Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Victorian Public Entity Executive Classification Framework Summary and context
1. The classification framework for executives in Victorian public entities aims to provide clarity on the expectations of executives at different levels. It sets a consistent basis for classifying executive positions in public entities into one of three bands, based on work value factors.
2. The Victorian Public Entity Executive Classification framework (the Framework) is the first step in a process that will deliver consistency in executive classification across Victoria’s public entities, improving executive mobility and attraction of candidates.
3. The introduction of the Framework is in the context of the wider reforms to the executive cohort of the Victorian public sector. It has been adapted from the Victorian Public Service (VPS) Executive Classification Framework which is currently being implemented in VPS departments and their connected service agencies.
4. A public entity executive classification framework is required as it will inform the Victorian Independent Remuneration Tribunal’s (VIRT) determination of public entity executive remuneration bands. VIRT is required by legislation to make the determination, which is scheduled to take effect in March 2020.
Key elements 5. The key elements of the Victorian Public Entity Executive Classification Framework include:
the introduction of a three-tier public entity executive classification band structure,
where Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 1 (PESES-1) is the lowest band and
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 3 (PESES-3) is the highest band;
alignment of the new PESES bands with the VPS Senior Executive Service (SES)
bands, where SES-1 (currently EO3) is the lowest classification and SES-3 (currently
EO1) is the highest classification, thus supporting greater mobility between the service
and the sector and with other jurisdictions, and improving the sector’s ability to attract and
retain high performing executives;
a methodology for evaluating the degree of complexity and responsibility associated with
a position to support an assessment of where that position sits in the new PESES band
structure; and
acknowledgement of the diversity of public entity Chief Executive Officers (or equivalent
positions) in the classification approach.
6. Acknowledging the diverse nature of public entities, and unlike the VPS executive classification framework on which this framework is based, it is not proposed to include a provision for standard position titles.
2
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Classification methodology 7. The Framework uses a methodology where positions are assessed and scored against eight
factors which reflect the range of competencies and accountabilities with which executives working in the public sector are typically engaged.
Each position is allocated a point score on a scale of 1 to 7 for each factor, where scores increase in relation to the associated increase in complexity and responsibilities, with a clear differentiation in scoring rationale across the three bands.
The accumulated scores for the eight factors reflects the overall work value for the position and determines in which of the three PESES bands the position sits.
The eight competencies and accountabilities are:
knowledge;
relationships;
judgement and risk;
independence;
strategic change;
breadth;
impact; and
resource management.
3
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
1 Overview 1.1 Purpose The Victorian Public Entity Executive Classification Framework provides clarity on the expectations of executives at different levels. It sets a consistent and transparent basis for classifying public entity executive positions into one of three bands, using a methodology which scores the work value of a given position.
1.2 Scope This framework applies to the classification of all public entity executive positions, including current, new and vacant positions. The definition of an executive, which is from the Public Entity Executive Remuneration policy, is an employee of a public entity who1:
is the Chief Executive Officer (however titled) of a public entity, OR
receives a TRP equal to or greater than the base of the Victorian Public Service (VPS) executive officer remuneration range; AND
has significant management responsibility, that is, the primary role of the employee is to
provide leadership and strategic direction for other staff members.
There is a broad range of work value amongst public entity Chief Executive Officers which requires a framework that can accommodate this diversity as outlined in 1.5 below.
1.3 Design The Framework provides:
a clear methodology for classifying positions and a good foundation for classification decisions;
an assessment methodology that is easy to understand, simple to use, and that can be applied to
executive positions across the public entities.
The framework has been refined from the Victorian Public Service Executive Classification Framework
and as far as possible aligns to that framework in the interests of improving consistency between the
public service and public entities.
1.4 Executive classification bands There are three public entity executive classification bands: PESES-1, PESES-2 and PESES-3. The
band classification of a position is determined by the following:
level of accountability;
complexity of work undertaken and the associated knowledge required;
management and oversight of subordinates;
associated risk; and,
1 For the avoidance of doubt, the following are not public entity executives for the purpose of this framework:
staff whose remuneration rates are specified by an award or enterprise agreement, OR technical specialists who meet the remuneration criteria for a public entity executive, but do not have a people
management function, OR statutory or prerogative office holders appointed to public entities, OR VPS executives employed under Part 3 of the PAA, including by virtue of a specific legislative reference or an
order/instrument made under legislation.
4
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
authority to make decisions, form policy and/or provide advice and recommendations within the
organisation and to other public sector stakeholders.
1.5 Chief Executive Officers Chief Executive Officers, or equivalent positions (CEO) of Victorian public entities can lead
organisations with as few as five staff to entities which employ thousands. They represent approximately
10 per cent of the public entity executive workforce.
Acknowledging the diversity of CEO positions in public entities, the framework has been designed to
allow for a public entity CEO to be assessed as sitting in any one of the three PESES bands. The
position is assessed using the same work value criteria as will be applied to all public entity executive
positions.
