va
r. danica
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
oxyr
hync
hus
57
2.7
14
3.7
Syne
dra
sp.
Thal
assi
osir
a fl
uvia
tili
s
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
1,700
81.0
1,500
83.3
0
0.0
28
4.8
Actinast
rum ha
ntzs
chii
Actinast
rum
sp.
Anki
strode
smus
co
nvol
utus
An
kist
rodesm
us co
nvol
utus
v.
acicularis
Anki
stro
desm
us fa
lcat
us
Ankistrodesmus falcatus var.
acicularis
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us var. mi
rabi
lis
Carteria sp
.Ch
lamy
domo
nas
sp.
110
5.2
57
3.2
Chlorella
sp.
Chlo
roco
ccum
hum
icol
a Chlorococcum sp.
Chlo
rogo
nium
spi
rale
Ch
loro
goni
um sp.
Chod
atella
quadriseta
Closterium sp
. Coccomyxa mi
nor
Crucigenia
qu
adra
ta
Tabl
e 15.--Taxa, numbers, and percent
composition
of p
hytoplanJfcton at
sites
1 an
d 2
in Ken
ney
Rese
rvoi
r , wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7- -Contin
ued
PHYLUM
f\DT^T?'D
\JS\jJ S^
S\.
Genu
s species
Kenney R
eser
voir
(s
ite
1)2-
ft
Composite
dept
h (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% Co
mp
Kenney R
eser
voir
(s
ite
2)2-
ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% C
omp
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN A
LGAE) --
Cont
inue
d Di
ctyo
sphaerium
ehre
nJbe
rgia
num
Dict
yosp
haer
ium pulchellum
Dictyosphaerium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
GoJenJtinia
radiata
GoJe
nkin
iops
is so
Jita
ria
Goni
um sp.
Kirchneriella
cont
orta
Wesotaeniian s
p.
Wicr
atin
iian pus
illu
m Wi
crat
iniu
m sp.
Moug
eotia
sp.
Oocytis
sp.
Pandorina
morum
Phacotus Jenticularis
Phacotus sp.
PJatymonas sp.
Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
arma
tus
Scenedes
mus
bijuga
Scen
edes
mus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schr
oede
ria
judayi
Schroede
ria
seti
gera
SeJenastrum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurast
rum
sp.
Treubaria
sp.
June
1986-Continued
284.8
1,60
076.2
1,40
077.8
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOL
DEN-
BROW
N ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Mallomonas acaroides
Mall
omon
as ak
roko
nos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Ma
llom
onas
sp.
Pleurosigma
delicatulum
Pleu
rosi
gma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYAN
OPHY
TA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
Ana&aena sp
.Ap
hano
caps
a delicatissima
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
dispersus
Chroococ
cus
limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Dactylococcopsis sp.
Lyngbya
limnetica
Lyng
bya
nana
Marssoniella elegans
Osci
llat
oria
an
gust
a Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Oscillatoria li
mnet
ica
Oscillatoria te
nuis
Oscillatoria sp.
Phormidium sp
. Sy
nech
ococ
cus
lineare
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mino
r Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sp.
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
Chroomonas sp.
Cryptomo
nas
eros
a Cryptomo
nas
mars
onii
Cr
ypto
mona
s ov
ata
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
143.7
0.0
143.7
572.
70.0
143.
70.0
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numb
ers,
and percent
composition
of p
hi/toplankto
n at
sites
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Reservoir, water
years
19S5-S7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
2-ft
Comp
osit
edepth
(0-1
0 ft
) depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S) C
ontinu
ed
Cryp
tomo
nas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rati
form
is
Cryp
tomo
nas
sp.
Rhodomonas minuta
EUGLENOPHYTA
(E
UGLE
NOID
S)
Euglena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
Trache1o
mona
s sp.
PYRR
HOPH
YTA
(DIN
OFLA
GELL
ATES
) Ce
rati
um hirundinella
Gymnodinium
sp.
Peridiniim biceps
Peridini
im in
cons
picu
a Peridini
im sp.
57
0
2.7
0.0
0.0
June 24,
1986 Continued
14
0.0
3.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
cell
s an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n
Number of species
Diversity
inde
x (D
I) at species
leve
lBiomass
(mg/
L dry
weight)
Chlorophyll
a (pg/D
Chlorophyll
b (|
Jg/L
)Ch
loro
phyl
l c
(|Jg/L)
2,10
0 98
10 1.48 7.8
-- --
--
1,80
0 98
71.17
11.5 -- --
--
380
99
183.
8012.2 _- --
580 13
2.83
18.0 -- --
100 __ -- -- --
July
22,
1986
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
) 3,500
44.9
5,300
35.3
960
38.4
1,20
0 31
.6
CENTRALES
3,40
0 43
.6
5,100
34.0
88
0 35
.2
950
25.0
Cy
clot
ella
bo
dani
ca
Cycl
etel
la ku
tzin
gian
a Cy
clot
ella
me
negh
inia
naCyclotella ps
eudo
stel
lige
ra
3,200
41.0
4,40
0 29
.3
710
28.4
730
19.2
Cyclotella stelligera
Melo
sira gr
anul
ata
var.
an
gust
issi
ma
Melo
sira it
alic
aMe
losi
ra li
rata
11
0.
1 Me
losi
ra sp.
Rhiz
osol
enia
eriensis
Step
hanodi
scus
alpinus
Step
hanodi
scus
astrea
Stephanodiscus ni
agar
ae
--
--
--
--
110
2.9
Stephanodiscus te
nuis
14
0 1.
8 710
4.7
170
6.8
110
2.9
Stephanodiscus sp
.
PENN
ALES
14
0 1.
8 200
1.3
85
3.4
250
6.6
Achnanthes af
fini
sAchnanthes lanceolata
--
28
0.7
Achn
anth
es minutissima
Amph
ora
perpusilla
Amphora
vene
ta
Amph
ora
sp.
Asterionella formosa
Cocconeis
plac
entu
la
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura solea
Cymbella af
fini
s Cymbella m
inuta
Cymbella m
inuta
f. la
tens
Cymbella m
inut
a var. si
lesi
ca
Cymbella sinuata
Diat
oma
ance
ps
Diat
oma
hiemale
var. mesodon
Table
l5.--Taxa, nu
mber
s, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phytoplankt
on at
sites
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7--Conti
nued
PHVT
TTM
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Ke
nney
Reservoir (s
ite
2)ORDFR
2-ft
Co
mpos
ite
2-ft
Composite
UK}JJ
J|K
. de
pth
(0-1
0 ft)
dept
h (0
-10
ft)
us sP
ecie
s Ce
lls
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIATOMS)--Continued
Jul?
22> 1986-Continued
PENNALES--Continued
Diatoma
tenue
var.
el
onga
tum
Diatoma
vulg
are
Diplonei
s sp
. --
--
28
0.2
Epit
hemia
sore
xEunotia
sp.
Frag
ilaria
capucina
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria p
inna
taFragilaria va
uche
riae
Gomphonema angustatum
Gyrosigma
spencerii
Hann
aea
arcus
Hann
aea
arcus
var. am
phio
xys
Hann
aea
arcus
var.
ar
cus
Hantzschia amphioxys
--
--
--
--
--
--
28
0.7
Meridion c
irculare
Navi
cula
arvensis
Navi
cula
capitata
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var. ve
neta
Navi
cula
ga
stru
mNa
vicu
la heufleri
Navi
cula
lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
menisculus
var. up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la mi
nima
Navi
cula
minuscula
85
1.1
14
0.1
--
--
28
0.7
Navi
cula
mu
tica
Na
vicu
la n
otha
ON
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la pu
pula
Navi
cula
radios a
Navi
cula
ra
dios
a var. te
nell
aNa
vicu
la rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navicula sabinians
var.
intermedia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
aNa
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la viridula
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
meNa
vicu
la viridula v
ar.
aven
acea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a communis
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
Nitz
schi
a fi
lifo
rmis
Nitz
schi
a frustulum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
naNi
tzsc
hia
hung
aric
aNi
tzsc
hia
igno
rata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
isNi
tzsc
hia
longissima v
ar.
reversa
Nitz
schi
a mi
croc
epha
laNi
tzsc
hia
pale
aNi
tzsc
hia
pale
acea
Nitz
schi
a pusilla
Nitz
schi
a romana
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
l is
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la v
ar.
debi
lis
Nitz
schi
a sp
.PI
eurosigma delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curv
ata
Rhop
alodia
musculus
Suri
rell
a angustata
Suri
rell
a ov
al is
Suri
rell
a ovata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
571.5
570.
785 14
0.6
0.1
28
0.7
28
0.7
280.7
280.2
853.4
28
0.7
Tabl
e 15
.--T
axa,
nu
mber
s, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of
phy
topl
ankt
on at
sites
2 and
2 in
Kenney R
eservoir,
water
year
s 19
85-8
7--C
ontinu
ed
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Comp
BACILLARIOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS) Continued
PENN
ALES
--Co
ntin
ued
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Synedra
minu
scul
a Sn
yedr
a radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
var.
fa
mili
aris
Sy
nedr
a ulna
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
contracta
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
dani
ca
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
oxyrhynchus
Syne
dra
sp.
Thal
assi
osir
a fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE
) Ac
tina
stru
m hantzschii
Acti
nast
rum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Ankistrodesmus convolutus v.
acicul
aris
An£i
stro
desm
us fa
lcat
us
Anki
stro
desmus falcatus va
r.acicul
aris
An
/ris
trodesmus
faJcatus var.
mira
bili
s Carteria sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
Chlo
rell
a sp.
Chlo
roco
ccum
hum
icol
a Ch
loro
cocc
um sp.
Chlo
rogo
nium
spi
rale
July
22
, 19
86--
Cont
inue
d
280.
2
2,900
37.2
6,300
42.0
740
9.5
170
1.1
-- 85 280 85
-- 1.1
3.6
1.1
28 110
110
140
110
0.2
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.7
1,20
0 48
.0
1,70
0 44.7
280 28
170
6.8
28 57 110 28
430
7.4
0.7
0.7
1.5
2.9
0.7
11.3
280.2
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp
. Ch
odat
ella
quadriseta
Closterium sp.
