1
USP<232> AND ICH Q3D ELEMENTAL IMPURITY STANDARDS FOR X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS WHAT IS X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY? Introduction After the recent publication (USP 37-NF 32) of USP chapter <735> X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry there has been increased interest in this technique in the pharmaceutical industry [1]. One of the key applications of interest is using XRF to determine elemental impurities according to USP<232> and ICH Q3D [2]. Due to this interest and current lack of XRF calibration standards for these elements in the ranges required, it was decided to investigate the possibilities of producing calibration standards for this analysis. USP<232/233> AND ICH Q3D Analytical technique for determining elemental composition. X-ray tube produces high-energy X-rays. X-rays interact with and eject inner-shell electrons. Outer-shell electrons relax into inner shell releasing X-radiation with energy characteristic for the element. Detectors determine energy and intensity of emitted radiation. USP<232/233> and ICH Q3D are new chapters/guidelines requiring testing and controlling of elemental impurities in drug products. Stipulate Permitted Daily Exposures (PDEs) for 24 potential elemental impurities across 3 administration routes (oral, parenteral, and inhalation). USP<233> describes analytical procedures for testing and includes options for alternative techniques including XRF. Table 1 shows the Oral PDEs for all of the elements in ICHQ3D with the minimum risk assessment elements in bold. cps/channel 18.5 19.0 19.5 20.0 20.5 keV Ru KA1 Rh KA1 Rh KB Pd KA1 Ru KB3 Ag KA1 Ag KA2 21.0 21.5 22.0 22.5 23.0 Ru KA2 Pd KA2 Rh KA2 Table 1. Oral Permitted Daily Exposures for elemental impurities from ICH Q3D. SETUP – STANDARDS FOR XRF Traceable sources of elemental impurities were purchased and used to spike pharmaceutical grade cellulose. Most elements required by USP and ICH Q3D are covered in these standards. Element Class Oral PDE (μg/day) Element Class Oral PDE (μg/day) Cd 1 5 Rh 2B 100 Pb 1 5 Ru 2B 100 As 1 15 Se 2B 150 Hg 1 30 Ag 2B 150 Co 2A 50 Pt 2B 100 V 2A 100 Li 3 550 Ni 2A 200 Sb 3 1200 Tl 2B 8 Ba 3 1400 Au 2B 100 Mo 3 3000 Pd 2B 100 Cu 3 3000 Ir 2B 100 Sn 3 6000 Os 2B 100 Cr 3 11000 Table 2. Elements and concentration range in XRF standards. EXTERNAL VALIDATION TESTING The calibration standards were submitted for external testing by an FDA, and ISO17025 accredited lab to confirm the expected spiking levels. A selection of the results are reported in Table 3 for the cellulose standards Element Weighed conc. (μg/g) ICP-MS conc. (μg/g) (ave±SD) (n=3) Element Weighed conc. (μg/g) ICP-MS conc. (μg/g) (ave±SD) (n=3) Cd 20 20 ± 0 Rh 50 46 ± 3 Pb 20 20 ± 1 Ru 50 48 ± 3 As 20 20 ± 0 Se 20 20 ± 1 Hg 20 21 ± 0 Pt 50 49 ± 5 Co 50 48 ± 0 Mo 20 18 ± 1 V 100 94 ± 2 Cu 65 65 ± 1 Ni 30 28 ± 1 Cr 1000 943 ± 6 Tl 20 24 ± 1 Sn 320 300 ± 0 Pd 50 45 ± 13 Sb 60 52 ± 6 Ir 50 49 ± 3 Ba 100 97 ± 2 Table 3. External lab testing results INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION To test the performance of the standards an energy dispersive XRF spectrometer of Malvern Panalytical, an Epsilon 4, was calibrated. 5 grams of sample was prepared as pressed pellets for analysis. Total measurement time per sample was 65 minutes (can be shortened depending on number of elements, sample size and accuracy/precision requirements). LOQ calculated as 10 times the standard deviation on a blank sample. 12 As concentration (μg/g) Intensity (cps) 24 36 48 68 72 84 96 12 Pb concentration (μg/g) Intensity (cps) 24 36 48 68 72 84 96 Table 4. Calibration results. METHOD ACCURACY DETERMINATION To determine accuracy we measured three validation samples, covering together all 20 elements. Results for all 20 elements are shown in Table 5. Element Correlation LOQ (μg/g) Element Correlation LOQ (μg/g) Cd 0.9997 0.7 Rh 0.9998 0.8 Pb 0.9995 0.1 Ru 0.9999 0.8 As 0.9998 0.1 Se 0.9999 0.1 Hg 0.9999 0.1 Pt 0.9999 0.1 Co 0.9998 0.6 Mo 0.9999 0.2 V 0.9998 0.3 Cu 0.9999 0.2 Ni 0.9999 0.3 Cr 0.9999 0.5 Tl 0.9999 0.1 Sb 0.9999 3.7 Pd 0.9999 0.6 Sn 0.9999 4.5 Ir 0.9999 0.2 Ba 0.9979 0.5 Table 5. Recovery results for the validation measurement Conclusions This work shows the development of new pharmaceutical standard reference materials to aid X-ray fluorescence spectrometry users to meet new elemental impurity regulations. REFERENCES [1] United States Pharmacopeial convention (USP 37-NF 32) [2] ICH Q3D Quality guidelines (http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/article/quality-guidelines.html) Element Conc. range (μg/g) Element Conc. Range (μg/g) Cd 0 - 100 Rh 0 - 200 Pb 0 - 100 Ru 0 - 200 As 0 - 100 Se 0 - 200 Hg 0 - 100 Pt 0 - 200 Co 0 - 100 Mo 0 - 400 V 0 - 200 Cu 0 - 400 Ni 0 - 200 Cr 0 - 500 Tl 0 - 200 Sn 0 - 1000 Pd 0 - 200 Sb 0 - 300 Ir 0 - 200 Ba 0 - 200 Element Given conc. (μg/g) Results (μg/g) Element Given conc. (μg/g) Results (μg/g) Cd 20.1 20.3 Rh 50 50.9 Pb 20 18.4 Ru 50 49.0 As 19.9 20.3 Se 20.1 19.6 Hg 20 19.7 Pt 50 52.0 Co 50 51.2 Mo 20 19.6 V 100 101.7 Cu 65 62.3 Ni 30 29.6 Cr 1000 999.0 Tl 19.9 19.0 Sb 60 62.4 Pd 50 49.7 Sn 320 331.7 Ir 50 51.2 Ba 100 100.7

