Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
ByDatuk Ir. Hj. Keizrul bin Abdullah
PresidentInternational Commission on Irrigation and Drainage
ICID 15 September 2005
Use of Water and Land for Food Security and
Environmental Sustainability
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
IrrigationIrrigationW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Hanging Gardens of Babylon
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Ancient Irrigation Systems
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Water Wheel
2
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Women Power
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Manual irrigation
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Water hose
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
3
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
54.72183.51Asia
3.8811.72Africa
2.172.66Oceania
46.0623.46Europe
64.5640.75Americas
171.39262.10Total -101 countries
Drained AreaMha
Irrigated AreaMha
Continent
Ref: ICID 2004
Irrigated and Drained Areas
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Agriculture Domestic Industry
70 %
20 %
10 %
Water Withdrawal
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Ref: World Bank
Water Withdrawals
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Irrigation water use efficiency generally low : 20 % (paddy) to 90 % drip
• Average for developing countries ~43 %
• Irrigated Agriculture guzzler of water
• Calls from NGOs for improvement in water productivity water efficiency & higher crop yields
WaterWater
4
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Over-irrigation resulting in …….
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
….. water-logged agricultural areas
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
… leading to poor yields, salinization …..
…. and Desertification
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Excessive pumping of groundwater
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Fertilizer residue in return flow
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Similarly drainage projects has many impacts
Flood ControlWastewater disposal
Infrastructure and settlements
Environment
Groundwater -drinking
Fishing - Health
+ve, -ve / direct-indirect /On-site, Off-site/
Ref: Safwat Abdel-Dayem, WB
5
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Acid Sulphate Soils
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Peat Subsidence in Johor Barat,
Malaysia
1975
19871989
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Peat
Peat Fires
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Farm Road
Effect of Peat Fires
Paya IndahPeat Swamp, Malaysia
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
CO2 EMISSIONS FROM DRAINED PEAT
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Irrigation and drainage seen as polluters and cause of environmental degradation
• Led to decline in irrigation and drainage investments
• World Bank funding : US$ 700 - 800 m US$ 200 - 300 m
• Number of projects 20-25 5-6
• New projects Rehabilitation
InvestmentInvestment
6
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Ref: Salah Darghouth, WB
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2025
% increase
Irrigation ExpansionIrrigation Expansion
2.3 %2.3 %
1.3 %1.3 %
0.6 %0.6 %1.0 %1.0 %
Ref: Hopper
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Are
a (M
Ha)
Rate of Increase of Irrigated Area
World
Developing Countries
Developed CountriesChina
India
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Rising capital cost1. Rising capital cost
2. Low return on capital2. Low return on capital
3. Problem of operation 3. Problem of operation and maintenanceand maintenance
4. Low efficiency of 4. Low efficiency of water use.water use.
55. Low level of water . Low level of water charges and revenuescharges and revenues
6. Environmental impacts 6. Environmental impacts of projects (dams)of projects (dams)
7. Degradation of natural 7. Degradation of natural resourcesresources
Poor Prospects fornew Irrigation & Drainage Projects
Poor Prospects fornew Irrigation & Drainage Projects
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Irrigated Agriculture
Wither Wither goestgoest irrigation ??irrigation ??
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Is Irrigation a “Sunset” industry ??