Coccomyxa
mino
r Crucigenia quadrata
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
ehrenbergianum
Di
ctyo
sphaerium pulchellum
Dict
yosphaerium
sp.
Gloeocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nkinia
radiata
Golenkin
iops
is solitaria
Gonium sp.
Kirchneriella
contorta
Meso
taen
ium
sp.
Micr
atin
ium pusillum
Micratinium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pand
orin
a mo
rum
Phacotus lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Platymonas sp.
Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
armatus
Scen
edes
mus
biju
ga
Scenedesmu
s dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scen
edes
mus
serr
atus
Sc
ened
esmu
s sp.
Schr
oede
ria
judayi
Schr
oede
ria
seti
gera
Selenastrum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
TreiLbaria sp.
110
0.7
200
1.3
650
4.3
28
0.2
1,60
0 20
.5
3,500
23.3
28
0.2
910
6.1
110
1.4
230
9.2
28
0.7
170
4.5
28
0.7
800
32.0
450
11.8
28
1.1
85
2.2
170
1.1
Tabl
e 15.--raxa, numbers, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of p
hyto
plan
kton
at
sites
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Reservoir, water
years
1985
-87-
-Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
2-ft
dept
hComposite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
ON
00
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOL
DEN-
BROW
N ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Mallomonas ac
aroi
des
Mall
omon
as ak
roko
nos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Mallomonas sp.
Pleurosigma
delicatulum
Pleurosigma
sp.
Ochr
omon
as sp.
CYANOPHYTA (B
LUE-
GREE
N AL
GAE)
Anabaena sp
.Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
dispersus
Chroococ
cus
limn
etic
us
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dactylococcopsis fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp
. Ly
ngby
a limnetica
Lyng
bya
nana
Ma
rsso
niel
la elegans
Osci
llat
oria
angusta
Osci
llat
oria
an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
te
nuis
Os
cill
ator
ia sp
.
85 85 620 85
1.1
1.1
1,10
0 14.1 7.9
1.1
July
22
, 19
86--
Cont
inue
d
85
0.6
0 0.
0
57 340
510
0.4
2.3
3.4
281.
1
280
11.2
57 230
290
0.0
3
28
,700 110
620
910 57
0.
24. 0. 4.
6.
0.
2 7 7 1 1 4
-- 310
12.4
810
230
_-
--
21.3 6.1
-- 1.5
6.1
7.6
Phor
midi
um sp.
Synechococcus
lineare
Synechococcus
sigmoidea
430
5.5
170
1.1
Syne
choc
occu
s si
gmoi
dea
f. mi
nor
830
5.5
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
110
0.7
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)
110
1.4
28
0.2
28
1.1
28
0.7
Chroomonas sp
. Cr
ypto
mona
s er
osa
Cryp
tomo
nas
mars
onii
--
28
0.2
28
1.1
28
0.7
Cryp
tomo
nas
ovat
a Cr
ypto
mona
s rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rostratiformis
Cryp
tomo
nas
sp.
28
0.4
Rhodomon
as mi
nuta
85
1.
1
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)
0 0.
0 28
0.2
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Euglena
acus
28
0.2
Euglena
viridis
Euglena
sp.
--
57
0.6
rrachelo
mona
s sp.
PYRR
HOPH
YTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
85
1.1
0 0.0
0 0.
0 28
0.
7 Ceratium
hir
undi
nell
a Gymnodin
ium
sp.
Peridini
um bic
eps
Peridini
um i
nconspicua
Peridini
um sp.
Total
cell
s and
percent
composition
Number of
sp
ecie
sDi
vers
ity
inde
x (D
I) at
sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biomass
(mg/
L dry
weig
ht)
Chlorophyll
a (|
Jg/L
)Ch
loro
phyl
l b
(|Jg
/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
c (|
Jg/L
)
85
1.1
7,80
0 10
0
182.79 1.2
5.3
2.1
10.9
__
15,000
103
363.
54 0.8
5.7
1.8
1.6
__
2,50
0 10
0
102.61
21.8 __ --
--
--
3,800 29
4.01
12.4 3.7
2.9
2.0
--
99
__ -- -- -- --
Tabl
e 15
.--T
axa,
nu
mber
s, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of
phytoplankton at
sit
es 1
and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
years
1985
-87-
-Con
tinu
ed
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Comp
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
) CENTRALES
Cycl
otel
la bo
dani
caCy
clot
ella
kutzingiana
Cyclotella meneghiniana
Cyclotella pseudostelligera
Cycl
otel
la stelligera
Melosira granulata
var.
angustissima
Melo
sira
italica
Melo
sira
lirata
Melo
sira
sp.
Rhizosolenia eriensis
Step
hano
dlsc
us a-
Zpin
usStephanodlscus as
trea
Stephanodlscus ni
agar
aeStephanodlscus tenuis
Stephanodlscus sp.
PENN
ALES
Achn
anth
es affinis
Achn
anth
es lanceolata
Achnanthes minutissima
Amph
ora
perp
usil
la
Amphora
veneta
Amphora
sp.
Asterionella formosa
Cocconeis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
400
400 19 38 340
25.0
25.0 1.2
2.4
21.3 0.0
August 20,
1986
340
310 14
300
21.3
19.4 0.9
18.8
340 28 28
91.9
7.6
7.6
870
110
110
58.0
7.3
7.3
281.8
310
83.8
760 57
50.7 3.8
Cymbella affinis
Cymbella m
inut
aCymbella mi
nuta
f. latens
Cymbella m
inut
a va
r. silesica
Cymb
ella
si
nuat
aDiatoma
anceps
Diatoma
hiemale
var.
mesodon
Diatoma
tenue
var.
elongation
Diatoma
vulg
are
Dipl
oneis
sp.
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Eunotia
sp.
Fragilaria ca
puci
naFragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pinnata
Fragilar
ia va
uche
riae
Gomphonema angustatum
Gyrosigma
spencerii
Hannaea
arcus
Hannaea
arcus
var.
amphioxys
Hannaea
arcus
var.
arcus
Hantzsch
ia amphioxys
Meri
dion
circulare
Navi
cula
arvensis
Navi
cula
ca
pita
taNa
vicu
la cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
Navi
cula
gastrum
Navi
cula
heufieri
Navi
cula
la
nceo
lata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
men
iscu
lus
var.
up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la m
inim
aNa
vicu
la mi
nusc
ula
Navi
cula
mu
tica
Navi
cula
not
haNa
vicu
la p
elli
cosa
Navi
cula
pup
ula
Navi
cula
radiosa
Navi
cula
ra
dios
a va
r. tenella
140
37.8
573.
8
2814
0.9
143.
7
28 14
28 28
7.6
7.6
57 57 28
1.9
280
18.7 1.9
2.4
3.8
3.8
1.9
Table
15.--raxa, numbers, and percent
composition
of phytoplankt
on at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir/ wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
-vj ro
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
PENN
ALES
Con
tinu
ed
Navi
cula
rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var.
in
termedia
Navi
cula
tantula
Navi
cula tr
ipun
ctat
a Na
vicu
la vi
ridu
la
Navi
cula vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
me
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avenacea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a communis
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
Nitz
schi
a fi
lifo
rmis
Ni
tzsc
hia
frus
tulu
m Ni
tzsc
hia
hantzschiana
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ignorata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a 2atens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
is
Nitz
schi
a longissima v
ar.
reversa
Nitz
schi
a microcephala
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
ea
Nitz
schi
a pu
sill
a Ni
tzsc
hia
roma
na
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
l is
Ni
tzsc
hia
tryb
lion
ella
var
. debilis
Nitz
schi
a sp.
August 20,
1986--Continued
28 571.
9 3.
8
287.6
287.
6
57
15.4
28 28
1.9
1.9
Pleurosigma
delicatalum
Rhoi
cosphe
nia
curv
ata
Rhop
alodia
musculus
Suri
rella
angustata
Surirella
ovalis
Suri
rella
ovata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
deli
cati
ssim
aSy
nedr
a fa
scic
ulat
eSy
nedr
a mi
nusc
ula
Snye
dra
radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rumpens
var.
familiaris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna
var.
dani
caSy
nedr
a ul
na va
r. ox
yrhy
nchu
sSy
nedr
a sp.
Thal
assios
ira
fluviatilis
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
Actinastrum hantzschii
Actinastrum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Anki
stro
desm
us convolutus v.
acicularis
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us
Ankistro
desmus falcatus var.
acicularis
Ankistro
desmus falcatus var. mi
rabi
lis
Cart
eria
sp
. Ch
lamy
domo
nas
sp.
Chlo
rella
sp.
Chlorococcum hum
icol
a Chlorococcum sp.
Chlo
rogonium spirale
Chlorogonium s
p.
Chodatella quadriseta
Clos
terium sp.
Cocc
omyx
a mi
nor
Crucigenia quadrata
140.9
281.
9
230
14.4
500
31.3
0.0
0.0
191.
213
0 43
8.1
2.7
Table
15.--raxa, numbers
t an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankton at
sit
es 1
and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7--C
onti
nued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cell
s % Comp
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)--Continued
Dict
yosphaerium
ehrenbergianum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium pulchellum
Dictyosphaerium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nkinia
radiata
Gole
nkin
iops
is solitaria
Gonium s
p.Kirchneriella
cont
orta
Mesotaenium
sp.
Micr
atin
ium
pus ilium
Micratinium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pand
orina
mo rum
Ph
acot
us lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Platymonas sp
. Pteromonas sp
. Scenedesmu
s armatus
Scen
edes
mus
biju
ga
Scenedes
mus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quadricauda
Scenedes
mus
serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schroederia
judayi
Schr
oederi
a se
tige
ra
Selenastrum minutum
Spha
eroc
ysti
s schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treubaria
sp.
August 20
, 1986--Continued
284.8
210
13.1
330
20.6
CHRYSOPHYTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Kephyrion
sp.
Mall
omon
as acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Mallomonas sp.
