University of Chicago Library Guide to the Hans Zeisel

University of Chicago Library

Guide to the HansZeisel Papers 1925-1992

© 2015 University of Chicago Library

Table of Contents

3Descriptive Summary3Information on Use3Access3Restrictions on Use3Citation4Biographical Note5Scope Note7Related Resources8Subject Headings8INVENTORY8Series I: Personal9Series II: Correspondence13Series III: Consulting21Series IV: Teaching22Series V: Research22Subseries 1: Juries23Subseries 2: Death Penalty25Subseries 3: Other Legal Research31Subseries 4: Social Science and Statistical Research36Subseries 5: General Research Files39Series VI: Projects and Studies40Subseries 1: General Jury Project56Subseries 2: Criminal Jury Project63Subseries 3: Civil Jury Project79Subseries 4: Death Penalty Projects84Subseries 5: Other Projects87Series VII: Writings87Subseries 1: General Writings89Subseries 2: Books97Subseries 3: Articles101Subseries 4: Speeches and Conference Papers102Subseries 5: Reports and Testimony103Subseries 6: Criticism104Series VIII: Writings by Others105Series IX: Audiovisual110Series X: Oversize110Series XI: Restricted111Subseries 1: Financial and Personnel Material112Subseries 2: Student Material112Subseries 3: Legal Correspondence112Subseries 4: Death Penalty Cases114Subseries 5: Consulting

3

Descriptive Summary

Identifier ICU.SPCL.ZEISELH

Title Zeisel, Hans. Papers

Date 1925-1992

Size 91.5 linear feet (173 boxes)

Repository Special Collections Research CenterUniversity of Chicago Library1100 East 57th StreetChicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A.

Abstract Hans Zeisel (1905-1992) was a scholar of law and social science at theUniversity of Chicago Law School. He was an expert on juries, capitalpunishment, and political and market survey techniques. He served on thefaculty of the University of Chicago Law School from 1953 until 1974.There, as one of the leaders of the well-known Jury Project, Zeisel stroveto apply social research methodology to the field of law. This collectionincludes a small amount of personal ephemera and teaching materials, butis primarily comprised of correspondence; materials from his work as alitigation consultant; research files concerning law, social science, and avariety of other topics; materials related to the Jury Project and other studieshe undertook; his own writings and writings by others; and audio and visualrecordings. Materials date between 1925 and 1992, with the bulk datingbetween 1950 and 1992. The papers document the wide variety of Zeisel’sacademic interests and his scholarly and professional efforts to improve theadministration of justice.

Information on Use

Access

This collection is open for research with the exception of material in Series XI. This seriescontains restricted financial and personnel information; student material; correspondence; andconsulting materials. The financial and personnel information is restricted for fifty years fromdate of record creation, and will be fully open in 2042. The rest of the materials in Series XI arerestricted for eighty years from date of record creation and will be fully open in 2072.

Restrictions on Use

Series IX, Audiovisual, does not include an access copy for the audio and video recordings.Researchers will need to consult with staff before requesting these items.

Citation

4

When quoting material from this collection, the preferred citation is: Zeisel, Hans. Papers, [Box#, Folder #], Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.

Biographical Note

Hans Zeisel was born in Czechoslovakia in 1905 and raised in Vienna. He attended theUniversity of Vienna, earning a law degree in 1927 and a doctorate in political science in 1928.Zeisel worked closely with prominent sociologist Paul F. Lazarsfeld. Together with Lazarsfeld’swife, Marie Jahoda, they published the influential work Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal: Einsoziographischer Versuch über die Wirkungen langdauernder Arbeitslosigkeit in 1933. (AnEnglish edition, Marienthal: The Sociography of an Unemployed Community, was published in1971.)

In 1938 he married Eva Stricker, an internationally-known ceramics designer. They hadtwo children: Jean Richards, an actress, and John Zeisel, an architect. John Zeisel taught atHarvard’s Graduate School of Design and started a firm that conducted social science researchfor architects in order to help them determine the special needs of their clients.

Following the Anschluss in 1938, Zeisel left Austria for the United States where he worked in theburgeoning field of market research, holding positions at advertising agency McCann-Ericksonand the Tea Council. During this time he also taught sociology at Columbia and RutgersUniversities. In 1947 Zeisel published Say It With Figures, a text published in six editions andseven languages due to its clear explanation of the methodology of survey data.

In 1953 he was appointed to the faculty of the University of Chicago Law School as part ofDean Edward Levi’s initiative to bolster the study of social science and the law. There he workedclosely with Professor Harry Kalven, Jr., another leader of the Law School’s Jury Project. TheJury Project, an empirical study of the American jury system, led to the publication of Delayin the Court (1959) and The American Jury (1966). The former text concerned the role of thejury in court congestion that plagued civil litigation and the latter concerned the jury systemin criminal trials. A third volume, a text on the civil jury entitled The American Civil Jury, wasnever published, but drafts and notes are included in this collection.

After Kalven’s death in 1974, Zeisel collaborated frequently with psychologist Shari SeidmanDiamond. The two co-authored numerous articles concerning the effectiveness of the justicesystem. In 1983 Zeisel authored The Limits of Law Enforcement, which argued that thebest way to deter criminal activity was to improve the social environment (particularly youtheducation) rather than bolstering law enforcement efforts.

Zeisel frequently served as a litigation consultant on issues pertaining to survey methodology,particularly change-of-venue matters and trademark confusion lawsuits. Most famously, he

5

aided Ford Motor Company in their litigation following the Pinto fuel tank scandal. In additionto many commercial companies, Zeisel served as a consultant for the U.S. War Department,the U.S. Department of Justice, the Rand Corporation, and the American Bar Associationthroughout his career. A fervent opponent of the death penalty, he also consulted on numerouscapital punishment cases, seeking to demonstrate both that the death penalty did not function asa deterrent to crime and that it was often applied in a racially discriminatory manner.

Zeisel was a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American StatisticalAssociation, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He was a memberof the governing board of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. In 1967 Zeisel received the Awardfor Exceptionally Distinguished Achievement from the American Association for Public OpinionResearch, the organization’s highest honor. In 1992 Zeisel was the recipient of the Paul F.Lazarsfeld Award for his contributions to the field of quantitative social research.

Zeisel died in 1992 in Chicago. His final book, Prove It With Figures: Empirical Methods inLaw and Litigation, was published posthumously in 1997 by co-author David Kaye.

Scope Note

This collection is divided into eleven series:

I. Personal

II. Correspondence

III. Consulting

IV. Teaching

V. Research

VI. Projects and Studies

VII. Writings

VIII. Writings by Others

IX. Audiovisual

X. Oversize

XI. Restricted

6

Detailed series descriptions are found at the beginning of each series in the inventory section ofthe guide.

I. Personal: Contains personal and biographical materials concerning Zeisel’s career and family.

II. Correspondence: Contains correspondence between Zeisel and his colleagues, both academicand professional. Correspondents of note (highlighted in the inventory) include actress KatharineHepburn, First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, activist Coretta Scott King, and several Supreme Courtjustices, among others. Some correspondence is written in German.

III. Consulting: Includes correspondence, surveys, reports, court documents, and notes relatedto Zeisel’s work as a litigation consultant. He advised companies and their legal counsel onmatters concerning trademark infringement and confusion, jury selection, and general surveyand sampling techniques. It also includes Zeisel’s evaluations of grant proposals and articles forinstitutions like the National Science Foundation. Consulting files related to specific litigationand not part of the public record are located in Series X: Restricted.

IV. Teaching: Contains course materials such as syllabi, exams, and readings, related to hiscourses on social science research in the law and capital punishment.

V. Research: Consists of subject files related to Zeisel’s legal and social science research as wellas his personal interests. These files include articles, memoranda, notes, and other documentsgathered in the course of his research. His general research files include topics as wide-ranging asliterature, science, and political conditions in Europe and Russia.

VI. Projects and Studies: Contains documents such as questionnaires, research proposals,correspondence, and reports related to Zeisel’s many projects applying social science to the law.The bulk of the series concerns the University of Chicago Law School’s Jury Project that wasled primarily by Harry Kalven Jr., and Hans Zeisel. The other subseries include files relatedto Zeisel’s work opposing the death penalty; the Law School’s arbitration and tax projects;and studies of automobile accidents and court delay. Subseries One: The General Jury Projectcontains materials related to the jury recordings scandal of 1955. The Project’s recording of jurydeliberations (with the consent of the court) in Wichita, Kansas became public and resultedin hearings before the United States Senate’s Internal Security Sub-Committee. Dean EdwardH. Levi testified before the committee under subpoena, but the Committee did not ultimatelypenalize the Law School or its faculty.

VII. Writings: Includes drafts, research, notes, and reviews related to Zeisel’s many publishedworks – such as his books, articles, book reviews, and letters to the editor. It also contains

7

drafts of unpublished writings, including short essays and the third book from the Universityof Chicago Jury Project, The American Civil Jury, as well as copies of his many speeches,government testimony, and reports.

VIII. Writings by Others: Consists of drafts of writings authored by Zeisel’s colleagues, as wellas related correspondence and research materials. In particular, this series contains drafts ofthe German poetry anthology that Zeisel engaged translator Max Knight to assemble, alongwith their correspondence concerning the project, though the anthology was never ultimatelypublished.

IX. Audiovisual: Contains cassette tapes, VHS tapes, audio and videotape reels, and photographs.These materials generally relate to Zeisel’s role as a litigation consultant, but they also includerecordings of Zeisel’s academic lectures and debates, as well as recordings from the University ofChicago Law School’s Jury Project.

X. Oversize: Includes press clippings, computer data printouts, and posters related to a variety ofZeisel’s research and teaching interests.

XI. Restricted: Consists of restricted financial, personnel, student, and legal material. Legalfiles concern the University of Chicago Law School’s Jury Project, Zeisel’s work as a consultanton death penalty cases, and Zeisel’s work as a litigation consultant for commercial companies.Materials in Subseries One are restricted for fifty years from date of record creation and will befully open in 2042. Materials in Subseries Two-Five are restricted for eighty years from date ofrecord creation. Materials in Subseries Two will be fully open in 2071. Materials in SubseriesThree-Five will be fully open in 2072.

Related Resources

The following related resources are located in the Department of Special Collections:

http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/spcl/select.html

Archival Biographical Files

Blum, Walter J. Papers

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Records

Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan. Papers

Levi, Edward H., Papers

8

University of Chicago. Law School. Jury Project. Records

University of Chicago. Law School. Arbitration Study. Records

Subject Headings

• Kalven, Harry• Zeisel, Hans• University of Chicago. Law School• Capital punishment• Jury--United States• Law and the social sciences--United States• Legal research• Social science

INVENTORY

Series I: Personal

This series contains personal and biographical materials concerning Zeisel. It includes Zeisel’scurriculum vitae and profiles of his career, as well as documents related to his membership inprofessional societies, the work of his wife Eva Zeisel and children John Zeisel and Jean Richards,and his obituary and memorial.

Box 1Folder 1

American Academy of Arts and Sciences – correspondence, membership form, and eventprogram, 1985-1991

Box 1Folder 2

The American Austrian Foundation – correspondence, meeting documents, and reports,1984-1988

Box 1Folder 3

American Sociological Association – Paul F. Lazarsfeld Award, 1992Box 1Folder 4

Biographical Materials and Curriculum Vitae, circa 1970s-1980sBox 1Folder 5

Leonard Boudin – memorial statement, 1989Box 1Folder 6

Family Documents, circa 1980sBox 1Folder 7

Mailing List and AddressesBox 1

9

Folder 8Master List for Files at Home, undated

Box 1Folder 9

Obituaries and Memorial, 1992Box 1Folder 10

Print sample – Neiman-Marcus fashion awards program, 1949Box 1Folder 11

Profiles of Zeisel, 1974-1983Box 1Folder 12

Scrapbook documents, circa 1990Box 1Folder 13

University of Chicago Law School – Zeisel Chair, 1990Box 1Folder 14

Eva Zeisel – correspondence and clippings, circa 1985-1989

Series II: Correspondence

This series includes correspondence between Zeisel and his colleagues, both academic andprofessional. It is arranged alphabetically by the correspondent’s name, though correspondenceconcerning The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists and the death penalty is grouped topically andlisted accordingly. Correspondents of note (highlighted in the inventory) include actressKatharine Hepburn, First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, activist Coretta Scott King, and severalSupreme Court justices, among others. Some correspondence is written in German.

