15
m.apollonio am041207 1 M. Apollonio University of Oxford update on STEP III

update on STEP III

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

update on STEP III. M. Apollonio University of Oxford. the case for STAGE III. first demonstration of cooling with solid absorber(s) ?. Chosen configuration must comply with coil/physics constraints : 1- max current 2- temp. margin 3- b (min)  minimise m.s. Matching Coils currents. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

m.apollonio am041207 1

M. Apollonio University of Oxford

update on STEP III

m.apollonio am041207 2

the case for STAGE III

first demonstration of cooling with solid absorber(s) ?

m.apollonio am041207 3

Matching Coils currents

Set up a procedure to find the right MC currents for a matched beam:a) (trk1-2)=1/, =0b) fix (min)

Z (m)

Chosen configuration must comply with coil/physics constraints:1- max current2- temp. margin3- (min) minimise m.s.

B (

T)

(m

)

m.apollonio am041207 4

800 mm

m.apollonio am041207 5

800 mm

T=97.9 % T=98.4 %

emi=10 mm rad(a) (b)

(a)

(b)

m.apollonio am041207 6

NB: beta_min = 49 cm (was 60cm at CM14)

means M1 1.4x, M2 0.7xmain issuesa)current increase: is it within

tolereances?b)magnet forces?c)MC distance = 800 mm. Can it be

changed?

300 A!

m.apollonio am041207 7

emittance growth in vacuum

Z (m)

T (f

inal

)/ T

(in

itia

l)

i=1.0 cm rad

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

T/T=2.8%

2.8 %T/

T Z (m)

T (cm rad)

m.apollonio am041207 8

xqByPxPxqB

PqBx

xPxPP

qBxP

P

qBxP

P

PxPP

P

xPcm

xxxy

xy

xyz

zx

z

zy

z

xxx

z

xNN

2

2222

: emittance evolution in a cylindrical symmetric channel

non uniform Bz can cause growth (e.g. flip region)

Z (m)

T (

m r

ad)

ecalc9

MUC-NOTE 0071 prediction

Most of the effect explainedMost of the effect explained

m.apollonio am041207 9

(a) 13 cm LiH absorber in the middle

m.apollonio am041207 10

-7.3%

-3%

-3%

Pz vs Zemi vs Z

Beta= 70cm

Beta= 50 cm

m.apollonio am041207 11

(b) 13 cm LiH absorber in the II solenoid

m.apollonio am041207 12

vacuum (no absorbers)

LiH absorberLiH absorber - vacuum

m.apollonio am041207 13

00

1

eq

p

p

00

1

eq

p

p

equilibrium

vacuum growth subtracted

emi. % variation

m.apollonio am041207 14

m.apollonio am041207 15

Conclusion

1)Slow B flip emi growth. Has to be minimized

2)a single absorber seems to work better

3) the middle point cannot have a low beta cooling effect reduced

4) reduce beta_centre increase M1 currents forces

5) better to place abs inside the II solenoid

uneasy6) transmission: large radius spool

piece doesn’t seem to create dramatic effects