25
Page 1 A Guide To The Visual Assessement Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L FOREWORD In Malaysia as well as in most other countries in the world, the road network remains the pre- dominant mode of transportation facility. To ensure its continued efficiency and accessibili- ty, the road network has to be maintained to a high standard. Research work carried out at Institut Kerja Raya Malaysia (IKRAM) has enable Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR) Malaysia to understand and develop improved techniques for the maintenance of the road network. It is the aspiration of JKR to be able to share this knowledge with those that are involved in road building and maintenance activities. It is therefore my pleasure to introduce this first edi- tion of A Guide to Visual Assessment of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions. This guide, which is the first part of a series of guidelines on road maintenance techniques has a two fold purpose. Firstly, it is to encourage the usage of common nomenclature for the var- ious pavement conditions and secondly it hopes to promote more effective maintenance works with the indication of the possible causes of each different type of pavement distress and their probable treatments. It is my hope that this guideline will be of help to all who are involved in road maintenance activities and contribute significantly towards better maintenance techniques. (Tan Sri Dato' Ir. Wan A. Rahman Yaacob) Director General of Public Works Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This guide is prepared by the Pavement Research Unit (Head: Ir Mohamed Shafii Mustafa). The authors of this guideline are Ir Koid Teng Hye, Ir Mohamed Shafii Mustafa, Mohd Sabri Hasim, Abd. Mutalif K. A. Abd. Hameed and Ahmad Fauzi Abdul Malek. The document forms part of a series of guidelines on the design, construction and maintenance of flexible pavements which the Pavement Research Unit produces as part of their studies. The guide was reviewed by a Committee head- ed by the Director of IKRAM, Ir Ng Chong Yuen. Other members of the Committee were Ir. Han Joke Kwang - IKRAM Ir. Aik Siaw Kong - Road Maintenance, Roads Branch Ir. Tai Meu Choi - Road Maintenance, Roads Branch Ir. Zainol Rashid Zainuddin - Road Maintenance, Roads Branch; Ir. Lee Swee Kee - Road Design, Roads Branch. The authors thank the Director General of Public Works Malaysia for his permission to publish the guideline. FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY A GUIDE TO VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACE CONDITIONS

Visual Assessement of Flexible Pavement Zarikh

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

highway

Citation preview

  • Page 1

    A Guide To The Visual Assessement Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    FOREWORD

    In Malaysia as well as in most other countriesin the world, the road network remains the pre-dominant mode of transportation facility. Toensure its continued efficiency and accessibili-ty, the road network has to be maintained to ahigh standard. Research work carried out atInstitut Kerja Raya Malaysia (IKRAM) hasenable Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR) Malaysia tounderstand and develop improved techniquesfor the maintenance of the road network.

    It is the aspiration of JKR to be able to sharethis knowledge with those that are involved inroad building and maintenance activities. It istherefore my pleasure to introduce this first edi-tion of A Guide to Visual Assessment ofFlexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    This guide, which is the first part of a series ofguidelines on road maintenance techniques hasa two fold purpose. Firstly, it is to encouragethe usage of common nomenclature for the var-ious pavement conditions and secondly it hopesto promote more effective maintenance workswith the indication of the possible causes ofeach different type of pavement distress andtheir probable treatments.

    It is my hope that this guideline will be of helpto all who are involved in road maintenanceactivities and contribute significantly towardsbetter maintenance techniques.

    (Tan Sri Dato' Ir. Wan A. Rahman Yaacob)Director General of Public WorksJabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    This guide is prepared by the PavementResearch Unit (Head: Ir Mohamed ShafiiMustafa). The authors of this guideline are IrKoid Teng Hye, Ir Mohamed Shafii Mustafa,Mohd Sabri Hasim, Abd. Mutalif K. A. Abd.Hameed and Ahmad Fauzi Abdul Malek. Thedocument forms part of a series of guidelineson the design, construction and maintenance offlexible pavements which the PavementResearch Unit produces as part of their studies.

    The guide was reviewed by a Committee head-ed by the Director of IKRAM, Ir Ng ChongYuen. Other members of the Committee were

    Ir. Han Joke Kwang - IKRAM

    Ir. Aik Siaw Kong - Road Maintenance, Roads Branch

    Ir. Tai Meu Choi - Road Maintenance, Roads Branch

    Ir. Zainol Rashid Zainuddin - Road Maintenance, Roads Branch;

    Ir. Lee Swee Kee - Road Design, Roads Branch.