7
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Dec 26, 2004
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
FAO : 850 million chronically hungry
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
8
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Disaster Starvation
Extreme events : famines, wars
850 million
8%
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
850 million
8%
92%
Chronic malnutrition
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
THE THE CHRONICALLY CHRONICALLY
HUNGRYHUNGRY
Smallholder farms: Smallholder farms: 50%50% The rural landless: The rural landless: 22%22%
The urban poor: The urban poor: 20%20%
Forests Forests dwellers,dwellers,
pastoralists, pastoralists, fishermen: fishermen: 8%8%
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• FAO 850 million people undernourished
• 815 million in developing countries and 27 million in countries in transition
• 5 million children die annually from hunger
• In economic terms, developing countries lose $ billions in lost productivity and earnings
Food ShortageFood Shortage
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Undernourished Population (2000-2002)
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
FOOD SECURITYFOOD SECURITY
9
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• FAO definition physical, social and economic access for all people to sufficient, safe and nutritious food for an active and healthy life
• At global level, ability to produce food > ability to get the food to those in need
• At regional/national level, there are discrepancies
Food SecurityFood Security
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Net World Cereal Export Surplus in Million ton (T), or in % of Own Production (OP)
Source : Schultz et al. (2003)
1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 T OP T OP T OP T OP T OP
Asia -81.9 -8.3 -79.3 -7.8 -81.1 -7.9 -74.1 -7.4 -77.4 -7.8
Africa -33.8 -30.8 -38.8 -33.9 -40.7 -36.5 -43.8 -39 -43.2 -36.7
Americas 83.7 16.1 77.7 14.6 82.4 15.7 82.1 15.4 83.4 16.1
Europe 15.1 3.4 22.8 5.8 18.7 4.9 12.5 3.2 19.2 4.5
Oceania 17.9 56.1 20.9 61.3 20.7 57.7 20.6 58 20.8 54.2
World 1 0 3.3 0.2 0 0 -2.7 -0.1 2.8 0.1
Developed Countries 99.6 11.4 111.8 13.3 117.3 14.3 105.2 12.7 109.2 12.9
Emerging developing countries
-61.5 -5.7 -65.5 -5.9 -74.5 -6.7 -62.5 -5.8 -61.1 -5.6
Least developed Countries
-37.1 -26.6 -43 -29.4 -42.8 -28.9 -45.4 -29.9 -45.3 -28.8
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• In 1996 FAO World Food Summit
• Objective to get global commitment to eliminate hunger and malnutrition, and to achieve sustainable food security for all people
• World Food Summit and MDG goal reduce by 50% by 2015
• Need to reduce by 22 million/yr c.f. current rate only 6 million/yr
Food SecurityFood Security
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
CHALLENGES AHEADCHALLENGES AHEAD
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Population Growth
Challenges AheadChallenges Ahead
10
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
High variant
Medium variant
Low variant
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Year
4
6
8
10
12
14
2
GLOBAL POPULATION 1960 - 2050
Bill
ions
Ref: UN
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 WORLD POPULATIONWORLD POPULATION
0
5
10
2000 2025 2050YearYear
Bill
ion
Bill
ion
6.0
6.0 7.
857.
85 8.92
8.92
Ref: UN
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• 50 % increase in population by 2050
PopulationPopulation
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
97-99 2015 2030 2050
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
0
2
4
6
8
10
YEAR
Billi
ons
WORLD DEV.COUNTRIES IND. COUNTRIES TRAN. COUNTRIES
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 ASIA ASIA -- Population Population vsvs Land AreaLand Area
World World -- Land AreaLand Area
World World -- PopulationPopulation
60%60%
40%40%
ASIAASIA
11
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1990455.2 million tons
2020781.3 million tons
-- Increase of 40%Increase of 40%
-- Require additional 9.8 million ha of landRequire additional 9.8 million ha of land
-- Assuming yields of 3.2 tons of rice per ha.Assuming yields of 3.2 tons of rice per ha.
International Rice Research Institute
Global Rice OutlookGlobal Rice Outlook
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• 50 % increase in population by 2050
PopulationPopulation
• Rural - urban migration
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
POPULATION IN AGRICULTURETotal population and population economically active in agriculture in year 2000
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Total population and population economically active in agriculture in year 2000
POPULATION IN AGRICULTURE
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• 50 % increase in population by 2050
PopulationPopulation
• Rural - urban migration
• Declining role of agriculture (GDP, labour) Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1960 1970 1980 1990 1995 2000
DECLINING CONTRIBUTION OF AGRICULTURE DECLINING CONTRIBUTION OF AGRICULTURE -- MALAYSIAMALAYSIA
% % LabourLabour force force / agric sector/ agric sector
% GDP / Agric % GDP / Agric sector sector
% C
ontr
ibut
ion
% C
ontr
ibut
ion
12
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• 50 % increase in population by 2050
PopulationPopulation
• Rural - urban migration
• Declining role of agriculture (GDP, labour)
• Changes in lifestyle
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• More disposal income Change in diet, more consumption of meat
• Developed countries 70-100 kg/p/yr c.f. < 20 kg/p/yr in developing countries
• Developing world catching upChina : 11 kg (1975) 50 kg (2000)
LifestyleLifestyleW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
1 kg beef: 44,000 litres
Water to produce various consumables...
