Upload
elmer-tate
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
VA and OSEHRA Perspectives
Citation preview
VA eHMPAgile RFI Community Response
Thursday, February 11, 20163:00 PM EST
Request Summation andTopic Discussion
1. VA and OSEHRA Perspectives2. RFI Overview3. Root Cause Analysis4. Solution Considerations5. Community Recommendations
Contents
VA and OSEHRA Perspectives
• eHMP is the right thing to do• How to do it is the issue• Challenges
– How best to transition from waterfall to Agile development model
– How best to engage the community for optimal collaboration
– How to minimize financial and performance risks for VA
VA’s Perspective
• OSEHRA is a community facilitator, not a solution provider
• Appropriate models of software development management– Leadership– Expertise– Team building– Value exchange
• How do we respond as a community?
OSEHRA’s Perspective
Brief Overview of RFI Topics
• Achieve full and seamless VA-DoD interoperability
• Implement a stakeholder-centric information model
• Build on a future-facing architecture
Objectives of VistA Evolution
• Cooperation between OI&T and VHA• Transition from PMAS to VIP• Length of time to develop CPRS
replacement– Establishing and maintaining solution provider
relationships within current models• Acquisition• Software management
• Building an appropriate SDK
Strategic Challenges in eHMP Development
Root Cause Analysis
• Historical rigidity of PMAS model– Values documentation over product
• Lack of model implementations?• Poor communication between CPRS and
eHMP team• Poor identification and ramp-up of eHMP
resources– Internal– External (with VistA experience)– External (without VistA experience)
Sources of the Current Challenges
• Gaps and overlaps– Technical (product & expertise)
• Perceived shortage of expertise• Perceived difficulty of creating standard
development environment / SDK– Management / contracting
• Not enough VA direction / visibility?– Access to clinical SMEs / testers?
Sources of the Current Challenges
• Incompletely specified / provided infrastructural requirements
• Coarse taxonomy of requirements– Strategic– Infrastructural– Application– Workflow– Communication & documentation
Sources of the Current Challenges
• Agile conditions for success– Skilled Agile development team– Suitable project– Sound practice (don’t skip ceremonies)
• Challenges for Agile in the Federal workspace– Resistance to the culture of scrutiny– Procurement practice and progress assessment– Lack of required skills
Sources of the Current Challenges
Solution Considerations
• Acquisition and development are separate, successive project phases– How does Agile methodology best serve each
one?• Move away from blanket firm-fixed-price
(FFP) acquisition?• Field testing and implementation
– Proper identification of model implementation needs to be clinically driven
What Is Being Managed?
• Where would it make sense to replace a SOW (statement of work) to an SOO (statement of objectives)?– SOO allows agile decision-making– SOO allows distinction between FFP and time-and-
materials (T&M)• T&M risk: ability of government to manage• Decision to request FFP vs. T&M: better made by program
manager than by TAC?• More granularity of timespan, deliverables, contract options?
• Long-term contracting vs. relatively short-term acquisitions?
Can Acquisition Be Improved?
• An appropriately granular taxonomy of requirements is needed– Strategic– Infrastructural– Application– Workflow
• Where does waterfall make better sense than Agile?– Infrastructure-focused tasks– Application-focused tasks– Workflow-focused tasks
Do Requirements Drive Methodology?
• Proper characterization and achievement of needed competencies
• Committed core team with well-identified resources (internal and external)
• A “Chief Agile Officer” to guide and monitor the use (and misuse) of Agile methodologies?
Finding and Building Expertise
Recommendations
• What areas do we target? Suggestions:– Strategy for Agile– Community engagement within the context of
Agile• How do / should we refine the solution
considerations stated in previous slides?
• What haven’t we thought of?
Recommendations
Thank You!
Mike [email protected]