Upload
rachel-treichler
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Us Powerplant Water Withdrawals
1/1
of the country, where surface water is generally more
plentiful (Figure 3).
Power plants in the West, in contrast, relied heavily
on recirculating systems, as those withdraw much lesswater. Dry-cooled power plants were also more com-
mon in the West, although they accounted for only
4 percent of the regions electricity production.
Average freshwater withdrawal intensities for each
state reected these regional dierences. Intensities were
lowest in western states, while areas of high intensity
were scattered around the East, including in the Great
Lakes states, Missouri, Tennessee, Virginia, and the
Carolinas (Figure 4).
and some types of concentrating solar power plantsall
of which use steam to drive turbineshave water intensi-
ties in the range of nuclear or coal. Some renewable
energy power plants with turbines employ dry cooling,and those require minimal amounts of water.
CoolntechnoloesacossheConyTo some degree, power plant cooling systems match lo-
cal water resources. We found that 86 percent of plants
drawing water from the sea in 2008 used once-through
cooling, taking advantage of their access to an essen-
tially limitless resource. Most inland power plants with
once-through systems were located in the eastern half
FigurE 3. Power Pant Water Withdrawas:East versus West
Water withdrawas in 2008 were much higher east than west
of the ississippi. hat is because pants with once-through
cooingwhich withdraw huge voumes of waterpro-
duced a much arger share of eectricity in the eastern haf of
the country, and because overa eectricity production was
aso higher east of the ississippi. Pants with once-through
cooing were ocated chiey aong the coasts, on the shores
of the reat lakes, and on arge rivers and reservoirs.
Note: Based on median NRL values for the use of both freshwater and seawater.
Cooling ponds may operate as once-through systems, recirculating systems, or a
combination of the two.
0.5
0
1.0
1.5
2.0
Generation (billions of MWh)
East of theMississippi
West of theMississippi
Share of Total Generation
54%30%
13%
2%
Cooling Technologies
Once-through
Cooling pond
Recirculating
Dry-cooled
Withdrawal(millions of gallons/year)