USP 232 and ICH Q3D Elemental impurity standards …...USP AND ICH Q3D ELEMENTAL IMPURITY STANDARDS FOR X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS Y. Xiao M. oontes T. Soteriou L. eenaers

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: USP 232 and ICH Q3D Elemental impurity standards …...USP AND ICH Q3D ELEMENTAL IMPURITY STANDARDS FOR X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS Y. Xiao M. oontes T. Soteriou L. eenaers

USP<232> AND ICH Q3D ELEMENTAL IMPURITY STANDARDS FOR X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSISY. Xiao , M. Zoontjes, T. Soteriou, L. Kempenaers , Malvern Panalytical B.V. Lelyweg 1 (7602 EA), PO Box 13, 7600 AA Almelo, the Netherlands,L. Grimsley , M. Ingham, Malvern Panalytical Nottingham, Tollerton hall, Nottingham, NG12 4GQ, UKe-mail: [email protected]

WHAT IS X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY?

IntroductionAfter the recent publication (USP 37-NF 32) of USP chapter <735> X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry there has been increased interest in this technique in the pharmaceutical industry [1]. One of the key applications of interest is using XRF to determine elemental impurities according to USP<232> and ICH Q3D [2]. Due to this interest and current lack of XRF calibration standards for these elements in the ranges required, it was decided to investigate the possibilities of producing calibration standards for this analysis.

USP<232/233> AND ICH Q3D

• Analytical technique for determining elemental composition.• X-ray tube produces high-energy X-rays.• X-rays interact with and eject inner-shell electrons.• Outer-shell electrons relax into inner shell releasing X-radiation with energy characteristic for the

element.• Detectors determine energy and intensity of emitted radiation.

• USP<232/233> and ICH Q3D are new chapters/guidelines requiring testing and controlling of elemental impurities in drug products.

• Stipulate Permitted Daily Exposures (PDEs) for 24 potential elemental impurities across 3 administration routes (oral, parenteral, and inhalation).

• USP<233> describes analytical procedures for testing and includes options for alternative techniques including XRF.

• Table 1 shows the Oral PDEs for all of the elements in ICHQ3D with the minimum risk assessment elements in bold.

cps/

chan

nel

18.5 19.0 19.5 20.0 20.5keV

Ru KA1 Rh KA1

Rh KB

Pd KA1

Ru KB3

Ag KA1

Ag KA2

21.0 21.5 22.0 22.5 23.0

Ru KA2Pd KA2Rh KA2

Table 1. Oral Permitted Daily Exposures for elemental impurities from ICH Q3D.

SETUP – STANDARDS FOR XRF• Traceable sources of elemental impurities were purchased and used to spike pharmaceutical grade

cellulose.• Most elements required by USP and ICH Q3D are covered in these standards.

