Upload
anthalya
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/15/2019 w16_206_hwk05_solns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/w16206hwk05solns 1/5
Math 206, Spring 2016 Assignment 5 – Solutions Due: February 26, 2016
Part A.
(1) Let
w1 =
11
, w2 =
−1
2
, and w3 =
10
.
Prove that there cannot be T ∈ L(R2,R3) that satisfies
T (w1) =
1
23
, T (w2) =
3
−25
, and T (w3) =
4
17
.
[Hint: Find two distinct ways to express 0 ∈ R2 as a linear combination of w1, w2 and w3. If you
assume that T is linear, what do these two representations for 0 tell you about the value of T (0)?]
Solution. Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that such a linear transformation T exists. Observethat 0 = 0w1 + 0w2 + 0w3, but also that
0 = 2
11
−
−1
2
− 3
10
= 2w1 − w2 − 3w3.
Now the linearity of T tells us that, on the one hand,
T (0) = T (0w1 + 0w2 + 0w3) = 0
1
23
+ 0
3
−25
+ 0
4
17
=
0
00
.
On the other hand, linearity of T gives
T (0) = T (2w1 − w2 − 3w3) = 2
123
− 1
3−2
5
− 3
417
=
−133
−20
.
Hence our assumption leads to the conclusion that T (0) takes two separate values; but this contradictsthe fact that T is a function. So our initial assumption must be false, and we conclude that there is noT ∈ L(R2,R3) that satisfies the given properties.
(2) Suppose that T ∈ L(Rc,Rr) is given. Prove that im(T ) satisfies the following properties:(a) The vector 0 ∈ R
r is an element of im(T ).
Solution. There are a few ways one could approach this. Here’s one: since T ∈ L(Rc,Rr), thereexists some A ∈ R
r×c so that for all x ∈ Rc we have T (x) = Ax. Hence
T (0
) = A0
= 0Col1(A) + 0Col2(A) + · · · + 0Colc(A) = 0
.Hence 0 ∈ R
r.
Here’s a different proof. We know that for any n ∈ Z+ and any x ∈ R
n, we have 0x = 0. Henceby linearity we have
T (0) = T (0x) = 0T (x) = 0
(where the initial 0 we plugged into T is an element of Rc, and the latter 0 is an element of Rr).
http://palmer.wellesley.edu/~aschultz/w16/math206 Page 1 of 5
8/15/2019 w16_206_hwk05_solns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/w16206hwk05solns 2/5
Math 206, Spring 2016 Assignment 5 – Solutions Due: February 26, 2016
(b) If v, w ∈ im(T ), then v + w ∈ im(T ).
Solution. Let v, w ∈ im(T ) be given. This means that there exist vectors x1, x2 ∈ Rc so that
T (x1) = v and T (x2) = w. But then observe that
T (x1 + x2) = T (x1) + T (x2) (linearity of T )
= v + w.
Hence v + w ∈ im(T ), since it is the output of the vector x1 + x2Rc.
(c) If v ∈ im(T ) and c ∈ R, then cv ∈ im(T ).
Solution. Let v ∈ im(T ) and c ∈ R be given. By the definition of image, this means that thereexists some x ∈ R
c so that T (x) = v. Note that we therefore have
T (cx) = cT (x) (linearity of T )
= cv
.
Hence cv ∈ im(T ), since it is the output associated to the vector cx ∈ Rc.
(3) For each of the following functions, determine (with proof) if the function is linear. If so, give the matrixto which it corresponds.
(a) The function T : R3 → R2 defined by T
x
yz
=
3x + yx + y − 2z
Solution. We’ll check that T is linear.
First, let
x =
x1
x2
x3
and w =
w1
w2
w3
be given. We then have
T (v + w) = T
x1 + w1
x2 + w2
x3 + w3
(definition of vector addition)
=
3(x1 + w1) + (x2 + w2)
(x1 + w1) + (x2 + w2) − 2(x3 + w3)
(definition of T )
=
3x1 + x2
x1 + x2 − 2x3
+
3w1 + w2
w1 + w2 − 2w3
(definition of vector addition)
= T
x1
x2
x3
+ T
w1
w2
w3
(definition of T )
= T (x) + T (w).
This verifies the first property of linearity.
http://palmer.wellesley.edu/~aschultz/w16/math206 Page 2 of 5
8/15/2019 w16_206_hwk05_solns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/w16206hwk05solns 3/5
Math 206, Spring 2016 Assignment 5 – Solutions Due: February 26, 2016
For the second, let
x =
x1
x2
x3
and c ∈ R
be given. Then we have
T (cx) = T
cx1
cx2
cx3
(definition of scaling)
=
3(cx1) + (cx2)
(cx1) + (cx2) − 2(cx3)
(definition of T )
= c
3x1 + x2
x1 + x2 − 2x3
(definition of scaling)
= cT (x).
This verifies the second property of linearity.
Now that we know T is linear, we can compute the matrix to which it corresponds. By a theoremfrom class, we know this matrix is
T (e1) · · · T (ec)
=
3 1 01 1 −2
.
(b) The function T : R2 → R3 defined by T
xy
=
x
1y
Solution. This is not linear. Note that
T
00
=
0
10
.