    The authors thank the Director General ofPublic Works Malaysia for his permission topublish the guideline.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    A GUIDE TO VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACE CONDITIONS

  • Page 2

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    CONTENTSPage

    FOREWORD

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    1.0. INTRODUCTION 2

    CATALOGUE OF DISTRESSES IN BITUMINOUS SURFACES 3

    2.0. PAVEMENT CRACKS 3

    2.1. Crocodile 42.2. Block 52.3. Longitudinal 62.4. Transverse 72.5. Edge 82.6. Crescent Shaped 9

    3.0. SURFACE DEFORMATIONS 10

    3.1. Rutting 113.2. Corrugation 123.3. Depression 133.4. Shoving 14

    4.0 SURFACE DEFECTS 15

    4.1. Bleeding 164.2. Ravelling 174.3. Polishing 18 4.4. Delamination 19

    5.0. PATCH 20

    6.0. POTHOLE 21

    7.0. EDGE DEFECTS 22

    7.1. Edge Break 227.2. Edge Drop Off 23

    GLOSSARY 24

    REFERENCES 25

    1.0. INTRODUCTION

    Assessment of pavement surface conditions is

    used in one form or another by most roaddepartments and/or highway authorities as ameasure of the ability of the pavement to con-tinue to provide the required service to the pub-lic. More importantly, it is used in determiningdeficiencies and inadequacies of pavements,the remedial measures to be taken, its fiscalneeds, planning and programming of pavementmaintenance and/or rehabilitation.

    This guide is for the assessment of flexibleroad pavements only. Concrete pavements andunpaved roads are not covered by this guide.

    The aims of this guide are :-

    i) To provide a uniform nomenclature for the description of visible pavement distresses.

    ii) to provide a comprehensive catalogue ofthe major visible distress types.

    iii) To promote the usage of distress recognition as an aid to the diagnosis of pavement deficiencies.

    Pavement distresses are categorized and quanti-fied. Illustrations of each category are providedto lend uniformity to reporting and interpreta-tion. Description of the severity of the particu-lar distress is made to conform with standardwords that express the relative severity on alow, moderate or high scale.

    The following data are also provided for eachdistress type :-

    i) Common synonym(s).

    ii) Description of the essential features ofthe distress.

    iii) Photographs of typical examples.

    iv) List of probable or most likely causes.

    v) List of probable treatments.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

  • Page 3

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    CATALOGUE OF DISTRESSES INFLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS

    Manifestation of Distresses in flexible pave-ments can be categorized into one of the fol-lowing types :

    a) Cracks

    b) Surface deformations

    c) Surface defects

    d) Patches

    e) Potholes

    f) Eedge defects

    2.0. PAVEMENT CRACKS

    Cracks are fissures resulting from partial orcomplete fractures of the pavement surface.Cracking of road pavement surfaces can hap-pen in a wide variety of patterns, ranging fromisolated single crack to an interconnected pat-tern extending over the entire pavement sur-face. The detrimental effects associated withthe presence of cracks are :

    i) Loss of water-proofing of the pavement layers.

    ii) Loss of load spreading ability of the cracked material.

    iii) Pumping and loss of fines from the base course.

    iv) Loss of riding quality through loss of surfacing.

    v) Loss of appearance.

    The loss of load spreading ability and water-proofing will usually lead to accelerated deteri-oration of the pavement condition. The possiblecauses of cracks include :

    i) Depression.

    ii) Fatigue life of the surfacing being exceeded.

    iii) Age embrittlement of the surfacing.

    iv) Reflection of cracks in underlying layers.

    v) Shrinkage.

    vi) Poor construction joints.

    This section includes the following types ofcracks:

    i) Crocodile cracks.

    ii) Block cracks.

    iii) Longitudinal cracks.

    iv) Transverse cracks.

    v) Edge cracks.

    vi) Crescent shaped cracks.

    The general form of the various types of cracksis illustrated in Fiqure 1.

    FIGURE 1 : TYPES OF CRACK

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

  • Page 4

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    CROCODILE CRACKS

    2.1. CROCODILE CRACKS

    SYNONYMS

    Alligator, chicken wire, fish net, polygonal,fatigue cracks.

