UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Wired attraction ... · Burnstein,, E. & McRae, A. (1962). Some effects of shared threat and prejudice in racially mixed Some effects of shared

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Wired attraction : effects of ICT use on social cohesion in organizational groupsSimons, M.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Simons, M. (2004). Wired attraction : effects of ICT use on social cohesion in organizational groups Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 25 Feb 2019

http://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/wired-attraction--effects-of-ict-use-on-social-cohesion-in-organizational-groups(c430c3fe-12f1-4df7-a345-fe02e053d6ed).html

References References

References s

Alblas,, G. & Wijsman, E. (1993). Gedrag in organisaties. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

Adler,, P. S. & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social Capital:Prospects for a new concept. Academy of ManagementManagement Review, 27(1), pp. 17-40.

Adrianson,, L. & Hjelmquist, E. (1991). Group processes in face-to-face and computer mediated communication.. Behaviour and Information Technology, 10, pp. 281-296.

Alderfer,, C. (1977). Group and intergroup relations. In: Hackman, J. R. & J. L. Suttle (eds.), ImprovingImproving the Quality of Work Life (pp. 227-296). Pallisades, CA:Goodyear.

Arbuckle,, J. L. & Wothke, W. (1994). Amos 4.0 User's Guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.

Arrow,, H. & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work. A theoretical framework.. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, pp. 373-411.

Asch,, S. E. (1952). Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Ashforth,, B. E. & Meal, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of ManagementManagement Review, 14, pp. 20-39.

Back,, K.W. (1951). Influence through social communication, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,Psychology, 46, pp. 9-23.

Barker,, J. R. & Tomkins, P. K. (1994). Identification in the self-managing organization: Characteristicss of target and tenure.. Human Communication Research, 21, pp. 223-240. .

Barley,, R. S. (1986). Technology and structuring of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, pp.. 78-108.

Barley,, R. S. (1990). Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longitudinal Field Work. Organization Science,Science, 1(3), pp. 220-247.

Bax,, E. H. (1991). Organisatiecultuur, technologie en management in een veranderende omgeving. Utrecht:: Het Spectrum.

Becker,, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are the distinctions worth making? Academy of ManagementManagement Journal, 35(1), pp. 232-242.

Bentler,, P. M. & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modelling. Sociological Methods and Research,Research, 16, pp. 78-117.

Bergen,, A. van & Koekebakker, J. (1959). Group cohesiveness in laboratory experiments. Acta PsychologicaPsychologica 16, pp. 81-98.

Berkowitz,, L., Levy, B. & Harvey, (1957). Effects of performance evaluations on group integration andd motivatioa Human Relations, 10, pp. 195-208.

Bernthal,, P. R. & Insko, C. A. (1993). Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of sociall and task cohesion. Group and Organization Management, 18(1), pp. 66-87.

Bion,, W.R. (1961). Experience in Groups. New York: Basic Books.

134 4


Boer,, N. I., Baaien, P. van & Kumar, K. (2002). The implications of different models of social relationshipss for knowledge sharing. Proceedings of the third European Conference on Organizational Knowledge,Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities. Athens, Greece: ALBA .

Bouas,, K. S. & Arrow, H. (1996). The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groupss with membership change. Computer supported cooperative work, 4, pp. 153-178.

Bourdieu,, P. & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: Universityy of Chicago Press.

Brewer,, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality andand Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, pp. 475-482.

Brown,, R. J. (1984). The role of similarity in intergroup relations. In: H. Tajfel (ed.), The Social Dimension:Dimension: European developments in social psychology (vol. 2, pp 603-23). Cambridge: Cambridge Universityy Press.

Burke,, K. (1972). Dramatism and development. Barre, Mass: Clark University Press.

Burnstein,, E. & McRae, A. (1962). Some effects of shared threat and prejudice in racially mixed groups.. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, pp. 257-63.

Burt,, R. S., (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp. 339-365. .

Byrne,, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

Byrne,, D. & Wong, T. J. (1962). Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity off attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, pp. 246-52.

