1
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most challenging problems in orthopedic surgery. Infection in PJI involves the adhesion of bacteria to the implant and the production of a biofilm from the bacterial strains [1,2]. Some bacterial strains such as staphylococci and gram-positive bacteria cannot be completely eliminated by antibiotics and may result in necrosis of tissues surrounding an implant. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is an effective treatment against infection at the implant site. With ALBC a higher level of drug concentration is delivered to the infection site, than can be reached by venous administration. However, the addition of antibiotics may weaken the cement’s mechanical properties. Vancomycin (VAN) loaded in Palacos® R bone cement has shown antibiotic efficacy against main pathogens with sufficient drug elution in vitro, and mechanical properties [3]. Telavancin (TLV) is an investigational lipoglycopeptide antibiotic that is active against gram-positive pathogens, and is anticipated to have similar results as VAN when added to cement. In this study, two different antibiotics (VAN and TLV) with two types of cements (Palacos® R and Simplex® P) were compared in vitro for drug elution, efficacy and cement mechanical properties. BACKGROUND METHODS CONCLUSION Vancomycin and Telavancin Activity and Impact on Mechanical Properties When Added to Orthopedic Bone Cement Sunjung Kim 1 , Aaron R. Bishop 2 , Matthew Squire 3 , Heidi-Lynn Ploeg 1,2,3 , Warren E. Rose 3,4 1 University of Wisconsin Madison, Mechanical Engineering, 2 University of Wisconsin Madison, Biomedical Engineering, 3 University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public, 4 Univeristy of Wisconsin Madison, School of Pharmacy Cement Components Composition Palacos R (Heraeus Medical GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany) Polymer powder Poly(methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate) 33.8 g Zirconium dioxide 5.9 g Hydrous benzoyl peroxide 0.3 g Liquid monomer Methyl methacrylate 18.4 g N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine 0.4 g Simplex P (Stryker Coporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) Polymer powder Polymethyl methacrylate 6 g Methyl methacrylate-styrene-copolymer 29.5 g Benzoyl Peroxide 0.45 g Barium Sulfate, U.S.P. 4 g Liquid monomer Methyl methacrylate 19.4 g N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine 0.52 g Bone Cements Sample Preparation Drug Elution: Disc 6 mm diameter × 4.5 mm height 4-point bending: Beam 75 mm × 10 mm × 3.3 mm Compression: Cylinder 6 mm diameter × 12 mm height Fracture toughness: Beam 44 mm × 10 mm × 5mm with crack length between 4.5 mm and 5.5 mm Antibiotic Elution 60-day elution into 5mL potassium phosphate buffer Incubated (37) and shaken (100 rpm) Drug concentration determined with HPLC and C 18 column Antibiotic Activity 2-week activity with daily sampling in tryptic soy broth Bacterial Strains MRSA: n315 and ATCC 33591; MSSA ATCC 292131; S. epidermidis ATCC 35984 Mechanical Testing Performed on MTS Criterion, MTS Systens Corp., Eden Prairie, MN 21-day wet curing of samples in phosphate buffer solution at 21before testing Testing condition and methods followed ISO 5833 Fracture surface imaged by standard scanning electron microscopy (SEM) RESULTS REFERENCES The samples with 1.0 g of VAN in Palacos R produced the highest mass of eluted antibiotic. Both TLV and VAN had significantly less elution from Simplex P than Palacos R. 0.5 2.0 g of VAN in Palacos R or Simplex P fully eliminated three S. aureus strains within 2 days. 2.0 g of TLV in Palacos R eliminated S. aureus strains but not when added to Simplex P. The cement’s mechanical properties were degraded by added antibiotics and 21-day wet curing VAN and TLV loads of 1.0 g or greater reduced compressive yield strength of Palacos R cement below the ISO minimum. TLV samples tended to have larger pore sizes, and lower mechanical properties than VAN samples. [1] E. E. MacKintosh, J. D. Patel, R. E. Marchant, and J. M. Anderson, “Effects of biomaterial surface chemistry on the adhesion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 836842, 2006. [2] H. Rohde, S. Frankenberger, U. Z ahringer, and D. Mack, “Structure, function and contribution of polysaccharide inter-cellular adhesin (PIA) to Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and pathogenesis of biomaterial-associated infections,” European Journal of Cell Biology,vol.89,no.1,pp.103111, 2010. [3] A. R. Bishop, S. Kim, M. W. Squire, W. E. Rose, and H.-L. Ploeg, “Vancomycin elution, activity and impact on mechanical properties when added to orthopedic bone cement,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 87, 2018. Figure 2. Two weeks activity data from Vancomycin (VAN) and Telavancin (TLV) at 2.0 g per packet of Palacos and Simplex cement with 10 3 initial CFU. VAN + Palacos [2a], VAN + Simplex [2b], TLV + Palacos [2c], TLV + Simplex [2d] Figure 3. Mechanical testing with Vancomycin and Telavancin in Palacos and Simplex after 21 days of wet curing. A significance level of 5% was used for all tests. An * indicates a significant (p< 0.05) difference from Palacos R and Simplex P for each environmental condition. Flexural Modulus Flexural Strength Compressive Yield Strength Fracture Toughness Figure 4. SEM images of bone cement fracture surfaces from fracture toughness samples with 2.0 g of antibiotic. VAN + Palacos R [4a] / VAN + Simplex P [4b] / TLV + Palacos [4c] / TLV + Simplex [4d] Figure 1. 1 to 60 days of elution data of Vancomycin (VAN) and Telavancin (TLV) from Palacos and Simplex bone cement disk. N=15 at each time point. VAN + Palacos [1a], VAN + Simplex [1b], TLV + Palacos [1c], TLV + Simplex [1d] Funding: This study was supported by an investigator initiated grant from Theravance Biopharma R&D, Inc. Presentation# 2404 October 6, 2018 [1a] [1b] [1c] [1d] [2a] [2b] [2c] [2d] [3a] [3b] [3c] [3d] 2.000 1.000 0.500 0.250 0.125 Control 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Fracture Toughness [MPa Vm] Palacos Control Simplex Control Palacos w/ Telavancin Palacos w/ Vancomycin Simplex w/ Telavancin Simplex w/ Vancomycin Type of Antibiotic Added Antibiotic [gram] * * * * * * * * * * [4a] [4b] [4c] [4d] UW Bone and Joint Biomechanics Lab