    DESCRIPTION

    Crocodile cracks are interconnected or inter-laced cracks which form a network of multi-sided blocks resembling the skin of a crocodile.The block size can range from 100 mm toabout 300 mm.

    Crocodile cracks is a consequence of the inabil-ity of the structure to support the repeated loadsdue to a "softening" of the material normally associated with increase in moisture content.The cracks in the subbase or subgrade tend to

    spread rapidly under rain and traffic causingblocks of surfacing to be displaced and brokenup.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowInterconnected or interlaced hairline cracksrunning parallel to each other; cracks notspalled.

    ModerateA pattern of articulated pieces formed bycracks that may be lightly spalled. Cracks maybe sealed.

    HighPieces more severely spalled at edges and loos-ened; pieces rock under traffic; pumping mayexist.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) area affected.b) predominant crack widthc) predominant cell width.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Inadequate pavement thickness Strengthen the pavement or reconstruction

    2. Low modulus base Strengthen the base or reconstruction

    3. Brittle base Base recycling or reconstruction

    4. Poor base drainage Improve the drainage and reconstruct

    5. Brittle wearing course Replace or treat wearing course

    High severity with severe spalling

    Moderate severity with lightlyspalled cracks

    Low severity with interconnected hairline cracks

  • Page 5

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    BLOCK CRACKS 2.2. BLOCK CRACKS

    SYNONYM

    Ladder cracks.

    DESCRIPTION

    Block cracks are interconnected cracks forminga series of blocks, approximately rectangular inshape. Block sizes are usually greater than 300mm and can exceed 3000 mm.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowBlocks defined by unspalled cracks with amean width of 3 mm or less; cracks withsealant in good condition.

    ModerateBlocks defined by moderately spalled cracks;cracks with a mean width greater than 3 mm.

    HighBlocks well defined by severely spalled cracks.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) area affected.b) predominant crack width.c) predominant cell width.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREAMENTS

    1 Joints in underlying layer Crushed aggregate overlay

    2 Shrinkage and fatigue of underlying cemented materialReplace underlying cemented materials

    3 Shrinkage cracks (due to bitumen seal hardening) in bituminous surfacingSeal cracks or replace bituminoussurfacing

    4 Fatigue cracks in embrittled bituminous wearing courseCut and patch or crushed aggregateoverlay

    Low severity with cracks' width < 3 mm

    Moderate severity with cracks' width > 3 mm

    High severity with severely spalled cracks

  • Page 6

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    LONGITUDINAL CRACKS 2.3. LONGITUDINAL CRACKS

    SYNONYM

    Line cracks

    DESCRIPTION

    Longitudinal cracks are cracks which are usual-ly straight and parallel to the centre line, situat-ed at or near the middle of the lane. It can hap-pen singly or as series of almost parallel cracksor with some limited branching.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowCracks with low severity or no spalling; meanunsealed crack width of 3 mm or less.

    ModerateCracks with moderately severe spalling; meanunsealed crack width of greater than 3 mm;sealant material in bad condition.

    HighCracks with high severity spalling.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) width of dominant crack.b) length of dominant crack. c) spacing.d) area affected.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    High severity with multiple spalled cracks

    Moderate severity with crack's width > 3 mm

    Low severity single crackwithout any spalling

    NO POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1 reflection of shrinkage cracks cut and patch

    2 poorly constructed paving lanein bituminous surfacing replace bituminous surfacing

    3 displacement of joints at pavementwidening reconstruction of joints

    4 differential settlement between cut and fill reconstruction

    5 reflection of joints in the underlyingbasecrushed aggregate overlay or reconsstruction of joints

  • Page 7

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    TRANSVERSE CRACKS 2.4. TRANSVERSE CRACKS

    Transverse cracks are unconnected cracks run-ning transversely (relatively perpendicular topavement centre line) across the pavement.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowCracks with low severity or no spalling; meanunsealed crack width of 3 mm or less; sealantmaterial in good condition.

    ModerateCracks with moderate severity spalling; meanunsealed crack width of greater than 3 mm;sealant material in bad condition.

    HighCracks with high severity spalling.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) predominant crack width. b) spacing.c) length.d) area affected.

    .

