Update on ATLAS insertable B-layer

Update on ATLAS IBLG. Darbo – INFN / Genova LHCC, 22 September 2009o

Update on ATLAS

insertable B-layer

Update on ATLAS

insertable B-layer

LHCC Upgrade session

CERN, September, 22nd 2009

G. Darbo - INFN / Genova

Indico agenda page: •http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=67640

Update on ATLAS IBLG. Darbo – INFN / Genova LHCC, 22 September 20092

IBL Project StatusIBL Project StatusProject approved by ATLAS

• Project Leader endorsed by ATLAS CB (February 20th)

• IBL has put in place its management structure (Management Board) – members nominated

ATLAS Institutes Participation• IBL Kick-off (July 8th) meeting with Institute’s Leaders to focus participation in the

project.

• Large interest in the project (~35÷40 institutes participated at the kick-off meeting and have shown interest in parts of the project)

• Project cost evaluated and funding model proposed: 4.0 MCH (M&O-A), 5.6 MCH (M&O-B, new project)

Technical Design Report (TDR)• Main editor / technical editor (K. Einsweiler / M. Capeans) and chapter editors in

charge

• Few editor’s meetings since end of July, TDR foreseen for April 2010.

Memorandum of Understanding foreseen in “interim” form by the end of the year:• MoU will be signed after TDR (spring 2010)


IBL Organisation StructureIBL Organisation Structure

Module WG(2 coordinators)•FE-I4•Sensors•Bump-Bonding•Modules•Test & QC•Irradiation

Module WG(2 coordinators)•FE-I4•Sensors•Bump-Bonding•Modules•Test & QC•Irradiation

Stave WG(1 Phys + 1

Eng.)•Staves•Cooling Design & Stave Thermal Management•HDI•Internal Services•Loaded Stave•Test & QC

Stave WG(1 Phys + 1

Eng.)•Staves•Cooling Design & Stave Thermal Management•HDI•Internal Services•Loaded Stave•Test & QC

IBL Integr.-Install.(2 Eng.)

•Stave Integration•Global Sup.•Beam Pipe (BP)•Ext.services inst.•IBL+BP Installation•Cooling Plant•Test & QC

IBL Integr.-Install.(2 Eng.)

•Stave Integration•Global Sup.•Beam Pipe (BP)•Ext.services inst.•IBL+BP Installation•Cooling Plant•Test & QC

Off-detector(1 Phys + 1 E.Eng.)•Power•DCS•ROD•Opto-link•Ext.serv.design/proc.•Test Beam•System Test

Off-detector(1 Phys + 1 E.Eng.)•Power•DCS•ROD•Opto-link•Ext.serv.design/proc.•Test Beam•System Test

IBL Management BoardMembership:•IBL PL + IBL TC•2 coordinators from each WG•Plus “extra” members

IBL Management BoardMembership:•IBL PL + IBL TC•2 coordinators from each WG•Plus “extra” members

MembershipIBL Project Leader: G. DarboIBL Technical Coordinator: H. Pernegger“Module” WG (2 Physicists): F. Hügging & M. Garcia-Sciveres“Stave” WG (1 Phy. + 1 M.E.): O. Rohne + D. Giugni“IBL Assembly & Installation” WG (2 M.E. initially, a Phy. Later): N. Hartman + R. Vuillermet“Off-detector” WG (1 Phy. + 1 E.E.): T. Flick + S. Débieux“Extra” members:Ex officio: Upgrade Coordinator (N. Hessey), PO Chair (M. Nessi), Pixel PL (B. Di Girolamo), ID PL (P. Wells), Pixel Chair (C. Gößling)Offline “liaison” Pixel Off-line coordinator: A. AndreazzaTDR editor (temporary): K. Einsweiler

Whole project divided into 4 working groups• IBL Management Board has 10 members, plus

“extra” and ex-officio members.

• Frequent meetings (every ~14 days) in this phase of the project.


TDR - ScheduleTDR - ScheduleAction Deadline # Weeks

from previous

TDR Printout, submission to LHCC April 1st 2010 2

Final Draft Deadline for comments March 15th 2010 2

Sent to Collaboration for Approval March 1st 2010 2

Draft 2Deadline for comments Feb 15th 2010 3

Sent to Collaboration Jan 25th 2010 2

Draft 1

Deadline for comments Jan 11th 2010 4

Sent to Collaboration Dec 15th 2009 2

Approval by TDR Editors and PO/USG Dec 1st 2009 2

Preparation

TDR Integration Nov 16th 2009 3

Editors meeting 4 - final internal draft October 19th 2009 3

Editors meeting 3 September 28th 2009 3

Editors meeting 2 September 7th 2009 3

Editors meeting - final chapter’s structure August 19th 2009 3

Editors Kick off meeting July 22nd 2009


SensorSensorTo put here:

• 3 sensor technologies to the prototype phase – decide end of 2010

• Progresses in the development – pick up from sLHC R&D efforts

• How to converge – engineering set of specifications

• Have ~3 slides on sensors


FE-I4FE-I4Put here:

• Status

• Submission review in November

• 1 or 2 slides


Stave DesignStave DesignTo put here

• Layout (preferred)

• Motivate the need of a small beam pipe: tight clearance, gaining 0.5 cm is large respect the available space between BL and present beam pipe, beam pipe bake-out need space for IBL safety (show thermal simulation), use an IBL PST to simplify insertion….

• Show developments:

• Pipe, Thermal Management, Fittings, options

• Goal to reduce material budget from 2.7 to 1.5 %X0

• ~2-3 slides


ScheduleScheduleTo put here

• Plan to install in 2014, even if not sLHC phase I:

• IBL as safety insurance for the present IBL

• Cannot be much before without sacrificing performance, Need new technology development (Sensor, FE-I4, Staves)

• From the machine:

• Need to synchronize a long shutdown (8 months) for IBL installation – in the shadow of machine element installation

• Motivation for an IBL and not a new Pixel (CMS)

• New technology do not allow a large production scale (2 years more)

• Make a replacement of the pixel detector with old technology difficult to find collaboration to make, and also would slow down technology improvement needed for sLHC

• CMS is faster in opening and inserting/connecting the new Pixel system


Some questions to the Machine

Some questions to the Machine

To put here (help from Marzio/Nigel)

• Triplet optimisation will need a new TAS: what are the requirements? – what are the implications for the shielding? This could be a big impact on ATLAS! Implications for the forward muons

• Smaller beam is needed for IB what are the implications of a larger TAS opening and a smaller beam-pipe (and IBL)? What are the concern for the IBL safety?

• What else?

Documents

Update on ATLAS insertable B-layer