Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Debatosh Guha Institute of Radio Physics and Electronics,
University of Calcutta, India
Mysteries of DRA Modes Unresolved Issues for the Future
University College of Science and Technology 1914-2014
On the World Map
● KOLKATA
Our Teachers
C V Raman 1888-1970 NL 1930
S K Mitra 1890-1963
R. N. Tagore 1861-1941 NL 1913
S N Bose 1894-1974
M N Saha 1893-1956
1895 Demonstrated a mechanical operation using WIRELESS at 2.5 GHz
Our Heritage 1895
transmitting Horn
receiving Horn
Bose’s Pyramidal Horn
R e s t i s H i s t o r y
Today’s Presentation
Unknown Mode in Known DRA
31 Years ago 1983-2014
7
Cylindrical-DRA
IEEE MTT Dec. 1984
HEM11δ
m
TM01δ
e m
TE01δ
Mode Nomenclature
TE0 n p+δ TM0 n p+δ HEMm n p+δ
m: number of full-period variations of fields along the azimuth n: half-wave variation along radius (field between center and the periphery) ‘p+δ’: half-wave variation along z-axis of the cylinder
HEM 11δ
Isolated Resonator
10
TM 01δ
Isolated Resonator
11
H
E
Theoretical HEM 12δ Mode
Boundary condition does not allow any ground plane Isolated Resonator
Does it Radiate?
It should
Address the Challange
Boundary Condition demands Horizontal current in place metal
13
x
y
x
z
New approach to realize a current ribbon ??
grounded substrate circular patch
Non-resonant Microstrip Patch
working as a current ribbon
Probe current
First Examination
5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
7.2 GHzS 11(d
B)
Frequency(GHz)
4.6 mm
11.5 mm
εr = 38
Kajfez’s Sample + our Technique
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
cross-polarized
co-polarized
Dire
ctivi
ty(d
Bi)
Theta(degree)
E Plane H Plane
Gain at 7.24 GHz
14
experiments
NMP
DRA
5 6 7
-30
-20
-10
0
5 6 7
S 11
(dB)
measured
Frequency (GHz)
simulated
DRA: εr,d = 10, a = 10 mm, h = 10 mm. NMP r = 5 mm, εr,s = 2.33, t=1.575mm;
2 3 4 5 6 7 82 3 4 5 6 7 8-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
meas
back
S 11 (
dB)
Frequency (GHz)
simu
front
when the feed is alone
Radiations
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180
-20
-10
0
10
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180
-20
-10
0
10 meas
Dire
ctivi
ty (d
Bi)
Angle (degree)
simu co-polarized
cross-polarized
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180
-20
-10
0
10
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180
-20
-10
0
10
Dire
ctivi
ty (d
Bi)
Angle (degree)
simu meas
co-polarized
cross-polarized
E-plane H-plane
f = 7.4 GHz
after 3 decades
16 D. Guha, et al. IEEE AP Transactions, January, 2012
Design Limitations? Unknown Mysteries
zinc tungstate composite
Any limitation in DRA diameter?
Any limitation in DRA height?
Any limitation imposed by the DRA material?
D. Guha, et al. IEEE AP Mag. August 2014
Any other Technique?
Fully planar should be most advantageous; should it be like this?
No, not so straight forward.
Mysteries lie in Current Ribbon with matching; solution needs a different approach.
D. Guha, et al. IEEE AP-S Memphis, 2014
YES! Much Easier and Robust Technique has been developed recently and reported
Excitation Mechanism? Completely NEW
Feed is conventional using vertical Probe.
Ground plane (GP) is a metal sheet.
Boundary condition of GP has been modified favorably which can support HEM12δ mode.
Yet any Other Technique?
Ground Plane
Rect Trough
Probe-Pin
Role of Embedded Truough
ground plane with trough
The Results
RADIATES
RADIATES
D. Guha, et al. IEEE AWPL, 2014
TROUGH causes
Yet Any Other?
Definitely YES
1
Two Different Techniques have been Explored Recently
Composite Aperture – to realize equivalent Magnetic & Electric Dipoles as new Feed
Under investigation………
An Open Book to YOU
2
• Aperture introduces no metal.
• Favors required boundary condition for HEM12δ mode.
