Upload
evelyn-phillips
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
U.S. Load Port: Cargo Handling
Discussion of a proposed communication protocol
Anthony FisherUSAID
Office of Acquisition and AssistanceTransportation Division
ObjectiveObjective
• To gather industry input on the creation of a communications protocol for use by parties involved in loading operations
Intent
• To transport only commodities of sound quality and condition
• To avoid unnecessary delays to the cargo and vessel
• To prevent over/under reaction
Effective Communication
• Contact the correct parties
• Accurately define the problem
• Clearly articulate the size and scope of the problem
• Provide updates on corrective measures
Challenges
• Disconnect between information available on-site and that which is accessible by stakeholders
• Confusion over responsibilities
• Uncertainty over proper notify parties
Lines of CommunicationLines of Communication
CarrierPVO/PIO
FGIS Inspector
Commodity Supplier
Stevedores
FAS
FSA
VLO Contractor
WarehouseExaminer
Rail/Truck Carrier
Terminal
Freight Forwarder
Receiver / Buyer
Vessel
Carrier’s Broker/Agent
Vessel Load Port
Agent
Vessel Discharge Port
Agent
Shipper’sOutport
Agent
So where is the confusion?
Questions
• Which parties should be included in the protocol?• Should a protocol be required or only a suggested best
practice?• Would a required communications protocol be too restrictive or
unenforceable?• Should the protocol establish communication channels for the
duration of the event or merely an emergency call list?• What information will be required by decision makers?• How to ensure that the size and scope of the problem are
properly conveyed and understood?
Anthony Fisher202-567-4645