Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WARZYN
Report Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study13452 Hagen Farm Site
Technical Memorandum - Number 2
Prepared for:Waste Management of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Prepared by:Warzyn Engineering Inc.
Madison, Wisconsin
February 1990
WARZYN
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility StudyHagen Farm Site
Technical Memorandum - Number 2
February 1990
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1-1
General ..................................................... 1-1Objectives .................................................. 1-1Approach .................................................... 1-2
2. SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED .................................... 2-1
Subtask 3.1 - Source Characterization ....................... 2-1Subtask 3.2 - Migration Pathway Assessment .................. 2-1
Activity 3.2.1 - Meteorological Investigation ........... 2-1Activity 3.2.3 - Hydrogeologlc Investigation ............ 2-1
Survey. ............................................. 2-2Water Level Measurements. ........................... 2-2In-S1tu Hydraulic Conductivity Testing. ............. 2-2
Subtask 3.3 Contaminant Characterization ................... 2-3Activity 3.3.1 - A1r Quality Evaluation ................. 2-3Activity 3.3.3 - Groundwater and Surface Water Quality
Assessment ............................. 2-3Soil Characterization. .............................. 2-4Groundwater Sampling While Drilling. ................ 2-5Monitoring Well Installation. ....................... 2-6
• Round 2 Sampling. ................................... 2-7Private Well Sampling. .............................. 2-7
3. RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION ..................................... 3-1
Site-Specific Geology ....................................... 3-1Fine-Grained Soils ...................................... 3-1
Hydrogeology ................................................ 3-2Water Levels ............................................ 3-2Horizontal Flow ......................................... 3-3Vertical Flow ........................................... 3-4In-SItu Hydraulic Conductivities ........................ 3-5Sundby Production Wells ................................. 3-5Historic Site Operations................................. 3-6
Groundwater/Leachate Sampling Results ....................... 3-7Data Quality ............................................ 3-7Volatile Organic Compounds .............................. 3-8Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds ......................... 3-8Selected Metals ......................................... 3-9Indicator Parameters .................................... 3-9Private Well Sampling Results ........................... 3-10Comparison of Round 1 and Round 2 Data .................. 3-10Comparison of Groundwater Screening and Round 2 SamplingResults ................................................. 3-11
4. EXTENT AND MAGNITUDE OF CONTAMINATION ........................ 4-1
Groundwater Flow ............................................ 4-1Groundwater Quality ......................................... 4-1
Attenuation ............................................. 4-2
WARZYN
5. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 5-1
6. RECOMMENDATION FOR ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
Additional Data Requirements ..............Proposed Additional Investigation ..........Well Installation ..........................Quick Turnaround Time Sampling of New Wells,Additional Piezometer Installation ........Round 3 Sampling ..........................
7. REFERENCES.
TABLES
6-1
6-16-26-36-46-56-5
7-1
Table 1 - Round 2 Sampling-Field MeasurementsTable 2 - Summary of In-S1tu Hydraulic Conductivity TestTable 3 - Summary of Laboratory Soil Testing ResultsTable 4 - Groundwater Sampling While Drilling Field MeasurementsTable 5 - Summary of VOC Screening Results for Groundwater Sampling While
DrillingTable 6 - Phase II SamplingTable 7 - Summary of Vertical Hydraulic GradientsTable 8 - Summary of Computer Simulations - Effect of Sundby Production Wells
FIGURE
Figure 1 - WMI's Proposed Remedial Selection Process 1n Accordance with SARA
DRAWINGS
Drawing 13452-1 - Sampling Location MapDrawing 13452-B1 - Surftclal Soils MapDrawing 13452-F11 - Geologic Cross Section Location MapDrawing 13452-F12 - Geologic Cross Sections A-A1 and B-B1Drawing 13452-F13 - Water Table Map (9-15-89)Drawing 13452-F14 - Round 2 Groundwater Sampling Results
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Analytical ResultsAl - Monitoring Well Sampling ResultsA2 - Private Well Sampling ResultsA3 - Surface Water Sampling ResultsA4 - Leachate Sampling Results
Appendix B - Meteorological DataAppendix C - Water LevelsAppendix D - Hydraulic Conductivity TestsAppendix E - Ambient Air Sampling ResultsAppendix F - Soil Testing ResultsAppendix G - Boring LogsAppendix H - Well DetailsAppendix I - Sundby Production Well Information and Computer Simulations
[skb-600-02x] WARZYN
SECTION 1INTRODUCTION ~
GeneralThis Technical Memorandum (Tech Memo 2) has been prepared to address concernsregarding the potential for environmental contamination resulting from pastdisposal of hazardous waste materials at the Hagen Farm Site (Site)(Drawing13452-F11). Historical sampling by Warzyn (1982) for Unlroyal and by theUnited States Geological Survey (USGS) (Patterson, 1985) Indicated thepresence of certain organic compounds at the Site (e.g., benzene,ethylbenzene, tetrahydrofuran, xylenes and toluene).
The Site was proposed for Inclusion on the National Priorities List (NPL) onSeptember 18, 1985. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. (WMWI) and Unlroyalentered Into an Administrative Consent Agreement (U.S. EPA Docket No. VW 87-C-016, dated September 14, 1987) with the U.S. EPA to conduct a RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS). The first phase of the RI was aimedat describing the nature of the source of contamination and the possiblepathways of migration and exposure to the contamination. The results of PhaseI are detailed 1n Technical Memorandum Number 1 (Tech Memo 1) (Warzyn, 1989).
Ob.lectlvesTech Memo 2 has been prepared to meet the requirements of the approved RI/FSWork Plan. This Work Plan specifies a phased, Iterative approach to theinvestigation. Figure 1 presents the sequence of activities for the HagenFarm RI/FS.
The primary objective of this phase of the Investigation 1s to de terjnlne_tbe..extent and magnitude of contamination from the source along the migrationpathways of concern. The scope of work for this phase of the Investigationwas originally proposed 1n Tech Memo 1 and subsequently modified 1n the WorkPlan Addendum dated July 12, 1989. Results from this phase will be used toevaluate the need for possible additional Investigative studies and toIdentify and screen applicable remedial action technologies.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 1-2 13452.60
ApproachThe Investigation focused on the major potential migration pathways Identified1n Tech Memo 1. Emphasis was placed on Investigating the groundwater andsurface water quality and the hydrogeologlcal characteristics of the site.
In order to Incorporate Tech Memo 2 and Tech Memo 1 Into the RI report, anattempt was made to present each Tech Memo 1n modular format. In some cases,Phase II results have appended or modified results and conclusions presented1n Tech Memo 1. Therefore, some of the material presented 1n Tech Memo 2 willreplace previously Issued material 1n Tech Memo 1 when Incorporated Into theRI report.
[skb-600-02]
WARZYN
SECTION 2SUHHARY OF WORK PERFORMED
Subtask 3.1 - Source CharacterizationA second round of sampling was obtained at leachate headwell LH1 and at thefive source characterization wells (SCW1 to SCW5) on September 8, 1989 1nconjunction with the Groundwater Quality Assessment sampling (see Activity3.3.3). The leachate sample was obtained with the dedicated PVC bailerInstalled prior to Round 1 sampling. No liquid was purged from the well priorto sampling due to the small volume 1n the well. The five water table wellswere sampled after 3 casing volumes had been removed using previouslyInstalled dedicated stainless steel bailers. Specific conductance,temperature, pH and field observations of each sample were recorded 1n thefield (Table 1).
The samples were analyzed by Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory(ENSECO/RMAL) for a reduced 11st of parameters based on the results of Round 1analyses presented 1n Tech Memo 1, and approved 1n the Work Plan Modification.Each sample was analyzed for U.S. EPA Target Compound List (TCL) VOCs andtetrahydrofuran, barium, lead, mercury, alkalinity, chloride and sulfate.Samples for EPA TCL sem1-volat1les were also obtained from wells LH1, SCW2 andSCW4. Results are presented In Appendix A. The sampling and analyticalmethodologies used 1n this activity are described 1n detail 1n the QualityAssurance Project Plan (QAPP) and the Sampling Plan (Appendix A of the QAPP).
Subtask 3.2 - Migration Pathway AssessmentActivity 3.2.1 - Meteorological InvestigationCollection of meteorological data since September 9, 1988 as described 1n TechMemo 1 continued at the Site during the Phase II Investigation. Datacollection was discontinued on July 31, 1989. Results are summarized 1nAppendix B.
Activity 3.2.3 - Hvdroqeologlc InvestigationInstallation of additional groundwater monitoring wells as part of theContaminant Characterization subtask provided supplemental Information ongroundwater elevations and geologic strata.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 2-2 13452.60
Survey. Newly Installed monitoring wells and selected previously Installedwells (old wells) were surveyed for location and elevation on September 6 and7 1989 by Warzyn. Reference elevations were based on a best fit of resultsfrom seven old wells (MW12, MW14, P14B, MW15, MW17, MW22 and MW24). The newand previously recorded elevations of these wells were within 0.03 ft. Basedon this reference, the elevations of wells P7B, P12B, P17Br MW18 and MW19 weremodified; the new elevations are presented along with the Phase II wells 1nAppendix C. Wells P7B, P12B and P17B were modified by cutting off part of thePVC casing to accommodate bladder pumps. Well MW19 appeared to have beenraised due to frost heave. Well MW18 was observed to be lower by 0.10 ftbased on resurveylng.
Water Level Measurements. Monthly water level measurements were obtained fromFebruary through October 1989, with measurements at the new Phase II wellsIncluded during August through October. Water elevations are presented 1nAppendix C. Measurements were obtained using an electronic water levelIndicator which was rinsed with delonlzed water and wiped clean with papertowels between wells. Measurements were performed sequentially from lesscontaminated wells to more contaminated wells, as determined by availableInformation. Surface water measurements were also obtained at the three staffgauge locations.
In-S1tu Hydraulic Conductivity Testing. Single well In situ hydraulicconductivity tests (balldowns) were performed on October 24r 1989 at the sevennewly Installed water table wells. Tests were not performed at the eightnewly Installed piezometers due to the presence of dedicated sampling pumpswhich prohibit the 1n-s1tu tests. Removal of the pumps to perform the testswould negate the advantages of having, dedicated equipment. The objectives ofthe tests were to determine hydraulic conductivities and assess groundwaterflow rates for the water bearing strata, supplementing the existing dataacquired during Phase I.
The tests were performed by decreasing the water level of a well using a PVCbailer attached to a stainless steel cable or nylon rope. Test equipment wasdecontaminated between uses with a trl-sodlum phosphate (TSP) solution andrinsed with delonlzed water. The rope was discarded after use. Water level
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 2-3 13452.60
recovery was monitored using a data logger and pressure transducer. Acomputer program was used to calculate the hydraulic conductivity based on theBouwer and R1ce (1976) method. A summary of the method, along with the testdata and results 1s presented 1n Appendix D. Results are summarized InTable 2.
Subtask 3.3 Contaminant CharacterizationData generated from the Source Characterization and Migration PathwayAssessment during Phase I was used to design an environmental sampling andanalysis program, the scope of which 1s outlined 1n Tech Memo 1. Theobjective of the program 1s to evaluate the extent and magnitude ofcontaminant migration along the pathways of concern.
Activity 3.3.1 - A1r Quality EvaluationThe ambient air sampling performed under this activity was discussed 1n TechMemo 1, but the results were not available at the time of submlttal. Resultsfrom the ambient air sampling are presented 1n Appendix E. As discussed 1nthe Work Plan modification, further baseline air quality evaluations are notanticipated at this time. This 1s based on the condition the No Actionalternative will not be selected for the Site. However, air quality Issueswill be addressed 1n the Implementation analysis for action-orientedalternatives.
Activity 3.3.3 Groundwater and Surface Water Quality AssessmentThis activity Included the completion of fifteen soil borings, Instrumentedwith seven water table wells and eight piezometers, and the sampling ofselected wells and surface water locations for selected analytical parameters.Well locations and parameter selection were based on the results of the SourceCharacterization and Migration Pathway Assessment presented In Tech Memo 1 andsubsequently modified to Incorporate U.S. EPA comments. Surface watersampling at the nearby drainage ditch and at Sundby's pond was also performed.
The following designations have been used for borings and groundwaterobservation wells at the site, based on the first letter of the boring/wellname:
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 2-4 13452.60
• B - soil borings• MW - water table well (monitoring well)• P - piezometer
The subsequent numbers (and letters) 1n the boring/well names Indicate theboring/well number. Borings (e.g., B25B) and corresponding observation wells(e.g., P25B) which were Instrumented 1n the borings can be correlated by theboring/well numbers. The following discussion makes use of both boring andwell names, depending on whether the discussion refers to the boring or thewell.
Soil Characterization. Fifteen soil borings were drilled at nine locationsbetween July 5 and August 18, 1989. Objectives were to characterize soils,Identify soil properties potentially controlling contaminant migration, and toInstall groundwater monitoring wells. One additional boring (B17C) wasdrilled but had to be abandoned and replaced (Boring B17CR) due to loss of thedrive shoe-downhole during drilling. Boring locations were selected primarilyto provide additional Information on the horizontal and vertical extent ofcontamination, and on surface water-groundwater Interactions. Boringlocations are shown as monitoring wells P17C, P22B, MW25, P25B, MW26, P26B,MW27, P27Bf MW28, P28B, HW29, P29B, MW30, P30B and MW31 on Drawing 13452-F11.
Borings were completed using either 4 l/4-1n. I.D. x 8 l/2-1n. O.D. hollowstem augers or rotary boring with 4-1n. I.D. temporary steel casing, a 3 7/8-1n. trlcone bit, and clear water.
Soil samples were obtained from the deepest boring at each location. BoringB17C (and B17CR) was not sampled during drilling because this location hadbeen previously sampled during the Installation of piezometer P17B.
Soil samples were collected with a split spoon sampler using ASTM MethodD1586. Samples were collected at 2.5-ft Intervals from ground surface todepth of 10 ft, and at 5-ft Intervals between 10 ft depth and the bottom ofthe boring. Samples were visually classified 1n the field by a geologist orgeotechnical engineer.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 2-5 13452.60
Fifteen soil samples were analyzed for grain size distribution and percentvolatile residue. Atterberg limits (liquid limit and plasticity Index) weredetermined for two of the samples. Test results are presented In Appendix Fand summarized 1n Table 3. Final torlng logs (Appendix G) were prepared basedon both field observations and laboratory soil testing results.
Split spoons were cleaned between each use with a TSP and water wash, followedby a tap water rinse. Drilling rods, augers, casing and tools were cleanedbetween borings with a high pressure washer. Drill Hgs were cleaned 1n thesame manner between locations. Drill cuttings were screened with aphoto1on1zat1on meter. Cuttings that exhibited above-background readings werecollected and drummed or placed 1n the lugger box located at thedecontamination area. Other drill cuttings were left at each well site.
Groundwater Sampling While Drill 1 no. Groundwater was collected at 10 ftIntervals during drilling from borings 1n which piezometers were to beInstalled (except boring B17CR). Samples were analyzed for pH, specificconductance and temperature 1n the field and for the target volatile organiccompounds (VOCs) listed 1n Appendix A. VOC analyses were performed at theWarzyn Analytical Laboratory using gas chromotography. Results were used toaid 1n determining screen depths for the piezometers. The depth of piezometerP17C was determined based on stratlgraphlc data; the boring was not sampled.
The approach for determining piezometer screen depths generally Involvedsampling groundwater to a depth of 30 ft below the water table. If VOCs werenot detected 1n any of the samples, the piezometer depths were selected tomaintain approximately 25 ft of separation between the bottom of theassociated water table well and the bottom of the piezometer screen. If VOCswere detected, sampling was discontinued when VOC concentrations 1n thedeepest sample were less than concentrations observed above, and thepiezometer screen was placed to Intercept the maximum observed contaminantconcentrations.
Water samples were obtained using a HydroPunch sampling tool, stainless steelbailer, or Bralnard-Kllman (B-K) piston pump. Generally, the HydroPunch was
WARZYN
February 16. 1990 2-6 13452.60
driven 5 ft ahead of the base of the borehole and then retracted 1.5 ft,allowing groundwater to flow Into the tool. After 20 to 30 minutes, the toolwas withdrawn and approximately 500 ml of sample was obtained from thesampling chamber. If soils were deemed too dense to attempt sampling Q 30blows per foot), or 1f the tool was damaged or failed to open because thefine-grained sediments Inhibited proper retraction, a sample was not obtained,or a bailer or B-K pump was used. Observations, pH, specific conductance andtemperature were recorded 1n the field. Samples were delivered to Warzyn'sAnalytical Laboratory on 1ce and analyzed by gas chromotography. Results aresummarized 1n Tables 4 and 5. Sampling methods are Identified In Table 5.
Monitoring Well Installation. Groundwater observation wells were constructedof 2 1n. I.D. threaded flush joint Schedule 40 or Schedule 80 PVC rated NSF-NCby the National Sanitation Foundation; joints were teflon taped. Wellconstruction followed procedures outlined In the Work Plan and Work PlanModification. In general, a No. 30 flint sand filter pack was placed 1n theannular space to approximately 5 ft above the screen, followed by 2 ft of finesilica sand, 3 ft of bentonlte pellets, 6 In. of fine silica sand, bentonlteslurry (deep wells) or granular bentonlte (shallow wells), and a concretesurface seal. An 8 ft long x 4 1n. diameter anodlzed aluminum protector andlocking cap was Installed to a depth of approximately 5 ft. Minor deviations1n well design for some wells Included:
• Less than 5 ft of filter pack sand above the screen.
• No fine silica sand above the bentonlte pellets.• No bentonlte pellet seal due to formation collapse prohibiting
placement of pellets.
For specific Information a well design, refer to the Individual monitor wellconstruction summaries (Appendix H).
The wells were developed by alternately surging and purging with a bailer orby alternately drawing down the water level with a Keck pump and allowing the$using a PVC bailer, B-K pump, or Keck pump until a minimum of 10 casing 'volumes had been removed and the pH, conductivity and temperature had
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 2-7 13452.60
stabilized. Well development Information 1s provided on the Monitor WellConstruction Summaries 1n Appendix H.
Round 2 Sampling. Round 2 sampling was performed on September 6, 7, 8 and 11,1989. Locations Included Round 1 sampling points plus 27 monitoring wells andtwo surface water sampling points (refer to Drawing 13452-F14). Sunday'sprivate well was also sampled (refer to section on private well sampling). Asummary of Phase II sampling parameters and locations 1s presented In Table 6.
Sampling was performed using dedicated stainless steel bailers for the watertable wells and dedicated bladder pumps (Well Wizards) for the piezometers.Three casing volumes were purged from the wells prior to sampling, unless thewell could be purged dry, 1n which case the well was sampled after recovery.Wells MW7 and HW9 were redeveloped and supplied with Inner caps prior tosampling. Well development followed procedures outlined previously for newwells and was performed with dedicated stainless steel bailers. Redevelopmentof well MW12 was discontinued after discovery of the remains of a bird 1n thewell, which prompted the decision not to sample the well. Surface watersamples were obtained near respective staff gauge locations. Groundwatersamples obtained for metals analysis were filtered through 0.45 micron filtersusing a pressure filtration system Immediately after collections. Othersamples were not filtered. Specific conductance, temperature, color, odor andturbidity were recorded 1n the field.
Samples were maintained on 1ce and sent via express mall to ENSECO/RMAL underChain of Custody, and analyzed 1n accordance with the methods described 1nAppendix D of the QAPP. Results are presented 1n Appendix A.
Private Well Sampling. Selected private water supply wells In the vicinity ofthe Site were sampled for EPA TCL VOCs as recommended by the Agency for ToxicSubstances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Private wells at the Lee, Fosdahl,Van Deusen and Gulllckson residences were sampled on February 23, 1989. TheK-Way well was sampled on March 2, 1989. The Sundby Batch Plant well and theSundby residence well were sampled on September 11, 1989. Locations are shownon Drawing 13452-1. These samples were obtained by Warzyn and analyzed by
WARZYN
February 16( 1990 2-8 13452.60
ENSECO/RMAL 1n accordance with Appendix D of the QAPP. Additional sampleswere obtained by the WONR from the Quam and Alme residences on February 23,1989.
Samples of cold untreated water were obtained by allowing the tap/faucet torun at least 5 minutes, or until the pump/pressure tank system had cycledseveral times. Results are presented 1n Appendix A.
[skb-600-02a]
WARZYN
SECTION 3RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION
Site-Specific GeologyThe site-specific geology was previously discussed 1n Tech Memo 1, based onthe Phase I Investigation and other previous Investigations. Boringsperformed during Phase II provide additional geologic Information over agreater horizontal and vertical extent, particularly 1n areas of potentialcontaminant migration.
Results of Phase II borings are generally consistent with the Interpretationof site geology previously presented 1n Tech Memo 1. The Site subsoils aredominated by 1nterstrat1f1ed sand (SP), sand and gravel (SP-GP) and sllty sand(SM). In the eastern portion of the Site, lean sllty clay was observed nearthe surface, to a depth of 18 ft at boring B18B. Sandstone bedrock wasobserved at depths of 46 to 73 ft below ground surface.
F1ne-Gra1ned SoilsIn addition to the 1nterstrat1f1ed silt, sand and gravel outwash several otherunits were observed during the soil borings (shown as wells on Drawing 13452-Fl). Boring logs for Phase II borings are presented 1n Appendix G. Clayeysand with some silt, Including seams of sllty sand and clay, was observed fromapproximately 50 to 65 ft at boring B26B. This unit may be related to thebrown-gray clayey silt observed from 47 to 45 ft at boring MW12, drilled 1n1982. A fine grained deposit of reddish-brown sandy silt was also observed atboring B16 directly above the bedrock (54 to 64 ft). If these deposits 1n thewestern portion of the Site are somewhat continuous, they may limit thehydraulic connection between the upper glacial deposits and the bedrock Inthis area.
The area! extent of the lean sllty clay observed at several Phase I borings Inthe eastern portion of the Site Is not well known. The reported occurrence ofthick (7-12 ft) sllty clay and clayey silt at several unsampled USGS boringswas not substantiated by nearby sampled borings (MW9 and B17A). The clay was
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-2 13452.60
observed at boring B25B In two distinct units separated by approximately 7 ftof Intervening sand (SP) and sllty sand (SM). The lower clay extends to adepth of 24 ft, and has many thin, steeply dipping sand seams. These unitscorrelate well with clay observed at Boring B19B, although the Interveningsand 1s thinner (2.5 ft) at Boring B19B.
The Dane County soil survey Indicates that the surfldal soils 1n the vicinityare comprised of the Batavla, Dresden, Kegonsa, Troxel and V1rg1l silt loamsoils and the Sable sllty clay loam. These soils are all similar 1n nature,being classified as ML, ML-CL or CL by the USCS. Most of the soils are welldrained or moderately well drained, except for the Sable and V1rg1l series,which are poorly and somewhat poorly drained, respectively. Refer to Drawing13452-B1 for approximate extent of the various soil units. Between 2.5 and 8ft of sllty clay or similar material are present at the surface at BoringsB16, B23, B26B, B27B, B29B, B30B and ESB1. These surfldal soils are notpresent at many other borings located 1n the fill area, gravel pit areas, andprevious residential sites, Indicating that the surficial soils were probablyremoved 1n these areas.
These two poorly drained units together are similar in extent to the claylayer which was discussed 1n Tech Memo 1 and probably exerts some control overgroundwater recharge, as discussed 1n the following section (Hydrogeology).Based on boring B18, B19 and B25B and the soils map (Drawing 13452-B1), theSable sllty clay loam appears to be present 1n the southeast portion of theSite, with the westernmost extent limited to somewhere between, andapproximately parallel to, the 860 and 870 ft topographic contours. Thisprobably also approximates the limit of the deep sllty material (> 4 ft) uponwhich the Sable 1s generally developed. The Virgil silt loam apparentlyoccupies the general area between the Sable and the 870 ft contour.
HydrogeologyWater LevelsGroundwater has been observed at depths ranging from approximately 3 to 46 ft1n the vicinity of the Site, approximately 20 ft below the ground surface nearthe disposal area. Monthly water level monitoring has shown decreasing water
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-3 13452.60
elevations over the past year, except for slight Increases during March andApril 1989 (refer to Appendix C). Water table elevations were generally about2 ft lower on October 23, 1989 than those observed on October 26, 1988. Staffgauge locations have been observed to be dry since July (STG1 and STG3) orAugust 1989 (STG2). Overall, water levels appeared to be approximately 3 to 4ft lower 1n fall of 1989 compared with data obtained 1n 1982, 1984 and 1986.
Horizontal FlowThe horizontal groundwater flow direction, based on water table elevations, 1sgenerally consistent with the data presented 1n Tech Memo 1. A water tablemap, based on September 26, 1989 data which Includes the new Phase II wells,1s presented on Drawing 13452-F13. The water table 1s generally controlledby topography, with flow away from the northern topographic high and possiblyfine grained soils 1n the southeastern portion of the Site. Groundwater flowbeneath the main disposal area 1s predominantly toward the southeast, withparticularly steep gradients 1n the southeast portion of the fill area. Thisarea of steep horizontal gradients approximates the contact shown on Drawing13452-81 between poorly drained surface soils (Sable and V1rg1l soils) andmore well drained surface soils areas lacking surf Ida! soils (gravel pitarea). The poorly drained soils reduce recharge to the groundwater systemresulting 1n lower groundwater elevations 1n this area, compared with thehigher Infiltration and observed groundwater mounding 1n the disposal andgravel pit areas. A notable round occurs near SCW5 and LH1, where surfacewater has been observed to collect 1n surface depressions. The transitionbetween these two zones appears to result 1n the steep horizontal gradientsand southeasterly flow.
The steep gradients may also be related to the occurrence of a lower unit ofsaturated sllty clay, which 1s associated with the surflclal clayey soils atBorings B18 and B25B. The lateral extent of this lower clay unit Is not welldefined, as discussed 1n the Site-Specific Geology Section, but the lowerhydraulic conductivity of this unit may Influence the horizontal flow and thedirection of the steep horizontal gradients observed across the fill area.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-4 13452.60
Based on Darcy's Law; m » K • 4y • AJ a decrease 1n hydraulic conductivity (K)will result 1n a greater head loss (-dh) over the same distance (dl), assuminga constant flow rate (Q) and area. Therefore, as groundwater flows fromhigher conductivity deposits Into lower conductivity (fine grained) deposits,more head loss would occur over the same distance 1n the fine grained deposit,resulting 1n a water table configuration as shown 1n Drawing 13452-F13. WhileIt 1s likely that the differences In groundwater recharge discussed above arethe dominant mechanism for controlling groundwater flow 1n the vicinity of thedisposal area, Increased head loss due to the transition between high and lowconductivity may also be Important.
Groundwater flow south of County Highway A appears to be generally southerlyto southwesterly, with fairly uniform horizontal gradients. The southerlyflow 1s consistent with flow 1n the southeast portion of the Site as well asthe area in general. The water table map suggests that groundwater 1s notlikely to flow from the main disposal area toward wells MW25 and P25B or thenearby drainage ditch. Therefore, the drainage ditch near well MW25 1sprobably not a potential migration pathway for contamination from the maindisposal area.
Vertical FlowAs discussed 1n Tech Memo 1, strong downward gradients are observed 1n thenorthern and central (disposal area) portions of the Site, with smallerdownward or fluctuating (upward or downward) vertical gradients observed inthe southern area. Vertical gradients calculated from water level dataobtained on September 20, 1989 and October 23, 1989 are presented In Table 7.The Installation of piezometer P26B has provided additional Information whichIndicates upward gradients at this location, Immediately southeast of the maindisposal area. This 1s consistent with the postulated reduction 1n rechargedue to poorly drained surface soils and the head buildup due to the finegrained materials at depth.
Phase II well nests south of the Site show small or zero vertical gradients.Based on these gradients, 1t does not appear that Sundby's pond functions as alocal groundwater discharge area; groundwater flow appears to be horizontal
WARZYN
February 16f 1990 3-5 13452.60
beneath the pond. Furthermore, the water elevation 1n the pond (854.56 ftMSL) surveyed on September 7, 1989 (staff gauge SG3 was dry) was slightlyhigher than the groundwater elevations measured at nearby Wells MW28 (854.44ft MSL) and P28B (854.43 ft MSL) on September 6r 1989, suggesting the pond mayrecharge the groundwater system.
Vertical gradients observed at well nest MW25/P25B are small and consistentlydownward, which suggests that the nearby drainage ditch Is probably not apotential groundwater discharge point. However, the affects of the summer1988 drought are still being observed. Interpretations based on datacollected during this period may not be representative of historic conditions,particularly with respect to observed groundwater/surface water Interactions.
In-S1tu Hydraulic ConductivitiesIn-s1tu hydraulic conductivities were determined for the seven newly Installedwater table wells (Table 2). Results were generally comparable to resultspresented 1n Tech Memo 1 for other Site wells. Values ranged from 7.3xlO"5
cm/s at well MW26, screened In sllty sand (SM) to 2.0x10-2 cm/s at wells MW28and MW29, screened 1n sand and gravel (SP-GP).
Sundbv Production WellsComputer simulations were performed to evaluate the possible Influence of theSundby Sand and Gravel production wells on current and historic groundwaterflow 1n the vicinity of the Site. A computer program (Walton, 1985) was usedto calculate the drawdown as a function of distance. Many of the assumptionsInherent In the model Involving the well geometry, aquifer characteristics andhorizontal flow do not directly apply to actual site conditions, however, manyof these effects resulting from this discrepancy are more Important close tothe well. For purposes of determining the approximate radius of Influence ofthe wells or the drawdown expected near the fill area (at a greater distancefrom the well), differences between model assumptions and actual conditionsare considered to have a minimal effect on results. Results are presented 1nAppendix I and summarized 1n Table 8.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-6 13452.60
Calculations were performed for hydraulic conductivity values ranging from10~3 to 10"2 cm/s, considered to be representative of average values at thesite. Information provided by Sundby Sand and Gravel Indicated that the BatchPlant Well was generally pumped from May through September at approximately3000 gpd (2 gpm). Based on this Information, drawdown near the disposal arearesulting from the Batch Plant Well 1s probably minimal (0.04-0.09 ft). Forcomparison, calculations were also performed for an arbitrary length of time(1000 days) to observe the additional effect of pumping beyond the 5 monthperiod. In this case, a substantial drawdown (0.43 ft) could be observed nearthe fill area for the lower hydraulic conductivity estimate, but drawdown 1sminimal (0.06 ft) 1f the higher estimate 1s used.
The Wash Plant Well has reportedly not been operated for at least 2 years,since before October 1987 (Greg Sundby, personal communication, 1989).Calculations were performed assuming the well was functioning as described bythe WDNR 1n 1980 (Appendix I). These estimates suggest that operation of theWash Plant-Well would likely have an Influence on water levels 1n the vicinityof the disposal area, and may have effected the groundwater flow at some timeIn the past.
Note that the September 26, 1989 water table map would be expected to Includewhatever effect the Sundby batch well has on the water table because the batchplant well was operating during that period. No difference attributable topumping between the water levels of the pumping and non-pumping months hasbeen observed 1n the past; however Phase II wells near the Batch Plant Wellhave only been monitored since September 1989. Future comparison of nearbywells (MW27 and MW30) with more distant wells may provide more directInformation on the possible effect of the Batch Plant Well pumping.
Historic Site OperationsIt 1s Important to note that the hydrogeology of the site may have beensubstantially different 1n the past due to site opporatlons. Differences 1ncover materials, site grading or diversion of runoff during opperatlons mayhave caused variations 1n recharge and surface water transport which are notobserved under present conditions. Also, transient events such as disposal ofbulk liquids may have occurred episodically, causing variations 1n unsaturatedand saturated flow, and groundwater chemistry.
WAR2YN
February 16, 1990 3-7 13452.60
Groundwater/Leachate Sampling ResultsSamples obtained from monitoring wells and surface water locations wereanalyzed for U.S. ERA TCL VOCs, U.S. ERA TCL sem1-volat1les (selectedsamples), selected metals and Indicator parameters. Results are presented 1nAppendix A, listed according to sample designations. Sample designationsbegin with the project Identifier code (HF). The next two letters of thesample designations Indicate the type of sample; either leachate (LP),groundwater (GW), or surface water (SW). The following letters and numbersIndicate the location, Including groundwater monitoring wells (MW),piezometers (P), source characterization wells (SCW), leachate head wells (LH)and staff gauges (SG). A summary of data quality and results 1s presentedbelow.
Data QualityThe quality of VOC and semi-volatile data was generally considered to bewithin acceptable QA/QC limits. Results for 2-butanone were qualified asunusable 1f undetected, or estimated 1f detected, due to failure to achieveminimum relative response factors during calibration. Methylene chloride andb1s(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate were detected 1n several of the blanks and sampleresults are qualified as appropriate. Phenols are qualified 1n sample GWMW22-02 and GWP22B-02 based on surrogate spike and matrix spike/duplicate results,respectively. Semi-volatile results for sample GWMW14-02 are qualifiedbecause the hold time was exceeded. Semi-volatile samples GWSCW2-02 andLPLH1-02 were not analyzed due to a problem during sample extraction andInsufficient volume to re-extract.
Results of Indicator parameter analyses for each sample, lead analyses forgroundwater samples, and metals analyses for leachate and surface watersamples have not been validated because the necessary duplicate and spikeanalyses were not performed by ENSECO/RMAL. However, these results areconsidered to have Interpretive value and are Included 1n the discussionbelow.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-8 13452.60
Volatile Organic CompoundsVOCs were detected 1n wells located 1n or near the fill area and 1n somedowngradlent piezometers. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was the most commonlyobserved compound, occurring at each location (19 wells) where VOCs wereobserved. Round 2 THF detections are presented on Drawing 13452-F14. Otherfrequently observed VOCs Include xylene and ethylbenzene. Other detectedcompounds Include vinyl chloride, acetone, 2-butanone, 1,2-dlchloroethene,benzene and toluene.
Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter NR 140 (NR 140) groundwater qualityEnforcement Standards (ES) were exceeded for the following VOCs:
• Vinyl chloride at wells MW9 and P26B;
• Xylenes at wells MW7, MW22, MW23, MW24, P22B, P17B and P17C;
• Ethylbenzene at wells MW22, MW24 and P22B;
• THF-at wells MW7, MW9, MW22, MW23, MW24, P7B, P17B, P17C, P22B, P26B,P27B and P28B;
• Toluene at P22B; and
• Benzene at P26B.
Exceedances at wells SCW1 to SCW5 were not evaluated because these wells arescreened directly below the waste to characterize the source of contamination.
Semi-Volatile Organic CompoundsSampling for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) was performed at selectedwells specified 1n Table 6. Benzole acid and phenols were observed 1n wellsSCW4f MW22, P22B located 1n or near the fill area, and downgradlent as farsouth as piezometers P17B and P17C. Concentrations were highest at SCW4, with29,000 ug/L of benzole add observed. Concentrations of benzole add and 2,4-d1methyl phenol at piezometer P17C and 2,4-d1methylphenol at P17B were observedbelow the Contract Lab Required Quant1tat1on Limit (CRQL). Phenol and 4-methylphenol were observed at the source, but not downgradlent. As discussed1n Tech Memo 1, these types of compounds are common products of municipalwaste decomposition. Naphthalene was observed at well MW22 at an estimatedconcentration of 7.00 ug/L (below the CRQL). No semlvolatlle compoundsregulated under NR 140 (I.e., dlchlorobenzenes) were detected.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-9 13452.60
Selected MetalsSampling for barium, lead and mercury was performed at selected wellsspecified 1n Table 6. Leachate and surface water samples were not filtered;these results Include the sum of dissolved and suspended metals. Mercury wasdetected at 0.2 ug/L 1n the leachate sample but was not observed 1n any of themonitoring wells or surface water samples. Lead was observed 1n the leachatesample at a concentration of 458 ug/L. Lead was detected 1n downgradlentwells MW27, P27B and P29B and at Sundby's pond at concentrations ranging from1 to 5.6 ug/L. Because lead was not observed 1n any of the other monitoringwells near the Site, these occurrences are probably not related to the Site.
Barium was observed In each of the monitoring wells and at surface waterlocations, generally at concentrations below the CRQL. Some higherconcentrations were observed near the fill area, with the highest level atSCW4 (900 ug/L), higher than at the leachate head well.
The following exceedances of NR 140 Preventive Action Limits (PALs) for metalswere observed:
- Barium at wells MW22, MW23 and P26B; and
- Lead at well P29B.
Enforcement standards for these metals were not exceeded.
Indicator ParametersAlkalinity values were somewhat variable, ranging from 174 ug/L at well MW18to 1840 ug/1 at MW30. Water table monitoring wells MW27, MW28 and MW30,located south of County Highway A each had high alkalinity values relative tothe wells located 1n the fill area and upgradlent. Elevated alkalinity may bedue to the production and disposal of ready-mix concrete at Sundby's Sand andGravel.
Chloride levels were generally low with slightly higher levels at somelocations 1n or near the fill area. Sulfate levels were also low, and sulfatewas generally undetected 1n the wells 1n or near the fill area. This lack ofsulfate near the fill area may suggest reducing conditions orcomplexatlon/reactlon of sulfur with other organic compounds.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-10 13452.60
Field measurements of pH( conductivity and temperature are summarized 1nTable 1. Field pH Is generally lower than 7 1n or near the fill area, withbackground values near 7.2. Conductivities are generally between 1200-2000umhos/cm 1n or near the fill area'and approximately 600 to 700 umohs/cmupgradlent of the fill area. The extent and magnitude of elevated specificconductance, and to a lesser degree pH, corresponds In almost every case tothe occurance of THF. Exceptions were observed at wells MW24 and P7B, whereTHF was observed but conductivities were within or below the upgradlent rangeof valves. Conductivities were somehwat higher than background at wells MW30,P29B and P12B, although no VOCs were detected at those locations.
Private Well Sampling ResultsPrivate water well sampling results are presented 1n Appendix A. Welllocations are shown on Drawing 13452-1. No VOCs were detected 1n any wellsexcept acetone In the Lee well duplicate sample. This compound was notdetected In the other Lee well sample and was detected 1n the trip blankobtained on March 2, 1989. Acetone was not 1n the trip blank obtained on theday the Lee well sample was obtained (2/23/89). Therefore, this detection 1slikely attributable to laboratory or field contamination. Aromatic compoundresults for the Fosdahl well were qualified as estimated, because the 7-dayhold time was exceeded. Results for 2-butanone results were qualified asunusable because of failure to achieve minimum relative response factorsduring calibration. A summary of historical private well sampling 1s provided1n the SER (Warzyn, 1988) and will be discussed 1n the RI report.
Comparison of Round 1 and Round 2 DataThe five source characterization wells and the leachate well were sampledduring Round 1 as part of the Source Characterization subtask and again duringRound 2 1n conjunction with the Groundwater Quality Assessment. The resultsfrom Rounds 1 and 2 are generally comparable, with slightly lower values ofmost parameters observed during Round 2.
Common VOC and SVOC compounds and concentrations are generally similar betweenthe two rounds. Overall, concentrations are slightly lower during Round 2 atmost locations; however, THF and xylene concentrations were substantiallyhigher (approximately 10 and 5 times, respectively) at leachate head well LH1during Round 2.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-11 13452.60
Lead and mercury were both lower at well LH1 during Round 2. These metalswere detected at well SCW1, but not 1n the duplicate during Round 1, and werenot detected at this well during Round 2. Barium concentrations weregenerally comparable or lower during Round 2.
Alkalinity, specific conductance and chloride were also generally lower atmost locations during Round 2.
Comparison of Groundwater Screening and Round 2 Sampling ResultsVOC sampling results from Round 2 well locations can be compared to previousresults obtained at or near the screened Interval during drilling, to evaluatethe effectiveness of the groundwater screening 1n selecting piezometer depthsand predicting water quality.
Concentrations of compounds were generally lower during the groundwaterscreening. In particular, THF was often undetected or below the methoddetection limit (BMDL) 1n the sample obtained during drilling, but observed asthe common or only VOC compound during Round 2 sampling (e.g. wells P17B, P17CP27B and P28B). This 1s probably due to the relatively high detection limitfor THF determined using the groundwater screening methodology (Appendix D ofthe QAPP). Because THF has a high affinity for water, It does not partitionInto the headspace as readily as most of the other target VOCs, resulting 1n arelatively high detection limit. The detection limit for THF determined 1nthe field on July 25, 1988 was 183 ug/L, compared to a CRQL of 5 ug/L forRound 2 analyses.
In contrast, some compounds, particularly ethylbenzene, were detected duringdrilling but were not observed 1n the Round 2 samples (e.g., P7B, P17B andP17C). Several detects of acetone and toluene 1n the screening samples appearto be Introduced by sampling or analysis, based on Round 2 results.
The best overall correlation between the sampling events was observed atboring B22B. The sample at 50 ft was obtained by purging 3 volumes of waterfrom the 4-1n. casing and sampling with a stainless steel bailer, because theHydroPuncn sampling tool was damaged. This location also showed the highestoverall level of contamination of the groundwater screening locations, which
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 3-12 13452.60
may have minimized the effect of any errors associated with the screeningmethods.
The most substantial lack of correlation was observed at piezometers P27B andP28B, where the occurrence of the THF observed during Round 2 was notpredicted by the groundwater screening. As discussed 1n Section 2, 1fcontamination had been observed during drilling at these locations, drillingand sampling would have continued 1n order to establish the zone of maximumcontamination. As previously noted, THF was anomalously low 1n many of thegroundwater screening samples relative to other compounds and Round 2 results1n several of the wells. Screening samples at borings B27B and B28B wereobtained using the HydroPunch to obtain 1n-s1tu samples without purging (referto Section 2). Attempts to obtain a sample from 45 ft at boring B28B failedbecause the HydroPunch was damaged. A groundwater screening sample from thelower portion of the screened Interval 1s not available for comparison toRound 2 sampling results. Rotary wash boring may have affected the Integrityof the HydroPunch samples, because the sample 1s obtained from an Intervalbelow the open hole without purging drilling water from the open hole.However, similar discrepancies between Round 2 THF results and Phase Iscreening results were observed 1n data obtained In well P17B, where thescreening samples were obtained using a Keck submersible pump and 4-1n.diameter Inflatable packer during Phase I.
[skb-600-02b]
WARZYN
SECTION 4EXTENT AND MAGNITUDE OF CONTAMINATION
This section addresses the current extent of contamination and the potentialfor migration via groundwater, Identified as the major potential migrationpathway 1n Tech Memo 1.
Groundwater FlowGroundwater flow appears to be the primary mechanism for contaminanttransport. Groundwater flow appears to be controlled by topography and thepresence or absence of lower permeability surflclal materials. Horizontalflow directions are generally from topographically higher areas north of theSite toward the low area near Sunday's pond to the south. Depths togroundwater vary from greater than 40 ft below the surface to within a fewfeet of the surface. Sunday's pond appears to be a surface expression of thewater table. Localized horizontal flow and vertical flow components appear tobe controlled to a large extent by the relative recharge rates, which are 1nturn controlled by the distribution of fine grained surflcal soils. Thecontact between somewhat poorly and moderately well drained soils or disturbedareas appears to exert some Influence over the water table contours (Drawing13452-F13). Vertical gradients at the Site are downward over much of thenorthern and central portions 1n areas where surflclal soils have beenremoved. Overall, Infiltration of rainwater through the unsaturated wastewith transport downward and laterally to the south appears to be the primarymechanism for migration of contaminants. This 1s consistent with the observeddistribution of THF (Drawing 13452-F14).
Groundwater QualityThe overall extent and magnitude of contamination appears to be defined byTHF, which exhibits the largest 3-d1mens1onal extent of both detections and NR140 exceedances. The areal extent of THF 1s shown on Drawing 13452-F14; across-sectional view of THF 1s shown on Drawing 13452-F12. In general, THFoccurs 1n both water table wells and piezometers near the disposal area, butonly 1n piezometers located to the south. Based on THF results, the center ofmass of the contaminant plume 1s located 1n the lower portion of the glacialaquifer and possibly the upper portion of the bedrock aquifer, south of theSite. This 1s Illustrated on Cross Section BB', Drawing 13452-F12. Thisdistribution 1s consistent with the Inferred groundwater flow pattern
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 4-2 13452.60
(Drawings 13452-F12 and 13452-F13). Higher conductivities are generallyassociated with the occurrence of THF, with a particularly strong correlationobserved 1n downgradlent piezometers P27B and P28B.
The overall extent of xylene contamination 1s somewhat less than that of THF.In particular, xylene was not observed 1n piezometers P278 and P28B, but wasobserved 1n piezometers P17B and P17C.
Ethylbenzene was observed at several wells located 1n or near the fill, buthas not been observed downgradlent of the fill area.
The southern extent of semi-volatile contamination 1s similar to that ofxylene. Only benzole add and 2-4-d1methylphenol have been observeddowngradlent of the fill area (piezometers P17B and P17C).
Elevated barium concentrations are generally restricted to the fill area, butwere also observed at piezometer P26B.
AttenuationThe extent of contaminant migration 1n groundwater 1s dependent on manyfactors related to the geologic matrix, the hydrochemlcal environment, and thephysical and chemical properties of the contaminants. Attenuation of theorganic compounds will be controlled primarily by adsorption on aquifermaterials and blodegradatlon. Using octanol-water partition coefficients andsolubilities of organic compounds as an Indication of their affinity forwater, organlcs observed at the Site are relatively mobile 1n groundwater.This 1s consistent with the postulated migration of contaminants from theunsaturated source area to the water table; less mobile compounds would tendto remain 1n the unsaturated zone.
THF is misclble 1n water 1n all proportions, and would generally be lesslikely than the other compounds to be attenuated by adsorption. This 1sconsistent with the observed extent of THF contamination, relative to othercompounds such as xylene and ethylbenzene. The affinity of THF for water andthe specific gravity of THF (0.888) suggests that THF Is transported as asolute and that the distinct vertical distribution of THF 1s not due todensity flow or phase separation.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 4-3 13452.60
Biochemical degradation of organic contaminants has been demonstrated for THF(BASF, technical Information, 1986) and each of the other major volatileorganic compounds present, (Verschueren, 1983). Factors which InfluenceblodegradlblUty Include various hydrochemlcal conditions, availability ofmicroorganisms and properties of the contaminants. However, 1t 1s difficultto estimate the Importance of natural mlcroblal action as an attenuationmechanism due to the complex Interaction between these factors and thediversity of microorganisms.
Prevalent mechanisms controlling attenuation of metals Include precipitation/dissolution, sorptlon and complexatlon. These mechanisms are Influenced byfactors such as pH, redox potential, Ugand concentrations and organic carboncontent of soils. Round 2 results suggest that attenuation mechanismsrestrict the mobility of lead and mercury. Lead and mercury observed 1n theleachate sample may be present 1n association with suspended solids.Therefore, filtered groundwater samples may not exhibit these metals, becausethey are associated with the solid phase. Barium occurrence Is limited by thesame processes, however, barium generally occurs at concentrations greaterthan trace levels. The solubility of solid phases containing barium and thepotential for cation exchange reactions may limit the concentrations of bariumdowngradlent of the source.
[skb-600-02c]
WARZYN
SECTION 5CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
The Site 1s located 1n an area dominated by glacial outwash composed primarilyof 1nterstrat1f1ed sllty sand and gravel. A zone of clayey material 1spresent near the surface 1n the southeastern area of the Site. A regionalbedrock high 1s present beneath the Site, with bedrock observed at a depth ofbetween 46 to 73 ft below the surface.
Regional groundwater flow generally follows the topography, from a groundwaterdivide located approximately 2 ml east of the site southwesterly toward theYahara River. Local groundwater flow 1s generally toward the south, withsoutheasterly flow 1n the southeastern portion of the fill area. Horizontaland vertical flow appears to be controlled by topography and by thevariability of groundwater recharge rates across the site. Groundwaterrecharge 1s Increased In the northern and central portions of the site byponding of run off water 1n local depressions, and decreased by poorly drainedclayey soils 1n the southeastern portion of the Site.
The main disposal area (refer to Drawing 13452-F11) contains a variety ofIndustrial and municipal waste Including plastic sheeting, paper, paper-coatedplastic, paint sludge, grease, rubber, wood, glass and scrap metal. A maximumof 15.5 ft of refuse was observed, with a minimum separation of approximately5 ft between the refuse and the water table. Compounds of concern observed atthe disposed area Include various VOCs, barium and lead.
Groundwater flow appears to be the primary transport mechanism forcontaminants. Water Infiltrates through the unsaturated waste and 1stransported downward and toward the south along primary groundwater flowpaths. Vertical gradients are downward beneath the fill area, but rapidlydiminish away from the disposal area and groundwater flow south of the Site 1sprimarily horizontal. However, vertical gradients may have been different 1nthe past during site operations.
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 5-2 13452.60
The extent of contamination downgradlent of the source appears to be limitedto the lower portion of the glacial aquifer and possibly the upper portion ofthe bedrock aquifer. Aj rly_naj rj3vcplume from tne source migrates southeastand southwest, but reconverges to'a southerly direction before migrating off-site. In general, organic compounds are the dominant contaminants. THF 1sthe only organic contaminant which 1s observed 1n off-Site piezometers.Xylene, benzole add, and 2-4 dlmethylphenol have been observed 1n piezometersnear the property boundary. Other organic compounds and barium were observedat levels above background near the disposal area. No contamination wasobserved 1n the nearby private water supply wells during this Investigation.
Surface water 1s not considered to be a major contaminant transport pathwaybecause surface water drainage 1s limited. Furthermore, 1t appears that thedrainage ditch east of the Site and Sunday's Pond are not groundwaterdischarge points based on water quality results and Inferred groundwater flowpaths.
Soils above the fill area are not likely to be transported due to the lack ofestablished eroslonal transport. Other surface soils are not consideredpotential migration pathways, because migration of contaminants 1n the fillarea 1s vertical, due to Infiltration through the unsaturated waste and soil.Surface soils 1n the fill area represent a potential exposure pathway, butexposure 1s minimized by limited access to the Site (I.e., fencing).
A1r 1s not considered to be a primary migration pathway for contaminationbased on available air quality data (unvalldated) and health and safety (H&S)monitoring. However, H&S monitoring Indicated that volatile organic vaporswere released during some activities which disturbed the waste area. Underexisting undisturbed conditions, It 1s unlikely substantial contaminantreleases to air are occurring.
[skb-600-02d]
WARZYN
SECTION 6RECOWENDATION FOR ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
The combined results of the Phase I and Phase II investigations have largelyfulfilled the following objectives of the Site Investigation:
• Define the nature and extent of contamination.
• Identify the potential contaminant migration and exposure pathways.
• Quantify the extent and magnitude of contamination along the primarypathways of concern.
However, the need for additional investigative work has been identified, toprovide additional information on the extent and magnitude of groundwatercontamination.
Additional Data RequirementsRecommendations for an additional investigation phase are based on the resultsof the previous investigations, consistent with the phased, iterativeapproach. Specific data needs are discussed below in the context of theresults of Phases I and II of the Site Investigation.
The vertical extent and magnitude of contamination, particularly downgradientof the disposal area, is not adequately known. Round 2 sampling has indicatedthat contamination is present at depth, downgradient (south) of the disposalarea. However, groundwater sampling while drilling did not provideinformation necessary to establish the maximum vertical extent ofcontamination or the zone of highest concentrations at locations wherecontamination was subsequently observed during Round 2 groundwater sampling(piezometers P17B, P17C, P26B, P27B, PW8B). Drawing 13452-F12 illustrates theavailable information on contamination south of the Site, and shows the extentand magnitude of contamination is not known below piezometers P17C, P27B andP28B. /°
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 6-2 13452.60
The horizontal extent and magnitude of contamination is not adequately known,particularly because THF has been observed in piezometer P28B, and nomonitoring has been performed immediately downgradient of this location. Inaddition, the horizontal extent and magnitude of contamination beyondpiezometer P28B cannot be estimated with any certainty, because the verticalprofile of contamination is not adequately known. For example, if theconcentration of the THF at depth below piezometer P28B is much higher thanthe observed 330 ug/L at the screened interval, the inferred extent ofcontamination beyond piezometer P28B would be greater based on inferredconcentration gradients.
Proposed Additional InvestigationThe objective of the additional investigation is to further define the extentand magnitude of contamination, particularly in the area downgradient of thedisposal area. As previously discussed, the relationship between thehorizontal and vertical extent of contamination is complex. Therefore, it isrecommended that the vertical extent of contamination be adequately defined atthe source initially during this investigation. This information will then beused to help select screen depths for additional piezometers at selectedlocations downgradient of the source.
The proposed work scope consists of the following activities:
• Soil sampling and/or rock coring, and groundwater screening while 21 cdrilling adjacent to piezometer P22B, followed by installation of oneor two deeper piezometers at this location;
• Soil sampling and/or rock coring, and installation of a minimum of 3deeper piezometers adjacent to piezometers P17C, P26B and P28B todetermine the vertical extent of groundwater contamination at thesethree strategic locations;
• Sampling of groundwater at piezometers immediately after installationand quick-turnaround analysis for selected VOCs (groundwater screening)to determine whether the vertical extent of contamination has beenestablished;
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 6-3 13452.60
• Installation of additional deeper piezometers at the same locations, ifdeemed necessary based on groundwater screening;
• Installation of a well nest south of piezometer P28B;
• Round 3 sampling of selected wells after new piezometers have beeninstalled and developed to provide adequate chemical characterizationfor the Feasibility Study.
The work will be performed using an iterative approach which involves usingresults from the initial work to evaluate the need for additional work.
Hell InstallationAt least one deeper piezometer (P22C) will be installed adjacent to piezometerP22B to further define the vertical extent of contamination near the source.Soil sampling and/or rock coring will be performed for the interval notpreviously sampled. Groundwater sampling while drilling will be performed,with quick turnaround analysis conducted according to ERA wastewater methods601/602. The data quality objective of this sampling is to select thepiezometer screen depth(s). The objective is the same as that of the previousgroundwater screening performed according to Appendix D of the QAPP, however,because the previous groundwater screening was not effective, particularlyfor THF, the method will be changed.
It is anticipated that two piezometers will be installed, one at the zone ofmaximum contamination and one near the maximum vertical extent ofcontamination. If groundwater screening results indicate that piezometer P22Bis sufficient to monitor the zone of maximum contamination (i.e.,substantially greater concentrations are not found below piezometer P22B),only one well will be installed.
A deeper piezometer will be installed adjacent to each of existing piezometersP17C, P276B and P28B. Soil sampling and/or rock coring will be performed forthe interval at each location which was not previously sampled. Piezometerscreen depths will be determined based on existing well depths, geology andgroundwater screening results at location P22B. No groundwater screening will
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 6-4 13452.60
be performed at these downgradient locations. Because each sample wouldrequire a 24 hr turnaround time using the 601/602 method, sampling of eachwell location is not feasible. Rather, sampling will be performed immediatelyafter well installation but before demobilization of the field crew (seebelow). Objectives are to establish the zone of maximum contamination and themaximum vertical extent of contamination at each location; this may requiremore than one piezometer at each location.
Piezometer PUD will be installed in bedrock below piezometer P17C wherecontamination has been observed. The anticipated separation between the twopiezometers screens is 25 ft, but may be modified if necessary based on thegeology encountered during coring. Piezometer P28C will be screened eitherdirectly above bedrock or within the upper bedrock depending on the depth tobedrock at this location and the groundwater sampling results at P22C.Piezometer R26C will be screened approximately 15 ft into bedrock to monitorthe upper portion of the bedrock aquifer. Installation of the piezometerdirectly above bedrock is considered to be less advantageous at this location,because the material is clayey sand and clay. In-situ hydraulic conductivitytests will be performed on the newly installed piezometers after developmentof the wells.
Quick Turnaround Time Sampling of New HellsImmediately after the piezometers are installed, they will be purged andsampled and the samples analyzed for previously analyzed VOCs, according tothe methods previously specified for groundwater screening while drilling atpiezometer P22C. This alternative method is proposed, because groundwaterscreening while drilling generally did not appear to provide adequateinformation necessary to determine piezometer screen depths during Phase IIdrilling. The data quality objective of this sampling is intended to providesemi-quantitative data on the vertical extent of contamination at eachlocation that can be used to determine whether or not additional piezometersshould be installed. For example, by the time the installation of piezometersP17D, P26C and P28C is completed, the results of the first groundwater
WARZYN
February 16, 1990 6-5 13452.60
screening sample (e.g., from piezometer P17D) can be used to determine whethera deeper piezometer (e.g., P17E) may be necessary to adequately determine thevertical extent of contamination. The process will be continued until enoughinformation has been gathered to estimate the magnitude of contamination andof the maximum vertical extent of contamination at each of the threelocations. This does not require that the actual vertical extent ofcontamination be determined by sampling until contamination is no longerobserved, but only that a trend toward decreasing concentrations is observed.
Additional Piezometer InstallationAs discussed, three piezometers (P17D, P26C and P28C) will be installed andgroundwater samples will be screened for VOCs to determine if additionalpiezometers should be installed. In general, if additional piezometers aredeemed necessary, they will be installed approximately 25 ft below the lowestexisting piezometer. Actual depths may be modified based on observed geology.If installed, these wells will be sampled as part of the iterative processdescribed above.
After the piezometer installations and quick turnaround time sampling has beencompleted at the above locations, this information will be used to locate apiezometer south of piezometer P28B. The location and screen depth of thispiezometer (P32B) will be selected to maximize the chance of interceptingcontamination. Soil/rock sampling will be performed as previously discussed.A water table we!l I_MW32) will also be installed at this location to provideadditional hydrogeologic information. Note that the location of this wellnest is conditional, pending access agreements.
Round 3 SamplingAfter the process of piezometer installation and groundwater screening iscompleted, the new piezometers will be developed and sampled, along with otherselected wells, for EPA TCL VOCs and field parameters (pH, specificconductance, temperature, color, odor, turbidity). Procedures will be asspecified for Round 2 sampling. Round 3 sampling results will be used todetermine whether the extent and magnitude of contamination has beenadequately defined to allow evaluation of remedial action alternatives.
VWU7ZYN
February 16, 1990 6-6 13452.60
Proposed Round 3 locations include the following wells:
Existing Wells Proposed Wells
MW17 P17DPUB P26CP17C P28CMW26 MW32P26B P32BMW28 + additional piezometers,P28B if installedMW22P22BMW30P30B
The objective of Round 3 sampling is to adequately establish the extent andmagnitude of contamination. Therefore, only existing wells which areassociated with new wells are proposed for resampling to facilitate comparisonof Round 2 and Round 3 data at these locations. An exception is well nestMW30/P30B, which is being resampled because of its close proximity to theinferred plume extent. Based on the previous lack of contamination observedat these wells during Round 2, these wells appear to be just beyond theeasternmost extent of contamination. The Round 2 results at the other wellsare considered sufficient to meet the objective of the Round 2 sampling. Theemphasis on Round 3 sampling is to investigate the extent and magnitude ofcontamination where it is currently undefined.
PFJ/j 1 v/GEA/AJS/OFK/DWH[skb-600-02e]13452.60
WARZYN
SECTION 7REFERENCES
Driscoll, F.G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells, 2nd ed. Johnson Division, St.Paul.
Patterson, G.L., 1985. Investigation of the Groundwater Conditions at theHagen Landfill Site, Stoughton, Wisconsin, U.S. Geological Survey.
Verschueren, K. 1983. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals,2nd ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.
Warzyn Engineering Inc., 1989. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study,Hagen Farm Site, Technical Memorandum - Number 1, Warzyn Job No. C13452.
Warzyn Engineering Inc., 1988. Site Evaluation Report, Hagen Farm Site,Stoughton, Wisconsin. Warzyn Job No. C13114.
Warzyn Engineering Inc., 1982. Hagen Property, Hydrogeologic Investigation,Stoughton, Wisconsin. Warzyn Job No. C10579.
Walton, W.C: 1985 Thirty-Five Basic Groundwater Programs for DesktopMicrocomputers "WALTON 84-35 BASIC", International Groundwater ModelingCenter, Indianapolis.
PFJ/skb[skb-600-02f]13452.60
WARZYN
TABLE 1
ROUND 2 SAMPLING-FIELD MEASUREMENTSHAGEN FARM RI/FS
TOWN OF DUNKIRK, HI
SAMPLINGLOCATION
MW7P7BMW9P12BMW14P14BP14B DUPMW16MW17P17BP17CP17C DUPMW18MW21MW22P22BMW23MW23 DUPMW24MW26P26BP26B DUPMW27P27BMW28P28BMW29P29BMW30P30BMW31SCW1SCW2SCW3SCW4SCW5LH1SG2SG3
DATE
9-7-899-7-899-8-899-7-899-7-899-7-899-7-899-8-899-6-899-7-899-8-899-8-899-11-899-8-89.9-7-899-7-899-8-899-8-899-7-899-7-899-7-899-7-899-6-899-6-899-6-899-6-899-6-899-6-899-6-899-6-899-8-899-8-899-8-899-8-899-8-899-8-899-8-899-11-899-11-89
FIELDpH
6.677.176.737.037.227.207.196.967.456.676.636.667.12 *7.066.386.706.456.466.486.986.476.507.25
--7.267.097.227.157.277.247.106.636.316.396.486.366.278.00 *8.52 *
FIELDSPECIFIC
CONDUCTANCE
7003801380620500500500500330790850850510450128012301200120059013001250125058078059080050061068051059019509601000260022001100382385
FIELDTEMPERATURE
141217.21513.51515151515131315.51415171717171814.514.51516.51815121316151616141614.5161722.522.5
SPECIFICCONDUCTANCE@25 deq C
89751416357756496256256254139881118111863057716001464142914297021512158215827259406861000676803829638720237812311220329126831310402405
NOTES:
* pH values are approximate due to difficulty in standardizing pH meter,Specific conductance @25 calculated using:
C25 = CT/(l+0.02*(T-25))Where CT = specific conductance at temperature T
PFJ/skb/VJR[ndj-401-28A]
TABLE 2
SUWARY OF IN-SITUHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTSPHASE 2 SUE INVESTIGATION
HAGEN FARM SITE RI/FS
Hydraulic ConductivityWell No. _____(cm/s)_____ Aquifer Type
MW25 6.3x10-4 Sand (SM)
MW26 8.1x10-5 Silty Sand (SM)
MW26 7.3x10-5 Silty Sand (SM)(Duplicate)
MW27 2.2x10-2 Sand (SP)
MW28 2.0x10-2 Sand and Gravel (SP/GP)
MW29 2.0x10-2 Sand and Gravel (SP/GP)
MW30 " 3.3x10-3 Sand (SP)
MW31 2.6x10-2 Sand (SM)
Hydraulic conductivities ere estimated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976)method. Water levels were lowered using a PVC bailer and recovery wasmeasured using a pressure transducer and data logger.
PFJ/skb/VJR[skb-401-97]13452.60
TABLE 3
SUHttRY OF LABORATORY SOIL TESTING RESULTSPHASE II - HAGEN FARM RI/FS
Sample
Boring
B22B
B22B
B25B
B25B
B26B
B26B
B27B
B27B
B28B
B28B
B29B
B29B
B30B
B30B
83 1
SampleNo.
4
10
3
6
12
14
2 .
11
2
8
2
14
2
10
11
BottomDepthIflL10
40
7.5
21
50
60
5
45
5
30
5
60
5
40
46.5
usesClassif.
ML
SM
CL
CL
SP
SM
ML
SP
GP/SP
SP-SM
ML
SM
ML
SP-SM
SM
GravelJ%i_0.0
20.1
0.1
0.0
16.2
1.7
0.0
8.1
55.1
0.0
1.5
22.2
0.4
8.7
20.8
SandM37.8
60.6
8.3
0.0
81.3
64.4
0.0
90.3
43.6
92.6
15.7
56.2
14.8
82.4
54.1
SiltClay
62.2
19.2
69.4/22.2
56.5/43.5
2.5
20.0/13.9
67.4/32.6
1.6
1.3
7.4
57.7/25.1
13.4/8.1
53.3/31.5
8.9
25.1
NaturalMoisture(%)
12.1
8.9
25.2
25.1
15.9
10.3
20.9
11.3
3.5
21.5
19.8
11.7
20.4
15.4
9.6
Loss onIgnition
(%)0.6
0.4
2.7
8.2
0.2
1.2
2.4
0.3
2.6
0.8
1.9
0.4
2.4
0.6
3.0
PFJ/skb/VJR[wpmisc-400-47]13452.60
TABLE 4
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING WHILE DRILLINGFIELD MEASUREMENTSHAGEN FARM RI/FS
SAMPLINGLOCATION
B22B
B25B
B26B
B27B
B28B
B29B
B30B
DATE
7-31-898-1-898-1-89
8-15-898-15-89
7-13-897-13-897-13-89
7-25-897-25-897-?6-89
7-27-897-27-897-28-89
8-14-898-14-898-15-89
7-24-897-24-897-24-89
DEPTH
3040 (1)50 (1)
30.540.5
344454
304051
253545
405060 (2)
354555
FIELD
7.216.826.98
7.887.74
7.517.15
7.847.668.05
7.667.80
7.888.067.43
7.437.81
FIELDSPECIFIC
CONDUCTANCE
82013601230
455385
750680
790935590
740610
*640580
705680
FIELDTEMPERATURE
23.515
16.9
18.621.8
2518
22.32220
2328.5
16.720
15.5
23.822.4
SPECIFICCONDUCTANCE<i»25 deq C
84517001468
522411
750791
835995656
771570
*711716
722717
-- Indicates sampling was attempted but sample could not be obtained withHydro Punch
* Insufficient volume prohibited analysis
All samples except (1) and (2) obtained with HydroPunch sampling tool
(1) Samples obtained by purging 3 well volumes with drill rig pump andsampling with a stainless steel bailer.
(2) Sample obtained by purging 3 well volumes with hand piston pump andsampling with a stainless steel bailer.
PFJ/skb/VJR[ndj-401-28b]13452.60
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF VOC SCREENING RESULTS FORGROUNDWATER SAMPLING WHILE DRILLING
HAGEN FARM RI/FS
Boring No..*
B7B
B7B
B7B
B12B
B12B
B12B
B12B
B16
Depth (ft) Sampling Date
35 9-6-88
45
55
28.5
38.5
48.5
58.5
9-8-88
9-8-88
9-9-88
9-9-88
9-9-88
9-9-88
29, 35, 40, 8-4-8945, 50, 55,60, 65
Compound
TetrahydrofuranEthyl Benzenem-Xyleneo+p-Xylene
TetrahydrofuranBenzeneEthyl Benzenem-Xyleneo+p-Xylene
N.D.
TetrahydrofuranTolueneEthyl Benzenem-Xyleneo+p-Xylene
TetrahydrofuranEthyl Benzenem-Xyleneo+p-Xylene
Tetrahydrofuran
N.D.
N.D.
Concentration(uq/L)
117604502060680
47501.94
15017.0166 (1)
BMDL2.76.152.932.9
BMDLBMDL
5.46.9
1110
B16
B17B
B17B
8176
71
18.5
28.5
38.5
9-6-88
9-6-88
9-6-88
AcetoneBenzene
N.D.
Benzene
N.D.
1430BMDL
BMDL
TABLE 5 (cont.)