Box 1Folder 15

A, 1963-1992Box 1Folder 16

A, 1963-1992Box 1Folder 17

B, 1945-1992Box 2Folder 1

B, 1945-1992Box 2Folder 2

B, 1945-1992• Including Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan

Box 2

10

Folder 3The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 1960-1985

Box 2Folder 4

C, 1962-1992Box 2Folder 5

C, 1962-1992Box 2Folder 6

D, 1960-1992Box 2Folder 7

D, 1960-1992Box 2Folder 8

Death Penalty, 1955-1992Box 2Folder 9

Death Penalty, 1955-1992Box 3Folder 1

E, 1967-1992Box 3Folder 2

F, 1955-1992Box 3Folder 3

F, 1955-1992Box 3Folder 4

F, 1955-1992• Including Judge Marvin Frankel of the Southern District of New York

Box 3Folder 5

G, 1968-1992Box 3Folder 6

H, 1950-1992Box 3Folder 7

H, 1950-1992Box 3Folder 8

H, 1950-1992• Including Katharine Hepburn

11

Box 3Folder 9

I, 1963-1992Box 4Folder 1

J, 1953-1992• Including Watergate Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski

Box 4Folder 2

Juries, 1955-1992Box 4Folder 3

K, 1956-1992Box 4Folder 4



K, 1956-1992• Including Coretta Scott King

Box 4Folder 7

L, 1954-1992Box 4Folder 8



M, 1967-1992Box 5Folder 2



N, 1962-1992Box 5Folder 5

12



O, 1969-1986• Including Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor

Box 5Folder 8

P, 1960-1992Box 6Folder 1



R, 1958-1992• Including Eleanor Roosevelt

Box 6Folder 4

S, 1954-1992Box 6Folder 5

S, 1954-1992• Including Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart

Box 6Folder 6

T, 1961-1991Box 6Folder 7

U-V, 1958-1992Box 7Folder 1

U-V, 1958-1992Box 7Folder 2

W-X, 1959-1991Box 7Folder 3

W-X, 1959-1991• Including Supreme Court Justice Byron White

Box 7Folder 4

13

Y-Z, 1942-1991Box 7Folder 5

Unidentified, 1958-1992Box 7Folder 6

Unidentified, 1958-1992

Series III: Consulting

This series contains files related to Zeisel’s consulting work. It is arranged alphabetically by topic,generally by the name of the institution or case with which Zeisel was connected. He advisedcompanies and their legal counsel on matters concerning trademark infringement and confusion,jury selection, and general survey and sampling techniques. Files largely contain correspondence,consumer surveys and reports, public-record court documents, notes, and related research. Thisseries also includes Zeisel’s evaluations of grant proposals and articles for institutions like theNational Science Foundation. Consulting files related to specific litigation and not part of thepublic record are located in Series XI: Restricted.

Box 7Folder 7

Alfredo – consumer awareness surveys and notes, undatedBox 7Folder 8

Ronald J. Allen – probability and civil trials – research proposal, 1987Box 7Folder 9

American Bar Foundation – correspondence, questionnaires, and press clippings, circa1974-1976

Box 7Folder 10

American Journal of Sociology – peer review forms, circa 1983Box 8Folder 1

American Judicature Society – article review and correspondence, 1983-1984Box 8Folder 2

Audits and Surveys Inc. – customer surveys regarding outdoor lighting, 1979Box 8Folder 3

Austria Program, circa 1973 (German)Box 8Folder 4

Avis – civil complaint and floral directory, 1977Box 8Folder 5

Baker’s Square – survey, 1985

14

Box 8Folder 6

Baker v. F. & F. Investment – court document and reports related to sampling, undatedBox 8Folder 7

BankCard Holders of America – court documents, insurance survey, 1981-1984Box 8Folder 8

Berlitz Publications v. Charles Berlitz – Zeisel court testimony, 1970Box 8Folder 9

California Cooler – Zeisel affidavit, 1984Box 8Folder 10

Canadian news media – questionnaire and comments, 1972Box 8Folder 11

Centaur Communications v. A/S/M Communications – court decision, transcript, andappellant brief, 1986-1987

Box 8Folder 12

Christie’s – survey, 1986Box 8Folder 13

Clairol – affidavit, 1984Box 8Folder 14

Contac – surveys, undatedBox 8Folder 15

Continental Oil & Gas – loan charts, 1988Box 8Folder 16

The Continuing Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia – correspondence, 1985Box 9Folder 1

Dallas Popcorn Shrimp – surveys and notes, 1986Box 9Folder 2

Marshall Dayan – North Carolina v. Michael Ray Quesinberry – court documentsregarding the death penalty, 1987, 1988

Box 9Folder 3

Dershowitz – affidavit, 1971Box 9Folder 4

15

Dukes of Hazzard – Zeisel affidavits and court documents, 1981-1982Box 9Folder 5

Edison Brothers Stores Inc. (Notorious) – affidavit, 1986Box 9Folder 6

Educational Testing Service – correspondence and court documents, 1983Box 9Folder 7

Fifty-five mph speed limit – National Academy of Sciences – correspondence and reports,1983-1984

Box 9Folder 8

Fifty-five mph speed limit – typescript draft report, Senate transcripts, clippings, andnotes, 1986-1988

Box 9Folder 9

Florida v. Patton – Zeisel affidavit, 1982Box 9Folder 10

Free v. Peters – Zeisel affidavit, 1990Box 9Folder 11

Bernard Grofman, “Modelling Jury Verdicts,” Modules and Monographs inUndergraduate Mathematics and Its Applications Project, 1982

Box 9Folder 12

Gun Control – articles and court documents, 1981-1985Box 9Folder 13

Gun Control – articles and court documents, 1981-1985Box 10Folder 1

Marion Harper, Jr. – correspondence, clippings, and tributes, 1964-1987Box 10Folder 2

Hurt v. Coyne Cylinder Co. – Zeisel affidavit, 1990Box 10Folder 3

Illinois v. Yates – Zeisel testimony, 1979Box 10Folder 4

Interpublic Annual Report, 1987Box 10Folder 5

IRS – strategic report and comments, 1984-1985

16

Box 10Folder 6

IRS – survey critiques, 1985Box 10Folder 7

Isotoner gloves – surveys, court documents, and gloves, 1977Box 10Folder 8

Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences – article review, 1984Box 10Folder 9

Journal of Quantitative Criminology – article evaluation, 1985Box 10Folder 10

Justice Quarterly – manuscript for peer review, 1985Box 10Folder 11

LaSalle Extension University – survey, report, and Federal Trade Commission decision,1980

Box 10Folder 12

Litton – answer to appeal brief, 1980Box 10Folder 13

L’Oreal – court opinion, 1984Box 10Folder 14

L’Oreal/Zazu Designs – court opinion, 1988Box 10Folder 15

Lysol – Spray Disinfectant Study, 1974Box 10Folder 16

Mars Inc. v. Curtiss Candy Company – court brief and argument, circa 1972Box 11Folder 1

McClellan v. Friberg – opinion and order, 1975Box 11Folder 2

McDonald’s -- McSleep/Quality Inns – court opinion, 1988Box 11Folder 3

Mitre – memorandum regarding the Public Defender’s office, circa 1968Box 11Folder 4

Nevenka Mulc – correspondence, affidavit, and exhibits regarding Yugoslav customs, 1988

17

Box 11Folder 5

National Science Foundation – assorted evaluations and related correspondence, circa1972-1978

Box 11Folder 6

National Science Foundation – comparative study of legal ordering proposal andevaluation, 1973

Box 11Folder 7

National Science Foundation – death penalty beliefs proposal evaluation, 1984Box 11Folder 8

National Science Foundation – ethics proposal and evaluation, 1975-1976Box 11Folder 9

National Science Foundation – general correspondence, 1969-1973Box 11Folder 10

National Science Foundation – Grofman proposal and evaluation, 1974-1975Box 11Folder 11

National Science Foundation – homicide memoranda, data, and coding sheets, 1978Box 11Folder 12

National Science Foundation – interactional models for jury decisions proposal andevaluation, 1973

Box 11Folder 13

National Science Foundation – judicial decision-making proposal, evaluation, and articlereprints, 1963

Box 11Folder 14

National Science Foundation – juror selection proposal and evaluation, 1973Box 11Folder 15

National Science Foundation – jurors’ perceptions proposal and evaluation, 1976Box 12Folder 1

National Science Foundation – jury econometrics proposal and evaluation, 1978Box 12Folder 2

National Science Foundation – jury size proposal and evaluation, 1982Box 12Folder 3

18

National Science Foundation – law and social science research proposal and evaluation,1971

Box 12Folder 4

National Science Foundation – legal methods for combating inflation proposal andevaluation, 1970

Box 12Folder 5

National Science Foundation – pretrial delay proposal and evaluation, 1976Box 12Folder 6

National Science Foundation – probate system proposal, evaluation, and correspondence,1969-1970

Box 12Folder 7

National Science Foundation – program announcements and report related to municipalsystems, 1973

Box 12Folder 8

National Science Foundation – programs, grant lists, and reports related to social sciencegrants and law school conference, 1963-1972

Box 12Folder 9

National Science Foundation – Social Indicators/Gordon proposal and evaluation, 1978Box 12Folder 10

National Science Foundation – Social Indicators/Lambert proposal, 1975-1976Box 12Folder 11

National Science Foundation – systems analytic study of Detroit’s criminal justice systemproposal and evaluation, 1970

Box 12Folder 12

National Science Foundation – videotaped trial – articles, proposal, and evaluation,1976-1983

Box 12Folder 13

Norfolk and Western Railway – correspondence and court transcript, 1981Box 12Folder 14

Norfolk and Western Railway – correspondence and court transcript, 1981Box 12Folder 15

Ohaus scales – questionnaires and photographs, 1980-1981Box 12Folder 16

19

Oil of Life – court documents, 1978-1979Box 13Folder 1

Optical Radiation – correspondence and court documents, 1984-1985Box 13Folder 2

Pharmacists – surveys, 1983Box 13Folder 3

Pizza Rolls – court documents, 1980-1983Box 13Folder 4

Police Foundation – correspondence, 1976-1977Box 13Folder 5

Pratt & Whitney – report, circa 1961Box 13Folder 6

Producer’s Cottage Cheese – consumer confusion study, 1988Box 13Folder 7

Quaker Oats Company – Federal Trade Commission hearing transcript, 1962Box 13Folder 8

Revson v. Max Factor – affidavits, court documents and transcript, 1977Box 13Folder 9

Royal Crown – correspondence, reports, and data, 1986-1991Box 13Folder 10

Rubik’s Cube – affidavits and other court documents, 1981-1983Box 13Folder 11

Jessica Savitch survey data, circa 1983Box 13Folder 12

Secondary meaning research and notes, circa 1989Box 13Folder 13

Sterling Drug Inc. – Federal Trade Commission decision and order, 1981Box 13Folder 14

Synchronics trial consultants – correspondence and promotional materials, 1989Box 13Folder 15

Textron – notes, undated

20

Box 13Folder 16

Trademark research, 1969-1990Box 13Folder 17

Unidentified consulting documents, circa 1982-1992Box 13Folder 18

United States v. Lee Linton – Zeisel affidavit, 1981Box 13Folder 19

United States v. Randy Thomas Lanier – court documents related to change of venue,1988

Box 14Folder 1

United States v. Russo and Ellsberg – affidavit regarding motion for mistrial, 1972Box 14Folder 2

United States v. Victor Manuel Gerena – court documents related to change of venue,1986

Box 14Folder 3


Box 14Folder 4


Box 14Folder 5

United Steelworkers – court documents, 1977Box 14Folder 6

Universitat Konstanz conference documents, 1983-1984 (German)Box 14Folder 7

Washington Public Power Supply System – affidavit of Dr. Peter W. Sperlich, 1984Box 14Folder 8

Washington Public Power Supply System – affidavit of Donald E. Vinson, 1984Box 14Folder 9

Washington Public Power Supply System – correspondence and court documents,1986-1987

Box 14Folder 10

21

Washington Public Power Supply System – “Economic Impacts and Public Perceptions: AReport on WPPSS’s Nuclear Construction Projects,” by Kenneth D. Walters and WilliamC. Erxleben, 1983

Box 15Folder 1

Washington Public Power Supply System – mock voir dire transcript, 1984Box 15Folder 2

West Point – report on honor system survey, 1974Box 15Folder 3

Wickersham – decision and transcripts, 1982-1983Box 15Folder 4



Zeisel affidavit regarding passport race categories, 1945Box 15Folder 7

Zeisel manuscript evaluations, circa 1976-1986

Series IV: Teaching

This series includes course materials from Zeisel’s time as a law professor at the University ofChicago Law School. Files include syllabi, exams, and reading materials related to his variouscourses on social science research in the law and capital punishment.

