~,~-NATIONAL SECURITY. VIRECTZVE NUMB

':-' - UllULHUUH ILU

WASHINGTON

1986

SYSTEM II 90744

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTI GOTIATING ROOND (S)

The attached instruction• supplement existing guidance for the current round of the Nuclear and Space Talks (NST) which began on September 18, 1986, in Geneva. They set forth in detail the proposals made to General Secretary Gorbachev during my meeting with him in Reykjavik, Iceland, and provide guidance for building on the agreements we reached there. (S)

Attachments 1. overall Ins ns of Octobe 1986 (S) 2. START Inst of October 6 (S) 3. Defense and pace Instructions o tober 21, 1986 (S) 4. INF Instructions of October 22, 1986 (S) s. overall Instructions of October 27, 1986 (S) 6. Defense and Space Instructions of October 27, 1986 (S)

OADR

OP IMMED DE RUEHC 10271 2950316 0 2203112 OCT 86 FM SECSTATE WASHDC

OVERALL INS

TO USDEL NST GENEVA IMMEDIATE 1743 S E C R E T STATE 330271

EXDIS, USNST

E.O. 12356: DECL:OADR TAGS: PARM, INF, START, SUBJECT: (S) ADDITIONAL AND SPACE TALKS

REF: STATE 291634

l.

TSPA, NST, OS CE FOR US/SO

2. FOLLOWING IS ADDITI UIDANCE FOR

NS

CLEAR

DELEGATION FOR ROUND V ECTING DISCU IN OCTOBER 11-12 REYKJAVIK MEETING. WASHINGTON CONTINUES TO EVALUATE HOW BEST TO BUILD UPON POSITIVE

ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THAT MEETING AND WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE SHORTLY, INCLUDING GUIDANCE ON THE CONCEPT OF ELIMINATING ALL OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILES AND ITS LINX TO OBLIGATION ITH RESPECT TO ABM

SYSTEM II 90744 ATTACHMENT 1

TREATY. PREVIOUS GUID REFTEL) REMAINS ID EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. GUI FOR EACH OF E NEGOTIATING GROUPS IS ROVIOED S

3. U.S OBJECTIVES INCLUDE:

-- TO BUILD UPON THE REYKJAVIK BY INDUCING SERIOUSNESS AND FLEXIB

ACCOMPLI IETS TO CONT !SPLAYED THE

I

-- TO PRESENT U.S. UNDERSTANDINGS REA INSTRUCTIONS TO.

-- TO REJECT SOVIET UNDERSTANDINGS REACHED

FOR AMPLIE YKJAVIK, TING GR

-- TO REJECT SOVIET A TO HOLD PROG NEGOTIATING FORUM HOST PROGRESS IN DELEGATION SHOULD VIGO OBJECT TO

THE

CHARACTERIZATION THAT PROGRESS IN INF IS ONCE AGAIN LINKED TO PROGRESS IN OTHER AREAS, NOTING THAT THIS CONTRADICTS SPECIFIC UNDERSTANDING REACHED DURING GENEVA SUMMIT TO SEEK A SEPARATE INF AGREEMENT AND TO ACCELERATE PROGRESS IN AREAS OF COMMON GROUND.

4. SHOULD SOVIETS RAISE ISSUE OF ELIMINATION OF ALL OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILE BY 1996, AS PROPO ED BY PRESIDENT IN REYKJAVIK, DE TION SHOULD NO THAT THE FIRST STEP IN THE ELIMI OF BALLISTIC ILES MUST BE THE SO-PERCENT STAR IONS AND SI INF REDUCTIONS DISCUSSED AVIK AND S MORE EFFICIENT TO DISCUS PS FIRST WASHINGTON ANTICI ING THI DETAILED GUIDANCE C MISSI 27 OCTOBER.)

