Upload
brandon-perkins
View
213
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Using Data to Guide School and District Change presented by Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District, NJ
To hear this webinar you will need to choose your audio mode.
Go to the control panel in the upper right corner of your screen and click the button of how you will be listening. Your choices:
Use telephone Use mic & speakers
If using mic & speakers make sure your volume is turned up so you can hear
If using the telephone Dial: 213-286-1201 Access Code: 181-694-285Audio PIN: unique PIN shown in audio control panel on screen
Technical difficulties? Contact Debra Light at (518) 723-2071.
www.LeaderEd.com
All participants are on mute.
Webinar Guidelines
• All participants are on mute during the entire webinar.
• Presentation portion will be 45 minutes
• Questions and Answers portion will be 15 minutes
• To ask a question type it in the question control panel in the upper right corner of your screen. Content questions will be answered in the order they were received at the end
of the webinar presentation.
We will send you a follow up email with the PowerPoint presentation and helpful resources
www.leadered.com
Using Data to Implement Change
Cheryl Dyer
Assistant SuperintendentBridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
ICLE Consultant
Webinar Objectives
• Participants will:– Examine macro level and micro level types of
data– Understand the relationships among content,
the nature and needs of the learner and the expectations of the community as they relate to program evaluations and change
– Become familiar with resources available from ICLE to make data manageable
6
Focus Activity
• Make a mental list of words and phrases that come to mind when you think of “data.”
Frequently Listed Words and Phrases
• A sea of information
• Formative assessments
• Standardized test scores
• Overwhelming
• Time consuming to analyze
• Mind boggling
8
Data Provides a Roadmap
• Where are we as a district?
• Where do we want to go?
• How do we want to get there?
• Managers keep the system in place and minimize risk, we need leadership for improvement!
9
Lead the way~
“The essential task of leadership in business, in education, in family life, and in public life is to inspire, to teach, to act with courage, to live with honor and to show the way.” Gerald Ford
Abraham Lincoln once said (paraphrased): "Good leaders take people where they want to go while great leaders take people where they ought to go."
Leading Change in High Schools
• Information, ideas and best practices related to key principles of change
• The most current research and models to craft school-wide solutions
• Practical advice, insight, and effective tools to improve high schools
Preview this publication at http://store.leadered.com/
DATA USE: ARE YOU IN QUADRANT A, B, C OR D?
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
Rigor/Relevance FrameworkRigor/Relevance Framework
The administration understands the data and can explain it to others, but they haven’t been able to drill down and develop programs to address concerns
Application of low level analysis: the administrator uses the data to identify of groups of students who are ‘at-risk’ or in need of something different
The administrators use the data to evaluate programs and design adaptations that meet the needs of the students and the expectations of the community without sacrificing the integrity of the discipline
Putting data in the hands of the administrators: they have “acquired it,” it’s in a nice binder!
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
Rigor/Relevance FrameworkRigor/Relevance Framework
Teachers understand the data, but don’t know how to use it to design lessons or formative assessments or develop interventions.
Application of low level analysis: The teacher can sort students into high and low groups of achievement. “At-risk” students are identified.
The teachers use the data to design lessons to address skill gaps and evaluate the effectiveness of those lessons through formative assessments, and differentiate to meet learner needs through research-based interventions!
Putting data in the hands of the teacher: they have “acquired it,” it’s in a nice binder!
14
Where are we?
• Moving to “Great”– How do we define great?
• Curriculum• Instruction
– How far away is great?• What is the benchmark?• Where are we now?
– How do we get there?• Put the right people on the bus in the right seats• Make sure the driver has GPS!
Big Picture Data
• What do we believe? – Philosophy
• How prepared are we? – Staff demographics
• What is our community like?– Socioeconomic status
Philosophy 101
• Understanding our beliefs– Basic premise: What we believe about how
children learn influences how we teach!– Think back to those child psychology classes
and educational theory classes.– What have you internalized about educational
philosophy?
Essentialists Believe:
• Skills must be taught first.
• Basic skills and facts are necessary for future learning.
• Teachers must provide students with foundational knowledge.
• The main goal of education is develop the intellect.
Essentialists Believe:
• The pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is good in itself.
• We need to get back to basics!
• Students need rewards and punishments to learn.
• Not everyone has the potential for academic success.
Constructivists Believe:
• The curriculum must be relevant to the lives of the learners.
• Teaching must be based on the method of intelligence.