Of course we know that for 0 ∈ R2 we have 0 + 0 = 0, but observe that
T (0 + 0) = T (0) =
0
10
whereas
T (0) + T (0) = 01
0
+ 01
0
= 02
0
.
Since T (0 + 0) = T (0) + T (0), we see that T fails to be linear.
Part B.
(a) Let v =
1
−22
, and for a given w ∈ R
3 define w⊥ = w − proj
vw.
http://palmer.wellesley.edu/~aschultz/w16/math206 Page 3 of 5
8/15/2019 w16_206_hwk05_solns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/w16206hwk05solns 4/5
Math 206, Spring 2016 Assignment 5 – Solutions Due: February 26, 2016
(i) Prove that w⊥ is orthogonal to v.
Solution. We will show that w⊥ · v = 0. To help in this calculation, recall that proj
vw =
w·v
v·vv
. Hence we getw⊥ · v =
w −
w · v
v · v v
· v
= w · v − w · v
v · v v · v (linearity of dot product)
= w · v − w · v (cancellation of v · v)
= 0.
(ii) Prove that the function T : R3 → R3 given by T (w) = w
⊥ is a linear transformation.
Solution.
We will check the relevant axioms. First, suppose that w
1 and w
2 are given inR3. Then we have
T (w1 + w2) = (w1 + w2) − projv
(w1 + w2) (definition of T )
= (w1 + w2) − projv
w1 − projv
w2 (linearity of proj from class)
= (w1 − projv
w1) + (w2 − projv
w2 commutativity of vector addition)
= T (w1) + T (w2).
This verifies the first condition of linearity.
For the second, let w ∈ R3 and c ∈ R be given. Then we have
T (cw) = (cw) − projv
(cw)(definition of T )
= cw − cprojv
w (linearity of proj from class)
= c(w − projv
w) (scaling distributes across addition)
= cT (w) (definition of T ).
This verifies the second condition of linearity.
(iii) Compute the matrix that corresponds to T .
Solution. By a theorem from class, we know this matrix is T (e1) · · · T (ec)
=
e1 − e1·v
v·vv e2 − e2·v
v·vv e3 − e3·v
v·vv
=
8/9 2/9 −2/9
2/9 5/9 4/9−2/9 4/9 5/9
.
(iv) Is T injective?
Solution. We’ll compute the reduced row echelon form of the matrix associated to T : 1 0 −1/2
0 1 10 0 0
.
(You can reach this form by performing the following sequence of operations: 9
8ρ1, −2
9ρ1 +
ρ2, 29
ρ1 + ρ3, 2ρ2, −1
2ρ2 + ρ3, −1
4ρ2 + ρ1.) Note that this matrix has rank 2. By a theorem
http://palmer.wellesley.edu/~aschultz/w16/math206 Page 4 of 5
8/15/2019 w16_206_hwk05_solns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/w16206hwk05solns 5/5
Math 206, Spring 2016 Assignment 5 – Solutions Due: February 26, 2016
from class, since the rank is less than the number of columns, we have that T is not injective.
(b) Suppose that v ∈ span {w1, w2, · · · , wk}. Prove that
span {w1, w2, · · · , wk} = span {w1, w2, · · · , wk, v} .
Solution. We’ll prove this result using a dual containment argument. First, we argue that{w1, w2, · · · , wk} ⊆ span {w1, w2, · · · , wk, v}. So let z ∈ {w1, w2, · · · , wk} be given; our goal isto show that z ∈ span {w1, w2, · · · , wk, v}. By definition of span, our hypothesis tells us that z isa linear combination of the vectors w1, · · · , wk. This means that there exist d1, · · · , dk ∈ R so that
z = d1w1 + · · · + dkwk.
But observe that then we also have
z = d1w1 + · · · + dkwk + 0 = d1w1 + · · · + dkwk + 0v.
Hence we have exhibited z as a linear combination of the vectors w1, · · · , wk, v. Therefore z ∈span {w1, · · · , wk, v}. This verifies the first containment.
For the containment span {w1, w2, · · · , wk, v} ⊆ {w1, w2, · · · , wk}, suppose that z ∈ span {w1, · · · , wk, v
This means that z is a linear combination of w1, · · · , wk, v, and hence (by definition of linear com-bination) there exist d1, · · · , dk, dk+1 ∈ R so that
z = d1w1 + · · · + dkwk + dk+1v.
Furthermore, we’re told that v ∈ span {w1, · · · , wk}. Hence v is a linear combination of w1, · · · , wk,and so there are real numbers c1, · · · , ck satisfying
v = c1w1 + · · · + ckwk.
We plug this expression for v into our expression for z above to find
z = d1w1 + · · · + dkwk + dk+1v
= d1w
1 + · · · + dkw
k + dk+1(c1w
1 + · · · + ckw
k)= (d1 + dk+1c1)w1 + · · · + (dk + dk+1ck)wk.
Now since each of the di and ci are real numbers, each coefficient di + dk+1ci above is a realnumber. So we have exhibited z as a linear combination of w1, · · · , wk. Therefore we have z ∈span {w1, · · · , wk}. This verifies the second containment.
http://palmer.wellesley.edu/~aschultz/w16/math206 Page 5 of 5