If you can't read please download the document
Upload
sharlene-rodgers
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cory Hallam, Ph.D. Assistant VP for Commercialization Alliances and Innovation VPR Web Site vpr.utsa.edu Click on left hand side “Commercialization and Tech Transfer” (c) 2009 Cory Hallam
Citation preview
UTSA DRA Introduction to Intellectual Property
Cory Hallam With adaptations from S. Chandler, Jackson Walker LLP.
2009 Cory Hallam Cory Hallam, Ph.D. Assistant VP for
CommercializationAlliances and Innovation VPR Web Site vpr.utsa.edu
Click on left hand sideCommercialization and TechTransfer (c) 2009
Cory Hallam Types of Intellectual Property
Patents the inventor has the right to excludeothers from making the
invention, requiresenforcement Trade Secrets/Know How by keeping it
secretno one else can copy it Trademarks/Service Marks Logos,
words,and/or phrases that identify a unique source of goodsor
services Copyrights protection against others copying original
works (i.e. music, books, software code) (c) 2009 Cory Hallam
Examples Business name: MacDonaldstrade name
Product marks/logos: trademark Software, texts, music.copyright
art, creative works Inventions new drug formulation..patent Recipe
for Coca-Cola ...trade secret (c) 2009 Cory Hallam What We Need to
Know Inventions made by faculty, staff and students as part of
sponsoredresearch and/or employment at UTSA belong to the UT
SystemBoard of Regents (Series 9000 rules) Sponsored research may
involve the creation of IP, use of existingIP, or use of
proprietary materials ensuring these issues areaddressed prior to
proposal submittal and/or contract execution isimportant to
preserve UTSAs rights to invention Making an unprotected invention
public via a proposal,presentation, or paper can cause the
university to lose its rights tothe invention it is considered
public The Bayh-Dole act also requires that universities actively
work toprotect and commercialize IP created from federally funded
projects (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Patents Definition: A patent is a
grant from the U.S. governmentallowing its owner to exclude others
from making, using,offering to sell, selling, or importing into the
U.S. herinvention There are three types of patents: Utility
patents, which protect new and useful inventionsand processes
Design patents, which protect new and ornamentaldesigns for
articles Plant patents, which protect new and distinct
plantvarieties that are asexually reproduced Utility patents are
the most common: approx. 90% in 1999 (c) 2009 Cory Hallam What is
Patentable? Any new and useful Process Machine
Method of manufacture Composition of matter Improvements on
existing things Software Methods of doing business (c) 2009 Cory
Hallam Patents What is protectable?
Cant patent laws of nature, mental processes,mathematical
algorithms per se or abstract ideas Utility patents are available
for the invention or discovery ofany new, useful and non-obvious
process, machine orinvention Novelty means that the invention is
new even a minordifference conveys novelty. A single prior art
patent that claimsthe same invention is enough to defeat novelty.
Only useful inventions are patentable. Must have some utilityor
achieve some objective. Inoperative inventions do not haveutility.
Non-obviousness means that the differences between what isout there
and your invention are not trivial to one skilled in the art.
Somewhat subjective determination of the PTO examiner. (c) 2009
Cory Hallam Duration of Protection
17 years from issue date (pre-June 8, 1995) 20 years from earliest
U.S. filing date (post-June 8, 1995) Outside of U.S. typically 20
years from filingdate ** Maintenance Fees must be paid to keep in
force. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Patents Loss of Rights to File
Bar Dates: For U.S. patent: application will be barred if not
filedwithin one year of the first: Public use Public disclosure
(e.g., printed publication) Sale/Offer for sale For International
patent: application will be barred ifnot filed before any public
disclosure/public use of theinvention anywhere. USPTO filing
considered filingfor this purpose Best policy: File with the USPTO
prior to any disclosure if possible to preserve foreign filing
rights (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Patents - Other Considerations
Patents are issued on a country-by-countrybasis A U.S. patent will
not stop someone in Japan,etc. from exploiting the patent (you can
stopimports of infringing goods, though) No international patent
International process for obtaining nationalpatents (Patent
Cooperation Treaty, or PCT) (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Provisional
Patents Provisional Patent Applications
Inexpensive way to get an invention on file with theUSPTO; Filing
fee ($160/$80) + legal fees is typicallyless than $2,500 Must
enable; no new matter in the later, regularapplication Must file
regular application within 12 months tomaintain priority of filing
date (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Patents First to Invent in U.S.