Campbell,, K., Marsden, P., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Soc. Networks,Networks, 8, pp. 97-117.

Carless,, A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research,Research, 31(1), pp. 71-88.

Carron,, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assesss cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7,, pp. 244-266.

Cartwright,, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In: Cartwright, D. & A. Zander (eds.,), GroupGroup Dynamics: Research and Theory (3rd edn, pp. 91-109), London: Tavistock.

Cartwright,, D. and Zander, A. (eds) (1968). Group dynamics: Research and Theory (3rd edn.).London: Travistock. .

Castells,, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Cheney,, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field studyy of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, pp. 342-362.

Cohen,, S.G. & Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shopp floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), pp. 239-290.

135 5


Coleman,, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94,, pp. 95-120.

Coleman,, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Contractorr & Eisenberg, E.M. (1990). Communication networks and new media in organizations. In: Fulk,, J. & C. W. Steinfield (eds.), Organization and Communication Technology (pp. 143-172). Newburyy Park CA: Sage Publications

Cook,, S. W. (1978). Interpersonal and attitudinal outcomes in cooperating interracial groups. Journal ofof Research and Development in Education, 12, pp. 97-113.

Cota,, A., Longman, R., Evans, C, Dion, K., & Kilik , L. (1995). Using and misusing factor analysis to exploree group cohesion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, pp. 308-316.

Crowstone,, K. & Malone, T.W. (1994). Information Technology and Work Organization. In: Allen, T. J.. & M. S. Morton (eds.), Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies. Neww York: Oxford University Press.

Daft,, R. L. (1992), Organization Theory Design. Saint Paul: West Publishing Company.

Daft,, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizationall design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, pp. 191-233.

Daft,, R. L. and Wiginton, J. C. (1979). Language and organization. Academy of Management Review, 4,, pp. 179-191.

Deal,, T. E. & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading,, MA: Addison-Wesley.

DeSanctis,, G. & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptivee Structuration Theory. Organization Science, 5(2), pp. 121-147.

Dijk,, J. van (1997). The Reality of Virtual Communities. Trends in Communication, 2, pp. 39-63.

Dutton,, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification.. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp. 239-263.

Ellemers,, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwekerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group andd group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology,Psychology, 29, pp. 371-389.

Ellemers,, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identificationn as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (3), pp. 617-626.

Elsbach,Elsbach, K.D. (1999). An expanded model of organizational identification, Research in Organization Behavior,Behavior, 21, pp. 163-200.

Evans,, N. J. & Jarvis, P. A. (1980). Group cohesion: a review and re-evaluation. Small Group BehaviorBehavior 11, pp. 359-70.

Evans,, N. J. & Jarvis, P. A. (1986). The Group Attitude Scale: A measure of attraction to group. SmallSmall Group Behavior, 17, pp. 203-216.

136 6


Feldman,, M. S. (1987). Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Office Technology and People, 3,, pp. 83-101.

Festinger,, L. (1953). Group attraction and membership. In: Cartwright, D. & A. Zander (cds.J, GroupGroup Dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 92-101). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

Festinger,, L., Schachter, S. & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harperr and Row.

Finholt,, T. & Sproull, L. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1, pp. 41-64.

Frissen,, P.H.A. (1989). Bureaucratische cultuur en informatisering. Een studie naar de betekenis van informatiseringinformatisering voor de cultuur van een overheidsorganisatie. 's-Gravenhage: SDU Uitgeverij.

Fuik,, J. & Steinfield, C.W. (eds.) Organization and Communication Technology. Newbury Park, California:: Sage Publications.

Fuik,, J. & Desanctis, G. (1995). Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms. OrganizationOrganization Science. 6(4), pp. 337-349.

Gal,, R. & Manning, F. J. (1987). Morale and its components: A cross-national comparison. Journal of AppliedApplied Social Psychology, 17̂ pp. 369-391.

Gallhofer,, I. N., Saris, W. E., & Melman, M. (1986). Different text analysis procedures for the study of decisiondecision making. Amsterdam: SRF.

