21
National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park Exploring and Expanding Park Usage Through Pokémon Go Bringing new audiences to County Parks and extending visits

Usage Through Pokémon - Montgomery Planningmontgomeryplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/...National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park Background

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Exploring and Expanding Park

Usage Through Pokémon Go Bringing new audiences to County Parks and extending visits

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Outline

• Background and Problem Area

• Key Questions

• Analysis Approaches

• Mapping Park Features

• Results Highlights

• Recommendations for MNCPPC

• Park Feature Highlights

2

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Background and Problem Area

● Parks and open spaces are essential to Montgomery County

residents

● Existence of a park does not guarantee high utilization

● Project Objectives:■ Attract and retain visitors of all ages to the park ■ Develop a data inventory for a pokemon go style application ■ A collaborative effort between urban planning and information sciences

3

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Key Questions

● Given that park space and facilities already exist, what would it

take to encourage people to use this space?

● How can visitors be engaged to stay longer in parks?

● Are parks prepared to receive all populations, young and old?

4

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Collection & Analysis

• Data collection • Latitude/longitude coordinates for 3-5 physical features per 19 parks

• Feature types, specific characteristics

• Spatial analysis • Location distribution of park features in relation to park entrances• Feature Type Distribution of parks • Investigation of population density surrounding parks to produce

thematic maps• Hot Spot Analysis to determine the distance weighted density of all

features

5

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Mapping Selected Parks

• M-NCPPC provided 19 parks for the study

• Parks are well spread across the county, and included various types:• Regional Parks• Conservation Parks• Special Parks• Urban Parks• Local Parks

6

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Population Density

7

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Mapping Park Features

Wheaton Regional Park has something for all ages

8

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Hot Spot Analysis

• Spread of various features in parks

• Concentration of all features are well represented in county

9

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Park Features Distribution

• Performed spatial join of park features collected in the field with park entrance data provided by M-NCPPC

• Plot shows that features are well distributed across the parks

10

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Park Feature Type Distribution

Social

• checkerboard tables, picnic

areas, dog parks and fishing

piers.

Contemplative

• art sculptures, gardens, and

historic buildings/sites

Active

• sports fields, bike racks and

playgrounds

11

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Results

●19 parks and 92 features

○ 12 small parks with 58 features, and 7 large parks with 34 features

○ Large recreational parks typically offer more features than small urban parks

●Some park features are under marketed, our teams were engaged to return

after discovering park features for first time

●Duration of stay increases as number and distance between features increases

●Sitting areas for adult/senior population are generally insufficient

12

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Recommendations for M-NCPPC

• Additional seating needed at most park features

• Increased promotion of parks and features

• Connecting historical features across the park system

• Age cohorts usership

• Further feature collections of M-NCPPC park inventory/continual evaluation

13

The Jumping Pillow at Little Bennett Regional Park

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Park Feature Highlights

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Agricultural History Farm Park

15

Lauren S and Lauren P

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Wheaton Regional Park

16

Maria, Rahul, and Elena

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

South Germantown Recreational Park

17

Maria, Rahul, and Elena

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Woodlawn Manor Cultural Park

18

Christine and Sacsheen

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Black Hill Regional Park

19

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

In Conclusion

• Field investigation: unique features of 19 parks, 92 features

• Data compilation and questions for features

• Resulting products: data spreadsheet, report, park pictures

• Overall visited new parks and learned about area’s history

• Background for future Pokemon Go Park App - Spring 2018

20

National Center for Smart Growth | The University of Maryland, College Park

Questions?