Box 16Folder 1

Capital punishment course materials, 1969Box 16Folder 2

David Kaye – Arizona State University College of Law final examinations, 1979-1981Box 16Folder 3

Law school calendar, 1988Box 16Folder 4

Lecture and assignment notes, undatedBox 16Folder 5

Research methodology seminar materials, 1953-1967Box 16

22

Folder 6Social science research course materials, circa 1970s/1980s

Box 16Folder 7

Statistics and the law – syllabus and assignments, 1975Box 16Folder 8

Workshop on empirical research in the law – correspondence, memoranda, and articles,1967-1969

Series V: Research

This series is divided into five subseries: Juries; Death Penalty; Other Legal Research; SocialSciences and Statistical Research; and General Research Files. Each subseries is arrangedalphabetically, by topic. The first two subseries relate to the two primary areas of Zeisel’s legalresearch, as demonstrated by his involvement in the University of Chicago Law School’s JuryProject and his consultant work on capital punishment cases. The files in these subseries includearticles, memoranda, notes, and other documents gathered in the course of Zeisel’s scholarlyresearch on these subjects. Documents relating to his studies of jury behavior and citizens’ viewsof the death penalty are located in the relevant subseries of Series VI: Projects and Studies.Subseries Three and Four concern broader areas of Zeisel’s academic focus and contain articles,correspondence, memoranda, and notes. Subseries Four: Social Science and Statistical Researchincludes files related to Zeisel’s proposed, but never published, book of statistical detectivestories, designed to bolster student interest in statistics through mystery stories. Subseries Fiveincludes files that run the breadth of Zeisel’s personal interests, including literature, science, andpolitical conditions in Europe and Russia.

Subseries 1: Juries

Box 16Folder 9

Civil juries – article drafts and reprints, reports, circa 1958-1992Box 16Folder 10

Complex cases – reports and articles, 1982-1984Box 16Folder 11

Criminal juries – article drafts and reprints, 1985-1991Box 16Folder 12

Discrimination – Castaneda, Sheriff v. Partida – court decision, 1977Box 16Folder 13

Free press – correspondence and memorandum, 1980, 1984Box 17Folder 1

23

General jury research – articles, memorandum, correspondence, and press clippings, circa1980-1991

Box 17Folder 2

Juror selection – Northern District of California – “General Order No. 6,” – plan forrandom selection of jurors, 1983

Box 17Folder 3

Juror selection – regression analysis memo, 1983Box 17Folder 4

Jury size – article, reports, court opinion, 1970-1989Box 17Folder 5

Jury trials abroad – reports and notes, circa 1950s/1960sBox 17Folder 6

Jury trials abroad – reports and notes, circa 1950s/1960sBox 17Folder 7

Jury waivers – book reports, memoranda, and notes, circa 1953-1967Box 17Folder 8

Reading lists, 1976-1977Box 17Folder 9

Michael Saks – articles and book reviews, 1975-1987Box 17Folder 10

Workman’s compensation – book reports and memorandum, 1953, 1967

Subseries 2: Death Penalty

Box 17Folder 11

Amnesty International – correspondence, report, and press clippings, 1980-1989Box 17Folder 12

Court documents – opinions, deposition transcripts, and post-trial brief, circa 1963-1992Box 17Folder 13

Death penalty abroad – reports, notes, and press clippings, circa 1950-1988Box 18Folder 1

Death row – advocacy groups’ bulletin and reports, 1984-1987Box 18Folder 2

24

Deterrence – articles and correspondence regarding David P. Phillips’s work, 1979-1981Box 18Folder 3

Deterrence – articles and notes, 1977-1986Box 18Folder 4

Isaac Ehrlich – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1970-1987Box 18Folder 5

Isaac Ehrlich – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1970-1987Box 18Folder 6

Errors – newspaper photocopies, circa 1980-1984Box 18Folder 7

Gallup poll – survey, correspondence, and data, 1980-1985Box 18Folder 8

General death penalty research – article drafts and reprints, 1959-1991Box 18Folder 9

General death penalty research – article drafts and reprints, 1959-1991Box 18Folder 10

General death penalty research – notes and press clippings, circa 1953-1985 (photocopies)Box 19Folder 1

Jury instructions – article and court documents, 1983-1991Box 19Folder 2

Literature – essays and poetry, circa 1957-1989 (photocopies)Box 19Folder 3

Memoranda and data tables, undatedBox 19Folder 4

Public opinion – article drafts and reprints, data, and press clippings, circa 1977-1984Box 19Folder 5

Racial bias – statistics and press clipping, undatedBox 19Folder 6

“Social Science Research and the Death Penalty in America: An Interim Report,” RussellSage Foundation, 1973

Box 19Folder 7

25

Texas Judicial Council Capital Murder Study, 1976

Subseries 3: Other Legal Research

Box 19Folder 8

Bail – articles and notes, 1973-1981Box 19Folder 9

Charles Black – article reprints and poems, circa 1983-1987Box 19Folder 10

Constitution – article drafts and reprints, 1986-1987Box 19Folder 11

Crime charging – charging standards and article, 1974-1975Box 19Folder 12

Crime charging – charging standards and article, 1974-1975Box 19Folder 13

Crime reports – articles, correspondence, and notes, circa 1963-1985Box 19Folder 14

Crime reports – articles, correspondence, and notes, circa 1963-1985Box 20Folder 1

Deceptive advertising – court decisions and articles, circa 1967-1984Box 20Folder 2



Deterrence – articles, press clippings, and notes, 1952-1990Box 20Folder 5



Deterrence – articles, press clippings, and notes, 1952-1990Box 21

26

Folder 1Deterrence – articles, press clippings, and notes, 1952-1990

Box 21Folder 2



Dismissal rates – correspondence and notes, 1978-1979Box 21Folder 5

Domestic violence – correspondence and Department of Justice bulletins, 1986-1989Box 21Folder 6

Drug monitoring – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1989-1990Box 21Folder 7

Expert witnesses -- articles, circa 1986Box 21Folder 8

Expunction – articles, press clipping, and notes, 1971-1987Box 21Folder 9

Eyewitness testimony – articles, circa 1970sBox 21Folder 10

Fact and law – court opinions and notes, 1979-1986Box 22Folder 1

General legal research notes, undatedBox 22Folder 2

General press clippings, circa 1953-1986 (photocopies)Box 22Folder 3

Inequality – notes, undatedBox 22Folder 4

Insanity and crime – reports and notes, 1982-1983Box 22Folder 5

Judicial decisions – articles and notes, 1956-1984Box 22Folder 6

27

Judicial decisions – articles and notes, 1956-1984Box 22Folder 7

Justice and morality – articles and correspondence, circa 1959-1987Box 22Folder 8

David Kaye – article reprints and correspondence, 1979-1985Box 22Folder 9

David Kaye – article reprints and correspondence, 1979-1985Box 22Folder 10

Legal articles – drafts and photocopies, 1968-1992Box 22Folder 11

Legal articles – drafts and photocopies, 1968-1992Box 23Folder 1

Legal articles – reprints, 1952-1991Box 23Folder 2

Legal articles – reprints, 1952-1991Box 23Folder 3

Legal newsletters, 1968-1988Box 23Folder 4

Miranda – articles and correspondence, 1954-1967Box 23Folder 5

Missouri Bar – Prentice-Hall survey report, circa 1960sBox 23Folder 6

Natural law – book reviews, speech, and notes, 1954-1988Box 23Folder 7

Obscenity – articles, reports, project proposal, and notes, 1952-1957Box 23Folder 8



Parole – reports, articles, and correspondence, 1957-1979

28

Box 24Folder 2

Plea bargaining – articles, 1976-1983Box 24Folder 3

Police – articles and reports, 1972-1983Box 24Folder 4

Pornography – Cass R. Sunstein statement before the Department of Justice and articlereprint, 1984, 1991

Box 24Folder 5

“Positivism” in Criminology – memorandum, undatedBox 24Folder 6

Precedent – Case and Comment issues and clippings, circa 1955-1956Box 24Folder 7

Pretrial detention – correspondence, articles and reports related to Vera Institute of Justicestudy, 1970-1971

Box 24Folder 8

Pretrial detention – research and documents related to Zeisel Senate subcommitteetestimony, 1969-1973

Box 24Folder 9


Box 25Folder 1


Box 25Folder 2

Prison statistics – memorandum (German) and notes, circa 1960s/1970sBox 25Folder 3

Prosecutorial discretion – memorandum and article, 1959, 1987Box 25Folder 4

Racial discrimination – articles and court decisions, 1953-1982Box 25Folder 5


29








Reading notes, undatedBox 26Folder 4

William Rehnquist – court opinions and press clippings, 1968, 1985-1987Box 26Folder 5

Responsibility – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1952-1965Box 26Folder 6




Sentencing – articles and correspondence, 1965-1983Box 27Folder 2

Sentencing – articles and correspondence, 1965-1983Box 27Folder 3

Sex offenses – notes and newspaper photocopy, circa 1991

30

Box 27Folder 4

Social sciences and the law – articles, correspondence, and reports, 1967-1990Box 27Folder 5




Sociology of law – articles and notes, circa 1949-1963Box 28Folder 1



Louis B. Sohn, “Role of International Law and International Institutions as Conflict-Adjusting Agencies,” draft, 1960

Box 28Folder 4

Louis B. Sohn, “Role of International Law and International Institutions as Conflict-Adjusting Agencies,” draft, 1960

Box 28Folder 5

Transitional Aid Research Project (TARP) – articles and correspondence, 1976-1981Box 28Folder 6

Tribune crime debate – report, article draft and reprints, 1986-1988Box 28Folder 7

Victims – article and reports, circa 1975-1981Box 28Folder 8

Victim surveys – Law Enforcement Assistance Administration – correspondence, reports,and surveys, 1972-1977

Box 28Folder 9


31

Box 29Folder 1


Box 29Folder 2

Videotape in court – articles, bibliography, and newspaper photocopies, 1972-1980Box 29Folder 3

Wealth or poverty – “Annotation on: Counsel’s Appeal in a Civil Case to Wealth orPoverty of Litigants as Ground for Mistrial, New Trial, or Reversal,” American LawReports, 1953