Galtung,, J. (1988). Methodology and development. Copenhagen: Ejlers.

Gargiulo,, M (1993). Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics. AdministrativeAdministrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp. 1-19.

Gargiulo,, M. & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, andd the Adaptation of Social Capital. Organization Science, 11(2), pp. 183-196.

Garton,, L. & Wellman, B. (1995). Social Impact of Ectectronic Mail in Organizations: A Review of thee Research Literature. Communication Yearbook, 18, pp. 434-453.

Garud,, W. R. & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2000). De band van telewerkers met de organisatie: communicatiepatronenn bij virtuele organisaties. Tijdschrift voor strategische bedrijfscommunicatie, 6(3),, pp. 12.

George,, J. M. & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance and turnover:: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, pp.698-709.

Giddens,, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polityy Press.

Goode,, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). Putting out the flames: The etiquette and law of a-mail. Online, pp. 61-65. .

Goodman,, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. ResearchResearch in Organizational Behavior, 9, pp. 121-173.

137 7


Guzzo,, R.A. & Shea, G.P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In: Dunette,, M. D. & L.M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (2nd

Edn,, Vol. 3., pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Gundlach,, R.H. (1956). Effects on-the-job experiences with negroes upon racial attitudes of white workerss in union shops. Psychological Reports 2, pp.67-77.

Hackman,, J. R. (1976). Group influence on individuals. In: Dunnette, M. D. (ed.), Handbook of industrialindustrial organizational Psychology (pp. 1455-1525). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

Hackman,, J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. In: Lorsch, J. W. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational BehaviorBehavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hackman,, J. R. & Morris, C.G. (1975). Group Tasks, group interaction process, and group performancee effectiveness: a review and proposed integration. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in ExperimentalExperimental Social Psychology (vol 8, pp. 1-55). New York: Academic Press.

Harasim,, L. M. & Winkelmans, T. (1990). Computer-mediated scholarly collaboration. Knowledge: Creation,Creation, diffusion, Utilization, 11, pp. 382-409.

Hofstede,, G. (1995). Allemaal andersdenkenden; omgaan met cultuurverschillen. Amsterdam: Uitgeverijj Contact.

Hofstede,, G. B. Neuijen, D. H. Ohayv & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures. AdministrativeAdministrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 286-316.

Hogg,, M.A. (1987). Social identity and group cohesiveness. In: Turner, J. C, M.A. Hogg, P.J. Oakes, S.D.. Reicher & M.S. Wetherell (eds.) Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-categorization theory (pp.. 89-116). Oxford and New York: Blackwell.

Hogg,, M.A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Harvesterr Wheatsheaf.

Hogg,, M. A. & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts.. Academy of Management Review 25(1), pp. 121-140.

Hooff,, B. J. van den (1997). Incorporating Electronic Mail. Adoption, Use and Effects of Electronic MailMail in Organizations. Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Uitgever.

Hooff,, B. J. van den, Ridder, J. A. de & Aukema, E.J (in press). Exploring the Eagerness to Share Knowledge:: The Role of ICT and Social Capitalin Knowledge Sharing. In: Huysman, M.H. & V. Wulf (eds.)) Social Capital and Information Technology. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press

Huff,, C, Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1989). Computer communication and organizational commitment: Tracingg the relationship in a city government. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, pp. 1371-1391. .

Israel,, J. (1956). Self-evaluation and Rejection in Groups, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

Jellineck,, M., Smircich, L. & Hirsch, P. (1983). Introduction: a Code of Many Colors. Administrative ScienceScience Quarterly, 23, pp. 331-338.

Jones,, S. G. (ed.) (1995). Virtual Culture. Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. London/New Dehli:: Sage.

138 8


Kaye,, A. R. (1992). Computer conferencing and mass distance education. In: Waggoner, M. (ed.) EmpoweringEmpowering networks: Using computer conferencing in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology. .