• Learning activities must be designed based on the needs of the students.
• The curriculum must be integrated in order for students to make sense of their learning.
Constructivists Believe:
• Students learn best through problem-solving and collaboration.
• The goal of education is transfer.• Skills must be learned in context, not in
isolation. • Education is a process of growth.• When learning activities are relevant,
rewards and punishments are unnecessary.
The Curriculum Wars
The Content
Explicit InstructionDiscovery Learning
Can you be somewhere along the continuum?
Sitting in the Middle of the See Saw
• Do some beliefs conflict with one another?– Students should not have a choice in their
education. They are immature and unable to judge for themselves.
– The school should be a great smorgasbord of intellectual, artistic, creative and athletic activities, from which each child could take whatever he wanted, and as much as he wanted, or as little.
Can we trust them to choose vegetables?
Less Big Picture Data
• What programs do we have? – Curriculum
• Is it aligned with the state? – Curriculum matrix
• Is it rigorous and relevant?– Lesson Plan Analysis
• What does our community expect?– Survey data
25
What is a Program Evaluation?
• The First Step in the Curriculum Renewal Process
• The basis and catalyst for curriculum renewal• A mechanism to critically review existing
curriculum in a systematic and collaborative manner
• A means of determining whether the existing curriculum is meeting the needs of the learner, the expectations of the community and is true to the discipline (curriculum paradigm)
26
How It Works:
• Five Year and Five Stage Process– Year One/Stage One~ Program Evaluation,
Review and Research– Year Two/Stage Two~ Curriculum
Development– Year Three/Stage Three~ Initial
Implementation– Years Four and Five/Stages Four and Five~
Full Implementation, Monitoring and Assessment
27
The Cycle
Program Evaluation
Curriculum Development
Implementation and Assessment
28
Year One/Stage One
• Process of comparing the actual program to the ideal program– Research, comparisons, surveys, analysis of student
achievement
• Preparation of the Program Evaluation Report– Overview, Description of Changes, Philosophy,
Comparison Data, Perception of Program, Evidence of Effectiveness, Commendations, Recommendations, Timeline for Implementation of Recommendations
ICLE Resources for Year One
• We Lead, We Teach, We Learn Surveys
• Curriculum Matrix
• National Essential Skills Study
• White Papers on Researched Best Practices
• Gold Seal Lessons
www.successfulpractices.org
It’s Time to LeadUpdated March 20, 2009
We Learn Student Survey – 70,358
We Teach Instructional Staff Survey – 6,554
We Lead Whole Staff Survey – 12,430
31
Year Two/Stage Two
• Curriculum Development– Revisions
• Might take place in years three and four• Summer Curriculum Writing
– New Course Development• Two-year process• Summer Curriculum Writing
– Textbook Adoption Recommendations• Budgeting and Purchasing
ICLE Resources for Year Two
• Curriculum Matrix
• National Essential Skills Study
• White Papers on Researched Best Practices
• Gold Seal Lessons
• Successful Practices Network
• Crosswalks state standards to state tests in English, math, and science and to the Essential Skills
• High, medium, and low priorities assigned
• Professional development activities and 150 Gold Seal Lessons
To learn more, order or view excerpt: http://store.leadered.com
Curriculum Matrix series
Achieving AYP Using State-specific Curriculum Matrix Data
34
Choosing Districts for Comparison
• Criteria– Similar demographics
• Socioeconomic status (DFG)• Diversity: Limited English Proficient, Special
Education, Racial and Ethnic groups
– Similar configuration• K-12
– Similar size• According to the NJ DOE “large” is a district
with more than 3,500 total students
35
The Comparison Group
Bernards Township Montgomery
Flemington-Raritan Princeton
Hillsborough South Brunswick
Holmdel Watchung Hills
Hunterdon Central Warren
Long Hill West Windsor-Plainsboro
36
Is Our Current Model Working?
Achievement data from 2006 and 2007 NJ ASK for Language Arts
Literacy reveals that it is not working!