Boring No.* Depth (ft) Sampling Date CompoundConcentration
(ug/L)
B17B
B17B
B17B
B26B
•
B26B
B26B
B30B
B30B
B27B
B27B
B27B
B28B
B28B
B22B
B22B
48.5
48.5(lab dupli-cate)
55
34
44
64
35
45
30
40
51
25
35
30
40
9-6-88
9-6-88
9-6-88
7-13-89
7-13-89
7-17-89
7-24-89
7-24-89
7-25-89
7-25-89
7-26-89
7-27-89
7-27-89
7-31-89
8-1-89
TetrahydrofuranEthyl Benzenem-Xyleneo+p-Xylene
TetrahydrofuranEthyl Benzenem-Xyleneo+p-Xylene
TetrahydrofuranEthyl Benzenem-Xyleneo+p-Xylene
AcetoneTHFBenzeneToluene
AcetoneTHFBenzeneTolueneo+p-Xylene
Acetone
N.D.
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
N.D.
THFBenzeneTolueneEthyl benzeneXylenes
AcetoneTHFTolueneEthylbenzeneXylenes
BMDL27001930810
BMDL750064903170
BMDL2.3
13.36.0
BMDLBMDLBMDLBMDL
BMDL592
1.34BMDLBMDL
BMDL
1.00
1.00
1.25
1.00
BMDL
1260010.52.60
5344700
BMDL513002686175900
TABLE 5 (cont.)
Boring No.* Depth (ft) Sampling Date
B22B 50
Field Blank
B25B 30,5
B25B 40,5
8-1-89
8-14-89
8-15-89
8-15-89
Compound
THFTolueneEthyl benzeneXylenes
THF
TolueneXylenes
TolueneXylenes
Concentration(ug/L)
31400236108010200
BMDL
BMDLBMDL
1.16BMDL
N.D. - No detects.
(1) estimated value; over calibration curve.
BMDL - detected below method detection limit.
* Only borings which exhibited detects are listed. Borings B13, B14, B14B,B15, B17, B18, B19, B20( B21 and B29 exhibited no detects. Only blanksand duplicates which exhibited detects are listed.
PFJ/skb/MCB[bcn-411-79a]13452.50
TABLE 6
PHASE II SAMPLINGHAGEN FARM RI/FS
Parameters Sampling Locations
EPA TCL VOCs and THF, selected metals MW14, MW17, MW22, MW27, MW28f(barium, lead and mercury), EPA TCL P14B. P17B, P17Cr P22B, P27B,Sem1-volat1les (BNAs) and Indicator P28B. MW31, SCW211), SCW4,parameters (alkalinity, sulfate and LHlU)chloride)
EPA TCL VOCs and THF, selected MW7, MW9r MW12(2), MW16( MW18,metals (barium, lead and mercury), MW21, MW23, MW24, MW26, MW29,and Indicator parameters (alkalinity, MW30, P7B, P12B, P26B, P29B,sulfate and chloride) P30B, SCW1, SCW3, SCW5r
NOTES:
(!) Wells SCW2 and LH1 were sampled for EPA TCL sem1-volat1les but thesamples could not be analyzed due to problems with sample extraction.
(2) Well MW12 was not sampled as proposed because the remains of a bird werefound In the well during sampling.
PFJ/jlv/GEA[Jlv-400-05]
Table 7
Summary of Vertical Hydraulic GradientsHagen Farm RI/FS
Well Nest
P6A/P6B
P8A/P8B
MW12/P12B
MW14/P14B
MW17/P17B
P17B/P17C
MW22/P22B
MW25/P25B
MW26/P26B
MW27/P27B
MW28/P28B
MW29/P29B
MW30/P30B
Vertical Hydraulic Gradient
9/26/89 10/23-24/89
0.06
-0.001
0.03
0.06
0.002
0.0
-0.02
0.004
0.01
-0.0006
0.0
0.003
0.004
0.06
-0.003
0.04
0.06
0.002
0.001
-0.02
0.002
0.02
-0.0003
0.0
0.002
0.003
(-) Negative values indicate upward gradients, positivevalues indicate downward gradients.
PFJ/skb/TAPB[skb-401-65]13752.60
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF COMPUTER SIMULATIONS -EFFECT OF SUNDBY PRODUCTION HELLS
HAGEN FARM RI/FS
Pumping Well
Batch Plant (4)
Wash Plant (5)
WellDischarge
(gpm)
2
2
2
2
56
56
Time(days)
150
150
1000
1000
240
240
Transmissivity(qpd/ft) (1)
800
16000
800
16000
800
16000
Calculated DrawdownsNear Disposal Area (2)
(ft)
0.07
0.04
0.43
0.06
3.71
1.19
Calculated DrawdownNear Property- Boundary (3)
(ftl
0.27
* 0.05
0.74
0.08
10.41
1.66
Notes
(1) Range in transmissivities determined assuming an average hydraulicconductivity of 10~3 to 10-2 cm/s and an aquifer thickness of 40 ft (atMW17) to 75 ft (at Sundby's).
(2) Well MW9 is at approximate southern boundary of disposal area, 900 ft away from Sundby Wells.
(3) Directly south of well MW17, approximately 500 ft away from Sundby wells.
(4) Average well discharge and pumping time for Batch Plant Well provided bySundby's Sand and Gravel (max 3,000 gpd from May through September).Calculations using 1,000 days presented for comparison assuming year-rounduse.
(5) Wash Plant Well has not been used since before October 1987 (Sundby).Input parameters are based on WDNR letter (Appendix J).
Calculations were performed using a computer program (Walton, 1985). Documentation and output is presented inAppendix X. Calculations assume a uniformly porous nonleaky aquifer with a constant thickness and a fullypenetrating well (Theis, 1935).
PFJ/skb/TAPB[bcn-411-29]
fin
WMI'S PROPOSED REMEDIAL SELECTION PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SARA
WORK PLAN
PH
AS
E
1
Consent Older and Slaiernentol Woik Negotiations
PH
AS
E 1
PH
AS
E
TASK 2
Work Plan Preparation 1 OAPrJ"
TASK B
Supplemental Work PlanPieparaiion
[ Sri
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
TASK 1
DeirnpiiSituation
ion Support and -j sER jin of Current k _ j J
t
TASK 3Sile Investigation
— * SuHlII 1.1 SourtlC hlllC»*'UM fift
*" »«"
-, ^^
^^^
kAUtk 5 J Cortintnart
TUB 1^r^
|
TASK 4Sile Investigation Analysis
Aisxiru e-MuHDn
SuOltk 12 Dill
SuCUU 1 3 Pitbnnir,
1^^ TASK S— 1 IMS \— Dralt Rl Report
nT]
— f
TASK 9
Supplemental Site InvestigationBench/Pitol Studies ^5
TASK 10Supple menialSite Investigation Analysis
SuUWIO 1 CuiUf| *,««:. £.,k-,««
1 SufllAk 1DJ Ofll1 SuHOtncj AAHrl4
SuluiMOa Fnil
i S TASK 11
[FINAL!
FEASIBILITY STUDY
TASK 6Remedial AlternativesScreening1 SuMUktlPnbnn.^| •'XM.1 Klrocg..*
Pi A»mil~«
SutUlh tJ miniScrHoing AJtmaliwi
TASK 7
Document
)___" ARRAY "j
TASK 12Remedial AlternativesEvaluation
SubtuklZ I O*liiM
£££2™.
TASK 13Final FS Repon ->@
WARZYN
Wort. Plan OAPP . OuMhr A»i«(»fte« Project Pan Rl . RtmM i lnmug*i«n fWpon FS - F»lw>*iy S«u*y Rtpon TM . Ttchiucal Memorandum SEfi - &!• EvaKni*n fl*pon FIGURE 1
LEGEND
DsC2, DrD2
VwA
DbA. DbD
DRESDEN SILT LOAM
VIRGIL SILT LOAM
SABLE S I L T V CLAY LOAM
GRAYS SILT LOAM
KEGONSA SILT LOAM
BATAVIA SILT LOAM
TROXEL SILT LOAM
NOTE
1. SURFICIAL SOILS MAP WAS DEVELOPEDBY ENLARGING DANE COUNTY, WISCONSINSOIL SURVEY MAPS, SOIL CONSERVATIONS E R V I C E . USDA, PAGE 154 AND PAGE 166.DATED 1972.
northD 1000 2000
SCALE IN FEET
ij
^S
I 1
5 , ss! ° -iL*
; ; s £ 5 Ps £ c 5 » ZS S 5 - B 8; « I 5 g I
REMEDIAL WVE STOAT ION/FEASBB iTy STUC"HAGEN FARM SITETOWM OF OUHKRKOAMF CC"INTV WISCONSN
W/\n^ T PI
jjfflTIS
nortrLTU-LT—T
EXISTING FEATURESAND GEOLOGICCROSS SECTION
Ei
1
ii
i
Ii
i
i
a
i
|!
f
^ I
1 1
f ' lI
^ 1X , 1
i :!
!!'
t
iglfsl|5sill
"^ <"<>-°~ . « .£Tw~~ F11
tMMOTH
r
S I I E I 3 I I i
: i £ 1 5 Ei———i———i———i———i———r
5 '-1———If!
i i
crTT~ h'-^TrrrI / 7 !/l (_]____I____|____I____1
pS"?• • • • ffl E3 Q
* 5 S i
MUM
* 1
* 83 »
wo f izCO
if- j
1T;
1
Ji«ui»a»iKcnH.*w»* > . WARZYN "^" * ""*«/». *— * rr=T
RCMED1AL INVESTIGATION / FEASIBILITY STUDYHAGEN FARU SITETOWN Of DUNKIRKflAAIF COUNTY. WISCONSIN
™"^ "•' '--"• fj. __ f I'——, *" if'"'**~ —— ^^ '
\lMUNUCt4
*-* •• •• •- -*P--——
ITfTM^!^^ L-±^^^Si-p^^^^^i- -^ f^r'-'fr, lii
w tun uiu ^JUiWKu IKAIIVI
•11.17 -«-«•«
-857- ST.%'
i « «1WO, im HE HIWU.
S-rt B*HCieH1ll*H mV TUfcJ.
northWAT p TABLE MAP
N KftflM SITE RI/FS
iI
>
i
WA
RZ
YN
i
1
i
i
|
. 1
^ 1t.
i i
F
2i 1ft s 1 ESz|8s 6 i *i l^a
~~ 'li.-m 1
i a imu" F13
jjjj.™
' 8iffil
MOTES
north ROUND 2 QROUNOWATERSAMPLING RESULTSHAGEN FARM SITE ffl/FS
Appendix AAnalytical Results
Al - Monitoring Well Sampling ResultsA2 - Private Well Sampling ResultsA3 - Surface Water Sampling ResultsA4 - Leachate Sampling Results
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.SUMMARY OF QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: Hagen Farms
Laboratory Qualifiers (Organic)
U The material was analyzed for, but not detected.
J Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used either whenestimating a concentration for tentatively identified compoundswhere a 1:1 response is assumed, or when the quality controlcriteria are not met.
B This flag is used when the analyte is found in the associatedblank as well as in the sample. It indicates possible blankcontamination and warns the data user to take appropriateaction. This flag must be used for a tentatively identifiedcompound as well as for a positively identified target compound
E The compound was quantitated above the linear calibration range
D The compound was quantitated from an analysis at a secondarydilution factor.
I The tentatively identified compound is an isomeric-type of thecompound reported.
C The tentatively identified compound refers to a class ofcompounds.
Data Validation Qualifiers (Organic)
U The material was analyzed for, but was not detected. Theassociated numerical value is the sample quantitation limit
UJ The material was analyzed for, but was not detected. Theassociated numerical value is an estimated quantity becausequality control criteria were not met.
J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity.
R The data are unusable (compound may or may not be present).Resampling and/or reanalysis is necessary for verification.
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.SUMMARY OF QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: Hagen Farms
Laboratory Qualifiers (Inorganic)
U The material was analyzed for, but was not detected.
K The associated value was greater than or equal to the instrumentdetection limit, but less than the contract required detectionlimit.
E Indicates the value reported is estimated due to the presence ofan interference.
S The associated value was determined by the method of standardadditons.
N Indicates the spike sample recovery is not within control limits
W Post-digestion spike for Furnace AA analysis is out of controllimits (85-115%), while sample absorbance is less than 50% ofthe spike absorbance.
Data Validation Qualifiers (Inorganic)
UJ Sample was analyzed, but not detected. The associated value isan estimated quantity because quality control criteria were notmet.
R The data are unusable (compound may or may not be present).Resampling and/or reanalysis is necessary for verification.
J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity becausequality control criteria were not met.
V The data was NOT validated.
Appendix AlHonltorlng Well Sampling Results
APPENDIX A1 Page 1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: GU Indicators MATRIX: Ground Uater
SAMPLE ID: HF-GUMU07-02 HF-GUMU09-02 HF-GUMU14-02 HF-GWMW16-02 HF-GUMU17-02 HF-GUMU18-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/07/69_________9/08/69_________9/07/B9_________9/06/69_________9/06/69_________9/11/89
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Alkalinity mg/l 605.00 V/ 775.00 V/ 823.00 V/ 397.00 V/ 268.00 V/ 174.00 V/Chloride mg/l 4.30 V/ 141.00 V/ 20.60 V/ 7.80 V/ 17.70 V/ 17.70 V/Sulfate mg/l 16.70 V/ 5.00 V/U 21.90 V/ 20.00 V/ 8.50 V/ 47.70 V/
APPENDIX A1 Page 2HAGEK FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: GU Indicators MATRIX: Ground Water
SAMPLE ID: HF-GUMU21-02 HF-GUMU22-02 HF-GUMU23-02 HF-GUMW23-92 HF-GUMU24-02 HF-GUHU26-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/06/89_________9/07/69_________9/08/69_________9/08/89_________9/07/89_________9/07/89______
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Alkalinity ms/l 177.00 V/ 908.00 V/ 745.00 V/ 366.00 V/ 446.00 V/ 758.00 V/Chloride mg/l 4.10 V/ 31.00 V/ 26.10 V/ 26.60 V/ 4.30 V/ 240.00 V/Sulfate mg/l 15.20 V/ 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 60.00 V/
APPENDIX Al Page 3HA GEN FARHS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: GU Indicators MATRIX: Ground Water
SAHPLE ID: HF-GUHU27-02 HF-GUMU28-02 HF-GUMU29-02 HF-GUMU30-02 HF-GWW31-02 HF-GUP07B-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/06/69_________9/06/89_________9/06/89_________9/06/69_________9/08/69_________9/07/69_____
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Alkalinity mg/l 996.00 V/ 1190.00 V/ 307.00 V/ 1640.00 V/ 340.00 V/ 270.00 V/Chloride n«/l 51.40 V/ 41.70 V/ 18.30 V/ 69.00 V/ 31.90 V/ 3.70 V/Sutfate mg/l 21.50V/ 20.10V/ 23.50V/ 33.60V/ 25.20V/ 17.40V/
APPENDIX A1 PageHAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: GU Indicators MATRIX: Ground Uater
SAMPLE ID: HF-GWP12B-02 HF-GUP14B-02 HF-GUP14B-92 HF-GUP17B-02 HF-GWP17C-02 HF-GUP17C-92SAMPLE DATE: 9/07/69_________9/07/69_________9/07/69_________9/07/69_________9/06/89_________&flfltf2______
COHPOUHDS UNIT
Alkalinity mg/l 393.00 V/ 314.00 V/ 313.00 V/ 525.00 V/ 565.00 V/ 566.00 V/Chloride mfl/l 38.60 V/ 13.30 V/ 13.10 V/ 56.90 V/ 66.10 V/ 66.80 V/Sulfate ma/1 24.70 V/ 30.60 V/ 31.20 V/ 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U
APPENDIX A1 Page 5HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: GU Indicators MATRIX: Ground Water
SAMPLE ID: HF-GWP22B-02 HF-GWP26B-02 HF-GUP26B-92 HF-GUP27B-02 HF-GUP28B-02 HF-GWP29B-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/07/89_________9/07/89_________9/07/89_________9/06/89 ______9/06/89_________9/06/69
COMPOUNDS UM1T
Alkalinity mg/l 724.00 V/ 843.00 V/ 838.00 V/ 490.00 V/ 495.00 V/ 376.00 V/Chloride mg/l 88.60V/ 67.50V/ 65.80 V/ 31.00V/ 59.70V/ 48.60V/Sulfate mg/l 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 21.80 V/ 13.70 V/ 25.60 V/
APPENDIX A1 Page 6HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPEl GW Indicators MATRIX: Ground Hater
SAMPLE ID: HF-GUP30B-02 HF-GUSCU01-02 HF-GWSCU02-02 HF-GUSCW03-02 HF-GUSCU04-02 HF-GUSCU05-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/06/89_________9/08/89_________9/08/89_________9/08/89_________9/08/89_________9/08/89______
COHPOUNDS UH1T
Alkalinity mg/l 324.00 V/ 347.00 V/ 278.00 V/ 676.00 V/ 394.00 V/ 337.00 V/Chloride m9/l 16.50 V/ 85.10 V/ 31.20 V/ 11.70 V/ 109.00 V/ 123.00 V/Sulfate ms/l 31.30 V/ 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U 5.00 V/U
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Quatifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:
HF-FB01-029/07/89
COMPOUNDS
BariumLeadMercury
UH1T
ug/lug/lug/l
2.70 /U1.00 /U0.20 V/U
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Ground Uater
HF-FB02-029/07/89
HF-FB03-029/08/89
HF-FB04-029/08/89
HF-GWMW07-029/07/89
2.70 /U1.00 /U0.20 V/U
3.00 UJ/UE1.00 Uj/UU0.20 V/U
3.00 UJ/UE1.00 UJ/UU0.20 V/U
136.00 /<1.00 /U0.20 V/U
Page 1
HF-GUMU09-029/QSY89
113.00 J/KE1.00 UJ/UU0.20 V/U
APPENDIX A1 Page 2HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Ground Water
SAMPLE ID: HF-GUHUK-02 HF-GWMU16-02 HF-GWMU17-02 HF-GWMU18-02 HF-GWMU21-02 HF-GUHU22-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/07/89_________9/06/89_________9/06/89_________9/11/69_________9/06/89_________9/07/69
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Barium ug/l 36.10 /K 53.20 J/KE 37.80 /K 108.00 /K 40.80 J/KE 482.00Lead ug/l 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.60 /K 1.00 UJ/UU 1.00 /U 1.00 /UMercury ug/l 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U
APPENDIX Al Page 3HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Ground Water
SAMPLE ID: HF-GWHU23-02 HF-GWMU23-92 MF-GUMW24-02 HF-GWMW26-02 HF-GUMW27-02 HF-GUMW28-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/08/89_________9/06/89_________9/07/69_________9/07/89_________9/06/89_________9/06/89_____
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Barium ug/l 334.00 J/E 337.00 J/E 186.00 /K 62.80 /K 168.00 /K 59.70 /KLead ug/l 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.00 /K 1.00 /UMercury ug/l 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U
APPENDIX A1 PageHAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Ground Water
SAMPLE ID: HF-GUMW29-02 HF-GUMW30-02 HF-GUMU31-02 HF-GUP07B-02 HF-GUP12B-02 HF-GWPKB-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/06/89_________9/06/69_________9/08/B9_________9/07/89_________9/07/B9_________9/07/89_______
COMPOUNDS UHIT
Barinn ufl/l 31.20 /K 86.20 /K 36.70 J/KE 48.20 /K 82.70 /< 35.50 /KLead ug/L 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.00 /UMercury ug/L 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U
APPENDIX A1 Page 5HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Ground Water
SAMPLE ID: HF-GUP14B-92 HF-GUP17B-02 HF-GUP17C-02 HF-GUP17C-92 HF-GWP228-02 HF-GWP26B-02SAMPLE DATE: _9/07/69_________9/07/69_________9/OB/89_________9/08/89_________9/07/B9_________9/07/89_____
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Barium ug/l 36.40 /K 103.00 /K 50.10 J/KE 49.20 J/KE 136.00 /K 456.00Lead ug/l 1.00 /U 1.00 /U 1.00 UJ/UU 1.00 /U 1.00 UJ/UU 1-00 /uMercury ug/l 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U
APPENDIX A1 Page 6HAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Ground Uater
SAMPLE ID: HF-GUP26B-92 HF-GUP27B-02 HF-GUP2BB-02 HF-GWP29B-02 HF-GUP30B-02 HF-GUSCU01-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/07/89_________9/06/89_________9/06/89_________9/06/69_________9/06/89_________9/08/89______
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Barium ug/l 460.00 46.40 /K 60.00 /K 52.40 /K 45.80 /K 662.00 J/ELead ug/l 1.00 /U 1.10/K 1.00 /U 5.60 1.00 /U 1.00 /UMercury ug/l 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/LJ 0.20 V/u 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U
APPENDIX A1 Page 7HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Ground Water
SAMPLE ID: HF-GUSCW02-02 HF-GWSCU03-02 HF-GUSCU04-02 HF-GUSCU05-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/06/89_________9/06/89_________9/08/89_________9/08/89_____
COMPOUNDS UM1T
Barium ug/l 796.00 J/E 292.00 J/E 900.00 J/E 837.00 J/ELead ug/l 1.00 /U 1.00 UJ/UU 1.00 /U 1.00 /UMercury ug/l 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U . 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.<2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChtoromettianeBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-DichloroethaneTotal 1,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1.2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1-Tr ichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1,2-D i ch Ioropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochIoromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-ttexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
10101010510555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX AlHAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Water
Page 1
HF-FB01-029/07/891.00
HF-FB02-029/07/891.00
HF-FB03-029/08/891.00
UNITS: ug/l
HF-FB04-029/08/891.00
HF-CUMU07-029/07/897.10
HF-GWMU09-029/08/895.00
5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ 7.00 U/B 36.00 U/BJ
10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 71.00 R/U
77.00
25.00 U/BJ
9.00 /J
50.00 R/U
1.00 /J 1.00 /J 1.00 /J
61.00
620.002200.00 /D 360.00
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneHethytene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-OichloroethaneTotal 1,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1.2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -Tr ichIoroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-0ichloropropeneTrichloroetheneD i bromochIoromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Hethyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
101010105in555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX AtHAGEH FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Water
Page
HF-GUMUU-029/07/89
1.00
HF-GUMU16-029/08/89
1.00
HF-GUMU17-029/06/89
1.00
UNITS: ug/l
HF-GUMW18-029/11/891.00
HF-GUMU21-029/08/891.00
HF-GUHU22-029/07/89250.00
S.OO U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ10.00 R/U
5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/8J 1300.00 U/BJ870.00 /J
10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 2500.00 R/U
4400.00
37000.0046000.00
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethytene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-DichloroethaneTotal 1,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1.2-Dichloroethane2-Butanooe1,1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneD i bromochIoromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
10101010510555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Water
Page 3
HF-GWHU23-029/08/8950.00
HF-GUMU23-929/08/B9so.oo
HF-GUHU24-029/07/89100.00
UNITS: ug/l
HF-GUMU26-029/07/891.00
HF-GUHU27-029/06/891.00
HF-GUHU2B-029/06/891.00
250.00 U/6J 250.00 U/BJ 500.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ10.00 R/U
10.00 U/BJ10.00 R/U
500.00 R/U 500.00 R/U 1000.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U
no.oo j/j960.006600.00
82.00 J/J
830.006400.00
1000.00
8500.00U000.00 6.60 J/
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Water
Page 4
HF-GUHW29-029/06/891.00 ___
HF-GWMU30-029/06/891.00
HF-GWHU31-029/08/891.00
UNITS: ug/l
HF-GUP078-029/07/895.00
HF-GUP12B-029/07/891.00
HF-GWPUB-029/07/891.00
COMPOUNDS CRQL
Chloromethane 10Bromomethane 10Vinyl Chloride 10Chloroethane 10Hethylene Chloride 5Acetone 10Carbon Disulfide 51,1-Oichloroethene 51.1-Dichloroethane 5Total 1,2-Dichloroethene 5Chloroform 51.2-D i chIoroethane 52-Butanone 101,1,1-Trichloroethane 5Carbon Tetrachloride 5Vinyl Acetate 10Bromodichloromethane 51,2-Dichloropropane 5cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5Trichloroethene 5Dibromochloromethane 51,1,2-Trichloroethane 5Benzene 5trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5Bromoform S4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 102-Hexanone 10Tetrachloroethene 51,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5Toluene 5Chlorobenzene 5Ethylbenzene 5Styrene 5Total Xylenes 5Tetrahydrofuran 5
5.00 U/BJ10.00 R/U
5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ 25.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ
10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 50.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U
310.00
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
APPENDIX AlHAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Water
Page 5
HF-GUPUB-929/07/89
1.00
HF-GUP17B-029/07/89250.00
HF-GWP17C-029/08/89200.00
UNITS: ug/l
HF-GUP17C-929/08/89200.00
HF-GUP22B-029/07/89500.00
HF-GUP26B-029/07/892.50
COMPOUNDS CRQL
Chloromethane 10Bromomethane 10Vinyl Chloride 10Chloroethane 10Methylene Chloride 5Acetone 10Carbon Disulfide 51,1-D ichloroethene 51.1-Dichloroethane 5Total 1,2-Dlchloroethene 5Chloroform 51.2-Dichloroethane 52-Butanone 101,1,1-Tr i chIoroethane 5Carbon Tetrachloride 5Vinyl Acetate 10Bromodichloromethane 51,2-Dichloropropane 5cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5Trichloroethene 5Dibromochloromethane 51,1,2-Trichloroethane 5Benzene 5trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5Bromoform 54-Methyl-2-Pentanone 102-Hexanone 10Tetrachloroethene 51,1,2,2* Tet rachIoroethane 5Toluene 5Chlorobenzene 5Ethylbenzene 5Styrene 5Total Xytenes 5Tetrahydrofuran 5
5.00 U/BJ 1300.00 U/BJ 1000.00 U/BJ 1000.00 U/BJ 2500.00 U/BJ14000.00
40.00
13.00 U/BJ
10.00 R/U 2500.00 R/U 2000.00 R/U 2000.00 R/U 61000.00 J/ 25.00 R/U
6.00 /J
2100.0027000.00
1400.0020000.00
1500.0022000.00
550.00 /J
1900.00 /J
13000.0036000.00
4.00 /J4800.00 /D
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChloromethaneBromome thaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneHethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-DichloroethaneTotal 1,2-OichloroetheneChloroform1.2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneD i bromochIoromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
10101010510555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: VolatUes MATRIX: Ground Water
Page 6
HF-GUP26B-929/07/892.50
HF-GUP27B-029/06/89
1.00 ____
HF-GWP2BB-029/06/89
1.00
UNITS: ug/l
HF-GUP29B-029/06/89
1.00
HF-GUP30B-029/06/89
1.00
HF-GUSCW01-029/08/89
10.00
44.00
13.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ10.00 R/U
25.00 R/U 10.00 R/U
5.00 U/BJ10.00 R/U
7.00
10.00 R/U
5.00 U/BJ10.00 R/U
5.00 U/BJ 50.00 U/BJ
10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 100.00 R/U
8.00 /J
5.00 /J5500.00 /D
4.00 /J
72.00 330.00 /D
49.00 /J
30.00 /J1600.00
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Bisulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-DichloroethaneTotal 1,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1.2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneD i bronwchIoromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenz«neStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
10101010510555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX AlHAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Uater
Page 7
HF-GWSCW02-029/08/B92.00
HF-GUSCW03-029/08/89100.00 ____
HF-GUSCW04-029/08/8920000.00
UNITS: ug/l
HF-GUSCU05-029/08/8925.00
HF-TB01-029/06/891.00
HF-TB02-029/07/891.00
10.00 U/BJ 500.00 U/BJ 38000.00 U/BJ 130.00 U/BJ S.OO U/BJ
20.00 R/U 1000.00 R/U 3000000.00 J/ 250.00 R/U 10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U
15.00
99.00150.00
220.00 /J
11000.0014000.00
32000.00 /J280000.00 3500.00
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethytene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-DichloroethaneTotal 1,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1.2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneD i bromochIoromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTet rach I oroetherte1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
10101010510555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX A1ttAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatites MATRIX: Ground Water
Page 8
UNITS: ug/l
HF-TB03-029/08/891.00
HF-TB04-029/11/891.00
7.00 U/B 5.00 U/BJ
10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U
1.00 /J
Data Validatii
SAMPLE 10:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
Phenolbis(2-Chloroethyl)ether2-Chlorophenol1.3-Dichlorobenzene1.4-DichlorobenzeneBenzyl alcohol1,2-Oichlorobenzene2-Methylphenolbis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether4-MethylphenolN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamineHexachIoroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-Nitrophenol2,4-OimethylphenolBenzoic acidbis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachlorobutadiene4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-MethylnaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-ChIoronaph thaIene2-NitroaniIineDimethytphthalateAcenaphthylene2,6-Oinitrotoluene3-NitroanilineAcenaphthene2,4-Oinitrophenol4-NitrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneDiethylphthalate4-ChIorophenyl-phenyt etherFluorene4-NitroaniIine4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenolN-Nitrosodiphenylamine(1>4-Bromophenyl-phenyI etherHexachIorobenzenePentachlorophenolPhenanthrene
CRQL
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Semi-Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Water
Page 1
HF-GUMUK-029/07/891.06
1010101010101010to10101010101010so1010101010101010101050105010105010505010101010101050501010105010
11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U1 1 .00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U1 1 .00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U1 1 .00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U53.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U
HF-GUMU17-029/06/891.10
HF-GUHU22-029/07/89
2.20
22.00 UJ/U
22.00 UJ/U
22.00 UJ/U
12.00 J/J
22.00 UJ/U110.00 J/150.00
22.00 UJ/U
7.00 /J
22.00 UJ/U
22.00 UJ/U110.00 UJ/U
110.00 UJ/U110.00 UJ/U
110.00 UJ/U
110.00 UJ/U
UNITS: ug/l
HF-GUHU27-029/06/891.10
HF-GUMU2B-029/06/891.00
HF-GUMU31-029/08/891.10
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Semi-Voletjles MATRIX: Ground Uater
Page 2
UNITS: ug/l
COHPOUNDS
AnthraceneDi-n-butylphthalateFluoranthenePyreneButylbenzylp3,3'-DicMorBenzo(a)anthraceneChrysenebis(2-EthylDJ-n-octylphthalateBenzo(b)fluoraBenzo(k)f luora.Benzo(a)pyrene
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
ilate
lalate>nzidineene
-Dphthalateilateitheneithene
Dpyreneiracene•ylene
CRQL
1010101010?010101010101010101010
HF-GUMUU-02 HF-GWHU17-02 HF-GUHU22-029/07/89 9/06/89 9/07/89
1.06 1.10 2.20
11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U21.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U67.00 UJ/B 11.00 U/BJ 22.00 U/BJ11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U11.00 UJ/U
HF-GWMU27-02 HF-GUHW28-029/06/89 9/06/89
1.10 1.00
11.00 U/BJ 10.00 U/l
HF-GUMU31-029/08/89
1.10
11.00 U/BJ
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
Phenolbis<2-Chloroethyt)ether2-Chlorophenol1.3-Dichlorobenzene1.4-DichlorobenzeneBenzyl alcohol1,2-Dichlorobenzene2-Methylphenolbis(2-ChloroisopropylJether4-MethylphenolN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamineHexachIoroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-Hitrophenol2,4-DimethylphenolBenzoic acidbis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane2,4-Dichlorophenot1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroaniUneHexachtorobutadiene4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-HethylnaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-Chloronaphthalene2-NitroanilineDimethylphthalateAcenaphthylene2,6-Dinitrotoluene3-NitroaniIineAcenaphthene2,4-Dinitrophenol4-NitrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneDiethylphthatate4-Chlorophenyl-phenytetherFluorene4-NitroaniIine4.6-0initro-2-methyl phenolN-Nitrosodiphenylaraine(l)4-Bromophenyl-phenyletherHexachlorobenzenePentachlorophenolPhenanthrene
CRQl
10101010101010101010101010101010501010101010101010101050105010105010505010101010101050501010105010
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Semi-Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Uater
Page 3
HF-GUP14B-029/07/891.06
HF-GUP14B-929/07/891.04
HF-GUP17B-029/07/891.06
UNITS: ug/l
HF-GUP17C-029/08/891.06
HF-GUP17C-929/08/891.12
HF-GWP22B-029/07/8910.00
37.00 J/J
100.00 J/
5.00 /J 14.00 J/7.00 J/J
10.00 J/J240.00 /J
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CROL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
AnthraceneDi-n-butylphthalateF LuoranthenePyreneButylbenzylphthalate3,3'-DichlorobenzidineBenzo(a)anthraceneChrysenebis<2-Ethyltiexyl)phthalateDi-n-octylphthatateBenzo(b)fluoranthene6enzo(k)fluorantheneBenzo(a)pyreneIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreneDibenz(a,h)anthracene8enzo(g,h,i)perylene
CRQL
10101010102010101010101010101010
APPENDIX AtHAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Semi-Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Water
Page
HF-GUPKB-029/07/89
1.06
HF-GUPHB-929/07/89
1.04
HF-GWP17B-029/07/891.06 ____
UNITS: ug/L
HF-GUP17C-029/08/89
1.06
HF-GWP17C-929/08/89
1.12
HF-GUP22B-029/07/89
10.00
11.00 U/8J U.OO U/B 11.00 U/BJ 54.00 U/B 11.00 U/BJ 100.00 U/BJ
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Semi-Volat«les MATRIX: Ground Water
Page 5
UNITS: ug/l
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CROL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
Phenolbis(2-Chloroethyl)ether2-Chlorophenol1.3-Dichlorobenzene1.4-DichlorobenzeneBenzyl alcohol1,2-Dichlorobenzene2-Methytphenolbis<2-Chloroisopropyl)ether4-MethylphenolN-Nitroso-di-tv propylamineHexachIoroethaneNitrobenzeneIsophorone2-Nitrophenol2,4-DimethylphenolBenzoic acidbi s(2-Chloroethoxy)methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachIorobutadiene4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-HethylnaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenoi2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-ChIoronaphthaiene2-NitroanilineDimethylphthalateAcenaphthylene2,6-Dinitrotoluene3-NitroanilineAcenaphthene2,4-Oinitrophenol4-Ntti*ophenolDibenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneDiethylphthalate4-Chlorophenyl-phenyletherFluoreneA-NitroaniIine4,6-Oini tro-2-methylphenolN-Ni trosodiphenylamine(l)4-Bromophenyl-phenyletherHexachIorobenzcnePentachlorophenotPhenanthrenc
CRQL
10101010101010101010101010101010501010101010101010101050105010105010505010101010101050501010105010
HF-GUP27B-029/06/891.10
HF-GUP28B-029/06/891.10
HF-GUSCW04-029/08/89110.00 __
2600.00
3400.00
330.00 /J29000.00
APPENDIX A1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Semi-Volatiles MATRIX: Ground Uater
Page 6
UNITS: ug/l
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS CRQL
Anthracene 10Di-n-butylphthalate 10Fluoranthene 10Pyrene 10Butylbenzylphthatate 103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 20Benzo(a)anthracene 10Chrysene 10bis(2-EthythexyL)phthalate 10Oi-n-octylphthalate 10Benzo(b)fluoranthene 10Benzo(k)fluoranthene 10Benzo(a)pyrene 10lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 10Benzo(g,h,i)pery(ene 10
HF-GWP27B-029/06/891.10
HF-GWP28B-Q29/06/891.10
HF-GWSCW04-029/08/89110.00
11.00 U/BJ 11.00 U/BJ 1100.00 U/BJ
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.SUMMARY OF TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY SAMPLE ID
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: - Hagen Farms - Round 2MATRIX: Ground Water
8-Nov-1989Page 1
SAMPLEID
HF-GWMW22-02
ANAL.TYPE COMPOUND
TBNA UnknownTBNA UnknownTBNA UnknownTBNA UnknownTBNA UnknownTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Bicyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-one,
1,3,3-trimethyl-TBNA Cyclohexanemethanol, .Alpha.,
.Alpha., 4-trimethyl-TBNA Bicyclo[2.2.1J heptan-2-one,
1,7,7-trimethyl-TBNA Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl-TBNA Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl-TBNA Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl -TBNA 2-Propanol,
l-[2-(2-methoxy-l-methylethoxyJ-l-methylethoxyl-
TBNA Phosphoric acid tributyl esterTBNA 2,4-Pentanediol, 2-methyl-TBNA Benzene, l-ethyl-3-methyl-TBNA Phenol, 3,5-dimethyl-TBNA 2-Propanol,
l-(2-methoxy-l-methylethoxy)-TBNA Butanoic acid,
3-hydroxy-3-methyl-
CONC. UNITS DVQ
170.00074.000250.00046.00046.00090.00040.00040.000
360.000
73.000
49.00057.000170.000260.000
91.000130.000130.00060.00042.000
ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1
ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1
44.000 ug/1
LQ
JJJJJCJCJCJ
IJ
IJ
IJIJIJCJ
JIJIJIJIJ
CJ
HF-GWMW27-02TBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Ethanol,
2,2'-[oxybis(2,l-et...