In some instances a Chief Executive Officer may be assessed to have a work value below an executive
classification as defined by the framework, but will continue to retain the legislated title of Chief
Executive Officer (or equivalent). An outline of this is presented in Table 1 below, where the full detail of
the methodology can be found in subsequent sections.
Table 1: Chief Executive Officer classifications
Public Entity Chief Executive Officers
Classification assessment
Public entity CEO who does not
meet a PESES band
Public entity CEO in PESES Band 1
Public entity CEO in PESES Band 2
Public entity CEO in PESES Band 3
Framework status
Not classified under this framework
Classified under this framework
Who it applies to
Public entity Chief Executive Officers whose work value score does not meet the threshold for an executive classification under this framework
Public entity Chief Executive Officers who meet the work value score equivalent to PESES-1 (see section 2.3)
Public entity Chief Executive Officers who meet the work value score equivalent to PESES-2 (see section 2.3)
Public entity Chief Executive Officers who meet the work value score equivalent to PESES-3 (see section 2.3)
2 Work value scoring and work streams
2.1 Work value scoring The heart of the Framework is the eight work value factors (WVFs), which are the competencies and
accountabilities generally associated with a public entity executive position and which are summarised
in Table 2 below. The WVFs provide the basis for describing and determining the classification of
executive positions into either of bands PESES 1, 2 or 3.
Table 2: Work value factors
5
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Competency Definition
Knowledge level of required knowledge, skills and expertise; proficiency in a
specialised discipline; level of authority; depth of understanding of the
work environment; whether a source of advice, and to whom
Relationships requirement to influence and negotiate; level, frequency and quantity of
interaction with internal and external stakeholders; assessment of the
sensitivity and complexity of issues and interactions
Judgement and risk the complexity of decision-making and risk assessment and mitigation
associated with the position; degree of uncertainty and ambiguity; criticality
of judgements and risks; the level at which the risk/judgement applies: e.g.
organisational/state/nationwide
Independence the requirement to make decisions without support; authority and freedom
to plan objectives; requirement to contribute to or lead strategic direction
of the entity
Strategic change delivering change; measured by the position’s extent of responsibility for
and level of complexity of significant strategic change management;
contribution to business improvement;
Impact developing the policy frameworks and the strategic direction of the entity;
measured by the scope of the position’s impact internally, into the sector,
across the state or nationally/internationally
Breadth diversity of activities and functions managed by the position; geographical
breadth of responsibility; range of programs, projects and services
managed by the position.
Resource management number of staff and size of resources and budget.
The eight factors do not reflect all the possible components of positions at each band across each and every public entity. Rather they focus on the core components, common to all executive positions, that are considered to reach a classification outcome.
This document should be read in conjunction with the appendices which contain:
1. the detailed descriptors for each factor, along with the differentiated scoring;
2. a tool which summarises how to apply the methodology;
3. a diagram of the process flow for conducting an assessment of an executive position using the Framework; and,
4. an illustration of what a set of assessment outcomes in example organisations could look like.
6
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
2.2 Work value streams The second element that is considered in making a classification recommendation are the tasks and
responsibilities that executives undertake, i.e. to which activities the work value effort in areas such as
knowledge, judgement and risk, strategic change etc are applied. These activities are grouped under
five work value streams which reflect the principle functions of public sector executives. The streams
are summarised in Table 3.
Table 3: Work value streams
Stream Definition
Delivery A principal focus for an executive active in this stream is service
delivery. This may include delivery of services within an organisation,
such as financial, human resource or IT services. Or it could reflect the
position’s responsibility for the delivery of policy objectives within a
sector. This stream would also include many operational positions.
Policy The policy stream relates to policy formulation, implementation and
advice. This might include research and analysis of financial and other
implications and stakeholder views obtained through consultations,
articulation of policy in policy statements, and regulatory or financial
measures and legislation.
Project and Program In this stream, the most significant contribution of positions relates to
the planning, management and ongoing implementation of project and
program initiatives.
Regulatory The most significant contribution of positions in this stream relates to
information gathering and risk assessment and the design and
implementation of compliance and enforcement programs within a
governance framework.
Professional/Specialist The most significant contribution of positions in this stream is the
provision of technical, professional, specialist, or strategic advice at a
significant level of complexity with associated substantial risk and
accountability for high impact outcomes. Advice is core to an entity’s
business and has a primary influence on the entity’s adopted strategies,
plans and targets.
Although any given executive position may incorporate many of these elements, the position will likely
have a more significant contribution in one or two work streams.
Determining the work value stream or streams for a position is not a scored exercise. Rather it can be
helpful to validate the position’s band determination. The full work stream descriptors in Appendix 2
differentiate between the bands based on the complexity and responsibility of the functions performed.
For example, where a position has been provisionally classified following the work value assessment as
meeting PESES Band 2 and is identified as active primarily in the delivery stream, the assessor can
7
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
refer to the delivery descriptor for an executive working at SES Band 2 level and confirm that the
position aligns.
2.3 Work value assessment outcomes The assessment of a position will produce a score which determines the appropriate classification
outcome. Table 4 shows the differentiation of scores across the three bands.