Kidwell,, R. E., Mossholder, K.. W. & Bennett, N. (1997). Cohesiveness and Organizational Citizenshipp Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis Using Work Groups and Individuals. Journal of Management,Management, 23(6), pp. 775-793.

Kiesler,, S. & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. OrganizationOrganization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, pp. 96-123.

Knippenberg,, D. van & Schie, E. C. M. van (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification.. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 73, pp. 137-147.

Lazarsfield,, P. F. & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodologicall analysis. In: Berger, M., T. Abel & C.H. Page (edsj, Freedom and Control in ModernModern Society (pp. 18-66), New York: Van Nostrand.

Leana,, C. R. & Van Buren III , H. J. (1999). Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices. AcademyAcademy of Management Review, 24 (3), pp. 538-555.

Lerner,, M. J. & Becker, S. (1962). Interpersonal choice as a function of ascribed similarity and definitionn of the situation. Human Relations, 15, pp. 27-34.

Lewicki,, R. J., McAllister, D. J. , & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities.. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), pp. 438-458.

Lewin,, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 44,, pp. 868-97.

Libo,, L.M. (1953). Measuring Group Cohesiveness, Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, Universityy of Michigan.

Lott,, A. J. & Lott, B. E. (1965). 'Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction', Psychological Bulletin,Bulletin, 64, pp. 259-309.

Lott,, B.E. (1961). Group cohesiveness: a learning phenomenon. Journal of Social Psychology 55, pp. 275-86. .

Mackay,, W. E. (1988). Diversity in the Use of Electronic Mail. ACM Transactions on Office InformationInformation Systems, 6(4), pp. 380-397.

Mael,, F. & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and thier alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated modell of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, pp. 103-123.

Mael,, F. A. & Tetrick, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educatoinal and PsychologicalPsychological Measurement, 52(4), pp. 813-824.

Makradakis,, S. (1995). The forthcoming information revolution. Its impact on society and forms. FuturesFutures 27( 8), pp. 799-821.

Malone,, T. W. & Rockart, J. .F. (1991). Computers, Networks and the Corporation. Scientific American,American, 265(3), pp. 92-99.

139 9


Martens,, R. & Peterson, J. A. (1971). Group cohesiveness as a determinant of success and member satisfactionn in team performance. International Review of Sports Sociology, 6, pp. 49-61.

Mastenbroekk (1992). Conflicthantering en organisatie-ontwikkeling. (3e herziene druk). Alphen a/d Rijn;; Samson Bedrijfsinformatie.

Mathieu,, J. E. & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequencess of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp. 171-194.

McAllister,, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperationn in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), pp. 24-59.

McFarlanee Shore, L„ Barksdale, K., & Shore, T. H. (1995). Managerial perceptions of employee commitoientt to the organization. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), pp. 1593-1615.

McGrath,, J.E. and Kravitz, D.A. (1982). Group research. Annual Review of Psychology 33, pp. 195-230. .

Meyer,, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment: some methodologicall considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, pp. 372-378.

Morton,, M.S. (1996). How information technologies can transform organizations. In: King, R. (ed.), Groupware:Groupware: Technology and applications (pp. 148-160). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mowday,, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment.. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, pp. 210-227.

Mudrack,, P.E. (1989). Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion. Small Group Behavior 20,, pp. 37-49.

Mullen,, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), pp. 210-227.

Nahapiet,, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage.. Academy of Management Review, 23, pp. 242-266.

Nohria,, N. (1992). Introduction: Is a Network Perspective a Useful Way of Studying Organizations?. In:: Nohria, N. & R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations. Structure, Form, and Action (pp. 1-22).. Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Business School Press.

Nohria,, N. & Berkley, J. D. (1994). The virtual organization. Bureaucracy, Technology, and the Implosionn of Control. In: Heckscher, C. & A. Donnellon (eds.), The Post Bureaucratic Organization. NewNew Perspectives on Organizational Change (pp. 108-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. .

Nohria,, N. & Eccles, R. (1992). Face-to-Face: Making Network Organisations Work. In: Nohria, N. & R.. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organisations: Structure, form and action (pp. 288-308). Boston: Harvardd Business School Press.

