82
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1, SEMESTER 1 FALL 2014 ANDREW JENNINGS

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

  • Upload
    lehanh

  • View
    216

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO

M.Arch YEAR 1, SEMESTER 1

FALL 2014

ANDREW JENNINGS

Page 2: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1
Page 3: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROJECT STATEMENT

I. X-AXIS, OR LOFTS

On-Axis, Typical

On-Axis, Multiply

On-Axis, Orient

On-Axis, Scale

Off-Axis, Typical

Off-Axis, Multiply

Off-Axis, Orient

Off-Axis, Scale

II. Y-AXIS, OR CAVES AND CRUCIFORMS

Cave

Cruciform

Cave-Cruciform

III. Z-AXIS, OR TOTEMS

Small

Medium

Large

IV. SITE & PROGRAM

Analysis

Axonometric

Plan Oblique

Section

Perspective

4

5

10

11

14

17

20

21

24

27

31

34

40

46

61

64

67

70

73

76

79

80

81

82

Page 4: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

Andrew Jennings

Last house: lost house

The pages ahead document the work from my first year fall semester graduate studio entitled “CONTROL” led by Kelly

Bair and Thomas Kelley at the University of Illinois at Chicago. A majority of the semester was spent extracting three

dimensional forms from a chosen two dimensional roof profile (e.g. gable, gablet, butterfly, shed, dome, etc). I found

the gable roof profile most appealing for its value as a western icon of home and domesticity, something I imagined

could add meaning and interest to the project as the profile was skewed and abstracted in unfamiliar ways.

For the first three parts of this project (X,Y,Z) three dimensional studies occur within a cubed Cartesian grid system and

increase in complexity as X, Y and Z axes are introduced. The studies ultimately find their focus in the modulation of

surface* as a means of amplifying scalar ambiguity of the profile and its associated iconography. Eventually legibility of

house and home become lost.

For the fourth and final part of the project site and program are applied. The previous formal exercises are employed in

the design of a crematorium sited at Graceland Cemetery in Chicago.

*Unofficially referred to throughout the project as “greebling”. Greeble is a science fiction film term for detailing and

texture applied to a surface to communicate greater scale. Examples include the Death Star in Star Wars, Nostromo in

Alien, or the Borg Cube in Star Trek. Frank Lloyd Wright’s Ennis House is often used in film (most famously as Rick

Deckard’s apartment in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner) for its elaborate tiling which is used almost retroactively as a kind

of greeble after the fact.

4

Page 5: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

X

Page 6: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1
Page 7: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

X Axis

The first part of the studio focused on altering the roof profile in only the X-direction. Three strategies of extruding the

profile were utilized: multiplication, orientation, and scale. These explorations were divided into two categories of on

and off axis. On axis movements maintained a vector parallel to the X-direction whereas off axis movements skewed

right or left.

X

Y

Z

7

Page 8: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

X

Typical

Page 9: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

Gable

ON / OFF 000

Page 10: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

10

Page 11: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

11

Page 12: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

12

Page 13: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

13

Page 14: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

14

Page 15: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

15

Page 16: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

16

Page 17: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

17

Page 18: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

18

Page 19: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

19

Page 20: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

20

Page 21: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

21

Page 22: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

22

Page 23: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

23

Page 24: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

24

Page 25: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

25

Page 26: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

26

Page 27: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

27

Page 28: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

28

Page 29: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

29

Page 30: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

30

Page 31: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

Y

Page 32: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

32

Page 33: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

Y Axis

The second part of the studio opened operations into the Y-direction. Now explorations could be made simultaneously

along both the X and Y axis. Objects were placed into one of three categories: Cave, Cruciform, and Cave/Cruciform.

Each page spread displays one object viewed from both sides of the Y-axis. Further explorations were made through

birdseye and wormseye projections based in the drawing style of Auguste Choisy.

Y

X

Z

Side A

Side B

Y

X

Z

Side B

Side A

33

Page 34: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

34

Page 35: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

35

Page 36: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

36

Page 37: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

37

Page 38: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

38

Page 39: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

39

Page 40: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

40

Page 41: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

41

Page 42: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

42

Page 43: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

43

Page 44: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

44

Page 45: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

45

Page 46: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

46

Page 47: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

47

Page 48: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

48

Page 49: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

49

Page 50: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

50

Page 51: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

51

Page 52: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

52

Page 53: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

53

Page 54: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

54

Page 55: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

55

Page 56: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

56

Page 57: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

57

Page 58: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

58

Page 59: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

59

Page 60: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

60

Page 61: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

Z

Page 62: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1
Page 63: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

Z Axis

The third part of the studio opened operations into the third and final Z-direction. The primary mode of exploration

was the totem. Previous models from X and Y were stacked and integrated into one another to create singular vertical

objects. The final models I created are categorized into three scales of S, M, and L.

X

Y

Z

63

Page 64: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

64

Page 65: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

65

Page 66: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

66

Page 67: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

67

Page 68: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

MediumMedium

68

Page 69: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

MediumMedium

69

Page 70: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

70

Page 71: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

71

Page 72: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

72

Page 73: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

Site

&

Program

Page 74: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1
Page 75: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

Site & Program

For the fourth and final portion of the studio Site and Program were applied. A location within Graceland Cemetery,

an urban cemetery in the middle of Chicago, was assigned to each student and a choice of cemetery program (i.e.

columbarium, mausoleum, ossuary, tumulus, etc) could be made. The final mechanical abstractions of the Z-axis

assignment encouraged my choice of a crematorium which I sited in the southeast corner of the cemetery.

75

Page 76: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

76

Page 77: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

77

Page 78: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

78

Page 79: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

XYZ

AxonometricCrematorium

79

Page 80: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

XYZ

Plan ObliqueCrematorium

80

Page 81: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

XYZ

SectionCrematorium

81

Page 82: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO M.Arch YEAR 1

XYZ

PerspectiveCrematorium

82