Table 4: Public Entity Senior Executive Service Classification Bands
Classification Score
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 1 21 to 35
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 2 36 to 47
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 3 48 to 56
Following the evaluation process there are several possible classification outcomes. In all
circumstances it is for the Public Entity Head or the Board, where appropriate, to make the final decision
on outcomes.
Where a position aligns to an entity’s current executive structure, no action is needed. For positions
where implementation of the outcome would result in a different executive alignment, Table 5 below
outlines the potential actions for consideration by the public entity Head.
An organisation may choose to not take immediate action and instead re-design a position after it
becomes vacant. If the position holds a substantive executive employee, the decision can be
implemented during the term of the substantive employee’s employment contract, or immediately
following the expiry of said contract.
8
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Table 5: Options for work value assessment outcomes
Possible outcome Possible action
‘Borderline’ (position sits at the edge of a classification, either at the top or the bottom of a band)
The entity Head may decide to:
1) re-examine the position, drawing on assessment information gathered and any new information sources;
2) add or remove tasks or responsibilities to create a better fit of the position in its current classification in the entity’s executive structure; and/or
3) reclassify the position
Under classified
(position assessment results in a higher alignment relative to the executive structure than previously)
The entity Head may decide to:
1) remove certain tasks and responsibilities or accountabilities to lower the work value of a position to create a better fit of the position to its current alignment; or
2) reclassify the position.
Over classified
(position assessment results in a lower alignment relative to the executive structure than previously)
NB: This could include positions which score less than 21 points and therefore fall below the threshold to meet an executive classification
The entity Head may decide to:
1) add certain tasks and responsibilities or accountabilities to raise the work value of a position to create a better fit of the position to its current alignment; or
2) reclassify the position.
9
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Executive Classification Framework Resources A1 Work value scoring tool
1.1 Purpose These materials support the process to define the work value of a public entity executive position and
assign it to one of the three executive bands, providing a consistent and transparent framework for
classifying executives working in Victorian public entities.
1.2 Work value assessment methodology These detailed descriptors for the eight competencies and accountabilities are set out in the following
pages.
The assessment methodology is designed to be straightforward for organisations and HR practitioners
to apply. To conduct an assessment the assessor would proceed as follows (Appendix 3 below outlines
the process for a typical assessment workflow):
using the intelligence about the position which was gathered during the review of corporate
documents and interviews (where applicable), the assessor chooses the set of descriptors which
most closely match the information about the position
the assessor allocates the relevant score for each descriptor
the combined score will sit within a range indicating the appropriate executive classification, as
set out in the table below
Classification Score
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 1 21 to 35
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 2 36 to 47
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 3 48 to 56
The assessor has a choice of four scores for each factor: 1, 3, 5 or 7, each relating to the level of responsibility and complexity required to meet the level for that factor. Intermediate scores of 2, 4 or 6 can also be used in instances where a position fits some but not all of the descriptors of the higher level score.
10
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
As a guide:
if the position consistently scored a 3 across all factors it would sit in PESES Band 1, with a score of 24
a consistent score of 5 would equate to PESES Band 2
scores of 7 would equate to the top of PESES Band 3
In practice there would likely be a range of scores for each position, reflecting the particular focus of that position. For example, an executive whose main responsibility is in the area of regulation, would potentially have the highest scores in judgement and risk and knowledge, and a lower score for resource management.
1.3 Principles of evaluation The classification assessment evaluates the requirements of the position and not the incumbent. It is not an assessment of the incumbent’s performance or strengths, nor can it consider the specific expertise the incumbent may bring to the position.
The classification level for each factor should be determined by the highest level at which the position operates on a regular basis, taking into consideration that no less than 70 per cent of the work undertaken by the role for a given factor must equal the work value of that level. For example, an occasional meeting with the entity Head, or a one-off briefing of a minister would be insufficient to score the position a 5 for the Relationships factor, where interaction with stakeholders is usually at a more junior level for that position.
For a position to meet a factor level the assessor should be able to provide clear rationale supporting the decision and examples that illustrate where the position matches the descriptor.
Positions may sit anywhere within the assessed band range. This reflects the diversity of positions within each classification level, with more diversity expected at the lower levels and a wider band range at those levels to accommodate the greater diversity.
11
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
1.4 Work value assessment tool
Knowledge factor
1 3 5 7
Apply knowledge and skills in a field or
discipline acquired through substantial
professional, technical or management
experience.
Be considered a source of well-
developed, complex advice in a specific
and/or narrow area of expertise.
Use knowledge of structures, the sector
and the organisation to develop policies
and new program or project initiatives.
Apply comprehensive knowledge and
skills, acquired through formal (tertiary)
training or relevant professional,
technical or management experience.
Be considered an authoritative source
of strategic advice and expertise which
has influence on organisational
decision-making in an area of
knowledge or practice.
Apply a highly developed understanding
of policy, service delivery, regulatory,
and/or legislative processes gained
through experience in public or private
sector management or specialist
positions, with commensurate
understanding of the social, political,
environmental and economic contexts,
including statewide, national or
international matters in a specific area
of expertise.