1 doz. eggs: 8,400 litres
1 burger & fries: 7,900 litres
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 1kgPulses, roots, tubers
2kgPalm oil5kgRice2kgPaddy1kgWheat6kgFresh poultry
10kgFresh lamb15kgFresh beef
500headSheep and goats4,000headCattle
Equivalent water, m³
UnitFood Product
Water Requirement EquivalentWater Requirement Equivalent
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• More disposal income Change in diet, more consumption of meat
• Developed countries 70-100 kg/p/yr c.f. < 20 kg/p/yr in developing countries
• Developing world catching up
• Need to increase cereal production 1.84 b tons 2.8 b tons by 2030 [50 % food, 44 % feed]
LifestyleLifestyle
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Population Growth2. Limited Water Resources
Challenges AheadChallenges Ahead
13
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
High variant
Medium variant
Low variant
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Year
4
6
8
10
12
14
2
GLOBAL POPULATION 1960 - 2050
Bill
ions
Ref: UN
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
DOMESTICDOMESTIC
INDUSTRYINDUSTRY
AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE
NATURENATURE
WATERWATER
Growing Demand for WaterGrowing Demand for Water
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Freshwater availability per capita1950- 2050
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Water Crisis
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
14
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• To meet 2025 food production levels need ~ 2,000 cubic km of additional irrigation water (24× annual flow of Nile River)
• By 2025, ~2.7 billion people (1/3 world population) facing severe water shortage
WaterWater
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Water Scarcity in 2025Water Scarcity in 2025
Source :
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• To meet 2025 food production levels need ~ 2,000 cubic km of additional irrigation water (24× annual flow of Nile River)
• By 2025, ~2.7 billion people (1/3 world population) facing severe water shortage
• Chronic competition for water expected
WaterWater
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
DOMESTICDOMESTIC
INDUSTRYINDUSTRY
AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE
NATURENATURE
WATERWATER
Competition for WaterCompetition for Water
15
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Population Growth
2. Limited Water Resources
3. Limited Land Resources
Challenges AheadChallenges Ahead
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• 1.5 billion ha used for crop production
• Crop production areas growing @ 1.3 % per yr vs 2.2 % during past 30 years
• Arable land per capita decreasing from 0.3 ha (1989-91) to 0.2 ha (2000-2002)
Land UtilisationLand UtilisationW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
Arable land (ha/person)
Ref: World Bank
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• 1.5 billion ha used for crop production
• Crop production areas growing @ 1.3 % per yr vs 2.2 % during past 30 years
• Arable land per capita decreasing from 0.3 ha (1989-91) to 0.2 ha (2000-2002)
• Expansion of land base to marginal lands
Land UtilisationLand Utilisation
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Hills cleared for agriculture ……..
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
……. and rice cultivation
16
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Marginal soils utilised for Agriculture
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
MARGINAL SOILS AND LOW-LYING AREA
Require Intensive InfrastructureLow Productivity
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• 1.5 billion ha used for crop production
• Crop production areas growing @ 1.3 % per yr vs 2.2 % during past 30 years
• Arable land per capita decreasing from 0.3 ha (1989-91) to 0.2 ha (2000-2002)
• Expansion of land base to marginal lands
• Regional differences
Land UtilisationLand Utilisation
Sources: FAO data and Fischer et al. (2000)
Cropland in use and total suitable land (million ha)
Ref : FAO data and Fischer et al. (2000)
1066 1031
203 228
366
232
220
207
99
86
874
387
497
265
Limited Arable Land and Competition for other Usage
South Asia
East Asia
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
FEEDING THE WORLD
FEEDING THE WORLD
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Providing Irrigation and Drainage
Feeding The WorldFeeding The World
17
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 WORLD FOOD PRODUCTIONWORLD FOOD PRODUCTION
World World -- AreaArea
World World -- FoodFood
40%40%
17%17%
IRRIGATEDIRRIGATED
NONNON--IRRIGATEDIRRIGATED
Ref: Postel
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Irrigation and drainage infrastructure reduce risk from water-related hazards
InfrastructureInfrastructureW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
Dry Season - Water Scarcity
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Canals supply water
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wet Season - Water Logging
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Drains remove excess water
18
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Irrigation and drainage infrastructure reduce risk from water-related hazards
• Infrastructure necessary for assured water supply, multiple cropping / yr
InfrastructureInfrastructure
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Multiple cropping = Multiple production
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
More intensive cropping density
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Irrigation and drainage infrastructure reduce risk from water-related hazards
• Infrastructure necessary for assured water supply, multiple cropping / yr
• Better water management - improve yields
InfrastructureInfrastructure
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
PAD
DY
YIEL
DS
ton/
ha
Ext
ensi
ve fa
rmin
g
Inte
nsiv
e fa
rmin
g
Source : Kawasugi
POORLY DRAINED
WELL DRAINED
Padd
y Yi
elds
t/ha
Padd
y Yi
elds
t/ha
00
44
88
1212
19
Effect of Improved Drainage on Yields
U – UNDRAINEDS – SURFACE DRAINAGESS – SUBSUFACE DRAINAGEC - COMBINATION
Source : Agri Drainage Bulletin 871-98
Effect of Drainage Intensity on Yields
Source : Agri Drainage Bulletin 871-98
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Average yield (tons/ha) of rice, wheat, maize, 1960 and 1994
Average Yields