Pleurosigma
delicatulum
Pleurosigma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYANOPHYTA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
Anab
aena
sp
.Aphanoca
psa
deli
cati
ssim
a Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanoth
ece
sp.
Chroococcu
s dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
limneticus
Chroococcu
s sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyngbya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Mars
soni
ella
elegans
Osci
llat
oria
an
gust
a Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Oscillatoria tenuis
Oscillatoria sp
. Phormidium sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s li
near
e Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s si
gmoi
dea
f. mi
nor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
Chroomonas
sp.
Cryp
tomo
nas
eros
a Cr
ypto
mona
s ma
rson
ii
Cryp
tomo
nas
ovat
a
300
280 19
250
250
400 19
360
18.8
17.5 1.2
15.6
15.6
25.0 1.2
22.5
350
280 71 28 28 310
200
21.9
17.5 4.4
0.0
0.0
1.8
1.8
19.4
12.5
0.0
620
41.3
620
41.3
0.0
0.0
Tabl
e l5.--Taxa
f numbers, an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of
phytoplankton at s
ites 1
and
2 in
Kenne
i/ Res
ervo
ir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7- -Co
ntinued
o\
PHYLUM
rVDTOTP
UKUliiK
Genus
spec
ies
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S ) -
-Continued
Cryp
tomo
nas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
ra tiformis
Cryp
tomo
nas
sp.
Rhod
omon
as m
inut
a
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)Eu
glen
a ac
usEuglena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
rrac
helo
mona
s sp.
PYRR
HOPH
YTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Ceratium hirundinella
Gymn
odin
ium
sp.
Peri
dinium bic
eps
Peridinium i
nconspicua
Peridinium sp.
Total
cell
s and
percent
composition
Number of
sp
ecie
sDi
versity
inde
x (D
I) at species
leve
lBi
omass
(mg/
L dr
y weight)
Chlo
roph
yll
a (|
Jg/L
)Ch
loro
phyl
l Jb
(pg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
c (pg/L)
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-ft
depth
Cells
% Co
mp
-- -- 19
1.2
-- 0 0.
0-- -- --
0 0.0
__ -- -- -- __
__
1,60
0 99
112.73 3.3
2.0
0.0
0.0
Comp
osit
e(0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
August 20,
-- -- 43
2.7
71
4.4
0 0.
0-- -- --
28
1.8
__ -- -- 28
1.8
__
__
1,60
0 97
143.13 3.4
2.0
0.0
0.0
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
depth
Cells
% Comp
1986--Continued
-- -- ----
28
7.6
-- -- 28
7.6
0 0.0
__ -- -- -- --
--
370
99
82.65
18.0 __ -- --
--
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Comp
-- -- --
0 0.0
-- -- --
__
__
-- -- -- --
--
1,50
0 99
152.
91 3.8 __ -- --
--
Sept
embe
r 16,
1986
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) 28
3.
5 18
0 23
.1
620
68.9
520
89.7
CENT
RALE
S 14
1.
8 71
9.1
28
3.1
57
9.8
Cycl
otel
la bo
dani
ca
Cycl
otel
la kutzingiana
Cyclotella me
negh
inia
na
--
--
28
3.6
Cyclotella ps
eudo
stel
lige
raCy
clot
ella
st
elli
gera
--
43
5.5
28
3.1
57
9.8
Melo
sira
granulata
var.
an
gust
issi
ma
Melo
sira
it
alic
a Me
losi
ra li
rata
Me
losi
ra sp.
Rhizosolenia er
iens
is
Stephanodiscus al
pinu
s Stephanodiscus as
trea
Stephanodiscus ni
agar
ae
Stephanodiscus tenuis
Stephanodiscus sp
. 14
1.8
PENNALES
14
1.8
110
14.1
590
65.6
46
0 79
.3
Achnanthes af
fini
s Achnanthes lanceolata
Achnanthes minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
vene
ta
Amphora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
fo
rmos
a Cocconeis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
Cymb
ella
af
fini
s Cymbella m
inuta
Cymbella m
inuta
f. Jatens
Cymb
ella
minuta
var.
silesica
Cymb
ella
si
nuat
a Diatoma
ance
ps
Diatoma
hiemale
var. me
sodo
n
Tabl
e 15.--Taxa, numbers, and percent
comp
osit
ion
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
sites
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Rese
rvoi
r, water
year
s 1985-87- -Continued
m?r»FT?
r .
benu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenn
ey Res
ervo
ir (s
ite
1)Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Cells
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) -Continued
PENNALES- -C
onti
nued
Diat
oma
tenue
var.
el
onga
tum
Diat
oma
vulg
are
Dipl
onei
s sp.
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Eunotia
sp.
Fragilaria
capucina
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pinnata
Fragilaria vaucheriae
Gomphonema
angustatum
Gyro
sigma
spencerii
Hannaea
arcus
Hannaea
arcus
var.
amphioxys
Hannaea
arcus
var.
arcus
Hantzschia
amphioxys
Meri
dion
circulare
Navi
cula
arvensis
Navi
cula
capitata
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cryptocephala
var.
ve
neta
Navi
cula
ga
stru
mNa
vicu
la h
eufl
eri
Navicula lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
me
nisc
ulus
va
r. up
saliensis
Navi
cula
mi
nima
Navi
cula mi
nusc
ula
Navicula m
utica
Navi
cula
not
ha
Sept
embe
r 16,
1986-Continued
141.
8
577.3
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la pupula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la ra
dios
a va
r. tenella
Navi
cula
rhyncocephala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var.
intermedia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
aNa
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la vi
ridu
laNa
vicu
la vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
meNa
vicu
la v
irid
ula
var.
av
enac
eaNa
vicu
la sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a communis
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
Nitz
schi
a hantzschiana
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ignorata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
isNi
tzsc
hia
long
issi
ma v
ar.
reve
rsa
Nitz
schi
a microcephala
Nitz
schi
a palea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNi
tzsc
hia
pusi
lla
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
Nitz
schi
a thermal is
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la v
ar.
debi
lis
Nitz
schi
a sp
.Pleurosigma
delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curv
ata
Rhop
alod
ia m
uscu
lus
Surirella
angu
stat
aSu
rire
lla
oval
isSu
rire
lla
ovata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
deli
cati
ssim
a
310
34.4
230
39.7
14 14
1.8
1.8
576.
3
57
6.3
28
3.1
283.6
140
15.6
140
24.1
579.
8
284.
8
Tabl
e 15
.--r
a.xa
, numbers, an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of
phytoplankt
on at
si
tes
I an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19S5-S7--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
species
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
oo
o
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
PENNALES--
Continued
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
a Sn
yedr
a ra
dien
s Sy
nedr
a nunpens
Syne
dra
rumpens
var.
familiaris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna va
r. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
dani
ca
Syne
dra
ulna va
r. ox
yrhy
nchu
s Sy
nedr
a sp.
Thal
assi
osir
a fl
uvia
tili
s
CHLOROPHYTA
(GRE
EN A
LGAE)
Acti
nast
rum hantzschii
Actinastrum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Ankistrodesmus co
nvol
utus
v.
acic
ular
isAnkistrodesmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us var.
acic
ular
isAnkistrodesmus falcatus va
r. mi
rabi
lis
Carteria sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
Chlo
rella
sp.
Chlo
roco
ccum
hum
icol
a Ch
loro
coccum sp.
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp
iral
e
Sept
embe
r 16,
1986--Continued
260
32.5
270
34.6
0.0
284.
8
141.
8
435.
414
1.8
00
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chodatella guadriseta
Closterium
sp.
Cocc
omyx
a minor
Crucigenia qu
adra
ta
Dict
yosphaerium
ehrenbergianum
Di
ctyo
sphaerium pulchellum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
sp.
Gloeocysti
s sp.
Gole
nkinia
radiata
Gole
nkin
iops
is solitaria
Goni
um sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a contorta
Meso
taen
ium
sp.
Micr
atin
ium
pus ilium
Micr
atin
ium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pand
orina
moru
m Ph
acot
us lenticularis
Phac
otus
sp
. Platymonas
sp.
Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edesmu
s armatus
Scenedesmus
bijuga
Scen
edesmu
s dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scen
edes
mus
serr
atus
Scenedesmu
s sp
. Sc
hroe
deri
a ju
dayi
Sc
hroe
deri
a se
tige
ra
Selenastrum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
TreuJbaria sp
.
718.
914
1.8
141.
8
140 14 14
17.9 1.8
1.8
284.8
130
16.3
577.3
Table 15. Taxa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
sites
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
oo
ho
CHRYSOPHYTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Mallomonas acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mall
omonas
gl
obos
a Mallomonas sp
. PI
eurosigma de
lica
tulu
m Pl
euro
sigm
a sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYANOPHYTA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
Anaf
caen
a sp.
Aphanoca
psa
delicatissima
Aphanoca
psa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococcu
s dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
limn
etic
us
Chro
ococcu
s sp
. Dactylococcopsis fascicularis
Dactyloc
occopsis sp
. Ly
ngby
a limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Ma
rsso
niel
la el
egan
s Oscillatoria angusta
Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Oscillatoria limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
tenuis
Osci
llat
oria
sp.
Sept
embe
r 16,
1986--Continued
85
10.6
100
12.8
0
0.0
0 0.0
71 14
380
180
8.9
1.8
47.5
22.5
200
25.0
57 43 99 14
7.3
5.5
12.7
1.8
85
10.9
280
31.1
284.8
284.8
280
31.1
Phormidiim sp.
Synechococcus
lineare
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. minor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
42
5.3
130
16.7
0
0.0
0 0.0
Chroomon
as sp.
Cryp
tomo
nas
eros
aCryptomo
nas
marsonii
28
3.5
28
3.6
Cryptomo
nas
ovat
a Cryptomo
nas
rost
rata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rati
form
is
--
--
28
3.6
Cryptomo
nas
sp.
--
14
1.8
Rhodomonas mi
nuta
14
1.8
57
7.3
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
Euglena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
oo
Trachelo
mona
s sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DIN
OFLA
GELL
ATES
) 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 Ce
rati
um hirundinella
Gymnodinium
sp.