S. IF THE SOVIETS RAI OL ISSUES, THE DELEGATION ISSUES SHOULD BE PURSUED IN ST. SHOULD THE SOVIETS SPE TING AND PROGRESS IN NST, AS SU BY GENERAL Y GoRBACHEV IN REYKJAVIK, DELEGATION SHOULD REPLY THAT THE

UNITED STATES EXPRESSED ITS READINESS IN REYKJAVIK TO ENTER NEGOTIATIONS ON NUCLEAR TESTING ISSUES AND THAT SPECIFIC SOVIET RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE RAISED IN THE APPROPRIATE CHANNELS. THE DELEGATION SBOUID RESIST ANY FURTHER SOVIET EFFORTS TO DISCUSS LIMITATIONS ON NUCLEAR TESTING IN THE NST FORUM. HULTZ * * END OF CABLE **

OP IMMED OE RUEHC #0273 2950318 0 220312Z OCT 86 FM SECSTATE WASHOC

TO USOEL NST G S E C R E T STATE

EXDIS, USSTART

E.O. 12356: OECL:OAOR TAGS: PARM, START, MC SUBJECT: ( S) AOOITIONA GROUP

0000

FOR STAR

REF: (A) STATE 291634 (B) STATE 2902~0

l. SECRET - ENTIRE TEXT.

I AT ING

2. FOLLOWING IS ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FOR THE START

w•- .... .-•. •• 90744 ATTACHMENT 2

NEGOTIATING GROUP IN RO OCTOBER 11-12 REYKJAVI TO EVALUATE HOW BEST ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF ADDITIONAL GUID~

I, REFLECTING ING. WASHING

UPON POSI ING AND WI

INCLUDI

TIMEFRAME FOR SO-PERCE OF ELIMINATING ALL OFF

CONCEPT

3 . IT ING THAT THE ING WAS AGREED ANO, THEREFORE, S. START NE G GROUP SHOULD CONFIRM THEIR ACCEPTANCE BY THE SOVIETS:

-- A 1600 CEILING ON ICBMS, SLBMS, HEAVY BOMBERS;

-- A 6000 CEILING ON WARHEADS, TO INCLUDE ICBM WARHEADS, SLBM WARHEADS, AND LONG-RANGE ALCMS.

-- ALL HEAVY BOMBERS COUNT AGAINST THE SNOV LIMIT. EACH HEAVY BOMBER CARRYING GRAV BOMBS OR SRAMS LO COUNT AS ONE WARHEAD TOWARD IT OF 6000. E LCM CARRIED BY HEAVY BOMBER COUNT AS 0 AO. (FYI: AS PART OF THE TIONS ON ISIONS, ACCOUNTING RULES FO ING THEM TO BE WORKED OUT, AND WA ITES OE VIEWS ON SUCH RULES . )

-- CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUE.

HEAVY ICBMS WOULD BE

THE SIDES SHALL FI ALLY ACCEPT LUTION TO LIMITING DEPLOYMENT OF LONG-RANGE NUCLEAR-ARMED SLCMS. WHEN SUCH A SOLUTION IS FOUND, IT WILL NOT INVOLVE COUNTING LONG-RANGE NUCLEAR-ARMED SLCMS WITHIN THE 6000/1600 LIMITS. IN THIS REGARD, THE DELEGATION SHOULD SEEK OUT DETAILS, ESPECIALLY DETAILS RELATING TO VERIFICATION, OF THE SOVIET POSITION THAT WOULD ATrEMPT TO MEET U.S. CONCERNS.

4. IN THE CONTEXT OF GRAVITY BOMBS AND SRMS LIMIT HEAVY BOMBERS A PART OF OUR POSITI

5 . AT REYKJAVIK, PROVISIONS WOULD BA ORDER TO MAKE A COMP SUBLIMITS WERE DISCUSS THE CONSIDERATION OF S START NEGOTIATING GRO SUBLIMITS ON:

VE AGREEMENT 0 PREVIOUS U.S.

REDUNDANT

IN

BALLISTIC MISSILE

ICBM WARHEADS;

WARHEADS ON AL BASED LIGHT AND-... -- WHILE THE PREFERRED REMAIN 4500, 3000, AND NEGOTIATING GROUP IS A

S;

ICBMS E WITH SI

RS FOR THESE RESPECTIVELY

ZED TO PROPOS

ON SILO­WARHEADS;

4800 BALLISTIC MISSILE ADS, 3300 ICB ADS, AND 1650 WARHEADS ON ICBMS EXCEPT SILO-BASED LIGHT OR MEDIUM ICBMS WITH SIX OR FEWER WARHEADS. (NOTE: THIS PROPOSAL

RESULTS IN NO RPT NO SUBLIMIT ON ALCMS.)

