Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vulnerable Plaque
Erling Falk, Denmark
Potential Targets forImaging of Vulnerable Plaques
EHJ 2004;25:1077-82
Santorini declaration
Schaar et al. Eur Heart J, June 2004
Development of atherosclerosis and progression to thrombosis and clinical events
Schaar et al. Eur Heart J, June 2004
Thrombosis-proneplaque
Development of atherosclerosis and progression to thrombosis and clinical events
Plaque Rupture → Coronary Thrombosis
men ~~80%80%women ~60%~60%
Plaquerupture
Thrombosis-prone = high-risk = vulnerable plaque
Ruptured
Non-ruptured
Fatal Coronary ThrombiPrecipitated by Plaque Rupture
Total AMI + SCD 1,460 1,114 = 76% Worldwide
Falk. JACC 2006;47:C7-12
Coronary Thrombosisplaque ruptureplaque rupture• men ~80%• women ~60%
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Ruptured
Intactlumen
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑
Ruptured
Intactlumen
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
corecore
lumen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
FibrosisNecrotic CoreCalcium
Gertz SD, Roberts WC. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:1368-72
% of plaque area
Intact Ruptured
Coronary Plaque Rupturenecrotic core in intact necrotic core in intact (stenotic)(stenotic) vs ruptured plaquesvs ruptured plaques
32%
12%
Heart 2004;90:1385-91
(stenotic)
Mean (SD)
Heart 2004;90:1385-91
(stenotic)
Mean (SD)
Overlap: Necrotic core >10% of an average stable plaque
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
corecore
capcap
lumen
Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Mean (SD)
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, , ~26% of cap~26% of cap**
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
•
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, , ~26% of cap~26% of cap**
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
26%
hypocellular
hypocellular
cap
core
lumen
•• •••••••
••••
••
••
acellularacellular
26%
Ca
fibrosisfibrosis
Lp-PLA2
Mean ~ SDMean ~ SD
Kolodgie, …, Virmani. Lp-associated PLA2 … .ATVB 2006;26:2523-9
Heart 1996;76:312-6
Plaque inflammation: considerable overlap(dis)similar syndromes(dis)similar syndromes
Considerable overlap between
1. Chr. stable angina,1. Chr. stable angina, n=28n=282. Unstable angina, 2. Unstable angina, n=18n=183. Acute rest angina,3. Acute rest angina, n=12n=12
van der Wal et al. Heart 1996;76:312-6
Plaque rupture: role of inflammation
thrombusthrombus
necrotic corenecrotic core
thrombusthrombus
necrotic corenecrotic core
Plaque rupture: role of inflammation
capcapcapcapmacrophagesmacrophagesat rupture siteat rupture site(MMP, TF)(MMP, TF)
Plaque rupture: role of inflammation
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Stable Vulnerable Disrupted
% of plaque/cap
Core Cap Macr Cap SMC
Davies et al. Br Heart J 1993;69:377-81
AortaAorta
Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Mean (SD)
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)•• thrombusthrombus↑↑
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
thrombus
Fatal Coronary ThrombiPrecipitated by Plaque Rupture
Total AMI + SCD 1,460 1,114 = 76% Worldwide
Falk. JACC 2006;47:C7-12
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)•• thrombusthrombus↑↑Expansive remodeling↑
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
thrombus
No correlation!
Circ 1996;94:928-31
Coronary Remodeling & Plaque Vulnerabilitypositive but weak correlation with lipid core and macrpositive but weak correlation with lipid core and macr
Varnava, Mills, Davies. Circ 2002;105:939-43
Coronary Remodeling & Plaque Vulnerabilitypositive but weak correlation with lipid core and macrpositive but weak correlation with lipid core and macr
Varnava, Mills, Davies. Circ 2002;105:939-43
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)•• thrombusthrombus↑↑Expansive remodeling↑Angiogenesis↑• intraplaque hemorrhage
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
thrombus
A B
C D
Barger et al.Panels C & D, with further filling:
Rich capillary network confined to the plaque,= adventitia-derived
neovascularization
•• LeakyLeakyexudationexudation
•• FragileFragilehemorrhagehemorrhage
Lower edge of plaqueLower edge of plaqueneoneo--
vascularizationvascularization
neoneo--vascularizationvascularization
plaqueplaque
lumenlumen
vasavasavasorumvasorum
vasavasavasorumvasorum
LADLAD
NEJM 2003 Dec;349:2316-25
Human Pathol 1995;26:450-6
Human Pathol2005;36;330-40
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)•• thrombusthrombus↑↑Expansive remodeling↑Angiogenesis↑• intraplaque hemorrhagePerivascular inflammation
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
thrombus