Laboratory Notebooks What are they? Technical diary; Ideas,
completed work, and accomplishments; Chronological order; Helps
avoid repeated mistakes; and Helps to track successes and failures.
Good Laboratory Practice is documentation that maintains an
accurate technical diary containing detailed documents of your
ideas, completed work and accomplishments.Good technicians record
their developments in chronological order so that they can refer
back to their diary days, weeks or months later.This enables them
to avoid running up the same blind alley twice.Second, good
recordswill shed light on subsequent developments, will allow the
inventor to find needed data and details of past developments and
will provide a base for new paths of exploration and ramifications,
especially if failures have occurred. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam What
should be entered into notebook?
Title (what is the invention called) Purpose (what the invention
does) Description (functional and/or structural) Sketch (informal
sketch) Ramifications Novel features Closest know prior art
Advantages Laboratory notebook paper paper towels. (c) 2009 Cory
Hallam or Little Commercial Value
A Patent May Have Huge or Little Commercial Value (c) 2009 Cory
Hallam PATENTABILITY VS. INFRINGEMENT
1.Everythingnew is patentable (almost) -if you add enough elements
to the claim. 2.But the more elements needed to get apatent, the
less its value (maybe zero) -because fewer accused devices
andmethods infringe. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Patent Process at UTSA
Beginning with Research
Invention Disclosure (STTM) Formal written description to
technologylicensing office Non-Disclosure Agreement Agreement for
others to see/hear aboutinvention without making it public Material
Transfer Agreement Between organizations Patent Assignment to UTSA
Regents Rules Series (www.utsystem.edu/BOR/rules.htm) License Right
to use/produce/sell invention Royalty Sharing Moneys paid for
license split amongstrecipients (university and inventors) (c) 2009
Cory Hallam Step 1 - RESEARCH 1.Research: Observations
andexperiments in UTSA laboratoriesor other research facilities
oftenlead to discoveries andinventions. An invention is anyuseful
process, machine,composition of matter, or any newor useful
improvement of thesame. Often, multiple researchersmay have
contributed to theinvention. Keeping good labnotebooks is an
important part ofthe invention process: MaintainingLaboratory
Books. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Step 2 Pre-Disclosure 2.Pre-Disclosure:
Anyearly contact with our techtransfer personnel to discussyour
invention and to provideguidance with respect to thedisclosure,
evaluation, andprotection processesdescribed below. SouthTexas
TechnologyManagement (STTM) is ourtechnology transfer
office,jointly with the UTHSCSA. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Step 3
Invention Disclosure
3.Invention Disclosure: The writtennotice of invention or
discoveries thatbegins the formal technology transferprocess. An
invention disclosure remainsa confidential document and should
fullydocument your invention so that theoptions for
commercialization can beevaluated and pursued. The disclosurehelps
establish the timing of yourinvention or discovery and assists
thelicensing specialist with evaluating thecommercial potential of
the technology.While the university owns the inventionor discovery
if a patent is pursued, it isthe inventor(s') name(s) that will
appearon the patent. Disclosure forms availableat (c) 2009 Cory
Hallam Step 4 - Assessment 4.Assessment: The period inwhich you and
your licensingspecialist review the inventiondisclosure, conduct
patent searches(if applicable), and analyze themarket and
competitive technologiesto determine the
invention'scommercialization potential. Thisevaluation process,
which may leadto a broadening or refinement of theinvention, will
guide the licensingstrategy. The four key points forassessment
include technology readiness patentability commercial potential,
and licensing potential. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Step 5 - Protection
5.Protection: The process inwhich protection for an invention
ispursued. Patent protection, acommon legal protection
method,begins with the filing of a patentapplication with the U.S.