• Suitable for HEM11δ mode too.
Suitable Aperture
Aperture Coupled
Why?
εr = 10
Aperture-Feed Explored HEM12δ + HEM11δ
20mm
10mm
3 4 5 6 7 8
-30
-20
-10
0
S 11(d
B)
Freq.(GHz)
Feed1
3 4 5 6 7 8
-30
-20
-10
0
S 11(d
B)
Freq.(GHz)
Feed 2
3 4 5 6 7 8
-30
-20
-10
0
S 11(d
B)
Freq.(GHz)
Feed 3
Feed 1
Feed 2
Feed 3
1 2 3
4
3 4 5 6 7 8
-30
-20
-10
0
HEM12δ
S 11(d
B)
Freq.(GHz)
1 2 3 4
HEM11δ
Impedance vs Feed
2
1
3
4
0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0
-0.2j
0.2j
-0.5j
0.5j
-1.0j
1.0j
-2.0j
2.0j
-5.0j
5.0j
Feed#1
Feed#2
Feed#3
Feed#4
Characterize the Feed
Choose the Right Feed for Higher Mode
Feed1 Feed2 Feed3 Feed40
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
RL Co-Cross Isolation Gain
0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0
-0.2j
0.2j
-0.5j
0.5j
-1.0j
1.0j
-2.0j
2.0j
-5.0j
5.0j
Feed#1 Feed#2 Feed#3
Feed#4
1
2
3
4
What about Dominant Mode?
Select the Optimum One
HEM11δ HEM12δ
Feed#1 Feed#2 Feed#3 Feed#40
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
RL Co-Cross Isolation Gain (dB/dBi)
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Cross-pol
Co-pol
E-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
Feed1 Feed2 Feed3 Feed4
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180-30
-20
-10
0
10
Cross-pol
Co-pol
H-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
Feed1 Feed2 Feed3 Feed4
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180-30
-20
-10
0
10
Cross-pol
Co-pol
E-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
Feed1 Feed2 Feed3 Feed4
Radiation Patterns
HEM11δ HEM12δ
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180-30
-20
-10
0
10
Cross-pol
H-Pl
ane
Gai
n(dB
i)
Angle (degree)
Feed1 Feed2 Feed3 Feed4
Co-pol
Optimized Aperture
Optimized Feed Line
a
b
b a
Optimum Parameters
Table of Parameters Parameters Optimized Value
(mm) In Terms of λ
a 10 0.13λ1 (0.24λ2)
b 2 0.03λ1(0.05λ2)
w 3.6 0.05λ1(0.09λ2)
l 39 0.5λ1(0.95λ2)
p 9 0.12λ1(0.22λ2)
q 3.95 0.05λ1(0.1λ2)
K 11.5 0.15λ1(0.28λ2)
Frequency (f) Wavelength (λ)
3.85GHz(f1) 78mm (λ1)
7.35GHz (f2) 41mm(λ2)
l
w
b
k
q
q
p
l
w
The Prototype
Viewed from Feed-line side
3 4 5 6 7 8-30
-20
-10
0
3 4 5 6 7 8-30
-20
-10
0
Freq(GHz)
measured simulated
HEM12d mode
S 11 (d
B)
HEM11d mode
3 4 5 6 7 8
-30
-20
-10
0
HEM12d mode
S 11(d
B)
Freq (GHz)
measured simulated
HEM11d mode
Measured Results
-120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
10
H-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
measured
cross pol
co pol
simulated
-120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
10
H-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
measured
co pol
cross pol
simulated
-120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
10
E-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
measured
cross pol
co pol
simulated
Measured Radiations
? -120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
10
E-Pl
ane
Gai
n(dB
i)
Angle(degree)
measured
cross pol
co pol
simulated
a i r f i l m
Interesting Observation
Air-film Thickness~ (0.02-0.04)mm
-120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
H-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
measured
cross pol
co pol
simulated (with airfilm)
Closely Follow HEM12δ
-120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
E-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle Theta (degree)
measured
cross pol
co pol
simulated (with airfilm)
-120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
H-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
measured
co pol
cross pol
simulated (with airfilm)
-120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
-120 -60 0 60 120-30
-20
-10
0
E-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Simulated (with airfilm)
co pol
cross pol
E-Pl
ane
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle(degree)
measured
Effect of the air-film
HEM12δ
HEM11δ
Radiation over the Operating Band
Frequency(GHz) 7 7.5 7.2 7.1 7.3 7.4
Location on the spectrum
Is it a Strawberry ?