Coronary artery from patient with AMI(peri)adventitial inflammation(peri)adventitial inflammation
Kohchi et al. Circulation 1985:71:709-16
iemiemmediamedia
adventitiaadventitia
intimaintima
B lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophagesB lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophagesGK Hansson, 1996
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)•• thrombusthrombus↑↑Expansive remodeling↑Angiogenesis↑• intraplaque hemorrhagePerivascular inflammationCalcification↓ & spotty
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
thrombus
Ca
Sangiorgi G et al. JACC 1998;31:126-33
Plaque
Lumen
Coronary Calcium: ~Plaque, ≠Lumen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
FibrosisNecrotic CoreCalcium
Gertz SD, Roberts WC. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:1368-72
% of plaque area
Intact Ruptured
Coronary Plaque Rupturecalcification in intact calcification in intact (stenotic)(stenotic) vs ruptured plaquesvs ruptured plaques
5%15%
Coronary Atherosclerosisruptured vs intact plaqueruptured vs intact plaque
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)•• thrombusthrombus↑↑Expansive remodeling↑Angiogenesis↑• intraplaque hemorrhagePerivascular inflammationCalcification↓ & spotty
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
thrombus
Ca
Coronary Atherosclerosistargets for imagingtargets for imaging
Plaque sizePlaque size↑↑Necrotic core↑• ~34% of plaque area*
• ~3.8 mm2 & ~9 mm long*
Fibrous capFibrous cap•• thinknessthinkness↓↓, ~23 , ~23 µµm m (95% <65 (95% <65 µµm)m)**
•• macrophagesmacrophages↑↑, ~26% of cap, ~26% of cap**
•• smooth muscle cellssmooth muscle cells↓↓ (apoptosis)(apoptosis)•• thrombusthrombus↑↑Expansive remodeling↑Angiogenesis↑• intraplaque hemorrhagePerivascular inflammationCalcification↓ & spotty
*Kolodgie, Virmani et al. Heart 2004;90:1385-91
Ruptured
Intact
•
•••••••
•
•••••
•••
corecore
capcap
lumen
thrombus
Ca
Madjid et al. ATVB 2004;24:1775-82
Vulnerable plaque(s) → Vulnerable patient
Carotid Atherosclerosisendarterectomi specimensendarterectomi specimens
Carotid Plaque → Stroke ~ CAD → AMI
Carotid Plaque → Stroke ~ CAD → AMI
Symptomatic plaques, n=106Symptomatic plaques, n=106
1 mm
CD68+ macr: red
Grønholdt MLM et al. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:137-45n=106
Symptomatic Carotid Plaquesmacr ~1.6% of plaque area macr ~1.6% of plaque area ((≠≠ plasma hsCRP)plasma hsCRP)
1 mm
CD68+ macr: red
Symptomatic Carotid Plaqueslipidlipid--rich core ~40% of plaque arearich core ~40% of plaque area
Grønholdt MLM et al. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:137-45n=106
Verhoeven et al, Stroke 2006;37:2054-60
Macr density: ~0.4% of plaque
Verhoeven et al, Stroke 2006;37:2054-60
PET-FDG
Macrin plaque
JACC 2006;48:1818 –24
Neurosurgery 2006;59(S3):219-27
Virmani R et al. Neurosurgery 2006;59(S3):219-27
Ruptured plaquecarotid (carotid (vs vs coronary)coronary)
Virmani R et al. Neurosurgery 2006;59(S3):219-27
Ruptured plaquecarotid (carotid (vs vs coronary)coronary)
Virmani R et al. Neurosurgery 2006;59(S3):219-27
Ruptured plaquecarotid (carotid (vs vs coronary)coronary)
Vessel size (blood flow)↑Plaque size↑Plaque ulceration (defect+thrombus)↑Total occlusion↓ & thromboembolism↑
Virmani R et al. Neurosurgery 2006;59(S3):219-27
Ruptured plaquecarotid (carotid (vs vs coronary)coronary)
Vessel size (blood flow)↑Plaque size↑Plaque ulceration (defect+thrombus)↑Total occlusion↓ & thromboembolism↑
Plaque rupture (vs erosion)↑• symptomatic 74% (asymptomatic: 32%)
Virmani R et al. Neurosurgery 2006;59(S3):219-27
Ruptured plaquecarotid (carotid (vs vs coronary)coronary)
Vessel size (blood flow)↑Plaque size↑Plaque ulceration (defect+thrombus)↑Total occlusion↓ & thromboembolism↑
Plaque rupture (vs erosion)↑• symptomatic 74% (asymptomatic: 32%)
Plaque hemorrhage↑↑↑
Virmani R et al. Neurosurgery 2006;59(S3):219-27
Ruptured plaquecarotid (carotid (vs vs coronary)coronary)
Vessel size (blood flow)↑Plaque size↑Plaque ulceration (defect+thrombus)↑Total occlusion↓ & thromboembolism↑
Plaque rupture (vs erosion)↑• symptomatic 74% (asymptomatic: 32%)
Plaque hemorrhage↑↑↑Necrotic core size• ruptured ~ intact plaques (vs coronary)
Virmani R et al. Neurosurgery 2006;59(S3):219-27
Ruptured plaquecarotid (carotid (vs vs coronary)coronary)
Vessel size (blood flow)↑Plaque size↑Plaque ulceration (defect+thrombus)↑Total occlusion↓ & thromboembolism↑
Plaque rupture (vs erosion)↑• symptomatic 74% (asymptomatic: 32%)
Plaque hemorrhage↑↑↑Necrotic core size• ruptured ~ intact plaques (vs coronary)
Cap thickness↑• ruptured: 72 µm (vs 23 µm in coronary)• symptomatic: 270 ± 300 µm• asymptomatic: 500 ± 500 µmCap inflammation↓• ruptured: 14 ± 11% (vs 26% in coronary• symptomatic: 1114 ± 1104 macr• asymptomatic: 385 ± 622 macr