-- THE AFOREMENTIONED SUBLIMITS ARE THE U.S. PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING THE SOVIET OFFER IN REYKJAVIK HEAVY ICBMS BE SIGNIFICANT REDUCED. THE U.S ANTICIPATES THAT SUCH AN OACH WILL REDUC ICBMS SIGNIFICANTLY (E. ROUGHLY HALF APPROPRIATE MANNER.

-- ALL OTHER ELEME PROPOSAL REMAIN AND THE SO-PERCENT WEIGHT).

6. THE OCTOBER 15 SOV NARY STAT THE SOVIET PROPOSAL FOR 50 REDUCTIONS AL SNDVS AND WEAPONS AS WELL AS H CATEGORY 0 EGIC SYSTEM (I.E. I ICBMS, s HEAVY BO ICH WAS PRESENTED IN REYKJAVIK AND REJECTED BY THE U.S .. SHOULD THIS FORMULATION BE TABLED IN GENEVA, THE NEGOTIATING GROUP SHOULD REJECT THE PROPOSAL AS FOLLOWS:

-- IN REYKJAVIK THE SIDES AGREED IN PRINCIPLE TO 50-PERCENT RF.DUCTIONS IN STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS, SPECIFICALLY TO 1600 SNOVS AND 6000 WARHEADS APPROPRIATELY APPLIED. C AIN OTHER ELEMENT INITIAL SOVIET FORMULATIO ROPOSED IN REYKJ DETERMINED BY THE U.S. TIME TO RES INEQUITABLE OUTCOME FORE WERE U.S. PROPOSAL FOR SO REDUCTIONS ELEMENTS MUTUALLY REYKJAVIK AN AGREED EQUIT

7. EFFECTIVE VERIFI AS AGREED AT GENEVA SHOULD BE NEGOTIATED C LIMITATIONS. THE TWO PROGRESS MADE IN INF W PRINCIPLES (SEE INF IN

S ESSENTIAL , VElUFICATI

LY WITH SHOULD SEEK SPECT TO VERI IONS, PARA 4)

OF THE K WERE

AN THE

ON THOSE DES FOR

SIDES. SURES NS AND y ON

NEGOTIATIONS ON

8. EXCEPT AS MODIFIED REMAIN UNCHANGED.

9. PARAGRAPH 9A

-·PROPOSAL MADE IN RE PARAGRAPH 9B CONTAINS U. S.-SOVIET EXPERTS GR OCTOBER. BOTH ARE PRO THE NEGOTIATING GROUP.

FENSIVE ARMS.

I PREVIOUS

TEXT 0

ER 11. THE

ING OF 12 TION OF

-- A. INITIAL SOVIET P L, AM OCTOBER ON STRATEGIC ARMS. AN AGREEMENT TO REDUCE BY FIFTY PERCENT

THE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS OF THE USSR ANO THE USA TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE HISTORICALLY FORMED DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURES OF THE PARTIES' STRATEGIC FORCES. WITHIN THIS FRAMEWORK, REDUCTIONS SHALL APPLY TO ALL TYPES O OFFENSIVE STRATEG ARMS, INCLUDING HEAVY MISSILES. SOLUTION SHALL 0 BE FOUND WITH REGARD TO LI G THE DEPLOYME LONG-RANGE SEA-LAUNCHED CR SSILES.

ON ALL MATTERS RE OFFENSIVE ARMS FOR THEIR MUTUAL I A POLITICAL WILL TO

-- B. EXPERTS GROUP

12. ON STRATEGIC ARMS TO REDUCE BY FIFTY PER AN EQUAL NUMBER OF ICBMS, SLBMS ANO HEAVY BOMBERS (APPROXIMATELY 1600) ANO WARHEADS (NOT MORE THAN 6000), TAKING INTO ACCOUNT HISTORICALLY FORMED DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURES OF THE PARTIES' STRATEGIC FORCES. WITHIN THIS FRAMEWORK, REDUCTIONS SHALL APPLY TO ALL TYPES OF STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS, INCLUDING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF HEAVY MISSILES. A MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE SOLtrrION SHALL 0 BE FOUND TO LI TING DEPLOYMENT OF LONG-RANGE LEAR-ARMED SEA- D CRUISE MISSILES.

