Upload
others
View
11
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
URANS computations of an unstable
cavitating vortex rope.
Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference 2016.08-10 June 2016, Lausanne, Switzerland
Dr. Jean Decaix* and Pr. Cecile Munch, Univ. of Applied Sciences and Arts - WesternSwitzerland Valais, Sion, Switzerland.Dr. Andres Muller and Pr. Francois Avellan, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne,Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 1
CONTEXTFP7 ENERGY no: 608532 HYPERBOLE
HYdropower plants PERformance and flexiBle Operation towards Lean integration of new renewable Energies
https://hyperbole.epfl.ch
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 2
NEW CHALLENGES
The energy production and market are strongly
variable
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 3
NEW CHALLENGES
The energy production and market are strongly
variable
The electrical network requires stabilityJ. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 3
SOLUTION
To use hydropower plants for stabilizing the grid
⊲ Fast response.
⊲ Renewable energy.
⊲ Reversible energy using pump-storage power plants.
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 4
SOLUTION
To use hydropower plants for stabilizing the grid
⊲ Fast response.
⊲ Renewable energy.
⊲ Reversible energy using pump-storage power plants.
Challenge: how to make the power plant moreflexible
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 4
FLEXIBILITY
⇒ RUNNING AT OFF DESIGN OPERATING POINT
Vortex rope
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 5
CAVITATING VORTEX ROPE
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 6
CAVITATING VORTEX ROPE
RUNNER
DRAFT TUBE
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 7
TEST CASE
Q > Q BEP
Inlet
Outlet
Vortex rope
Parameter H (m) T (N m) E (J kg−1) N (rpm) Q (m3s−1)Value 26.8 1’400 263 800 0.515
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 8
FLOW MODELLING
Homogeneous URANS Equations
∂ρ
∂t+∇ ·
(
ρ ~C)
= 0
∂ρ ~C
∂t+∇ ·
(
ρ ~C ⊗ ~C)
= −∇p +∇ · (¯τ + ¯τt)
Viscous and turbulent stresses 1
¯τ = µ(
∇ ~C +∇t ~C)
¯τt = µt
(
∇ ~C +∇t ~C)
−2
3ρ k tr
(
¯I)
µt =ρa1k
max (a1ω; SF2)
1F.R. Menter. Zonal two equation k − ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In AIAA 93-2906, 24th Fluid Dynamics
Conference Orlando, Florida, 1993.
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 9
CAVITATION MODELLINGTransport equation for the vapour volume fraction rg
∂rg
∂t+
(
~C · ∇)
rg =1
ρg(Sv + Sc)
Source terms
Sv = Fv3rnuc (1− rg ) ρg
Rnuc
√
2
3
|pv − p|
ρfsgn (pv − p) if p < pv
Sc = Fc3rgρgRnuc
√
2
3
|pv − p|
ρfsgn (pv − p) if p > pv
Parameters
Fv = 50 Fc = 0.01 rnuc = 510−4Rnuc = 10−6
m
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 10
MESH
Sub-Domain Number of nodes(in million)
Spiral Case 1.69
Stay Vanesand 3.17
Guide Vanes
Runner 2.63
Draft Tube 3.10
Total 10.59
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 11
NUMERICAL SET UP
ANSYS CFX set up
⋄ Time step: ∆ t = 2e−4 s ⇔ 1 degree of runner revolution per time step.
⋄ Second order scheme for time discretization.
⋄ Transient rotor/stator interface with GGI interpolation.
⋄ High order scheme for spatial discretization.
Boundary conditions
⋄ Inlet: flow discharge.
⋄ Outlet: opening pressure condition.
⋄ Solid wall: no slip wall with wall law.
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 12
SIMULATIONS
σ = 0.38 σ = 0.20 σ = 0.11
Section 1
Operating point Head [m] Torque [N m]
σ = 0.38 26.10 (26.75) 1441 (1409)σ = 0.20 26.33 (26.80) 1443 (1428)σ = 0.11 24.37 (26.75) 1322 (1426)
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 13
σ = 0.38
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 14
σ = 0.2
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 15
σ = 0.11
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 16
PRESSURE COEFFICIENT
SECTION 1
CFD results Experimental results
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 17
CONCLUSION
⊲ The use of hydraulic power plants to stabilize the electrical networkrequires to extend the range of operating points of the turbines.
⊲ Such an extension requires to better understand the behavior of thecavitating vortex rope.
⊲ Two-phase URANS simulations are useful and accurate tools toinvestigate cavitating flow in hydraulic turbines.
⊲ CFD results allow to improve our knowledge of the transition betweenstable and unstable vortex rope.
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 18
RUNNER CAVITATION
σ = 0.38 σ = 0.20 σ = 0.11
J. Decaix PASC16, Lausanne, 08-10 June 2016 19