33
Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey Kathryn Everest Director, Strategy Consulting Jive Software

Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

  • Upload
    jovita

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey. Kathryn Everest Director, Strategy Consulting Jive Software. What is Social Network Analysis (SNA)?. A set of methods and metrics that shows how entities interact … - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice:

A Methodological Journey

Kathryn EverestDirector, Strategy Consulting

Jive Software

Page 2: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

What is Social Network Analysis (SNA)?

• A set of methods and metrics that shows how entities interact …– the current patterns of communication, information-sharing, decision-making and innovation within

a particular organization or group – Focuses on three elements:

• A group of entities (in this case researchers and institutions) and the roles they play• The relationship between the entities• And attributes might be present that are creating a bias in the relationship of the entities

– When applied to organizations, it can be referred to as ONA – Organizational Network Analysis

• The outcome of an SNA…– helps us to see where collaboration is breaking down, where talent and expertise could be better

leveraged, where information is getting bogged down or where opportunities for innovation are being lost

• SNA data…– gives us the picture we need to create a set of remedial actions for individuals, influencers and

stakeholder to improve productivity, efficiency and innovation

Page 3: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

The entities, the relationship between entities, and the attributes of the entities are depicted in SNA maps

Social Entities People (Researchers, Health

Professionals, Experts)

Resources (Collaborative spaces, Information repositories)

Relationship Information sharing Advice Collaboration Trust Awareness Access

Attributes Contributing factors such as

location, tenure, specialty, language, funding, culture

Page 4: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

SNA also provides insights about roles within the network, as well as metrics that allow us to measure where we are and

where we want to be

Network MeasuresDensity = 6%Cohesion = 4Centrality = 6

Central People DPa(34), CR(29), BB(20), MDo(19),DPr(17)

Roles Central roles – those who

many people go to (or could be bottleneck)

Peripheral people - goes to others but no-one goes to them

Boundary Spanners – connects different groups

Brokers – connects many people

Isolate - not connected

Density --- Robustness of network (group measure) Number of connections that exist in the group out of 100% possible in that network General level of linkage. More points connected means quicker and more accurate information flow

Cohesion --- Ease with which a network can connect Distance is the shortest path between two people Aggregate measure at network level reflects average distance between people

Centrality --- Identifies influential people (individual measure) Number of direct connections that individuals have with others in group Individuals who have more ties to others may be in more advantaged positions; they may have access to more of the information or knowledge in the network

Page 5: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Why do an SNA?

Page 6: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Awareness Network - Density = 4.83% 861 Ties

1: Geo 1 (Red)2: Geo 2 (Pink)3: Geo 3 (Black)4: Geo 4 (Dark Blue)5: Geo 5 (Grey)

1: Area 1 (Circle) 2: Area 2 (Square)3: Area 3 (Up Triangle)4: Area 4 (Plus)5: Area 5 (Down Triangle)

Develop “before and after” measurements (e.g. What impact has your community had on the network?)

Page 7: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

The SNA can provide understand the potential impact losing core researchers to a network

Research collaboration with core researchers

Research collaboration without core researchers

Sample hypothesis: Without core XX researchers, collaboration supporting XXX research would be severely affected

Page 8: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Identify issues and opportunities in the network

N Ind/Pri Hosp Rehab Col/Uni Other

Individual/Private 14 24% 8% 31% 16% 20%

Hospitals 9 6% 17% 19% 15% 6%

Rehab Facility 10 29% 20% 27% 29% 36%

College/University 8 11% 14% 16% 20% 14%

Other 7 22% 6% 36% 30% 43%Note – Removed Gov/Agency and K-12

Page 9: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Identify Brokers

Liaison

GatekeeperRepresentative

Consultant

Consultant

Name Name Name Name Name Name

Representative

Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name

Liaison

Name Name Name Name Name Name

Gatekeeper

Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name

Page 10: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Out In

Mean 6.425 6.425

Std Dev. 4.53 3.33

Min 0 1

Max 21 17

Measure and identify issues in individual networks

Page 11: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Understand the makeup of your network

Out-degree

In-d

egre

e

Framework Source: Steve Borgatti

Authority

Low Involvement

High Involvement

Apprentice

Notes: Removed all nodes with a 0 out-degreeHigher in-degree and out-degree than the mean