Vancomycin and Telavancin Activity and Impact on

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Vancomycin and Telavancin Activity and Impact on

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most challenging problems in orthopedicsurgery. Infection in PJI involves the adhesion of bacteria to the implant and theproduction of a biofilm from the bacterial strains [1,2]. Some bacterial strains such asstaphylococci and gram-positive bacteria cannot be completely eliminated by antibioticsand may result in necrosis of tissues surrounding an implant. Antibiotic-loaded bonecement (ALBC) is an effective treatment against infection at the implant site. With ALBC ahigher level of drug concentration is delivered to the infection site, than can be reachedby venous administration. However, the addition of antibiotics may weaken the cement’smechanical properties. Vancomycin (VAN) loaded in Palacos® R bone cement has shownantibiotic efficacy against main pathogens with sufficient drug elution in vitro, andmechanical properties [3]. Telavancin (TLV) is an investigational lipoglycopeptide antibioticthat is active against gram-positive pathogens, and is anticipated to have similar results asVAN when added to cement. In this study, two different antibiotics (VAN and TLV) withtwo types of cements (Palacos® R and Simplex® P) were compared in vitro for drugelution, efficacy and cement mechanical properties.

BACKGROUND

METHODS

CONCLUSION

Vancomycin and Telavancin Activity and Impact on Mechanical Properties When Added to

Orthopedic Bone CementSunjung Kim1 , Aaron R. Bishop2, Matthew Squire3, Heidi-Lynn Ploeg1,2,3, Warren E. Rose3,4

1University of Wisconsin – Madison, Mechanical Engineering, 2University of Wisconsin – Madison, Biomedical Engineering, 3University of Wisconsin School of

Medicine and Public, 4Univeristy of Wisconsin – Madison, School of Pharmacy

Cement Components Composition

Palacos R

(Heraeus Medical

GmbH, Wehrheim,

Germany)

Polymer

powder

Poly(methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate) 33.8 g

Zirconium dioxide 5.9 g

Hydrous benzoyl peroxide 0.3 g

Liquid

monomer

Methyl methacrylate 18.4 g

N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine 0.4 g

Simplex P

(Stryker

Coporation,

Kalamazoo,

Michigan, USA)