PatentOffice and, when appropriate, foreignpatent offices. Once a
patentapplication has been filed, it typicallywill require several
years and tens ofthousands of dollars to obtain issuedU.S. and
foreign patents. Otherprotection methods include
copyright,trademark, trade secrets, andcontractual use restrictions
(e.g., fordatabases and materials). (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Step 6
Find Licensee 6.Find Licensee: STTMstaff will identify
candidatecompanies that have theexpertise, resources, andbusiness
networks to bringthe technology to market.Your active involvement
candramatically shorten thisprocess, as two thirds of alllicenses
are derived frominventor contacts. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Step 7a
Start-Up 7a.Start-up Company: If creation of anew business start-up
is being pursued,the UTSA AVP for CommercializationAlliances and
Innovation ( )will work to license to the start-up. In theevent of
faculty/staff involvement in thecompany, the appropriate Conflict
ofInterest forms (COI) will need to besubmitted and a conflict
management planwill be created. The COI office will help firsttime
faculty/staff on their COI forms. Theprocedure is fully defined
with the forms at and the COI committee can be contactedvia Martha
Reyes Trevino at (210) (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Step 7b Existing
Business
7b.Existing Business: If anexisting company is the licensee,STTM
will develop the licenseagreement. In the event ofongoing industry
partnerships, theUTSA AVP for CommercializationAlliances and
Innovation will beinvolved to ensure the long-termgrowth and
success of theserelationships. In the event thatfaculty/staff have
roles or financialinterest in the company involvedin the license,
then Conflict ofInterest (COI) forms will also needto be filed. (c)
2009 Cory Hallam Step 8 - Licensing 8.Licensing: A licenseagreement
is a contractbetween the University and athird party in which
theUniversity's rights to atechnology are licensed,without
relinquishingownership, for financial andother benefits. An
optionagreement is sometimes usedto enable a third party toevaluate
the technology for alimited time prior to making adecision about
licensing. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Step 9 - Commercialization
9.Commercialization: Thelicensee continues theadvancement of the
technologyand makes other businessinvestments to develop theproduct
or service. This stepmay entail further development,regulatory
approvals, sales andmarketing support, training,and other
activities, eventuallyresulting in sales of a productor service to
the public. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Step 10 - Revenue 10.Revenue:
Royalties and/orlicense fees are paid to theUniversity by the
Company thatobtains a license to market orcommercialize the
invention or thediscovery. To encourage furtherparticipation in the
technologytransfer process, 50% of the royaltyrevenues received by
the Universityafter patents expenses arereimbursed, are distributed
to theinventor(s) as taxable income. Allpatent costs must be
recovered bythe university before royaltydistributions are made to
theinventors. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Royalty Sharing at UTSA
Faculty 50% additional taxable income Other Discretionary accounts
for reinvestment in UTSA (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Bayh-Dole The U.S.
Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 allows universities and other non- profit
institutions to have ownership rights to discoveries resultingfrom
federally funded research, provided certain obligations aremet.
These obligations include making efforts to protect
(whenappropriate) and commercialize the discoveries,
submittingprogress reports to the funding agency, giving preference
to smallbusinesses that demonstrate sufficient capability, and
sharing anyresulting revenues with the inventors. The Bayh-Dole Act
is creditedwith stimulating interest in tech transfer activities
and generatingincreased research, commercialization, educational
opportunities,and economic development in the United State (c) 2009
Cory Hallam Office of Contracts and Industrial Agreements
(OCIA)
Affiliation Agreements; Confidential Disclosure
Agreements;Cooperative Research and Development Agreements
(CRADAs);Consortium Agreements; Limited Use Agreements;
MaterialTransfer Agreements; Memorandum of Agreement; Memorandum
ofUnderstanding; Non-Disclosure Agreements; Product
SupplierAgreements; Proprietary Information Exchange
Agreements;Research Breeding Agreements; Security Assessment
Agreements;Service Agreements (tied to sponsored program
accounts--"26"accounts); Sponsored Research Agreements; Teaming
Agreements;Testing Agreements; Subcontracts. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam
MOU A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is a writtenagreement
between parties. In the case of UTSA it maydefine the terms of a
working relationship between theuniversity, a lab, and or an
inventor and an externalparty, such as a company or research lab.
