Vulnerability Impact Assessment (VIA) in Panchase, Nepal By: Madhav Karki, Ph.D. For ISET-Nepal EBA project team GON/MFSC-UNDP/UNEP-IUCN Ecosystem-Based

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Vulnerability Impact Assessment (VIA) in Panchase, Nepal By: Madhav Karki, Ph.D. For ISET-Nepal EBA project team GON/MFSC-UNDP/UNEP-IUCN Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Project, Nepal
  • Slide 2
  • Outline Brief Introduction of Panchase Purpose and Process of VIA Adapting to the UNEP/WCMC Guide - Conceptual Framework: Integrating EBA and CBA Tools -EBA Strategy Methodology Preliminary Results Implications to the ongoing Work
  • Slide 3
  • Panchase Conservation Area (VDC Boundaries)
  • Slide 4
  • Panchase Conservation Area (Watershed boundaries)
  • Slide 5
  • Panchase Ecosystems: unique and challenging Climatic conditions (e.g. sub-tropical-temperate); Geophysical conditions (e.g. mountainous); Dominant land use by humans (e.g. agriculture and forestry ecosystem); Land cover mainly forest, grassland, fresh water, and agriculture; Species composition (e.g. Oak-Castanopsis-Quercus forests); Resource management systems and institutions (e.g. protected and community managed forests, open grazing, mixed farming system).
  • Slide 6
  • Population Growth/Decline in Project Districts Source: CBS, 2011 DistrictGeograp hic area (skm) 1991 Census data 2001 Census data 2011 Census data Rate of Pop. Growth (2001-2011) Kaski2017292945380527490429 +29% or +2.9%/anum Parbat494143547157826147076 -6.8% or - 0.68%/anum Syangja1164293526317320288040 -9.23% or - 0.923%/anum
  • Slide 7
  • Population data by VDC (2011)
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Purpose and Use of VIA To assess impacts of CC not only on society but also on the ecosystem and the links between the two, To define the objectives and focus of adaptation using ecosystem services in the centre. To develop a knowledge base for developing human centred adaptation strategy for ecosystem management to develop adaptation strategies that reduce climate sensitive risks and enhance resilience of community & ecosystem
  • Slide 10
  • PROCESS: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, STRATEGY, & ADAPTED METHODOLOGY
  • Slide 11
  • VIA of the Society & Ecosystem (Source: UNEP/WCMC Guidelines)
  • Slide 12
  • General Process for VIA and EBA strategy development (UNEP/WCMC Guidelines)
  • Slide 13
  • Climate Impacts on Fragile Systems and Marginal Agents (Source: ISET)
  • Slide 14
  • Coupled Human-Environmental System (CHES) ( Adapted from Locatelli, et al (2008)
  • Slide 15
  • Conception of System as gateways
  • Slide 16
  • Integration of EBA & CBA Tool Both CBA & EBA are human-centred Ecosystem goods and services are critical resources for people-centred adaptation Both aim to scale up and make community-driven CBA reduce peoples vulnerability; EBA enhances resilience Both recognize the relevance of local specificities CBA empowers people; EBA strengthen community- based approaches Integrated approaches better address shortcomings of both
  • Slide 17
  • EBA strategy Capitalize on natural resilience of human and eco-systems to a certain threshold level of changes; Build on these social and bio-physical system strengths ecosystem services are available for adaptation now and in future; Develop knowledge through traditional and scientific sources and processes Develop adaptation strategies that reduce climate sensitive risks and builds system resilience
  • Slide 18
  • Sustainable Management of Ecosystem Biodiversity Conservation Restoration of Ecosystem People and ecosystem EbA Strategic Framework Socio-economic Change Land use Land cover Change Climate Change
  • Slide 19
  • Different Interpretation of Vulnerability (Source: OBrian et al, 2007) Note: In the EBA context, Contextual Vulnerability is appropriate as the impacts are due to surrounding changes and existing conditions:
  • Slide 20
  • Landscape-based Vulnerability Assessment (adapted from Klausmeyer et al 2011) Vulnerability Habitat Fragmentation Habitat Loss Geo- graphy Hydro- logy Topo- graphy Historical Climate Variability Climate Change indicators Exposure Buffering Features Sensitivity Exposure Landscape ExposureClimate Stress Adaptive Constraints Impacts
  • Slide 21
  • 1. Assess Vulnerability 2. Assess Impacts 3. Assess Adaptive Constraints Community of practices 6 Resource maps 4. Assess changed sensitivity and exposure 5. New vulnerability due to Climate Stress Shared Learning Dialogue (SLD) envelop Adapted VIA Process for Panchase: 7. Adaptation planning & options Review of methods 8.Prioritized for implementation Knowledge & Information Base Monitoring and Evaluation Enhanced Risk & Threats
  • Slide 22
