Upload
irving
View
39
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Value Engineering in Hungary Orlando, June 11 2012. Zsuzsanna Kondor Director General Coordination Managing Authority National Development Agency , HUNGARY . The European Union and its Cohesion Policy Value engineering in Hungary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Value Engineering in Hungary Orlando, June 11 2012
Zsuzsanna Kondor Director GeneralCoordination Managing Authority
National Development Agency , HUNGARY
• The European Union and its Cohesion Policy
• Value engineering in Hungary • The role of the National Development
Agency in financing development programmes
• Value engineering case studies • Challenges: preparing for 2014+
Cohesion Policy
Content of the presentation
• The European Union and its Cohesion Policy
<50
50 - 75
75 - 90
90 - 100
100 - 125
³ 125
Differences in development in the
EU-27GDP per head as a % of the
community average
Disparities across the European Union
Hi Lo Ratio
GDP per cap (% EU27 average)
Luxembourg251%
Bulgaria33% 7.6*
Population Germany82.5 million
Malta404,000 204
*In US, this difference is only 2.5 and Japan 2
How much does it cost? One third of the EU budget 2007-2013
€347 billion over 7 years*
*1 EUR = 1,31 USD in January 2007
What does the EU citizen get for this?
The three funds target:
• ERDF (€201 billion): regional development, economic decline in industrial or rural areas, competitiveness and co-operation
• ESF (€76 billion): employment, social inclusion and tackling discrimination
• Cohesion Fund (€70 billion): environment and transport
……with overarching aim of “boosting growth and employment”
Research/Innovation
EnvironmentTransport
Information societySocial infrastructureEnergy
TourismCultureInstitutional capacity
Human capital
Employment
Adaptability of workers and firmsSocial inclusionCapacity buildingTechnical assistance
What do we spend the money on?European Regional Development Fundand Cohesion Fund (€271 billion)
European Social Fund (€76 billion)
Who gets what?• Convergence 81.9% (regions lagging behind the
most)
• Competitiveness 15.7%
• Territorial co-operation 2.4%
• Total budget €347bn, which will unlock up to €700bn
A method based on what works: Programming, Partnership and Decentralised Management
Index EU 25 = 100 Source: Eurostat
Geographical Eligibility for Structural Funds Support 2007-2013
Objective 'RegionalCompetitiveness and Employment'Phasing-in regions, "naturally" above 75%
Convergence objectivestatistically affected regions
Objective 'RegionalCompetitiveness and Employment'
Convergence objective(Regions < 75% in EU 25)
• Value engineering in Hungary
HungaryKnown of:
HungaryKnown of:
• 20 CVS• 19 PVM• over 1000 AVS• 11 Universities• 20-30 VM projects/year
• SHVA 70 members
VM & the Government19
49
L. D. Miles: VE
VM & the Government19
49
1968
L. D. Miles: VEVE in Hungary
VM & the Government19
49
1968
1991
L. D. Miles: VEVE in HungarySociety of Hungarian Value Analysts
VM & the Government19
49
1968
1991
1996
L. D. Miles: VEVE in HungarySociety of Hungarian Value AnalystsVE in Hungarian Public Procurement Act
“The tender-owner might oblige the tenderer to utilize Value Engineering…”
Hungarian Public Procurement Act, 2003. CXXIX. 53. § (4)
VM & the Government19
49
1968
1991
1997
1996
L. D. Miles: VEVE in HungarySociety of Hungarian Value AnalystsVE in Hungarian Public Procurement ActVE in Hungarian Highway Design Act
Prime Ministers Office – Preparation of legislation
Entities utilising VEPUBLIC SECTOR PRIVATE SECTOR
NON-PROFIT SECTOR
• National Bank of Hungary• Nuclear Power Plant• Ministry of Social Affairs• Transport Agencies• National Development
Agency• Hospitals
• Telecommunication• Construction• Banks• Pharmaceutical• Many others
• Autism• Mentally Handicapped• Blind People• Hearing Impairment
• The role of the National Development Agency in financing development programmes
EU funds, 1989-2013
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Phare Phare + ISPA + Sapard SFs + CF ERDF + ESF + CF
Distributing EU funds…
NSRF operational programmes (2007-2013)
Implementation OP
1,3%
State Reform OP
0,6%
Social Infrastructure
OP7,8%
E-Admin. OP1,4%
Economic Development
OP10%
Transport OP25%
Environment and Energy OP
16,8%
Social Renewal OP
14%
ROPs23,2%
• coordination of implementing Structural and Cohesion Funds in Hungary
• USD billion 32,75 for the period 2007-2013• 15 operational programmes - economic,
social, public administration, regional, European territorial cooperation development programmes etc.
• 52,000 projects approved since 2004
National Development Agency
• Value engineering case studies
• National Strategy of Supporting Autistic People, 2008
• Implementation rules for EU funds, 2005• Data and documents handling, 2009• Public procurement control system, 2010• Comperative assessment of EU and national
level regulations, 2012
Successful projects
National Strategy of Supporting Autistic People, 2008
Focus on supporting the autistic children
BEFORE AFTER
Project Owner: Ministry of Social and Labor AffairsProject Subject: Institute Development Conception 2008-2013
Focus both on suporting the autistic children and
adults
Implementation rules for EU funds, 2005
Focus on individual, institutional interests
BEFORE AFTER
Project Owner: National Development AgencyProject Subject: Revision of Implementation Rules for EU funded projects
Focus on programme objectives and common
interests
Data and documents handling, 2009
Focus on various sources of information
BEFORE AFTER
Project Owner: National Development Agency Project Subject: Purchase of Sophisticated IT tool
No change in focus!!!
Public procurement control system, 2010
Focus on large projects and established,
institutional practices
BEFORE AFTER
Project Owner: National Development Agency Project Subject: Redesign of Public Procurement Control System (reduce risks)
Focus on risky public procurements and unified
approach
Comperative assessment of EU and national level regulations, 2012
Focus on
BEFORE AFTER
Project Owner: National Development Agency Project Subject: Reduce administrative burden, restrictions and speed up absorption of funds
Focus on
• Reinforces institutional knowledge • Enhances intraorganisational cooperation
and team work • Top and middle management level support
is a must• Implementation of recommendations is also
a credibility issue• Changes the way we think
Experience
• Challenges: preparing for 2014+ Cohesion Policy
Current context• Crisis, austerity measures in many
Member States, less monies to be better spent
• Use of public funds, accountability, error rate to be reduced
• Need for increased effectiveness
Challenges: preparing for 2014+ Cohesion Policy
The role of the EU 2020 strategy
• Principles of the reformed Cohesion Policy • Thematic concentration• Result orientation (negative and positive
sanctions) • Integrated approach, strenghtened
partnership
Thank you for your attention!
Any questions?