Small Picture Data
• How are the students doing? – Assessment data
• How do they compare to others? – Assessment data
• Are they making progress from year to year?– Assessment data
38
Student Data:School 2006 3 LAL 2007 3 LAL 2006 4 LAL 2007 4 LAL
BRRSD 11.7 13.1 16.3 16.8
DFG 7.6 7.3 8.6 8.7
Bernards 4.3 3.6 4.4 3.1
Hillsborough 9.0 7.3 8.3 7.9
Montgomery 5.9 9.2 8.0 7.7
Warren 3.9 4.8 5.3 3.5
Watchung 1.3 8.0 0 2.7
Princeton 3.5 10.9 8.5 7.4
West-Windsor 4.5 3.5 7.3 6.8
Flemington-Raritan 8.4 6.1 8.4 8.6
South Brunswick 10.6 12.0 13.5 11.3
Holmdel 6.5 5.0 5.4 7.4
Long Hill 10.3 16.3 6.3 11.6
Chatham 3.1 3.4 4.1 3.4
% of Total Students partially proficient by grade level
39
Student Data:
School 2006 3 LAL 2007 3 LAL 2006 4 LAL 2007 4 LAL
BRRSD 11.7 13.1 16.3 16.8
DFG 7.6 7.3 8.6 8.7
Bernards 4.3 3.6 4.4 3.1
Warren 3.9 4.8 5.3 3.5
Chatham 3.1 3.4 4.1 3.4
% of Total Students partially proficient by grade level
40
Student Data:
School 2006 3 LAL 2007 3 LAL 2006 4 LAL 2007 4 LAL
BRRSD 7.3 9.5 10.9 11.8
DFG 3.5 3.8 4.1 4.1
Bernards 2.1 1.4 1.1 1.4
Warren 0.5 1.4 1.0 0.5
Chatham 1.2 1.2 2.2 0.4
% of General Education students partially proficient by grade level
41
Student Data:
School % in SE 2007 3 LAL % in SE 2007 4 LAL
BRRSD 9.5 47.0 11.6 51.1
DFG 12.6 21.2 15.0 32.5
Bernards 18.5 13.3 14.0 13.3
Warren 12.2 30.0 15.0 21.1
Chatham 12.6 18.9 14.3 21.4
% of SE Students partially proficient by grade level
42
Reading Recovery Results
School # in RR in 1st Grade
# Discontinued
# PP on 3rd Grade NJ ASK
Recomm. Action
Action Taken # PP on 3rd Grade NJ ASK
Adamsville 26 19 (73%) 7 (36%) 5 4 SE, 1 MLS 4 (80%)
Bradley Gardens
18 14 (77%) 3 (21%) 1 1 MLS 0
Crim 26 20 (77%) 6 (30%) 6 4 SE, 2 MLS 4 (67%)
Hamilton 20 18 (90%) 4 (22%) 1 1 SE 1 (100%)
JFK 18 10 (55%) 5 (50%) 4 2 SE, 2 MLS 3 (75%)
Milltown 16 9 (56%) 2 (22%) 7 5 SE, 2 MLS 3 (43%)
Van Holten 19 12 (63%) 2 (17%) 7 2 SE, 3 MLS 3 (43%)
% in Partially Proficient ranges from 17% to 50% for Discontinued students,
% of Partially Proficient ranges from 43% to 100% for Recommended Action
43
Analysis of Reading Recovery Results
• Why aren’t all of the successful students successful on the NJ ASK two years later?– Lack of systematic Tier 2 and additional Tier 3
intervention after 1st grade
• What accounts for the high percentage of “Partially Proficient” scores among the “Recommended Action” group of students?– Students needs are addressed by MLS Assistants– Lack of clearly defined, evidence/research based Tier
2 and Tier 3 interventions for this group!
44
Language Arts 3-8
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th
Grade
% A
t o
r A
bo
ve S
tate
S
tan
dar
d 2006
2007
2008
Overview of Grades 3-11 LAL: Total Students
5th, 6th and 7th grade results show the effect of the increased rigor of the revised tests in 2008.
45
Trend Data for 3rd Grade
Third Grade LAL
0
5
10
15
20
25
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
% P
arti
ally
Pro
fici
ent BRRSD
DFG I
State
Bernards
Warren
Chatham
Overall, students perform better than the state, but worse than the DFG and worse than districts in the comparison group.
46
Trend Data 3rd Grade
3rd Grade Advanced Proficient
0
5
10
15
20
25
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
% A
dva
nce
d P
rofi
cien
t
BRRSD
DFG I
State
Bernards
Warren
Chatham
We have more students in advanced proficient than in the state overall, but less than the DFG and considerably less than in comparison districts.