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    High severitywith spalling

    Moderate severity with crack's width > 3 mm

    Low severity with crack's width< 3 mm without any spalling

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Reflection of shrinkage cracks Cut and patch

    2. Construction joint in bituminous surfacing Ccrack sealant

    3. Structural failure of portland cement concrete base Rreconstruction of base

    4. Shrinkage crack in bituminous surfacing Seal cracks or replace bituminoussurfacing

    5 Reflection of joints in the underlying base Crushed aggregate overlay orreconstruction of joints

  • Page 8

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    EDGE CRACKS 2.5. EDGE CRACKS

    DESCRIPTION

    Edge cracks are crescent shaped or fairly con-tinuous cracks, parallel to, and usually within300 mm to 600 mm of the pavement edge. Itusually occurs when paved shoulders do notexist.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowCracks with no breakup or ravelling.

    ModerateCracks with some breakup or ravelling.

    HighCracks with considerable breakup or ravellingalong edge.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) predominant crack width.b) area affected c) length

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Low severity with no breakup or ravelling

    Moderate severity with some breakup

    High severity with considerable breakup

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Excessive traffic loading at pavement edgeWiden the pavement or strengthen thepavement edge

    2. Poor drainage at pavement edge and shoulder Improve drainage and shoulder

    3. Inadequate pavement width which forces traffic too close to pavement edge Widen the pavement

    4. Insufficient bearing support Reconstruction

  • Page 9

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    CRESCENT SHAPED CRACKS 2.6. CRESCENT SHAPED CRACKS

    SYNONYMS

    Parabolic, slippage, shear cracks.

    DESCRIPTION

    This type of cracks are half moon or crescentshaped cracks, commonly associated withshoving, often occurring in closely spaced par-allel group. It is mainly associated with bitumi-nous layer only.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowCracks with-no breakup or shoving.

    ModerateCracks with some breakup or shoving.

    HighCracks with considerable breakup or shoving.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) predominant crack width.b) area affected.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Low severity with no breakup

    Moderate severity with some breakup

    High severity with considerable breakup and shoving

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Lack of bond between wearing course and the underlying layers Cut and patch

    2. Low modulus base course Reconstruction of base

    3. Thin wearing course Bituminous overlay

    4. Dragging of paver during laying whenbituminous mix temperatures were low Cut and patch

    5. High stresses due to braking and acceleration movementsBituminous overlay with stiffer mix or use high compaction mix (HCM)

  • Page 10

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    3.0. SURFACE DEFORMATIONS

    Deformation takes place when a road surfaceundergoes changes from ifs original construct-ed profile. It may occur after construction dueto trafficking or environmental influences. Insome cases, deformation may be built into anew pavement owing to inadequate controlduring construction. It influences the ridingquality of a pavement and may reflect structur-al inadequacies. It may lead to cracking of thesurface layer.

    The major types of surface deformation cov-ered in this section are :

    i) rutting.ii) corrugation.iii) depression.iv) shoving.

    The general form of the various types of sur-face deformation is illustrated in Figure 2.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    FIGURE 2 : TYPE OF SURFACE DEFORMATION

  • Page 11

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    RUTTING 3.1. RUTTING

    SYNONYMS

    Longitudinal rut.

    DESCRIPTION

    Rutting is longitudinal deformation or depres-sion in the wheel paths which occur afterrepeated applications of axle loading. It mayoccur in one or both wheel paths of a lane. Thelength to width ratio would normally be greaterthan 4 to 1.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowRut depths of less than 12 mm (measuredunder a transverse 1.2 m straight edge)

    ModerateRut depths of between 12 mm to 25 mm (mayinclude slight longitudinal cracks).

    HighRut depths of greater than 25 mm (may includemultiple longitudinal or crocodile cracks).

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) maximum depth under a transverse 1.2 m straight edge.

    b) length.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Moderate severity with rut depths between 12 mm to25mm

    High severity with rut depths > 25 mm

    Low severity with rut depths < 12 mm

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Inadequate pavement thickness Strengthening overlay or reconstruction

    2.Inadequate compaction of structural layers Reconstruction

    3. Unstable bituminous mixes Replace or recycle bituminous surfacing or use stiffer mix/HCM

    4. unstable shoulder materials which do not provide adequate lateral support

    shoulder improvement and overlay rutted area with bituminous surfacing

    5.Overstressed subgrade which deformspermanently Reconstruction

    6. Unstable granular bases or sub-bases Base or sub-base strengthening

  • Page 12

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    CORRUGATIONS 3.2. CORRUGATIONS

    SYNONYM

    Rippling

    DESCRIPTION

    Corrugations are regular transverse undula-tions, closely spaced alternate valleys andcrests with wavelengths of less than 2 m.Generally, it will result in a rough ride and willbecome worse with time.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowNoticeable (based on observation of its appear-ance and its effect on riding quality).

