15
Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety January 2014 VanderbiltHealth.com/Orthopaedics (615) 93-ORTHO Vanderbilt Department of Orthopaedics

Vanderbilt Department of Orthopaedics...Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety January 2014 A Message from the Chairman, Herbert Schwartz, MD The compelling need for a good

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety January 2014

    VanderbiltHealth.com/Orthopaedics(615) 93-ORTHO

    Vanderbilt Department of Orthopaedics

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety January 2014

    A Message from the Chairman, Herbert Schwartz, MDThe compelling need for a good definition of health care value highlights a fundamentalchallenge. We have not yet developed scientifically sound or accepted approaches todefining or measuring either patient centered outcomes of care, or the costs ofproducing those outcomes. The scientific hurdles to defining patient centered outcomesare numerous. Outcomes can be subtle and multidimensional, involving not onlyphysiological and functional results, but also patients’ perceptions and valuations oftheir care and health status. The ability of health care organizations to measure costs isprimitive at best and doesn’t meet the standards used in many other advancedindustries. Equally challenging is the lack of data systems to support outcomemeasurement.

    The Vanderbilt Department of Orthopaedics (VDO) presents this compilation of Value, Quality and Safety astestimony to our mission, accomplishments and culture. The Divisions within VDO have proudly displayedsome examples of the programs conducted in 2013 which document our commitment to value in health care.Value can be defined as: Quality Patient Outcomes, Safety and Satisfaction divided by Cost, Waste Reductionand Operational Redesign. We strive to deliver the very best care for our patients, as per our credo of puttingthe patient first, by performing evidence based medicine whenever appropriate and setting examples of thatbehavior for our residents, alumni and colleagues.

    At Vanderbilt, the promise of discovery is our passion. Teamwork within VDO is fundamental and each teammember is critical in facilitating a constantly evolving and improved product. We emphasize patient’s rightsand the sanctity and privacy of the patient – doctor relationship. We use our data management systems tosupport our discovery of best practices and apply them to the individual based upon their needs. Our teamtries to focus on optimal access and care delivery while minimizing the distractions of poor metric proxies ofperformance. We must be mindful in our changing healthcare environment that we maintain our focus ondelivering the care to our patients that they need.

    Please enjoy reviewing our march toward delivering value based health care.

    Best Wishes in the New Year,

    Herbert S. Schwartz MDProfessor and ChairmanVanderbilt Department of OrthopaedicsMCE South Tower, Suite 4200Nashville, TN 37232 8774Phone: 615.322 0543, Fax: 615.875 [email protected]

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Joint Replacement Outcomes Report 2013

    Total Joint ReplacementsInfec on and complica on rates a er total joint replacements con nue to remain below na onal standards, as compared to other

    large, ter ary centers (de iden fied) as seen in the data obtained from University HealthSystem Consor um (UHC).

    Primary total knee replacement remains the most commonprocedure performed by the Joint Replacement Center,

    while primary hip replacement volume con nues to grow.Our center has remained a strong referral center for revision

    hip and knee replacements, as well as infected jointreplacements.

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Vanderbilt Bone and Joint Outcomes Report 2013

    The average length of stay following aprimary joint replacement following the

    accelerated recovery pathway program was2.18 days between November 2012 andJanuary 2013. This average includes 6

    pa ents who chose inpa ent rehabilita onwhich requires at minimum a 3 night

    hospital stay.

    The average pa ent controlled analgesia (pain medica on usage)among pa ents par cipa ng in the Accelerated Recovery Program(ARP) was nearly half that of the group not par cipa ng in ARP.

    The average number of oral pain tablets (taken as needed for pain) pervisit using a random sample of 30 pa ents. The total overall averageof tablets taken per visit for all of the ARP pa ents was 7 per pa ent.

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Children’s Orthopaedics Outcomes Report 2013

    Pediatric Spinal Fusion Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Improvements

    Surgical site infec on rates for pa ents receiving spinal fusions con nues to decrease. InQuarter 3 of 2011 there were 7 surgical site infec ons for every 100 procedures completed.That number has been reduced to 0 surgical site infec ons for every 100 procedures com-

    pleted in Quarter 3 of 2013.