25.00017.0009.000
ug/1ug/1ug/1
CJCJIJ
HF-GWMW31-02TBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Ethanol,
2,2'-[oxybis(2,l-et...TBNA Ethanol,
2,2'-[oxybis(2,l-et...TBNA Ethanol,
2-[2-(ethenyloxy)ethoxy]
36.00058.000
58.000
27.000
ug/1ug/1ug/1
ug/1
CJIJIJIJ
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.SUMMARY OF TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY SAMPLE ID
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: Hagen Farms - Round 2MATRIX: Ground Water
8-Nov-1989Page 2
SAMPLEID
ANALTYPE COMPOUND CONC. UNITS DVQ LQ
HF-GWP17B-02TBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated -HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Phosphoric acid, triethyl
esterTBNA Cyclohexanemethanol. .Alpha.,
.Alpha., 4-trimethyl-TBNA 8icyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-one,
1,7,7-trimethyl-TBNA Benzoic acid,
4-(l,l-dimethylethyl-)TBNA 2-Propanol,
l-r2-(2-methoxy-l-methylethoxy)-I-methy1ethoxy]-
T8NA 2-Propanol,1-[2-(2-methoxy-l-methylethoxy)-I-methylethoxy3-
TBNA Hexane, 2-bromo-TBNA Aromatic HydrocarbonTBNA 1-Propanol,
2-(2-hydroxypropoxy)-TBNA 1-Propanol,
2-(2-nydroxypropoxy)-TBNA 2-Propanol,
l,r-[(l-methyl-l,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-
TBNA 2-Propanol,l,r-[(l-methyl-l,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-
TBNA 2-Propanol,l,r-[(l-methyl-I,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-
ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1
15.00021.00015.00016.00014.00014.00011.00028.000
68.000
18.000 ug/1
33.000 ug/1
53.000 ug/1
150.000 ug/1
12.000 ug/114.000 ug/120.000 ug/1
13.000 ug/1
28.000 ug/1
47.000 ug/1
59.000 ug/1
CJCJCJCJCJCJCJIJIJIJIJIJ
IJ
IJCJIJIJIJ
IJ
IJ
HF-GWP17C-02TBNA UnknownTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated Hydrocarbon
11.000 ug/126.000 ug/111.000 ug/1
JCJCJ
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.SUMMARY OF TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY SAMPLE ID
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: Hagen Farms - Round 2MATRIX: Ground Water
8-Nov-1989Page 3
SAMPLEID
ANAL.TYPE COMPOUND
TBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Cyclohexanemethanol, .Alpha.,
.Alpha., 4-trimethyl-TBNA Bicyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-one,
1,7,7-trimethyl-T8NA Bicyclo[3.1.1] heptan-2-one,
3,6,6-trimethyl-TBNA Benzole acid,
4-(l,l-dimethylethyl-)TBNA 2-Propanol,l-[2-(2-methoxy-l-methylethoxy
)-l-methylethoxy]-TBNA 2-Propanol,
!,!'-[(1-methyl-1,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-
TBNA 2-Propanol,l-(2-methoxy-l-methylethoxy)-
TBNA 2-Propanol,l-[2-(2-methoxy-methylethoxy)l-methylethoxy]-
TBNA 2-Propanol,l-[2-(2-methoxy-methylethoxy)l-methylethoxy]-
TBNA Azetidine, 1-nitroso-TBNA Diphosphoric acid, tetraethyl
esterTBNA 2-Propanol,
l-[1-methyl-2-(2-propenyloxy)ethoxy]-
CONC. UNITS DVQ LQ
CJCJCJCJCJIJIJIJIJIJ
IJ
IJIJ
IJ
11.00020.00014.00014.00015.00055.000
12.000
11.000
42.000
13.000
43.000
66.000
53.000
140.000
21.00017.000
ug/lug/lug/lug/lug/lug/lug/lug/lug/lug/l
ug/l
ug/lug/l
ug/l
ug/lug/l
32.000 ug/1
IJIJ
IJ
HF-GWP17C-92TBNA UnknownTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Cyclohexanemethanol, .Alpha.,
.Alpha., 4-trimethyl-TBNA Bicyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-one,
1,7,7-trimethyl-
12.00011.00014.00025.00022.00059.000
ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/lug/1ug/l
11.000 ug/l
JCJCJCJCJIJIJ
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.SUMMARY OF TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY SAMPLE ID
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: Hagen Farms - Round 2MATRIX: Ground Water
S-Nov-1989Page 4
SAMPLEID
HF-GWP22B-02
ANAL.TYPE
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNA
TBNATBNA
TBNATBNATBNATBNA
TBNATBNATBNATBNATBNA
COMPOUND
Bicyclo[3.1.1] heptan-2-one,3,6,6-trimethyl-Benzoic acid,4-(l,l-dimethylethyl-)1-Propanol,2-(2-hydroxypropoxy)-1-Propanol,2-(2-hydroxypropoxy)-1-Propanol,2-(2-hydroxypropoxy)-2-Propanol,l,r-[(l-methyl-l,Z-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-2-Propanol,l,r-[(l-methyl-l,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-2-Propanol,l,r-[(l-methyl-l,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-2-Propanol,l,r-[(l-methyl-l,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-2-Propanol,l,l'-[(l-methyl-l,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)bis-2-Propanol,l-[2-(2-methoxy-methylethoxy)l-methylethoxy]-Azetidine, 1-nitroso-Diphosphoric acid, tetraethylester
Oxygenated HydrocarbonOxygenated HydrocarbonOxygenated HydrocarbonCyclohexanemethanol. .Alpha.,.Alpha., 4-trimethyl-Cyclopentanol, 2-methyl-Hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-2,4-Pentaned1ol, 2-methyl-Pentanoic acid, 2-methyl-Benzenepropanoic acid
CONC.
11.00016.000
37.000
15.000
23.000
67.000
11.000
56.000
33.000
11.000
190.000
21.00015.000
90.000140.000260.000300.000
1700.00084.000150.000180.00085.000
UNITS
ug/1
ug/1ug/1
ug/1
ug/1ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1ug/1
ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1
DVQ LQ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJIJ
CJCJCJIJIJIJIJIJIJ
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.SUMMARY OF TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY SAMPLE ID
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: Hagen Farms - Round 2MATRIX: Ground Water
8-Nov-1989Page 5
SAMPLEID
ANAL,TYPE
TBNA
TBNA
COMPOUND
2-Propanol,l-(2-methoxy-l-methy1ethoxy)Propanedioic acid, phenyl-
CONC.
110.000
110.000
UNITS
ug/1ug/i
DVQ LQ
IJ
IJ
HF-GWP30B-02TVOA Hexane 8.800 ug/1
HF-GWSCW02-02
HF-GWSCW04-02
TVOA Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl-TVOA Benzene, l-ethyl-2-methyl-TVOA Benzene, 1,3-dichloro-
TBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Oxygenated HydrocarbonTBNA Cyclohexanemethanol, .Alpha.,
.Alpha., 4-trimethyl-TBNA Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-TBNA Cyclopentanol, 2-methyl-TBNA Hexanoic acid, 2-methylTBNA Hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-TBNA Cyclohexanone (ACN)TBNA 2,4-Pentanediot, 2-methyl-TBNA Pentanoic acid, 2-methyl-TBNA Pentanoic acid, 4-methyl-TBNA Cyclohexanecarboxylic acidTBNA Benzeneacetic addTBNA Benzenepropanoic acidTBNA 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid
diisooctyl ester
5.1005.20011.000
1900.0001200.000980.000
3300.00079000.0005500.00014000.00020000.0003300.0006100.0001800.0002600.0002600.0005100.0001500.000
ug/1ug/1ug/1
ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1ug/1
IJIJIJ
CJCJIJIJIJIJIJJIJIJIJIJIJIJIJ
-ft
Appendix A2
Private Well Sampling Results
SAMPLE 10:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChloromethaneBromome thaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneHethytene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-DichloroethaneTotal 1,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1.2-0 i chloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1,2-D i chIoropropanecis-1,3-0ichloropropeneTrichtoroetheneD ibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
10101010510555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX A2HAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatites MATRIX: Private Well
Page
UNITS: ug/l
HF-SUNDBY-HOME9/11/891.00
HF-SUNDBY-PLANT9/11/891.00
5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ
10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
Appendix A3
Surface Water Sampling Results
APPENDIX A3 Page 1HAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: GU Indicators MATRIX: Surface Water
SAMPLE 10: HF-SUSG02-02 HF-SUSG03-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/11/89__________9/11/69_____
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Alkalinity mg/l 121.00 V/ 175.00 V/Chloride mg/l H.20 V/ 27.50 V/Sulfate mg/l 52.00 V/ 5.00 V/U
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER 10 TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
APPENDIX A3 Page 1HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Surface Water
SAMPLE ID: HF-SUSG02-02 HF-SWSG03-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/11/69_________9/11/89_____
COMPOUNDS UM1T
Barium ug/l 73.30 V/K 66.90 V/KLead ug/t 1.00 V/U 2.40 V/KMercury ug/l 0.20 V/U 0.20 V/U
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers <Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChloromethaneBromome thaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneHethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-DichloroethaneTotal 1,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1.2-D)chloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideVinyl AcetateBromodichloromethane1,2-D i chIoropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneD i bromochIoromethane1,1,2-TrichtoroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
10101010510555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX A3HAGEN FARHS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Surface Water
Page 1
UNITS: ug/l
HF-SUSG02-029/11/891.00
HF-SUSG03-029/11/891.00
5.00 U/BJ 5.00 U/BJ
10.00 R/U 10.00 R/U
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
APPENDIX A3HAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Semi-Volatiles MATRIX: Surface Water
Page 1
UNITS: ug/l
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
Phenolbis(2-Chloroethyl)ether2-Chlorophenol1.3-DJchlorobenzene1.4-DichlorobenzeneBenzyl alcohol1,2-D i chIorobenzene2-Methylphenolbis(2-ChloroisopropyOether4-MethylphenolN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamineHexachIoroethaneNitrobenzene1sophorone2-Kitrophenol2,4-DimethylphenolBenzoic acidbis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane2,4-Dichlorophenot1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachIorobut adi ene4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-MethylnaphthaIeneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenot2-Chloronaphthalene2-MitroaniIineDimethylphthalateAcenaphthylene2,6-Dinitrototuene3-NitroanilJneAcenaphthene2,4-Dinitrophenol4-NitrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneOiethylphthalate4-Chlorophenyl-phenyletherFluorene4-NitroaniIine4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenolN-Nitrosodiphenylamine< 1)4-Bromophenyl-phonyletherHexachlorobenionePentachlorophenolPhenanthrenc
CRQL
10101010101010101010101010101010501010101010101010101050105010105010505010101010101050501010105010
HF-SUSG02-029/11/891.12
HF-SWSG03-029/11/89
1.10
APPENDIX A3 Page 2HAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Semi-VotatHes MATRIX: Surface Uater UNITS: ug/l
SAMPLE 10: HF-SWSG02-02 HF-SUSG03-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/11/89 9/11/89CRQL FACTOR: 1.12____________1.10_______
COMPOUNDS CRQL
Anthracene 10Dt-n-butylphthatate 10Fluoranthene 10Pyrene 10Butylbenzylphthai ate 103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 20Benzo(a)anthracene 10Chrysene 10bis(2-Ethythexyt)phthalate 10 11.00 U/BJ 11.00 U/BJDi-n-octylphthai ate 10Benzo(b)fluoranthene 10Benzo(k)fluoranthene 10Benzo(a)pyrene 10Indenod, 2,3-cd)pyrene 10Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 10Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 10
<1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC. 8-Nov-1989SUMMARY OF TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Page 1
BY SAMPLE ID
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: Hagen Farms - Round 2MATRIX: Surface Water
SAMPLE ANAL.ID TYPE COMPOUND CONC. UNITS DVQ LQ
HF-SWSG03-02TBNA Cyclodecane 9.500 ug/1 J
Appendix A4
Leachate Sampling Results
APPENDIX A4 Pa9eHAGEN FARMS RI/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: GU Indicators MATRIX: Leachate
SAMPLE ID: . HF-LPLH01-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/08/89
COMPOUNDS UNIT
Alkalinity mg/t 330.00 V/Chloride mg/t 7.80 V/Sulfate mg/l 5.00 V/U
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER D E F I N I T I O N S .
APPENDIX A4 Page 1HAGEH FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Metals MATRIX: Leachate
SAMPLE 10: HF-LPIH01-02SAMPLE DATE: 9/06/89
COMPOUNDS UHTT
Barium ug/l 527.00 V/Lead ug/l 458.00 V/Mercury ug/l 0.20 V/
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
SAHPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneHethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-DichloroethaneTotal 1,2-DichtoroetheneChloroform1.2-Dichloroethane2-Butanooe1,1,1-Tr i chloroethaneCarbon TetrachlortdeVinyl AcetateBromodi ch I oronethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene0ibromochIoromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneBromoforffl4-Hethyl-2-Pentanone2-KexanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneTotal XylenesTetrahydrofuran
CRQL
10101010510555555105510555555555101055555555
APPENDIX A4HAGEN FARMS Rl/FS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Leachate
Page 1
UNITS: ug/l
HF-LPLH01-029/08/89170.00
840.00 U/BJ
1700.00 R/U
210.00 /J
2700.00
14000.0023000.00
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.(2) REFER TO TABLE FOR QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS.
Appendix B
Meteorological Data
Appendix B
Summary of Meteorological Data
Local meteorological data was collected at the Hagen Farm site with the CR10Measurement and Control Module from Campbell Scientific, Inc. of Logan, Utah.The CR10 is a standalone, battery powered, micro-processor based data loggercapable of recording and storing nearly 30,000 data values collected from avariety of sensors through both analog and digital input ports.
The data logger at the Hagen Farm site contained sensors to measure airtemperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, wind speed and wind direction,and a tipping bucket rain gage to measure precipitation. During cold weatherperiods thermostatically controlled heaters within the rain gage allowedaccumulated snowfall to melt, and the resulting water-equivalent to berecorded.
The data logger operated from September 9, 1988 to July 31, 1989. Data fromthe sensors was summarized hourly and stored in the CRIO's random access memory(RAM), from which daily summary data was calculated, at midnight, and stored inRAM as well. The hourly and daily summaries were periodically downloaded fromthe data logger for analysis and storage.
The data collected by the data logger is summarized in the following pages.
Air Temperature
The graphs on the following page summarize the air temperature data collectedat the Hagen Farm site.
The series of graphs on the top of the page are centile plots showing the rangeand distribution of the daily minimum and maximum temperatures and thetemperature recorded at the end of each day. These plots can be used todetermine what proportion of the data collected falls above or below any giventemperature.
The graph at the bottom of the page shows the same data, against time, for theduration of the data collection period. The verticle bars show, for each day,the minimum and maximum temperatures. The dash on each bar indicates thetemperature at the end of the day. The position of the dash, relative to theextremes for the day, can be helpful in spotting warming and cooling trendsthat are not evident when viewing the extremes only.
Temperature ranges for the data shown:
Daily minimum:Daily maximum:End of day:
-22.3 to 21.3 degrees C (-8.1 to 70.3 degrees F)-17.4 to 37.5 degrees C (0.7 to 99.5 degrees F)-20.9 to 27.3 degrees C (-5.6 to 81.1 degrees F)
Air Temperature (c)i i
W -4 | -k Nj W
O
03o
0>o
J2. -O NO OF*Ofi)*< -»-^ to^ oII
5? o0000
K>*>.O
Ooo
0)uo
Proportion of Data
g B S 2 8
g B £ S 8
1.6
0> 1.4
c 1.2
1.0
CO
o u.o£QL 0.415* 0.2
0.0
Daily Precipitation (Rainfall or Water Equivalent of Snowfall)Hagen Farm: 9/88-7/89
3O 60 9O 120 150 180 21O 240 27O 3OO 33OProject Day (1 = 9/9/88)
The graph above shows total daily precipitation - either rainfall or the water-equivalent ofsnowfall - for the duration of the data collection period.
Measurable precipitation occurred on 94 out of 326 days of data collection. On those days, thetotal precipitation ranged from 0.01" to 1.53", with an average total of 0.23".
Wind Rose: Hagen Farm, 9/88 - 7/89
PercentOccurrence
LEGENDWind Speed (mph)
0- 4.95.0- 9.9
10.0-14.915.0-19.920.0-24.9
Wind speed and direction data collected at the Hagen Farm site is summarizedabove with a "wind rose" plot. It consists of eight bars, one for each of theeight major compass points. Each bar contains segments of differing widthsrepresenting 5-mph wind speed categories (0-5, 5-10, etc.). The length of asegment indicates the frequency of occurrence of that wind speed category forthe given compass direction.
Wind speed and direction were sensed by the data logger every ten seconds andplaced in temporary storage. Every hour, all values in temporary storage wereaveraged and placed in final storage. This hourly data was used to create thewind rose as follows: all hourly wind speeds were assigned to one of the 5-mphwind speed categories; all hourly wind directions were assigned to one of theeight wind direction categories; the frequency of occurrence for each windspeed category within each wind direction category was then computed. Forhours when there was no wind - thus no wind direction - the data has beendistributed among the eight wind direction categories according to theirrelative frequency of occurrence.
The plot indicates that the predominant winds at the site were from thesouthwest and west. The bar for the southwest winds shows that 15 percent ofthe wind measurements at the site were from the southwest at speeds of betweenzero and five miles per hour, that approximately five percent were from thesouthwest at speeds of between five and ten miles per hour, that approximatelytwo percent were from that direction at speeds of 10 to 15 miles per hour, andso on.
Note: due to equipment failure, some wind data in late December 1988 and inJanuary 1989 is invalid and was excluded from the wind rose.
cooao
Frequency Distributions for Other Daily ReadingsHagen Farm: 9/88-7/89Average Air Temperature Average Relative Humidity
1.O i ——— i ——— i ——— r ——— i ——— r ——— r^- — i ——— i 1.O
« a..COO
o*
0.4
0.2
OJ)i y
04
o.e
0,4
OJE -
O.O
Peak Solar Radiation—T————I————1————I————|————|———3
i:
-24 -!• -• 0 • 10 24 22 4O ao 40 eo%
so too 0.0 01 04 a* a* 1.0 1.2 1.4kw/m2
The graphs above are centile plots showing the range and distribution of the dally average airtemperature, the daily average relative humidity, and the peak solar radiation recorded.
The graph of the average air temperature is very similar to the graphs for air temperaturespresented previously. It is presented here for completeness. The daily average air temperatureranged from -19.4 to 29.4 degrees C (-2.9 to 84.9 degrees F).
The graph for average relative humidity indicates that the daily average at Hagen Farm exceeded60 percent nearly 80 percent of the time. The daily average relative humidity ranged from 16.6 to93.7 percent.
Solar radiation is an indicator of the amount of sky cover. It is lowest when the sky is overcast,but is still present. After sundown and before dawn, solar radiation registers as zero. The datalogger at Hagen Farm sampled the solar radiation sensor every 10 seconds, and recorded the valueread at the hour. The graph above shows the distribution of the absolute maximum solar radiationvalue recorded each day between 2/14/89 and 7/31/89.
Appendix C
Water Levels
Appendix CGroundwater Elevations
Hagen Far* RI/FS
WellNo.
MU-1MW-4P-6AP-6BMW-7P-7BP-8AP-8BMW-9MW-12P-12BHW-13MW-14P-14BMW-15MW-16HW-17P-17AMW-13HW-19MW-20HW-21MW-22MW-23MW-24LH-1SCW-1SCW-2SCW-3SCW-4SCW-58401840284038404840584068407840884098410841184128413QW-1QW-2QW-3QW-4QW-5QW-6HAGENSTG-1STG-2STG-3STG-3R
Top OfCasingElevation893.82 **876.88 **882.16882.57877.36877.78871.08870.93 **877.84882.21882.07874.25883.40883.13903.30884.01865.77865.73862.89861.95888.26879.51878.31887.46874.97879.33878.88882.78875.93879.58879.64885.34 *893.55887.27 *890.59 *864.14866.01 *865.34 *867.14 *871.08 *866.90 *.-__883.46 *897.10 *888.15--863.95 *879.61871.60873.92863.65859.58857.65857.59
DepthToWater
(9-14-88)32.4117.7521.9924.3719.8719.9714.1613.8219.1922.7824.0515.1722.7224.9043.3524.899.569.546.585.4727.8020.12__..---,----__..-_25.68__27.4331.10--9.78..10.2113.889.54__DRY._--28.68--..21.6714.4517.12------
GroundwaterElevation(9-14-88)
861.41859.13860.17858.20857.49857.81856.92857.11858.65859.43858.02859.08860.68858.23859.95859.12856.21856.19856.31856.48860.46859.39--.-.-—....——__DRY--859.84859.49--856.23_.856.93857.20857.36_-,.__--859.47—--857.94857.15856.80....__
DepthToWater
(10-21-88)„17.8822.5624.5219.9620.0814.1813.8619.4023.1824.2815.3523.2325.1343.9425,449.509.516.454.5828.3620.40--28.3617.829.60--—--—..26.17_.27.8431.60..9.688.9510.0713.759.11..DRY23.6637.4629.18--7.5521.8614.4217.14--..--
GroundwaterElevation(10-21-88)—
859.00859.60858.05857.40857.70856.90857.07858.44859.03857.79858.90860.17858.00859.36858.57856.27856.22856.44857.37859.90859.11-»859.10857.15869.73---,-..--—859.17—859.43858.99—856.33856.39857.07857.33857.79-,-_859.80859.64858.97—856.40857.75857.18856.78..-,-_
DepthToWater
(12-8-88)33.1817.6722.9924.6619.6420.0213.7913.6220.7723.6724.4315.3223.6525.2444.3525.819.159.166.113.1028.7620.4221.1128.8117.518.4020.0023.6518.1621.3419.7726.61--28.4332.07--9.358.529.7813.468.79.._.24.0437.8529.64--7.2021.6014.1416.924.192.382.08
GroundwaterElevation(12-8-88)860.64859.21859.17857.91857.72857.76857.29857.31857.07858.54857.64858.93859.75857.89858.95858.20856.62856.57856.78858.85859.50859.09857.20858.65857.46870.93858.88859.13857.77858.24859.87858.73--858.84858.52__856.66856.82857.36857.62858.11--._859.42859.25858.51-_856.75858.01857.46857.00859.46857.20855.57
PJ/skb/TJD[ndj-401-24e]13452.60
Appendix CGroundwater Elevations
Hagen Far* RI/FS
Page 2 of 3
WellNo.
MW-1MW-4P-6AP-6BMW-7P-7BP-8AP-8BMW-9MW-12P-12BMW-13MW-14P-14BMW-1 5MW-16MU-17P-17AMW-18MW-19MW-20MW-21MW-22MW-23MW-24LH-1SCW-1SCW-2SCW-3SCW-4SCW-58401840284038404840584068407840884098410841184128413QW-1QW-2QW-3QW-4QW-5QW-6HAGENSTG-1STG-2STG-3STG-3R
Top OfCasingElevation893.82 **876.88 **882.16882.57877.36877.78871.08870.93 **877.84882.21882.07874.25883.40883.13903.30884.01865.77865.73862.89861.95888.26879.51878.31887.46874.97879.33878.88882.78875.93879.58879.64885.34 *893.55887.27 *890.59 *864.14866.01 *865.34 *867.14 *871.08 *866.90 *...-883.46 *897.10 *888.15--863.95 *879.61871.60873.92863.65859.58857.65857.59
DepthTo
Water(2-14-89)33.3416.4123.0024.6919.7820.1513.9713.8519.8623.7324.4915.5323.7125.3444.4425.949.369.346.332.00 ice28.8120.5821.3228.8817.667.8921.2823.9318.4021.5519.4826.6834.6028.5232.12..9.528.659.9413.628.98.---24.1237.9029.71..7.3621.7214.2717.094.04 ice1.70 ice--
GroundwaterElevation(2-14-89)860.48860.47859.16857.88857.58857.63857.11857.08857.98858.48857.58858.72859.69857.79858.86858.07856.41856.39856.56859.95859.45858.93856.99858.58857.31871.44857.60858.85857.53858.03860.16858.66858.95858.75858.47..856.49856.69857.20857.46857.92.._.859.34859.20858.44..856.59857.89857.33856.83859.61857.88,.
DepthToWater
-(3-21-89)33.0413.6322.9824.4419.3219.7713.5413.4219.7223.6324.1915.1823.6925.0744.4025.908.658.905.892.40 ice28.8220.3620.7728.7917.056.4220.2423.9317.3021.3919.4426.6134.5628.5632.00.-8.688.14..13.308.56--__24.1337.8929.60..6.9021.2613.8516.69__....
GroundwaterElevation(3-21-89)
860.78863.25859.18858.13858.04858.01857.54857.51858.12858.58857.88859.07859.71858.06858.90858.11857.12856.83857.00859.55859.44859.15857.54858.67857.92872.91858.64858.85858.63858.19860.20858.73858.99858.71858.59__857.33857.20.-857.78858.34.___859.33859.21858.55..857.05858.35857.75857.23._.___
DepthToWater
(4-17-89133.1713.8722.6424.4419.4019.8413.5813.4819.5523.4324.1815.2023.4225.1244.1625.688.968.965.902.9228.5220.2820.9128.6117.226.9919.9023.4517.7521.0418.5826.3534.2828.3531.86__9.118.2713.238.47____23.8337.6129.42_„7.0021.2713.8716.744.221.70destroyed
GroundwaterElevation(4-17-89)
860.65863.01859.52858.13857.96857.94857.50857.45858.29858.78857.89859.05859.98858.01859.14858,33856.81856.77856.99859.03859.74859.23857.40858.85857.75872.34858.98859.33858.18858.54861.06858.99859.27858.92858.73856.90857.07857.85858.43__859.63859.49858.73
856.95858.34857.73857.18859.43859.58
PJ/ndj/TJD[ndj-4qi-24f3Ic "L3452.60
Appendix CGroundwater Elevations
Hagen Far* RI/FS
Page 3 of 3
WellNo.
MW-1MU-4P-6AP-6BMW-7P-7BP-8AP-8BMU-9MW-12P-12BHW-13MW-14P-14BMW-1 5MW-16MW-1 7P-17AMW-18MU-19MW-20MW-21HU-22MW-23HW-24LH-1SCW-1SCW-2SCW-3SCW-4SCW-58401840284038404840584068407840884098410841184128413QW-1QW-2QW-3QW-4QW-5QW-6HAGENSTG-1STG-2STG-3STG-3R
Top OfCasingElevation893,82 **876.88 **882.16882.57877.36877.78871.08870.93 **877.84882.21882.07874.25883.40883.13903.30884.01865.77865.73862.89861.95888.26879.51878.31887.46874.97879.33878.88882.78875.93879.58879.64885.34 *893.55887.27 *890.59 *864.14866.01 *865.34 *867.14 *871.08 *866.90 *--—883.46 *897.10 *888.15--863.95 *879.61871.60873.92863.65859.58857.65857.59
DepthTo
Water(5-18-89)33.5716.4422.8724.8019.8420.2514.0213.8719.6423.5824.4615.6323.8025.4944.4625.939.359.386.354.2528.8820.5821.3228.8417.687.6120.0523.6718.3421.3219.0126.6234.5628.5032.05__9.518.67--13.688.88..__24.1637.9129.62—7.4221.7714.3317.104.972.20..2.04
GroundwaterElevation(5-18-89)
860.25860.44859.29857.77857.52857.53857.06857.06858.20858.63857.61858.62859.60857.64858.84858.08856.42856.35856.54857.70859.38858.93856.99858.62857.29871.72858.83859.11857.59858.26860.63858.72858.99858.77858.54__856.50856.67—857.40858.02.._-859.30859.19858.53--856.53857.84857.27856.82858.68857.38-.855.55
DepthToWater
(6-19-89)33.9018.3123.1725.2320.3720.7514.5614.4120.1223.9324.9016.1124.0825.9044.6826.219.939.936.945.1229.1620.9421.8529.1218.238.4020.5324.1418.9421.8019.5426.9234.8429.8832.25.,..9.31—14.279.54.„—24.4938.1729.93..-,22.2814.87-.DRY2.83..2.52
GroundwaterElevation(6-19-89)
859.92858.57858.99857.34856.99857.03856.52856.52857.72858.28857.17858.14859.32857.23858.62857.80855.84855.80855.95856.83859.10858.57856.46858.34856.74870.93858.35858.64856.99857.78860.10858.42858.71856.39858.34____856.03--856.81857.36__.-858.97858.93858.22-.--857.33856.73._..856.75__855.07
DepthTo
Water(7-24-89)34.3718.9823.6625.6820.9121.2015.0314.8120.5324.3425.3116.6024.5926.3545.2226.6610.2510.277.285.6229.6721.4822.3429.6118.748.6621.0424.6219.5422.3220.2327.3135.3429.2932.80__10.449.6410.98DRY10.11„_-_24.9538.6730.40
8.34
15.35..DRY2.68
DRY
GroundwaterElevation(7-24-89)859.45857.90858.50856.89856.45856.58856.05856.12857.31857.87856.76857.65858.81856.78858.08857.35855.52855.46855.61856.33858.59858.03855.97857.85856,23870.67857.84858.16856.39857.26859.41858.03858.21857.98857.79__855.57855.70856.16871.08856.79__.-858.51858.43857.75__855.61856.25863.65856.90.-
* TOP OF WELL CAP SURVEYED. CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED BASED ON THICKNESS OF WELL CAP.
** TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF WELL PIPE EXCEPT WELLS MW-1, MW-4, AND P-8B WHICH ARE TOPOF PROTECTIVE CASING.
0.75 CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED TO MONITORING WELLS INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE RI/FS BASED ONCOMPARISON OF ELEVATIONS OBTAINED BY KAPUR VERSUS THOSE OBTAINED BY WMWI AT WELLS MW9 ANDMW12. (ELEVATIONS LISTED FOR MW9 AND MW12 ARE THOSE OF KAPUR)
ELEVATION OF STAFF GAUGES (STG) 2 AND 3 IS TOP OF SCALE (ZERO).
ELEVATION OF STAFF GAUGE 1 IS TOP OF PIPE
PJ/ndj/TJD[ndj-401-24g]13452.60
Appendix CGroundwater Elevations
Hagen Far* RI/FS
wellNo.