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Irrigation and drainage infrastructure reduce risk from water-related hazards
• Infrastructure necessary for assured water supply, multiple cropping / yr
• Better water management - improve yields
• Salinization affects 1-1.5 million ha / yr, need for drainage
InfrastructureInfrastructure
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
17 152623603080332121
7.0 6.74.24.22.41.71.00.9
28.147.7
India ChinaPakistanUSAUzbekistanIranTurkmenistanEgyptSubtotalWorld Estimate
Total irrigated Land Damaged by Salt (percent)
Irrigated Land Damaged by Salt (million Ha)
Country
Salinisation of Soils on Irrigated Lands
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
20
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Subsurface Drainage - Tile Drains
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Irrigation and drainage infrastructure reduce risk from water-related hazards
• Infrastructure necessary for assured water supply, multiple cropping / yr
• Better water management - improve yields
• Salinization affects 1-1.5 million ha / yr, need for drainage
• Gradual shift in thinking
InfrastructureInfrastructureW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
…. need for continued investment in infrastructure ……
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Some Good News !!!!Some Good News !!!!
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Ref: Salah Darghouth, WB
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Ref: Salah Darghouth, WB
21
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Providing Irrigation and Drainage2. Improving Water Use Efficiency
Meeting The ChallengesMeeting The Challenges
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
More Crop Per Drop
More Crop Less Drop
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
More Crop Per Drop
More Crop Less Drop
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Less Drop
Improving Water Efficiency
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
WSSD Plan of Action
• “To develop integrated water resource management and water efficiency plans by 2005”
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
WSSD Plan of Action
• “To develop integrated water resource management and water efficiency plansby 2005”
22
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
WSSD Plan of Action
• “To develop integrated water resource management and water efficiency plansby 2005”
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
SystemsSystems
Improving Water EfficiencyImproving Water Efficiency
REDUCEREDUCEWATER WATER
USEUSE
LESS LESS DROPDROP
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
2.5 % of existing infrastructure needs to be rehabilitated or replaced each year
(207 million ha)
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Recycling Irrigation Supply using Pumps
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 More efficient irrigation systems
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Sprinklers for rice in Brazil
Water use reduced to one quarter (¼) cf. flood irrigation
23
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
SystemsSystems
Improving O&MImproving O&M
Improving Water EfficiencyImproving Water Efficiency
LESS LESS DROPDROP
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Control Room
Better operation to reduce losses
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Comparing and assessing scheme’s performance
• Improve weaknesses
• Learn, borrow, adapt best management practices
Benchmarking Benchmarking
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
SystemsSystems
Improving O&MImproving O&M
Cost RecoveryCost Recovery
Improving Water EfficiencyImproving Water Efficiency
LESS LESS DROPDROP
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Wastage because of little or no water recovery cost from farmers
• Where available, quantum low and inadequate
• Need adequate and appropriate charges, with measurement system
Cost RecoveryCost Recovery
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Control and Measuring
Structures to reduce
operational losses
24
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
SystemsSystems
Improving O&MImproving O&M
Cost RecoveryCost Recovery
ModernisationModernisation
Improving Water EfficiencyImproving Water Efficiency
LESS LESS DROPDROP
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
“Irrigation Modernisation is a process of
technical and managerialupgrading of irrigation scheme
combined with institutional reforms
with the objective to improve resource utilisation
(labour, water, economic, environmental)
and water productivity”
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Wider stakeholders’ participation
• Water user groups, Farmers Associations
• Turnover programs
• Dialogues
• Capacity building
Institutional Reforms Institutional Reforms
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Providing Irrigation and Drainage
2. Improving Water Use Efficiency3. Rain-fed Areas
Meeting The ChallengesMeeting The Challenges
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 WORLD FOOD PRODUCTIONWORLD FOOD PRODUCTION
World World -- AreaArea
World World -- FoodFood
40%40%
17%17%
IRRIGATEDIRRIGATED
NONNON--IRRIGATEDIRRIGATED
Ref: Postel
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 WORLD FOOD PRODUCTIONWORLD FOOD PRODUCTION
World World -- AreaArea World World -- FoodFood
60%60%83%83%
RAINRAIN--FEDFEDNONNON--IRRIGATEDIRRIGATED
Ref: Postel
25
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Represents 87 % of cropped land
• Small improvement large impact
• Subjected to risk of water related hazards
• Providing basic infrastructure
• Small scale projects
Rain-fed Areas Rain-fed Areas
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Providing Irrigation and Drainage
2. Improving Water Use Efficiency
3. Rain-fed Areas
4. Technology
Meeting The ChallengesMeeting The ChallengesW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
• R&D
Technology Technology
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Water use efficiency
• Waste water treatment
• Improved Hydraulic structures
• Decision support systems
• Unconventional water (eg. desalinization)
• Renewable energy
R & DR & D
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• R&D
• Improvements to systems and processes
Technology Technology
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Telemetric water level station