Peridiniim b
iceps
Peri
dini
im in
cons
picu
a Peridiniim sp.
Total
cell
s and
percent
composition
Number of sp
ecie
sDiversity
inde
x (D
I) at sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biom
ass
(mg/
L dr
y weight)
Chlorophyll
a (|
Jg/L
)Chlorophyll
b (|
Jg/L
)Chlorophyll
c (|
Jg/L
)
800
99
122.95 0.2
1.4
0.0
0.5
780
100
213.99 __
__
1.1
0.0
0.0
900
100
72.28 2.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
580 7
2.34 3.5
3.5
0.0
1.3
99
__ -- -- --
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers, an
d percent
comp
osit
ion
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter years
1985-87-
-Conti
nued
TJUVTTTM
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)Jr
Hi J-iUM
_ _
_, .
_ _
_ .
_ ,.,
2-ft
Co
mpos
ite
2-ft
Composite
"I
. depth
(0-1
0 ft
) depth
(0-1
0 ft
)nus
sPec
ies
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
Cells
% Comp
June
9,
19
87
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) 44
0 0.6
--
--
280
1.6
CENTRALES
170
0.2
--
--
110
0.6
Cyclotella b
odan
ica
Cyclotella k
utzingiana
Cyclotella m
eneg
hini
ana
Cyclotel
la pse
udos
tell
iger
aCy
clot
ella
stelligera
170
0.2
--
--
110
0.6
Melo
sira
gr
anul
ata
var.
angustissima
Melo
sira
italica
Melo
sira
li
rata
Me
losi
ra sp.
Rhiz
osol
enia
eriensis
Stephanodiscus alpinus
Stephanodiscus astrea
Step
hanodi
scus
ni
agar
ae
Step
hanodi
scus
tenuis
Step
hanodi
scus
sp.
PENNALES
270
0.4
--
--
170
1.0
Achnanth
es af
fini
s Ac
hnan
thes
la
nceo
lata
Achnanth
es minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
veneta
Amph
ora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
fo
nnos
a Cocconeis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
Cymbella affinis
Cymbella mi
nuta
--
--
--
--
57
0.
3Cy
mbel
la m
inuta
f. latens
Cymbella m
inuta
var.
silesica
Cymbella si
nuat
a Diatoma
anceps
Diatoma
hiemale
var.
me
sodo
n Diatoma
tenu
e va
r. el
onga
tum
Diatoma
vulg
are
Diploneis
sp.
57
0.1
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Euno
tia
sp.
Fragilaria capucina
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
s Fragilar
ia pi
nnat
a Fragilar
ia va
uche
riae
Go
mpho
nema
angustatum
Gyro
sigm
a sp
ence
rii
Hannaea
arcus
14
0.0
Hannaea
arcu
s va
r. amphioxys
°°
Hannaea
arcus
var.
arcus
Hantzschia am
phio
xys
Meridion circulare
Navi
cula
arvensis
Navi
cula
capitata
Navi
cula
cryptocephala
Navi
cula
cryptocephala
var.
vene
ta
Navi
cula
ga
stru
m Na
vicu
la h
eufl
eri
Navi
cula
lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
men
iscu
lus
var.
up
sali
ensi
s Na
vicu
la m
inim
a Na
vicu
la m
inus
cula
Na
vicu
la m
utic
a Na
vicu
la no
tha
Navi
cula
pel
lico
sa
57
0.1
Navi
cula
pu
pula
Navicula ra
dios
a Navicula ra
dios
a va
r. te
nell
a
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numb
ers,
an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phytoplankt
on at
sites
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Reservoir, water
years
1985-87--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-
ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
2-ft
de
pth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
PENNALES--
Cont
inue
dNavicula rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navicula sabinians
var.
interm
edia
Navi
cula tantula
Navi
cula tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la vi
ridu
laNavicula vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
meNa
vicu
la viridula va
r. av
enac
eaWavicula sp.
,_,
Nitz
schia
acicularis
°°
Nitz
schi
a communis
Nitz
schia
dissipata
57
0.1
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schia
frustulum
Nitzschia
hantzschiana
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitzschia
ignorata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitzschia
latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
isNitzschia
longissima va
r. re
vers
aNi
tzsc
hia
micr
ocep
hala
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
28
0.0
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNitzschia
pusi
lla
Nitz
schia
romana
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
lis
Nitz
schi
a tryblionella va
r. debilis
Nitz
schi
a sp
. 57
0.1
June
9, 1987--Continued
110
0.6
Pleu
rosi
gma
deli
cat a I t
unRh
oico
sphe
nia
curvata
Rhop
alod
ia m
usculus
Suri
rell
a angustata
Suri
rell
a ov
alis
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
aSn
yedr
a radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rumpens
var.
familiaris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
contracta
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
dani
caSy
nedr
a ulna v
ar.
oxyr
hync
hus
Syne
dra
sp.
ThaJassiosira
fluv
iati
lis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
280
0.4
--
--
57
0.3
Acti
nast
nan ha
ntzs
chii
Ac
tina
stna
n sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Ankistrodesmus convolutus v.
acicularis
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Anki
stro
desm
us fa
lcat
us va
r.acicularis
Ankistrodesmus falcatus va
r. mirabilis
Cart
eria
sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
--
--
--
--
57
0.3
Chlo
rell
a sp.
57
0.1
Chlo
roco
ccum hum
icol
aCh
loro
cocc
um sp.
Chlo
rogo
nium
spi
rale
Chlo
rogo
nium sp.
Chodatella qu
adri
seta
Clos
teri
um sp.
Cocc
omyx
a minor
Cruc
igen
ia quadrata
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Reservoir, water
year
s 1985-87-
-Conti
nued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)2-
ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Comp
0000
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN ALGAE) Continued
Dictyosp
haer
ium
ehrenbergianum
Dictyosp
haer
ium pulchellum
Dict
yosp
haer
ium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nkin
ia ra
diat
a Golenkiniopsis solitaria
Gonium sp.
Kirc
hner
iella
cont
orta
Mesotaenium
sp.
Micratinium pusillum
Micratinium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pand
orin
a morum
Phacotus lenticularis
Phac
otus
sp.
Platymonas
sp
. Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
arma
tus
Scen
edes
mus
biju
ga
Scen
edes
mus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scenedesmu
s sp.
Schroederia
juda
yi
Schroederia
setigera
Sele
nast
rum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treu
Jbar
ia sp.
June
9, 1987--Continued
110
0.2
110
0.2
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGA
E)
0 0.0
--
0 0.0
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
MaJJomon
as acaroides
Mall
omon
as akrokonos
Mallomon
as gl
obos
a Mallomonas sp.
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatulum
Pleu
rosi
gma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYANOPHYTA (B
LUE-
GREE
N AL
GAE)
0
0.0
--
--
0 0.
0 An
afca
ena
sp.
Aphanoca
psa
delicatissima
Aphanoca
psa
sp.
Aphanoth
ece
sp.
Chroococ
cus
dispersus
Chro
ococ
cus
limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyngbya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Marssoniella elegans
Oscillatoria an
gust
a Os
cill
ator
ia an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
tenuis
Osci
llat
oria
sp
. Ph
ormi
dium sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s Ji
near
e Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
Synechococcus
sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
0 0.0
--
0 0.0
Chroomon
as sp.
Cryptomonas
erosa
Cryp
tomo
nas
mars
onii
Cr
ypto
mona
s ov
ata
Tabl
e 15.--raxa, nu
mber
s, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankton at si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney Re
serv
oir/
water
year
s 19
85-8
7--C
onti
nued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-
ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
10 o
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)--
Cont
inue
d Cr
ypto
mona
s rostrata
Cryptomonas
rost
rati
form
is
Cryptomonas
sp.
Rhodomonas minuta
EUGL
ENOP
HYTA
(E
UGLE
NOID
S)
Eugl
ena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
Trac
helomo
nas
sp.
PYRR
HOPH
YTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Cera
tium
hirundinella
Gymnodin
ium
sp.
Peri
dini
um b
iceps
Peridinium in
cons
picu
a Peridinium sp.
Total
cell
s an
d pe
rcen
t composition
Number of species
Diversity
inde
x (D
I) at sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biomass
(mg/
L dr
y we
ight
)
Chlorophyll
a (|
Jg/L
)Chlorophyll
b (|
Jg/L
)Chlorophyll
c (|
Jg/L
)
June
9,
19
87--
Cont
inue
d
14 14
71,0
00
71,0
00
0.0
0.0
98.6
98.6
0 0.
0
17,000
100.
0
17,000
100.
0
72,0
00
100
120.
11276.2
17,000
102
50.
1866
.8
-- _ _
_ _-- ._
June
19
, 19
87
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS)
230
13.5
110
16.4
40
0 76
.9
410
87.2
CENTRALES
200
11.8
71
10.6
10
0 19
.2
100
21.3
Cyclotella bo
dani
caCy
clot
ella k
utzingiana
28
1.6
71
10.6
57
11.0
57
12.1
Cyclotella m
eneg
hini
ana
170
10.0
43
8.3
43
9.1
Cyclotella p
seudostelligera
Cyclotella st
elli
gera
Me
losi
ra gr
anul
ata
var.
angustissima
Melo
sira
it
alic
a Me
losi
ra lirata
Melo
sira
sp.
Rhizosolenia er
iens
is
Stephanodiscus al
pinu
s Stephanodiscus as
trea
Stephanodiscus ni
agar
ae
Stephanodiscus tenuis
Stephanodiscus sp.