MW-1HW-4P-6AP-6BHW-7P-7BP-8AP-88HU-9MW-12P-12BHW-13MW-14P-14BMU-15MW-16MW-1 7P-17BP-17CMW-1 8MW-19MW-20MW-21MW-22P-22BMW-23MW-24MW-25P-25BMU-26P-26BMW-27P-27BMW-28P-28BMW-29P-29BMW-30P-30BMW-31LH-1SCW-1SCW-2SCW-3SCW-4SCW-5840184028403840484058406
840784088409
Top ofCasingElevation893.82 **876.88 **882.16882.57877.36877.65871.08870.93 **877.84882.21881.79874.25883.40883.13903.30884.01865.77865.35865.31862.79862.21888.26879.51878.31878.55887.46874.97862.41862.77883.87883.29872.27872.02864.76863.84878.23878.43869.26867.96907.68879.33878.88882.78875.93879.58879.64885.34 *893.55887.27 *890.59 *864.14866.01 *865.34 *867.14 *871.08 *
DepthtoWater(8-29-89)34.7019.1024.0126.0621.2821.43 (2)15.4515.2321.7324.6825.40 (2)16.9824.8726.6745.5126.9710.7210.33 (2)10.36 (2)7.746.0129.9621.7522.7822.4622.9219.146.947.3327.3227.10 (2)17.5717.3010.499.5824.3424.6114.3013.11 (2)49.038.8621.1024.8719.9422.5020.3527.6635.6529.6233.1011.9010.0511.36DRY
GroundwaterElevation(8-29-89)859.12857.78858.15856.51856.08856.22855.63855.70856.11857.53856.39857.27858.53856.46857.79857.04855.05855.02854.95855.05856.20858.30857.76855.53856.09864.54855.83855.47855.44856.55856.19854.70854.72854.27854.26853.89853.82854.96854.85858.65870.47857.78857.91855.99857.08859.29857.68857.90857.65857.49..854.11855.29855.78.-
Depthto
Water(9-26-89)
34.9519.4424.2826.2821.4421.6415.5815.4021.2025.0125.7117.1525.1026.9045.7627.2010.8810.5510.517.895.8830.1921.9922.9122.5530.1819.336.967.4727.6827.3517.7317.4610.659.7324.4924.7714.4813.3049.299.1421.5725.2320.1022.8520.8027.9235.8829.8833.43..11.06
10.2111.52
ORY
GroundwaterElevation(9-26-89)858.87857.44857.88856.29855.92856.01855.50855.53856.64857.20856.08857.10858.30856.23857.54856.81854.89854.80854.80854.90856.33858.07857.52855.40856.00857.28855.64855.45855.30856.19855.94854.54854.56854.11854.11853.74853.66854.78854.66858.39870.19857.31857.55855.83856.73858.84857.42857.67857.39857.16..854.95855.13855.62..
Depthto
Water(10-23-89)
35.2319.7824.4926.4922.3921.8115.8415.6122.2425.1825.9417.4225.3727.0945.9827.4411.1110.7610.738.116.1630.4422.2223.1822.8230.3919.567.247.6827.8227.5417.9717.7110.869.9424.7224.9714.7413.5249.539.3621.7625.4520.4023.0621.0628.1436.1430.0933.61..11.3010.4511.76
DRY
GroundwaterElevation(10-23-89)
858.59857.10857.67856.08854.97855.84855.24855.32855.60857.03855.85856.83858.03856.04857.32856.57854.66854.59854.58854.68856.05857.82857.29855.13855.73857.07855.41855.17855.09856.05855.75854.30854.31853.90853.90853.51853.46854.52854.44858.15869.97857.12857.33855.53856.52858.58857.20857.41857.18856.98__854.71
854.89855.38
Appendix CGroundwater Elevations
Hagen Fam RI/FS
Page 2 of 2
WellNo.8410841184128413QW-1QW-2QW-3QW-4QW-5QW-6HAGENSTfi-1STG-2STG-3R
Top ofCasingElevation866.90 *.-.-883.46 *897.10 *888.15--863.95 *879.61871.60873.92863.65859.58857.59
DepthtoHater(8-29-89)CAP STUCK----25.2438.9730.71—--23.2215.75..DRYDRYDRY (1)
GroundwaterElevation(8-29-89)
858.23858.13857.44
856.39855.8S
854.56
Depthto
Water(9-26-89)
CAP STUCK
25.4539.2031.01
23.3715.89
DRYDRYDRY
GroundwaterElevation(9-26-89)
858.01857.90857.14
856.24855.71
DepthtoWater
(10-23-89)10.78
25.7439.4531.199.1623.6516.14
DRYDRYDRY
GroundwaterElevation(10-23-89)
856.12
857.72857.65856.96
854.79855.96855.46
863.65859.58857.59
* - TOP OF WELL CAP SURVEYED. CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED BASED ON THICKNESS OF WELL CAP.** - TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF WELL PIPE EXCEPT WELLS MW-1, MW-4, AND P-8B WHICH ARE
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING.
ELEVATIONS OF WELLS P7B, P12B, P17B, HW18, AND MW19 ARE MODIFIED FROM PREVIOUSLY REPORTEDVALUES, BASED ON SURVEY PERFORMED SEPT. 6 & 7, 1989.
0.75 CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED TO MONITORING INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE RI/FS WELLS BASED ONCOMPARISON OF ELEVATIONS OBTAINED BY KAPUR VERSUS THOSE OBTAINED BY WMWI AT WELLS MW9 AND MW12.(ELEVATIONS LISTED FOR MW9 AND HW12 ARE THOSE OF KAPUR)
ELEVATION OF STAFF GAUGES (STG) 2 AND 3 IS TOP OF SCALE (ZERO). ELEVATION OF STG-1 IS TOP OFPIPE. STG-3 WAS DAMAGED BY ICE AND REPLACED BY STG-3R.
(1) STAFF GAUGE WAS DRY. WATER ELEVATION MEASURED DURING 9-7-89 SURVEY.
(2) WELL CASING WAS MODIFIED TO INSTALL SAMPLING PUMPS ON 9-5-89. CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED TOWATER DEPTH MEASURED PRIOR TO MODIFICATION BASED ON SURVEY DATA OR LENGTH OF CASING REMOVED(PREVIOUSLY UNSURVEYED WELLS)
PFJ/dlk/SWR101.60
ndj-401-24A]3452.f
Appendix D
Hydraulic Conductivity Tests
BAILDOWN HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITYTEST METHODS AND RESULTS
The purpose of the balldown tests conducted on the site 1s to measure 1n-s1tusaturated hydraulic conductivity of subsurface materials. BaHdown testsmeasure the saturated hydraulic conductivity of undisturbed, 1n-place aquifermaterial, whereas laboratory tests require removal of a sample from Itsnatural environment.
The general procedure for a ball down test 1s to Instantaneously remove ameasured volume of water from the well as rapidly as possible, by balling orpumping, and measure the rate at which the water 1n the well returns to Itsstatic level. The hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer material 1s afunction of the rate of water level rise and the well geometry. In permeableaquifer material, the location of the well screen with respect to the watertable and the base of the aquifer are Important.
DATA REDUCTIONSeveral methods are available to Interpret the water level versus time datathat are obtained from a balldown test. These Include Hvorslev (1951), NAVFAC(1971), Papadopulos, et al. (1973), and Bouwer and R1ce (1976). The firstthree referenced use an analytical solution to a well fully penetrating aconfined aquifer. The method by Bouwer and R1ce utilizes an analog model ofboth fully and partially penetrating wells to aid 1n solution of the modifiedThlem equation. The Bouwer and R1ce method was selected because of Usability to Incorporate the effects on recovery rate due to a partiallypenetrating well.
The Bouwer and R1ce method Is based on solution of a modified Thlem equationfor radial flow to a pumped well as shown 1n Equation 1.
-2-
Q-2 (KLy)/(ln(Re/rw)) ................................. (1)Where :
Q - flow Into the well (L3/T)K * hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer (L/T)L * open length of open Interval 1n the well (L)y » difference between the water level 1n the well and the
equilibrium level 1n the aquifer (L)Re = radius of Influence of the well (L)Rw * effective well radius (L)
In a single well test, the value of Re 1s unknown. Values of Re, In terms ofthe ln(Re/rw) were determined by Bouwer and R1ce (1976) with an electricanalog model of a homogeneous 1sotrop1c aquifer. The analog model was used toanalyze the effects of the aquifer and well geometry. Results of the studyfor a partially penetrating well 1s shown 1n Equation 2 using Equation 3 todetermine the value of ln(Re/rw).
K = rc2ln(Re/rw) 1 In fy01............................... (2)2L
Where:
fy01lyj
rc = radius of the well casing (L)t - time (T)
y0.yt « difference between the water level 1n the well and theequilibrium level In the aquifer at times o and t
ln(Re/rw)- [l.l/ln(Hrw) + A+B ln(D-H)/rw)] -1 .............. (3)
Where:
ArB - constants obtained from Figure BH - depth to the bottom of the screen from the water tableD = thickness of the aquifer
As noted by Bouwer and R1cer a semllog plot of y0/yt versus time (t) (on thelinear scale) should yield a straight Hne.
-3-
A FORTRAN program was developed by WEI to reduce the balldown field test data.The program allows for skewed data points and outliers to be deleted from thetime-drawdown plot, and the remaining data points are then matched to a linearleast square fit.
REFERENCES CITED
Bouwer, H. and R1ce, R.C., 1976, A Slug Test for Determining HydraulicConductivity of Unconflned Aquifers with Completely or PartiallyPenetrating Wells. Water Resources Research, Vol. 12, No. 3r p. 423-428.
Hvorslev, M.J.f 1951r Time Lag and Soil Permeability 1n GroundwaterObservations. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Exp. Sta. Bull 36,Vlcksburg, MS.
Papadopulos, S.S., Bredehoeft, J.D., and Cooper, H.H., Jr., 1973, On theAnalysis of 'Slug Test1 Data. Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, No. 4.,p. 1087-1089.
United States Department of the Navy, Design Manual: Soil Mechanics,Foundations, Earth Structures, NAVFAK DM-F, March 1971, p. 7-4-9.
MO/jlv[Jlv-600-89a]
3E1000BEnvironmental Logger
10/25 09:33
Units 00168 Teot« 1
INPUT 1: Level (F) TOG
ReferenceScale factorOffset
Steptf 0 10/24
Elapsed Time
0.00000.00330.00660 . 00990.01330.01660.02000.02330.02660.03000.03330.05000.06660.03330.10000.11660.13330.15000.16660.18330.20000.21660.23330.25000.26660.28330.30000.31660.33330.41670.50000.58330.66670.75000.83330.91671.00001.08331.16671.25001.33331.41661.50001.58331.66671.75001.83331.91672.00002.50003.00003.50004.00004.50005.00005.50006 . 00006.50007.00007.50008.00008.50009.00009.5000
10.000012.0000
2ND
10.8619.860.00
11:42
Value
10.8610.8711.0811.5711.2611.3111.7211.5911.5111.4311.3611.1411.0210.9610.9210.9010.8910.8810.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8710.8610.8610.3610.8610.8610. So10.8610.3610.3610.8610.8610.8610.8610.8710.8710.86
RRM DfiTR HMD .SQURnt
'••'•-I
H.O 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0
TIME (SEC
W A f l Z Y N E N G I N E E R I N G . I N C .
M A D I S O N . W I S C O N S I N .
B A I L D O W N A N A L Y S I S
DATA OBTAINED BY : PFJ
DATA ANALYZED BY : PFJ
BAIL DOWN PARAMETERS FOR B: MW28.DAT
EFFECTIVE WELL DIAMETER =
EFFECTIVE SCREEN DIAMETER =
SCREEN LENGTH =
WELL PENETRATION DEPTH =
AQUIFER THICKNESS s
STATIC WATER LEVEL =
AQUIFER CONDUCTIVITY IS =
OR
AQUIFER TRANSMI3SIVITY IS =
OR
2 . 0 0 0 INCHES
2 . 0 0 0 INCHES
6 . 6 0 0 FEET
6 . 6 U O FEET
4 0 . 0 0 0 FEET
10.860 FEET
• 2 0 2 E - U 1 CM/SEC
. 4 2 7 E + Q 4 G A L / F T / F T / D A Y
246E + C2 CM'CM/ ' . -EC
17LE + C5 G A L / F T / D A Y
CENSl . iRED DATA END POINTS AhESTART TIME IS =
END T I M E 13 -
Unit* 00168 TeatH 7
INPUT 1: Leval (F) TOC
ReferenceScale factorOffset
Step* 0 10/24
Elapsed Time
0.00000.00330.00660.00990.01330.01660.02000.02330.02660.03000.03330.05000.06660.08330.10000.11660.13330.15000.16660.18330.20000.21660.23330.25000.26660.28330.30000.31660.33330.41670.50000.58330.66670.75000.83330.91671.00001.08331.16671.25001.33331.41661.50001.58331.66671.75001.83331.91672.00002.50003.00003.50004.00004.50005.00005.50006.00006.50007,00007,50003.00003,50009.00009,5000
10.0000END
7.2519.360.00
16:43
Value
7.217.217.217.217.928.657.287.148.768.367.668.037.687.657,587,567.547,537.517.517,507.507.497.497.487.487.487.487.487.467.457.457.447.437.437.437.427.417.417.417.417.407.407.407.407.397.387.387.367.M7.357.357.347.337.327.317.317.307.307.307.307.297.297.237.28
flTR HMD LST.SQUflRE FITr—
j
-f 1^~z T
-t-
0.0 10.0 0.0 140.0 0.0 60.0
T I M E (3ECS) *10'
@<a'3'S!«S'<a@«@@<a
W A R Z Y N E N G I N E E R I N G . I M C .
M A D I S O N . W I S C O N S I N .
B A I L D O W N A N A L Y S I S
DATA OBTAINED BY : . PFJ
DATA ANALYZED BY : PFJ
BAIL DOWN PARAMETERS FOR A:MW25.DAT
EFFECTIVE WELL DIAMETER
EFFECTIVE SCREEN DIAMETER =
SCREEN LENGTH =
WELL PENETRATION DEPTH =
AQUIFER THICKNESS =
STATIC WATER LEVEL =
AQUIFER CONDUCTIVITY IS =
OR
AQUIFER TRANSMIS3IVITY IS -
OR
8.500 INCHES
4.900 INCHES
6.200 FEET
S.200 FEET
7.500 FEET
7.250 FEET
.633E-03 CM/SEC
.'L34E+03 GAL- FT/FT/DHY
. 145E+00 CMtCM/SEC
-101E+03 GAL/FT/DAY
3B88B88flfl88tlBS88S8B8888B8B888BBS8fl8B88S3a3B8BB8
CENSORED DATA END POINTS ARESTART TIME IS =
Unit* 00168 Teat8 5
INPUT 1: Level (?) TOC
ReferenceScale factorOffset
27.8219.860.00
StepB 0 10/24 15:19
Elapsed Tijne Value
0.00000.00330.00660.00990.01330.01660.02000.02330.02660.03000.03330.05000.06660.08330.10000.11660.13330.15000.16660.18330.20000.21660.23330.25000.26660.28330.30000.31660.33330.41670.50000.58330.66670.75000.83330.91671.00001.08331.16671.25001,33331,41661.50001.58331.66671,75001.83331.91672.00002.50003.00003.50004.00004.50005.00005.50006.00006.50007.00007.50003.00003.50009.00009.5000
10.0000END
28.0328.1329.2427.5129.1028.6923.7028.6828.6628.6428.6228.5528.4828.4328.3828.3528.3128.2828.2628.2328.2228.2128.2028.1928.1828.1828.1728.1728.1728.1528.1328.1328.1228.1228.1128.1128.1128.1028.1028.1028.1028.1028.1028.0928.0928.0928.0828. 0628.0828.0728.0728.0728.0?28.0628.0528.0528.0428.0428.0528.0428.0428.0328.0328.0328.03
Q
4- +
i.O 10.0 cIU . 0 ::0.0
T I M E ISECS) *10
1—————————I—— ~——14U.0 50.0 EC
1
W A R Z Y N E N G I N E E R I N G , I N C .
M A D I S O N . W I S C O N S I N .
B A I L D O W N A N A L Y S I S
DATA OBTAINED BY : PFJ
DATA ANALYZED BY : PFJ
BAIL DOWN PARAMETERS FOR A : M W 2 6 . D A T
EFFECTIVE WELL DIAMETER
EFFECTIVE SCREEN DIAMETER =
SCREEN LENGTH =
WELL PENETRATION DEPTH
AQUIFER THICKNESS
STATIC WATER LEVEL
AQUIFER CONDUCTIVITY IS =
OR
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY IS =
OR
9. 500 INCHES
4.900 INCHES
7.000 FEET
7.000 FEET
25.000 FEET
27.320 FEET
.S14E-04 CM/SEC
.172E+02 GAL/FT/FT/DAY
.320E-01 CM*CM/SEC
.431E*02 GAL/FT 'DAY
3f l8»a i l» J tBf l»BBBI t»BB»j tBBB8«3«[ l33 f lBB8B38B«t t8BBi i J t3 f l
CENSORED DATA END POINTS ARE :START TIME IS
END TIME IS
Environmental Logger10/25 09:2fl
Unit* 00168 Testa 6
INPUT 1: Level (F) TOG
ReferenceScale factorOffset
Step* 0 10/24
E lapsed Tine
0.00000.00330.00660.00990.01330.01660.02000.02330.02660.03000.03330.05000.06660.08330.10000.11660.13330.15000.16660.18330.20000.21660.23330.25000.26660.28330.30000.31660.33330.41670.50000.58330.66670.75000.83330.91671.00001.08331.16671.25001.33331.41661.50001.58331.66671.75001.83331.91672.00002.50003.00003.50004.00004.50005.00005.50006.00006.50007.00007.50008.00008.50003.00003.5000
10.000012.000014.000016.0000
END
27.8219.860.00
15:46
Value
28.0029.6228.4028.5228.7529.1129.0829.0529.0329.0028.9828.8828.7828.7028.6228.5628.5028.4628.4228.3628.3528.3328.3128.2926.2828.2728.2628.2528.2428.2228.2028.1928.1828.1728.1728.1628.1528.1528.1528.1428.1328.1328.1328.1328.1328.1328.1228.1226.1228. U28.1028.1028.0928.0628.0628.0728.0728.0628.0628.0628.0528.0528.0528.0528.0428.0328.0328.02
FiPN [JHTH FIND LST.SQUfiRE FIT
MH-26 DLIPL
o.o 20.0 ito.o 60. o ao.o ICO. 150.1)
TIME (5ECSJ *10
W A R Z Y N E N G I N E E R I N G . I N C .
M A D I S O N . W I S C O N S I N .
B A I L D O W N A N A L Y S I S
DATA OBTAINED BY : PFJ
DATA ANALYZED BY : PFJ
BAIL DOWN PARAMETERS FOR B; MW26DUP. DAT
EFFECTIVE WELL DIAMETER =
EFFECTIVE SCREEN DIAMETER =
SCREEN LENGTH =
WELL PENETSATION DEPTH =
AQUIFER THICKNESS =
STATIC WATER LEVEL =
AQUIFER CONDUCTIVITY IS =
OR
AQUIFER T R A N S M I S S I V I T Y IS =
OR
8.500 INCHES
4 . 9 0 0 INCHES
7 . 0 0 0 FEET
7 . 0 0 0 FEET
25. 0(JO FEET
£7 .820 FEET
72SE-04 CM/SEC
154E*02 G A L / F T / F T / D A Y
555E-01 CM*CM/SSC
366E+02 G A L / F T / D A Y
; (SJ t t IBB»S*BBBflB8Bfi3»BBB:iB8B88t tSa8t tB3t t3a t !B3a:JB; ta i !
CENSORED DATA END POINTS ARESTART TIME 15 =
END TIME IS
1 5 U E + U 3 SECONDS
100E-MJ4 oE
SE1000BEnvironmental Logger
10/25 09:32
Unit* 00168 T«at« 2
INPUT 1: Iml (?) TOC
ReferenceSeals factorOffset
17.9719.860.00
Step* 0 10/24 12:15
Elapsed Time Value
0.00000.00330.00660.00990.01330.01660.02000.02330.02660.03000.03330.05000.06660.08330.10000.11660.13330.15000.16660.18330.20000.21660.23330.25000.26660.28330.30000.31660.33330.41670.50000.58330.66670.75000.83330.91671.00001.08331.16671.25001.33331.41661.50001.58331.66671.75001.33331.91672.00002.50003.00003.50004.00004.50005.00005.50006.00006.50007.00007.50003.00008.50009.00009.500010.000012.0000
END
17.9718.0318.7918.0518.8518.6718.5818.5218.4618.4018.3618,2018.1018.0518.0218.0017.9817.9717.9717.9717.9717.9717.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9517.9517.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9717.9717.9717.9717.9717.9617.9617.9517.9517.9517.9517.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9617.9517.9517.9517.96
-ifik DM "ft HMD _ 5 T . iiijUfl
LL
o S:i—-i r- -
cc 1J""
o.o 2.0 14.0 6.0
TIME (5ECS
H A R Z Y N E N G I N E E R I N G , I N C .
M A D I S O N . W I S C O N S I N .
B A I L D O H N A N A L Y S I S
DATA OBTAINED BY : PFJ
DATA ANALYZED BY : PFJ
BAIL DOWN PARAMETERS FOR B : M W 2 7 . D A T
EFFECTIVE WELL DIAMETER =
EFFECTIVE SCREEN DIAMETER =
SCREEN LENGTH
WELL PENETRATION DEPTH
AQUIFER THICKNESS =
STATIC HATER LEVEL =
AQUIFER CONDUCTIVITY IS
OR
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY 13 -
OR
2.000 INCHES
2.000 INCHES
7.000 FEET
7.000 FEET
35.000 FEET
17.970 FEET
224E-01 CM/SEC
476E+04 GAL/FT/FT/DAY
:39E+UC CH+CM/SEC
loSE + 05 GAL,'FT/DAY
3BBBBB3B3BBBffBBBB«»«Sfl8B3BB»»8B3BB8a8H3SB333B33
CENSORED DATA END POINTS AEESTART TIME 13
END TIME IS
SECONDS
SECONDS
SE1000BEnvironmental Logger
10/25 05:34
Unit* 00168 Teat* 0
INPUT 1: Level (?) TOC
ReferenceScale factorOffset
Step* 0 10/24
Blapeed Time
0.00000.00330.00660.00990.01330.01660.02000.02330.02660.03000.03330.05000.06660.08330.10000.11660.13330.15000.16660.18330.20000.21660.23330.25000.26660.28330.30000.31660.33330.41670.50000.58330.66670.75000.83330.91671.00001.08331.16671.25001.33331.41681.50001.58331.66671.75001.83331.91672.00002.50003.00003.50004.00004.50005.00005.50008.00006.50007.00007.50008.00008.50009.00009.5000
10.0000END
24.7219.860.00
10:40
Value
24.7124.7225.6524.6625.1325.0925.0725.0325.0124.9924.9724.6924.8424.8024.7724.7624.7524.7424.7324.7324:7324,'. 7324.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7124.7124.7224.7224.7224.7224.7124.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7124.7024.7024.7024.7024.7024.7124.7024.7124.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.7224.72
RRW DflTR H;<JD L"J .SQUflRE FIT
o :
1.0 \ ia.o 1S.O 20.0 ?4.0
TIME (SECS)
W A B Z Y N E N G I N E E R I N G . I N C .
M A D I S O N . W I S C O N S I N .
B A I L D O W N A N A L Y S I S
DATA OBTAINED BY : PFJ
DATA ANALYZED BY •- PFJ
BAIL DOWN PARAMETERS FOR B : M W 2 9 . D A T
EFFECTIVE HELL DIAMETER
EFFECTIVE SCREEN DIAMETER =
SCREEN LENGTH =
WELL PENETRATION DEPTH
AQUIFER THICKNESS =
STATIC WATER LEVEL =
AQUIFER CONDOCTIVITY IS =
OR
AQUIFER T8ANSMISSIVITY IS =
OR
2 . 0 0 0 INCHES
2 . 0 0 0 INCHES
5.300 FEET
5.300 FEET
4 0 . 0 0 0 FEET
24 .720 FEET
197E-01 CM/SEC
417E+04 GAL/FT/FT/DAY
2 4 C 2 + Q 2 CM*CM/3EC
167E+05 G A L / F T / D A Y
CENSORED DATA END POTNTS ARESTART TIME IS =
END TIME IS =
lUCS + 01 SECONDS
900£-t-01 SSC&UDS
* H W D H I H flMD LST.SQUnRE FIT
MU-29
MD LST.SQUflRE FI
-30
8.0 \f2-°
T I M E '(SECS)SO.G
CS)so.o LOO.O 120.0
H A R Z Y N E N G I N E E R I N G . I N C .
M A D I S O N . W I S C O N S I N .
B A I L D O W N A N A L Y S I S
DATA OBTAINED BY : PFJ
DATA ANALYZED BY : PFJ
^ DOWN PARAMETERS FOR B : M W 2 9 . D A T
?KCTIVK WELL DIAMETER•FECTIVE SCREEN DIAMETER =;REEN LENGTH =ILL PENETRATION DEPTH =QUIFER THICKNESS =TAT1C WATER LEVEL *.QUIFEB CONDUCTIVITY IS =
OR
\OUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY IS =OR
2.000 INCHES
2.000 INCHES
5.300 FEET
6.300 FEET
40.000 FEET
24.720 FEET
.197E-01 CM/SEC
.417E+04 GAL/FT/FT/DAY
.24GS+02 CM*CM/3EC
. 167E + G5 G A L / F T / D A Y
CENSORED DATA END POINTS AKE :START TIME IS
END TIME IS
. 100E*01 SECONDS
.900E+01 SECOaDS
I N G . I N C .
0 N S I N.
L Y S I S
?J
?J
MW30.DAT
2.000 INCHES
2.000 INCHES
7 .300 FEET •
7. 300 FEET
50. 000 FEET
14.740 FEET
342-02 CM/SEC
07E+03 GAL/FT/FT/DAY
08E+Q1 CM*OM/SEC
53E-04 <;AL/FT/DAY
•JOE+IU SECONDS
JOE+02 3ECUNDS
SEIOOOBRnvlrooMatal
10/25 09
UnitB 00168 '
INPUT 1: Level
ReferenceScale factorOffset
Step* 0 10/24
Elapsed Time
0.00000.00330.00660.00990.01330.0X660.02000.02330.02660.03000.03330.05000.06660.08330.10000.11660.13330.15000.16660.18330.20000.21680.23330.25000.26660.28330.30000.31660.33330.41670.50000.58330.66670.75000.83330.91671.00001.08331.16671.25001.33331.41661.50001.58331.66671.75001.83331.91672.00002.50003.00003.50004.00004.50005.00005.50006.00006.50007.00007.50008.00008.50009.00009.5000
10.0000END
Logger:31
PMttt 3
(F) TOC
49.5319.860.00
13:40
Value
49.5349.5349.8150.6249.7849.9850.2350.0749.9649.8849.8149.6449.5649.5649.5549.5449.5449.5449.5349.5449.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.53 „49.53.49.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.5349.53
RfiW DlT'fl HMD LS SQUfiRE FI
: -
-
0.0 2.0 6.0 "XS.O 10.0 ia.oTIME (SECS)
W A R 2 Y N E N G I N E E R I N G . I N C .
M A D I S O N . W I S C O N S I N .
B A I L D O W N A N A L Y S I S
DATA OBTAINED BY : PFJ
DATA ANALYZED BY : PFJ
BAIL DOWN PARAMETERS FOR B : M W 3 1 . D A T
EFFECTIVE WELL DIAMETER -
EFFECTIVE SCREEN DIAMETER =
SCREEN LENGTH
WELL PENETRATION DEPTH
AQUIFER THICKNESS
STATIC WATER LEVEL
AQUIFER CONDUCTIVITY IS
OR
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY IS =
OR
2 . 0 0 0 INCHES
2 .000 INCHES
5 . 6 5 U FEET
5.650 FEET
25.000 FEET
49.530 FEET
.257E-01 CM/SEC
.545E+04 GAL/FT/FT/DAY
. 196E+02 CM*CM/SEC
. 13GE-HJ5 GAL/FT/EAY
CENSORED DATA END POINTS AKESTART TIME IS
END TIME IS
SECONDS
SECONDS
Appendix EAnblent Air Sampling Results
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.SUMMARY OF QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
PROJECT NUMBER: 13452.00PROJECT NAME: Hagen Farms
Laboratory Qualifiers (Organic)
U The material was analyzed for, but not detected.
J Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used either whenestimating a concentration for tentatively identified compoundswhere a 1:1 response is assumed, or when the quality controlcriteria are not met.
B This flag is used when the analyte is found in the associatedblank as well as in the sample. It indicates possible blankcontamination and warns the data user to take appropriateaction. This flag must be used for a tentatively identifiedcompound as well as for a positively identified target compound
E The compound was quantitated above the linear calibration range
D The compound was quantitated from an analysis at a secondarydilution factor.
I The tentatively identified compound is an isomeric-type of thecompound reported.
C The tentatively identified compound refers to a class ofcompounds.
Data Validation Qualifiers (Organic)
U The material was analyzed for, but was not detected. Theassociated numerical value is the sample quantitation limit
UJ The material was analyzed for, but was not detected. Theassociated numerical value is an estimated quantity becausequality control criteria were not met.
J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity.
R The data are unusable (compound may or may not be present).Resampling and/or reanalysis is necessary for verification.
APPENDIX EHagen Farms ---UNVALIDATED AMBIENT AIR DATA---
ANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles MATRIX: Ambient Air UNITS: ng
Page 1
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR;
COMPOUNDS
AcetoneBenzeneBrocnodi ch I oromethaneBromoformBromome thane2-ButanoneCarbon TetrachlorideChIorobenzeneChLorodibromomethaneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneHexaneHeptane1.1-Dichloroethane1.2-Dichloroethane1.1-D i chIoroethenetrans-1,2-dichloroethene1.2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzenem-D i chIorobenzenep-DichIorobenzeneo-OichIorobenzeneMethylene ChlorideStyrene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1.1.1-Trichloroethane1.1.2-TrichloroethaneTrichIoroetheneT r i chIorofIuoromethaneo-Xylenem,p-XylenesVinyl ChlorideIsopropyIbenzene
CRQL
2619172128201416281916152119IB1816161516172022192019211312121518121622471620
HF-AA-01-0111/22/881.00
230.00 /E52.00
210.00 /E
8.00 /J
20.00 /J21.00
12.00 /J
8600.00 /S6.00 /J
16.0096.0077.00
10.00 /J1400.00 /E17.00 /J20.00 /J
HF-AA-02-0111/22/881.00
HF-AA-03-1011/22/881.00
HF-AA-03-2011/22/881.00
HF-AA-03-3011/22/881.00
82.0025.00
120.00
540.00 /E
27.00
26.00
6.00 /J
4400.00 /S4.00 /J
8.00 /J210.00 /E33.00
8.00 /J2900.00 /fc22.00 /J44.00 /J
18.00 /J
110.00
3.00 /J
13.00 /J6.00 /J
5.00 /J
1700.00 /E2.00 /J
13.0060.0024.00
5.00 /J970.00 /E6.00 /J9.00 /J
27.00
56.001.00 /J
3.00 /J
16.00 /J7.00 /J
43.00
84.00
6.00 /J
22.0012.00 /J
HF-AA-03-4011/22/881.00
40.0049.00
49.002.00 /J
6.00 /J
10.00 /J
12.00 /J
3.00 n1800.00 /S
5.00 /J
10.00 /J79.0040.00
6.00 /J450.00 /E13.00 /J22.00 /J
16.00 /J
4.00 /J
3500.00 /S6.00 /J
15.0097.0062.00
10.00 /J480.00 /E18.00 /J28.00 /J
18.00 /J
14.00 /J
4800.00 /S6.00 /J
13.0093.0069.00
11.00 /J450.00 /E21.00 /J31.00 /J
1.00 /J 1.00 /J 2.00 /J
SAMPLE ID:SAMPLE DATE:CRQL FACTOR:
COMPOUNDS
AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2-ButaooneCarbon TetrachLorideChIorobenzeneChlorodibromomethaneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethaneHexaneHeptane1.1-Dichloroethane1.2-Di chloroethane1.1-D i chIoroethenetrans-1,2-dichloroethene1.2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene•- D i chIorobenzenep- D i chIorobenzeneo-D i chIorobenzeneMethytene ChlorideStyrene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachIoroetheneToluene1.1.1-Trichloroethane1.1.2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneTrichlorofluoromethaneo-Xylenem,p-XylenesVinyl ChlorideIsopropylbenzene
CRQL
2619172128201416281916152119181816161516172022192019211312121518121622471620
Hagen FarmsANALYSIS TYPE: Volatiles
APPENDIX E-UNVAL1DATED AIR DATA--MATRIX: Ambient Air UNITS: ng
Page 2
HF-AA-04-0111/22/881.00
120.0042.00
58.001.00 /J
5.00 /J
13.00 /J10.00 /J
HF-LA-LH01-011/03/891.00
HF-LA-LH01-91. 1/03/891.00
HF-LA-TB01-011/03/891.00
METHOD BLANK11/22/881.00
METHOD BLANK21/03/891.00
3300.001300.00
8900.00
230.00190.002600.0012000.007200.00
20.00
1800.001600.00
11000.00
220.00170.00
12000.009100.00
20.00
42.00
10.00 /J
19.00 /J
5800.00 /S12.00 /J
7.00 /J61.0058.00
7.00 /J440.00 /E16.00 /J19.00 /J
4900.00
7.00 /J
7800.00
490.0080.00
16.0016000.001200.00
9400.00
12.00 /J
5300.00
950.0050.00
27.008200.002600.00
32.00 5.00 /J
30.00
140.00 17.00 /J
2.00 /J
860.00
11.00 /J
1.00 /J
(1) Results are reported with qualifiers (Data Validation Qualifier/Laboratory Qualifier) to the right of the value.
Appendix FSoil Testing Results
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
CC
U-
UJtrt-U
100 10.0 1.0GRAIN SIZE
3. 1 .01 .001- mm
Symbol X+3"0 3.3
K GRAVEL0.Q
X SAND37.8
X SILT | X CLAY 162.2 I
1 !LL PI
0.03 0.006 ©.0015 G.001S ! 0.68 53.0
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCSBrown Sandy SILT, some Clay ML
Project No.: 13452.98Project: HAGEN FARM RI^FSO Sample: BORING: 22B SAMPLE: 4 & 10.0 FT
: 09X27X39
Remark* :TESTED BY: MML.-'DWH
ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC. heet No.