Organ,, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA:: Lexington Books.

Organ,, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in organizationalorganizational behavior, 12, pp. 43-72.

140 0


Orlikowski,, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations.. Organization Science, 3, pp. 398-427.

Osterloh,, M. & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. OrganizationOrganization Science, 11(5), pp. 538-550.

Podsakoff,, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B. , & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors andd substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust and organizationall citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, pp. 259-298.

Porter,, L. W. & Lawler, E. E. (1965). Properties of organisation structure in relation to job attitudes andd job behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 64, pp. 23-51.

Reicher,, S., Spears, R. & Postmes, T. (1995). A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena. In:: Stroebe, W. & M. Hewstonde (eds.), European Review of Social Psychology 6. Chichester, England:: Wiley.

Rice,, R. E. (1987). Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication,Communication, 37(4), pp. 65-94.

Rice,, R. E, (1990). Computer-Mediated Communication System Network Data: Theoretical concerns andd empirical examples. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 32, pp. 627-647.

Rice,, R. E. & Steinfield, C. W. (1994). New forms of organizational communication via electronic maill and voice messaging. In: Adrianson, J. H. & R. Roe (eds.) Telematics and work (pp. 109-137). Hillsdale,, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ridder,, J. A. de (1984). Persconcentratie in Nederland. Begripsvorming bepaling en beschrijving. Amsterdam:: VU Uitgeverij.

Ridder,, J. A. de (1998). Communication to prevent information overload. In: Cuilenburg, J. J. van && S. Zwier (eds). Proceedings oftheASCoR opening conference 1997 (pp. 157-165). Amsterdam: Hett Spinhuis.

Riordan,, C. M., & Shore, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examinationn of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, pp. 342-358. .

Riordan,, C. M., & Weatherly, E. W. (1999). Defining and measuring employees' identification with theirr work groups. Educational an Psychological Measurement 59(2), pp. 310-324.

Robey,, D., Vaverek, K. A., & Saunders, C. S. (1989). Social Structure and Electronic Communication:: A Study of Computer Conferencing. Paper presented at the Hawaiian International ConferenceConference on Information Systems, Kona, HI.

Rothberger,, H. (1997). External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions in in-group and out-groupp homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), pp. 1206-1212.

Saris,, W. E. & Stronkhorst, L. H. (1984). Causal modelling in non-experimental research: an introductionintroduction to the LISREL approach. Amsterdam: Sociometrie Research Foundation.

Schein,, E. H. (1987). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco/London: Jossey-Bass

Schopler,, J. & Bateson, N. (1962). A dependence interpretation of the effects of a severe initiation. JournalJournal of Personality, 30, pp. 633-49.

141 1


Schutz,, W. C. (1966/ The Interpersonal Underworld, Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

Scott,, C. R. (1997). Identification with multiple targets in a geographically dispersed organization. ManagementManagement Communication Quarterly, 11, pp. 491-522.

Seashore,, S. (1954/ Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Sociall Research.

Shaw,, M. E. & Gilchrist, J. C. (1955). Repetitive task failure and sociometrie choice. Journal of AbnormalAbnormal and Social Psychology, 50, pp. 29-32.

Shaw,, M. E. (1976). Group Dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (2nd edn.) New York: McGraw-Hill. McGraw-Hill.

Sherif,, M. (1967). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegann Paul.

Simons,, M. E., Wijk, M. van, & Ridder, J.A. de (2003). ICT-gebruik en Identificatieprocessen in Organisaties.. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 31(1), pp. 31-44.

Soeters,, J.M.L.M. (1997). Organisatiegrenzen en informatietechnologie. Management & Informatie, 5(( 3), pp. 76-83.

Spears,, R. & Lea, M. (1992). Social Influence and the Influence of the Social in Computer-Mediated Communication.. In: Lea, M. (ed.), Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 30-65). Hemell Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Sproull,, L. & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections, new ways of working in the networked organisation. Cambridge,, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Steers,, R.M. (1991). Introduction to Organisational Behaviour (4th ed.) New York: HarperCollins Publisherss Inc.