Apply extensive knowledge and skills,
acquired through formal (tertiary)
training or relevant significant
professional, specialist or management
experience, including knowledge and
skills over a broad range of activities or
deep technical/specialist knowledge
pursuant to a senior expert in a field.
Act as an authoritative source of critical
advice which impacts organisational
decision-making in a large portion of the
organisation, or the whole of a smaller
organisation.
Apply a strategic, extensive
understanding of policy, service
delivery, regulatory, and/or legislative
processes gained through significant
experience in public or private sector
senior management, with
commensurate understanding of the
social, political, environmental and
economic contexts, including statewide,
national or international matters across
one or more functions, specialisations
or areas of practice.
Provide whole-of-organisation
leadership through advanced
knowledge and skills, acquired from
extensive professional or executive
management experience.
Apply cumulative knowledge and
extensive expertise to a broad and
diverse area of responsibility that
encompasses a large portion, or the
whole of, an organisation.
Provide highly complex, strategic and
critical advice in relation to issues that
impact on policy, services and
programs, and act as the principal
source of strategic advice for
organisational decision-making on
which the organisation or the sector is
dependent.
Act as the major source of advice to the
Board, Ministers and/or senior sector
stakeholders and set the parameters
under which others advise.
12
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Relationships Factor
1 3 5 7
Initiate and maintain
effective relationships with
a broad range of internal
and external stakeholders.
Initiate and manage
negotiations with peers
(internal and external to
work unit) to gain
commitment to projects,
and delivery of activities to
meet timelines.
Represent own work area
with external stakeholders,
and effectively manage
feedback.
Represent the organisation
with external peers and
negotiate within agreed
parameters.
Liaise and consult with
stakeholders during times
of change, resolving issues
and meeting expectations.
Facilitate and lead relationships; liaise,
engage and influence internal and
external stakeholders in relation to a
specific area of responsibility. Negotiate
outcomes, enlist cooperation, consult and
resolve conflict while maintaining
relationships and collaborative networks.
Develop and maintain effective senior
relationships with government and sector
stakeholders, industry and/or the
community to integrate and coordinate
policy, regulation, and delivery of
services. Regularly interact, liaise and
engage with senior management and/or
the Chair of the organisation, external
stakeholders and ministerial advisors in
order to influence and persuade.
Participate as a member or chair of a
range of committees, working groups and
other fora, including inter-organisation
groups and industry/community sector
groups, and represent the organisation at
conferences, meetings and seminars.
Engage stakeholders during times of
change, resolving conflict and managing
sensitivities within constrained
timeframes.
Lead and oversee critical stakeholder
engagement, including the need to engage,
inform and advise a diverse range of very
senior stakeholders in relation to highly
complex issues.
Negotiate major outcomes and provide
persuasive advice in the face of divergent
views or conflicting agendas while maintaining
strong relationships and collaborative networks
with key stakeholders at senior levels across
the sector and government.
Provide highly influential, strategic advice to
the organisation Chair, departments and
ministers, and, where relevant, advocate for a
position or viewpoint.
Participate as a member or chair on a range of
committees, working groups and other fora,
including inter-organisation groups and
industry/community sector groups, and
represent the organisation in negotiations.
Engage and manage stakeholders through
change, resolving conflict and managing
sensitivities in a complex environment.
Lead and oversee highly critical stakeholder
engagement, including the need to engage,
inform and advise a diverse range of very
senior and highly influential stakeholders in
relation to extremely complex, high-profile,
high-risk, and sensitive issues.
Negotiate major outcomes and provide
persuasive advice in the face of divergent
views or conflicting agendas, while
maintaining strong relationships and
collaborative networks across government
and non-government sectors at the highest
levels.
Have the authority to present and negotiate
highly contentious issues, with technical,
policy and/or legal complexity, and
represent the organisation at the national
and international level.
Chair or act as a senior member of a range
of critical stakeholder groups and
committees.
Lead stakeholder relationships through
complex change, resolving conflict and
managing contextual and political
sensitivities.
13
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Judgement and Risk Factor
1 3 5 7
Apply good judgement to solve
problems through the application of
established techniques, methods,
systems or policies.
Undertake analysis and
interpretation in choosing a course
of action to manage complex or
sensitive issues within the sphere of
responsibility.
Identify and respond to new and
emerging issues impacting on the
operating environment and maintain
awareness of current developments
in the field of work, responding
appropriately to mitigate risk.
Apply astute judgement in
decision-making about issues affecting
the organisation with sensitivity to issues
impacting the organisation and across
the sector. Make effective judgements
under pressure, consider alternative
courses of action, devise action plans
and advocate new approaches to
complex issues.
Resolve problems, taking account of
established management systems,
professional standards, budget
parameters or known equipment
capacity.
Make judgements and assess risk under
guidance provided by policy, service
delivery and/or regulatory frameworks,
guidelines and precedents.
Identify, anticipate and manage complex
risk, undertaking risk mitigation and
management activities to ensure the
achievement of business unit and
organisational goals.