WARZYN
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
199
9©
UJCJ
9
200 100 10. 0 1.0 0.1SRAIN SI2E - mm
-01 .001
, Symbol £+3*0 0.0
X GRAVEL20.1
X SAND60.6
X SILT . j X CLAY |19.2 I
!————————————————————————————————————————————————— j
LL PI7.5© 0.42 0.35 0.211 0.1700 0.0220 4.S 19.S
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCSBrown Fine-Coarse SAND, Some Gravel > Silt & Clay
Project No.: 13452.98Project: HAGEN FARM RI/FS0 Sample: BORING: 22B SAMPLE: 10 @ 40.© FT
Date: 09x27/99
SN
6RAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTWARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remarks:
TESTED BY: MML-'-BWA
t ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BY:APPROVED EY:
Sheet No.
WARZYN
i
i
96
80
1ty 60»— *U-t- 58UJoffi 4@o_
30
20
10
0
2C
j Symbol1 O
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT£ . . . Ce>w*« M*dlu» ' Fi-w
i
i
j
j
t
[-.
.
i
[
~h~
j
*
' |
;
i ' if i|. i
II*
i:
• «r<--
I
1
0 100 10.0 1.0GRAIN SIZE
y.+ZM X GRAVEL0.0 0. 1
y. SAND8.3
^i •; : . ;
kf " S ! ' :
; \|^ ^-\
\ ! ! !\ :
——
!'] \ : i
i ' t^-i ! -V: ^^*-.
1 ii i '. i i i i
0. 1 .01 .001— mm
y. SILT y. CLAY f69.4 22.2
! i————————— ———————— . ————————————————————————————————————————————————— _ ————————————
LL'•Sy-- 36
1
i
PI
21
iDj35
i
|
D69_ j _ ( _ t _ i - ; _DS© i D30 j DIS j DIQ i Cc Cu
0.02 0.00S j 0.0825 | ii ;
!
f~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONC Brown Lean CLAY, Little Sand
usesCL
Project No.: 13452.98Project: HAGEN FARM RI/FS::• Sample: BORING: 25B SAMPLE: 3 e 7.5 FT
Dstte: 09/27/39
SRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remarks:
TESTED BY: MML/BWA
ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BY: (§-/}
_ APPROVED BY:^Q^
Sheet No.
WARZYN
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT- i i£ d C«*t *« ntdl'ju* P in*
^ Ofl * K, iv i - Ki - S 3 S • 2s £ £'
1
9©
80
70
u] 60i—*Lt_
i- 59UJ
) ffi 40i CL.'
30\,
20
10
26
.
Ii
I
h-
!
1
1
—\
i
r™—
10 100 10
i
i
I
1
i i
i_
i ! i
^: \ 'i ^; \
! j i l l '•*
\X I;
-,
1
ill i ! i i !.0 1.0 0.1 .01 .001
GRAIN SIZE - mm
j Symbol | X+XM X GRAVEL1 o 0.0 0.0
1 LL
1 **Y' 43
i)
PI28
; i
DSS
X SAND i K SILT X CLAY0.0 | 36.5 43.5
D6Q D500.01
I>30 Dl5 Dig, Cc Cu
0.083
i iiMATERIAL DESCRIPTION * USCS
o Brown Lean CLAY ! CL
Project No.: 13452.98\ Project: HAGEN FARM RI^FS
o Sample: BORING: 25E SAMPLE: 6 @ 21.0 FT
Date: 09. '27x89
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remarks:
TESTED BY: MML-- HWA
ENTERED BY: MML
| CHECKED BY: \^^\
_ APPROVED BY: \pl__
iSheet No.
WARZYN
6RAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
100
enUJ
LU-
UJ
r-20
10
0
2C
j Symbol1 0
50 100
X+3"0.0
1 LL
V —iI
y.
10.
i-J
0 1.0GRAIN SI2
GRAVEL16.2
E
X SAND81.3
\ il! i ' l: i i 1 1I i i
b. • : i**•• : l-0.1 .01 .001
! y. SILT i y. CLAY 1! 2.5 |
i iPI
——D85
8.41D63
0.36DS©
0.34D30
0-288
MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONo Er own Fine-Coarse SAND* Some Gravel* Trace
; t i } __
0 . 2352 i © . 2025 I . 1 3 I . S——————— ———————————————— i ———————
iuses
Silt & Clay SP
Project No.: 13452.98Project: HASEN FARM RIxFSO Sample: BORING: 26B SAMPLE: 12 Q! 50.6 FT
Date: 09x27/89GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remar k s :TESTED BY: MML-'BWA
ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BYAPPROVED BY :
Sheet No.
WARZYN
100
90
80
70
CL.
Lt_
1- 50UJo£ 40
30
20
10
023
Symbolo
GRAIN SI
~Ti
i
i
1J
;
:i L
ZE
: r1
-
0 100 10
K+3"0.0
•nj
DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
£"T* .
; iii--
r->V1\\
1
.0 1.0GRAIN SIZE
'/. GRAVEL1.7
! LL
'S"' —1
1
PI—
DSS0.45
•
1'
K —— '—S———— -
! h i ; .! ! i ! ! i ' ! 1 i i
i j ! I i
j
j i\
I\_ ———— ——————— ... ——— _ ———————— i
; 1
; . . !! i
i : i• i
jlf ' ; '•H>! 1 iVN^ :1 1 ! 1 " ~ ^ [; -; T***t
: TT s: 1"""^0.1 .01 .001
— mm
X SAND64.4
X SILT , X CLAY !20.0 13.9
i
D6Q0.31
DS©0.27
D.300.03S
MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONO Broun Fine-Coarse SAND* Some Silt & Clay*
DIS DIQ cc cu0 . ©056 Q . ©©32 1 . 42 99 . 2
jj
usesTrace Gravel SM
Project No.: 13452.98; Project: HAGEN FARM RI/FS0 Sample: BORING: 26B SAMPLE: 14 G! 6©.0 FT
| Remarks:TESTED BY: MML-KWH
j ENTERED BY: MML
Date: 09x27x39| GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
WARZYH ENGINEERING INC.
CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY
Sheet No.
WARZYN
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
on
UJoffiCL
N-
90
30
70
60
50
38
20
10
0
200 100 10.0 1.0 0. 1GRAIN SIZE - mm
.01 .001
Symbol X+3**0 0.0
r
'/. GRAVEL0.0
X SAND0.0
! X SILTj 67.4
' Si CLA'f ij 32. 1
i
LL PI0-01 0.004
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCSBrown SILT, Some Clay ML
Project No.: 13452.98j Project: HAGEN FARM RI^FSO Sample: BORING: 27B SAMPLE: 2 @ 5.0 FT
Date: 09x27x39
SRAIH SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTWARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remarks:TESTED BY: MMLxDWA
ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BY:APPROVES BY :
tSheet Ho
WARZYN
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT« ; : ^ • Co»rc« rWdio* Tin*
90
30
70
£ 60
i t- 50LU
S 40Cu
30.
10
02C
Symbolo
.
: i
;"
-
-
*o-:,
: . -
4-
*3i
1 ^^
-\~\
\i \\
. _._LV.
J
„..
U
—— , —
1.
0 100 10.0 1.0 0. 1GRAIN SIZE - mm
2+3"0.0
i
y. GRAVEL8.1
y. SAND90.3
i ii1 I! i! ( ;.01 .001
y. SILT y. CLAY1.6
i :ii
' LL | PI
N" —iti
• D852.26
i
D .00.45
DSS©,3S
D300.297
Di 50.2254
:
Die cc cu0. 1934 1.02 j 2.3
:
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION usesC Brown Fine-Coarse SAND, Little Gravel, Trace Silt & Clay SP
Project No.: 13432.98 Remarks:; Project: HAGEN FARM RIxFS TESTED BY: MML.'DWA
r. Sample: BORING: 27B SAMPLE: 11 @ 45.0 FTi ENTERED BY: MML
Date: 09X27 89SRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTWARZVH ENGINEERING INC.
i CHECKED BY! \LMI APPROVED BY:I
Ii Sheet No.
WARZYN
1
100i
90
80
70
EC^ 60HH
U.i- 59u]
| fiS 46! 0.
30
20
10
0
2C
SymbolO
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT-• i± £ - C*w*« fwdlu* Fin*
i .£ -£ S .£ * (" a. m, f, «. a, S £
.
i
i
il\ : '
VV
: '- : '• i
': ! : ; i1-
10 100 10
\T ^ s^
1
s
1
: -i
J 11V ;Isd
! ; i:: 1• ; . i i i: ! j: i
: i 1ij + i
* \ ' ' \I •
i l l ! " i ' ;i :
\ 1 ' i
' i
'. i 1•d ! t i :.0 1.0 0. 1 .01 .001
GRAIN SIZE - mm
X-t-3" i X GRAVEL0.0 55. 1
i
! LL
l<v —i
PI—
DSS24.77
y. SAND43.6
X SILT i X CLAY1.3
i
D6016.76
DSQ7.03
D.39 Dl5 Di0 i Cc ! Cu
0.715- 0.3483 6.2864 | 0.17 j 37.6j
I !MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS
O Brown Fine-Coarse GRAVEL & SAND, Trace Silt & Clay ] GP/SP
Project No.: 13452.98; Project: HASEN FARM RI/FS
0 Sample: BORING: 2SB SAMPLE: 2 @ 5.0 FT
Date: 09^27X89
©RAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remarks:
TESTED BY: MML-'T'WA
ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BY: Ql/)1 ~i?i APPROVED BY: O--1 ' i
ij Sheet No.
WARZYN
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
96
88
70
66
50
Si 40
cc
i CL.
t+
*s»
33^
20
10
02G
i Symbol1 O
ii
—
!
i
•
i: i• i
]
50 100
X+3"0.0
X
10.0
GRAVEL0.0
1
LL
K- ... .--j
PI——————— 850.28
l\ i\
t i1 M M! i I i j
s,: • ::-.'•• !! ; !
1.0 0. 1 .01 .001GRAIN SI2E - mm
X SAND X SILT . X CLAY92.6 7.4
D600.23
DS©0.21
l i ,
0. 179 10. 1255 0-0952 ! 1 . 46 2.4(
i!== ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________ j
1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS
i0 Brown
ProjsctProject :O Samp le
:;
Fin* SAND, Little Silt & Cl*y SP-SM
No.: 13452.98HA6EN FARM RIxFS: BOR I NG : 2SB SAMPLE
Remarks:
j TESTED BY: MML^DWAs e 30.0 FT [• ENTERED BY: MML
| CHECKED BY: Q1^D&te: 99/27x89
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTWARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
APPROVED
Sheet No.
WARZYN
100
i90
80
70
ccLU 60i — *U.
i- • 50ui
£} 40Q_
30
20
10
0
2C
Sy mb o 1O
*1
GRAIN SIZc
K, ~ i ^ i £_
.
"t-
'
'
; ;
E DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTCOM* «.* n« j i u* F i A*
* a- a- * » *J^ . ? i * ^ * - r i* •• * it * *
i
-*.X
ii
•*
:
Jh
f
1•«_
w^—— -
1 :
i ' i
1
\ :"1
'
1
---,
\
—
-^
r
hi
I
i
\
+H T" •! • i
>0 100 10.0 1.0 0. 1GRAIN SIZE - mm
X+3" X GRAVEL0.0 1.5
i1
e
• • ii i !.... — >_ — .
j— ————
^ __i
^—— ' —— : -
Vi 'i
1 1 i i i t.01 .001
5i SAND i /i SILT X CLAYIS. 7 j 57.7 25. 1
i
! LL
V ~1
L i
PI—
D85 1 ^60 1 D506. 19 0.02
^30 D15 C]0.307
P i-.!
i |
MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONo Brown SILT* Some Clay & Sand, Trace Gravel
i 1uses
ML
Project No.: 13452.98Project: HAGEN FARM RI^FSj Sample: BORING: 29B SAMPLE: 2 @ 5.0 FT
Date: 09/27x89GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTWARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remar k s :
TESTED BY: MML^DWA
ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:
Sheet No
WARZYN
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTc '
c c £ 'v d ~ ~ " m •$ J
^i3O <• "• " — ^- ^ - ^ ^ » » S • - »
1 90
80
70
£ 60»— *u_f- SO
o^ jnuj 40
30i
! 28.
10
0
2£
, Symbol1 o
t
i
|.
'
i i.^.
•0 100 10
X+3"
3.0
Ny ^\S
: 1
'. ^* i
•
1
S
.11
\
\
NV
[
• 1!
i ; i : ;! i
)i1
i
i i
t
I
Ji1
( |
-J ! i :
^S -—; i i i !
.0 1.0 0.1 .01 .001GRAIN SIZE - mm
X GRAVEL22.2
1 LLw ^™^~'Y
!
PI
——
D8511.22
y. SAND X SILT K CLAY |S6.2 13.4 | S. 1
36Q0.45
D590.36
i -^30 < ^15 i ^10 1 C,- dj
0.19S 0.0419 j 0.0881 1 10.78 55.9
i i! i
1
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - USCS:: Brown Fine-Coarse SAND* Some Gravel & Silt* Little Clay • SM
Pr o j ec t No . : 1 3452 . 98Project: HAGEN FARM RIxFS~ Sample: SAMPLE: 29E SAMPLE: 14 (i 60.0 FT
Date: 09/27 89
GRAIN SI2E DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTWARZYN ENGINEERING INC-
Remar k s:
TESTED BY: MML.-DWH
ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BY: )CAPPROVED BY:i<5"
Sheet No.
WARZYN
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
cc.
U
s
100
80
6©
50
4©
» fJ
1s — '
30
20
10
02G
Symbolo
k-1
——— 1
:
1;
————— ——————————— [_.__( —— .„. —— . ————— r^^ V ——————————1 r > 1 1 i • - ' Tfc 1
1 ! i j i ; i v ;
• i i ; i• I ' '
: i i { I j! !
: . . 1 M i»0 100 10.0 1.0 0.1 .01 .001
GRAIN SIZE - mm1
0.0
—————— \
LLf —
y. GRAVEL0.4
y, SAND j y. SILT |K CLAY i14.8 j 53.3 j 31.5 i
i
PI——
DS50.07
1
360 D500.02
i i
0. 004 j !
i ;1 1 i
> MATERIAL DESCRIPTION j USCSO Brown SILT, Somw Clay & Sand j ML
Project No.: 13452.98Project: HAGEN FARM RI/FSo sample: BORING: 3©B SAMPLE: 2 e 5.0 FT
Date: 39 27x89GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remarks:| TESTED BY: MML^BWA
j ENTERED BY: MML
! CHECKED BY:i APPROVED BY:
Sheet No.
WARZYN
100or
80
70
a:uj 6©
LL
P§ 4©
30
20
16
©
2C
] Symbol' 0
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT5 d e c Can1** - K»aiu,« Fin*
I « * i * 3 S £ i = 5 IS IS• •
i
i
N
;
•i
.
*
i
_ - -
\
'
s\IX
i
*
1
J-\
__ .
\\
•
\
!
!
•
—
•
„—
i10 100 10.0 1.0 0. 1
GRAIN SIZE - mm
7i+3*0.0
I —————— .- -- - - - -
7, GRAVEL8.7
X SAND ;82,4
J; ;
i 1 !ir
i' 1 'H —— ' ——
i j- — i- —— . —— i ———
i•
i
i! f i t i
.01 .001
< SILT K CLAY8.9
'' LL
i^S^ —I
i ' —————————————————————
PI—
B852.72
D600.37 0.28
D3STS I T*. I ^^ <••Di5 j DIQ | C,- Cu
0.175 0. 1312 e. 1054 | S.7S 3.5
iI
MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONo Brown-Fine Coarse SAND, Little Silt? Clay & Gravel
uses| 3P-SM
Project No.: 13432.98Project: HAGEN FARM RI^FS0 Sample: BORING: 3SB SAMPLE: 10 @ 40.0 FT
Remarks:TESTED BY: MML--DWR
ENTERED BV: MML
CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY :
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
WARZYN ENGINEERING INC. Sheet No
WARZYN
100
9&
80
70
uj 60i — i
t- 50MJ
£ 40u_
30
20
10
0
26
Symbolo
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTc" 1 i j L.CH 4* n*>3li*.a ri't*
£ c *i ' C "" *" ""* 5; r5<, ,„ i _ p, ^. A 3 = * 3 £ Si'
————— - - ————— * -- ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————1;
•
'; r XKs
_
r
! * * • •
: i
S-ki•
H"
\;
|
———
10 100 10.0 1.0GRAIN SIZE
X+Z»0.0
X GRAVEL20.8
X SAND
vs
t ti f ( i
1 1 ;
i | . i i i 1 i — 1 —— i-h-M-r —\ —— j• ' !
i j: i i
i i'; i
i i ! ji | j
:* : ' ' , ' • '
JJ 1 ! ;
j i
I I i. i I i I i : I t
0.1 .01 .001- mm
1 X SILT K CLAY54. 1 25. 1
! LL
l^r- —[
i
PI—
iDp"5
9.33D69
0.41DSQ
0.3©
D300. 1Z
Bl5 D1Q 1 cc C,j.3 j 0 . 625© 0.0110] 3 . 93 37 . @
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
ii
j usesO Broun Fine-Coarse SAND» Some Silti Clay & Gravel | SM
Project No.: 13452.98; Project: HAGEN FARM RIxFS
0 Sample: BORING: MW31 SAMPLE: 11 @ 46.5 FT
Date: 09x27x89
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT1 WARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
Remarks:
TESTED BY: MML^BWA
| ENTERED BY: MML
CHECKED BY: QT^
APPROVEB BYivC^v
j Sheet No.
WARZYN
Appendix G
Boring Logs
o>-im
K»Ik
«O
nx7*.a09
•fl*n
N
8ClmoOB-<
^B>HC-
*»N•<a
o*?r—r-
ono—tJO
MH••
i 1 1 ] 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I i j 1 1 | I i i| 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I i j 1 1 1 1 Iw rvj rv> -• -• mO V/l O 1J1 CD
CDRKZi **0 053«g^Sii3 si?.O OM
Cl3g«•-S.S.2^1 £|<o"o£ o^*oer
«882.as£5S|5"*g&i *fl5n
I l l i l l l l M i l l M i l l 1 1 ll 1 M 1 II 1 ill 1 III 1 M 1 ll M 1 M 1 ll 1 1 1 1 ! M 1 ll II II
DEPTHIN FEET
(ELEUATIOH)
BLOUIS/6 IN.ON SAMPLER
RECOVERY X
SYMBOL
SA
MP
LE N
UM
BE
RA
ND
DE
SC
RIP
TION
OF
MA
TE
RIA
LS
SAMPLERAND BIT
CASING TYPE
BLOWS/FOOTON CASINO
UATERCONTENT '/.
LIQUIDLIMIT X
PLASTICLIMIT X
SPECIFICGRAUITY
OTHERTESTS
TES
T RE
SU
LTS
(/>5»
TJl~mX
mTO
8gm
-n-I
r~09Vt
»zoi—m
n•t»*o*£.
09m5O
G>
O»1—r—»O
n2wUIUIo
TtsmO£o-1
iV)
o3<Aw•* »»r+-
o"*>9
n»
SITE NAME AHD LOCATION Hagen Farm
RI/F
S -
Town of D
unkirk - Dane C
ounty, Wisconsin
DATUM M
SL ELEVATION
ytnG>OmT>-«ac
o-tm
1
^ sOO m
«
-J
^ §00 m
^o
-4
m
1m»r-ms1-
£ ^£ *
£ zi s
V)— •>TO-t
t>
•Kt/tX
Monitoring W
ell
owr-r-zo
T)1-
Knm-•
8
Zo(/)M
"H.5*2°O
•*o••atnr*E.
*top*A•1K»OIo\Jk
V)Xm
^•4 ^
O-n
hJ
*»(ft3"Wo•t^5*K
*w^J00
H•t_o'o3«(Bao.O«"to1
o»•—i—zn
m-*
§
*»-i-**k
3
ffiW>
O
N)O
50o<*Pi<-;
oaO»
CD i1 zh-k p
-»Jn
SOIL BO
REHOLE LO
G
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PT
HIN
FE
ET
(EL
EV
AT
ION
)
BLO
US
/6 IN
.O
N
SA
MP
LER
RE
CO
VE
RY
'/.
SY
MB
OL
SHEET
2 OF 2
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SAM
PLER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
O
TYP
E
BL
OW
S/F
OO
TO
N
CA
SIN
O
BORING NO.
B-17CTEST RESULTS
WA
TER
CO
NT
EN
T
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
%
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
OTH
ER
TE
ST
S
—40
-45
—50
—55
—60
-*-
Z~65
—70
—75
—SO
End Boring at 64*
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
•HI I I I 1 I I I I | I I I I | I I I I | I I I I | I I I I | I I I I | I I I I I iTI I | I I II | I! I I j I I II | I I II | II II
•"-8 -5. . -
gaS-8
r i
-8 a•q a
DEPTHIN FEET
(ELEUATION)
BLOUS/6 IN.ON SAMPLER
RECOVERY X
SYMBOL
DmC/lo?oi—iTJH
2H
c/i>
*0r
SAMPLERAND BIT
CASING TYPE
BLOWS/FOOTON CASINQ
WATERCONTENT X
LIQUIDLIMIT •/.
PLASTICLIMIT Y.
SPECIFICQRAUITY
OTHERTESTS
n2M-jUl
CflP"
00»U>Uo
DO•»*a-o<-»OHPC
§
oou>
oa
Bn3n
8
O
noA(DO.
w»o
oo« zotflfasH.5*«
r>
a
00
Ut
00
8
(/)gCDOmOr-mr-O
ceH-w(SI
a\Uio
ECc/iothJwUl
4
33or»0•«^
00«Uio
oo
COI
n
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PTH
IN FE
ET
< E
LE
VA
TIO
N)
BLO
US
/6 IN
.O
N
SA
MP
LE
R
REC
OVE
RY
X
SYM
BO
L
SHEET . BORING NO.
2 OF 2 B-17CR
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SAM
PLER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
Q
TY
PE
BL
OW
S/F
OO
TO
N
CA
SIN
Q TEST RESULTS
WA
TER
CO
NTE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
OTH
ER
TE
ST
S
—40
—45
—so
—55
—60
tT 800. 5_
—65
=-70
—75
—80
End Boring at 63'
—
—
• —
—
—
—
—
—
—
'H
BLOUS/6 IN.ON SAMPLER
30cn
II I I | I I I I j I I I I | II I I | I I M | I I I I | I M I | I I M| I I I ! [1 I ll| I III | II I I | I II I | I I IIijj rvi ro _> _. uio wi QJ ui o
03"• £
*
0»3
23
3O** 3
S?
^* Sc'o3-a
O
•*••o tsr«O
13
S « »-.—oM j fO3 s^.3 »—'
^ 5'
£.**. hCO S 3
£ <
11 M In n I i i 11 In 1 1 1 1 1 i i l i M i l i i nl i ml n i i l i MI I M i i 111 i i 11 M i h 111
DEPTHIN FEET
(ELEVATION)
oMWO*
HmCOtn
SAMPLERAND BIT
CASINO TYPE
BLOWS/FOOTON CASING
WATERCONTENT Y.
LIQUIDLIMIT X
PLASTICLIMIT X
SPECIFICGRAUITY
OTHERTESTS
oSM-4O»
8O•*»
OBa
§
oo-JON
*fc00In
<nnn
np.nAa
o•oA
=r«
00K»
00M00VO
«bo
Hnsr
S3»ao.w»
8
n5"»i
K»3
CA•o
(e*n•*i
Uli&ooI/I
o*»»1X
w(AsrCOo
8
Ul Cfl•9OOBy-vWWl
X•Q.
^JU>
00«
00
00*o
woo
**u»o
n*u»•J00
Ho"oao»9a
g09ro PCD
(AOr-00omIOr—mO
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagcn Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PTH
IN
FE
ET
(EL
EU
AT
ION
)
BL
OU
S/6 IN
..ON
SA
MPL
ER
RECO
VER
Y
X
SYM
BO
L
SHEET2 OF 2
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SAM
PLER
AND
BIT
CA
SIN
G
TYPE
BLO
US/
FOO
TON
C
ASI
NG
BORING NO.
B-22BTEST RESULTS
UA
TER
CON
TEN
T X
OM 1-D M
M M
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
a m111 Hz tnH Ul0 H
-
I_
§«o—
827.4,826.9-
—50
_
~55
E"60
E"65
—70
Z-75
^-80
11/12/b
42/41/31
31/74/fe"
55
55
30
i • i_ iY - Y i '
i ' !
r v r! • r i
Y : Y i 'i - r i
' s -Y !"
; i" i"
10
11
12
Some Gravel, Silt and Clay at 40'
Scattered Silty Gravelly Seams at 43-49'
1 Light Yellow Brown (10YR 6/4) Pine SAND, Trace fWlLittle Silt (SP/SM) /
End Borinc at 40.5'"Other T«t§" indicates HNu reading! on soil samples
in ppm.
SSB
SS
SSB
-
—
—
—
—
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
0-2
2-4
0-2
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagcn Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 859.70DRILL RIG D50 BombANGLE Vertical SEARING —————
SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE FT. -IBS
DE
PT
HIN
F
EE
T<
EL
EU
AT
ION
>
BL
OU
S/6
IN
.O
N
SA
MP
LER
RE
CO
VE
RY
y.
SY
MB
OL
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4" I.D. HSA BCRING NO.
B-25SHEET
SAMPLING METHOD: No Sampling, Earth Drill to 1 OF 1
Install Monitoring Well DRILLING
WATER LEVELTIME
DATE
IAS1NG DEPTH
START FINISH
6.2' TIME TIME
1300 1400DATE DATE
8/15/89 8/15/89SURFACE CONDITIONS Level, vegetated
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SAM
PLER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
Q
TY
PE
BL
OU
S/F
OO
TO
N
CA
SIN
Q TEST RESULTS
UIA
TER
CO
NTE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
'/.
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
'/.
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
OTH
ER
TE
ST
S
—5
E 1
— 10
/715 844.2.
IT20
—30
E&rth Drill 0-15.0', No Sampling Conducted
For & description of geologic conditions, refer toBoring Log B-2SB
End Boring at 15.5'
^ LOGGED BY RSL. Warzvn
DATE 11/6/89 CHK'D SY PFJDRILLING CONTR
—
—
ETI
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 859.70
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4" I.D. HSA 0-8.0', 3
7/8" Tricone, Rotary Wash Boring w/ ClearWater 8.0-42.0'SAKPLING METHOD: 2" Split Spoon (SS),
Hydropunch (HP)
WATER LEVEL
TIMEDATE
USING DEPTH
6.3'1400
8/14/89
BORING NO.
B-25BSHEET
1 OFDRILLING
START
T I M E
1330DATE
8/14/89
FINISH
TIME
1200DATE
8/15/89DRILL RIG D50 Bomb SURFACE CONDITIONS Lowland grass and scrub vegetation; formerlyANGLE Vertical BEARING tilled land.SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE 350 FT.-LBS
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SA
MP
LER
AN
D
BIT
TEST RESULTS
UA
TER
CO
NTE
NT
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
Y.
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
y.
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
ER TS
O T
Black (7.5 N2/) Organic TOPSOIL
mack, Mottiea urganic LJUAY
Light Brown-Gray flOYR 6/2} Mottled L«an Clay,Littl* Sand, Moiit, Soft
salt, uray L«an C;LAV jLittie sandLight Yellow Brown (10YR 6/4) Fine to MediumSAND, Little Fine Gravel, Tract Silt (SP), Wet,Medium Dense to Denie
Dark Gray Fine SAND, Some Silt, Trace Organic!(SM), Wet, LOOM to Medium Denie
Lignt crownun uray IIUYK exi i*«an UI.AX, 1,1 cuePine Sand (CL), StiffMany Thin (1/8") Steeply Dipping Fine to MediumSand Se»m* (SP)
Light Yellow Brown (10YR 6/4) Pine to MediumSAND, Trace Silt, Little to Some Gravel (SP),Saturated, Denie
Light Yellow Brown (10YR 6/4) Pine toSAND, Trace to Littfe Silt, Little to So(SP), Dense to Very Dense
CoaneSome Gravel
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSHP
0.4
0.2
0.5
0.0
0.2
0.1
LOGGED BY GFP. WarzvnDATE
DRILLING CONTR ETI
1/24/90 C H K ' D BY PFJ
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PTH
IN
FE
ET
<£LE
UA
TIO
N>
BL
OU
S/6
IN
.O
N
SAM
PLER
RECO
UER
Y
X
SYM
BO
L
SHEET
2 OF 2
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SAM
PLER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
G
TY
PE
BL
OW
S/FO
OT
ON
CA
SIN
G
BORING NO.
B-25BTEST RESULTS
UA
TER
CO
NTE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AU
ITY
OTH
ERT
ES
TS
823.7.I
-
—40
817.7—
—45
—50
—60
I"65
—70
—75
—80
34/40726/St!
7/35/27/13
6
-prtr:y iI ; ' ! 1
V - V i 1
! : ' : '
9
10
Brown Fine Silty SAND, Trace to Little Gravel (SM),Saturated, Very DenseScattered Seams of Brown Fine to Coarse Sand,Little Silt at 38-42'
End Boring at 42.0'
"Other Test!" indicates HNu readings on soil samplesin ppm.
ss
ssHP
-
-
—
-—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagcn Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 881.70DRILL RIG CME 75
ANGLE Vertical JEARING ......
SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE FT.-LBS
DE
PT
HIN
FE
ET
<E
LE
UA
TIO
N)
BLO
WS
/6
IN.
ON
S
AM
PLE
R
RE
CO
VE
RY
y.
SY
MB
OL
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4" I.D. HSA w/ Center BObit 0-34.0*
RING NO.
B-26SHEET
SAMPLING METHOD: No Sampling, Earth Drill to 1 OF 1
Install Monitoring Well DRILLINGSTART FINISH
UATER LEVEL
TIME
DATE
CASING DEPTH
25.1'1500
7/14/89
TIME TIME
0900 1030DATE DATE
7/14/89 7/14/89SURFACE CONDITIONS Grassy and wooded, gentle slope to west.
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SA
MP
LER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
G
TY
PE
BLO
WS
/FO
OT
ON
C
AS
INO TEST RESULTS
UA
TE
RC
ON
TE
NT
'/.
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT y
.S
PE
CIF
ICG
RA
UIT
Y
OTH
ER
TE
ST
S
—5
— 10
—20
—30
~ 847. 7_- —
Blind Dnll 0-34.0', No Sampling; Conducted
For a description of geologic conditions, refer toBoring: Log; B-26B
End Bnrinir at 34'
* LOGGED BY RSL. WarzvnDATE 11/6/89 CH<'0 BY_PFJ
DRILLING CONTR
—
—
ETI
II I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I l | I I ! I | H I I j I!I I| II l \ , , I 1 ! 1 I I I ! | I I I 1 [ I 1 i I | I 1 I 1 | 1 I I I
9.00
C/lsec
A ««-°O 10
ffiw
WH
on"> 3u O
6c"^3*02
o?2°-'O
o
DEPTHIN FEET
(ELEUATION)
BLOUIS/6 IN.ON SAMPLER
RECOUERY X
SYMBOL
amur>O70
Oy r^ > wO 2:
Hm
rC/l
tarn33
SAMPLERAND BIT
CASING TYPE
BLOWS/FOOTON CASING.
WATERCONTENT X
LIQUIDLIMIT X
PLASTICLIMIT X
SPECIFICQRAUITY
OTHERTESTS
O2M-otn
3O••»
Oc3
ng=
0000
\oo
c/>
o
*ooana.•ana
o"O«
ffi*<o-oT»ean
90or*ta"1«<*»
K»o\ 8
oo«K*«
K>3
V)•d
u\ia.oo
C/i•aooaWW
[/i
u>VI
00
00o
o00oo
_ m00I
N>
00
enOI—00omIOr—m
1 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 ! 1 | 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1 ,O3 ^J -g t>
H- h- h-i
M <O *•1 1 1
0 _
^ ^L1 M
1 1 1 1o-
.rf
1 i I Ik/1Wl
•j&
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 in 1 1 1 1] 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1 | 1 II 1\J\ f~ **•
oowI-1
A-
M Wo wM
00 00w to
*- (01 1
M M *-H 00 00
M 00 M
1
d
Matx)o3.D**O
OD
sn
Tan SA
ND
STO
NE
Bee
Cutting* and
Hard
Dril
E*i="S£,*•
«J3A
o•1t»5'a
£mao
igll-»CJ1
3?,raV^"?3^5?Ba a
•A
o"*«ffA
o>•«;oaO
5m
^ii.
^$5ii
-N
$1 1$
i
^iI
*.
^vXXxx
<A ffiu> cnI/I
Mm•g^
j»
15a(0
SaaCD3ar«
gX
SS^
Ifltflf
l&
!-°»S-<?3?|33 we?o-"td-^3s?S133O1
5V
cVi
w-«0 «nf"<ffPO
5"TOi!lSi,^r^s^oo
»*2
CCcfl•d Ji
I— ' .. - - -
L _
»-> t-« i-»M K- O
ST*SItfSf3ftw
'$%~*~
*g§ a>o.""--o—*?, — .A
"S.i?'°33'fH« -
A
ww0 S3 "
A §
^2 °33it*_ ^3to-5b* »•
£*5«X —a2i =5X
5A
Cf>"2C
fF1P
C
O
in 33 w to
i i i i h i i i l i i i i l i i i i i i i i i i i i i h i 1 ll II .ill 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 II II mi 1 1 1 1 M i l l 1 1 1 1 1 Ml l l l l t 1
DEPTHIN FEET
(ELEVATION)
BLOUS/6 IN.ON SAMPLER
RECOVERY Y.
SYMBOLS
AM
PLEA
DE
SC
RIP
TION
oz z:a§2 S> raH wm 50?o>rC/3
SAMPLERAND BIT
CASING TYPE
BLOWS/FOOTON CASING
UATERCONTENT '/.