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Children’s Orthopaedics Outcomes Report 2013

    Pediatric Spinal Fusion Length of Stay Improvements

    Bene its of a shorter length of stay:

    Previously Occurred OnPostop Day:

    Now Occurs On PostopDay:

    Patient is Ordered to BeOut of the Bed 3x/Day

    2 1

    Discontinue patientcontrolled analgesia

    2 or 3 1

    Pain medication taken byMouth

    2 or 3 1

    IV fluids stopped 3 2

    Patients ambulates(moves) 3x/Day

    3 2

    Hemovac drain removal 3 2

    Postoperative Pathway Modifications

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Hand Surgery Outcomes Report 2013

    Outcomes of Hook of the Hamate Fracture Excision in High Level Athletes

    Level of Playat Time of InjurySport

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    3 4 5 6 7 8

    #of

    Patie

    nts

    Weeks

    Return to Sport

    0

    1

    2

    3

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011

    Score

    Patients

    PostoperativeDASH Scores

    DASH Score

    DASH Sports Score

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    Pain

    (010

    )

    Patients

    Pain Scores

    Preoperative

    Postoperative

    02468

    10

    1 2 3 5 67Left

    7Right 8 9 10 11

    Perfo

    rmance

    Score

    Patients

    PerformanceScores

    Preinjury

    Postinjury

    0123456789

    10

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    Satisfaction

    Score(0

    10)

    Patients

    Patient Satisfaction

    Demographics

    Outcomes

    Pain was based on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).Sa sfac on was based on a score of 1 (not sa sfied) to 10 (very sa sfied).

    All pa ents successfully returned to full par cipa on in theirsport an average of 6 weeks a er surgery. Performance inthe pa ent’s respec ve sport was measured on a scale of 1

    (worst possible performance) to 10 (best possibleperformance). A pa ent’s func onal outcome was measuredusing the DASH (Disabili es of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand)ques onnaire and DASH Sports module which uses a scale of1 (no di culty doing specific func on) and 5 (unable to do

    specific func on).

    1 1

    5

    2 2

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    17 18 19 20 21#of

    Patie

    ntsin

    AgeG

    roup

    Age

    Age Range

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Orthopaedic Oncology Outcomes Report 2013

    Surgical Site Infections and Resected Soft Tissue Sarcomas

    Management of Obese Patients with Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas

    35

    10

    35

    10

    2215

    19125

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    Wound Complication Rate Local Recurrence Rate

    Patient%

    Wound Complicationand Local RecurrenceRates

    Toronto 2002 (n=88)

    Boston 2012 (n=103)

    Nagoya 2010 (n=126)

    Vanderbilt 2013 (n=91)

    Obesity WoundComplicationsSarcoma Specific

    Death 1.4 1.28

    Distant Metastatis 0.82 1.11Local Recurrence 0.6 1.42

    00.20.40.60.81

    1.21.41.61.82

    HazardRa

    tio

    Wound Complications and the Obese Patient

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Orthopaedic Oncology Outcomes Report 2013

    Quality Projects on Incomplete Excisions of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

    INSURANCE AND DISTANCE ANALYSIS: Insurance statusand pa ent distance from the treatment center were notsignificantly di erent between pa ents who underwentprimary excision and reexcision of a so ssue sarcoma.However, large and deep tumors and certain histology

    types predicted appropriate referrals.

    COST ANALYSIS: The average professional charge was$9694 for a primary excision and $12896 for a reexcision.A er adjus ng for variables such as: tumor size, grade, andsite, pa ents undergoing reexcision saw an increase of$3,699 in professional charges more than those with a

    primary excision.

    Proposed Flowchart for Avoiding Unplanned Resections of Wrist Sarcomas

    Flowchart of purposed algorithmof diagnos c steps (diamonds)

    and treatment recommenda ons(rectangles) for pa ents

    presen ng with dorsal wrist mass.This algorithm was created tohelp surgeons avoid trea ng

    malignant tumors thought to bedorsal ganglion cysts.

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Report 2013

    Relationship of Hyperglycemia and Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rates

    Stress Induced Hyperglycemia as a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rates

    4

    10

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    Average Length of Stay

    Day

    Average Length of Stay

    ICU

    Hospital

    8.6%

    23%

    0.0%

    5.0%

    10.0%

    15.0%

    20.0%

    25.0%

    Infection Rates

    Surgical SiteInfections

    Infections

    37%

    63%

    4.4% 1.6%0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    More than 1 Less than 1Blood Glucose Level 200mg

    BloodGlucose Levels andSurgical SiteInfections

    Number of Patients

    Thirty day SurgicalSite Infection (SSI)Rate

    17%

    83%

    7.5%1.7%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    HGI 1.76 HGI < 1.76