PENN
ALES
28
1.6
42
6.3
300
57.7
310
66.0
Achnanthes af
fini
s Ac
hnan
thes lanceolata
Achnanthes minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
vene
ta
Amphora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
fo
rmos
a Cocconeis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
grac
ilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
Cymbella af
fini
s Cymbella m
inuta
Cymbella m
inut
a f. latens
Cymb
ella
min
uta
var. si
lesi
ca
Cymb
ella
si
nuat
a Diatoma
ance
ps
Diatoma
hiemale
var. me
sodo
n
--
--
--
--
14
3.0
Tabl
e 15.--Taxa, numbers, and percent
composition
of p
hyto
plan
fcton
at si
tes
1 and
2 in Ke
nney
Res
ervo
ir,
water
years
1985
-87-
-Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-
ft
Comp
osit
e depth
(0-1
0 ft
)
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
Comp
osit
edepth
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
BACILLARIOPHYT
A (D
IATO
MS)-
-Con
tinu
ed
PENN
ALES
--Co
ntin
ued
Diatoma
tenu
e var. el
onga
tum
Diat
oma
vulgare
Dipl
onei
s sp
.Epithemia
sorex
Eunotia
sp.
Frag
ilar
ia ca
puci
naFr
agil
aria
cr
oton
ensi
sFr
agil
aria
pinnata
Frag
ilaria
va
uche
riae
Gomp
honema
an
gust
atum
Gyro
sigma
spencerii
Hann
aea
arcus
Hann
aea
arcu
s va
r. am
phio
xys
Hann
aea
arcu
s va
r. ar
cus
Hant
zsch
ia amphioxys
Weridion
circulare
Navi
cula arvensis
Navi
cula ca
pita
taNa
vicu
la cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Wavi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
Navi
cula
gastrum
Wavi
cula
heu
fieri
Navi
cula
lanceolata
Navi
cula
lu
zone
nsis
Navi
cula
men
iscu
lus
var.
up
saliensis
Navi
cula
min
ima
Navi
cula
minuscula
Wavicula m
utic
aNa
vicu
la n
otha
June 19,
1987
--Co
ntin
ued
286.0
285.4
286.0
Navi
cula
pe
llic
osa
Navi
cula
pup
ula
Navi
cula
radiosa
Navi
cula
radiosa
var.
te
nell
aNa
vicu
la rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
sabinians
var.
intermedia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
aNa
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la vi
ridu
laNa
vicu
la vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
me
--
--
--
--
57
11.0
11
0 23
.4Na
vicu
la vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avenacea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a ac
icul
aris
--
28
4.2
57
11.0
28
6.
0Ni
tzsc
hia
comm
unis
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
--
--
--
--
14
3.0
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schi
a frustulum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
--
--
--
--
57
11.0
14
3.
0Ni
tzsc
hia
hung
aric
aNi
tzsc
hia
ignorata
--
--
14
2.7
7 1.
5£
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
--
14
2.1
28
5.4
14
3.0
Nitz
schi
a latens
--
--
--
--
28
5.4
Nitz
schi
a linearis
Nitz
schi
a longissima va
r. re
vers
aNi
tzsc
hia
microcephala
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNi
tzsc
hia
pusilla
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
28
1.
6 --
--
14
2.7
14
3.0
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
lis
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la va
r. de
bili
sNi
tzsc
hia
sp.
Pleurosigma
delicatalmn
Rhoicosphenia
curv
ata
Rhop
alod
ia mu
scul
usSu
rire
lla
angustata
Suri
rell
a ov
alis
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
Tabl
e 15.--raxa, nu
mber
s, an
d pe
rcen
t composition
of phytoplankton at
sites
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Rese
rvoi
r, wa
ter years
1985
-87-
-Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
1)Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft
) depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
)--C
onti
nued
PENNALES--Continued
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
a Sn
yedr
a ra
dien
s Sy
nedr
a ru
mpen
sSy
nedr
a ru
mpen
s va
r. fa
mili
ar is
Sy
nedr
a ulna
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. contracta
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
dani
ca
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. ox
yrhy
nchu
s Sy
nedr
a sp
. TT
iala
ssio
sira
fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN AL
GAE)
Actinast
rum hantzschii
Actinast
rum
sp.
Anki
stro
desm
us convolutus
Anki
stro
desm
us convolutus v.
acicularis
Ankistro
desmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus falcatus va
r.acicul
aris
Anki
stro
desm
us fa
lcat
us va
r. mi
rabi
lis
Carteria sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
Chlorella
sp.
Chlo
roco
ccum humicola
Chlo
roco
ccum
sp.
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp
iral
e
June 19,
1987--Contined
142.7
439.
1
310
18.2
320
47.8
110
21.2
143.
0
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chodatella quadriseta
Closterium sp.
Cocc
omyx
a minor
Crucigenia qu
adra
ta
Dict
yosp
haerium
ehrenbergianum
Di
ctyo
sphaerium pulchellum
Dictyosphaerium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Golenkinia ra
diat
a Golenkiniopsis so
lita
ria
Goni
um sp.
Kirchneriella
contorta
Meso
taen
ium
sp.
Micratinium
pusillum
Micr
atin
ium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pand
orin
a morum
Phac
otus
lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Platymon
as sp.
Pteromon
as sp.
Scen
edes
mus
arma
tus
Scen
edes
mus
biju
ga
Scen
edes
mus
dimo
rphu
s Sc
ened
esmu
s quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schroederia
juda
yi
Schroederia
seti
gera
Se
lena
stru
m mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schr
oete
ri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treubaria
sp.
110
21.2
143.
0
281.6
280
16.5
260
38.8
578.5
vo ON
Tabl
e 15.--Taxa, numbers, an
d pe
rcen
t composition
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
I an
d 2
in K
enney
Reservoir, water
year
s 1985-87--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenney Reservoir (site
1)2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Comp
Composite
(0-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Comp
CHRYSOPHYTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGA
E)
Dino
Jbry
on d
ivergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Mall
omonas
acaroides
Mall
omon
as akrokonos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Ma
llom
onas
sp.
PIeurosig
ma de
lica
tulu
m Pl
euro
sigm
a sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYANOPHYTA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
AnaJ
baen
a sp.
Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
disp
ersu
s Ch
rooc
occu
s limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyng
bya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Ma
rsso
niel
la elegans
Osci
llat
oria an
gust
a Os
cill
ator
ia an
gust
issi
ma
Oscillatoria limnetica
Oscillatoria tenuis
Osci
llat
oria
sp.
28 28 140
1.6
1.6
790
46.5 8.2
620
36.5
June 19,
1987--Continued
43
6.4
0 0.
00.
0
436.4
142.
10.
014
3.0
142.
1
143.
0
Phormidi
um sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s 1i
near
e Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mino
rSy
nech
ococ
cus
sp.
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)Chroomonas
sp
.Cr
ypto
mona
s erosa
Cryp
tomo
nas
mars
onii
Cryp
tomo
nas
ovat
aCr
ypto
mona
s ro
stra
ta
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
ra tiformis
Cryp
tomo
nas
sp .
Rhodomonas minuta
EUGLENOPHYTA (E
UGLE
NOID
S)Eu
glen
a acus
Eugr
lena
vi
ridi
sEu
gr2e
na sp.
Trache2omonas
sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Ceratium
hir
undi
nell
aGymnodin
ium
sp.
Peri
dini
um bic
eps
Peridini
um inconspicua
Peridini
um sp.
Total
cell
s and
percent
comp
osit
ion
Number of
sp
ecie
sDi
versity
inde
x (D
I) at species
level
Biomass
(mg/
L dry
weig
ht)
Chlo
roph
yll
a (Mg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
b (Mg/L)
Chlo
roph
yll
c (Mg/L)
28
260 -- 28 -- -- --
230 0 -- -- 110 -- -- 110 -- --
1,70
0 122.
80 3.4 -- -- --
1.6
15.3
0 0.0
__ 1.6
__ __ __ __ 13.5 0.0
0 0.0
__ __ __
__
__
6.5
180
26.9
__ 6.5
180
26.9
__ __
__
__
102
670
100
82.
37 3.9
__ ____
__
-- 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 -- -- 14 -- 14 -- --
520 13
3.40
11.1 -- -- __
__ 0.0
14 __ __ __ __
14
0.0
14__
14
2.7
0__ __ 2.7
__ --
--
101
470 17
3.65
12.7
__ __ --
--
-- 3.0
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.0
3.0
-- 3.0
0.0
-- -- -- -- --
99
_ _ __ -- -- --
co
Table
15.-
-rax
a, numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Rese
rvoi
r, water
year
s 19
85-8
7--Continued
PHYTTTM
jrnx j-i
Uii
nPTOTD
Genu
s species
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
)CENTRALES
Cyclotella b
odanica
Cyclotella kutzingiana
Cyclotella m
eneghiniana
Cyclotel
la p
seud
oste
llig
era
Cyclotella stelligera
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s
170
130 71 -- --
% Co
mp
27.0
20.6 -- 11.3 -- --
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s
71 14 -- 14 -- --
% Co
mp
July 15,
15.8 3.1
-- 3.1
-- --
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Cells
1987 320 70 -- 14 -- 28
% Comp
74.4
16.3 -- -- 3.3
-- 6.5
Comp
osit
e(0
-10
ft)
Cells
870
140 -- -- --
% Comp
30.0 4.8
-- -- --Me
losi
ra gr
anul
ata
var.
Me
losi
ra italica
Melo
sira
li
rata
Me
losi
ra sp.
Rhizosolenia er
iens
is
Step
hano
disc
us al
pinu
s St
epha
nodi
scus
astrea
Step
hano
disc
us ni
agar
ae
Step
hano
disc
us tenuis
Step
hano
disc
us sp.
PENN
ALES
Achn
anth
es af
fini
s Ac
hnan
thes
lanceolata
Achn
anth
es minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
vene
ta
Amph
ora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
formosa
Cocconeis
placentula
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cyli
ndro
thec
a sp.
Cymatopleura solea
angu
stis
sima
579.
0
286.5
426.7
5712
.725
058
.1
140
4.8
730
25.2
Cymbella affinis
Cymb
ella
mi
nuta
Cymbella m
inut
a f. la
tens
Cymbella m
inut
a var. si
lesi
caCymbella si
nuat
aDi
atom
a an
ceps
Diat
oma
hiemale
var.
me
sodo
nDi
atom
a te
nue
var.
elongation
Diat
oma
vulgare
Diploneis
sp.