Unconventional Pattern providing larger Beamwidth
•New feed for CDRA with HEM11δ & HEM12δ modes simultaneously.
• Both the modes with comparable Bandwidth, Gain and Patterns.
•Dual mode dual-band antenna with identical radiations
•Unavoidable air-gap is a new finding, which adds a new feature.
Interesting Features
Known Modes in Unknown Structures
Mongia et al Elect. Lett. 29(17) 1530-1531, 1993.
TM01δ mode after a decade
43
5 10 15-20
-15
-10
-5
0
S 11 (d
B)
Frequency (GHz)
Ittipiboon, Petosa, Thirakoune, Bandwidth enhancement of a monopole using dielectric antenna resonator loading, ANTEM, Canada, Aug. 2002
Marriage of two Monopoles
Lapierre, Antar, Ittipiboon, Petosa, IEEE MWCL, Jan. 2005.
BW 2.9:1
US patent no.6940463 Sept. 2005
Problem bestowed upon
5 10 15 20-40
-30
-20
-10
0 DRR :l= 4.4 mm monopole:l=10 mm DRR+monopole:l=10 mm
Ret
urn
Loss
(dB
)
Frequency (GHz)
?
reduced length monopole 0.6l = λ2/4
Inside the Modes Mystery of BW?
a) Design Frequency first resonances:f1 , third resonances : f3 are related as fH ≈ 2.5 fL. b) Monopole Parameters : Length : l = λL/4 Radius : s≥ r ≥ s/2 (c) DRA Parameters : Spacing s is important for second and third resonances and it is optimum when 0.016 λL ≥ s ≥ 0.013λL and b = r + s, a = b/ 0.3, 0.5 l ≥ h ≥ 0.4l . Finally, εr value is extracted from the TM01 resonance formula
Guha, Antar, Ittipiboon, Petosa, Lee, IEEE AWPL, vol. 5, 2006.
Design Becomes Easy
Design Freq. GHz
λL mm
Antenna Parameters
l mm
s mm
r mm
b mm
a mm
h mm
εr
#1 2-5 150 37.5 1.9 1.0 2.9 9.5 16 25
#2 3 -8 100 25.0 1.4 0.65 1.95 6.5 11 18
#3 5 -13 60 15.0 0.84 0.65 1.49 5.0 6 10
Paper design as per Design Guideline
Verification
2 4 6 8 10 12-30
-20
-10
#1 #2 #3
S 11 (
dB)
Frequency (GHz)
measured
S 11 (
dB)
Frequency (GHz)4 6 8 10 12-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
simulation
Improved Bandwidth?
Definitely Yes! If we can add identical mode(s)
How ? Adding resonators? or Resonances?
Let’s examine the primary resonator if it can help!
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Gain
(dBi
)
Angle Theta (degree)
6 GHz 20 GHz
2009-12
How to accommodate that mode?
By shaping the DRA
What’s New?
DRR radius = 4.2 mm DRR height = 4.4 mm inner cut rad=1.3 mm εr=10 MP height=10 mm MP rad=0.65 mm
5 10 15 20 25 30-40
-30
-20
-10
0
S 11 (d
B)
Frequency (GHz)
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10Di
rect
ivity
(dB
i)
Angle theta (degree)
f=6.8 GHz 13 GHz 16 GHz 20 Ghz
Radiations over the Band
52
The Physical Insight UWB ?
5 10 15 20 25-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
5 10 15 20 25-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
S 11 (d
B)
Frequency (GHz)
5 10 15 20 25-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
5 10 15 20 25-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
S 11 (d
B)
Frequency (GHz)5 10 15 20 25-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
5 10 15 20 25-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
a=5.01 mmS 11
(dB)
Frequency (GHz)
Only MP MP-DRA (Hybrid)
HDRR Alone
Detailed Studies
D. Guha, B. Gupta and Y. M. M. Antar, IEEE AWPL , vol. 8 , 2009
D. Guha, B. Gupta and Y. M. M. Antar, IEEE AP Transactions, Jan., 2012
D. Guha, et al, IEEE AWPL, vol. 5, 2006.
Newer Modes?
and wider Bandwidth?