    Moderate Rough ride.

    HighVery rough ride. Vehicle may lose controlbecause of its presence.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) maximum depth under 1.2 m straight edge.

    b) crest to crest spacing.c) length of pavement affected.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    High severity causing very rough ride

    Moderate severity causing rough ride

    Low severity - noticeable

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Inadequate stability of bituminous surface Replace bituminous surface

    2. Compaction of base in wave form Base reconstruction

    3. Faulty paver behaviour with some mixes Replace the faulty mixes and correctthe faulty paver behaviour

    4. Heavy traffic on steep downgrade orupgrademill off corrugated surface and replacewith stiffer mix or use HCM

    5. Stopping at intersection stop lightsor roundaboutMill off corrugated surface and replacewith stiffer mix or use HCM

    6. Inadequate stability of base course Base reconstruction

  • Page 13

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    DEPRESSIONS 3.3. DEPRESSIONS

    SYNONYM

    Distortions.

    DESCRIPTION

    Depressions are localized areas within a pave-ment with elevations lower than the surround-ing area. They may not be confined to wheelpaths only but may extend across several wheelpaths. Generally, it results from settlement,slope failure, or volume changes due to mois-ture changes.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowNoticeable swaying motion. Good control ofvehicle still present. (Based on the interactionbetween vehicle and pavement surface depres-sion).

    ModerateFair control of vehicle when driving over pave-ment.

    HighPoor control of vehicle when driving overpavement with driver always having to antici-pate depression ahead.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) maximum depth under 1.2 m straight edge.

    b) area of depression.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Low severity with noticeableswaying motion

    Moderate severity with fair control of vehicle

    High severity with poorcontrol of vehicle

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. differential settlement of subgrade or basematerials subgrade or base reconstruction

    2. settlement of services and/or wideningtrenchesreconstruction of services and/orwidening trenches

    3. volume change of subgrade due toenvironmental influencesimprove sub-soil drainage andreconstruct

    4. settlement due to instability ofembankment embankment stabilization

  • Page 14

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    SHOVINGS 3.4, SHOVINGS

    DESCRIPTION

    Shoving is the bulging of the road surface gen-erally parallel to the direction of traffic and/orhorizontal displacement of surfacing materials,mainly in the direction of traffic where brakingor acceleration movements occur, caused bytraffic pushing against the pavement.Transverse shoving may arise with turningmovements.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowNoticeable. (Based on observation of itsappearance and its effect on riding quality).

    Moderate Rough ride.

    HighVery rough ride. Vehicle may lose controlbecause of its presence.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) maximum depth of bulge under 1.2 m straight edge from high point.

    b) area affected.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Low severity with noticeable swaying motion

    Moderate severity resulting in rough ride

    High severity resultingin very rough ride

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Low stability mix Mill off and replacehe bituminous surfacing

    2.Lack of bond between asphalt surface and underlying layer which may be caused byexcessive tack coat acting as lubricant

    Replace bituminous surfacing with lower binder content mix

    3. Ustable granular base reflecting through thesurface Base reconstruction

    4. Stop and start of vehicles at intersections orroundaboutMill off and replace with stiffer mix oruse HCM

    5. Inadequate pavement thickness Bituminous overlay or reconstruction

  • Page 15

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    4.0. SURFACE DEFECTS

    Surface defects cover loss of surfacing materi-als, loss of surface micro and macro textures.While they do not usually indicate pavementstructural inadequacy, they have a significantinfluence on the serviceability and safety of apavement, especially with regard to skid resist-ance, maneuverability and riding quality. Somedefects, if not corrected, may lead to subse-quent loss of pavement structural integrity.

    The major types of surface defects are:

    i) bleeding.ii) ravelling. iii) polishing. iv) delamination.