Epit
hemia
sore
xEu
noti
a sp
.Fragilaria ca
puci
naFr
agil
aria
cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pinnata
Frag
ilar
ia vaucheriae
Gomphone
ma angustatum
Gyrosigma
spencerii
Hann
aea
arcu
sHa
nnae
a ar
cus
var.
amphioxys
Hann
aea
arcu
s va
r. arcus
Hantzsch
ia amphioxys
Meri
dion
ci
rcul
are
Navi
cula
arvensis
Navi
cula capitata
Navi
cula cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
Navi
cula ga
stru
mNavicula he
ufie
riNa
vicu
la la
nceo
late
Navicula luzonensis
Navicula m
enisculus
var.
up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la m
inim
aNavicula mi
nusc
ula
Navi
cula
mutica
Navicula no
tha
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNavicula pupula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNavicula radiosa
var.
tenella
281.
0
142.
2
143.3
110
3.8
ro o
o
Tabl
e 15
.--T
axa,
numbers, and pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phytoplankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Kenney
Rese
rvoi
r, water
years
1985-S7--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenney Reservoir (site
1)2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Comp
Composite
(0-10
ft)
Cell
s % Comp
Kenney Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Comp
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Co
mp
BACILLARIOPHYTA (DIATOMS)--Continued
PENNALES--Continued
Navi
cula
rhyncocephala
Navi
cula sabinians
var.
in
termedia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
aNa
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la viridula
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la va
r. av
eame
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la v
ar.
aven
acea
JVav
icuI
a sp.
Nitz
schia
acic
ular
isN
itzs
chia
co
nanu
nis
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
Nitz
schi
a filiformis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
Nitz
schi
a hantzschiana
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schia
ignorata
Nitz
schi
a in
term
edia
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schia
line
aris
Nitz
schi
a lo
ngis
sima
var
. re
vers
aNi
tzsc
hia
micr
ocep
hala
Nitz
schia
pale
aNi
tzsc
hia
pale
acea
Nitz
schi
a pu
s ill a
Nitz
schi
a ro
mana
Nitz
schi
a thermalis
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la v
ar.
debi
lis
Nitz
schia
sp.
July 15,
1987--Continued
14
143.
1
284.4
439.
6
14 71 71 28 14 28
3.3
3.3
16.5
16.5 6.5
3.3
6.5
28 57 28 140 85 85 28 140
1.0
2.0
1.0
4.8
2.9
2.9
1.0
4.8
fO o
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatalum
Rhoicosphenia
curvata
Rhopalodia mu
scul
usSurirella
angustata
Surirella
oval is
Surirella
ovat
aSy
nedr
a ac
usSy
nedr
a de
lica
tiss
ima
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
aSn
yedr
a radiens
Syne
dra
rumpens
Syne
dra
rumpens
var.
fa
mili
aris
Syne
dra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
contracta
Syne
dra
ulna va
r. da
nica
Syne
dra
ulna v
ar.
oxyr
hync
hus
Syne
dra
sp.
Thal
assios
ira
fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
280
44.4
Actinastrum hantzschii
Acti
nast
rum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
14
2.2
Ankistro
desmus convolutus v.
acicularis
Ankistrodesmus
Ankistrodesmus
acicular
isAnkistro
desmus falcatus va
r. mi
rabi
lis
14
2.2
Carteria sp.
--
Chla
mydomo
nas
sp.
--
Chloralla
sp.
Chlo
rococcum hum
icol
aCh
loro
coccum sp
. 14
2.2
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp
iral
eCh
loro
goni
um sp.
--
Chod
atel
la qu
adri
seta
Closterium sp.
--
Cocc
omyxa minor
Crucigenia qu
adra
ta
5612
.40.
00.
0
falc
atus
fa
lcat
us va
r.
143.1
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numb
ers,
and percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
sites
1 an
d 2
in K
enne
y Reservoir, wa
ter
years
1985-87 Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s species
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
2-ft
depth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN A
LGAE
)--C
onti
nued
Dictyosphaerium
ehrenbergianum
Dict
yosp
haerium pulchellum
Dictyosphaerium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Golenfeinia
radi
ata
Gole
nkinio
psis
solitaria
Gonium sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a contorta
Mesotaenium
sp.
Micratinium pusillum
Micr
atin
ium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pand
orina
morum
Phac
otus
lenticularis
Phacotus sp.
Platymonas sp.
Pteromon
as sp.
Scen
edes
mus
armatus
Scenedes
mus
biju
ga
Scen
edes
mus
dimorphus
Scenedesmu
s quadricauda
Scen
edes
mus
serr
atus
Sc
ened
esmu
s sp.
Schroederia
juda
yi
Schr
oede
ria
setigera
Selenastrum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurast
rum
sp.
TreuJbaria sp.
July
15,
1987--Continued
142.
214
3.1
140
22.2
286.
2
284.4
579.0
O oo
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGAE)
Dino
bryo
n divergens
Keph
yrio
n spirals
Keph
yrio
n sp.
Mall
omon
as acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mallomonas gl
obos
a Mallomonas sp
. PI
eurosigma delicatulum
Pleu
rosi
gma
sp.
Ochromonas sp
.
CYANOPHYTA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGA
E)
Anabaena sp.
Aphanoca
psa
deli
cati
ssim
a Aphanoca
psa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chroococ
cus
dispersus
Chroococ
cus
limn
etic
us
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Dactylococcopsis sp.
Lyng
bya
limn
etic
a Ly
ngby
a na
na
Marssoniella elegans
Osci
llat
oria
angusta
Osci
llat
oria
an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
te
nuis
Os
cill
ator
ia sp.
Phormidi
um sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s li
near
e Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sigm
oide
a Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
f. mino
r Sy
nech
ococ
cus
sp.
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
Chroomon
as sp.
Cryp
tomo
nas
eros
a Cr
ypto
mona
s ma
rson
ii
Cryp
tomo
nas
ovat
a
42 28 14 57
6.7
4.4
2.2
85
13.5
28 14 14
6.2
3.1
3.1
0.0
0.0
57
12.7
85
13.5
57
12.7
57
9.0
240
53.3
9.0
240
53.3
85
19.8
2,000
69.0
28 14 14
6.5
57
13.3
28 230
3.3
3.3
1.0
7.9
1,50
0 51.7
260
9.0
0.0
Tabl
e 15. Ta
xa,
numbers, an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phytoplankton at
sites
1 an
d 2
in K
enney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
1)2-
ft
depth
Comp
osit
e (0
-10
ft)
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
Comp
osit
e de
pth
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
to o
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)--
Cont
inue
d Cryptomonas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rost
rati
form
is
Cryp
tomo
nas
sp.
jR/i
odom
onas
mi
nuta
EUGL
ENOP
HYTA
(E
UGLE
NOID
S)
Eugl
ena
acus
Eugl
ena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
Trac
helo
mona
s sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Cera
tium
hir
undi
nell
a Gymnodinium
sp.
Peridinium bic
eps
Peridinium in
cons
picu
a Peridinium sp.
Total
cell
s and
percent
composition
Number of sp
ecie
sDiversity
inde
x (DI) at
sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biomass
(mg/
L dr
y we
ight
)
July
15,
1987--Continued
0.0
0.0
0.0
14 14
0.0
3.3
3.3
0.0
28 28
0.0
1.0
1.0
630
101
153.48
12.1
450
100
102.36
12.2
430 15
3.62 1.7
101
2,900
100
162.68 2.8
August 13,
1987
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIA
TOMS
) 630
39.4
580
41.4
920
70.8
640
64.0
CENTRALES
420
26.3
420
30.0
20
0 15
.4
110
11.0
Cyclotella bo
dani
ca
Cyclotella ku
tzin
gian
aCy
clot
ella
meneghiniana
14
0.9
~
--
170
13.1
11
0 11
.0
Cyclotella ps
eudo
stel
lige
raCy
clot
ella
stelligera
71
4.4
110
7.9
28
2.2
Melosira granulata
var. an
gustis
sima
330
20.6
310
22.1
Me
losi
ra italica
Melo
sira
lirata
Melo
sira
sp.
&hizoso2enia eriensis
Stephanodiscus al
pinu
s St
epha
nodi
scus
as
trea
St
epha
nodi
scus
ni
agar
ae
Step
hano
disc
us te
nuis
St
epha
nodi
scus
sp.
o
PENNALES
210
13.1
160
11.4
720
55.4
530
53.0
Achnanthes affinis
Achnanth
es lanceolata
Achnanthes minutissima
Amphora
perpusilla
Amphora
veneta
Amphora
sp.
Aste
rion
e22a
formosa
Cocconeis
plac
entu
la
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cymatopleura so
lea
Cymb
ella
affinis
Cymbella minuta
Cymb
ella
minuta
f. 2atens
Cymbella minuta v
ar.
silesica
Cymbella sinuata
Diatoma
anceps
Diat
oma
hiemale
var.
me
sodo
n
Table
15.-
-rax
a, numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in Ken
ney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7--C
ontinu
ed
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
2-ft
Comp
osit
edepth
(0-1
0 ft
) depth
(0-1
0 ft
) *
- -
*
- -
Cell
s % Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cells
% Co
mp
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS)-Continued
Au*USt
13
' 1987-Continued
PENNALES--
Cont
inue
dDiatoma
tenu
e va
r. elongratum
Diat
oma
vulg
are
Dipl
onei
s sp.
Epit
hemi
a so
rex
Eunotia
sp.
