35
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri

Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri

  • View
    223

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Using the Missouri P index

John A. Lory, Ph.D.

Division of Plant Sciences

Commercial Agriculture Program

University of Missouri

Many streams and lakes are phosphorus limited.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200

Total Phosphorus (ppb)

Ozark HighlandsOthers

Jones and Knowlton 1993

Wat e

r C

lari

ty a

s m

easu

r ed

by

Secch

i d

ep

th (

m) Missouri reservoirs

Challenge:

Where,

when,

and how to apply manure

to minimize P loss to surface

water.

Nutrient planners are required to assess phosphorus loss on all fields receiving manure.

LowN-based Applications

MediumN-based Applications

HighP-based Applications

VeryHigh

No Manure Applications

Phosphorus Loss Assessment

You choose the method

Agronomic soil test recommendation Objective: does the crop need P?

Phosphorus threshold

Phosphorus Index Objective: will applied P be vulnerable to

losses?

Missouri’s approach: 2 choices

Agronomic soil test recommendation Objective: does the crop need P?

Phosphorus threshold

Phosphorus Index Objective: will applied P be vulnerable to

losses?

Soil testing objective

Determine crop needs for phosphorus

(P) to maximize yield.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 10 20 30 40 50

Soil Test P (lb acre-1)

Dry

Matt

er

(g

)

Critical value = 43 lb/ac

Soil test P

Yie

ld

Low Medium High Very High

Critical Value

Soil testing objective

The “critical value” is the lowest soil test

level where no response to fertilizer is

expected.

Soil test P

Low Medium High Very High

Critical Value

Soil testing objective

Critical soil test P

= 40 or 45 lbs P/acreY

ield

Soil testing objective

Critical soil test P

= 40 or 45 lbs P/acre

Soil test P

Yie

ld

Low Medium High Very High

Critical Value

Buildup Maintain NoneFertilizer Rec.:

LowN-based Applications

MediumN-based Applications

HighP-based Applications

VeryHigh

No Manure Applications

Soil test P

Yie

ld

Low Medium High Very High

Critical Value

Buildup Maintain NoneFertilizer Rec.:

Soil test P

Yie

ld

Low Medium High Very High

Critical Value

Buildup Maintain NoneFertilizer Rec.:

Missouri’s approach: 2 choices

Agronomic soil test recommendation Objective: does the crop need P?

Phosphorus threshold

Phosphorus Index Objective: will applied P be vulnerable to

losses?

Runoff volume Method of application Time since application Application rate Soil test P Soil type Cultivation Vegetative cover

Factors affecting runoff of P

P indexes are state specific.

Index Target:

- Runoff- Irrigation

- Runoff- Irrigation Long-term

Runoff

- Runoff- Leaching

P indexes are state specific.

Approach:

Multiplicative tabular factors

Simplified model

Additive tabular factors Simplified

model

Do Differences Between StatesMake Sense?

?

P index developed cooperatively by MU and NRCS.

Based on best professional judgment.

Available as a spreadsheet at: http://nmplanner.missouri.edu/

Missouri P index objectives

Strategic planning tool for use in writing a 5-year nutrient management plan.

Identify fields where field characteristics are likely to result in high P loss in runoff.

Simple to use with readily available information for people with an NRCS conservation plan.

6 Factors in the Missouri P index Soil test result

include units and sampling depth Tillage

Tilled vs. notill and forages RUSLE estimate of erosion Land cover Soil hydrologic group

A, B, C or D Distance from water feature

Simple model approach

Sediment P Function of RUSLE-2 erosion, soil test P

and sediment delivery ratio.

Soluble P Function of runoff volume (curve number

approach) and soil test P.

Higher standard in the clear-water region of the state.

P index rating system

Rating Clear-water region Other

Low <1 <3

Medium >1 and <5 >3 and <7

High >5 and <10 >7 and <12

Very High >10 >12

Higher standard in the clear-water region of the state.

Surface applications require a tactical tool. Educational tools being developed to identify

times of year runoff least likely

Inputs: Ground cover - County Soil hydrologic group - Soil condition Soil moisture

Output Evaluation of runoff risk (low, medium, high) Predicted rainfall amount needed to initiate

runoff

Future

P index integrated into RUSLE 2

Email notification system to help evaluate timing of manure applications.