Element Class Oral PDE (μg/day) Element Class Oral PDE (μg/day)

Cd 1 5 Rh 2B 100

Pb 1 5 Ru 2B 100

As 1 15 Se 2B 150

Hg 1 30 Ag 2B 150

Co 2A 50 Pt 2B 100

V 2A 100 Li 3 550

Ni 2A 200 Sb 3 1200

Tl 2B 8 Ba 3 1400

Au 2B 100 Mo 3 3000

Pd 2B 100 Cu 3 3000

Ir 2B 100 Sn 3 6000

Os 2B 100 Cr 3 11000

Table 2. Elements and concentration range in XRF standards.

EXTERNAL VALIDATION TESTING• The calibration standards were submitted for external testing by an FDA, and ISO17025 accredited

lab to confirm the expected spiking levels. • A selection of the results are reported in Table 3 for the cellulose standards

Element Weighed conc. (μg/g)

ICP-MS conc. (μg/g) (ave±SD) (n=3)

Element Weighed conc. (μg/g)

ICP-MS conc. (μg/g) (ave±SD) (n=3)

Cd 20 20 ± 0 Rh 50 46 ± 3

Pb 20 20 ± 1 Ru 50 48 ± 3

As 20 20 ± 0 Se 20 20 ± 1

Hg 20 21 ± 0 Pt 50 49 ± 5

Co 50 48 ± 0 Mo 20 18 ± 1

V 100 94 ± 2 Cu 65 65 ± 1

Ni 30 28 ± 1 Cr 1000 943 ± 6

Tl 20 24 ± 1 Sn 320 300 ± 0

Pd 50 45 ± 13 Sb 60 52 ± 6

Ir 50 49 ± 3 Ba 100 97 ± 2

Table 3. External lab testing results

INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION• To test the performance of the standards an energy dispersive XRF spectrometer of

Malvern Panalytical, an Epsilon 4, was calibrated.• 5 grams of sample was prepared as pressed pellets for analysis.• Total measurement time per sample was 65 minutes (can be shortened depending on number of

elements, sample size and accuracy/precision requirements).• LOQ calculated as 10 times the standard deviation on a blank sample.

12As concentration (µg/g)

Inte

nsity

(cps

)

24 36 48 68 72 84 96 12Pb concentration (µg/g)

Inte

nsity

(cps

)

24 36 48 68 72 84 96

Table 4. Calibration results.

METHOD ACCURACY DETERMINATION• To determine accuracy we measured three validation samples, covering together all 20 elements.• Results for all 20 elements are shown in Table 5.

Element Correlation LOQ (μg/g) Element Correlation LOQ (μg/g)

Cd 0.9997 0.7 Rh 0.9998 0.8

Pb 0.9995 0.1 Ru 0.9999 0.8

As 0.9998 0.1 Se 0.9999 0.1

Hg 0.9999 0.1 Pt 0.9999 0.1

Co 0.9998 0.6 Mo 0.9999 0.2

V 0.9998 0.3 Cu 0.9999 0.2

Ni 0.9999 0.3 Cr 0.9999 0.5

Tl 0.9999 0.1 Sb 0.9999 3.7

Pd 0.9999 0.6 Sn 0.9999 4.5

Ir 0.9999 0.2 Ba 0.9979 0.5

Table 5. Recovery results for the validation measurement

ConclusionsThis work shows the development of new pharmaceutical standard reference materials to aid X-ray fluorescence spectrometry users to meet new elemental impurity regulations.

REFERENCES[1] United States Pharmacopeial convention (USP 37-NF 32)[2] ICH Q3D Quality guidelines (http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/article/quality-guidelines.html)

Element Conc. range (μg/g) Element Conc. Range (μg/g)

Cd 0 - 100 Rh 0 - 200Pb 0 - 100 Ru 0 - 200As 0 - 100 Se 0 - 200Hg 0 - 100 Pt 0 - 200Co 0 - 100 Mo 0 - 400V 0 - 200 Cu 0 - 400Ni 0 - 200 Cr 0 - 500Tl 0 - 200 Sn 0 - 1000Pd 0 - 200 Sb 0 - 300Ir 0 - 200 Ba 0 - 200

Element Given conc. (μg/g)

Results (μg/g) Element Given conc. (μg/g)

Results (μg/g)

Cd 20.1 20.3 Rh 50 50.9

Pb 20 18.4 Ru 50 49.0

As 19.9 20.3 Se 20.1 19.6

Hg 20 19.7 Pt 50 52.0

Co 50 51.2 Mo 20 19.6

V 100 101.7 Cu 65 62.3

Ni 30 29.6 Cr 1000 999.0

Tl 19.9 19.0 Sb 60 62.4

Pd 50 49.7 Sn 320 331.7

Ir 50 51.2 Ba 100 100.7