26
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Automatic gate
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Agro-climatic station
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• R&D
• Improvements to systems and processes
• Field application / best practices
Technology Technology
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Direct Seeding
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
New High Yielding Variety
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• R&D
• Improvements to systems and processes
• Field application / best practices
• Better management models
Technology Technology
27
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
GROUND DATA COLLECTIONGROUND DATA COLLECTION
Pest, weed etcPest, weed etc
BASIC LAYERSBASIC LAYERS
MODELLING for optimum input and MODELLING for optimum input and outputoutput
ACTION MAP for optimum inputACTION MAP for optimum input
Soil MapSoil MapYield MapYield MapLand Use MapLand Use MapCadastralCadastral MapMap
Remote Sensing DataRemote Sensing DataWeather DataWeather DataSocioSocio--EconomicEconomic
Objective:Objective:
Development and integration of remote Development and integration of remote sensing, GIS, GPS and related technologies for sensing, GIS, GPS and related technologies for efficient and precision plantation management efficient and precision plantation management to increase national rice and oil palm to increase national rice and oil palm production and quality of environmentproduction and quality of environment
Use of Technology - Precision Farming
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Control Room
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• R&D
• Improvements to systems and processes
• Field application / best practices
• Better management models
• Capacity building, humanware, TOT
Technology Technology
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Training of Farmers
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Providing Irrigation and Drainage
2. Improving Water Use Efficiency
3. Rain-fed Areas
4. Technology5. Integrated Approach
Meeting The ChallengesMeeting The Challenges
28
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
3rd World Water Forum, Kyoto
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
LOOK BEYOND THE CANAL (& DRAIN)
LOOK BEYOND THE CANAL (& DRAIN)
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Role of Irrigated Agriculture goes beyond commodity production
Looking Beyond The CanalLooking Beyond The Canal
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Irrigation scheme Product
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Irrigation scheme Product
Product Food, Income
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Irrigation scheme Product
Product Food, Income
Food, Income
Quality of life, Contribution
to GDP
29
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Role of Irrigated Agriculture• Externalities
Looking Beyond The CanalLooking Beyond The Canal
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Irrigated agriculture will always generate externalities
• Eliminate or compensate by internalisingthe externalities
ExternalitiesExternalitiesW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
• Role of Agriculture in economy
• Externalities
• Multiple roles Multi-functional roles of irrigated agriculture, including providing environmental services
Looking Beyond The CanalLooking Beyond The Canal
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Creation of rural employment
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Green lung - aesthetic
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Aesthetic - Landscape
30
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Groundwater recharge
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Groundwater recharge
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
80-90 percent of NO3-N is removed when contaminated water passes
through paddy field
Water Purification
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Flood control
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Soil erosion control
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
200 27.6 oC
180 27.4
160 27.2
140 27.0
120 26.8
100 26.6
80 26.4
60 26.2
0 15 30 45 60 (m)
Wind
Asphalt Paddy Potato Soybean Asphalt
Fig.1: Two-dimensional air temperature profiles above paddy fields
(Oue, 1994)
HeightAbove ground (cm)
Redistribution of Solar Energy above Paddy Fields
Air cooling effect
31
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 Environment friendly - Migratory birds
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Role of Agriculture in economy
• Externalities
• Multiple roles
• An integrated approach
Looking Beyond The CanalLooking Beyond The CanalW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
• Holistic view
Integrated Approach Integrated Approach
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Society
•Population•Life style•Culture•Rural-urban migration
Environment
•Water•Hydrosphere•Land•Biosphere•Minerals
Food Security
•Food production•Affordibility•Distribution•Agriculture•Industry•Services
Impacts
Impacts Impacts
Food Security and Society
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Holistic view
• Hardware & software
Integrated Approach Integrated Approach
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
HardwareInfrastructureTechnology
Integrated Approach
SoftwareInstitutions, laws
Governance
32
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Holistic view
• Hardware & software
• Integration within scheme
Integrated Approach Integrated Approach
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Irrigation & Drainage Water StructuresW
ater
and
Lan
d
Sept 2005
• Holistic view
• Hardware & software
• Integration within scheme
• Integration within river basin
Integrated Approach Integrated Approach
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Irrigation & Drainage System Irrigation & Drainage System -- EgyptEgypt
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Holistic view
• Hardware & software
• Integration within scheme
• Integration within river basin
• Irrigation and Drainage as a component of IWRM
Integrated Approach Integrated Approach
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Hea
lth
Wat
er Q
ualit
y
Wat
er S
uppl
y
Floo
ds/D
roug
hts
Ener
gy
Agric
ultu
re
Indu
stry
Pollu
tion
Prev
Coa
stal
Mgt
.