MOUs are not typically used as contractual agreements,but rather as
guidelines for working relationships. Thecontractual agreement
might take the form of asponsored research agreement (SRA) (c) 2009
Cory Hallam NDA A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is used to
enableUTSA researchers and external parties discussconfidential
and/or proprietary information. The NDA allows the parties to
engage in discussionsconcerning new discoveries and new IP. The NDA
acts as an umbrella agreement that ensuresthe information discussed
is not considered public andacts to protect the inventors from
losing rights to theinvention. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam MTA A material
transfer agreement (MTA) is usedwhen material used in a sponsored
researchagreement (SRA) is being transferred from aparty to or from
the university The MTA defines the terms of ownership anduse of the
material and what rights re affordedthe parties providing and using
the material MTAs may have long lasting terms that gobeyond the
time of the SRA (c) 2009 Cory Hallam I think I have an Invention,
What should I do?
Call STTM at when you believe you have created or
discoveredsomething unique with potential commercial or research
value. Complete and submit the Disclosure Form (seebeforepublicly
disclosing your technology or submitting a manuscript for review
andpublication. Include companies and contacts you believe might be
interested in yourinvention or who may have already contacted you
about your invention. To avoid risking your patent rights and
possibly hindering the opportunity to marketyour invention, contact
the Office of Contracts and Industrial Agreements (OCIA) toensure
you have the appropriate non-disclosure agreements in place. Some
aspects of the patent and licensing process may require
significantparticipation on your part. You will be required to
participate with the lawyers andlicensing staff in drafting the
patent material and responding to information requestsas part of
the patenting and licensing process. Keep licensing staff informed
of upcoming publications or interactions withcompanies related to
your intellectual property to ensure you are protected! (c) 2009
Cory Hallam How long does the process take?
From disclosure to having STTM render a patent filingdecision
should take 1 month. Once the patent has been filed, the patent
process however,might take years, as the United States Patent and
TrademarkOffice (PTO) currently has a 3-5 year backlog of patents
toreview. The commercialization process may take months to
yearsdepending on the level of development of the invention andthe
approval timeline for the invention. For example, newdrugs take
years to develop and achieve FDA approvalbefore sale, compared to
software that may be developedand sold in a matter of months with
no regulatory approval. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Trade Secrets
Definition: Trade secrets consist of anyvaluable information not
generally known toothers that gives its owner a economic
orcompetitive advantage and for whichreasonable steps are taken to
maintain itssecrecy (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Patents vs. Trade
Secrets
Pros: Patents protect against independent development andreverse
engineering Trade secret lost if not maintained secret Cons:
Patents have a more limited life (20 yrs vs.
indefinite);Thereafter, anyone can use The recipe for Coca-Cola has
been a trade secret for over100 years and counting Patents are more
expensive to obtain and maintain;Trade secrets cost nothing other
than expense ofkeeping secret (c) 2009 Cory Hallam YOUR TRADE
SECRETS ARE ONLY PROTECTABLE IF THE JURY FINDS THAT:
The items were relatively secret; and The defendant knew the items
were secret. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Trademarks Definition: a
trademark is a word, name, symbol, device or combination thereof
that identifies and distinguishes ones goods and services from
those of another Technically, a trademark is used to identify a
good or product and aservicemark is used to identify a service (c)
2009 Cory Hallam PROTECTABILITY OF TRADEMARKS
Generic Unprotectable (soda for a beverage or TV for a television)
Descriptive - May be protectable (Jury question: Does it primarily
describe or identify?)(such as Tax Preparation Software for a
software program thatenables users to prepare tax returns)
Suggestive Protectable(such as Greyhound for bus services and
Jaguar forautomobiles, with both marks suggesting the speed of
theirproducts; 7-ELEVEN for convenience stores) Arbitrary or
Fanciful - Very protectable(such as Kodak, Starbucks, Verizon,
Exxon) (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Trademarks How trademarks arise:
Trademarks arise through use of a mark Simple use of a mark grants
rights in the mark againstlater users in the location of use and a
reasonable area ofexpansion Can prevent use of mark on similar
products or for similarservices Federal registration, although not
required, protects themark nationwide against later confusingly
similar uses Common law also applies Can be lost if mark becomes
generic: e.g., Kleenex, Xerox (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Copyrights
Definition: Copyright is a form of protection to awide variety of
works, including literary, musical,dramatic, graphic, sculptural
and architecturalworks, motion pictures and sound recordings Not
just critically acclaimed works Extends to advertising brochures
and copy and computer programs (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Copyrights How
copyrights arise:
Copyright protection exists from the moment a work iscreated No
registration is required Copyright lasts for the authors life plus
70 years (or inthe case of works created by employees for
theiremployers, for 95 years from publication of the work or120
years from creation, whichever is shorter) (c) 2009 Cory Hallam
Copyrights What is protectable:
Copyright protects works of original authorship Includes books,
magazines, promotional materials,music, posters, movies, slide
presentations, danceroutines and website content Does not extend to
ideas, procedures, processes,systems, concepts or mere slogans,
titles or blankforms (c) 2009 Cory Hallam FY 2006 U.S. Licensing
Activity
$45 billion in R&D expenditures were received by U.S. academic
centers 697 new products introduced into the market in 2006 4,350
introduced from FY98 through FY06 553 new startup companies
launched in 2006 12,672 licenses and options were managed, yielding
active income (each single license represents a one-on-one
relationship between a company and a university, hospital or
research institution that earns income on products that benefit our
communities) 5,724 new spinouts from FY80 through FY06 (c) 2009
Cory Hallam License Income New York University $80,908,972
(Average FY Source:Association of University Technology Managers )
New York University$80,908,972 Baylor College of Medicine$
6,758,000 University of Texas - Austin $ 5,057,647 UTHSCSA $
2,211,194 UTHSC-Houston $ 1,998,947 University of Houston $ 534,053
University of Tx Med Branch $ 222,994 Texas Tech $ 157,365 Rice
University $ 122,000 (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Inventor is Key to
Commercialization
Inventor knows field Inventor knows potential licensees Inventor
can continue to invent to fill product pipeline for new ventures
Get to know the OTV Get to know the University policies this can be
very lucrative for a professor (c) 2009 Cory Hallam What You Should
Remember
Creating and commercializing new Intellectual property is a goal
forthe university and is mandated by federal law (Bayh-Dole)
forfederally funded research. The Code of Federal
Regulationsprovides information on patent rights and
responsibilities currentlyapplicable to universities under the
federally sponsored projects. Protecting intellectual property
requires filing an inventiondisclosure and working with an STTM
licensing associate PRIOR tomaking the invention public knowledge
(i.e. publication). Sponsored research might require and MOU, NDA,
MTA, or othercontractual agreement that defines the IP and
conditions for use.Make sure these have been done with the OCIA
prior to contractsigning. Protecting IP may take the form of
trademarks, copyright, tradesecrets, and patents. UTSA is committed
to world-class research leading to newinnovation, invention, and
commercialization. (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Field of Use vs.
Territory
Use Limitation Allows multiple licensees to exploit different uses
of the same technology Should Smallco limit the Field of Use?Should
Bigco demand unlimitedrights (limited only to the scope of the
Patents and Know How)? Geographical Limitation on the rightsto
exploit Patent Rights and KnowHow (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Payment
Terms Advance Fees/Upfront Fees Milestones Royalties
(c) 2009 Cory Hallam TRADEMARKSFederal registrations
COPYRIGHTSCopyright registrations
PATENTSKnow how to createvalue rely on the experts TRADE
SECRETSCreate good facts LICENSES Clarify expectations (c) 2009
Cory Hallam v1 (c) 2009 Cory Hallam Questions? Dr. Cory R. A.
Hallam 210-458-6985 [email protected]
Web Sites of Interest VPR: click on commercialization and tech
transfer STTM Licensing Associates: UT System IP Rules (Series 9000
IP): US Patent and Trademark Office: (c) 2009 Cory Hallam