Box 29Folder 4

Jack B. Weinstein – articles concerning equality and the law, 1979-1982Box 29Folder 5

Franklin E. Zimring – draft legal articles, 1982-1983

Subseries 4: Social Science and Statistical Research

Box 29Folder 6

Bayes’ Theorem – articles and Forensic Science Society documents, 1983-1988Box 29Folder 7

Gary S. Becker, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior – chapters 1 and 4, 1976Box 29Folder 8

Case studies – summaries, court opinions, and notes, circa 1956-1980Box 29Folder 9

Causation – articles and correspondence, 1963, 1983Box 29Folder 10

Ronald H. Coase – articles and correspondence, circa 1978-1986Box 30Folder 1

Consumer Price Index – Department of Labor reports, 1978-1991Box 30Folder 2

Controlled experiments – articles and notes, circa 1957-1991Box 30Folder 3

Correlation – articles and law school admission bulletins, circa 1964-1981Box 30Folder 4

32

Counting and condensing data – articles, court opinions, and notes, circa 1977-1991Box 30Folder 5

Crime statistics – articles, correspondence, and memoranda, 1970-1989Box 30Folder 6

Employment discrimination – articles and court decision, 1980-1986Box 30Folder 7



David A. Freedman – articles on the census, modeling, and statistics, 1985-1991Box 31Folder 1

General social science research – articles, reports, and notes, circa 1966-1991Box 31Folder 2

General social science research – articles, reports, and notes, circa 1966-1991Box 31Folder 3

General statistics research – articles, reports, and course documents, 1966-1989Box 31Folder 4

General statistics research – articles, reports, and course documents, 1966-1989Box 31Folder 5

Graphs – articles, correspondence, Zeisel lecture, notes, circa 1979-1987Box 31Folder 6



David Kaye – articles on probability, 1979-1987Box 32Folder 1

Legal experiment methodology – articles and notes, 1956-1988Box 32Folder 2

Legal experiment methodology – articles and notes, 1956-1988

33

Box 32Folder 3

Legal experiments – progress reports and assessment, undatedBox 32Folder 4

Legal probability sampling – articles, sampling plans, and notes, circa 1957-1985Box 32Folder 5

Motivation – articles and notes, undatedBox 32Folder 6

Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann – articles and correspondence, 1978-1984Box 32Folder 7

Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann – proposal and report regarding legal surveys, 1988Box 32Folder 8

Nomographs – tables and market research reports, circa 1969Box 33Folder 1

Obscenity – community standard surveys and reports, circa 1987Box 33Folder 2

David Phillips – articles and correspondence, 1982-1986Box 33Folder 3

Philosophy – articles and notes, 1949-1959Box 33Folder 4

Polygraph tests – articles and reading lists, 1973-1984Box 33Folder 5

Poverty – correspondence, articles, and press clippings, 1968-1985Box 33Folder 6

Probability – articles and notes, circa 1961-1990Box 33Folder 7

Probability – articles and notes, circa 1961-1990Box 33Folder 8

“Proceedings of the American Association for Public Opinion Research,” – conferencesummaries, 1950, 1954

Box 33Folder 9

Psychoanalysis – articles, memorandum, and notes, circa 1958-1980

34

Box 33Folder 10

Questionnaires – articles, correspondence, and sample questionnaires, 1954-1980Box 33Folder 11

Racial discrimination and statistics – articles, reports, correspondence, and notes,1946-1983

Box 34Folder 1

Racial discrimination and statistics – articles, reports, correspondence, and notes,1946-1983

Box 34Folder 2

Racial discrimination and statistics – textbook supplement and court decision, 1986, 1989Box 34Folder 3

Randomized response – articles and notes, circa 1971-1987Box 34Folder 4

Reading lists, circa 1957-1982Box 34Folder 5

Sampling designs – articles and instructions, circa 1976-1980Box 34Folder 6

Sampling error – articles and graphs, circa 1969-1983Box 34Folder 7

Sampling general research – articles, reports, and notes, circa 1960-1990Box 34Folder 8




Sampling nonresponse – articles, memoranda, and notes, circa 1978-1991Box 35Folder 3

Sampling in U.S. government agencies – report and court opinions, 1970Box 35Folder 4

35

Sex discrimination – articles and notes, circa 1977-1981Box 35Folder 5

Statistical Detective – articles and correspondence, 1972-1977Box 35Folder 6

Statistical Detective binder – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1964-1976Box 35Folder 7






Statistics as evidence – articles, correspondence, and notes, circa 1947-1987Box 36Folder 4





Survey evidence – articles, court opinions, and notes, circa 1961-1990Box 37Folder 2

Survey evidence – articles, court opinions, and notes, circa 1961-1990Box 37Folder 3

Survey evidence – articles, court opinions, and notes, circa 1961-1990

36

Box 37Folder 4

Surveys – articles and notes, circa 1960s/1970sBox 37Folder 5

Theory – articles and notes, circa 1957-1982Box 37Folder 6

Amos Tversky – articles and correspondence, 1985-1990

Subseries 5: General Research Files

Box 37Folder 7

American Newspaper Publishers Association – report on convention proceedings, 1976Box 37Folder 8

Anti-Semitism and Nazism – articles, correspondence, and report, 1981-1991Box 38Folder 1

Austria – articles and correspondence, 1968-1989Box 38Folder 2

Austria – Ludwig Radermacher – picture book (photocopy) and descriptions of Austriandestinations, circa 1929

Box 38Folder 3

The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists – related articles, 1967, 1982Box 38Folder 4

Subrahmanya Chandrasekhar – articles and correspondence, circa 1984-1991Box 38Folder 5

German articles and clippings, circa 1980-1989Box 38Folder 6

German coding sheets, article, and notes (Hamburg), circa 1973Box 38Folder 7

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe – articles, correspondence, and poems, circa 1948-1983Box 38Folder 8

Marion Harper Jr. – correspondence, notes, and clippings regarding memorial lecture andHarper’s legacy, 1962-1990

Box 38Folder 9

Industrial design – correspondence and journal copies, 1990-1991

37

Box 38Folder 10

Ruth and Elihu Katz – articles and correspondence, 1973-1991Box 38Folder 11

Paul F. Lazarsfeld Lecture – correspondence and programming documents, 1949-1991Box 38Folder 12

Nathan Leites, “Aspects of Michelangelo,” – typescript copy, circa 1986Box 38Folder 13

Literature – articles, correspondence, and notes, circa 1954-1985Box 39Folder 1

Konrad Lorenz – articles by Lorenz, 1955-1973 (German)Box 39Folder 2

Konrad Lorenz – articles on Lorenz and ethology, circa 1956-1987 (German)Box 39Folder 3

Konrad Lorenz – articles on Lorenz and ethology, circa 1956-1987 (German)Box 39Folder 4

Konrad Lorenz – correspondence and notes, 1960-1989Box 39Folder 5

Konrad Lorenz – correspondence and notes, 1960-1989Box 39Folder 6

Marxism – articles, notes, and clippings, circa 1948-1979Box 39Folder 7



Mathematical games – article and tangram puzzles, circa 1974Box 40Folder 2

Miscellaneous clippings, 1952-1991Box 40Folder 3

Miscellaneous files – articles, reports, and notes, circa 1970-1991Box 40

38

Folder 4Miscellaneous files – articles, reports, and notes, circa 1970-1991

Box 40Folder 5

Morality and Ethics – articles and correspondence, 1984-1987Box 40Folder 6

Victor Neiderhoffer – article and company brochure, 1987Box 40Folder 7

Oedipus Rex – articles and notes, circa 1966Box 40Folder 8

Organ transplants – correspondence, pamphlets, and notes, 1989Box 40Folder 9

Philosophy – article, correspondence, and notes, circa 1981-1989Box 40Folder 10

Poetry – photocopies of poems and related cartoon, undatedBox 40Folder 11

Karl Polanyi – articles, conference documents, and newsletters, 1981-1990Box 40Folder 12

Karl Polanyi – articles, conference documents, and newsletters, 1981-1990Box 41Folder 1

Karl Polanyi – correspondence and notes, circa 1981-1991Box 41Folder 2


The Red Cross – articles, reports, and correspondence, 1943-1988Box 41Folder 4

The Red Cross – articles, reports, and correspondence, 1943-1988Box 41Folder 5

The Red Cross – S.Z. Kantor – report and correspondence, 1943-1960Box 41Folder 6

Religion in America – Gallup report and Princeton newsletters, 1985, 1987Box 41Folder 7

39

Science articles, circa 1969-1976Box 41Folder 8

Socialism – articles, correspondence, and clippings, circa 1960-1991Box 41Folder 9

Socialism – articles, correspondence, and clippings, circa 1960-1991Box 41Folder 10

The Soviet Union – articles, 1984, 1986Box 41Folder 11

Leo Szilard – articles, correspondence, clippings, and drawing, circa 1960-1991Box 41Folder 12

Unanswered research – correspondence and clippings, 1985-1990

Series VI: Projects and Studies

This series contains documents related to Zeisel’s many projects related to social science and thelaw. The bulk of the series concerns the University of Chicago Law School’s Jury Project that wasled primarily by Harry Kalven Jr., and Hans Zeisel. It is divided into five subseries: General JuryProject; Criminal Jury Project; Civil Jury Project; Death Penalty Projects; and Other Projects.Each subseries is arranged alphabetically, by topic.

The General Jury Project subseries includes documents such as proposals, reports, questionnaires,and research that relate to the Jury Project as a whole. In particular, it contains correspondence,memoranda, and testimony pertaining to the jury recordings scandal of 1955; the project’srecording of jury deliberations (with the consent of the court) in Wichita, Kansas became publicand resulted in hearings before the United States Senate’s Internal Security Sub-Committee.Dean Edward H. Levi testified before the committee under subpoena, but the Committee didnot ultimately penalize the Law School or its faculty. Subseries One also includes questionnaireresponses from numerous national embassies concerning jury procedures in their countries, aswell as files related to the debate over the shrinking size of federal juries in the 1970s and 1980s,a subject on which Zeisel testified before the United States Senate as an expert.

The second and third subseries contain documents related to juries in criminal trials and civiltrials, respectively. Subseries Two primarily includes interview forms and resulting summariesfrom studies of criminal juries in Cook County and New Jersey. Subseries Three includes courttranscripts, interview forms, summaries, and coding sheets from studies of civil juries in CookCounty, New Jersey, and Minnesota, in addition to studies of split trials, wherein civil trials aredivided between sessions that determine fault and those that determine damages.

Subseries Four: Death Penalty contains surveys from a study of jurors’ views on the deathpenalty and life imprisonment without parole, as well as correspondence, memoranda, and courttranscripts from cases involving capital punishment.

40

Subseries Five: Other Projects contains documents from studies on arbitration, taxation policy,automobile accidents, and court delay, among others. Such documents generally includecorrespondence, project reports and memoranda, and questionnaires.