47
Trend Data for 11th Grade
11th Grade LAL
0
5
10
15
20
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
% P
arti
ally
Pro
fici
ent
BRRHS
DFG I
State
Bernards
Watchung
Montgomery
In 2006, the % of partially proficient students was almost identical to the DFG. In 2007 and 2008, the DFG ‘out scored’ the district.
48
Year Three/Stage ThreeThe “What are We Going to Do About it?” Stage
• Initial Implementation– Curriculum is put into practice– Focus on Staff Development– Feedback from teachers, parents, and
students– Mid-course adjustments are made if
necessary– Revisions are made if needed
49
How is this information being used to meet student needs?
• Professional Development for special education and general education– Four rounds of grade level training combining special
education and grade level teachers– Job embedded training through the literacy coach
and supervisors– Training for pull-out replacement resource teachers
in grades 5-12– Training for teachers of self-contained SE students in
grades K-12
50
How is this information being used to meet student needs?
• Literacy Initiative at the HS– Required weekly writing– Required writing in all content areas
• Formative Assessments• Six-week Summer Literacy Program
– Use of NCLB funds for economically disadvantaged and LEP students
51
How is this information being used to meet student needs?
• Intervention Specialists• Supplemental resources for special education
and general education– Fundations– Intervention Stations– Phonics– Words Their Way– Study Island– Versatiles
52
Years Four and Five
• Full implementation– Student achievement data is gathered and
analyzed as a function of the change– Strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum
are determined
ICLE Resources for Years 3-5
• Gold Seal Lessons
• Successful Practices Network
• Consultants for Staff Development
• Resource Binders for Staff Development– Using Assessment for Instruction– Improving Performance for Special Education
Students– How Brain Research Impacts Instruction
54
Do We Have Hidden Beliefs?• Do we really believe that students should
be challenged to reach their full potential?– Then why is participation in Advanced
Placement and honors kept low via complicated entrance criteria?
• Do we really believe in a balanced curriculum?– Then why do parents still think we refuse to
teach phonics and traditional math algorithms?
55
How Did We Get Here?
• Too much emphasis on self-esteem
• Not enough emphasis on self-control
• Expectations that are too low
• Over-scheduling of children
• A culture of self-indulgence– No pain~ lots of expected gain– Sense of entitlement
56
The Bottom Line
• Don’t be afraid to ask the tough questions.
• Admit when something isn’t getting the results that you want.
• Resist complacency!
• Expect as much from others (including students) as you expect from yourself!
57
More Bottom Line
• In order for people to ‘buy in’ to change, they need to know:– What needs to change?– Why does it need to change?– What skills do they need to effect change?– How will they supported? – What is the desired goal?– How will they know when the goal is reached?
58
And don’t leave any child behind~
• In the words of John Dewey:– “What the best and wisest parent wants for
his own child, that must the community want for all its children. Any other ideal for our schools is narrow and unlovely; acted upon, it destroys our democracy.” (1899)
17th Annual Model Schools Conference17th Annual Model Schools ConferenceJune 28- July 1, 2009June 28- July 1, 2009
Atlanta Atlanta
Visit www.LeaderEd.com for more informationVisit www.LeaderEd.com for more information
Mark Your Calendar!
60
• 1587 Route 146• Rexford, New York 12148• 518-399-2776• 518-399-7607 (fax)• www.leadered.com
Cheryl Dyer
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
P.O. Box 6030
836 Newmans Lane
Bridgewater, NJ 08807
www.brrsd.k12.nj.us
908-685-2777 ext. 277
Questions and Answers
• This is the end of the presentation portion.
• Submit questions at this time and stay on to hear the answers.
• If you are logging off, thank you for attending and we will email you with follow-up information.
For more information about the
www.LeaderEd.com
Thank you for attending!We hope you found the information valuable.
Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or comments. We encourage and value your feedback.
(518) 399-2776 | [email protected]
For future webinar dates and topics visit
www.LeaderEd.com
ReReFOCUSFOCUS
ReRePOSITION POSITION
ReReINVENTINVENT
Cheryl and our team of consultants are available to work with your school or district.
Data Driven Decision Making Response to Intervention (RTI) Curriculum Design and Implementation Literacy Across the Curriculum Differentiated Instruction Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships
www.LeaderEd.com
For information, please contact Lindsay Kaufman at (518) 723-2064 or [email protected].
www.leadered.com/consulting.html
Achieve Student Success with LessAchieve Student Success with LessK-12 FALL SYMPOSIUM
OCTOBER 23 – 25, 2009 SAN DIEGO
www.LeaderEd.com