Make judgements and assess risk in
the context of uncertainty and
innovation. Apply lateral thinking and
develop innovative solutions that
impact onto the area of responsibility
and influence decision-making across
the organisation.
Identify, anticipate and manage highly
complex issues and problems.
Develop strategic risk-minimisation
plans and risk frameworks using
guidance that is less defined within the
context of broad policy, service
delivery and/or regulatory frameworks,
priorities and strategic direction. Use
robust investigation to consider a wide
range of alternative courses of action
in highly complex and sensitive
situations.
Identify and take into account
emerging statewide and national
issues and formulate long-term plans
to mitigate risk. Be aware of the
international context where relevant.
Make judgements and assess very complex
risk in the context of uncertainty and
innovation. Give guidance on the
development of new policy frameworks and
make judgements about the integration of
information provided by specialists.
Focus on whole-of-organisation and whole-
of-sector issues that are usually sensitive
and/or contentious and which impact across
the sector and into government, industry
and/or the wider community in situations
where there is an absence of guidelines or
precedents, and where analysis requires
very complex investigation.
Identify critical long-term risks and
strategies for mitigating these in the context
of significant ambiguity, including making
judgements about the appropriateness and
integrity of legislation, policy, service
standards and regulation.
Set or influence emerging statewide or
national issues and formulate long-term
plans, with an astute understanding of
where the organisation interacts with the
wider public policy agenda and take the
international context into account.
14
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Independence Factor
1 3 5 7
Work under broad direction with
autonomy in setting priorities,
developing work programs and
determining how work is done for the
team.
Make decisions that may affect the day-
to-day operation of the work area and/or
have a direct impact on the outcome of
a program or major project.
Provide analysis and authoritative
recommendations to more senior
colleagues.
Have broad decision-making authority
in relation to the management of the
work area, including staffing, and
financial management.
Make decisions that impact other areas
of the organisation, with the potential to
flow into other sectors or industry in the
short to medium term.
Exercise the authority to approve
decisions and recommendations of
others within the area of responsibility
and provide recommendations to
higher-level senior management and/or
organisation Chair, which are relied
upon in wider organisational decision
making.
Exercise high level delegations in
relation to legal, governance, human
resource management, project and
program, and regulatory decisions for a
discrete number of functions.
Create and implement annual business
plans and adopt a 2 to 3-year horizon,
ensuring alignment with whole-of
organisation planning.
Work with a high level of independence
and the freedom to make critical
decisions about the way in which goals
are achieved and priorities are defined.
Make decisions that impact other areas
of the organisation, or the whole of a
smaller organisation, and flow into the
wider sector, government or industry in
the medium to long term with the
authority to make statements on behalf
of the organisation. Work with a high
level of credibility in the area of
responsibility.
Exercise high level delegations in
relation to legal, governance, human
resource management, project and
program, and regulatory decisions for a
range of functions. For a smaller
organisation, may include the authority
to make statements and decisions on
behalf of the organisation.
Adopt a 2 to 3-year focus for planning
with an understanding of longer term
implications where applicable. Act with
full accountability for integration of
strategic policy, regulatory, service
delivery and/or program initiatives.
Work with significant independence and
freedom to make critical decisions
about the way in which goals are
achieved and priorities are defined for
the whole organisation, or a substantial
part of a very large organisation.
Make decisions that impact all areas of
the organisation, and flow into the wider
sector, government or industry in the
long term.
Exercise the authority to make
statements and decisions on behalf of
the organisation and have a very high
level of credibility.
Exercise full delegated authority for
management of a major component or
an organisation’s full functions or
programs and provide a governance
focus that is fundamental to the
organisation’s performance in delivering
policy or program outcomes.
Adopt a 3 to 5-year focus for planning
with an understanding of longer-term
implications where applicable. Be fully
accountable for the integration of
strategic policy, regulatory, service
delivery and program initiatives.
15
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Strategic Change Factor
1 3 5 7
Manage change projects associated
with organisational reform and
implement change in the work area.
Respond to a changing operating
environment, including relevant
contextual variables.
Contribute to strategic change
management within an organisation,
including longer term planning for major change initiatives.
Manage change and take
responsibility for continuous
improvement processes within the
business area.
Regularly monitor and respond
to a changing operating and/or
policy environment, working with
an understanding of the relevant
context and emerging social, political,
environmental and technological
change.
Provide a significant contribution to
strategic change management within
an organisation, including longer term planning for major change initiatives, and/or changes in the strategic, long- term vision of an organisation.
Manage change projects and programs that constitute a major piece of work over an extended timeframe and where this is the primary responsibility of the position.
Regularly manage change associated with critical or large-scale reforms.
Identify and coordinate responses
to widely impacting organisational
change, working with a strategic
understanding of the relevant
context and emerging social, political, environmental and technological issues.
Oversee multiple, integrated change
initiatives with outcomes that have a
significant impact on communities,
stakeholders and services, or undertake the management of large-scale change projects and programs that constitute a significant piece of work over an extended timeframe and where this is the primary responsibility of the position.
Regularly manage change associated with highly critical or very large-scale reforms which impact beyond the organisation into the wider sector.