Subseries 1: General Jury Project

Box 41Folder 13

Blue ribbon juries – memoranda and notes, circa 1953-1956Box 42Folder 1

Blue ribbon juries – memoranda and notes, circa 1953-1956Box 42Folder 2

Dale Broeder – articles – reprints, 1965-1966Box 42Folder 3

Dale Broeder – articles – typescript drafts, circa 1950s-1960sBox 42Folder 4

Dale Broeder – “Bauer v. Hill Trucking Company,” – typescript draft, 1957Box 42Folder 5

Dale Broeder – “Bauer v. Hill Trucking Company,” – typescript draft, 1957Box 42Folder 6

Dale Broeder – case reports and memoranda, circa 1950s-1960sBox 42Folder 7

Dale Broeder – “A Series of Cross-Case Essays on Jury Behavior,” – typescript draft, 1957Box 42Folder 8

Dale Broeder – “A Series of Cross-Case Essays on Jury Behavior,” – typescript draft, 1957Box 43Folder 1

Dale Broeder – untitled typescript draft chapters, circa 1950s-1960sBox 43Folder 2

Burden survey – correspondence, questionnaires, and research, 1953-1971Box 43Folder 3

Burden survey – correspondence, questionnaires, and research, 1953-1971Box 43Folder 4

Change of venue/publicity – correspondence, articles, and clippings, 1953-1981Box 43

41

Folder 5Change of venue/publicity – correspondence, articles, and clippings, 1953-1981

Box 43Folder 6

Complex cases – correspondence, articles, and notes, 1979-1986Box 43Folder 7

Complex cases – data on jury composition, undatedBox 43Folder 8

Credibility – memorandum and article, 1957, 1959Box 43Folder 9

Debate – article, memorandum, and notes, circa 1950sBox 43Folder 10

Decision making – articles, reports, and notes, circa 1953-1957Box 44Folder 1

Discrimination – Zeisel affidavit regarding female jurors in DuPage County, 1977Box 44Folder 2

Earlier jury studies – article reprints and typescript drafts, 1925-1956Box 44Folder 3

Econometric model – “A Model of the Jury Decision Process,” by Alvin K. Klevorick andMichael Rothschild, 1978

Box 44Folder 4

Experimental jury – Conway v. International Drug Co./Precision Appliance Corp. –questionnaires, memorandum, and trial script, 1955

Box 44Folder 5

Experimental jury – Doyle v. Miller – questionnaires, memorandum, and trial scripts,1954-1956

Box 44Folder 6

Experimental jury – Doyle v. Miller – questionnaires, memorandum, and trial scripts,1954-1956

Box 44Folder 7

Experimental jury – Haynes v. Keeley – questionnaires, 1971Box 44Folder 8

Experimental jury – Haynes v. Keeley – trial scripts, 1971Box 44

42

Folder 9Experimental jury – Keeley v. Haynes – trial scripts, 1956

Box 45Folder 1

Experimental jury – The People v. Martin Graham – trial script and questionnaires, 1955Box 45Folder 2

Federal service – juror qualification questionnaire, undatedBox 45Folder 3

Films – Trial by Jury summary, 1948Box 45Folder 4

First Ballot Study – questionnaires, data, and coding sheets, 1954-1955Box 45Folder 5

Five out of six verdicts – correspondence, court document, and clipping, 1981-1982Box 45Folder 6

Ford Foundation – correspondence, 1954-1956Box 45Folder 7

Abe Fortas – notes by Harry Kalven Jr., 1969Box 45Folder 8

General correspondence, 1955-1961Box 45Folder 9

General jury research – articles and court opinions, 1964-1991Box 45Folder 10

Bernard Grofman – typescript draft and reprint articles concerning jury decision-making,1974-1975

Box 45Folder 11

Guide to the Jury Project Papers and related memoranda, 1976-1977Box 45Folder 12

History of the American jury – reports and book notes, undatedBox 45Folder 13

History of the American jury – untitled typescript draft by Robert Poole, undatedBox 46Folder 1

History of the English jury – book notes and untitled typescript draft, undatedBox 46

43

Folder 2Hung juries – articles, questionnaires, and clippings, 1952-1983

Box 46Folder 3

Hung juries – articles, questionnaires, and clippings, 1952-1983Box 46Folder 4

Hung juries – articles, questionnaires, and clippings, 1952-1983Box 46Folder 5

The Judge’s Opinion of the Jury – questionnaires, undatedBox 46Folder 6

The Judge’s Opinion of the Jury – questionnaires, undatedBox 46Folder 7

Judges’ reports on yearly number of trials, undatedBox 46Folder 8

Juries abroad – articles and clippings, 1955-1970Box 46Folder 9

Juries abroad – Austria – correspondence, memoranda, and clippings, 1955-1968Box 46Folder 10

Juries abroad – Britain – correspondence and reports from the Cropwood Round-tableConference on the Jury System, 1973-1974

Box 46Folder 11

Juries abroad – Britain – correspondence and reports from the Cropwood Round-tableConference on the Jury System, 1973-1974

Box 47Folder 1

Juries abroad – Britain – correspondence, article reprint, and notes from the University ofBirmingham study, 1979-1980

Box 47Folder 2

Juries abroad – Britain – general correspondence, reports, and charts, 1955-1980Box 47Folder 3

Juries abroad – Britain – general correspondence, reports, and charts, 1955-1980Box 47Folder 4

Juries abroad – Britain – majority verdicts – London Times clippings, correspondence, andnotes, 1953-1972

Box 47

44

Folder 5Juries abroad – Britain – unanimous verdicts – correspondence and notes, 1970-1974

Box 47Folder 6

Juries abroad – correspondence with embassies, questionnaires, and notes, 1953-1970Box 47Folder 7



Juries abroad – Denmark – correspondence, 1957-1963Box 47Folder 10

Juries abroad – Germany – memorandum, questionnaire, notes, and maps, 1954-1970Box 47Folder 11

Juries abroad – India – correspondence, 1954-1970Box 47Folder 12

Juries abroad – Japan – memorandum, article reprint, and notes, 1961-1970Box 47Folder 13

Juries abroad – Norway – correspondence and article, 1953, 1961Box 47Folder 14

Juries abroad – Scotland – correspondence and article, 1972, 1976Box 48Folder 1

Juries abroad – Soviet Union – correspondence, clipping, and notes, 1967-1970Box 48Folder 2

Juries abroad – Sweden – articles and notes, circa 1962-1975Box 48Folder 3

Juries abroad – Sweden – questionnaire and report, 1969-1974Box 48Folder 4

Juries abroad – Switzerland – correspondence and reports, 1956-1970 (German)Box 48Folder 5

Juries abroad – Yugoslavia – questionnaires, circa 1969Box 48Folder 6

45

Juror attitudes – questionnaires and article, circa 1975Box 48Folder 7

Juror costs – reports, clippings, and notes, 1952-1957Box 48Folder 8



Juror interviews – memoranda, report, and notes, 1934-1957Box 48Folder 11

Juror Interview Schedules – questionnaires and interview forms, 1957Box 48Folder 12

Juror Interview Schedules – questionnaires and interview forms, 1957Box 48Folder 13

Juror manuals, circa 1938-1959Box 49Folder 1

Juror manuals, circa 1938-1959Box 49Folder 2

Juror memoirs – articles, essays, and correspondence, 1954-1963Box 49Folder 3

Juror memoirs – articles, essays, and correspondence, 1954-1963Box 49Folder 4

Juror qualification questionnaires, 1979-1981Box 49Folder 5

Juror questionnaires, 1957Box 49Folder 6

Juror questionnaires, 1957Box 49Folder 7

Jurors’ fees – article reprints and clippings, 1955-1960Box 49Folder 8

Juror utilization – correspondence and project report, 1975

46

Box 49Folder 9

Jury Classification System – outline, 1953Box 49Folder 10

Jury codes in state constitutions, undatedBox 50Folder 1

Jury composition – press release, 1976Box 50Folder 2

Jury deliberations – article reprints, clippings, and notes, 1956-1976Box 50Folder 3

Jury diagrams, undatedBox 50Folder 4

Jury in fiction – notes, undatedBox 50Folder 5

Jury foreperson – Zeisel testimony transcript and articles, circa 1981Box 50Folder 6

Jury instructions comprehension – correspondence, article reprint, and report, 1978-1982Box 50Folder 7

Jury instructions – Illinois – commentary, circa 1960Box 50Folder 8

Jury instructions – Illinois – commentary, circa 1960Box 50Folder 9

Jury instructions – Illinois – correspondence, speech, and jury instructions, circa 1960Box 50Folder 10

Jury instructions – Minnesota – memoranda, coding sheets, and data tables, 1957-1959Box 50Folder 11

Jury instructions – Minnesota – memoranda, coding sheets, and data tables, 1957-1959Box 50Folder 12

“The Jury in Nineteenth Century America,” by Robert Poole, undatedBox 51Folder 1

Jury Project memoranda, 1952-1959Box 51

47

Folder 2Jury Project memoranda, 1952-1959

Box 51Folder 3

Jury Project memoranda, 1952-1959Box 51Folder 4

Jury Project memoranda, 1952-1959Box 51Folder 5

Jury Project memoranda – binder, 1952-1953Box 51Folder 6

Jury Project memoranda – binder, 1952-1953Box 51Folder 7

Jury Project speeches – K. N. Llewellyn and Judge Clark, 1956Box 51Folder 8

Jury Project speeches – “Report on the Jury Project of the University of Chicago LawSchool” by Harry Kalven Jr. – reprints, 1955-1957

Box 52Folder 1

Jury Project speeches – “Report on the Jury Project of the University of Chicago LawSchool” by Harry Kalven Jr. – typescript drafts, 1955

Box 52Folder 2


Box 52Folder 3


Box 52Folder 4

Jury Project study outlines, circa 1954Box 52Folder 5

Jury recordings – American Psychological Association – correspondence and article,1955-1956

Box 52Folder 6

Jury recordings – Herbert Brownell, Jr. – correspondence and speech, 1955Box 52Folder 7

Jury recordings – Warren E. Burger – correspondence and speech, 1955

48

Box 52Folder 8

Jury recordings – clippings and proposed laws, 1956Box 52Folder 9

Jury recordings – correspondence, 1953-1959Box 52Folder 10

Jury recordings – correspondence, 1953-1959Box 52Folder 11

Jury recordings – Glenn W. Ferguson, “Legal Research on Trial,” in the Journal of theAmerican Judicature Society, 1955

Box 53Folder 1

Jury recordings – Judge Delmas C. Hill – correspondence regarding disposition of jurymaterials, 1955-1975

Box 53Folder 2

Jury recordings – House and Senate committee reports, 1956Box 53Folder 3

Jury recordings – Paul Kitsch – correspondence, 1955-1956Box 53Folder 4

Jury recordings – memoranda, 1955-1956Box 53Folder 5

Jury recordings – memoranda, 1955-1956Box 53Folder 6

Jury recordings – notecards related to project’s correspondence and memoranda,1953-1955

Box 53Folder 7

Jury recordings – Warren Olney III – correspondence, 1955Box 53Folder 8

Jury recordings – Press release to the Los Angeles Times, 1955Box 53Folder 9

Jury recordings – Senate Internal Security Sub-Committee – correspondence, reports, andquestionnaires, 1952-1956

Box 53Folder 10

49


Box 53Folder 11


Box 53Folder 12

Jury recordings – Senate Internal Security Sub-Committee – hearing transcripts – Levi andKalven testimony, 1955

Box 54Folder 1

Jury recordings – Senate Internal Security Sub-Committee – hearing transcripts – Levi andKalven testimony, 1955

Box 54Folder 2

Jury recordings – Senate Internal Security Sub-Committee – memoranda, statements, andtestimony, 1955

Box 54Folder 3

Jury recordings – Senate Internal Security Sub-Committee – memoranda, statements, andtestimony, 1955

Box 54Folder 4

Jury recordings – Senate Internal Security Sub-Committee – subpoena for Dean EdwardH. Levi, 1955

Box 54Folder 5

Jury recordings – statements of progress and support by Harry Kalven Jr., N. K. Llewellyn,Albert J. Harno, and other prominent legal figures, 1955

Box 54Folder 6

Jury recordings – survey, reports, and article, 1955-1957Box 54Folder 7

Jury size – American Bar Association Project – articles, correspondence, and reports,1971-1990

Box 54Folder 8

Jury size – American Bar Association Project – articles, correspondence, and reports,1971-1990

Box 54Folder 9

Jury size – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1955-1980Box 54Folder 10

