Upload
brennan-jensen
View
19
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
update on STEP III. M. Apollonio University of Oxford. the case for STAGE III. first demonstration of cooling with solid absorber(s) ?. Chosen configuration must comply with coil/physics constraints : 1- max current 2- temp. margin 3- b (min) minimise m.s. Matching Coils currents. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
m.apollonio am041207 2
the case for STAGE III
first demonstration of cooling with solid absorber(s) ?
m.apollonio am041207 3
Matching Coils currents
Set up a procedure to find the right MC currents for a matched beam:a) (trk1-2)=1/, =0b) fix (min)
Z (m)
Chosen configuration must comply with coil/physics constraints:1- max current2- temp. margin3- (min) minimise m.s.
B (
T)
(m
)
m.apollonio am041207 6
NB: beta_min = 49 cm (was 60cm at CM14)
means M1 1.4x, M2 0.7xmain issuesa)current increase: is it within
tolereances?b)magnet forces?c)MC distance = 800 mm. Can it be
changed?
300 A!
m.apollonio am041207 7
emittance growth in vacuum
Z (m)
T (f
inal
)/ T
(in
itia
l)
i=1.0 cm rad
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
T/T=2.8%
2.8 %T/
T Z (m)
T (cm rad)
m.apollonio am041207 8
xqByPxPxqB
PqBx
xPxPP
qBxP
P
qBxP
P
PxPP
P
xPcm
xxxy
xy
xyz
zx
z
zy
z
xxx
z
xNN
2
2222
: emittance evolution in a cylindrical symmetric channel
non uniform Bz can cause growth (e.g. flip region)
Z (m)
T (
m r
ad)
ecalc9
MUC-NOTE 0071 prediction
Most of the effect explainedMost of the effect explained
m.apollonio am041207 13
00
1
eq
p
p
00
1
eq
p
p
equilibrium
vacuum growth subtracted
emi. % variation
m.apollonio am041207 15
Conclusion
1)Slow B flip emi growth. Has to be minimized
2)a single absorber seems to work better
3) the middle point cannot have a low beta cooling effect reduced
4) reduce beta_centre increase M1 currents forces
5) better to place abs inside the II solenoid
uneasy6) transmission: large radius spool
piece doesn’t seem to create dramatic effects