    The general form of the various defect types isillustrated in Figure 3.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    FIGURE 3 : TYPES OF SURFACE DEFECTS

  • Page 16

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    BLEEDING 4.1. BLEEDING

    SYNONYMS

    Flushing, fatting, slick, black spot.

    DESCRIPTION

    Bleeding is the presence of free bitumen binderon the surface resulting from upward migrationof the binder, causing low texture depth andinadequate tyre to stone contact. It is most like-ly to occur in the wheel paths during hotweather.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowColouring of pavement surface visible.

    ModerateDistinctive appearance with excess bitumenalready free.

    HighFree bitumen which gives the pavement sur-face a wet look. Tyre marks are evident.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) area affected.b) percentage by area of stone immersed.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Low severity with visible colouring of pavement surface

    Moderate severity with excess bitumen already free

    High severity which gives the pavement surface a wet look

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1.

    Excessive application of binder with respect to thestone size. On hot days, the binder expands into airvoids; if volume of air voids is too low, continuedexpansion results in lower stability of the mix with theconsequence that traffic will force out excess binder tothe surface.

    Apply hot sand to blot up theexcess binder

    2.Paving over flushed surfaces. The excess bitumen onthe old surface maycoat be pumped up through the new paving over a period of time

    Apply hot sand or aggregate seal coat

    3. Paving over excessively primed surfaces Apply hot sand

  • Page 17

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    RAVELLING 4.2. RAVELLING

    SYNONYM

    Fretting.

    DESCRIPTION

    Ravelling is the progressive disintegration ofthe pavement surface by loss of binder oraggregates or both.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowWearing away of the aggregate or binder hasstarted but has not progressed significantly.

    ModerateAggregate and/or binder has worn away andthe surface texture is becoming rough and pit-ted. Loose particles generally exist.

    HighAggregate and/or binder has worn away andthe surface texture is very rough and pitted.

    MEASUREMENT TO BE TAKEN

    a) area affected.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    High severity with rough and pitted surface

    Low severity where wearing away of theaggregate has not progressed significantly

    Moderate severity with worn away aggregate and binder

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Insufficient bitumen content Thin bituminous overlay

    2. Poor adhesion of bitumen binder to aggregate particles due to wet aggregate Thin bituminous overlay

    3. Inadequate compaction or constructionfduring wet weather Thin bituminous overlay

    4. Deterioration of binder and/or aggregate Thin bituminous overlay

  • Page 18

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    POLISHING 4.3. POLISHING

    DESCRIPTION

    Polishing is the smoothening and rounding ofthe upper surface of the roadstone, exposingcoarse aggregate which are glossy in appear-ance and smooth to the touch. It usually occursin the wheel paths.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    Not applicable. However, the degree of polish-ing may be reflected in a reduction of skidresistance.

    MEASUREMENT TO BE TAKEN

    a) area affected.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Smoothening and rounding of the roadstonehas progressed significantly

    Coarse aggregate exposed

    Smoothening and rounding of the upper sur-face of the roadstone has started

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1.

    Inadequate resistance to polishing of surfaceaggregates, particularly in areas of heavy traffic movements or where high stresses aredeveloped between surface and tyres

    Thin bituminous overlay or use ofstiffer mix or use HCM

    2. Use of naturally smooth uncrushed aggregates Thin bituminous overlay

  • Page 19

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    DELAMINATION 4.4. DELAMINATION

    SYNONYMS

    Peeling, surface lifting, seal break, flaking

    DESCRIPTION

    Delamination is the loss of a discrete and large(minimum 0.01 square metre) area of the wear-ing course. Usually there is a clear delineationof the wearing course and the layer below.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowPeeling of the top layer has started but has notprogressed significantly. Surface area peeledoff is less than 0.1 m2.

    ModerateSurface area peeled off is between 0.1 m2 to2.5 m2. Severe crocodile cracks in and aroundthe peeled off area.