Fragilaria capucina
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
s 200
12.5
160
11.4
Fragilaria pi
nnat
a Fragilaria va
uche
riae
o
Gomp
hone
ma angustatum
Gyrosigma
spencerii
Hann
aea
arcus
Hann
aea
arcu
s va
r. amphioxys
Hannaea
arcus
var.
ar
cus
Hantzschia amphioxys
Meridion c
irculare
Navi
cula
ar
vens
is
Navi
cula
capitata
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
ve
neta
Na
vicu
la ga
stru
m Na
vicu
la h
eufl
eri
Navi
cula
lanceolate
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navi
cula
me
nisc
ulus
va
r. up
sali
ensi
s Na
vicu
la m
inim
a Na
vicu
la m
inus
cula
Na
vicu
la mu
tica
Na
vicu
la n
otha
--
--
--
85
6.5
57
5.7
N> O
Navi
cula
pel
lico
saNa
vicu
la p
upula
Navi
cula
ra
dios
aNa
vicu
la radios a
var. te
nell
aNa
vicu
la rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
sa
bini
ans
var.
interm
edia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
aNa
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
aNa
vicu
la viridula
Navi
cula
viridula v
ar.
avea
meNa
vicu
la viridula va
r. avenacea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
Nitz
schi
a communis
Nitz
schi
a di
ssip
ata
Nitz
schi
a fi
lifo
rmis
Nitz
schi
a fr
ustu
lum
Nitz
schia
hant
zsch
iana
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schi
a ignorata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
isNi
tzsc
hia
longissima va
r. reversa
Nitz
schi
a microcephala
Nitz
schi
a palea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNi
tzsc
hia
pusi
lla
Nitz
schi
a romana
Nitz
schi
a thermal is
Nitz
schi
a tr
ybli
onel
la v
ar.
debi
lis
Nitz
schi
a sp.
Pleu
rosigma
delicatalum
Rhoi
cosp
heni
a curvata
Rhopalodia musculus
Surirella
angustata
Surirella
oval
is
Suri
rell
a ov
ata
Syne
dra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
14 851.
1 6.
57
0.7
57
5.7
574.4
282.8
574.4
141.
4
856.
585
8.5
282.2
85 28
8.5
2.8
280
21.5
140
14.0
28
2.2
282.8
Tabl
e 15.--Taxa, nu
mber
s, and pe
rcen
t composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at si
tes
1 and
2 in Kenney Re
serv
oir,
water years 19
85-8
7--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
species
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenn
ey Reservoir (s
ite
2)2-ft
Comp
osit
e 2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft)
depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Comp
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% Comp
Cells
% C
omp
o
oo
BACI
LLAR
IOPHYTA
(DIATOMS)--Continued
PENN
ALES
--Cont
inue
d Sy
nedr
a fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra minuscula
Snye
dra
radi
ens
Syne
dra
rump
ens
Syne
dra
rumpens
var.
fa
mili
aris
Synedra
ulna
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. contracta
Synedra
ulna v
ar.
dani
ca
Syne
dra
ulna
var
. ox
yrhy
nchu
s Sy
nedra
sp.
Thal
assiosir
a fluviatilis
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
Actinastru
m ha
ntzs
chii
Actinast
rum
sp.
Anfc
istr
odesmus
convolutus
Anfc
istr
odesmus
conv
olut
us v.
acicular
isAn
fcis
trodesmus
falcatus
Anfc
istr
odesmus
falcatus va
r.ac
icularis
Anki
strodesm
us falcatus va
r. mi
rabi
lis
Cart
eria
sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
Chlo
rella
sp.
Chlorococcum humicola
Chlorococcum sp.
Chlo
rogonium
spirale
August 13
, 1987--Continued
140.
9
420
26.3
200
14.3
282.
228
2.8
141.0
282.
228
2.8
ro
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp
. Chodatella quadriseta
Closterium sp.
Coccomyxa
mino
r Crucigenia quadrata
Dict
yosp
haerium
ehrenbergianum
Di
ctyo
sphaerium pulchellum
Dict
yosphaerium
sp.
Gloe
ocys
tis
sp.
Gole
nkin
ia ra
diat
a Go
lenk
inio
psis
solitaria
Goni
um sp.
Kirchneriella
cont
orta
Me
sota
eniu
m sp
. Mi
crat
iniu
m pusillum
Micr
atin
ium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp
. Oo
cyti
s sp.
Pandorina
mo rum
Phac
otus
lenticularis
Phac
otus
sp.
Platymonas sp
. Pteromonas
sp.
Scen
edes
mus
armatus
Scen
edes
mus
biju
ga
Scenedes
mus
dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edes
mus
sp.
Schr
oede
ria
juda
yi
Schroederia
setigera
Selenastrum mi
nutu
m Sp
haer
ocys
tis
schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
Treubaria
sp.
573.6
574.
1
141.0
14
0.9
160
10.0
57
4.1
170
10.6
14
1.0
14
0.9
43
3.1
Tabl
e 15. Taxa
t nu
mber
s, and pe
rcen
t composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, water
year
s 19
85-8
7--Continued
PHYL
UM
ORDE
RGenus
spec
ies
Kenney Res
ervo
ir (site
1)Ke
nney
Res
ervo
ir (site
2)2-
ft
dept
hComposite
(0-10
ft)
2-ft
de
pth
Composite
(0-1
0 ft)
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% C
omp
Cells
% C
omp
CHRYSOPHYTA
(GOL
DEN-
BROW
N AL
GAE)
Di
nobr
yon
divergens
Keph
yrio
n sp
iral
e Ke
phyr
ion
sp.
Wallomonas acaroides
Wall
omonas
akrokonos
Wallomonas gl
obos
a Wallomonas sp.
Pleu
rosigm
a delicatulum
Pleurosigma
sp.
Ochr
omon
as sp.
CYAN
OPHY
TA (BLUE-GREEN
ALGAE)
AnaJbaena
sp.
Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanothece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
dispersus
Chroococ
cus
limneticus
Chro
ococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
sp.
Lyngbya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Wa
rsso
niel
la elegans
Osci
llat
oria
an
gust
a Os
cill
ator
ia an
gust
issi
ma
Osci
llat
oria
limnetica
Osci
llat
oria
tenuis
Osci
llat
oria
sp.
240
15.0
240
15.0
120
110
August 13
, 19
87--
Cont
inue
d
170
12.1
0
0.0
0.0
170
12.1
7.5
340
24.3
6.9
340
24.3
370
28.5
34
0 34
.0
282.
257
5.7
340
26.2
28
0 28
.0
Phormidium sp.
Syne
choc
occu
s li
near
eSy
nech
ococ
cus
sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
choc
occu
s sp.
14
0.9
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S)
220
13.8
140
10.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
Chroomon
as sp.
Cryptomo
nas
eros
aCryptomo
nas
mars
onii
28
1.8
43
3.1
Cryptomo
nas
ovat
a Cryptomo
nas
rost
rata
Cryptomo
nas
rost
rati
form
is
Cryptomo
nas
sp.
Rhodomon
as mi
nuta
EUGL
ENOP
HYTA
(EUGLENOIDS)
Euglena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
Trac
he 1 omonas sp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DIN
OFLA
GELL
ATES
)Ce
rati
um hir
undi
nell
aGymnodinium
sp.
Peridinium bic
eps
Peri
dini
um in
cons
picu
aPeridinium sp.
Total
cell
s and
percent
composition
Number of
sp
ecie
sDiversity
inde
x (DI) at
sp
ecie
s le
vel
Biomass
(mg/
L dr
y we
ight
)
Chlo
roph
yll
a (pg/L)
Chlorophyll
b (pg/L)
Chlorophyll
c (|
Jg/L
)
190 0 -- -- -- 0 -- -- -- --
1,600 15
3.31 4.8 -- -- --
11.9
99
7.1
0.0
0 0.0
-- __
__
__
0.0
0 0.0
--
--
--
102
1,400
102
133.11 6.0
__ __
__
__
--
--
--
--
0 0.
0 0
0.0
__
__
__
__
0 0.
0 0
0.0
-- -- __
__
__
__
1,30
0 10
1 1,
000
101
14
143.18
3.27
81.0
76.2
__ __ --
--
--
--
ho h-«
ho
Table
15.--raxa/ nu
mber
s, and percent
composition
of phytoplankt
on at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Ken
ney
Reservoir, wa
ter
years
1985-87--Continued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genu
s sp
ecie
s
BACI
LLAR
IOPH
YTA
(DIATOMS)
CENTRALES
Cyclotella bo
dani
caCyclotella kutzingiana
Cycl
otel
la m
eneghiniana
Cycl
otel
la p
seudostelligera
Cyclotella st
elli
gera
Melo
sira
gr
anul
ata
var.
an
gust
issi
maMe
losi
ra italica
Melo
sira
li
rata
Melo
sira
sp
.Rhizosolenia eriensis
Step
hano
disc
us al
pinu
sSt
epha
nodi
scus
as
trea
Stephanodiscus n
iaga
rae
Stephanodiscus tenuis
Step
hano
disc
us sp
.
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
2-ft
depth
Cell
s % Co
mp
2,000
34.5
200
3.4
-- 28
0.5
-- 85
1.5
57
1.0
__ __ __ >_ -- -- -- 28
0.5
Composite
(0-1
0 ft
)Cells
% Co
mp
September
1,70
0 18
.9200
2.2
-- -- 57
0.6
-- 140
1.6
-- __ __ __ -_ -- -- -- --
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft
)Ce
lls
% Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
3, 19
87 84
49.4
120
63.2
0 0.
0 28
14.7
--28
14.7
-- __ -- __ __ -- --
PENNALES
Achnanth
es af
fini
s Ac
hnan
thes
lanceolata
Achnanthes minutissima
Amph
ora
perpusilla
Amphora
vene
ta
Amphora
sp.
Aste
rion
ella
formosa
Cocconeis
plac
entu
la
Cylindrotheca
gracilis
Cylindrotheca
sp.
Cyma
topl
eura
solea
1,80
031.0
1,50
0 16.7
8449.4
91
47.9
NS
Cymb
ella affinis
Cymb
ella m
inut
aCy
mbel
la m
inut
a f. latens
Cymbella minuta va
r. silesica
Cymbella sinuata
Diat
oma
anceps
Diatoma
hiem
ale
var.
mesodon
Diatoma
tenu
e var. elongation
Diatoma
vulgare
Dipl
onei
s sp
.Ep
ithe
mia
sore
xEunotia
sp.
