14
Upper Great Miami River Chenoa Courtney, Kristin Gunn, and Megan Lonsdale

Upper Great Miami River

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Upper Great Miami River. Chenoa Courtney, Kristin Gunn, and Megan Lonsdale. The Upper Great Miami River is located throughout several counties. Including: Auglaize, Hardin, Mercer, Champaign, and Logan There are 245 total stream miles 117.4 miles of the stream were assessed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Upper Great Miami River

Upper Great Miami River

Chenoa Courtney, Kristin Gunn, and Megan Lonsdale

Page 2: Upper Great Miami River

•The Upper Great Miami River is located throughout several counties. Including: Auglaize, Hardin, Mercer, Champaign, and Logan

•There are 245 total stream miles

•117.4 miles of the stream were assessed

Page 3: Upper Great Miami River
Page 4: Upper Great Miami River

Kristin’s Hypothesis

Hypothesis: As the Total Suspended Solids increase the QHEI (quality of habitat) and the ICI (diversity of macro-invertebrates) decrease.

Page 5: Upper Great Miami River

Data Analysis

As TSS decreases, ICI and QHEI increases.

Effects of Total suspended solids (TSS) on Habitat quality and macroinvertebrates

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Place & Time

TS

S

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Avg

. QH

EI &

ICI

Residue total non-filterable

Av_QHEI

ICI

Page 6: Upper Great Miami River

Conclusion:

• The Total Suspended Solids cover up the macroinvertebrate’s habitat.

• Since the quality of their habitat decreases, the macroinvertebrate’s population also decreases.

• My hypothesis was supported

Page 7: Upper Great Miami River

Chenoa’s Hypothesis

When the substrate quality decreases, the QHEI also

decreases

Page 8: Upper Great Miami River

QHEI vs. Agriculture vs. Forest

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Place and Time

QH

EI

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Ag.

and

For

est p

ecen

tage

s

Av_QHEI

Ag

Forest

Data Analysis: As Ag. and Forest increases, QHEI decreases.

Page 9: Upper Great Miami River

Conclusion

• Agriculture within 90 meters of the river can lower the QHEI.

• When farmers work the land at the edge of the stream, pesticide run-off kills sensitive fish, which lowers the QHEI, which in turn lowers the IBI.

• My hypothesis was supported.

Page 10: Upper Great Miami River

Megan’s Hypothesis

As DO (dissolved oxygen) increases,

so will the IBI (diversity of fish).

Page 11: Upper Great Miami River

Average DO versus Average IBI

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Time and Place

Avera

ge I

BI

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Avera

ge D

O

IBIDO

My graph shows that as the DO increases the IBI also increases.

Page 12: Upper Great Miami River

Conclusion• The Upper Great Miami

has very good DO with a healthy fish community

• Fish cannot live without oxygen, so therefore the IBI depends on the DO

• The DO is important because fish that are sensitive will not live in the creek/stream if there was low DO

• My hypothesis was supported

Page 13: Upper Great Miami River

To Increase ICI, IBI, and QHEI

• Don’t remove the cover (removing the cover would cause the DO level to drop) , rocky substrate, or meander (curves in the stream) from the stream

• Don’t farm within 90 meters of a creek/river

Page 14: Upper Great Miami River

Steve

Virginie

Paula

Kathry

n

Leslie

Shannon