    HighA group of more than two (2) moderate delam-inations along a short stretch of road.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) thickness of layer(s) peeled off.b) area of individual delaminations.c) number of delaminations.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Moderate severity with surface area peeled off between 0.1 m2 and 2.5 m2

    High severity with group of delaminations

    Low severity where peeling of the top surface has started

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Inadequate cleaning or inadequate t coatobefore placement of upper layers Tack mill off and re-lay upper layers

    2.Seepage of water through asphalt, especially in cracks, to break bond betweensurface and lower layers

    Replace wearing course or thinbituminous overlay

    3. Weak, loose layer immediately underlyingseal Reconstruction of weak layers

    4. Adhesion of surface binder to vehicle tyres Thin bituminous overlay

  • Page 20

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    PATCH 5.0. PATCH

    DESCRIPTION

    A patch is a repaired section of pavementwhere a portion of the pavement surface hasbeen removed and replaced (see FIGURE 4). Itmay or may not be associates) with either aloss of serviceability (apart from a loss ofappearance) or structural capacity. The `extentand frequency of patching can be useful indica-tors of the structural adequacy of the pavement.Defects can occur within a patch or the patchcan be a further defect where it is raised ordepressed below the level of the pavement sur-face.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    LowPatch is in good condition or has low severitydistress of any type. ModeratePatch has moderate severity distress of anytype.

    HighPatch has high severity distress of any type.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) area of patch at each severity level.b) number of patches at each severity level.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Patch with high severity distress

    Patch with moderate severity distress

    Patch with low severity distress

    FIGURE 4 : PATCH AND POTHOLE

  • Page 21

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions.

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    POTHOLE 6.0. POTHOLE

    DESCRIPTION

    Pothole is bowl shaped cavity in the pavementsurface resulting from the loss of wearingcourse and binder course materials (see FIG-URE 4). They are produced when trafficbreaches small pieces of the pavement surfaceallowing the entry of water. These spots disin-tegrate because of the weakening of the basecourse or poor quality surfacing. Free watercollecting in the hole and the underlying baseaccelerates its development.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) depth of pothole.b) area of pothole.c) number of potholes at each severity level.

    .

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Low severity with area < 0.3 m2 and depth < 25 mm

    Moderate severity with depth between 25 mm to 50 mm and area < 0.3 m2

    Group of potholes with depth > 50 mmand area > 0.1 m2

    AREA (square metre)

    DEPTH (mm) < 0.1 0.1 -0.3 > 0.3< 25 Low Low Moderate25-50 Moderate Moderate High> 50 Moderate High High

    NO. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1. Loss of surface course Patching

    2. Moisture entry to base course through a crackedpavement surface Cut and patch

    3. Load associated disintegration of base Base reconstruction

  • Page 22

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    FIGURE 5 : TYPES OF EDGE DEFECTS

    7.0. EDGE DEFECTS

    Edge defects occur along the interface of flexi-ble pavement and the shoulder, and are mostsignificant where the shoulder is unsealed. Thedetrimental effects of edge defects include :

    i) reduction of pavement width.

    ii) loss of quality of ride and possible loss of control of vehicle.

    iii) channelling of water at the edge of the pavement leading to erosion of shoulder.

    iv) entry of water into base.

    The defect types covered in this section are

    i) edge break.

    ii) edge drop-off.

    The general form is illustrated in Figure 5.

    EDGE BREAKS

    7.1. EDGE BREAKS

    DESCRIPTION

    Edge break occurs when the edge of the bitu-minous surface are fretted, or broken.

    SEVERITY LEVELS

    Not applicable.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKENa) length over which break occurs.b) maximum width of surfacing loss.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Significant length of edge break and surfacing loss

    Edge break with considerable breakup

    Edge break has just started

  • Page 23

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    EDGE DROP-OFFS 7.2. EDGE DROP-OFFS

    DESCRIPTION

    Edge drop-off is the difference in elevationbetween the traffic lane and outside shoulder;typically occurs when the outside shoulder set-tles or erodes. It is not usually considered adefect if the drop-off is less than 25 mm.

    SEVERITY LEVEL

    Not applicable. However, severity levels can bedefined in relation to the height of drop.

    MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN

    a) height of drop.b) length affected.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    NO POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS1. Inadequate pavement width Widen the pavement

    2. Alignment which encourages driverstotravel on pavement edge Pavement widening and realignment

    3. Inadequate edge support Shoulder strengthening

    4. Edge drop-off Sstrengthening and levelling of shoulderwith road surface5. Loss of adhesion to base Cut and patch or bituminous overlay