50

Jury size – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1955-1980Box 54Folder 11

Jury size – mini-trials – correspondence and concept paper, 1988Box 55Folder 1

Jury size – public choice – articles and notes, circa 1970sBox 55Folder 2

Jury size – smaller than six – correspondence and clipping, 1983-1984Box 55Folder 3

Jury size – Herbert Solomon, “Jury Size and Jury Verdicts,” in Communication inStatistics – typescript draft and reprints, 1983

Box 55Folder 4

Jury size – states – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1972-1990Box 55Folder 5

Jury size – states – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1972-1990Box 55Folder 6

“Jury trial and Public Trial Requirement,” – typescript draft, undatedBox 55Folder 7

Jury waiver – questionnaires, memoranda, data, and notes, 1954-1957Box 55Folder 8

Harry Kalven Jr. – “The Jury in Auto Cases: Invitation to Research,” Virginia LawWeekly, 1956

Box 55Folder 9

The Lawyer’s Opinion of the Jury – questionnaires, undatedBox 55Folder 10



Length of trial – correspondence, memoranda, and data, 1956-1957Box 56Folder 1

Los Angeles County Trial Court Survey – correspondence and questionnaires, 1954-1960Box 56

51

Folder 2Management – reprint and typescript draft guides to jury management andcorrespondence, 1970-1980

Box 56Folder 3

Management – reprint and typescript draft guides to jury management andcorrespondence, 1970-1980

Box 56Folder 4

Bernard D. Meltzer, “A Projected Study of the Jury as a Working Institution,” – reprints,1953

Box 56Folder 5

Mock trial – jury screening form, clipping, and notes, circa 1987-1992Box 56Folder 6

National Science Foundation – voir dire project correspondence, budgets, and bills,1970-1973

Box 56Folder 7

National Science Foundation – voir dire project grant application, 1972Box 56Folder 8

New Jersey Juror Interview Project – questionnaires, correspondence, and memoranda,1957-1958

Box 56Folder 9

New Jersey Juror Interview Project – questionnaires, correspondence, and memoranda,1957-1958

Box 56Folder 10

Note-taking – correspondence and notes, 1958-1974Box 56Folder 11

Peremptory challenges – articles and correspondence, 1978-1990Box 56Folder 12

Personality tests – questionnaire and coding sheets, undatedBox 56Folder 13

Post-trial interrogations – “Report to the Committee on Operation of the Jury System,”from the Sub-committee on Post-trial Interrogation of Jurors and correspondence –photocopies, 1972

Box 57Folder 1

Pre-trial conferences – articles and reports, 1956-1978

52

Box 57Folder 2

Pre-trial conferences – articles and reports, 1956-1978Box 57Folder 3

Public opinion surveys, undatedBox 57Folder 4

Questions by jury – Center for Jury Studies Newsletter, 1981Box 57Folder 5

The representative jury – research materials, circa 1950sBox 57Folder 6

The representative jury – research materials, circa 1950sBox 57Folder 7

Research binder – legal studies of the jury, circa 1954Box 57Folder 8

Research binder – legal studies of the jury, circa 1954Box 58Folder 1

Right to counsel – cases and legal research course reference material, 1949-1954Box 58Folder 2

Right to counsel – cases and legal research course reference material, 1949-1954Box 58Folder 3

“Right to a Jury in Federal Courts,” by Robert Hamilton, undatedBox 58Folder 4

Right to a trial by jury – reports, typescript article drafts, and notes, circa 1953-1954Box 58Folder 5




Right to a trial by jury – reports, typescript article drafts, and notes, circa 1953-1954Box 59

53

Folder 1Second Circuit conference talk, undated

Box 59Folder 2

“The Selection of Jurors,” by Daniel Feldman, undatedBox 59Folder 3

Selection – Boston – “The Venire of Jurors and Grand Jurors in Boston, Massachusetts forthe Year 1963,” report by Zeisel, 1965

Box 59Folder 4

Selection – Chicago – questionnaire data, reports, and notes, circa 1977Box 59Folder 5

Selection – Chicago – questionnaire data, reports, and notes, circa 1977Box 59Folder 6

Selection – correspondence and memorandum regarding legal requirements, 1956-1971Box 59Folder 7

Selection – general research – correspondence, articles and clippings, 1956-1990Box 59Folder 8

Selection – Faye Girsh Goldberg, “Jury Selection,” – typescript draft chapter in theManual for Federal Defenders, 1977

Box 59Folder 9

Selection – Illinois – reports, circa 1975Box 60Folder 1

Selection – juror questionnaires, 1953-1954Box 60Folder 2

Selection – New York – qualification form and memoranda, 1955Box 60Folder 3

Selection – source lists – article and typescript draft, 1977, 1980Box 60Folder 4

Selection – surveys and report, 1982Box 60Folder 5

Selection – surveys, selection guides, and notes, 1981-1990Box 60Folder 6

Service – correspondence, articles, data, and notes, 1953-1976

54

Box 60Folder 7

Service – correspondence, articles, data, and notes, 1953-1976Box 60Folder 8

Shadow jurors – Survey Center correspondence, juror agreement, and notes, circa 1988Box 60Folder 9

Six-man jury – articles, correspondence, and reports, 1971-1976Box 60Folder 10

Six-man jury – articles, correspondence, and reports, 1971-1976Box 60Folder 11

Six-man jury – House Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration ofJustice – statements and Zeisel testimony, 1974

Box 60Folder 12

Six-man jury – Senate Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery –correspondence and bill, 1973-1974

Box 60Folder 13

Six-man jury – Zeisel articles and memorandum, 1982-1982Box 61Folder 1

Struck jury – correspondence and articles, 1976Box 61Folder 2

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume I, 1956Box 61Folder 3

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume II, 1956Box 61Folder 4

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume III, 1956Box 61Folder 5

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume IV, 1956Box 61Folder 6

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume V, 1956Box 61Folder 7

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume VI, 1956Box 61Folder 8

55

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume VII, 1956Box 61Folder 9

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume VIII, 1956Box 61Folder 10

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume IX, 1956Box 62Folder 1

Swygert cases – Broeder memoranda and typescript drafts – Volume X, 1956Box 62Folder 2

Swygert cases – notes and catalogue of Broeder memoranda, 1956Box 62Folder 3

Swygert cases – Volume XI – “Voir Dire Examinations,” – typescript drafts, 1956Box 62Folder 4

Televised trial – correspondence, 1978Box 62Folder 5

Tenney advisory group luncheon – correspondence and questionnaires, 1957Box 62Folder 6

Tenth Judicial Circuit Annual Conference – transcript of proceedings and statement, circa1955-1956

Box 62Folder 7

Total number of jurors – correspondence and memorandum, 1955Box 62Folder 8

Unanimous verdicts – correspondence and questionnaire, 1982Box 62Folder 9

Unidentified notes, undatedBox 62Folder 10

Voir dire – anonymous jury – United States v. Barnes – correspondence and courtdocuments, 1978

Box 62Folder 11

Voir dire – correspondence, articles, and clippings, 1956-1980Box 62Folder 12

Voir dire – “Jury Selection for the Harrisburg Conspiracy Trial” by the HarrisburgResearch Collective, undated

56

Box 63Folder 1

Voir dire – sources – article reprints, 1965-1974Box 63Folder 2

Voir dire – sources – typescript draft and article photocopies and clippings, circa1965-1975

Box 63Folder 3

Voir dire – sources – typescript draft and article photocopies and clippings, circa1965-1975

Box 63Folder 4

Voir dire – Zeisel affidavits and correspondence, 1974-1978

Subseries 2: Criminal Jury Project

Box 63Folder 5

Anonymity – correspondence, court document, and clippings, 1979-1984Box 63Folder 6

Attitudes toward defendant – report on juries’ sympathy and net leniency, undatedBox 63Folder 7

Continuities in research – article and memoranda, circa 1976Box 63Folder 8

Cook County – jury demand – 50/50 chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms,1955-1957

Box 63Folder 9

Cook County – jury demand – 50/50 chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms,1955-1957

Box 63Folder 10

Cook County – jury demand – 50/50 chance of lighter penalty – counsels’ interviewforms, 1956

Box 63Folder 11

Cook County – jury demand – coded interview forms, circa 1954-1957Box 63Folder 12

Cook County – jury demand – good chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms, circa1956

Box 64Folder 1

57

Cook County – jury demand – poor chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms,1956-1957

Box 64Folder 2

Cook County – jury demand – poor chance of lighter penalty – counsels’ interview forms,1954-1957

Box 64Folder 3

Cook County – jury demand – poor chance of lighter penalty – counsels’ interview forms,1954-1957

Box 64Folder 4

Cook County – jury demand – sample correspondence and interview forms, 1957Box 64Folder 5

Cook County – jury waiver – 50/50 chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms,1956-1957

Box 64Folder 6

Cook County – jury waiver – 50/50 chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms,1956-1957

Box 64Folder 7

Cook County – jury waiver – 50/50 chance of a lighter penalty – counsels’ interviewforms, 1954-1957

Box 64Folder 8

Cook County – jury waiver – coded interview forms, circa 1954-1957Box 64Folder 9

Cook County – jury waiver – good chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms,1955-1957

Box 65Folder 1

Cook County – jury waiver – good chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms,1955-1957

Box 65Folder 2

Cook County – jury waiver – good chance of a lighter penalty – counsels’ interview forms,1957

Box 65Folder 3

Cook County – jury waiver – poor chance of acquittal – counsels’ interview forms, 1957Box 65Folder 4

Cook County – jury waiver – poor chance of a lighter – counsels’ interview forms, 1957

58

Box 65Folder 5

Criminal record – Zeisel memorandum, correspondence, and court document, circa 1967Box 65Folder 6

Grand jury – challenges – court documents, 1966Box 65Folder 7

Grand jury – foreperson – court opinion regarding discrimination in foreperson selection,1981

Box 65Folder 8

Grand jury – general research – correspondence, articles, and notes, 1953-1979Box 65Folder 9

Grand jury – New York – correspondence and articles, 1953-1977Box 65Folder 10

Grand jury – petit jury comparison – data tables and notes, undatedBox 65Folder 11

Improper evidence – correspondence, law review article, and survey documents, circa1983-1984

Box 65Folder 12

Jury sentencing – article and memoranda, circa 1960sBox 65Folder 13

Jury sentencing – notes by state, undatedBox 66Folder 1

Jury waivers – counsels’ interview forms and questionnaires, circa 1954-1957Box 66Folder 2

Jury waivers – counsels’ interview forms and questionnaires, circa 1954-1957Box 66Folder 3

Jury waivers – counsels’ interview transcripts, 1954Box 66Folder 4

Jury waivers – memoranda and notes, 1953-1957Box 66Folder 5

Jury waivers – memoranda and notes, 1953-1957Box 66Folder 6

59

Joseph B. Kadane, “Juries Hearing Death Penalty Cases: Statistical Analysis of a LegalProcedure,” – technical report, photocopy, 1982

Box 66Folder 7

John H. Langbein, “Mixed Court and Jury Court: Evaluating the Continental Alternativeby American standards,” – typescript draft article, 1980

Box 66Folder 8

New Jersey juror interviews – data tables and sample summary forms, circa 1956-1960Box 66Folder 9

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Accuna – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 67Folder 1

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Alexander and Williams – interview forms andsummary, 1960

Box 67Folder 2

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Baldwin – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 67Folder 3

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Carey – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 67Folder 4

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Carter – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 67Folder 5

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Cobb and Porcher – interview forms, summary,memorandum, and notes, 1958

Box 67Folder 6

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Colon – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 67Folder 7

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Connor – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 67Folder 8

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Dixon – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 68Folder 1

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Duffy – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 68Folder 2

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Dumas – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 68Folder 3