ON ALL MATTERS RELA OFFENSIVE ARMS THE FOR THEIR MUTUAL A POLITICAL WILL ** END OF CABLE **

EGIC REGARD

!SPLAYING

..

OP IMMED DE RUEHC #0272 29503 0 220311Z OCT 86 FM SECSTATE WAS

TO USDEL NST GENEVA I S E C R E T STATE 330

EXDIS, USDST

E.O. 12356:0ECL:OADR

SE AND SPAC

0000

SYSTEM II 90744 ATTACHMENT 3

RUCTIONS

TAGS: PARM, MCAP, TSPA, NST, OST SUBJECT: (S) ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FOR DEFENSE AND SPACE NEGOTIATING GROUP

REF: (A) STATE 291909; (B) STATE 29566

1. SECRET - ENTIRE TEXT.

2. FOLLOWING IS ADDITIO SPACE NEGOTIATING GROUP PROPOSALS MADE TO THE

IOANCE FOR OUND VI, BAS UNION IN I ING

.... -BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT AND OCTOBER 11-12. THIS GU DOES NOT REPLACE GUID REFTELS (A) AND {B) SPECIFICALLY NOTED I

3. THE EXISTING US PR GUIDANCE AND IN THE P GENERAL SECRETARY GORB

ERAL SECRETARY IS IN ADOITI

R, D&S NEGOTI IOUS ROUNDS

U llUl.l\\I VII I ... "'

ACHEV ON , AND GROUP OF

AS

4. PARAGRAPH (4A) CO INITIAL ROPOSAL MADE IN REYKJAVIK ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE DISCUSSIONS. PARAGRAPH {4B) PROVIDES THE TEXT OF THE FIRST US ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL MADE BY THE PRESIDENT TO GENERAL SECRETARY GORBACHEV IN REYKJAVIK ON THE AFTERNOON OF THE SECOND DAY OF DISCUSSIONS. PARAGRAPH (4C) PROVIDES THE TEXT OF THE SOVIET COUNTERPROPOSAL MADE THAT SAME AFTERNOON. PARAGRAPH (40) PROVIDES THE TEXT OF THE SECOND AND LAST US ALTERNAT VE PROPOSAL MADE I WRITING BY THE PRESIDENT. THESE PROVIDED FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE NEGOT G GROUP.

A. SOVIET PROPOSAL, ER 11. FOR STRENGTHENING THE R 1972 T LIMITATION OF ANT MISSILE OF UNLIMITED DURAT ERSTAND THAT THE USSR AND ERTAKE N THEIR RIGHT TO WITHDRAW THAT TREATY TEN YEARS, AND TO STRIC MPLY WITH AL PROVISIONS THROUGHOUT RIOD. TESTI ALL MISSILE-DEFENSE SPA NTS SHALL EXCEPT FOR RESEARCH AND NG CARRIED 0 LABORATORIES. THIS WO ENTAIL A B

ICH IS REACHED

E:XE.:ISE ERIOD OF

TESTING OF SUCH FIXED LAND-BASED SYSTEMS AND THEIR COMPONENTS AS ARE ALLOWED UNDER THE ABM TREATY. SUBSEQUENTLY, WITHIN SEVERAL YEARS, THE PARTIES SHALL NEGOTIATE FURTHER MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS IN THIS AREA. THE PARTIES DEEM IT APPROPRIATE TO UNDERTAKE ADDITIONAL EFFORTS WITH A VIEW TO ACHIEVE Mtm.JALLY ACCEPTABLE AGREEMENTS BANNI ANTI-SATELLITE S STEMS.

B. FIRST US PROPOSAL, AGREE TO CONFINE THEMS TESTING, WHICH IS PE PERIOD OF FIVE YEAR 50 PERCENT REDUCT BE ACHIEVED. THI THE PACE OF REDUCT! OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MI ELIMINATION OF ALL OF END OF THE SECOND FIVE REDUCTIONS CONTINUE AT RESTRICTIONS WILL CONT

BER 12. BOTH RESEARCH,

Y THE ABM 1991, D

EGIC NU , BOTH

... ~~SPECT TO WITH THE GO BALLISTIC MI ERIOO. AS PROPRIATE PA

APPLY. AT

ES WOULD PMENT AND FOR A

TIME A S WOULD

CONTINUE IN ING

TOTAL BY THE THESE

SAME OF TEN

YEAR PERIOD, WITH ALL OFF ELIMINATED, EITHER SIDE DEFENSES.