    Slight drop-off

    Significant drop-off

    Height of drop > 100 mm. It is a danger to traffic

    No. POSSIBLE CAUSES PROBABLE TREATMENTS

    1 Inadequate pavement width Widen the pavement

    2 Shoulder material with inadequate resistance to erosion and abrasion Replace shoulder material and reconstruct

    3 Resurfacing of pavement without resurfacing of shoulder Levelling of shoulder with road surface

  • Page 24

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    GLOSSARY

    BinderBrown or black adhesive mate rial

    Bituminous overlayA method of treat ment where the existingpave ment surface is overlaid with bituminousmaterials

    BleedingIdentified by a film of bitumi nous material onthe pavement surface that creates a shiny, glass-like, reflective surface that nay be tackyto the touch

    Block crackThe occurrence of cracks that divide the bitu-minous surface into approximately rectangularpieces, typically 0.1 m2 or more in size

    Centre lineThe white/yellow separating traffic travelling inopposite direction

    Construction jointThe point at which work is concluded andreinitiated when building a pavement

    CorrugationRegular transverse undulations, closely spacedalternate valleys and crests with wavelengths ofless than 2 m.

    Crescent shaped crackCrack which is half moon or crescent in shape,normally associated with shoving

    Crocodile crackInterconnected or interlaced crack which forma network of multisided blocks; the block sizesare smaller than 300 mm.

    Cut and patchA treatment where the distressed area is exca-vated and patched back with bituminous mate-rials

    DelaminationLoss of a discrete and large (minimum 0.01m2) area of the top bituminous layer

    DepressionLocalized area within a pavement with eleva-tions lower than the surrounding area

    Edge breakBroken or fretted pavement edge

    Edge crackFracture along the pavement edge

    Edge drop-offThe difference in elevation between the trafficlane and the shoulder

    Hairline crackA fracture that is very narrow in width

    LongitudinalParallel to the centre line of the pavement

    PatchAn area where the pavement has been removedand replaced with a new material

    PolishingSmoothening of the upper surface of the roadstone, exposing coarse aggregate, which areglossy in appearance and smooth to the touch

    PotholeA bowl-shaped cavity in the pavement surface

    PumpingThe ejection of water and fine materials underpressure through cracks under moving loads

    RavellingThe wearing away of the pavement surfacecaused by the loss of binder or the dislodgingof aggregate particles or both

    RuttingThe occurrence of longitudinal surface depres-sion/deformation in the wheel paths

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

  • Page 25

    A Guide To The Visual Assessment Of Flexible Pavement Surface Conditions

    Cawangan Jalan, Ibu Pejabat JKR, K.L

    ShovingPermanent, longitudinal displacement of alocalized area of the pavement surface causedby traffic pushing against the pavement

    SpallingBreaking or cutting off small pieces from thepavement surface

    TransversePerpendicular to the centre line of the pave-ment

    REFERENCES

    1. A Guide to the Visual Assessment of Pavement Condition, National Association of Australia State Road Authorities, 1987.

    2. Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Studies, SHRPLTPP/FR-90-001, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1990.

    3. Manual for Condition Rating of Flexible Pavements - Distress Manifestation, G.J. Chong, W.A. Phang and G.A. Wrong; Reprinted January 1982.

    4. Various Research Findings at IKRAM.

    FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

    A GUIDE TO VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMNT SURFACE CONDITIONSFOREWORDACKNOWLEDGEMENTCONTENTS1.0 INTRODUCTIONCATALOGUE OF DISTRESSES IN FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS

    2.0 PAVEMENT CRACKS2.1 Crocodile CracksSynonymsDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    2.2 Block CracksSynonymDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    2.3 Longitidinal CracksSynonymDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    2.4 Transverse CracksSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    2.5 Edge CracksDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    2.6 Crescent Shaped CracksSynonymDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    3.0 SURFACE DEFOMATIONS3.1 RuttingSynonymsDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    3.2 CorrugationsSynonymDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    3.3 DepressionsSynonymDescriptionSeverity LevelsMEasurements To Be Taken

    3.4 ShovingsDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    4.0 SURFACE DEFECTS4.1 BleedingSynonymsDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    4.2 RavellingSynonymDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    4.3 PolishingDescription Severity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    4.4 DelaminationSynonymsDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    5.0 PATCHDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    6.0 POTHOLEDescription Severity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    7.0 EDGE DEFECTS7.1 Edge BreaksDescription Severity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    7.2 Edge Drop-offsDescriptionSeverity LevelsMeasurements To Be Taken

    GLOSSARYREFERENCES