Regularly identify and coordinate
responses to change, working with a
strategic understanding of the relevant context and emerging social, political, environmental and technological issues.
Oversee complex, multiple,
integrated change initiatives in
the context of innovation, political
sensitivity and high levels of risk or
undertake the management of very
large-scale change projects and
programs that constitute a highly
significant piece of work over an
extended timeframe and where this is the primary responsibility of the position.
Manage change in an environment
of innovation with impact across the sector and community-wide.
16
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Impact Factor
1 3 5 7
Develop policy frameworks within area
of expertise or responsibility based on
defined organisational priorities and
provide advice to senior management
and/or organisation Chair.
Develop policies, programs and
initiatives that impact on programs or
major functional areas within the
organisation.
Contribute to business unit planning
and develop direction for the team.
Lead a team and contribute to the
organisation’s impact into industry, or
the sector, through involvement with a
range of external bodies and groups.
Influence policy and strategic
direction of an organisation through
contribution to organisation
leadership, the organisation Chair,
Secretaries and ministers where
required.
Have some impact into industry or
the wider community through
ensuring the effective delivery of
services and/or through engagement
with sector and government bodies,
external peak bodies, groups and
associations at an equivalent level.
Contribute to the organisation’s
strategic planning as a member or
leader of the senior executive, and
take full responsibility for developing
the strategic direction for the
business unit, ensuring elements
integrate to support higher
organisational strategic goals.
Strongly influence policy and strategic
direction of an organisation through
membership of the executive leadership
and contribute to organisation-wide goals.
Engage, inform and advise Secretaries and
ministers as required.
Have impact into industry or the wider
community through oversight of the delivery
of major services and/or through leading
engagement with external peak bodies,
groups and associations at senior levels.
Contribute to shaping the organisation’s
strategic vision as a member of the senior
executive and take full responsibility for
developing the strategic direction for the
area of responsibility, integrating a range of
activities, programs and functions to
support organisational goals and priorities.
When supporting the work of an
organisation through the provision of
corporate services or the setting of
overarching policy and regulatory
frameworks, actions and decisions will
impact across the organisation as a whole.
Lead policy development and the
strategic vision of an organisation
through membership, or as head of,
the executive leadership. Routinely
provide very high-level, strategic and
critical consultancy through
engagement across the sector and
with Government at Secretary and
ministerial level
Have impact into the sector, industry or
the wider community, through leading
engagement with external peak
bodies, groups and associations at the
most senior levels.
Be accountable for leading the
development of the organisation’s
strategic vision and direction,
integrating a range of activities,
programs and functions to achieve
organisational goals and priorities.
Lead initiatives that impact statewide
and/or that may influence policy and
program development nationally or
internationally.
17
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Breadth Factor
1 3 5 7
Have responsibility for a broad range of
activities, or services within a specific
area of expertise.
Manage staff and activities that are not
geographically dispersed but are co-
located such as a regional office or
team.
Be responsible for a wide range of
activities that relate to an area of
responsibility or, in a smaller
organisation, a number of areas of
responsibility.
Manage staff and/or activities that may
be geographically dispersed such as
across offices in different parts of a city,
or that occur in offices in regional areas.
Be responsible for an extensive range
of activities that relate to a specific
major function such as human resource
management, ICT or financial services
in a larger organisation, or a number of
functions that are interrelated and of
high complexity such as both policy and
program responsibilities. Operate within
multiple frames of reference and have
accountability for a number of business
areas.
Manage staff and/or functions that are
geographically dispersed such as
across offices in different parts of a city,
or offices in regional areas.
Lead multiple functions in a large
organisation or manage all functions
within a small or medium sized
organisation. Operate within multiple
frames of reference and have
accountability for a number of
integrated functions or operations.
Manage staff and/or functions that are
widely geographically dispersed,
including management of a number of
regional offices and/or functions that are
delivered regionally.
18
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Resource Management Factor
1 3 5 7
Oversee the work of fewer than 20 staff
and/or expenditure under $10m pa
Oversee the work of 20 to 100 staff
and/or expenditure between $10m and
$100m pa
Oversee the work of 100 to 1,000 staff
and/or expenditure between $100m and
$1b pa
Oversee the work of more than 1,000
staff and/or expenditure above $1b pa
Manage the staff and resources of a
team or work area, or for the whole of a
very small organisation.
Manage a resource base which may
include operational, capital, and/or
project/program/grants funding and be
responsible for the development of
budgets and expenditure within area of
responsibility.
Manage the staff and resources of a
portion of an organisation, such as a
business unit/branch or the whole of a
smaller organisation.
Manage a resource base which may
include operational, capital and/or
project/program/grants funding and be
accountable for the development and
management of budgets, finances,
procurement and expenditure within a
business unit/branch.
Manage the staff and resources of a
division/group or set of business units
within an organisation, or the whole of a
smaller organisation.
Manage a large resource base which
may include operational, capital and/or
project/program/grants funding,
tactically balancing resources across
areas of responsibility.