C. SOVIET PROPOSA UNITED STATES WOU EXERCISE THEIR.EX! TREATY, WHICH IS OF PERIOD STRICTLY TO OBS TESTING IN SPACE OF AL

IVE BALLISTIC MI BE FREE TO D

BER 12. E FOR T

OF WI DURATION,

LL ITS PROVIS E COMPONENTS

DEFENSE IS PROHIBITED, X RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN LABORATORIES. WITHIN THE FIRST

LES UHbZASS/f /EO

THE TO

M THE ABM ING THAT THE

SILE

OF THE TEN-YEAR PERIOD (AND THUS THROUGH 1991), THE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS OF THE TWO SIDES SHALL BE REDUCED BY 50 PERCENT. DURING THE FOLLOWING FIVE YEARS OF THAT PERIOD, THE REMAINING SO PERCENT OF THE TWO SIDES' STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS SHALL BE REDUCED. THUS BY THE ENO OF 1996, THE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS OF THE USSR ANO THE UNITED STATES ILL HAVE BEEN TOT LY ELIMINATED.

D. SECOND US PROPOSA TOBER 12. RAND THE UNITED STATES UNDER EN YEARS ERCISE THEIR EXISTING RIG RAWAL F TREATY, WHICH IS OF UNLIM N, AND PERIOD STRICTLY TO OBSERVE ROVISIONS NTINUING RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT TING, WHICH RMITTED BY THE ABM TREATY. WI FIRST FIVE OF THE TEN-YEAR PERIOD (AND OUGH 1991) I RATEGIC OFFENSIVE .ARMS OF THE ES SHALL BE BY 50 PERCENT. DURING THE F FIVE YEARS T PERIOD, ALL REMAINING VE BALLISTIC S OF THE TWO SIDES SHALL BE REDUCED. THUS BY THE END OF 1996, ALL OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSII,.ES OF THE USSR AND THE UNITED STATES WILL HAVE BEEN TOTALLY ELIMINATED. AT THE END OF THE TEN-YEAR PERIOD, EITHER SIDE COULD DEPLOY DEFENSES IF IT SO CHOSE UNLESS THE PARTIES AGREE OTHERWISE.

5. GUIDANCE ON THE US PRO UNDER CONSIDERATION IN W ANALYTICAL WORX. IN SHOULD AVOID DISCUSS! THE US PROPOSALS.

6. IF QUESTIONED REYKJAVIK, THE US THE US INTENDS TO BUI,.... ....... ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE US WILL BE MA.KING A PR ACCOMPLISHMENTS SHORTL

SALS MADE AT NCTON, INCLUDI

IM, THE NE SPECIFICS

US PROP C GROUP S

THE POSITIVE AVIK MEETING,

IN GENEVA BA ASKED WHETHE

VIK IS OITIONAL NC GROUP

R OF

THAT

ADDITIONAL COMMITME DISCUSSED IN REYKJA NEGOTIATING GROUP CLEAR BY THE TERMS ADDITIONAL COMMI BY THE US WERE STRICTL REACHING A MUTUALLY SA

SCHEDULE OF REDUCTIONS REDUCTIONS IN THE STRA

w••ULMuuJtJtU 4

OSALS IONS, THE

IT WAS

SIDES TO EQUAL LEVELS BY 1991 AND TOTAL ELIMINATION OF THE OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILES OF BOTH SIDES BY 1996. SHULTZ ** END OF CABLE **

..