60

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Fields – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 68Folder 4

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Foster, McClean, and Green – interview forms andsummary, 1959

Box 68Folder 5

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Gallagher – interview forms, summary, and notes,circa 1956-1960

Box 68Folder 6

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Govan, Govan, and Sherman – interview forms andsummary, 1956

Box 68Folder 7

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Green – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 68Folder 8

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Green and Ongue – interview forms and summary,1959

Box 68Folder 9

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Green and Ongue – interview forms and summary,1959

Box 69Folder 1

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Ho-Cutt – interview forms, summary, and notes,1958

Box 69Folder 2

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Hunter, Walker, Jackson, Howell, and Tomlinson –interview forms, summary, and memorandum, 1958

Box 69Folder 3

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Hynes – interview forms and summary, 1958Box 69Folder 4

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Irving – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 69Folder 5

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Jacobs – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 69Folder 6

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Jacobs – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 69Folder 7

61

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Johnson – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 69Folder 8

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Johnson – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 69Folder 9

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. King – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 70Folder 1

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Land – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 70Folder 2

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Lloyd – interview forms and code sheets, 1960Box 70Folder 3

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Lloyd – interview forms and code sheets, 1960Box 70Folder 4

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Marrone and Casole – interview forms andsummary, 1960

Box 70Folder 5

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Marrone and Casole – interview forms andsummary, 1960

Box 70Folder 6

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. McCloud – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 70Folder 7

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. McDonough – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 70Folder 8

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Kenneth and Robert Murray – interview forms,summary, and notes, circa 1956-1960

Box 71Folder 1

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Nixon and Maxwell – interview forms and summary,1960

Box 71Folder 2

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Nixon and Maxwell – interview forms and summary,1960

Box 71Folder 3

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Peres – interview forms, summary, and notes, 1959Box 71

62

Folder 4New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Pyatt – interview forms and summary, 1959

Box 71Folder 5

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Pyatt – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 71Folder 6

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Riccardi, Walsh, and Heerwagen – interview formsand summary, 1959

Box 71Folder 7

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Richards – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 71Folder 8

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Rizzo – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 71Folder 9

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Rizzo – interview forms, summary, notes, andclippings, 1958

Box 72Folder 1

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Rizzo – interview forms, summary, notes, andclippings, 1958

Box 72Folder 2

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Roselli – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 72Folder 3

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Russ – interview forms, 1959Box 72Folder 4

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Selph, Jones, and Sheppert – interview forms andsummary, 1959

Box 72Folder 5

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Selph, Jones, and Sheppert – interview forms andsummary, 1959

Box 72Folder 6

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Steiner – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 72Folder 7

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Sveda – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 72Folder 8

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Wanamaker – interview forms and summary, 1960

63

Box 72Folder 9

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Wanamaker – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 72Folder 10

New Jersey juror interviews – State v. Williams – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 73Folder 1

New Jersey juror interviews – questionnaires from assorted cases, 1958-1960Box 73Folder 2

“No Harmless Error; an Experiment,” – typescript draft, undatedBox 73Folder 3

Questionnaires and interview forms, circa 1950sBox 73Folder 4

Sequestration – “Should Juries be Sequestered?” – typescript draft and notes, circa 1960sBox 73Folder 5

Verdict expectations – questionnaires and memorandum, circa 1950sBox 73Folder 6

Voir dire – Canada – articles, 1984-1985

Subseries 3: Civil Jury Project

Box 73Folder 7

Automobile negligence – juror interview forms, 1960Box 73Folder 8

Building and repairs – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955Box 73Folder 9

Case description tables, undatedBox 73Folder 10

Case questionnaires and coding sheets, 1964Box 74Folder 1

Civil Jury Tables, Volume I – tables and notes, undatedBox 74Folder 2

Codebooks – Basic I – lists, undatedBox 74Folder 3

64

Codebooks – Basic II – lists, notes, and questionnaires, undatedBox 74Folder 4

Codebooks – coding sheets, memoranda, and notes, circa 1960-1968Box 74Folder 5

Codebooks – Damages – lists and notes, undatedBox 74Folder 6

Coding guides, undatedBox 74Folder 7

Coding guides, undatedBox 74Folder 8

Coding sheets – sample one, verdict code eight, undatedBox 75Folder 1

Coding sheets – sample one, verdict code four, undatedBox 75Folder 2

Coding sheets – sample one, verdict code four, undatedBox 75Folder 3

Coding sheets – sample one, verdict code nine, undatedBox 75Folder 4

Coding sheets – sample one, verdict code seven, undatedBox 75Folder 5

Coding sheets – sample one, verdict code three, undatedBox 75Folder 6

Coding sheets – sample one, verdict code three, undatedBox 75Folder 7

Coding sheets – sample one, verdict code zero, undatedBox 75Folder 8

Coding sheets – sample two, verdict code eight, undatedBox 75Folder 9

Coding sheets – sample two, verdict code four, undatedBox 76Folder 1

Coding sheets – sample two, verdict code four, undated

65

Box 76Folder 2

Coding sheets – sample two, verdict code nine, undatedBox 76Folder 3

Coding sheets – sample two, verdict code seven, undatedBox 76Folder 4

Coding sheets – sample two, verdict code three, undatedBox 76Folder 5

Coding sheets – sample two, verdict code zero, undatedBox 76Folder 6

Complex cases – articles and notes, 1979-1980Box 76Folder 7

Computer Basic data decks and notes, 1969Box 76Folder 8

Consumer sales – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955Box 76Folder 9

Consumer sales – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955Box 76Folder 10

Contract – questionnaires and notes, circa 1954-1955Box 76Folder 11

Contract – questionnaires and notes, circa 1954-1955Box 77Folder 1

Contributory negligence – typescript notes and charts, circa 1967Box 77Folder 2

Cook County Jury Verdict Reporter – trial summaries, 1964-1968Box 77Folder 3



Cook County Jury Verdict Reporter – trial lawyers’ indices and reports, 1964-1968Box 77

66

Folder 6Cook County – Klooster v. Chicago Surface Lines – trial record for appellate court, 1946

Box 77Folder 7

Cook County – Klooster v. Chicago Surface Lines – trial record for appellate court, 1946Box 77Folder 8

Cook County – Klooster v. Chicago Surface Lines – trial record for appellate court, 1946Box 78Folder 1

Cook County – Mustin v. Hinze – trial record for appellate court, 1953Box 78Folder 2



Correspondence, 1961-1988Box 78Folder 5

Correspondence and notes regarding Civil Jury Project funds, 1980Box 78Folder 6

Damages – correspondence, reports, and clippings, 1954-1967Box 78Folder 7

Damages – disagreements – memoranda and notes, 1965-1967Box 78Folder 8

Damages – punitive – sample juror questionnaires, undatedBox 78Folder 9

Shari Seidman Diamond – correspondence and articles regarding civil juries andmethodology, circa 1991

Box 78Folder 10

Dog bite – juror interview forms, 1959Box 78Folder 11

Dog bite – juror interview forms, 1959Box 79Folder 1

Employment – questionnaires and notes, 1953-1957Box 79

67

Folder 2Employment commission – questionnaires and notes, 1953-1956

Box 79Folder 3

“The Extent of the Civil Jury,” – typescript drafts and memorandum, circa 1963Box 79Folder 4

Family – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955Box 79Folder 5

Fraud – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955Box 79Folder 6

Gallup – unidentified typescript drafts, charts, and notes, undatedBox 79Folder 7

General research – article reprints and photocopies and newsletters, 1955-1985Box 79Folder 8

General research – article reprints and photocopies and newsletters, 1955-1985Box 79Folder 9

General research – articles, questionnaires, memos, clippings, and notes, circa 1953-1969Box 79Folder 10

General research – articles, questionnaires, memos, clippings, and notes, circa 1953-1969Box 79Folder 11

General research – case notes and excerpts from United States legal code, undatedBox 79Folder 12

Philip J. Hermann, “Predicting Verdicts in Personal Injury Cases,” – typescript report,circa 1960s

Box 80Folder 1

Hung juries/split verdicts – correspondence, questionnaires, research proposal, and charts,1979-1982

Box 80Folder 2

Illinois Constitutional Convention – correspondence and “Jury Trials in Civil Cases?” –typescript draft, 1970

Box 80Folder 3

Insurance – Iceberg – closing statement survey, 1958Box 80Folder 4

68

Insurance – Iceberg – correspondence, memoranda, and notes, circa 1957-1967Box 80Folder 5

Insurance – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1956Box 80Folder 6

Insurance binder – questionnaires, reports, and charts, circa 1955Box 80Folder 7

Insurance binder – questionnaires, reports, and charts, circa 1955Box 80Folder 8

Insurance companies – memoranda and notes regarding cooperation with the jury project,1953

Box 80Folder 9

Insurance companies advertising to jurors – correspondence, court documents, and printads, 1953

Box 80Folder 10

lists, circa 1970sBox 80Folder 11

Issues of law – handwritten notes and lists, undatedBox 81Folder 1

Judge-jury civil cases – Card I – instructions, questionnaires, and data, undatedBox 81Folder 2

Judges – questionnaires, report, and notes, circa 1964-1971Box 81Folder 3

Jury Project Civil Cases Open Deck and table of contents, 1960Box 81Folder 4

Jury requests – handwritten notes, undatedBox 81Folder 5

Landlord-tenant – questionnaires, memorandum, and notes, 1953-1966Box 81Folder 6

Richard Lempert – correspondence and computer data printouts, 1978-1981Box 81Folder 7

Limitations on fact finding – unidentified typescript drafts, undatedBox 81

69

Folder 8Loan contracts – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955

Box 81Folder 9

Jaro Mayda, “Lawyers’ Fees as an Element of Costs: A Comparative Study,” – typescriptdraft and related correspondence, 1958

Box 81Folder 10

Jaro Mayda, “Lawyers’ Fees as an Element of Costs: A Comparative Study,” – typescriptdraft and related correspondence, 1958

Box 82Folder 1

Memoranda, 1956-1967Box 82Folder 2

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Leslie L. Anderson, 1957Box 82Folder 3

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Irving R. Brand, 1957Box 82Folder 4

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Paul S. Carroll Jr., 1957Box 82Folder 5

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Dillon, 1957Box 82Folder 6

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Dillon, 1957Box 82Folder 7

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Erickson, 1957Box 82Folder 8

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Fossey, 1957Box 82Folder 9

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Paul J. Jaroscak, 1957Box 82Folder 10

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Theodore B. Knudson, 1957Box 83Folder 1

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge D.E. LaBelle, 1957Box 83Folder 2

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge D.E. LaBelle, 1957

70

Box 83Folder 3

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge William C. Larson, 1957Box 83Folder 4

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Earl J. Lyons, 1957Box 83Folder 5

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Harold N. Rogers, 1957Box 83Folder 6

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge Harold N. Rogers, 1957Box 83Folder 7

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge James Underhill, 1957Box 83Folder 8

Minnesota court transcripts – Judge John A. Weeks, 1957Box 84Folder 1

National Science Foundation grant proposal – NSF reports, project summaries, andcorrespondence, 1976-1980

Box 84Folder 2

Negligence – Coleman vs. Public Service – juror interview forms, circa 1960Box 84Folder 3

Negligence – “Cross-Tabulation on Imputed Negligence,” – typescript draft (photocopy),1965

Box 84Folder 4

Negligence – “Imputed Negligence,” – typescript draft and notes, circa 1968Box 84Folder 5

Negligence – Peer v. Thomas and Newark – juror interview forms, circa 1960Box 84Folder 6

Negligence – Rappaport v. Nichols – juror interview forms, circa 1960Box 84Folder 7

Negligence – Rappaport v. Nichols – juror interview forms, circa 1960Box 84Folder 8