Be accountable for the development
and management of budgets, finances,
procurement and expenditure for a
division/group or set of business units
and influence the allocation of
resources over the long term.
Manage a substantial proportion of the
staff and resources of a larger
organisation or manage the whole of a
smaller one.
Manage a very large resource base
which may include operational, capital
and/or program funding across multiple
areas of responsibility or for a whole
organisation.
Be accountable for the development
and management of budgets, finances,
procurement and expenditure for a
substantial portion of an organisation
and plan the allocation of resources
over the long term.
19
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
A2 Work value stream descriptors by band
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 1 (PESES-1) work streams Positions at this level lead and manage in one or more of the functional streams below and may undertake any of the following tasks and responsibilities:
Delivery Provide comprehensive, authoritative advice and expertise in relation to the effective delivery of services
Lead and manage a business unit responsible for effective delivery of services
Oversee the management of contracts in relation to the delivery of services and provision of regular performance and compliance reports in
accordance with specified standards, terms and conditions
Manage one or more of a range of functions to deliver services to staff of an organisation, including HR services, financial services, and ICT
services
Ensure the effective delivery of services to a range of customer bases, including specialist services
Oversee the development, measurement and analysis of customer service standards, systems and processes to ensure continuation of a high
level service culture
20
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Policy Lead the development and review of policy and implement policy frameworks within area of responsibility
Review policy drafted by others for sign-off
Maintain policy frameworks
Monitor legislative context and ensure policies align with changes or implementation of new legislation
Develop and review draft papers and briefs for presentation to more senior staff or organisation Chair for circulation outside the organisation
and into the sector
Liaise with government, industry sectors, community and other stakeholder groups in relation to legislative and policy direction and
development
Negotiate policy outcomes and options with a range of internal and external stakeholders
Project & Program
Assume responsibility for a project of large scale or major program significance
Lead organisational business unit in implementing programs, major projects and initiatives
Liaise across the organisation to build collaborative approaches to project and program initiatives
Assume overall project/program delivery responsibility, including the co-ordination of resources and expertise and maintaining project/program
within agreed policy, project specification and budgetary constraints.
Report regularly on progress of projects to the organisation Chair and relevant project steering committees; recommend action, identify and
refer major policy issues.
Ensure that each project complies at all stages of implementation with organisation financial, social, budgetary, audit and procurement policies
and probity requirements.
21
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Regulatory Lead a business unit that is responsible for compliance, enforcement, audit, investigation and/or regulatory policy
Contribute to the development and maintenance of governance frameworks
Oversee the implementation of compliance programs, including audit and investigation activities
Oversee intelligence programs, managing risk and assessing threat
Be responsible for high-level delegations in relation to compliance and enforcement decisions
Oversee and manage complex compliance, investigation and enforcement activities, applying significant work knowledge and established
legislation and policy to sensitive situations
Liaise, engage and negotiate with key stakeholders to establish standards, policy, and precedent in a regulatory environment
Professional / Specialist
Act as a chief point of professional advice to key stakeholders within and outside the organisation
Show intellectual leadership by providing specialist input to policies, new legislation, program reform and business improvement initiatives
Provide specialist expertise and professional knowledge and skill in relation to specific areas of organisational responsibility
Oversee a business unit performing specialist or technical work in a profession or area of practice
Engage with and participate in relevant professional bodies and associations to ensure information exchange and continuing professional
development
Oversee the provision of specialist and technical training and the development of education products in a technical or specialist field, including
guidelines, manuals, policies and processes
22
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 2 (PESES-2) work streams Positions at this level lead and provide direction in one or more of the functional streams below and may undertake any of the following tasks and
responsibilities:
Delivery Provide expert, high level authoritative advice and expertise in relation to the planning, establishment and implementation of services
Establish, lead and direct the delivery of services, products and systems
Lead and manage a group of business units that undertake service delivery in one or more specified areas
Oversee one or more of a range of functions to deliver services to staff of an organisation, including human resources services, financial
services, and information and communication technology services
Provide strategic management and corporate direction to the provision of portfolio support and advice services, policy development and
implementation and leadership in the delivery of services
Continually monitor and review current systems and practices and develop innovative strategies for the realisation of organisation priorities
and goals
23
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Policy Lead the development and review of policy frameworks over a range of policy areas, including highly complex and sensitive contexts
Ensure that policy frameworks and accompanying policy documents align with organisational plans and objectives
Lead and manage a group of business units undertaking policy functions in a range of generalist or speciality areas
Provide expert and high-level advice to organisation chair, heads of other bodies and/or Ministers as appropriate, in relation to a range of
policy development and review
Engage and consult with senior sector and government stakeholders, community and other stakeholder representatives to achieve
consensus in critical areas
Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of policy initiatives and provide advice regarding social and economic impacts of policy changes or
new policy
Portfolio & Program
Lead the strategic implementation of programs and initiatives
Take full accountability for major projects
Undertake program development and planning, including resource negotiation