LIQUIDLIMIT %
PLASTICLIMIT K
SPECIFICGRAUITY
OTHERTESTS
monH»m00Cr3
H £o ->* m
3 z0 £«» mi— i >? SB r-E! R
< SU NM9 »» ^2*B
n a? -1arm
RI/F
S -
nty, W
isconsin
XinK» HJ
O
N*
03O
oo i1 z10 Po»DO
(/)gi—00o73mXOr-mr-Oo
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 870.30
DRILL RIG CME 75
ANGLE Vertical SEARING —————
SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE FT. -IBS
DE
PTH
IN
FE
ET
(ELE
UA
TIO
N)
BLO
US
/6
IN.
ON
S
AM
PLE
R
RE
CO
UE
RY
'/.
SY
MB
OL
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4" I.D. HSA 0-25.0' scRING NO.
B-27SHEET
SAMPLING METHOD: No Sampling, Earth Drill to 1 OF 1
Install Monitoring Well DRILLING
UATER LEVEL
TIME
DATE
:ASING DEPTH
15.4'0900
7/27/89
START FINISH
TIME TIME
1100 1330DATE DATE
7/26/89 7/26/89SURFACE CONDITIONS Vegetated, level
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SA
MP
LER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
Q
TY
PE
BLO
US
/FO
OT
ON
C
AS
INQ TEST RESULTS
UA
TE
RC
ON
TE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
%
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
%
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AU
ITY
OTH
ER
TE
ST
S
—5
— 10
IT20
~ 25 845.3
{-»
Earth Drill 0-25.0', No Sampling Conducted
For a description of geologic condition*, refer toBoring Log B-27B
End Boring at 25'
^ LOGGED BY RSL, Warzyn
DATE 11/6/89 CHK'D BY PFJDRILLING CONTR
—
—
ETI
BLOUS/6 IN.ON SAMPLER
KlJk
TS
r-tL.
»N<9
;co
T
B> C3 O
riOID1bS
O
I
*o
PIH I I I I I I I H ll I 111 I I I II III II I I I I I I I III II II I H I ll I I I I
DEPTHIN FEET
(ELEUATION)
Omo2oH
Hhi
m
ta
SAMPLERAND BIT
CASING TYPE
BLOUS/FOOTON CASING
UIATERCONTENT Y.
LIQUIDLIMIT Y.
PLASTICLIMIT '/.
SPECIFICGRAUITY
OTHERTESTS
_] V)o =;^ fn9 z
« i—, m
O £C «="
Is•t >
> i
o So ^-jB *
? 3< »-< M«
O C/)
5"
O —
00
O3
cnOr-CDO71mIOi—m
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGS I T E NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PTH
IN
FEE
T(E
LE
VA
TIO
N)
BL
OU
S/6
IN
.O
N
SAM
PLER
REC
OV
ERY
X
SYM
BO
L
SHEET BORING NO.
2 OF 2 B-27B
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SAM
PLER
AND
BIT
CA
SIN
O
TY
PE
BL
OW
S/FO
OT
ON
C
ASI
NG TEST RESULTS
UA
TE
RC
ON
TEN
T X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
V.
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
OTH
ERT
ES
TS
—40
827.4
—45
- 50 819.9_
—55
—60
—65
—70
—75
—80
13/15/22
5/5/9
6/10/15
10
11
12
Light Yellow Brown (10YR 6/41 Fine to CoarseSAND, Trace to Little Fine Gravel, Trace Silt andClay (SP) Medium D*n»« to Denie
End Boring at 50'
SSHP
SS
SSHP
—
—
=
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 862.00
DRILL RIG CME 75
ANGLE Vertical JEARING —————
SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE FT.-LBS
DE
PT
HIN
FE
ET
<E
LE
UA
TIO
N)
BLO
US
X6
IN.
ON
S
AM
PLE
R
RE
CO
VE
RY
y.
SY
MB
OL
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4" I.D. HSA 0-17* soRING NO.
B-28SHEET
SAMPLING METHOD: No Sampling, Earth Drill to 1 OF 1
Install Monitoring Well DRILLING
UATER LEVEL
TIME
DATE
CASING DEPTH
7.3'0950
7/31/89
START FINISH
TIME TIME
0700 0900DATE DATE
7/31/89 7/31/89SURFACE CONDITIONS Vegetated, sand and gravel at surface, oldgravel pit floor, disturbed by heavy equipment travel.
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SA
MP
LER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
G
TY
PE
BLO
WS
/FO
OT
ON
C
AS
INO TEST RESULTS
UA
TE
RC
ON
TE
NT
V,
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
y.
PLA
ST
ICLIM
IT
Y.
SP
EC
IFIC
QR
AU
ITY
——
——
——
——
— i
OT
HE
RT
ES
TS
—5
— 10
— 15
845.0.
E~20
—25
—30
Earth Drill 0-17.0', No Sampling Conducted
For a description of geologic condition*, refer toBoring Log B-28B
End Boring at 17.0'
^ LOGGED BY RSL. Warzvn
DATE 11/6/89 CHK'D BY PFJDRILLING CONTR
—
—
ETI
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGS I T E NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 861.70
D R I L L I N G METHOD: 4 1/4" I.D. HSA 0-7.5',
Rotary Wash Boring w/ 3 7/8" Tricone andClear Water 7.5-45'SAMPLING METHOD: 2.0n Split SpOOU (SS),
Hydropunch (HP)
WATER LEVEL
TIMEDATE
IAS1NG DEPTH
8.6'0840
7/28/8938.5'
6.9'0815
7/31/89
BORING NO.
B-28BSHEET
1 OF
D R I L L I N GSTART
TIME
1100DATE
7/27/89
F I N I S H
T I M E
1130DATE
7/28/89D R I L L RIG CME 75 SURFACE CONDITIONS Sand and gravel at surface, old gravel pitANGLE Vertical BEARING floor, disturbed by heavy equipment travel, some fill in vicinity.SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE FT.-LBS
•z.t- oI UJ MK UJ t-a IL i111 2a z iu
M _|UJ
in
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
o: i-ILJ M_l 03ar o<x -z<n <L
o
TEST RESULTS
H•z.tr uUJ I-i- -z.<n o3 O
aM I-D H
O XMt- I-tn M<X E_l Ma. j
oH >u. i-W HO DUJ (tn a<n a
a enUJ I-z (nh- UJo i-
_ e
—10
— 15
844.2.
—20
— 25
—30
1/18/6
3/5/6
5/8/7
20/12/13
4/3/5
3/3/4
3/2/3
3/4/6
5/3/7
15
56
45
20
30
40
50
55
Pale Brown to Liffht Yellow Brown (10YR 6/3-4)Fine to Co*r«e SAND and GRAVEL, Trace to LittleSilt, Trace Cobblea, Loose to Medium Dense
Trace Silt at 3.5-17.5'(Ponible Fill 0-2', Former Gravel Pit Floor)
Trace to Little Gravel at 12-17.5'
Light Yellow Brown (10YR 6/4} PinTSAND, Traceto Little Silt and Clay (SP), LOOM to Medium Denee
Fine to Medium Sand at 23'
Scattered Gravel Seams at 33-37.5'
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSHP
SS
SSHP
LOGGED BY RSL. WarzynDATE
D R I L L I N G COHTR ET1
1/24/90 CHK'D BY PFJ
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagcn Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PTH
IN
FE
ET
(EL
EU
AT
ION
)
BL
OU
S/6
IN
.O
N
SA
MP
LER
RE
CO
UE
RY
X
SY
MB
OL
SHEET
2 OF 2
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SA
MP
LER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
G
TY
PE
BL
OW
S/F
OO
TO
N
CA
SIN
Q
BORING NO.
B-28BTEST RESULTS
WA
TER
CO
NTE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PL
AS
TIC
LIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
QR
AU
ITY
OTH
ER
TE
ST
S
—
—40
~ 45 816.7
-
—50
^-60
Z~65
—70
—75
-80
3/4/5
5/8/5
65
10
iIn Scattered Gravel Seam* at 43-45'
End Boring at 46'
SS
SSHP
—
—
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 875.60
DRILL RIG CME 75
ANGLE Vertical SEARING —————
SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE FT. -IBS
DE
PT
HIN
F
EE
T(E
LE
VA
TIO
N)
BLO
US
/6
IN.
ON
S
AM
PLE
R
RE
CO
UE
RY
'/.
SY
MB
OL
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4" HSA BCRING NO.
B-29SHEET
SAMPLING METHOD: No Sampling, Earth Drill to 1 OF 1
Install Monitoring Well DRILLING
WATER LEVEL
TIME
DATE
:ASING DEPTH
24.7'1040
8/15/8929'
START FINISH
TIME TIME
0930 1040DATE DATE
8/15/89 8/15/89SURFACE CONDITIONS Small stand of trees in swale area south ofcornfield.
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
__ c
— 10
— 15
—20
\£
- 846.6
—30
SA
MP
LER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
G
TY
PE
BLO
UIS
/FO
OT
ON
C
AS
INO TEST RESULTS
WA
TE
RC
ON
TE
NT
'/.
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
'/.
PLA
ST
ICLIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AU
ITY
OT
HE
RT
ES
TS
Earth Drill 0-29', No Sampling Conducted
For a description of geologic conditions, refer toBoring Log B-29B
End Boring at 29'
^ LOGGED BY PFJ. Warzvn
DATE 11/6/89 CHK'O BY PFJDRILLING CONTR
—
—
ETI
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGS I T E NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 875.80
D R I L L I N G METHOD: 4 1/4" I.D. HSA w/ CenterPlug 0-30', 3 7/8" Tricone with Clear Water30-60'SAMPLING METHOD: 2" Split SpOOn (SS),
Hydropunch (HP) and BK Pump (BK)
UATER LEVEL
TIMEDATE
:ASING DEPTH
21.7'1400
8/11/8930'
B O R I N G NO.
B-29BSHEET
1 OF
DRILLING
START
TIME
1100DATE
8/11/89
F I N I S H
TIME
1100DATE
8/15/89D R I L L RIG CME 75 SURFACE CONDITIONS Small stand of trees in swale area south ofANGLE Vertical BEARING cornfield.SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE 350 FT.-L8S
H OX UJ HH UJ I-a u. <rUJ 3O Z UJ
M _lUJ
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
tr t-uj HJ QQQ.r a<t z(0 <X
OB£inTEST RESULTS
za ujUJ I-\- z<I O3 O
OM I-D HOf ZM H-J -I
(0 M<I CJ MD. J
OH >IL KH HO DUJ <LD. [I<n u
tE tnUJ I-i int- uO t-
—5
867.8.
— 10
-15
—20
—25849.8.
—30
3/3/6
7/5/8
6/9/10
6/13/14
11/18/16
4/6/8
8/8/15/25
12/11/16
65
80
65
55
65
65
55
100
55
Reddish Brown (SYR 5/4} SILT. Little to Some Clayand Sand, Trace Gravel (ML), Trace Roots, Dry,Loo»e to Medium D«nw
Moiit »t 5' no roots
Very Pale Brown-Light Yellow Brown flOYR 6-7/4)Fine to Coane SAND and GRAVEL (SP-GP), Dry,Medium Dense to Dense, Rounded to Angular, PoorlySorted
Moist at 15'
Light Yellow Brown (10YR 6/4) Fine to CoarseSAND, Little Gravel (SP), Wet, Medium DenseDense
to
Less Gravel and Coane Sand at 35'
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
1.0
1.0
LOGGED BY PFJ. Warzyn D R I L L I N G CONTR ETI
D A T E 11/6/89 CHK'D BY PFJ
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGS I T E NAME AND LOCATION Hagcn Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PTH
IN
FE
ET
(EL
EV
AT
ION
)
BL
OL
JS/6
IN
.O
N
SAM
PLER
REC
OV
ERY
X
SYM
BO
L
SHEET
2 OF 2
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SAM
PLE
RA
ND
B
IT
CA
SIN
Q
TY
PE
BL
OW
S/FO
OT
ON
C
AS
INQ
BORING NO.
B-29BTEST RESULTS
WA
TER
CO
NTE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PLA
STIC
LIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
838. 3_
—40
E—45
—50
~ 823.3.
_
—55
~ 818.3
~ -n 815.8
^-
—65
— 70
—75
—80
12/11/11
16/18/14
15/23/11
7/18/43
16/8/7
SS
45
66
65
65
V; r i'
! - I !
; • I !
v":r:v r
V ' i i '
- 1 i
i r
10
11
12
13
14
Lijht Yellow Brown (10YR 6/4} Silty Fin* MediumSAND, Wet, Medium Dense to Dense
Less Silty at 45'
Silty at SO1
Lifht Yellow Brown Fine to Medium SAND, TraceSilt and Clay, Wet, Very Dense
Light Yellow Brown 1 10YR 6/41 Fine to CoarseSAND, Some Gravel [up to 21*) and Silt, Little Clay(SM) Wet, Medium Dense
End Borinj at 60'
"Other Tests" indicates HNu readings on soil samplesin ppm.
SSHP
SS
SSHP
SS
SSBK
-
—
— . ——
~
—
z
~
-
~—
—
—
—
—
OTH
ERT
ES
TS
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 866.40
DRILL RIG CME 75
ANGLE Vertical SEARING —————
SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE FT. -IBS
DE
PT
HIN
F
EE
T(E
LE
VA
TIO
N)
BLO
US
/6
IN.
ON
S
AM
PLE
R
RE
CO
VE
RY
X
SY
MB
OL
DRILLING METHOD: 4
Bit1/4" I.D. HSA w/ Center BCRING NO.
B-30SHEET
SAMPLING METHOD: No Sampling, Earth Drill to 1 OF 1
Install Monitoring Well DRILLING
WATER LEVEL
TIME
DATE
USING DEPTH
10.9'0800
7/24/89
START FINISH
TIME TIME
1030 1220DATE DATE
7/21/89 7/21/89SURFACE CONDITIONS Level, vegetated
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SA
MP
LER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
G
TY
PE
BLO
WS
/FO
OT
ON
C
AS
INO TEST RESULTS
UA
TE
RC
ON
TE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PLA
ST
ICLIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
OT
HE
RT
ES
TS
__ c
E-'fc
— 15
—20
-25 841.4_
—30
Earth Drill 0-25.0', No Sampling Conducted
For a description of geologic condition*, refer toBoring Log B-SOB
End Boring at 25'
^ LOGGED BY RSL. Warzvn
DATE 11/6/89 CHK'D 8Y_PFJDRILLING CONTR
—
—
ETI
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 866.40
DRILLING METHOD: 4 1/4" I.D. HSA 0-25',Rotary Wash Boring w/ 3 7/8" Tricone andClear Water 25-45'SAMPLING METHOD: 2" Split SpOOH (SS),
Hydropunch (HP) (Water Samples)
WATER LEVEL 11.3'TIME
DATE
:ASING DEPTH
08157/27/89
BORING NO.
B-30BSHEET
1 OF
DRILLING
START
TIME
1400DATE
7/21/89
F I N I S H
TIME
1600DATE
7/24/89DRILL RIG CME 75 SURFACE CONDITIONS Level, vegetatedANGLE Vertical SEARING
SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE 350 FT.-LBS
K OXW Ht- UJ t-0. U. <XUJ =>Q Z HI
M _|UJ
§s3zD°
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
o: h-UJ IHJ 030.r a<r zen a
TEST RESULTS
ztr ujiu i-i- z<i o3 o
O XHt- H01 H<I Z-J Ha. _t
oH >IL KW MO DUJ <XD. tren o
a: tnUJI 01t- UJO (-
Dark Brown (7.5YR 3/2) Silty TOPSOIL
Brown SJLT, some (Jlay, Trace fine Sand
V«ry Stiff to Hard, Dark Brown (7.5YR 4/4} SILT,Some Clay and LittU to Some Sand, Rootn
Brown (10YR 6/4} Fin« to Coarw SAND, Little toSome Gravel, Trace Silt (SP) Medium Dense
Scattered Gravel and Sand Seams 10-17-5'
Medium D«n»e, Yellow Brown [10YR 5/4) Fine toCoarse SAND, Trace to Little Silt, Trace to LittleGravel (SP-SM}
Fine to Medium Grained Sand at 27'
Scattered Seams of Brown Fine Silty Sand (SM) to33'Yellow Brown (10YR 5/4) Fine to Coarse SAND,Trace to Some Silt, Clay and Gravel (SM) Medium
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSHP
LOGGED BY RSL. WarzvnDATE
DRILLING CONTR ETI
1/24/90 C H K ' D BY PFJ
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PT
HIN
FE
ET
(ELE
VA
TIO
N)
BLO
US
/6 IN
.O
N
SA
MP
LER
RE
CO
VE
RY
X
SY
MB
OL
SHEET BORING MO.
2 OF 2 B-30B
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SA
MP
LER
AN
D" B
IT
CA
SIN
Q
TY
PE
BLO
US
/FO
OT
ON
C
AS
INQ TEST RESULTS
WA
TE
RC
ON
TE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PLA
ST
ICLIM
IT X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
OTH
ER
TE
ST
S
—
_
_
—40
—45
820.0
—
—50
—55
—60
—65
— 70
—75
—80
5/5/7
5/6/6
1 ; 1 1
' I ' - V J '
I" V !'
I ; ' ! '
1 i !'
1 ,' i
i rr
10
11
End Boring at 46.4
SS
SSHP
—
_=
™-
~
=
—
—
—
—
—
—
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGS I T E NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DATUM MSL ELEVATION 905.00
D R I L L I N G METHOD: 4 1/4" J.D. HSA 0-21.5%
Rotary Wash Boring w/ 3 7/8" RB, ClearWater 21.5-55.0'SAMPLING METHOD: 2" Split SpOOn (SS)
WATER LEVEL
TIMEDATE
CASING DEPTH
BORING NO.
B-31SHEET
1 OF
DRILLING
START
TIME
1500DATE
8/16/89
F I N I S H
TIME
0715DATE
8/18/89D R I L L RIG D50 Bomb SURFACE CONDITIONS Gravel pit property, sand and gravel atANGLE Vertical BEARING surface, topsoil and clay previously stripped.SAMPLE HAMMER TORQUE 140 FT.-LBS
h- OXUI HI- UJ J-D.IL <EUJ =>O Z UJ
w _|UJ
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
UJ H_i ma.E o<r zV) <i
TEST RESULTS
za uUJ t-I- Z<I O3 O
QH I-—1 I I
o x
to H<r i:
oM >U. KM HO DUJ <Ia o:
aUJ KII- UJO
— 10
.-*—15
886.0_
—20
-25
-30
12/22/32
11/19/23
21/36/33
4450/4"
5050/4"
16/15/22
2847/36
50/4"
8050/4"
65
90
90
55
55
50
45
15
30
I
Light Yellow Brown (lOYR 6/4) Fine to CoarseSAND, Trace Silt and Clay. Little to Some Gravel,Tract Cobble*, Boulder (SP) Dry, Dense to VeryDense
Light Brown (7.5YR 6/4) Fine SAND, Little to SomeSilt, Clay, and Gravel (SM), Moilt, Dense to VeryDense
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
LOGGED BY RSL. Warzvn DRILLING CONTR EJI
DATE 11/6/89 C H K ' D BY PFJ
SOIL BOREHOLE LOGSITE NAME AND LOCATION Hagen Farm RI/FS -Town of Dunkirk - Dane County, Wisconsin
DE
PT
HIN
F
EE
T(E
LE
VA
TIO
N)
OLO
US
/6 IN
.O
N
SA
MP
LER
RE
CO
VE
RY
X
SY
MB
OL
SHEET BORING NO.
2 OF 2 B-31
SAMPLE NUMBERAND
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS SA
MP
LER
AN
D
BIT
CA
SIN
O
TY
PE
BLO
WS
/FO
OT
ON
C
AS
INO TEST RESULTS
UA
TE
RC
ON
TE
NT
X
LIQ
UID
LIM
IT
X
PLA
ST
ICLIM
IT
X
SP
EC
IFIC
GR
AV
ITY
OT
HE
RT
ES
TS
-
I
—40
~"~ ""
—45
E"—50
—
~ 55 850.0
—
IT65
z_70
^-75
^-80
27/30/33
20/18/23
23/22/20
55
65
15
0
: : ! :
i i; M
1
T' - • : • 12IV • nv 'v !
Leu Silt at 50'
End Boring at 55'
SS
ss
SS
ss
_
-
—
—
—
—
—
£E
—
—
—
=
—
Appendix H
Well Details
-0
-10
-20
-30
-50
-60B'J
Well No. P17C ..Boring No. X-Ref: Ri?r.R
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords: ?31 ,629.9 N Elevation Ground Level Rfi3
Top of Casing 865.31
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth 53 t
Borehole Diameter fl_5"_/4"Casing Stick-up Height: !_&'
Fxploratinn Technology Inc.
Rio CME 75 ______Bit(s) P . -13.R ' ft. Rx4 .PS" HSA
i? R'-f i3 n1 -3-7.8" triconeDrilling Fluid 13.5-63.0' clear water
Protective Casing R ' y _ 4 " fll
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log Geophysical LogCasing String (s) : C = Casing S = Screen.
+1.8 -55.455.4 .61.6
__
_
ClSI
865.3 £07.7807.7 _801.9
_
Casing: C1 ?" Sf.h 80 PVC
C2 _______ __
Screen: si ?" ^rh Rn PVf continuousTl nt.t.pd
S2
Filter Pack: 54 4-fij .6' #30 $J1ir;a canr52.0-54.'4 'fine'slHca'sand '1.0-7.0 granular bentonlte
Grout seal: 7.0-49.5 bentonite slurry
Bentonite Seal: RO 0 hpntnnitp49.5-50.0'f ine silica
Construction Time Log:All dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
Date
-ZA1Time
0430-
1115
i?nn
Date
4/12-Time
1100
1300
1345
Well Development:
Surge and purge 100 gal withkeck submersible pump for 1 hr4R nrin.____________________
Stabilization Test Data:gal.
T-traa.
100
P H7.53
6.806.80
Spec. Cond.
-425-
REJO850880
Temp ( C }
13.5
13.513.5
Recovery Data:Q= 100 gal = 0.4 ft
100
40
TIME ( sec
Comments: natural formation rave-in 61.6-63.0' PVC centralIzerinstalled at bottom of screen
QJ
fDn:
LU
mOLU02>ccLUCLIDCD
Filmed on recycled paper
1870
860
850
-30
BAD
830
Well No. P22BBoring No. X-Ref: B22B
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords: 332 .045 .2
2,218,533.1 £Elevation Ground Level .§?j_t_4_M_Si-
Top of Casing 878.55 MSI
Drilling Summary:
Total DepthBorehole Diameter 8^5"/4"Casing Stick-up Height: 2.2Driller Exploration Technology Inc
TMF 75RigBit(s) 0-7.5' R.5x4.25" HSA
7.5-50.0' .3-7/8" tHrnnPDrilling Fluid 7.5-50,0' rlpar
Protective Casing 8 ' x4 " aluminum
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log _Casing String (s): C = Casing S = Screen.
+2.2 - 42.942.9 _ 49.1
— .__
ClSI
87R.6- 833833.5.827.;
Construction Time Log: a-|i dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
Date7/31
8/1
B/24.
Time1300
1130
1445
Datea/i 1430
8/1
Time
1345
Well Development:
_ Surged w/PVC bailer for 2Qthen pumped 50 gallons w/B-K
Casing: C1 2" Srh 40 PVf.
C2
screen: si "fl
&S'S2
Filter Pack: 37.8-49.1 #30 silica sand3B.7-37.8 finp sand___________
Grout Seal: 7 .0 -33 ft hpntnnitp clurry1.5-7.0* granular bpntonite____
Bentonite Seal: 33.R-3R.7 hpntnnitp________pellets_______
rnnrrpt.p <;pa1
1.7 hand pump.
Stabilization Test Data:
Time1513
1541
P H
6,64ft 71
7n6.70
Spec. Cond.iiqn
1150
Temp | C )
i? nn
.n12.0
Recovery Data:Q=
500
20 60 80 100
TIME ( sec
Comments: Pellet seal thickness shortened due to bridging duringinstallation.
C<u
UJ
b OCO -J
1*-LOT-H
CO
O
mDUJCO>a:UJa
CTiCO
CO
I
cnCO
f)r-^
LU
<D
Printed on recycled paper
-0
-10 •850
1 1
— V-
; = ,:•:
HBo
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTSurvey Coords: 3^1 fiQ£ J N
2,219,301.3 E
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth T 5 . 5Borehole Diameter R 5"Casing Stick-up Heiaht: 2 7Driller PVpl orati nn Tprhnnlngy Tnr. .
Ria DipnVirh D50 on BombadiP-rBitlsl 4 ?R" H<;fl
Drillinq Fluid HOHP
Protective Casing 6 'x4" aluminum
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical LogCasing String ( s ) : C = Casing S = Screen.
Depth String (s) ElevationH2.7 - 3.9 Cl 862.4- 855.;3.9 _ 14.1 SI 855 ,8_845. (
__
Casino: C1 2" SCh 40 PVC
C2
Screen: S1 9" srh 40 PUPn mn11 cinttpH
S2
Filter pack' 3.0-14.1 #30 silica sand2.8-3.0 fine silica sand
Grout Seal: None
Bentonite Seal: 1.0-2.8 Granularhpntonitp
0-1.0' concrete seal
Well Noring No. X-Ref
riON SUMM)Elevation Ground Le
Top of Cas
Construction T
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
. MW-25: B-25
\RYVRI 859.7m, 862.41
me Lost
Date8/15
8/15
8/23
3: Allart
Time1300
1400
1055
datesFir
Date8/15
8/15
8/23
1989ish
Time1400
1430
JL2IS.
Well Development:
^nrgpd ?n min/PVr hflilpr;niimnpH ?R nallnnc w/R-K 1.7
' n aprf pump.
Stabilization Test Data:
Time11201123114411481154
P H7.137.167.157.137.12
Spec. Cond.460460460465465
Temp ( C )14.013.513.013.013.0
Recovery Data:0=25 gal S0= 3>8 ft
% 10°^ 80
c fino 60vER 20Y
0
//
,
20 40 60 80 100
TIME ( sec )
Comments: Grease inside this well detected during development.
ES-fCu,ca
^
LU
UJKU)
N
fO3
*
_l
a:
m
LU
SU
PE
RV
I
Printed on recycled paper (t\)
r-10 850
r 840
-30 830
820
f/jy
I
Well No.Boring No. X-Ref:
P25BB25B
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords: 331 ftN
2,219,289.IEElevation Ground Level
Top of Casing
859.7862.77
Drilling Summary:
42.0Total Depth______Borehole Diameter 8.5 /4Casing Stick-up Height: __3_._! . _ ________Driller_Exploration Technology. Inc.
Rig Diedri'ch D50 on Bombadier0-8'! 8.5" x 4.25" HSA
3 7/8" triconeDrilling Fluid 8-42.0' rlpar water
Protective Casing R ' y 4"
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log Geophysical LogCasing String (s) : C = Casing S = Screen.
+3.0- 34.934. 9_ 41.1
___
ClSI
8 6 2 . 7 - R ? 4 _ f t824.8.818.6
Casing: C1
C2
?" .Srh 40 PVC
Screen: SI 2" Sch 40 PVCcontinuous wrap 5.0'
S2 slotted
Filter Pack: 29.9-42.0 #30 silica sand?R.fi-?9.9 fine silica
Grout seal: 3.0-26.5 bentonlte slurry1.5-3.0 granular bentonite____
Bentonite Seal: ?fi.5-2R.6 hfntnnit.p1
0-1.5 concrete seal
Construction Time Log: all dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
Date
8/15
2/21
Time1330
1530
0910
Date8/15
8/15
8/23
Time1200
1700
1055
Well Development:
Surged 30 min. w/PVC bailerPumped 60 gallons w/B-K 1.7hand pump
Stabilization Test Data:
Time10101013in?n
1042
P H
7.167.207 .47
7.68
Spec. Cond.475480485
485
Temp ( C12.012.012.01112.0
Recovery Data:Q=
100R 80
60
ECOV 40
R 20Y
020
TIME
60 80 100
sec
Comments:
Pfinied on recycled paper (» «J
o<u cenro o31
o
uj o
£ 9
CDLOs-HCD
O
CLLL.tD
>-CD
QUJc/2>rrUJCL:DCO
01CO
COI
co
<D
SBO
870
660
S50
• r
Well No. MW26Boring No. X-Ref: B26
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords:
2,218,117.6 E331,819.7 Elevation Ground Level o"l • •
Top of Casing 883.87
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth 34.0Borehole Diameter 8.5"Casing Stick-up Height: 2.2 'Driller Fxplnratlon Tprhnology Tnr.
Rig CME-75_________Bit(s) 8.5 x 4.25" HSA
Drilling Fluid None
Protective Casing R' X 4" Aluminum
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log __X Geophysical Log _Casing String (s): C = Casing S = Screen.
9 7 - 22.722.1 _ 33.0
___
ClSI
883.9-859.0859.0_848.7
_
Casing: C1 2" ScH 80 PVC
C2
Screen: SI 2" Sch 80 PVCn.010 slotted
S2
Filter Pack: 19.0-34.0 - #30 Silicasand
18.5-19.Q Fine silica sandGrout Seal: 1.0-15.6 bentonite slurry
and granular hentornte_______
Bentonite Seal: 15.6-18.5 bentOHl'tepellets______________
0-1.0' Concrete Seal
Construction Time Log: All dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
Date Time
1230
1510
Date77TT
7/14
Time1030
1345
1240
Well Development:
Purge 7.R gal with Keck submersihip pump - dry, remove 5 galtwice w/PVC bailer, run recoverytest, remove 2 gal. Total 19 galbailed dry 4 times._________
Stabilization Test Data:gal.
7.512.
P H
7.307.32
Spec. Cond.
1250Temp { C
12.. 5
Recovery Data:Q=5 gal S0=6.34
100
BO 100
TIME m i n .
Comments: * pH approximate due to standardization problem.
c:OJCTto
LU
CD
DLU00>orLLJCLr>CO
Printed on recycled paper (» »
-10
-30
-50
[-60
V _...
880
870
860
850
840 _ •
830
820
Well No.Boring No. X-Ref:
P26BB26B
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords: 331.820.8 N
2,218,125.1 EElevation Ground Level
Top of Casing
881.9883.29
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth 68.75Borehole Diameter 8.5 /4Casing Stick-up Height: 1.4Driller Exploration Technology In.
CME-75Bit(s) 0-13.5 8.5 x 4.25" HSA
13.5-68.8 3 7/8" trlconeDrilling Fluid 13.5-68.8 clear water
Protective Casing __jg ' X 4"
Welt Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log _x_ Geophysical Log _Casing String (s ) : C = Casing S = Screen.
Depth+ 1.4'- 42.342.3 48.5
String(s)
SI
Elevation
839.6-R3Q.fi_833.4
Casing: C1 2" Sch 40 PVC
C2 ___ ___
Screen: S1 2" Sch 40 PVCcontinuous wrap 5.0 ' slotte
S2
Filter Pack: 38.0-54.1 #30 silica sand37.1-38.0 fine silica sand____
Grout seal: 7.0-34.9 bentom'te slurry2.0-7.0 granular bentom'te______
Bentonite Seal: 3 f i .4 -37.1 bentom'tp
34.9-35.4 fine sil ica sand0-2.0 Concrete Seal
Construction Time Log: All dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
Date7/13
7/20
TimeQ8QQ
1015
Date Time0930
1400
1120
Well Development:
Surop and ourae 55 gal with Kecksubmersible pump for 1 hr
Stabilization Test Data:gal.
20
.40.50
6.75fi.fi?
6.82
Spec. Cond.
1150114011601150
Temp ( C7T3———12.5
1? 412.4
Recovery Data:Q=55 gal S0= 3.7 ft
100
80
60
RECOV ,o
R 20Y
020 60 80 100
TIME ( sec
Comments: * pH check indicated error In standardization.Restandardized after test - pH = 6.61 @ 55 gal.D r i l l e d ana sampled to bb./b to determine deptn to bedrocK; backtiiiedto 54.1 with bentom'te pellets and cave-in.
OJcr
LU1iut00
LO
mDLUCO>ccLUD.Z>CO
Printed on recycled paper (f «]
-0 -8TO- 1-10 860
-20 850
Well No.Boring No. X-Ref:
MW27
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords: 331.326.9N
2,218,373.7EElevation Ground Level
Top of Casing
870.3872.27
Drilling Summary:
25.0Total Depth _Borehole Diameter 8 . 5Casing Stick-up Height: ?.DDriller £xp1n*"ati'nn Technology IncT
Rig CME-75_______________em.) 8.5" x 4 .25" HSA_____
Drilling Fluid None____________________________
Protective Casing 8' X 4" Aluminum
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log _Casing String ( s ) : C = Casing S = Screen.
+2.0 - 13.413.4 _ 23.4
__—
ClSI
872.3 -856.9856.9 -846.9
_
Casing:C1 2" Sch 40 PVC
C2
Screen: S1 2" Sch 40 PVCQ.Q10 slotted
S2
Filter Pack: 10.9-25.0 #30 silica sand10.0-10.9 fine silica sand
Grout seal: l .Q-6 .5 r a n u l a rhentonlte
Bentonite Seal: 7.0-10.0 bentOnitepellets_____ ______f i . f i-7.f i finp ^ilira0-1.0 concrete seal
Construction Time Log: All dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys.Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
Date
8/23
Time1100
1330,
Time
1500
Well Development;
Surged 20 min. w/PVC bailer;Purged 15 gallons w/PVC bailer
Stabilization Test Data:
Time14401444144S
1457
p H7.317.177.157 1?7.10
Spec. Cond.600600625
625
Temp ( C12.012.011.5
11.5Recovery Data:
Q=10060
60oV ,0
R 20Y
020 60 eo 100
TIME ( sec
Comments: Recovery is very rapid
Printed on recycled paper. (V \v*^/
cQJCT03
LU_><
C/3
T>U-Q.