    Hyperglycemic Index (HGI)and Surgical Site Infections

    Number of Patients

    Thirty day SurgicalSite Infection (SSI)Rate

    62

    36

    86

    56

    20

    Injury TypeUpper Extremity

    Pelvic or Acetabular

    Femur

    Tibia

    Foot

    4.9

    14.9

    02468

    10121416

    Average Blood Transfusion

    Units

    BloodTransfusionUnits and Surgical SiteInfections

    Patients without an SSI

    Patients with an SSI1.2

    2.1

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    Average HGI Level

    Hyperglycemic (HGI) andSurgical Site Infections

    Patients without an SSI

    Patients with an SSI

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Report 2013

    Health Literacy in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients

    0.0%

    10.0%

    20.0%

    30.0%

    40.0%

    50.0%

    60.0%

    70.0%

    80.0%

    90.0%

    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

    Overall Patient PerformanceonComphrensionQuestions

    Pre Intervention (N=146)

    Post Intervention (N=153)

    0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%

    Patient Satisfaction

    Patients withIntervention (N=34)

    Patients with NoIntervention (N=153)

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality & Safety 2014

    Rehabilitation Orthopaedics Outcomes Report 2013

    Over half (56%) of the sampled worker’s compensa onpopula on (n=50) were restricted to light duty for less than 30days. 84% of the pa ents were restricted to light duty for 60

    days or less. The average number of days a worker’scompensa on pa ent was restricted to light duty ranged from19 days for pa ents with foot and ankle injuries to 50 days for

    pa ents su ering from hand injuries.

    51% of 29 worker’s compensa on pa ents sampled were able to return to work following treatment. Over 67% oflumbar spine injury pa ents and 100% of amputa on pa ents were able to return to work.

    The Worker’s Compensation Patient

    0 30 31 60 60 90 >90Cervical 3 3 1 0Lumbar 12 4 2 0Shoulder 0 2 1 0Hand 5 1 2 2Knee 4 3 0 0Foot/Ankle 4 1 0 0

    3 31 0

    12

    42

    002 1 0

    5

    1 2 24 3

    0 0

    4

    1 0 002468

    101214

    Numbe

    rofP

    atients

    Days on Light Duty

    # of Days Restricted to Light Duty

    LumbarSpine Injury Paraplegia

    PelvicInjuries

    ExtremityInjuries Amputations

    CervicalSpineInjuries

    ThoracicSpineInjuries

    MultipleTraumas (NoFractures)

    Returned to Work 4 1 1 5 4 0 0 0Did Not Return to Work 2 2 2 5 0 1 1 1Total Patients 6 3 3 10 4 1 1 1

    41 1

    5 4

    0 0 02 2 2

    5

    0 1 1 1

    63 3

    10

    41 1 1

    02468

    1012

    NumberofPatients

    Return to WorkReturned to Work Did Not Return to Work Total Patients

    34

    27

    48

    50

    24

    19

    Average Days on Light Duty

    Cervical

    Lumbar

    Shoulder

    Hand

    Knee

    Foot/Ankle

  • Vanderbilt Orthopaedics: Value, Quality, & Safety 2014

    Sports Medicine Outcomes Report 2013

    Value–Based Treatment of Atraumatic Rotator Cu Tears

    Outcomes

    0102030405060708090

    Baseline 6 Weeks 12 Weeks

    Patient completed Survey Scores

    SF 12 MCS

    SF 12 PCS

    ASES

    WORC

    SANE

    Marks Activity Scale0

    20406080

    100120140160180

    Baseline 6 Weeks 12 Weeks

    Degrees

    Range of Motion MeasurementsForward Elevation

    Abduction

    External Rotation atSide

    Internal Rotation atSide

    External Rotation at90° of Abduction

    Nonoperative treatment using the MOON physical therapy program wasfound to be effective for treating atraumatic rotator cuff tears in

    approximately 75% of the 452 patients that were followed for 2 years.Patient reported outcomes improved signi icantly at 6 and 12 weeks. Ifpatients did fail the therapy program it was usually within the irst

    three months.

    Final Cover 12-12-13.pdfWords From The Chairman 12-12-13Spine 12-10-13 (Including Smartart)Page 1Page 2.pdf

    Joints 12-12-13 (Option 2- Rectangles)VBJ 12-10-13 (Updated footers)Pediatrics- Version 6 12-11-13 (Updated V leaf footer)Hand 12-12-13Oncology 12-10-13Oncology 12-9-13 (1st Page)Oncology 12-9-13 (2nd Page).pdf

    Trauma 12-12-13General 12-11-13 (Updated header)Sports 12-10-13 (Update footer)