37
UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist

UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

  • Upload
    vonga

  • View
    222

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications

Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D.Applications Specialist

Page 2: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Which is better for printing and packaging; UV or EB?

Yes

Page 3: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Solvent Based Inks, Coatings, and Adhesives

Solvents function as a “carrier” for the “solids” portion of the ink, coating, or adhesive

Solvent is a high value material with a low value “temporary”functionSolvent costs are increasing with costs of oil and natural gasMost common way to handle solvent emissions is thermal oxidation which produces greenhouse gas (CO2)

Solvent based materials are old technology out of step with a sustainable future

Page 4: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Water Based Inks Coatings and Adhesives

Water – plentiful, low cost, environmentally friendly “carrier”Disadvantages of water:

High energy needed to remove waterHeat of vaporization (calories/gram)

water = 540, toluene = 88, heptane = 76Dryer energy to remove water results in more CO2emissionsWater based coatings typically have some VOC content (co-solvent or coalescing-solvent)Film properties

2-componet systems needed for “resistance” propertiesLower glossLower print quality due to “dot gain”

Page 5: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Ink Drying Energy EstimatesAssume 60” wide, 6 color press, running 1000 ft/min

Solvent/Water (conventional thermal drying)Natural gas fired dryersEstimate 30M Btu/h (880 kW) for drierNeed to gather actual operating press dataOxidizer energy cost dependant on solvent load

UV PressInput power = 8 lamps x 600 w/in x 60 in = 288 kW92% efficient power supply + 30 kW cooling = 343 kW total

EB PressEB power supply plus cooling = 85 kWLiquid nitrogen to supply 80 scfm inerting uses equivalent of about 100 kWTotal = 185 kW

Page 6: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

UV/EB Technology Selection

UV and EB have some similarities and fundamental differencesSelection of UV or EB should be based on the best fit for the process and applicationBest fit considerations may include:

Enabling of end-useCapital costOperating costsEnd-use propertiesFitness for food packagingSubstrate considerations

Page 7: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Energy

UVEnergy in the form of photonsWavelength determines energy; typically 250 to 450 nmEnergy unit conversion; 350 nm photon = 3.5 eVTotal applied energy typically 0.1 to 0.5 J/cm2

EBEnergy in the form of accelerated electronsAccelerating voltage determines energy; typically 80 to 180 kVTypical electron energy at substrate; 70,000 eVTotal applied energy typically 20 to 40 kGy

1 kGy = 1 J/gramFor 50 gram/meter2 layer = 0.1 to 0.2 J/cm2

Page 8: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Energy

UVEnergy not sufficient to directly initiate polymerization (non-ionizing)Photoinitiator must be used

EBWill ionize any organic materialNo photoinitiator needed

Page 9: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Penetration

UVPenetration depends on the optical density of the materialPenetration is controlled by the peak irradiance (power and focus) of the UV sourceGood penetration into clear materialsLimited penetration into pigmented, filled, and opaque materials

Effective curing of thin ink filmsEffective curing of thick coatings with low pigment loadingLamination of clear materials

EBPenetration depends on the mass density of the materialPenetration is controlled by acceleration potential (voltage) of the beamEasily penetrates into clear, pigmented, filled, and opaque materials

Can cure thick and/or heavily pigmented or filled inks and coatingsEnables lamination of opaque materials

Page 10: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Penetration/Energy Deposition

UV Photons EB Electrons

Page 11: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

UV Equipment

Medium pressure mercury electric arc powered lampsMedium pressure mercury microwave powered lampsPulsed xenon lampsSolid state LED arrays

Page 12: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Mercury Arc Lamp Components

Page 13: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Microwave Powered Mercury Lamp Components

Page 14: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Pulsed Xenon Lamp System

Page 15: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

UV LED Array

Page 16: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

UV EquipmentUV Source Strengths Weaknesses

Medium pressure mercury arc powered lamps

High throughputWide widths available (>60”)Broad spectral outputPrinting and converting