Yes, Possible
5 10 15 20 25-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
S 11 (d
B)
f (GHz)
BW 148.4%
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
S 11 (d
B)
Frequency GHz
BW 177.5% 54
Composite DRA Structure
D. Guha and Y. Antar: IEEE AP Transactions, Dec. 2006
D. Guha and Y. Antar: IEEE AP Transactions Oct. 2006
Monopole-like Pattern
55
New Approach New Configurations
A′ A
Cylindrical DRA
Coaxial Probe
Central Dielectric Cylinder
30% Bandwidth 0.1λ0 by 0.6 λ0
rad = 10 mm, height= 10 mm εr= 10 central cylinder: rad = 4.143 mm, height= 10 mm εr= 12 probe length = 9.2 mm, radius = 0.55 mm.
56
The Resonances
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Measured SimulationRe
turn
Los
s (d
B)
Frequency (GHz)
Probe as monopole
by DRA
HEM 11d mode 57
Half of a Hemisphere
Half of a Hemisphere Electromagnetically coupled two Half- Hemispherical DRAs
Composite DRA
measured
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Retu
rn L
oss
(dB)
Frequency (GHz)
40% Bandwidth with 4.8 dBi peak gain.
59
Radiation Patterns
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
simulated measured
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle θ (degree)
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
simulated measured
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle θ (degree)
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
simulated measured
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle θ (degree)
simulated measured
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle θ (degree)
φ = 0o φ = 90o
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
60
Symmetric Patterns? how to obtain
Need Modal Symmetry Structural Symmetry
Hemispherical DRA HDRA
Half-HDRA h-HDRA
Quarter-HDRA q-HDRA
61
Quarter and Composite
Introduces Modal Symmetry
Are they Different Modes ?
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5-40
-30
-20
-10
0
S 11 (d
B)
Frequency (GHz)
10 mm 11 mm 12 mm 13 mm
HEM11δ -like mode TM101 mode
63
Perfect Symmetry
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5-20
-10
0
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5-20
-10
0
S 11 (d
B)Frequency (GHz)
simu meas
64
Radiation Patterns
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
Cross-polarized
Co-polarized simu
Gai
n (d
B)
Angle theta (degree)
meas
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle theta (degree)
simu
Cross-polarized
Co-polarized meas
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle theta (degree)
simu
Cross-polarized
Co-polarized meas
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-30
-20
-10
0
10
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle theta (degree)
simu
Cross-polarized
Co-polarized meas
Φ=0 deg Φ=45 deg
3.1 GHz
3.51 GHz
65
Compare
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-15
-10
-5
0
5
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle theta (degree)
Frequency=3.3 GHz
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-15
-10
-5
0
5
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle theta (degree)
Frequency=3.3 GHz
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-15
-10
-5
0
5
Gai
n (d
Bi)
Angle theta (degree)
Frequency=3.7 GHzΦ=900 Φ=00
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-15
-10
-5
0
5
Gai
n(dB
i)
Angle theta (degree)
Frequency=3.7 GHz
66
Concluding Remarks
DRA is still an Open Book; Not event its 30% Explored. DRA researchers should have more insight and serious attention
Resonator, Material, and Antenna need to be addressed together
Next Breakthrough Awaiting New Dielectric Materials
67
I hope to come with new information for you shortly : Mode filtering technique as a potential tool for DRA engineers. Newer Feed to resolve major DRA issues in integrated platform - which is supposed to be very hard task.
2002 Research Studies Press
2007Artech House 2007 McGraw Hill 2008 Elsevier
Dielectric Resonator Antennas: K. M. Luk & K. W. Leung
Dielectric Resonator Antenna Handbook: A. Petosa
Antenna Engineering Handbook: J. L. Volakis Ed.
Dielectric Materials for Wireless Comm: M. T. Sebastian
Related Books
This approach can be extended to other DRA geometries.
Remarks
New Lights for future applications……………………
Behind this small contribution