Upload
cole-lynch
View
26
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
U.S. vs. Addyston Pipe and Steel Company, et al. Price fixing and Market Allocation 1896-98. The Addyston Group: Cast Iron Pipe. Industry Characteristics and Background. High fixed costs, fluctuating demand, high transportation costs, product homogeneity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
PRICE FIXING AND MARKET ALLOCATION1896-98
U.S. vs. Addyston Pipe and Steel Company, et al
The Addyston Group: Cast Iron Pipe
Company Location Capacity (tons/year)
Addyston Pipe and Steel
Cincinnati, OH 45,000
Dennis Long and Co. Louisville, KY 45,000
Howard-Harrison Iron Co.
Bessemer, AL 45,000
Anniston Pipe and Foundry
Anniston, AL 30,000
South Pittsburgh Pipe Works
South Pittsburgh, TN 15,000
Chattanooga Foundry Chattanooga, TN 40,000
TOTAL 220,000
Industry Characteristics and Background
High fixed costs, fluctuating demand, high transportation costs, product homogeneity
Customers are municipalities and utilities for distribution of water and natural gas. Jobs are bid.
Geographical location of Addyston group gave it transportation cost advantages over manufacturers in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York.
Recession severely reduced demand for pipe in early 1890s
Firms sought ways to restrict “ruinous” competitionAddyston group operated at only 45% capacity in
1896 after recovery had begun
First Agreement 1894
Reserve territory: cities reserved to certain firms Firms chose cities closer to them than to other firms Firms paid a “bonus” of $2/ton to cartel for sales to
reserve citiesPay territory: all other cities west of NewYork
and Pennsylvania and south of Virginia All member firms bid for business in these cities Pay “bonus” of $1 to $4 per ton to cartel Bonus determined by cartel’s transportation cost
advantage over outsidersBonuses paid out to members based on their
production capacities
Second Agreement 1895
First agreement failed to “advance the price” in pay area
All requests for bids sent to cartel Board.Cartel Board determines price to be bid for the
job, reflecting transportation cost advantages.Each cartel member “bids” a bonus amount to be
paid to the cartel for winning the job (say, $8/ton)Cartel Board announces winning member on
each job, who bids cartel price to end customer.Other members also bid on each job to suggest
competition, but bid higher than the cartel price.Bonuses were shared among the cartel members
according to their production capacities.See transportation cost graph.
Court Proceedings
Philadelphia pipe company underbids cartel for Atlanta job; Atlanta rejects all bids as too high.
Secretary of cartel offers to make cartel operations public in return for share of damages.
Government sues cartel (1896); loses in district court.On appeal, 6th Circuit finds for the government
(1898). Judge William Howard Taft writes opinion
“naked” restraints eliminate competition: per se illegal “ancillary” restraints may be socially beneficial: rule of reason Perpetually enjoined defendants from maintaining the combination
in cast iron pipe. Established per se illegality of price fixing restrictions later
confirmed in Trenton Potteries (Supreme Court, 1927).
Aftermath
In May 1898, after Taft’s decision in February, four cartel members merge to form the American Pipe and Foundry Company.
In 1899, American Pipe combines with the other two cartel members and other firms to become United States Cast Iron Pipe and Foundry Company.
U.S. Pipe has 450,000 tons annual capacity representing 75% of the national market.
This “merger to monopoly” would be illegal today, but was not at the time.
Sources
Viscusi, W. Kip, John M. Vernon and Joseph E. Harrington, Jr. (1998) Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, 2nd ed., Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 139-44.
Breit, William E. and Kenneth G. Elzinga. (1989) The Antitrust Casebook, 2nd ed., New York: Dryden Press, pp. 17-23.
Neale, A. D. (1970) The Antitrust Laws of the U. S. A. 2nd ed., London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-34.