  • Steps for Localized System-based Vulnerability Assessment (VIA Tools for Panchase) 1.Participatory Resource Mapping 2.Adaptation Capacity/Constraint Assessment 3.Vulnerability Trend Assessment 4.Current Climate Vulnerability Mapping 5.Landscape Level Vulnerability Mapping 6.Community-level Climate Change Perception 7.Participatory Scenario Building 8.Adaptation Planning and Visioning (Shared Learning Dialogue) 9.Adaptation Strategy Development
  • Slide 23
  • PRELIMINARY RESULTS
  • Slide 24
  • Panchase Conservation Area (Land Use Land Cover Map, 1993)
  • Slide 25
  • Panchase Conservation Area (Land Use Land Cover 2010) (Source: ICIMOD)
  • Slide 26
  • Panchase Conservation Area (aspect)
  • Slide 27
  • Panchase Conservation Area (elevation)
  • Slide 28
  • Socio-economic Vulnerability (% landless households/population)
  • Slide 29
  • Resources Maps (Rivers and rivulets)
  • Slide 30
  • Adaptive Capacity/Institutional Strength Map
  • Slide 31
  • Climate Change Projections for Nepal
  • Slide 32
  • Temperature Trend Kaski (804)* * The number in the bracket is the DHM Station Number
  • Slide 33
  • Temperature Trend Kaski (804)
  • Slide 34
  • Temperature Trend, Syangja (805)
  • Slide 35
  • Temperature Trend, Syangja 805
  • Slide 36
  • Temperature Trend, Parbat 614
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Preliminary Results (Climate Stress) Cs+ Exposure +Sensitivity Based on the increasing trend both in historical and predicted Temperature data as well as high regional variability, the temperature related exposure and sensitivity are Moderate to High; Since Rainfall indicates no trend with higher frequency of extreme events observed and predicted, moisture stress in the month of May is expected to be Moderate.
  • Slide 39
  • Preliminary Results (Landscape Exposure) LE= topography+ hydrology+ geography (t+h+g) As the series of Maps indicate, the Landscape is characterized by mountainous/hilly topography with moderate to high slope gradients dominated by Southern & Western facing aspects (that are generally dry), as well as the hydrology is characterized by extreme events; the Landscape Exposure is considered Moderate.
  • Slide 40
  • VDCs Perceptional Current Vulnerability Ranking (Very low=1, Low=2, Moderate=3, High=4, Very high=5) SYSTEMS Drinking water Forest Agriculture Irrigation Transportation (Roads/Trails) indicative endangered species Electricity Other Energy Communication Grazing area Land and Ecosystem Parbat Khaulalakuri 555544 Ramja deurali 445551441 Chitre 4245 Tilahar 5544 Arthar Dandakharka 35245443 Pakuwa 555535 Kaski Chapakot 2235221 Pumdibhumdi 43543532 Kaskokot 513352 Sarangkot 323531 Dhikurpokhari 3242431 Bhadaure Tamagi 3242413 Salyan 5444 Syangja Bhatkhola 5424 Bangephadke 425452 Arukharka 4135 Bangsingh Deurali 544445
  • Slide 41
  • First order ward level vulnerability ranking ( based on field survey & gateway system )
  • Slide 42
  • Preliminary Results: Priority Themes for EBA EBA Thematic AreasPriority Counts Remarks Water related adaptation project/programme: 12 Rehab. Of Drinking Water Sources and Irrigation Structures Agriculture related adaptation project/ programme: 9 Diversifications and Water Availability Road related adaptation project/ programme: 3 Road Stabilization and Resilient Construction Energy related adaptation project/ programme: 2 Renewable and Clean Local Energy Solutions Forest related adaptation project/ programme: 2 Forest and Wildlife Management to Improve Livelihoods and Reduce People- WL conflict Land management from landslide 1 Landslides/Erosion Prevention and Rehab.
  • Slide 43
  • Adaptation decision (sample) B: Project name: Wildlife and Forest Conservation 1.Activity Options: a)Increase tourism b)Improve conservation of forest resources c)Protect and conserve water resources d)Conserve wildlife, grassland and habitat e)Conserve biodiversity 2.Objectives: a)Enhance tourism b)Publicize and promote Panchase conservation area widely c)Manage wildlife by protecting/improving habitats d)Stop deforestation and forest fire e)Identify and manage important medicinal herbs to increase income source 3. Operations (Activities): a)Local people should be made aware and concerned about the value of conservation b)Conservation with the help of helping/supportive local organizations c)Create fire lines to avoid forest fire d)Completely avoid/stop illegal hunting e)Carry out afforestation in barren land to conserve habitat f)Improve Public awareness through knowledge sharing g)Give special importance to endangered special for their conservation Resources necessary: Technicians service and technical knowhow; Financial support Improve human resources by building capacity, transfer skills, and conduct training
  • Slide 44
  • 4 VDC clusters were formed local communities were engaged in listing possible adaptation activities based on the Vulnerability scenario discussed This shared learning methods helped identify 7 thematic activities Out of these 2 to 3 options were prioritized one of which is on Forest and Biodiversity Conservation a Adaptation Scenario Building Process
  • Slide 45
  • THANK YOU