CD
Qlu
a:UJQ._DCO
-10
r°-30
-50
-860
-850
-840
-830
. -• =
+
\
\
\i
\
1
I MONITCSurvey Coords:
Well NoBoring No. X~Ref
R WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMM>331, 332 2N Flevation Ground Le
2,218,362. 5E
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth 50'Borehole Diameter 8 . 5 "/4 "Casing Stick-uo Height: 2 . 1Driller Fxploration Tprhnnlogy Tnr.
RiaBills) 0-7.5 ' _ . _ . .8.5 x 4. 25" HSA
7.5-50 ' 3 7/8" triconeDrilling Fluid 7
Protective Casing
5-50' clear water
8' x 4" eiluminum
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical LogCasing String (s) :
Depth2 r l - 4 2 . 8
42 .8 .49 .0_^
Casing: C1 2"
C2
Screen: S1 2"
C = Casing S
String(s)ClSI
Sch 40 PVl
Elevation872.0-827.1827.1 _820 .9
Sch 40 PVCcontinuous wrap 5.0 's lot t
52
Filter Pack: 37sand
.9-50' #30 silica
33.0-37.9 fine sil ica/cave-insand and
Grout sea!: 7 .0-33.0 ' bentoniteslurrvl . f i -7.01 granular hentonit.p
Bentonite Sea!: "niilrl nnt install HUPto natural ra\/P-in0-1.5' cone Pd't~ & c o ja 1
Top of Cas
Construction T
TaskDrilling
Geophys.Casing:
Logging:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
P27B: B27B
\RYv*i 869.9inn 872.02
me Lost
Date7/25
l/2fL
8/23
3: Allart
Time1300
1500
13QQ-
datesFir
Date7/26
Z/26_
8^23
1989ish
Time1030
1600
i4?r
Well Development:
Surged 20 min. w/PVC bailer;pumped 55 gallons w/B-K 1.7hand pump
Stabilization Test Data:
Time
133313431357i<an?1403
P H
6.996.826.99fi.qq6.98
Spec. Cond.
710700700?nn700
Temp ( C )12.012.012.0i?.n12.0
'Recovery Data:
Q- s0=0/ 100
iR /
E «° fC fin 4-o 60 fV <0 f~ER 20 —Y
o —
f
20 40 60 60 100
TIME ( sec )
Comments: Recovery is very rapid.
OJen ot-
o
UJ Ot O
CMCD
O
CO
r-CNJ
iLOCsJ
OLi_CL-
CQ
DLJJ
o:UJ UJD. H;r> <CO Q
Printed on recycled paper. (» *v"*y
h-860
.-10•850
Well No. HW28Boring No. X-Ref: B28
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords: 330,985.6
2,218,148.7Elevation Ground Level 862 ,0
TopofCasng 864.76
Drilling Summary:
17,0Total Depth.Borehole Diameter ________Casing Stick-up Height: 2.8
8.5"
Driller Exploration Technology Inc
Rig CME-75____Bit(s) f l .R" x 4" HSA
Drilling Fluid
Protective casino 6' x 4" Aluminum
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log _Casing String (s ) : C = Casing S = Screen.
+2.8 - 3.53.5 _ 15.3
___
ClSI
864.8^58.5858.5_846.7
Casing: C1 2" Sch 40 PVC
C2
Screen: S1 2" Sch 40 PVCcontintinut; wrap 10.0' slntt.p
S2
Filter Pack: 3.4-15.3' #30 silica sane2.8-3 .4 fine silica sand
Grout Seal: none1.0-1.5 ranular bentonit.p
Bentonite Seal: 1.5-2.8 bentom'tepel lets______________0-1.0 concrete seal
Construction Time Log: All dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cement ng:Development:
Date
7/31
Time0700
091b
Date
7/31
Time0900
1000
i2?n
Well Development:
Surged 20 min w/PVC bailer;purged 20 gallons w/B-K 1.7hand pump_______________
Stabilization Test Data:
Time
120012031205
p H7.267.237.25
1214 7.24
Spec. Cond.625625610
600
Temp ( C )
16.516.015.5lfi.015.5
Recovery Data:
80
60
ECOV 40
R 20Y
020
TIME60 80
sec
Comments:
t O
mDLU
crG-=3
Pnmed on recycled paper. (» «)
860
1-10850
-20840
-30830
820
Well No. P28BBoring No. X-Ref: B28B
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords:
2,218,158.2EElevation Ground Level
Top of Casing
861.7863.84
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth 45.0'________________Borehole Diameter 8. 5"/4"_________Casing Stick-up Height: __%_,1_________Driller Exploration Technology Inc
Rio CME-75Bit(S)JX7.5' 8.5" x 4.25" HSA
7 . 5 ' - 4 5 ' 3 7/8" triconeDrilling Fluid 7 . 5 ' -45 ' clear water
Protective Casing JjJ X A" 3 1
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log _Casing String ( s ) : C = Casing S = Screen.
+2.1 - 37.737.7 „ 43.9
___
ClSI
863.8- 824. C824.0. 817. £
Casing: C1 ?" Sf.h 40 PVT
C2
Screen: SI 2" Sch 40 PVCcontinuous wrap 5.0 ' slotl ?
S2
Filter pack: 33.0-43.9 #30 silica sane29.0-33.0 fine silica
sandseal: 7 .0-22.2 bentonite slurry
1.5-7.0 granular bentonitc
Bentonite Seal: 22.2-29.9 bentoniteand natural formation
rn"|0-1.5' concrete seal
Construction Time Log: all dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing:Development:
Date Time
7/28
8/24_
lion
1230
Date Time1130
1400
Well Development:
Surged w/PVC bailer 25 minutes,purged 60 gal lons w/B-K 1.7hand pump.
Stabilization Test Data:
Time11001105110911151119
P H77147.147.067.077.07
Spec. Cond.775775775775775
Temp ( C177011.511.011.012.0
Recovery Data:Q=
80
60oV 40ER 20Y
020
TIME
100
sec
Comments:
mQUJtotrUJo.13CO
<LU O
55 3
Printed on recycled paper. (*
-10
-20
-870
860
850
= .'V= ,-;= ;;= .•;•Q
v . •*.«•"-*• . •
*.-»•"•» . ••m- . ••» •
* .-*"S-*-
Well NoBoring No. X-Ref
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMM)Survey Coords:
2331, 006. 9N Elevation
,217, 571. OE
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth 29'Borehole Diameter 8.5"Casino Stick-up Height: 2 • 6 'Driller Exploration Technoloav Inc.
Rio CME-75Bitisi 8.5 x 4.25" HSA
Drilling Fluid
Protective Casing
Nonp
8' x 4" aluminum
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical LogCasing String ( s } :
Depth+2 .6 -16 .216.2 _ 2 8 . 0
__
Casino: C1 2
C2
C = Casing S
Strinq(s)ClSI
1 Sch 40 P^
= Screen.
Elevation878.2 £59.4859.4 847.6
/C
Screen: S1 ?" Srh 40 PVCrontinnnije; wran Ifl.O'slntt
S2
Filter Pack: 14.3-?8.0 #30 silica sane12. 1-14.1 fine silica
sandGrout Seal: pnnp3 .5 -6 .7 ' qranular bentonite
Bentonite Seal: 8 5-12.4' bsntonitepellets
6.7-8.5 fine si l ica sand0-3.5 concrete seal
Comments: * nH mptpr
MW29B29
\RYGround Level
Top of Cas
Construction T
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Loggng:Casing:
tent, nplletsFilter Placement:Cementing:Development:
ing
875.6878.23
me Lost
Date8/15
azi8/1
8/2
5_S_
g:allart
Time0930
13QQ
0850
datesFir
Date
aas_
8/15azis_mt
1989ish
Time1040
13301130
1000
Well Development: 8/24/89
Surged w/PVC bailer 20 minutes;purged w/PVC bailer for 15qal Ions.
Stabilization Test Data:
TimeflQ?709320937OQ430947
Sfj
Becox.C
% 10°
F 8°
60o\jER 20Y
0
inoperative.
pH*****
Spec. Cond.
^sn540525W^510
ery Data:a=
/20 4
TIME (
so~
Temp ( C )\? Q12.012.01 1 B11.0
0 60 80 100
sec )
cOJa(13
LLJ Q
55 S
03
DLLJCO>trLLJanCO
Pnnled on recycled paper
-870
1-10
•860
-20
•850
-30
•840
•830
-50
•820
-60
Well No.Boring No. X-Ref:
P29B
B29B
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords: 331.001.6N
2,217,575.IEElevation Ground Level
Top of Casing
875.8878.43
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth - rn,,..!__________Borehole Diameter "' J, __________Casing Stick-up Height: *-'1-1
Driiier Expl o ration Technology Inc.'
Rio CME 75Bit(s) 0-301 8?5x4.25" HSA
?n-Ra R1 v/8" triconeDrilling Fluid 30-58.5' clear water
a ' x 4 " aluminumProtective Casing.
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Qeologic Log Geophysical LogCasing String ( s ) : C = Casing S = Screen.
+ 2 . 6 _ 5 0 . 85 0 . 8 _ 5 7 . 0
___
ClSI
878.4 _825.0825.0 _818.8
Casing: Cl
C2
Screen: SI
S2
2" SCH 40 PVC
40 PVCcontinuous wrap 5.0 slot
ilica ScTTT3.8-47.U' r-ine Silica SancT
5 - 3 9 . 3 ' BentoniteGrout Seal:________________Slurry___________
4-5'' granular ben torn'teBentonite Seal: 41.8-44.8 Bentom'tePellets39.3-41.R' Fine Si 1 ica_Sand_0-4' Concrete Seal
Construction Time Log: All dates 198$Start Finish
TaskDrillinglast watersample___
Geophys. Logging:Casing: . .weir inst.
bentoniteFilter Placement:Cementing:Development:
8/15
8/15
Time11001550
1450
16001510
0710
TimeT55C)1100
tsttr
16401600
0850
Well Development: 8-24-89
Surged 20 min w/PVC bailer;Purged 60 gallons w/B-K1.7 Hand Pump
Stabilization Test Data:
Time08D70812082608330838
P H Spec. Cond.bbO
660650650660
Temp ( C )11.5HJL11.511 .n11.5
Recovery Data:
100
20
TIME40 60
( (Sec) )eo
Comments: *pH Meter Inoperative.
LJJ
1 Q* 5t 8CO -J
CD
QLLJ
CCUJCL
Primed on recycled paper. ML*)
<
£-t-T>T
-fDT
D
O
roCO
COCD
DJc-t-fD-sSDJfD-s
fD
ro
mcr
NfDQ.
O
ITDJ
rooro
o-sfDf"D13
01croro
Com
ments:
^
ro
t/>CT
roQ.
roi— «CO
o
ro
COCD
s:ro
•ac
fDQ.
O
S
cn~
oiroo
no3n-sror+fD
10fDCD
H
3
c
r»>
™
^
aro
fD
1/1
<
CD(D
O3
Mt>ai
cn
30PN>
crrort-o3
•+tl
33
\>o
m*c
roOcn
ro
JD-sDJnc:DJ-5
crfDito
nite
<o
DocC/)<0
13OZ3ro
oJl3
ccIN,
1CC
IN.
13fD
trt
_j— iOOJ
13D-
mOJO
t/)
ODJ
a>Zfa
cc
--N
Tl
D
1 M;*r ro
CD
roroCO
COo
1
33<D
3 0O <
C
s
COo
II
ro
ID
/i
D
D3D
3-
•o
OCDCD
V)
ro
TJ
CD
^ro
cno
cn
nD
-J
^
jnD
n
Oro
Ji
-J
-O
JlN5
Jl
J'
=
^j
JO
J1Tl
DO
O0)2.oO
ro
COo
-p*o-ao
i— >o
^J1— >
cncnO
*
-rt
o
w
o
Oo
H
3T3
O
—
1
1
S
1
1
CO
o;N0)
o
-1m(A
n
i
i
yci»-Cl
c
c1-
cc• ,
4
CJcc
?— '
Dr+DJ
ZJ
1 — '
rr-s
n3
D
D
«l
D
n
o-•
on-j^0^no
s:
fDO
(/>Ccr3ro
2aro
c3T3
NJ
-O
1-oo
-)— fc
DOT>njj3DJi^1
^
O
roo
a»<7>
-!
fD
^CL
O
arocnCO
Qpi
^
o0)M
D oa co2. ^3" 3"<a
O(O »=t O=• (uJ w2. 5"*~*
= Screen.
Elevation
-o <
1 «nfD c
cn «
0 E- 1£ n-D =<CO
crDJ
ro~sr+O
! B
asis: Geologic Lc
toX
DCDOTJ3"
MOSL|-o(O
"
3
"
t-
s(D
O(t>wca"3
C»CO•a(Do-*»o'to
5"30>
DTlC3D
33
DO-*.33
i— injj•")
GO
CO
i— >
i — >cn
Protective C
asino
CO
X•tu
Cu
C33c3
Cem
en
3'
21CD
T>CUO
3CD
1—
t—(,-ic~,
^t—
t—p"
cc
o5"O
•nza
oro
cn
CO
cnX
-p*rocn
LO
31
m
cn
Ou5.in
OCDO•DIT
M
Ooa3a
D
S"
mXT3
O-sDJ<-*•— j.O3
— 1rooIT3O
OUD<<
»— <13n
' • •
o[U
<a
o"ic
T3
TCDo"J
IN;
Borehole Diam
eteo:(j
o
ib
IN:i— i
i—c~c~
^IN1— I
t— 1INCG
00o
II 11 11 II II II II- . .- .. .- .. .' ..
Drilling S
umrra
Total D
epth^
rocnO
2 S* «
-tc£o'3
H
o 3
* « 0
3 " 5a ^
Q.O DJ
» 3! R• S" p _ i
»* CD3 CO
|| III
roroCOV
cnO-P>i—1
n
-to
oOtu
uQ
CO0*1
nocri
saIB
Survey Coords:
COt— •
cnoCO
mCD
uo"
Ooc3
(-
D_
COrncn-C*
^MM
ON
ITC
33
mi-i-
bo
CONSTRUC
-i 2o S* 20) PC XS JS 5> ^33-<
coc
-
m
^0
3 3J £3 CO
O
SUPERVISED BY R S L>
DATE
SITE NAME Hagen Farm
7/21-23/89 WC 6161 LOCATIONTown of Dunkirk, WI
-o
-10
-20
-30
•860
•850
-840
•830
V,:
=—
• =
\%
\i\1
•
MONITCSurvey Coords:
2,218,6
Well NoBoring No. X-Ref
)R WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMM)ojl,44b.£ N Elevation Ground Le
09.8 E
Drilling Summary:
46.4Total DepthBorehole Diameter 8.5"/4"Casino Stick-UD Helaht: 1 • b
Driller Exploration Technology inc.
RiaBit(s) U-2b'8 A b"X4 .Zb ' HbA
37/8" triconeDriiiina Fluid 25-46.4' clear water
Protective Casing,8 /.4 al uni i iiuin
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geoloqic Loq x Geophysical LogCasing String (s) :
Depth+1.6 _ 38.8
__
Casino: C1
C2
C = Casing S
String (s)ClSI
2" SCH 40
= Screen.
Elevation868.0 -827.6327.6 _821.4
PVC
Screen: S1 2" SCH 40 PVCcontinous wrap 5.0 ' slotte
S2
Filter Pack:34. 3-46. 4' #30silica sand31.9-34.3 fine sil ica sand
Grout seal: 6.0-31.9' bentoniteslurry1.0-6.0' granular bentonite
Bentonite Seal: COuld not install dueto natural cave-in
0-1.0' concrete seal
Top of Cas
Construction T
TaskDrilling
Geophys. Logging:Casing:
Filter Placement:Cementing;Development:
PJUb
B30B
\RY866.4867.96
me Lo<st
Date7/21
122L.
3: Allart
Time1400
0830
"USD"
datesFir
Date
7/25
8/8
1989ish
Time0800
0930
IbOO
Well Development:
surge and purge 63 gal with kecksubmersible pump
Stabilization Test Data:gal
Timeb
10305u60
pH7.607.28Z.29
'. JU
.JU
Spec. Cond.490540550
550
Temp ( C )13. b12.5131313
Recovery Data:Q=63 S0=0.5 ft
n 1°° \T
Mlo 6 0 f fv «lR 20 LY
0 L
20 40 60 80 100
TIME ( fN.\(,r\ )
Comments:
OJC7103
UJ
Ioo
UJ
CDDLJJCO>rrLLJD.z>CO
-10
-20
-30
-890
880
-870
•860
-50
-850
Well No.Boring No. X-Ref:
MW31B31
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYSurvey Coords: 333,343.5
2.218.328.1Elevation Ground Level
Top of Casing
905.0907.68
Drilling Summary:
Total Depth 55.0 'Borehole Diameter _ftCasing Stick-up Height: _Driller Exploration Technology Inc
RIO Diedrich D50 on BombadierBit isiO- 20' 8.5" x 4.25" HSA
20-55 ' : 3 7/8" triconeDrilling Fluid _20-55_L clear water
protective casing 8'x4" aluminum
Well Design & Specifications
Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log _Casing String (s) ; C = Casing S = Screen.
+2.7- 35.735.7- 53.1
__-
ClSI
907.7_ 869.:869.3. 851. <
.
Casing: C1 2" SCH 40 PVC
C2
Screen: SI 2" SCH 40 PVCContinuous wrap 15' slottec
S2
Filter Pack: 32.1-55.0 #30si l ica sand29.5-32.1' Fine Silica Sand
Grout seal: 3 .0-25.7 Bentoniteslurry2 .5 -3 .0 ' granular bentonite
Bentonite Seal: 26 .3 -29 .5 ' bentonite
fine <:anH
Or2 .5 concrete seal
Construction Time Log: All dates 1989Start Finish
TaskDrilling
Geophys. LoggingCasing:
BentoniteFiller Placement:Cementing:Development:
Date Time
08400815
1310
Date
8/18
Time0715
08550840
1430
Well Development: 8/24/89
surge w/PVC bailer for 20 min.then purged 20 gallons w/PVChailer
Stabilization Test Data:
Time13331343
14081420
P H7.487.777. ftp
7.76
Spec. Cond.450525
525
Temp ( C12.512.012.012.012.0
Recovery Data:Q=
100
80
%REC 60OV ,0ER 20Y
020
TIME100
( SEC )
Comments: Installed 15' screen due to uncertanty in water level
CQ
QUJCO>CCUJD.=)CO
UJ
< I^ 5UJ ot o
Printed on recycled paper [ 9 .«)
Appendix I
Sundby Production Well Information and Computer Simulations
• Suite o f Wisconsin \ D E P A R T M E N T O F N A T U R A L R E S O U R C E SAnthony S. East
Sscrmtary
BOX 7921September 22, 1980 MADISON. W.SCONS.N M707
IN REPLY REFER TO- 3320
REPORT ON EXAMINATION OF APPLICATIONBELATED APPROVAL TO CONTINUE OPERATION OF
TWO HIGH CAPACITY INDUSTRIAL WELLSSUNBY SAND AND GRAVEL "COMPANY
STOUGHTON, WISCONSIN
There is submitted herewith a report on a review of an application forapproval to continue operation of 2 existing high capacity industrialwells located on property 1n the Town of Dunkirk, Dane County> nearStoughton, Wisconsin.
• GENERAL INFORMATION
Owner of Property & Well: Sunby Sand and Gravel CompanyStoughton, WI 53589
Officials: President - Richard SunbySecretary - Greg Sunby
Location: The property and wells are located in the SE 1/4 of the SW1/4 south of County Trunk A; T5M, RUE, Town of Dunkirk, Dane County.
Existing Water Supply: The existing water supply consists of 2 highcapacity industrial wells and one low capacity driven point well hereindescribed. * . •
The 2 wells were constructed without an approval in violation of Chapter144, Statutes.
f Vie 11 iQs reported to have been constructed in about 1965. by the POTO"Corporation. A 36 inch diameter drillhole was constructed to the 66foot depth 1n sand and gravel. Fifty-eight feet of 22 inch diameter,
~"73<FlnCh thick wall steel well casing and 8 feet of 22 inch diameterwell screen was then set to the 66 foot depth. The well casing terminatesabout 14 Inches above the ground surface. The annular space was reportedto have been sealed with pea gravel from the 66 foot depth to the surface.It 1s reported that the annular space surrounding the well casingsubsides gradually. Pea gravel' is periodically added to f i l l the annularspace. We would suggest that clay slurry shall be added to f i l l theannular space In the future. The slurry should be added during pumpshutdown to allow the slurry to set up.
THIS IS 1001 RECYCLED PAPER
A 200 gallon per minute submersible pump is installed in the well. The'4 Inch diameter well pump discharge pipe extends upward through a 2-piecemetal plate. The plate is held open about 6 inches on one side of thecasing by a short section of I-beam welded to the side of the casing andthe plate. A 4 inch by 6 inch plank with an opening in the center isset over the plate and casing and the 4 inch discharge pipe extendsthrough the plank. A 4 inch coupling on the discharge pipe rests on topof the plank. The discharge pipe extends upward above ground about 10feet and then extends horizontally about 80 feet to a manifold connectedto 1 1/2 Inch diameter spray bars at the wash plant. The pipe is supportedby 4 inch bars spaced intermittently. The well pump is operated manuallyand the pump electric cable merely passes through the opening in thesteel plate.
An approved one-piece well seal should be* installed in the well. Thewell pump electrical wires shall egress from the well through a sealedwatertight conduit extending underground or to the control box. An air-line with altitude gauge should be installed in the well to measurewater levels and should be sealed watertight. An hour meter should beinstalled to record total puropage.
_IZ/1s reported to have been constructed in about ]95Q.by BurtnessWell Drilling. Eight Inch diameter .250 inch-thick wall steel well
.casing Is reported to extend to th»_75 fr*°t ^p** *n ***** an^ qrfiYft1
The well casing terminates about 12 Inches above the concrete floor ofa pumphouse.
A 40 gallon per minute submersible pump 1s Installed in the well. The1 1/4 Inch diameter well pump discharge pipe extends vertically to apipe tee located about 8-10 Inches above the top of the open wellcasing. The discharge pipe 1s clamped with 2 blocks of wood setting onthe casing, .The run of the pipe tee 1s sealed with a threaded plug.The branch of the pipe tee extends to about a 200 gallon in-line galvanizedpressure tank. The well pump 1s controlled by a pressure switch. on thepressure tank. A check valve 1s Installed prior to the pressure tank.The service pipe extends below ground about 50 feet to the batch plant.The water 1s used for concrete-mixing only. Any chemicals or additivesused in the concrete-mixing process are not added into the well waterdistribution system. A line also extends about 100 feet from the batchplant to the main building. This line is capped off upon entry Into themain building.
The pumphouse 1s constructed of a concrete floor, Insulated wood wallsand woo* celling.
About 4 T foot deep pit 1s located beneath the pumphouse. This pitshould bt filled with a native clay. About a 15 Inch diameter holesurrounds the casing and a 6 Inch diameter hole exists in the floor.These holes should be sealed with concrete.
'An approved well seal should be installed in the well . The well pumpelectrical wires should egress from the well through a sealed watertightconduit extending to the control box in the pumphouse. An air-line withaltitude gauge and hour meter will not be required for well 92.
A sign shall be posted at each well site indicating that water from thewell should not be used for human consumption or for the washing orpreparation of food products.
The wash water discharges to a series of holding ponds located about 30feet from the wells. The water eventually discharges into the backwaters of a small pond. The discharge is monitored under a WPOES permitfrom the Department.
A third well Is constructed In the main building. It is arrive Pointreported.to be .constructed prior to 1950 to an unknown depth. It islocated in a small watertight concrete floor and cement block wall wellpit beneath the concrete floor of the main building. A 2 foot squareopening with a concrete cap with a 6 inch diameter metal cover over aninspection point is improperly provided for the pit. The access manholeshould be curbed and have an overlapping cover. A pump is directlyconnected to the drive point. The well pump discharge pipe extendsalong the wall to a pressure tank located on top of the restroom ceilinginside the main building. A sampling faucet is not installed prior tothe pressure tank. One should be installed. The service pipe extendsto a toilet and wash basin in the bathroom.
The drive point is located more than 100 feet from buried fuel tanks anda drain field and wore than the minimum separating distance from theseptic tank and sanitary sewer.
Water Consumption: It is estimated that water is used for sand andgravel-washing purposes from well #1 at a rate of about 67,000 gallonsper.day on normal days of use and at a rate of about 80,000 gallons perday on maximum days of use during the period of April through November,and that water is used for concrete mixing from well 12 at a rate ofabout 2500-4000 gallons per day year round. The drive point providesvery little water.
Public Utility Well: The nearest well serving a public utility islocated in Stoughton, approximately 1 1/2 miles northwest of the existingwell sites. Also, the nearest private well on neighboring property is.located about 2000 feet northwest of the existing well sites.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The operation of the high capacity industrial wells has not caused areported reduction in ground water availability to the nearest publicutility well. Therefore, It is recommended that the continued operationof the wells at the planned rate be approved subject to the followingconditions: . " . •
1. That water use shall not exceed that specified in the application asbeing necessary.
2. That a sign shall be posted at each industrial well site indicatingthat water from the well shall not be used for human consumption or forthe washing or preparation of food products and sha l l be ma in t a ined in alegible condition.
3. That an approved well seal (only a one-piece seal for wel l ?1 ) sha l lbe installed in each industrial we l l .
4. That a pump operating timing device and an air l ine with a l t i tudegauge shall be installed and sealed watert ight in well II mainta ined ingood operating condition.
5. That the corporate officials understand that should the operation ofthe industrial wells affect any private wells on neighboring properties,the Department approval wil l not negate the protection to which privatewell owners are entitled under Wisconsin case law relating to groundwater.
6. That prior approval shall be obtained for any future well construction,reconstruction or increase 1n pumpage.
7. That reports of static water levels, pumping well water levels, andtotal pumpage shall be made to the Division on the first of each monthon forms provided by the Division.
8. That the pit for well 12 shall be filled with a native clay and thatthe reported holes In the concrete floor of the pumhouse shall be sealedwith concrete. .
9. That a sampling faucet shall be installed between the well pumpand pressure tank for the drive point well.
10. That a concrete curbing and overlapping cover shall be providedfor the pit for well 13.
Respectfully submitted,
Eric ImhofPrivate '
Approved
Private Water Supply Section
Charles W. GoethelPrivate Water Supply Section
E I t k hDistrict
X
WALTCN - B8
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY (GP0/FT)- 800AQUIFER STORATIVITY (DIH)» .075MO. OF COLUMNS* 9WO. OF ROWS* i3GRID SPACING (FT) = 100WO. OF UELLS- 1XWELL (FT)- 100YWELL (FT)- 100WELL DISCHARGE (GPM)= 2TIKEtDAY)* 150DRAWDOWNS AT OB WELLS (FT):
3,75 1.11 0.73 0.51 0.37 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.10
1,11 0.92 0.66 0.48 0.35 0.26 0.19 0.13 0.10
0,73 0,66 0.54 0.42 0.31 0.23 0.17 0.13 0.09
0.51 0.48 0.42 0.34 0.27 0.20 0.15 0.11 0.08
0.37 0.35 0.31 0.27 0.21 0.17 0.13 0.10 0.07
0.27 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.06
0.19 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05
0.14 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04
0.10 O.iO 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03
0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02
0.05 0.$» 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02
0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 O.C1
0.01 0.01 0.01 O.Oi 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
WALTGN - B8
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY <GPD/FT)» 16000AQUIFER STORATIVITY <DIK)» .075NO. OF COtttflNS* 9NO. OF R0«8« 15GRID SPACING (FT)= 100NO. OF WELLS* 1XUELL (FT)» 100YWE1.L (FT)- 100WELL DISCHARGE (GPM)« 2TINE(DAY)= 150DRAWDOWNS AT OB WELLS (FT)i
0.23 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04
0.10 0.09 0.03 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0,04
0.08 0,08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04
0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04
0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0,04 0.04 Q.04 0.03
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03
0.04 0.04 0,04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03
0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 O.OJ 0.03
0.04 0*04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03'''i'V•&+
0.03 "*V.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Q.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02
0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 0.02
WALTON - B8
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY (GPD/FT)= 800AGUIFER STORATIVITY (DIH>- .075WO. OF COLUMNS* 9WO. OF ROWS* 15GRID SPACING (FT)= 100WO. OF WELL'S- 1XWELL (FT)- 100YWELL (FT)* 100iJELL DISCHARGE (GPM)= 2TIKE(DAY>= 1000DRAWDOWNS AT OB WELLS (FT):
•4,29 1.65 1.26 1.03 0.87 0.74 0.64 0.56 C.49
1.65 1.46 1.19 1.00 0.85 0.73 0.64 0.56 0.49
1.26 1.19 1.06 0.92 O.SO 0.70 0.62 0,54 0.43
1.03 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.74 0.66 0.53 0.52 0.46
0.87 0.85 0.80 0.74 0.68 0.61 0.55 0.49 0.44
0.74 0.73 0.70 0.66 0.61 0.56 0.50 0.46 0.41
0.64 0.64 0.62 0.58 0.55 0,50 0,45 0.42 0.38
0.56 0.56 0.54 0.52 0.49 0.46 0.42 0.39 0.35
0.49 0.49 0.4S 0.46 0.44 0.41 0.3S 0.35 0.32
0.43 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.34 0.32 0.30
0.38 -0.38 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.33 0,31 0.29 0.27
0.34 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.28 0,26 0.24
0.30 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.23 0-22
0,26 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.20
0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0,18
WALTQN - B8
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY (GPD/FT)* 16000AQUIFER STORATIVITY (Dirt)- .075NO. OF CQtUHNS* 9NiO,, OF RO»S= 15GRID SPACING (FT)= 100NO. OF WELLS* 1XWELL (FT)« 100YWELL (FT) = 100WELL DISCHARGE (GPU)* 2TIME(DAY)- 1000DRAWDOWNS AT OB WELLS (FT)a
0.26 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.08 0,07 0.07 0.07
0.13 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07
0.11 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0-08 O.QV 0.07 0.07
0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06
0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06
Q.OB 0.03 0.08 O.Q8 0.07 0.07 0.07 QUQ6 O.C6
0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.0,5
0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05
0,06" 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05
0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.03
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0,05
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
WALTGN - B8
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY <GPD/FT)» 800AQUIFER STORATIVITY (DI!1)« .075NO. OF CQW»WS= 9MO. OF ROWS- 15GRID SPACING (FT)* 100NO. OF WELLS- 1XWELL CFT) = 100YWELL (FT)« 100WELL DISCHARGE (OPM)» 56TlnE(DAY)= 240DRAWDOWNS AT OB WELLS (FT)a
108,72 34.89 23.94 17.72 13.50 10.41 S.Q6 6.25 4.32
34.89 29.39 22.21 16.94 13.07 10.13 7.90 6.13 4.75
23.94 22.21 18.61 15.00 11.93 9.43 7.42 5.81 4.52
17.72 16.94 15.00 12.67 10.41 8.42 6.73 5.33 4,18
13.50 13.07 11.93 10.41 8.30 7.28 5.92 4.75 3.76
10.41 10.15 9.43 8.42 7,28 6.13 S.07 4.12 3.30
8,06 7.90 7.42 6.73 5.92 5.07 4.25 3.50 2.33
6.25 6.13 5.81 5.33 4.75 4.12 3.50 2.91 2.38
4,82 4.75 4.52 4.13 3.76 3.30 2.33 2.38 J.96
3.71 ,3.65 3.50 3.25 2.95 2.61 2.26 1.92 1.59.-v ''"**;•*!*
2.83 P*9 2.68 2.51 2.29 2.04 1.78 1.52 1.27
2.15 2.12 2.04 1.92 1.76 1.58 1.38 1.19 1.00
1.61 1.59 1.54 1.45 1.34 l.iO 1.06 0,92 0.73
1.20 1.19 1.15 1.09 1.00 0.91 0.81 0.70 0.60
0.39 0.88 0.85 0.81 0.75 0.6& 0.60 0.53 0.45
WALTON - B8
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY (GPD/FT).- 16000AQUIFER STORATIVITY (DIM)- .075NO. OF COLUMNS= 9NO. OF ROWS* 15GRID SPACING <FT) = 100NO. OF WELLS* 1XUELL (FT)- 100YWELL (FT)* 100WELL DISCHARGE (GPM)- 56TIKE(DAY)= 240DRAWDOWNS AT OB WELLS (FT):
6.64 2.94 2.39 2.06 1.83 1.66 1.51 1.39 1.28
2.94 2.67 2.30 2.02 1.81 1.64 1.50 1.33 1.28
2.39 2.30 2.11 1.92 1.74 1.60 1.47 1.36 1.26
2.06 2.02 1.92 1.79 1.66 1.53 1.42 1.32 1.23
1.83 1.81 1.74 1.66 1.56 1.46 1.37 1.28 1.20
1.66 1.64 1.60 1.53 1.46 1.38 1.30 - 1.23 1.16
1.51 1.50 1.47 1.42 1.37 1.30 1.24 1,17 1.11
1.39 1.33 1.36 1.32 1.28 1.23 1.17 1.12 1.06
1.28 1.28 1.26 1.23 1.20 1.16 1.11 1.06 1.02
1.1? 1.19 1.17 1.19 1.12 1.09 1.05 1.01 0.77
1.11 ' 1,11 1.10 l.OS 1.05 1.02 0.99 0.96 0.92
1.04 1.03 1.02 1.01 0.99 0.97 0.94 0,?1 0.38
0.97 0.97 0.96 0.99 0.93 0.91 0.89 0-86 0.83
0.91 0.91 0.90 0.89 0.88 0.86 0,84 0.81 0.79
0.85 0.65 0.85 0.64 0.33 0.31 0.79 0.77 0.75