OP IMMEO OE RUEHC #1883 296134 O 23133SZ OCT 86 -ZFF FM SECSTATE WASHDC

TO USOEL NST GENEV S E C R E T STATE 33

EXDIS

C O R R E C T E 0 C O

E.O. 12356: DECL: OADR TAGS: PARM, NST, INF

5 SUB P

0 90744 ATTACHMENT 4

IMMEDIATE

1 MISSING)

SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FOR THE INF NEGOTIATING GROUP

A) STATE 290224 (B) STATE 12553

1. SECRET -

2. FOLLOWING IS ADDI NEGOTIATING GROUP I OCTOBER 11-12 REYK

EVALUATE HOW BEST. TO B OF THAT MEETING AND WI SHORTLY, INCLUDING GUI ALL OFFENSIVE BALLISTI A) REMAINS VALID EXC~

GUIDANCE FOR I, REFLECT ING. WAS

ON POSIT! VIDE ADDITION

N THE CONCEP ILES. PREVIO OIFIEO BELOW

F SSIONS !N NTINUES TO

LISHMENTS DANCE LIMINATING DANCE (REF

3. AGREED APPROACH. BASED ON REYKJAVIK DISCUSSION, THE U.S. IS READY TO ACCEPT--AND WE UNDERSTAND THE SOVIETS CAN ACCEPT--AN LRINF CEILING OF 100 WARHEADS ON EACH SIDE, MADE UP OF ZERO WARHEADS ON EACH SIDE IN EUROPE AND 100 WARHEADS ON EACH SIDE OUTSIDE OF EUROPE IN SOVIET ASIA ON THE SOVIET SIDE, AND IN THE U.S. ON THE U.S. SIDE. NEGOTIATING GROUP SHOULD CONFIRM SOVIET ACCEPTANCE OF THIS APPROACH.

4. THE U.S. BELIEVES-­ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE-­SHOULD BE SPECIFIC (1) A COMPREHENSIVE PRIOR TO REOUCTIO OBSERVATION OF ELI EFFECTIVE MONITORING ASSOCIATED FACILITIES, PREVIOUS GUIDANCE ON CONTINUES TO APPLY.

SOVIETS THERE INCLUDE: TA, BOTH

S; AND (3) ORIES AND

TION. !CATION

5. ADDITIONAL ELEMENT REYKJAVIK, S UNDERSTOOD THAT OTHER ONS WOULD HA E ADDED TO WHAT WAS AGREED IN ORDER TO MAKE A COMPLETE AGREEMENT. IN THIS CONTEXT, THE U.S. PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING:

REDUCTIONS PROVIDED FOR IN THE APPROACH IN PARA 3 WOULD BE CARRIED OUT IN A PHASED MANNER TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE END OF 1991.

PREVIOUS CUIDANC SOVIET ASIA (REF B) CO THE APPROACH IN PARA 3

THE NEGOTIAT TO RESTRICT THE 1 MISSILES ALLOWED PREFERABLY l<ANSK. MAY NOT OFFER RECIPR DEPLOYMENT IN ALASKA. TO USE ALASJ<AN-NON-DEP WITHDRAWN.

AGREEMENT 33 ss-20 BARNAUL, VER, GROUP

VING NON­OR I ZAT I ON

IS

AN INF AGREEMENT S CONSTRAINTS ON SRINF MIS NEGOTIATIONS ON REDUCT WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFT REACHED .

THE U.S: ·c · INF AGREEMENT BE OF BY AN AGREEMENT ON FUR

SUCH A FURTHER AGREEM ANY INTERIM AGREEMENT.

LO INCLUDE AS WE S AS PREVIOUSLY N SRINF MISSI NITIAL INF

REQUIRE TE DURATIO EDUCTIONS;

.. ... ... ~ GLOBAL LED (REF. B) LL BEGIN

IS

AS PART OF .

6. THE INF NEGOTIATING GROUP SHOULD STRESS THAT THE U.S. PROCEEDS ON THE PREMISE THAT AN INF AGREEMENT CAN BE

NEGOTIATED, CONCLUDED AND IMPLEMENTED SEPARATELY FROM DEFENSE AND SPACE AND START ISSUES AND THAT THE U.S. DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY CONTRARY PREMISE FOR PROCEEDING TOWARD AN INF AGREEMENT.

7. PARAGRAPH 7A CONTAI INF PROPOSAL. MADE IN PARAGRAPH 7B CONTAIN THE U.S . -SOVIET EX MORNING OF 12 OCT THIS LANGUAGE. BO THE INFORMATION OF

TEXT OF THE IK THE MORN!