Initiate new programs and be responsible for major change initiatives
Provide leadership on a range of cross-functional project teams and taskforces designed to deliver breakthrough outcomes critical to the
integrated delivery of programs across an organisation
Provide leadership and direction on matters associated with financial, budget and output management, strategic and business planning,
particularly for evidence-based new initiative proposals
24
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Regulatory Establish and maintain strong and effective governance and regulatory frameworks
Provide leadership and strategic management for a group of business units that are responsible for regulatory activities
Oversee the development and implementation of intelligence and compliance programs, including audit and investigation activities
Oversee very complex compliance, investigation and enforcement activities, applying significant work knowledge and established legislation
and policy to highly sensitive situations
Lead engagement and negotiation with non-government and government stakeholders to ensure regulatory objectives are met
Provide leadership and strategic management for a diverse range of infringement and enforcement services
Professional / Specialist
Act as the chief point of professional advice to critical stakeholders within and outside the organisation
Provide expert advice on specialist and technical issues to the organisation Chair, requiring considerable depth and breadth of knowledge
and experience in a complex, professional field
Show intellectual leadership by providing specialist input that shapes the development of policies, new legislation, program reform, and
underlying infrastructure
Provide specialist expertise and professional knowledge and skill in relation to highly complex and critical areas of importance for the
organisation
Oversee a group of business units performing specialist or technical work in a profession or area of practice
Engage with and participate in relevant professional bodies and associations to ensure information exchange and continuing professional
development
25
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Public Entity Senior Executive Service Band 3 (PESES-3) work streams Positions at this level provide leadership and strategic vision in one or more of the following functional streams:
Delivery Lead the development of service delivery strategy and new initiatives, and manage large-scale strategic change with substantial impact
on service delivery models and implementation
Oversee and manage service delivery issues that are highly sensitive and extremely complex to ensure that critical risks are minimised
Lead and promote a culture of innovation and adaptability, taking into account leading edge technology, best practice approaches and
key strategic service delivery outcomes
Policy Provide thought and corporate leadership to matters of strategic planning, quality management strategies, governance, establishing
organisational priorities and direction, and contribute as applicable to the development of key government policies
Provide highly complex, strategic, expert advice to ensure the development of evidence-based policy frameworks, recommendations
and decisions
Lead and maintain long-term strategic partnerships with critical government, industry and community stakeholders at the highest level
to inform policy construction
Portfolio and Program
Lead the development of new program initiatives and manage large-scale strategic change with substantial program impact
Direct the implementation, review and evaluation of programs, set expectations and performance standards at a whole-of-organisation
level
Drive program evaluation frameworks and program planning to ensure return on investment at a financial, human resources and
infrastructure level
Regulatory make determinations regarding the application of regulatory interpretations, ensuring the integrity of legislative systems
Drive the development and implementation of regulatory frameworks and substantial, highly complex regulatory programs, ensuring
alignment with organisational vision and consistent with community and government expectations
Lead and manage responses to highly complex regulatory, enforcement, and compliance issues, managing and mitigating risk,
including financial, reputational, and safety risks
Oversee a substantial portion of an organisation, or whole organisation that is responsible for regulatory, compliance and/or
enforcement activities, including policy and delivery
26
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
Professional / Specialist
As a specialist, provide strategic and critical advice based on extensive and advanced professional and technical experience in a
highly complex field
Drive the development of specialist knowledge, through the leadership of a significant portion, or whole, of an organisation, undertaking
specialist functions, including the delivery of professional services, education services, research and analysis, and the provision of
highly complex professional advice and information
27
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
A3 Classification Process workflow
STAGE 1Gather corporate
documents
STAGE 2 Conduct Interview
STAGE 3 Score the position
STAGE 4Produce Findings
Report
make a classification
recommendation of where the position sits in the three‐band PESES structure
produce a findings report for the entity
Head
STAGE 5Implementation
Decision
validate information from previous step;
probe as required
understand the position’s role within the organisation
Half a day 1‐1.5 hours Half a dayApprox 6 hours for
3‐8 positionsTime
Action
Purposeentity Head decides how and when to align outcomes
Alignment of outcomes
Detail
Stages 1‐3 for each position (supervisor interview at Stage 2 can cover multiple reports)
Stages 4‐5 once only for whole
organisation
For example: position
description annual report strategic plan committee
memberships
incumbent, or previous
position holder
PLUS validation interview with supervisor as necessary
assess the eight competency and accountability criteria using
scoring template; validate against applicable work
streams
moderation of all assessment outcomes to
produce a high level overview and make recommendations
entity Head to consider next steps, including timing of any classification amendments and potential impact on remuneration and executive structure
FIGURE 1 - CLASSIFICATION PROCESS WORKFLOW
28
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
FIGURE 2 - CONCEPT OF ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES FOR THREE EXAMPLE ENTITIES
A4 Concept of possible assessment outcomes
Figure 2 provides an example of what work value assessment outcomes could look like for entities of different sizes. In all cases it is assumed that the CEO will be assessed with having the highest work value and the subordinate executives will therefore be assessed at lower work values . These assessments would be used to inform remuneration outcomes with reference to guidance from the Victorian Independent Remuneration Tribunal on how to determine a final remuneration value (to be developed).