Fragilaria capucina
Fragilaria cr
oton
ensi
sFragilaria pi
nnat
aFragilaria va
uche
riae
Gomphonema angustatum
Gyro
sigma
spen
ceri
iHannaea
arcus
Hann
aea
arcus
var.
amphioxys
Hannaea
arcus
var.
ar
cus
Hant
zsch
ia amphioxys
Meridion c
irculare
Navicula arvensis
Navi
cula
ca
pita
taNa
vicu
la cr
ypto
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
cr
ypto
ceph
ala
var.
veneta
Navi
cula
ga
stru
mNa
vicu
la h
eufieri
Navicula lanceolata
Navi
cula
luzonensis
Navicula m
enis
culu
s var. up
sali
ensi
sNa
vicu
la m
inim
aNa
vicu
la m
inus
cula
Navi
cula
mut
ica
Navi
cula
not
haNa
vicu
la p
elli
cosa
Navicula p
upul
aNa
vicu
la radiosa
Navi
cula
radiosa
var.
tenella
147.
4
2816.5
147.4
170
1,60
0
14
2.9
27.6 2.2
1,40
015
.6
2816
.528
14.7
Table
15. Tax
a, numbers, an
d percent
composition
of phy
topl
ankt
on at
si
tes
1 an
d 2
in K
enney Re
serv
oir
, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7 Continued
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Kenney Reservoir
(sit
e 2)
2- ft
Composite
2-ft
Composite
r .
depth
(0-1
0 ft
) depth
(0-1
0 ft
) us sP
ecie
s Cells
% Comp
Cells
% Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
Cell
s % Co
mp
BACILLARIOPHYTA
(DIA
TOMS
) -Continued
September
3, 1987-Continued
PENN
ALES
--Co
ntin
ued
Navi
cula
rh
ynco
ceph
ala
Navi
cula
sa
bini
ans
var.
intermedia
Navi
cula
ta
ntul
a Na
vicu
la tr
ipun
ctat
a Na
vicu
la vi
ridu
la
Navi
cula
vi
ridu
la v
ar.
avea
me
Navi
cula
viridula v
ar.
avenacea
Navi
cula
sp.
Nitz
schi
a acicularis
i-*
Nitz
schi
a communis
--
--
28
0.3
.pxNi
tzsc
hia
diss
ipat
aNi
tzsc
hia
fili
form
isNi
tzsc
hia
frustulum
Nitz
schi
a ha
ntzs
chia
na
28
0.5
28
0.3
28
16.5
28
14.7
Nitz
schi
a hu
ngar
ica
Nitz
schia
ignorata
Nitz
schi
a intermedia
--
--
--
--
--
--
7 3.7
Nitz
schi
a latens
Nitz
schi
a li
near
isNi
tzsc
hia
longissima va
r. re
vers
aNi
tzsc
hia
microcephala
Nitz
schi
a pa
lea
Nitz
schi
a pa
leac
eaNi
tzsc
hia
pusi
lla
Nitz
schi
a romana
Nitz
schi
a th
erma
lis
Nitz
schi
a tryblionella v
ar.
debilis
Nitz
schi
a sp
.
Pleu
rosi
gma
delicatalum
Rhoi
cosp
heni
a cu
rvat
aRhopalod
ia musculus
Surirella
angustata
Surirella
ovalis
Surirella
ovat
aSynedra
acus
Syne
dra
delicatissima
Syne
dra
fasc
icul
ate
Syne
dra
minu
scul
aSn
yedr
a ra
dien
sSynedra
rumpens
Synedra
rumpens
var. fa
mili
aris
Syne
dra
ulna
Synedra
ulna va
r. contracta
Synedra
ulna va
r. danica
Syne
dra
ulna var. ox
yrhy
nchu
sSy
nedr
a sp.
Thal
assi
osir
a fluviatilis
CHLOROPHYTA
(GREEN A
LGAE)
Actinastrum
hantzschii
Actinastrum
sp.
Ankistrodesmus convolutus
Ankistrodesmus co
nvol
utus
v.
acicul
aris
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus falcatus va
r.acicuJ
aris
Ankistrodesmus fa
lcat
us va
r. mirabilis
Carteria sp.
Chla
mydo
mona
s sp.
Chlorella
sp.
Chlo
roco
ccum
humicola
Chlo
roco
ccum
sp.
Chlo
rogo
nium
spirale
Chlo
rogo
nium
sp.
Chod
atel
la qu
adri
seta
Closterium sp.
Coccomyxa
minor
Crucigenia quadrata
851.
5330
3.7
2816.5
2814.7
280.5
280.3
2816
.5
Tabl
e 15. Taxa,
numbers, an
d pe
rcen
t co
mpos
itio
n of phytoplankt
on at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
years
1985-87-
-Con
tinued
PHYLUM
ORDER
Genus
spec
ies
Kenn
ey Reservoir
(sit
e 1)
Composite
Cells
2-ft
depth% Comp
(0-1
0 ft
) Ce
lls
% Comp
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
____depth
Cell
s % Comp
(0-1
0 ft
) Ce
lls
% Comp
ON
CHLO
ROPH
YTA
(GREEN ALGAE)--Continued
Dictyosphaerium
ehrenbergianum
Dictyosphaerium pulchellum
Dict
yosphaerium
sp.
Gloeocysti
s sp.
Gole
nkin
ia ra
diat
a Go
lenk
inio
psis
solitaria
Gonium sp.
Kirc
hner
iell
a co
ntor
ta
Meso
taen
ium
sp.
Micr
atin
ium pusillum
Micratinium
sp.
Moug
eoti
a sp.
Oocy
tis
sp.
Pandorina
morum
Phacotus lenticularis
Phacotus sp
. Pl
atym
onas
sp.
Pteromonas sp.
Scen
edes
mus
armatus
Scen
edesmu
s bi
juga
Sc
ened
esmu
s dimorphus
Scen
edes
mus
quad
rica
uda
Scen
edes
mus
serratus
Scen
edesmu
s sp.
Schroede
ria
juda
yi
Schroederia
setigera
Selenastrum minutum
Spha
eroc
ysti
s schroeteri
Staurastrum
sp.
TreuJbaria sp.
Sept
embe
r 3,
1987--Continued
571.0
140
1.6
28
14.7
110 28 28
1.2
0.3
0.3
CHRY
SOPH
YTA
(GOLDEN-BROWN
ALGAE)
Dinobryon
divergens
Keph
yrio
n spirale
Kephyrion
sp.
Mall
omonas
acaroides
Mallomonas akrokonos
Mall
omonas
gl
obos
a Ma
llom
onas
sp
. Pl
euro
sigm
a delicatulum
Pleu
rosi
gma
sp.
Ochromonas sp.
CYAN
OPHY
TA (B
LUE-
GREE
N AL
GAE)
AnaJbaena
sp.
Aphanocapsa
delicatissima
Aphanocapsa
sp.
Aphanoth
ece
sp.
Chro
ococ
cus
disp
ersu
s Ch
rooc
occu
s limneticus
Chroococ
cus
sp.
Dact
yloc
occo
psis
fascicularis
Dactylococcopsis sp.
Lyng
bya
limnetica
Lyngbya
nana
Marssoniella elegans
Oscillatoria angusta
Oscillatoria an
gust
issi
ma
Oscillatoria limnetica
Oscillatoria tenuis
Oscillatoria sp.
Phormidium sp.
Synechococcus
lineare
Syne
chococ
cus
sigmoidea
Syne
choc
occu
s sigmoidea
f. mi
nor
Syne
chococ
cus
sp.
CRYP
TOPH
YTA
(CRYPTOMONADS)
Chroomonas sp
. Cryptomonas
erosa
Cryp
tomo
nas
mars
onii
Cryptomo
nas
ovata
170
2.9
280.
30
0.0
0 0.0
85 85
3,400
680 28 56
1.5
0.5
1.0
28 910
140
460
0.3
1.5
58.6
11.7
--
6,5
00
850
-- 72.2
9.4
10.1
1.6
2,70
0 46
.6
4,60
0 51
.1 5.1
0 0.0
0 0.0
57
33.5
14
7.4
Tabl
e 15.--raxa, nu
mber
s, an
d percent
comp
osit
ion
of phytoplankton at
si
tes
1 and
2 in
Kenney
Reservoir, wa
ter
year
s 19
85-8
7--C
onti
nued
S3
h-»
00
PHYLUM
fTPTYITP
UK-UHiK
Genu
s spec
ies
CRYPTOPHYTA
(CRY
PTOM
ONAD
S) --Continued
Cryp
tomo
nas
rostrata
Cryp
tomo
nas
rostratiformis
Cryptomonas
sp.
Rhodomonas
minuta
EUGLENOPHYTA
(E
UGLE
NOID
S)Euglena
acus
Euglena
viri
dis
Euglena
sp.
Trachelo
mona
s sp
.
PYRRHOPHYTA
(DINOFLAGELLATES)
Cera
tium
hir
undi
nell
aGymnodinium
sp.
Peridinium b
icep
sPeridinium in
cons
picu
aPeridini
um sp
.
Total
cell
s and
percent
comp
osit
ion
Number of species
Diversity
inde
x (D
I) at sp
ecie
s level
Biomass
(mg/
L dr
y we
ight
)
Chlo
roph
yll
a (M
g/L)
Chlorophyll
b (jJg/L)
Chlorophyll
c (jJg/L)
Kenn
ey Res
ervo
ir (s
ite
1)2-
ftdepth
Cells
% Comp
__ __ 28
0.5
28
0.5
85
1.5
__ __ 85
1.5
0 0.
0-- -- __ __ --
--
5,80
0 10
0
172.
28 7.4
__ __
Comp
osit
e(0
-10
ft)
Cell
s % Co
mp
Sept
embe
r 3,
__ __ 28
0.3
430
4.8
28
0.3
__ __ 28
0.3
0 0.0
__ __
9,000
101
182.
3913.4 __ __
Kenney Re
serv
oir
(sit
e 2)
2-ft
Composite
depth
(0-1
0 ft)
Cell
s % Comp
Cell
s % Co
mp
1987
--Co
ntin
ued
__ -- -- 57
33.5
14
7.4
0 0.
0 28
14.7
__ __28
14.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
__ __ -
170
99
190
100
5
9 --
2.25
--
3.
0527.1
--
26.5
__ --