. COUNTERP MEETING WAS NO

LANGUAGE ATING GRO

A. SOVIET PROPOSAL, ER 11 . ON MISSILES. AN AGREEME COMPLETE SOVIET AND U. S.MEDIUM- ISSILES IN NUCLEAR POTENTIALS OF RITAIN AND F

L SOVIET TOBER 11. ABLED AT

EARLY ~~NT TO

ED FOR

AFFECTED OR TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. NEGOTIATIONS SHALL BE INITIATED ON THE PARTIES' MISSILES WITH RANGES BELOW 1,000 KILOMETERS. SEPARATELY, AND AS EARLY AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE, NEGOTIATIONS SHALL BE INITIATED ON SOVIET AND U. S. MEDIUM-RANGE SYSTEMS IN ASIA.

B. U. S. LANGUAGE TABLED A THE SIDES AGREE:

THAT SINCE THERE PROPER TREATMENT OF RESOLUTION OF THIS BASIS.

STRAINTS ON ET LEVEL, WHI S OF THESE SY

U.S. AND THE

' OBER 11.

ON THE IA, THE I OR I TY

THERE WILL BE SPECIFIC INCLUDE: ( l) A COMPREHEN DATA, BOTH PRIOR TO RED SITE OBSERVATION OF OE AND(3) EFFECTIVE MON INVENTORIES AND AS INSPECTION.

U.S. ANO SOVIET INF SUBJECT TO ANO CONSTRAI SIDES NEGOTIATE FURTHER

SYSTEMS. SHULTZ ** END OF CABLE **

' .. -._. -

RIFICATION MEASU WHICH GE OF

2) ON­c:.J:J..,___,EVELS;

ANO ACCURATE E S AND THEREA ON DOWN TO F THE REMA CILITIES

NF ON-SITE

IN IL THE

· SUBJECT: TAGS: REFS:

1. SECRET ~

ION

SYSTEM II 90744 ATTACHMENT 5

2. REFTEL A PROVID TIAL POST-RE GUIDANCE FOR .THE NST DELEGATION FOR R I, REFLECTING SSIONS IN OCTOBER 11-12 REYKJAVIK MEET THIS CABLE PR ADDITIONAL .. CONTINGENCY GUIDANCE LATIONSHIP OF 0 THE CONCEPT OF ELIMINATING ALL OFF ISTIC MI PREVIOUS GUIDANCE (REFS A AND B) REMAINS VALID EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. GUIDANCE

FOR THE DEFENSE AND SPACB NEGOTIATING GROUP IS BEING PROVIDED SEPTEL. THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FOR START AND INF NEGOTIATING GROUPS THIS ROUND.

3. THE U.S. PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE ALL OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILES, OF WHATEVER RANGE, INVOLVES SNF SYSTEMS OF RANGES LESS THAN THOSE PREVIOUSLY THE OBJECT OF NEGOTI IONS. DISCUSSION OF SUCH SYSTEMS MAY REQUI REEM.ENT ON AN OPRIATE NEGOTIATING FORUM. ONLY THE GENE NCEPT OF ELIM NG ALL OFFENSIVE BASLLISTIC MISSILES BE INTRODUC ROUND. SHOULD THE SOVIETS RAISE QUEST NEGOTIATIN FOR SNF MISSILES IN THIS REGARD, DELE ULD NOTE BIS TIME IT IS THE U.S. OPINION T GOTIAT Y PROVIDE THE MOST LOGICAL FORUM.

SECRET Declassify on: OADR

IEWED THESE INDIVIDUAL LEGATION'S V G ROUND.

UCTIONS AND TING GROUPS, N APPROPRIATE ENDING

SECRET

SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL GU NEGOTIATING

TAGS: PARM, MCAP, REF: (A) STAT

1. SECRET --.E

2. FOLLOWING IS NEGOTIATING GROUP FO PROVIDED IN REF C. REPLACE GUIDANCE FOR ANO (C) EXCEPT AS MO GUIDANCE FOR START

GUIDANCE VI. IT SUP

!DANCE IS IN GOTIATING GR BELOW. THE NEGOTIATING

90744. ATTACHMENT 6

AND SPACE

(C) STATE 330272

DEFENSE ANO SPACE S THE GUIDANCE

ION TO, AND DOES NOT REFTBLS (A) , .. (B) BE NO ADDITIONAL THIS ROUND.

3. IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING PROPOSAL IN THE PRESIDENT'S JULY 25 LETTER TO GENERAL SECRETARY GORBACaEV, WHICH REMAINS ON THE TABLE, THE US NEGOTIATING GROUP IS AUTHORIZED TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS FOR AN AGREEMENT WHICH WE PROPOSED IN REYKJAVIK AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE PRESIDENT'S JULY PROPOSAL.

THE USSR AND THE UNI NOT TO EXERCISE THEIR EX TREATY, WHICH IS OF UN STRICTLY TO OBSERVE DEVELOPMENT AND TES

D STATES WOULD ING RIGHT OF WIT ED DURATION,

RTAKE FOR.TEN YEARS WAL FROM THE ABM

RING THAT PERIOD ONT1NUING RESEARCH,

"'vr~y THE ABM TREATY.

WITHIN THE THROUGH 1991), T SHALL BE REDUCED

DURING THE FOLLO REMAINING OFFENSIVE B ELIMINATED.

PROVISIONS ICH ARE PE

96, ALL OFF

PERIOD (AND THUS THE TWO SIDES

ERIOD, THE TWO SIDES SHALL BE

OF THE USSR AND THE UNITED STATES WILL HAVE BEEN TOTALLY ELIMINATED, AND EITHER SIDE COULD DEPLOY ADVANCED STRATEGIC DEFENSES IF IT SO CHOSE, UNLESS THE PARTIES AGREE OTHERWISE.

4 • THE ABOVE UNDERTAKINGS. WOULD BE RECORDED IN A NEW TREATY.

5. IN PRESENTING THE AB ~ PROPOSAL, THE SHOULD MAlCE CLEAR THAT ABOVE COMMI CONDITIONED ON THE TWO S' REACHING A AGREEMENT NOW, AS P NEW TREATY, REDUCTIONS RESULTIN PERCENT OFFENSIVE FORCES DES TO ELIMINATION OF BALLI

~\~-~ON: OAOR

IATillG GROUP OULD BE STRICTLY

Y SATISFACTORY SCHEDULE OF

IN THE STRATEGIC S BY 1991 AND TOTAL ES. OF BOTH SIDES BY

SECRET 2 0 ~ ~!l~ltltll 6 • WHEN PRESENTING T NEGOTIATOR SHOULD MAJ{

TO WITHDRAW FROM TH ITS RIGHT TO WITHD INTEREST, OR TO CIRCUMSTANCES_ INDICATE THAT:

A BLANKET IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

THE US IS

OSITION DESCRIB CLEAR THAT IN REATY, NEITH REASONS OP A MATER!

ER I

MORE LIMITED COMMI DEPLOYING .ADVANCED DEPBNSES.

N PARA 3-5, THE US .ERCIS.ING ITS RIGHTS :WOULD BE FORFEITING

-'-"•·.uoa NATIONAL OR OTHER

LAW. HE SHOULD

OF WITHDRAWAL

. ONCERNS THROUGH A THE PURPOSES OP ·

NEW CONDITIONS FOR WITHDRAWAL WOULD HAVE TO BE NEGOTIATED AND AGREED AS PART OF TBB PROPOSED TREATY DESCRIBED IN PARA 4 AND 5 ABOVE. WE WOULD EXPECT SUCH CONDITIONS TO INCLUDE A MATERIAL BREACH OF THAT TREATY OR LINKED AGREEMENTS (B.G., FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THE SCHEDULE OF REDUCTIONS PROVIDED IN AN ASSOCIATED START TREATY).

IP THE SOVI DISCUSS THEM.

7. IF THE SOVIET PRESIDENT'S PRO EXERCISE THEIR THE NEGOTIATOR SH FINDING A SOLUTION W NON-WITHDRAWAL PHRAS AND SOVIET CONCERNS.

SECRET

WE AR.! PREPARED TO'

GUAGE IN THE ER YEARS NOT TO ROM THE ABM TREATY•)

ANTICIPATED OUR R.BTATION OF THE

OMMODATED BOTH US