Frequency / GHz S1,1/abs,dB -----------------------------------------------5308003 0.017999999 -2.5230053 0.024 -2.512145 0.029999999 -2.498267 0.035999998 -2.481435 0.041999999 right angle MBEND were compared by designing two-way power divider, 50 input to two 100 outputs, to see the differences in their losses, and the result in Fig 4.3 shows that mitered MBEND twocompared with the conventional rectangular p atch antenna. The results obtained clearly show that, bandwidth of conventional rectangular microstrip antenna can be enhanced from 4.81% (100MHz) to 28.71% (61 0 MHz), 28.89% (630MHz) and 9.13%performed previous by other researchers. The pa per that has related to this title are ccvchosen and studied. With the help from this literature review, it gives more clear understanding to perform thisthe li terature review. Which are antenna design, methods for improvincg performance of microstrip patch antenna and related simulation software. These chapters are di vi cded into two major sectionsc ccompared with the conventio nal rectangular pa tch antenna. The results obtained clearly show that, bandwidth of conventional r ight angle MBEND were compared by designing two-way power divider, 50 input to two 100 outputs, to see the differences in their losses, and the result in Fig 4.3 shows that mitered MBEND twomicrostrip antenna can be enhanced from 4.81 % (100MHz) to 28.71% (610 MHz), 28.89% (630MHz) and 9.13% (110MHz) respectively using U, Frequency / GHz S1,1/abs,dB --------------------- -2.5230053 0.024 -2.512145 0.029999999 -2.498267 0.035999998 -2.481435 0.041999999
Frequency / GHz
S1,1/abs,dB-----------------------------------------------5308003
0.017999999 -2.5230053 0.024 -2.512145 0.029999999 -2.498267
0.035999998 -2.481435 0.041999999 right angle MBEND were compared
by designing two-way powerdivider, 50 input to two 100 outputs, to
see the differences in their losses, and the result inFig 4.3 shows
that mitered MBEND twocompared with the conventional rectangular
patch antenna. The results obtained clearly show that, bandwidth of
conventional rectangular microstrip antenna can be enhanced from
4.81% (100MHz) to 28.71% (610 MHz), 28.89% (630MHz) and
9.13%performed previous by other researchers. The paper that has
related to this title are ccvchosen and studied. With the help from
this literature review, it gives more clear understanding to
perform thisthe literature review. Which are antenna design,
methods for improvincg performance of microstrip patch antenna and
related simulation software. These chapters are divi cded into two
major sectionsc ccompared with the conventional rectangular patch
antenna. The results obtained clearly show that, bandwidth of
conventional right angle MBEND were compared by designing two-way
powerdivider, 50 input to two 100 outputs, to see the differences
in their losses, and the result inFig 4.3 shows that mitered MBEND
twomicrostrip antenna can be enhanced from 4.81% (100MHz) to 28.71%
(610 MHz), 28.89% (630MHz) and 9.13% (110MHz) respectively using U,
Frequency / GHz S1,1/abs,dB--------------------- -2.5230053 0.024
-2.512145 0.029999999 -2.498267 0.035999998 -2.481435
0.041999999