Ecos
yste
m M
gt.
Activity Sectors (water uses)
Social
Development
Economic
Development
Env.
ProtectionObjectives
Governance
Management Institutions
Fe
The IWRM Process
Feed
back
Ref: GWP
33
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
IWRM PERSPECTIVE
Structure
EconomicEfficiency Equity Environmental
Sustainability
ManagementInstruments
EnablingEnvironment
InstitutionalFrameworks
Balance ‘Water for Food’ and ‘Water for Nature’
Principles
Ref: GWP
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005 ICID’s Country Policy Support Program (CPSP)
A Schematic model
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Introduction to THE
DRAINFRAMEAPPROACH
Ref: Safwat Abdel-Dayem, WB
2. Describe changes in air, water, soil, flora, fauna
3. Describe secondary and higher-order changes
4. Determine geographical and time range of changes
5. Identify affected landscape(s)
6. Identify affected functions and their stakeholders; assess impacts on economic, social and ecological values
7. Acceptabilityof impacts?
Implementation
9. Mitigation measures
1. Describe the Drainage Intervention
No Yes
iteration IMPACT ASSESSMENT& DECISIONMAKING
Discussion and negotiation of tradeoffs
8. Define alternative solutions
Ref: Safwat Abdel-Dayem, WB
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
1. Providing Irrigation and Drainage
2. Improving Water Use Efficiency
3. Rain-fed Areas
4. Technology
5. Integrated Approach
6. ICID Strategies for Food Security
Meeting The ChallengesMeeting The Challenges
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
ICID Strategies For Global Food Security
* Categories of countries arranged from Deficiency to Surplus food self-sufficiency.
Category I : Many countries in Sub-Saharan AfricaCategory II : Saudi Arabia, Japan etc.Category III : India, China etc.Category IV : USA, Canada etc.
Category
ofcountries*
Food SelfSufficiency
EconomicStatus(GNP)
Population Status ofWRD Governance Strategies
I Deficient Low High Low DeficientAid, Investment, Develop WaterResources, Improve Efficiency,Population Control
II Deficient High Low Adequate Adequate Virtual Water - Import
III SufficientLow and
Low
MiddleHigh Medium Evolving
Investment, Develop WaterResource, Improve Efficiency,Population Control
IV Surplus High Low Adequate Adequate Trade - Export
34
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Food Security - Pressing problems to be solved
ConclusionConclusion
• Population growth• Food production needs• Water issues• Environmental issues
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Food Security - Pressing problems to be solved
• Irrigation and Drainage Significant factor in meeting challenges
ConclusionConclusion
• Enabling role to achieve required production increase
• Small scale infrastructure Significant improvement to rain-fed areas
• Need to be more environment friendly
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Food Security - Pressing problems to be solved
• Irrigation and Drainage Significant factor in meeting challenges
• Need to improve on water use efficiency
ConclusionConclusion
• More Crop Less Drop
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
• Food Security - Pressing problems to be solved
• Irrigation and Drainage Significant factor in meeting challenges
• Need to improve on water use efficiency
• Holistic approach Look beyond the canal / drain
ConclusionConclusion
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Use of Water and Land for Food Security and
Environmental Sustainability
35
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005
Dujiangyan Irrigation System
Celebrated 2260th anniversary in 2004
Truly irrigation and drainage can be sustainable !!
Wat
er a
nd L
and
Sept 2005