Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 1

ACTSC231 Section 001 Mackay Anne

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 33, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 54, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 39, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 36, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 30, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 34, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 23, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 33, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 18, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 44, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 17, No text required: 8, No opinion: 7

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 54, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 3, No opinion: 9

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3

38% (71 of 185) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 2

ACTSC231 Section 051 Bernard Carole

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 5

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

79% (11 of 14) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 3

ACTSC232 Section 001 Adcock James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 69, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 79, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 60, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 50, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 75, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 23, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 6, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 41

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 36, Interesting: 53, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 64, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 84, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 54, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 60, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 55, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 1, No opinion: 5

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 70, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 86, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 19, 3-6 hours: 59, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

68% (97 of 143) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 4

ACTSC331 Section 001 Cui Zhenyu

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 15, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 11, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 11, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 19, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 3, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 25, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

49% (47 of 95) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 5

ACTSC371 Section 001 Matheson Brenton James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 23, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 29, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 61, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 4, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 35, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 16, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 20, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 25, Often enough: 21, Not often enough: 11, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 26

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 51, Not Interesting: 20, No opinion: 9

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 19, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 27, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 72, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 61, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 46, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 28, No text required: 5, No opinion: 18

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 77, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 82, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 30, 3-6 hours: 47, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

40% (95 of 236) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 6

ACTSC371 Section 051 Bernard Carole

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 1, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

50% (9 of 18) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 7

ACTSC372 Section 001 Wood Peter J

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 64, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 10, Somewhat too high: 21, Just right: 67, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 69, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 54, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 71, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 35, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 16, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 35

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 45, Interesting: 51, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 64, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 81, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 35, Helpful: 62, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 43, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 20, No text required: 8, No opinion: 14

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 75, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 90, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 25, 3-6 hours: 62, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

57% (101 of 176) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 8

ACTSC433/ACTSC833 Section 001 Cai Jun

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 28, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 53, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 4

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 24, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 23, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 17, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 31

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 42, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 20, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 58, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 38, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 44, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 22, No opinion: 12

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 43, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

59% (65 of 111) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 9

ACTSC446/ACTSC846 Section 001 Wang Ruodu

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 20, Good: 45, Satisfactory: 35, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 9, Somewhat too high: 39, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 2, No opinion: 3

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 25, Good: 59, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 38, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 42, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 21, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 17, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 46

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 63, Not Interesting: 18, No opinion: 9

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 24, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 31, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 2

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 73, 75-90%: 22, 50-75%: 9, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 69, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 27, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 29, No text required: 20, No opinion: 22

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 33, Okay: 57, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 83, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 25, 3-6 hours: 56, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

59% (107 of 180) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 10

ACTSC453/ACTSC853 Section 001 Johnston Ricky Mark

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 10, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 5, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

35% (30 of 85) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 11

ACTSC462/ACTSC862 Section 001 Lennox William Scott

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 39, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 62, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 26, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 28, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 36, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 7, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 43

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 29, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 61, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 40, No opinion: 5

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 15, No opinion: 12

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 61, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 4

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 6, No opinion: 14

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 38, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 3

65% (73 of 113) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 12

AMATH231 Section 001 Hewitt Conrad G

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 28, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 30, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 19, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 31, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 18, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 37, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 46, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 35, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 30, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

67% (49 of 73) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 13

AMATH242/CS371 Section 001 Ivan Lucian

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 5, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 3, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 33, No opinion: 1

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

57% (41 of 72) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 14

AMATH250 Section 001 West Joseph John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 89, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 97, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 74, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 81, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 93, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 37, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 38

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 30, Interesting: 65, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 7

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 92, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 90, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 53, Helpful: 53, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 57, Not helpful: 13, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 13

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 69, No opinion: 13

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 92, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 27, Okay: 74, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 14, 3-6 hours: 75, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

56% (111 of 198) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 15

AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 001 Krivodonova Lilia

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 6, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 2, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 26, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 6, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

65% (34 of 52) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 16

AMATH332/PMATH332 Section 001 Moshksar Kamyar

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 4, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 24, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1

62% (31 of 50) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 17

AMATH342 Section 001 De Sterck Hans

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 13, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 15, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 15, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

90% (19 of 21) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 18

AMATH350 Section 001 Harmsworth David L

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 52, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 58, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 57, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 51, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 58, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 25, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 29

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 51, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 7

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 56, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 59, 75-90%: 18, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 36, Helpful: 41, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 41, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 7

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 51, No opinion: 6

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 52, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 67, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 52, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0

66% (78 of 118) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 19

AMATH353 Section 001 Hewitt Conrad G

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 14, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 6, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 9, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 29, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 0

61% (33 of 54) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 20

AMATH361 Section 001 Waite Michael L.

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 28, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 23, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 25, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 17, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 26, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 22, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 9, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

78% (35 of 45) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 21

AMATH373 Section 001 Miskovic Zoran

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 4, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 9, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 7, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 3, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

64% (21 of 33) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 22

AMATH391 Section 001 Vrscay Edward R

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 9, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 7, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 9, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 4, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

75% (15 of 20) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 23

AMATH451 Section 001 Siegel David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 11, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 8, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 10, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 6, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 15, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

64% (21 of 33) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 24

AMATH455/AMATH655 Section 001 Chang Dong Eui

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 4, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 4, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 5, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 5, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 2, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

78% (18 of 23) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 25

AMATH475/AMATH675/PHYS476 Section 001 Girelli Florian

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 12, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 24, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 14, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 26, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 18, No opinion: 11

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3

70% (43 of 61) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 26

CO227 Section 001 Roh Patrick Young

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 18, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 5, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 15, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 12, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 9, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 17, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

52% (32 of 62) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 27

CO250 Section 001 Koenemann Jochen

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 24, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 23, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 23, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 21, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 28, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 24, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 34, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 2

48% (50 of 104) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 28

CO250 Section 002 Georgiou Konstantinos

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 16, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 15, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 16, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 17, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 16, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 9, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 22, No opinion: 6

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 0

47% (56 of 118) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 29

CO250 Section 051 New Stephen

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 8, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 11, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 9, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 10, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 8, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

78% (14 of 18) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 30

CO327 Section 001 Roh Patrick Young

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 6, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 8, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 0

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 7, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 10, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

58% (18 of 31) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 31

CO331 Section 001 Jao David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 10, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 13, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 7, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 11, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 6, No opinion: 8

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

55% (23 of 42) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 32

CO367 Section 001 Wolkowicz Henry

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 1, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 1, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 3, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 1, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 3, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

45% (10 of 22) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 33

CO370 Section 001 Swamy Chaitanya

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 24, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 37, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 12, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 14, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 18, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 34, Not Interesting: 16, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 14, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 2

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 45, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?Too much: 17, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) On av erage, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 26, 7-10 hours: 21, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

63% (59 of 93) of students answered some questions.

Winter 2013 Course Evaluations Page 34

CO372 Section 001 Georgiou Konstantinos

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:Excellent: 21, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?Too High: 8, Somewhat too high: 24, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:Excellent: 25, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)Excellent: 21, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:Excellent: 15, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 22, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 20, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:Excellent: 23, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?90-100%: 45, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 20, No