Polymer

powder

Polymethyl methacrylate 6 g

Methyl methacrylate-styrene-copolymer 29.5 g

Benzoyl Peroxide 0.45 g

Barium Sulfate, U.S.P. 4 g

Liquid

monomer

Methyl methacrylate 19.4 g

N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine 0.52 g

Bone Cements

Sample Preparation

• Drug Elution: Disc 6 mm diameter × 4.5 mm height

• 4-point bending: Beam 75 mm × 10 mm × 3.3 mm

• Compression: Cylinder 6 mm diameter × 12 mm height

• Fracture toughness: Beam 44 mm × 10 mm × 5mm with crack length

between 4.5 mm and 5.5 mm

Antibiotic Elution

• 60-day elution into 5mL potassium phosphate buffer

• Incubated (37℃) and shaken (100 rpm)

• Drug concentration determined with HPLC and C18 column

Antibiotic Activity

• 2-week activity with daily sampling in tryptic soy broth

Bacterial Strains

• MRSA: n315 and ATCC 33591; MSSA ATCC 292131; S. epidermidis ATCC

35984

Mechanical Testing

• Performed on MTS Criterion, MTS Systens Corp., Eden Prairie, MN

• 21-day wet curing of samples in phosphate buffer solution at 21℃ before

testing

• Testing condition and methods followed ISO 5833

• Fracture surface imaged by standard scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

RESULTS

REFERENCES

• The samples with 1.0 g of VAN in Palacos R produced the highest mass of eluted antibiotic.

• Both TLV and VAN had significantly less elution from Simplex P than Palacos R.

• 0.5 – 2.0 g of VAN in Palacos R or Simplex P fully eliminated three S. aureus strains within 2 days.

• 2.0 g of TLV in Palacos R eliminated S. aureus strains but not when added to Simplex P.

• The cement’s mechanical properties were degraded by added antibiotics and 21-day wet curing

• VAN and TLV loads of 1.0 g or greater reduced compressive yield strength of Palacos R cement below the ISO

minimum.

• TLV samples tended to have larger pore sizes, and lower mechanical properties than VAN samples.

[1] E. E. MacKintosh, J. D. Patel, R. E. Marchant, and J. M. Anderson, “Effects of biomaterial surface chemistry on the adhesion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro,”

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 836–842, 2006. [2] H. Rohde, S. Frankenberger, U. Z ahringer, and D. Mack, “Structure, function and contribution of

polysaccharide inter-cellular adhesin (PIA) to Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and pathogenesis of biomaterial-associated infections,” European Journal of Cell

Biology,vol.89,no.1,pp.103– 111, 2010. [3] A. R. Bishop, S. Kim, M. W. Squire, W. E. Rose, and H.-L. Ploeg, “Vancomycin elution, activity and impact on mechanical properties when added to

orthopedic bone cement,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 87, 2018.

Figure 2. Two weeks activity data from Vancomycin (VAN) and Telavancin (TLV) at 2.0 g per packet of Palacos and Simplex cement with 103 initial CFU. VAN + Palacos [2a], VAN +

Simplex [2b], TLV + Palacos [2c], TLV + Simplex [2d]

Figure 3. Mechanical testing with Vancomycin and Telavancin in Palacos and Simplex after 21 days of wet curing. A significance level of 5% was used for all tests. An * indicates a

significant (p < 0.05) difference from Palacos R and Simplex P for each environmental condition.

Flexural Modulus Flexural Strength Compressive Yield Strength Fracture Toughness

Figure 4. SEM images of bone cement fracture surfaces from

fracture toughness samples with 2.0 g of antibiotic. VAN +

Palacos R [4a] / VAN + Simplex P [4b] / TLV + Palacos [4c] /

TLV + Simplex [4d]

Figure 1. 1 to 60 days of elution data of Vancomycin (VAN) and Telavancin (TLV) from Palacos and Simplex bone cement disk. N=15 at each time point. VAN + Palacos [1a], VAN +

Simplex [1b], TLV + Palacos [1c], TLV + Simplex [1d]

Funding: This study was supported by an investigator

initiated grant from Theravance Biopharma R&D, Inc.Presentation# 2404

October 6, 2018

[1a] [1b] [1c] [1d]

[2a] [2b] [2c] [2d]

[3a] [3b] [3c] [3d]

2.0001.0000.5000.2500.125Control

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

Fra

ctu

re T

ou

gh

ness

[M

Pa V

m]

Palacos Control

Simplex Control

Palacos w/ Telavancin

Palacos w/ Vancomycin

Simplex w/ Telavancin

Simplex w/ Vancomycin

Type of Antibiotic

Added Antibiotic [gram]

*

*

* *

*

* *

**

*

[4a] [4b]

[4c] [4d]

UW Bone and JointBiomechanics Lab