High heat outputLong warm-up time (shutters)Non-uniform aging

Medium pressure mercury microwave powered lamps

High throughputLong lamp lifeFast warm-up (no shutters)Industrial and 3D

Each lamp 10” max widthHigh heat output

Pulsed xenon lamps

Very low heatHigh pulse irradianceBroad spectral outputIndex (stop and go) processes

Low continuous output

LED arrays Very long lifeInstant onCompact – system integrationInk jet

Narrow spectral outputLow throughputLow peak irradiance

Page 17: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

EB Equipment

High energy scanning type(300 – 10,000 kV)Industrial self-shielded multi-filament type

(150 – 300 kV)Low energy self-shielded multi-filament type(70 – 150 kV)Low energy compact modular type

(70 – 150 kV)

Page 18: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Electron Beam Equipment

Industrial Electron Beam Processor

New GenerationLow EnergyElectron Beam Processor

Page 19: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Compact Modular EB Emitters

16.0 in

11.5 in

34.0 in

18.0 in

9.9 in

Page 20: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

EB EquipmentEB Source Strengths Weaknesses

High energy scanning(300 – 10,000 kV)

Cure through very thick materials

Curing of compositesCrosslinking of 3D materials

High capital costVery large sizeExtensive shielding

required

Industrial self-shielded multi-filament (150 – 300 kV)

Very high throughputWide widths (>100”)Penetration of thick filmsFilm Crosslinking

High capital costLarge sizePotential substrate

damage

Low energy self-shielded mult-filament (70 – 150 kV)

Very high throughputWide widths (>60”)Controlled penetrationPrinting and packaging

Not well suited for 3D applications

Low energy compact modular (70 – 150 kV)

Lower costPermanent vacuumCompact modular designSurface sterilization

Width maximum 16” per emitter

Lower throughput

Page 21: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Equipment Size

UVRelatively smallFull interstation installation (lamp after each print deck) is commonInterstation lamps allow dry trapping of multiple ink colorsMultiple lamps may be used after last deck for final curing

EBOriginal industrial equipment is quite largeNewer low voltage equipment is much smaller; however, interstation installation still not practicalPrint technologies allow curing with a single EB unit at the end of the press

Web offset (lithographic) printingSun WetFlexTM (flexographic) printing

Low voltage permanent vacuum type could potentially allow interstation installation

Page 22: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Equipment Safety

UVUV light can cause skin and eye damage upon exposureHigh temperature lamp could result in skin burns upon contactUV lamp units are completely self shielded

EBLimited penetration of electronsSecondary x-rays are primary hazardNot radioactive. No radiation can be present unless high voltage is onEB units are completely self-shieldedInterlocked to cut power if shielding is removedContinuous monitoring will shut-down unit if x-rays are present

Page 23: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Capital Cost

UVRelatively low cost for few number of relatively narrow lampsHigh-speed (>1000 ft/min) will typically require 4 to 6 lamps in seriesWide web (>50 inch) multi-lamp systems begin to approach EB costs

EBOriginal higher voltage (>150 kV) units cost greater than $ 1 MMNewer lower voltage equipment has reduced cost 50% or moreSingle EB unit will cure >50 inch-wide web at >1000 ft/min

Page 24: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Operating Costs

UVAbout half of the energy input to the lamp is converted to UV lightRemaining energy is lost as heatAdditional energy required for lamp cooling (air blowers most common)

EBMore efficient conversion of electrical power to curing energyAdditional energy requirements for vacuum pumps, water coolingAdditional cost of Nitrogen

Page 25: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

InertingUV

Free-radical curing inhibited by atmospheric oxygenCuring in air can be accomplished for many systems due to high surface irradianceAir curing important for sheet-fed printing applicationsInerting can greatly accelerate cure and/or reduce photoinitiator requirementsInerting may be an attractive option for food packaging

EBFree-radical curing inhibited by atmospheric oxygenInks and coating require an inert atmosphere to cureEffective inerting limited to web applicationsLaminations can be cured without inerting since laminate layer excludes oxygen