Steinfield,, C. W. (1985). Dimensions of electronic mail use in an organizational setting . In: Pearce J. && R. Robinson (eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Academy of Management (pp. 239-243).. Mississippi State: Academy of Management.

Stokes,, J. P. (1983). Toward an understanding of cohesion in personal change groups. International JournalJournal of Group Psychotherapy, 33(4), pp. 449-67.

Sundstrom,, E., De Meuse, K., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. AmericanAmerican Psychologist, 45, pp.120-133.

Swanborn,, P. G. (1987). Methoden van Sociaal-Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek. Meppel: Boom.

Tajfel,, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin, W. G. & S.Worchell (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey CA: Brooks/Cole.

Tajfel,, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel, S. & W.G.. Austin (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Tapscott,, D. (1996). The Digital Economy. Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. Neww York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

142 2


Terry,, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. AcademyAcademy of Management Review, 25( 1), pp. 121 -140.

Theil,, H. (1967). Economics and Information theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company. .

Thibaut,, J. W. (1950). An experimental of the cohesiveness of underprivileged groups. Human Relations,Relations, 3, pp. 251-78.

Trevino,, L. K.., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolicc Interactionist Perspective. In: Fulk, J. & C. W. Steinfield (eds.), Organizations and CommunicationCommunication Technology (pp. 71-94). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Tsai,, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. AcademyAcademy of Management Journal, 41(4), pp. 464-476.

Tsui,, A. Egan, T. & O'Reilly, C. Ill (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizationall attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp. 549-579.

Turner,, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: Tajfel, H. (ed.), Social IdentityIdentity andIntergroup Relations (pp. 1540), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Turner,, J. C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In: Tajfel, H. (ed.), The SocialSocial Dimension: European developments in social psychology (vol. 2, pp. 518-538). Cambridge: Cambridgee University Press.

Turner,, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior.. In: Lawler, E. J. (ed.), Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research (vol. 2, pp. 77-122),, Greenwich CT: JAI Press.

Turner,, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D„ & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the socialsocial group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Walker,, G., Kogut, G. & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes, and the formation of an industryy network. Organization Science, 8(2), pp. 109-125.

Walther,, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. CommunicationCommunication Research, 52, pp. 52-90.

Walton,, R. E. (1989). The relationships between information, technology and organisation. Crucial, complexx and manageable. In: Walton, R. E. (ed.), Up and running, integration information technology andand organisation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Wech,, B. A., Mossholder, K. W., Steel, R. P., & Bennet, N. (1998). Does work group cohesiveness affectt individuals' performance and organizational commitment? A cross-level examination. Small GroupGroup Research 29(4), pp. 472-494.

Widmeyer,, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1985). The Measurement of Cohesion in Sports Teams:Teams: The group environment questionnaire. London, Ontario: Sports Dynamics.

Yin,, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: design and methods (revised edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. .

Yukelson,, D., Weinberg, R., & Jackson, A. (1984). A multidimensional group cohesion instrument for intercollegiatee basketball teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, pp. 103-117.

143 3


Zaccaro,, S. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes:: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, Ol^pp. 387-399.

Zaccaro,, S., & Lowe, C. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance: Evidence for multidimensionality. JournalJournal of Social Psychology, 128A pp. 547-558.

Zander,, A. (1979). The psychology of group processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 30A pp. 417-51.

Zander,, A., Stotland, E. & Wolfe, D. (1960). Unity of group, identification with group, and self esteem off members. Journal of Personality, 28, pp. 463-78.

Zuurmondd A. (1994). De Infocratie: een theoretische en empirische heroriëntatie op Weber's ideaaltypeideaaltype in het informatietijdperk. Den Haag: Pheadrus.

144 4


145 5

Documents

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Wired attraction ... · Burnstein,, E. & McRae, A. (1962). Some effects of shared threat and prejudice in racially mixed Some effects of shared