13

1016

11

Page 12: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Provide a perspective of a person and their network

In-degree

Out-degree Mean

Aware 11

SME 10

Betweenness 51.4

Comm-Daily 1.2

Comm-Weekly + 1.8

Comm-Weekly 3.3

Comm-Monthly 6.5

XX XXX Other H *

% % %

Centrality

Network Composition by Location

Description: Awareness: Awareness describes a person is aware of the knowledge and skills of others in the network. In-degree reflects the number of people who indicated that they believe they are aware of your knowledge and skills. Out-degree reflects the number of people you selected as being aware of their knowledge and skills. The mean represents the mean or median number of the network.

SME: SME describes whether a person will call upon another person when looking for expertise related to TOC topics. In-degree reflects the number of people who indicated that they would call upon you for expertise. Out-degree reflects the number of people you selected you would call upon. The mean represents the mean or median number of the network.

Betweenness – Betweenness describes how often you fall between two people in the network. The Mean of the network is 51.4 with a maximum value of 533.

Comm: Comm (Communications) relates to how many people communicate with each other on a daily, weekly+ (once or more per week), weekly (once a week or less), or monthly (once a month or less). In-degree reflects the number of people who indicated they communicate with you, and out-degree reflects the people you selected. The mean represents the mean or median number of the network.

Network Composition by Location: This is analysis looks at location of the people in your network. XX represents the percentage of people in your network who are located in XX, XXX represents the percentage who are located in XXX, and Other represents locations other than XX and XXX. H is the value which represents the heterogeneity of your network. H is a number between 0 and 1 with 1 representing a maximum value. The average result was .46.

Page 13: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Example

In-degree

Out-degree Mean

Aware 12 11 11

SME 8 11 10

Betweenness 25 54.4

Comm-Daily 2 2 1.2

Comm-Weekly + 0 1 1.8

Comm-Weekly 2 4 3.3

Comm-Monthly 8 1 6.5

XX XXX Other H *

50% 31% 19% .617

Centrality

Network Composition by Location

Page 14: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

How do you do an SNA?

1. Gather attribute/demographic and relationship data– Getting the data from public sources / mining data– Survey (bounded and unbounded)

2. Analyze the data– Pick a tool (I use UCINet, but there are others including NodeXL,

Pajek, InFlow just to name a few)

And there is a lot to both

Page 15: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

I use Optimice – http://www.onasurveys.com

Page 16: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

To use it, you need to register for an Optimice account

There is no charge to create and account, develop and administer a survey

A “free” account however only allows you to download a subset of the data

An account is $75USD per month or $599 per year

You only need to have a valid account when you download data

You can conduct as many surveys as you want, with as many people as you want

You can allow your account to lapse and your data is maintained

They will expunge data on request

Page 17: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

1. Log in (after you create your account)

Page 18: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

2. Create a new survey

Page 19: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

19

3. About the survey

Page 20: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

3. Cont’d

Page 21: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

21

Create an introductory email to attach the survey (should reference another communication which puts the project in context)

Dear {Name}

• What is this project?• Why are you asking these questions?• What will happen to the results?• Will people see how I answered?• When will I hear more?

Signed by,

To answer the survey please click on this link: {URL}

Page 22: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

22

4. About Respondents – (traditional survey and attribute questions)

Page 23: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Sun Life Financial SMCS - IBM/SLF Confidential | Apr 22, 2023

23

Respondent List

Page 24: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Sun Life Financial SMCS - IBM/SLF Confidential | Apr 22, 2023

24

Creating the list of participants

Notes:

First two columns MUST BE: “Name” and “Email”

Create as a CSV file to upload to the survey tool

No spaces in the headings

Page 25: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

25

5. About Relationship (Network Questions) – Note: the more names you have, the fewer questions you should

consider. Make your questions count!!

Checkbox

Page 26: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Choice Across and Down

Page 27: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Matrix Question

Page 28: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Testing the survey

Page 29: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Monitor / Test

Page 30: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

30

Tracking Progress – Two ways

Page 31: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

31

When the data is collected, download the data

Page 32: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

Analyze Data

Page 33: Using Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Communities of Practice: A Methodological Journey

What can you do? Way too much to cover, so be focused about what you need