Page 26: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Effect on Substrates

UVNon-ionizing energy has limited effect on thermal and mechanical properties of substratesSeparate UV primer layer may be used for grafting/enhanced adhesionMaterials that soak into porous substrates (uncoated paper) may limit curing

EBMay cross-link or degrade polymer substratesLow-voltage allows surface curing with little or no effect on inside surfaceEffect may be beneficial

Cross-linking film for shrink applicationsSimultaneous curing and grafting for enhanced adhesionSimultaneous curing on surface and sterilization of food contact layer

Page 27: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Heat ControlUV

Mercury lamps produce significant heatHeat control measures needed for many packaging films

Dichroic reflectorsHot mirrorsWater cooled lampsChill drums

EBCooler process compared to UVMany packaging films can be run without special coolingEB units available with or without integral chill drums

Page 28: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Food Packaging Considerations

UVProperly formulated systems produce little or no taint or odorNeed to consider migration of residual uncured materialMethodology available to establish food law complianceNeed to consider photoinitiator migration

Unreacted photoinitiator as well as fragmentsNew systems available to minimize migration

Polymeric photointiatorsReactive photointiatorsResins with built-in initiators

New systems performance limited for dark inks

EBProperly formulated systems produce little or no taint or odorHigh conversions may be achievedNeed to confirm that migration does not occurMethodology available to establish food law compliancePhotoinitiator is not used

Page 29: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Consistency/MaintenanceUV (mercury arc lamps)

Output can decrease as lamps ageDecrease not uniform across spectral outputDecrease may not be uniform across the webSystems available that can monitor and adjust outputTypical preventative maintenance interval 1000 to 3000 hoursMaintenance interval will depend on process cleanliness and lamp temperature controlTypical maintenance items are bulbs and reflectorsMultiple lamp systems allow process to continue at slower speed incase of single lamp failure

EBOutput is very consistent over time (on or off)Cross-web uniformity is constant over timeTypical preventative maintenance interval is 4000 to 8000 hoursMaintenance interval will depend on process cleanliness and window/foil temperature controlTypical preventative maintenance items are window foil and filamentsProcess must be stopped for window foil or filament change

Page 30: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Measurement

UVMeasurement is critical for maintaining a constant processWide range of radiometers are available

Probes (inserted, fixed)Radiometer attached to substratesUV sensitive films attached to substrates

Need to understand limits of each type of radiometer

EBMeasurement is critical for maintaining a constant processEB sensitive film dosimeters most commonDosimeters traceable to NIST standards

Page 31: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

UV/EB Package Printing(by printing technology)

Printing Technology UV EB

Gravure Limited Limited

Flexo - narrow web Well established Limited

Flexo – wide web Limited Limited/Growing

Offset - web Established Established/Growing

Offset - sheet fed Well established Limited

Screen Well established Not used

Digital Growing (ink jet) Not used

Page 32: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

In-line Flexo with Interstation UV Curing

Page 33: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Wide Web EB Flexo Printing (WetFlexTM)

ELECTRON BEAM

FLEXOCI DRUM

Page 34: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

EB Curing In-Line with Web Offset Printing

Page 35: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

UV/EB Package Printing(by package type)

Package Type UV EB

Folding cartons Well established Well established

Multi-wall bags Well established Well established

Flexible packaging Limited Limited/Growing

Ridged containers-Labels-Cans-Plastic/composite/lids

Well establishedWell establishedWell established

Established/GrowingNot usedLimited

Page 36: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Conclusions

UV and EB are environmentally sound technologies well suited for use in printing and packaging applicationsThe selection of UV or EB should be based on the best fit for the selected application

Page 37: UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications · UV/EB Equipment for Printing & Packaging Applications Stephen C. Lapin, Ph.D. Applications Specialist. Which is better for

Please remember to turn in your evaluation sheet...

Thank you

PRESENTED BY

Steve LapinApplications SpecialistPCT Engineered [email protected]