Negligence – Saunders v. Melillo – juror interview forms, 1960Box 85Folder 1

71

Negligence – Saunders v. Melillo – juror interview forms, 1960Box 85Folder 2

Negotiable instruments – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1956Box 85Folder 3

New Jersey Judge Interviews – Connolly v. Fazzi – questionnaire, 1958Box 85Folder 4

New Jersey Judge Interviews – Drummond v. Greenberg – questionnaire, 1958Box 85Folder 5

New Jersey Judge Interviews – Rubin v. Claremont Diner Inc. – questionnaire, 1958Box 85Folder 6

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Brennan v. Consalvo – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 85Folder 7

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Clark v. Antholz – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 85Folder 8

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Clark v. Antholz – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 85Folder 9

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Feinsilver v. Davis – interview forms, 1959Box 85Folder 10

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Fishman v. Garcia – interview forms, 1958Box 86Folder 1

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Gadsen v. Highsmith – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 86Folder 2

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Gadsen v. Highsmith – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 86Folder 3

New Jersey Juror Interviews – ice removal case – interview forms, 1958Box 86Folder 4

New Jersey Juror Interviews – ice removal case – interview forms, 1958Box 86Folder 5

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Melchiore v. Pensault Co. – interview forms and summary,1960

Box 86Folder 6

72

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Melchiore v. Pensault Co. – interview forms and summary,1960

Box 86Folder 7

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Rose v. Clemente – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 86Folder 8

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Sheffield v. Daniels – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 87Folder 1

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Webb v. Fletcher – interview forms and summary, 1959Box 87Folder 2

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Wiercinski v. Pietrucha – interview forms and summary,1960

Box 87Folder 3

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Wiercinski v. Pietrucha – interview forms and summary,1960

Box 87Folder 4

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Williams v. Public Service Transport – interview forms andsummary, 1960

Box 87Folder 5

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Williams v. Public Service Transport – interview forms andsummary, 1960

Box 87Folder 6

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Williamson v. Stolfi – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 87Folder 7

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Willis v. Greenbaum – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 87Folder 8

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Willis v. Greenbaum – interview forms and summary, 1960Box 88Folder 1

New Jersey Juror Interviews – Zamelski v. Russakow – interview forms and summary,1959

Box 88Folder 2

No cause for action – juror interview forms, circa 1959Box 88Folder 3

Notes, circa 1953--1968

73

Box 88Folder 4

Notes, circa 1953--1968Box 88Folder 5

Notes, circa 1953--1968Box 88Folder 6

Precode deck – coding sheets and notes, undatedBox 88Folder 7

Professional services – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955Box 88Folder 8

Project data – correspondence, lists of variables, metadata, and notes, circa 1974-1982Box 88Folder 9

Project status reports, circa 1980sBox 89Folder 1

Questionnaires, circa 1954-1958Box 89Folder 2

Questionnaires for Personal Injury Cases, 1956-1959Box 89Folder 3

Questionnaires for Personal Injury Cases, 1956-1959Box 89Folder 4

Real estate – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955Box 89Folder 5

Reason coding sheets, undatedBox 89Folder 6



Reason coding sheets and correspondence, 1978Box 89Folder 9

Reason coding sheets, notes, and computer data printouts, 1973-1974Box 90

74

Folder 1Reason coding sheets, notes, and computer data printouts, 1973-1974

Box 90Folder 2

Reasons for disagreement – data and notes, undatedBox 90Folder 3

Research binder – reports, notes, and project data, 1955-1971Box 90Folder 4




Sales-buyer – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1955Box 90Folder 8

Sales-seller – questionnaires and notes, 1954-1956Box 90Folder 9

Settlement – interview forms, memoranda, and notes, circa 1953-1967Box 91Folder 1

Settlement – interview forms, memoranda, and notes, circa 1953-1967Box 91Folder 2

Shysterism – typescript reports, circa 1967Box 91Folder 3

Alice Marie Padawer Singer, Anchor Effects on Mean Judgments and Latitudes ofAcceptance under Varying Conditions of Involvement and Discrepancy – ColumbiaUniversity – dissertation photocopy, 1965

Box 91Folder 4

Split trials – Bailey v. Goodall – questionnaire, correspondence, data, and notes, 1968Box 91Folder 5

Split trials – Barry v. Belt Railway Company of Chicago – questionnaires and data, 1966Box 91Folder 6

Split trials – Beckman v. Norton Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965

75

Box 91Folder 7

Split trials – Bracken v. Varallo – questionnaires, data, and notes, circa 1966Box 91Folder 8

Split trials – Bustamente v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railway and Carborundum Co. –questionnaires, data, and notes, 1964

Box 91Folder 9

Split trials – Carpenter v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes,1965

Box 91Folder 10

Split trials – coding sheets, punch cards, and notes, circa 1961-1968Box 91Folder 11

Split trials – coding sheets, punch cards, and notes, circa 1961-1968Box 91Folder 12

Split trials – Coleman v. Drew – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965Box 91Folder 13

Split trials – Conroy v. McNamara Motor Express – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1963Box 91Folder 14

Split trials – correspondence, memoranda, and articles, 1959-1968Box 91Folder 15



Split trials – data, charts, and notes, circa 1961-1968Box 92Folder 3

Split trials – Demetrion v. Yellow Cab Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1968Box 92Folder 4

Split trials – Duke v. Stanford Fields – questionnaires, data, and notes, circa 1966Box 92Folder 5

Split trials – Dutton v. Kesier – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965Box 92Folder 6

76

Split trials – Eady v. Foerder – questionnaires, data, and notes, circa 1966Box 92Folder 7

Split trials – Gorick v. American Oil Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965Box 92Folder 8

Split trials – Guercio v. Olson Transportation Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1967Box 92Folder 9

Split trials – Halverson v. Campbell Soup Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965Box 92Folder 10

Split trials – Hockstein v. DiMaso – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1966Box 92Folder 11

Split trials – Hurd v. Ford – questionnaires, data, and notes, circa 1966Box 92Folder 12

Split trials – Irons v. Kelly – questionnaire and data, circa 1966Box 92Folder 13

Split trials – Jonaitis v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. – questionnaires, data, andnotes, 1965

Box 92Folder 14

Split trials – judges – correspondence, memoranda, instructions, and notes, 1963-1964Box 92Folder 15

Split trials – Kavanaugh v. Disney – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965Box 92Folder 16

Split trials – Keith v. Szkolka – questionnaires and data, 1966Box 92Folder 17

Split trials – Kiefel v. Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1967Box 92Folder 18

Split trials – Kilian v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad – questionnaires, data, and notes,circa 1966

Box 92Folder 19

Split trials – Kutinac v. Gateway Transportation Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes,1967

Box 92Folder 20

Split trials – LaSanka v. Sverdrup – questionnaires, data, and notes, circa 1966

77

Box 92Folder 21

Split trials – Lovelace v. Miller – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1966Box 92Folder 22

Split trials – Lytle v. CTA – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965Box 92Folder 23

Split trials – McCarthy v. Bracey – questionnaires, data, and notes, circa 1966Box 92Folder 24

Split trials – Miller v. Revell Oil Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1966Box 92Folder 25

Split trials – Moskal v. Kenney – questionnaires, data, and notes, circa 1966Box 92Folder 26

Split trials – Mulloy v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. – questionnaires, data, andnotes, circa 1967

Box 92Folder 27

Split trials – Neusus v. Sponholtz – questionnaires and data, 1965Box 92Folder 28

Split trials – O’Malley v. Carl – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1963Box 92Folder 29

Split trials – Paschal v. Terminal Transport Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1962Box 92Folder 30

Split trials – Perlman v. Hilton of Jamaica, Ltd. – questionnaires, data, and notes, circa1967

Box 93Folder 1

Split trials – Phillips v. Wolters – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1964Box 93Folder 2

Split trials – Pritzker v. McCormick – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1966Box 93Folder 3

Split trials – questionnaires, circa 1961-1968Box 93Folder 4

Split trials – Rubin v. Three Sisters Inc. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1967Box 93Folder 5

78

Split trials – Sabau v. Thompson – questionnaires and data, circa 1966Box 93Folder 6

Split trials – Schleffendorf v. CTA – questionnaire, data, and notes, circa 1966Box 93Folder 7

Split trials – Schroeder v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. – questionnaire, data, and notes, circa1967

Box 93Folder 8

Split trials – Schwandt v. Blendow – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1963Box 93Folder 9

Split trials – Sheehan v. Dennis – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965Box 93Folder 10

Split trials – Spicer v. Central Motor Lines – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1965Box 93Folder 11

Split trials – “Splitting Liability and Damage Issue Saves 20 Per Cent of the Court’sTime,” – summary of address by Zeisel, 1963

Box 93Folder 12

Split trials – Triffler v. Lawrence Trucking – questionnaires, correspondence, data, andnotes, 1967

Box 93Folder 13

Split trials – unidentified typescript drafts and handwritten notes, circa 1961-1968Box 93Folder 14

Split trials – Utterback v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railroad – questionnaires, data,and notes, 1965

Box 93Folder 15

Split trials – Van Hoosier v. Scot Lad Foods, Inc. – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1967Box 93Folder 16

Split trials – Vetter v. Economics Laboratory of Texas Inc. – questionnaires, data, andnotes, 1965

Box 93Folder 17

Split trials – Wallner v. Sara Lee – questionnaire, data, and notes, 1968Box 93Folder 18

Split trials – Washington v. Air Reduction Sales Co. – questionnaires, data, and notes,1964

79

Box 93Folder 19

Split trials – Williams v. Woodrow Bridges – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1968Box 93Folder 20

Split trials – Wilsmann v. Knueppel – questionnaires, data, and notes, 1963Box 93Folder 21

Split trials – Wilson v. Pennsylvania Railroad – questionnaires, correspondence, data, andnotes, 1965

Box 93Folder 22

Verdict/Award Expectation – coding sheets and case evaluation forms, circa 1970sBox 93Folder 23

Verdict/Award Expectation – correspondence, sample questionnaires, memoranda, andnotes, circa 1971-1977

Box 93Folder 24

Verdict/Award Expectation – data sheets, circa 1970sBox 94Folder 1

Verdict/Award Expectation – Expectation of Award in a Civil Case questionnaires, tables,and notes, circa 1970s

Box 94Folder 2

Verdict/Award Expectation – Expectation of Award in a Civil Case questionnaires, tables,and notes, circa 1970s

Box 94Folder 3

Verdict/Award Expectation – Trial and Verdict Expectation questionnaires, circa 1970sBox 94Folder 4

Verdict/Award Expectation – Trial and Verdict Expectation questionnaires, circa 1970sBox 94Folder 5

Workman’s compensation – questionnaires for civil jury trials, 1954-1955Box 94Folder 6

Workman’s compensation – questionnaires for personal injury cases, 1954-1959

Subseries 4: Death Penalty Projects

Box 94Folder 7

Alternative sentences – questionnaire, reports, and notes, 1986-1988Box 94

80

Folder 8Experiment notes, undated

Box 94Folder 9

Georgia – State v. Crawford – juror questionnaires, circa 1980sBox 95Folder 1

Grigsby v. Mabry – court opinion, 1983Box 95Folder 2

Juror questionnaires, undatedBox 95Folder 3

Legal Defense Fund – capital punishment study abstracts and bibliography, 1972Box 95Folder 4

Legal Defense Fund – correspondence, memoranda, and court opinion, 1971-1973Box 95Folder 5

Legal Defense Fund – correspondence, memoranda, and court opinion, 1971-1973Box 95Folder 6

Legal Defense Fund – death row statistics memoranda, 1991Box 95Folder 7

Miscellaneous project documents – correspondence, research, survey forms, and notes,circa 1964-1988

Box 95Folder 8

Oklahoma – State v. Ellis – court transcripts, 1987Box 96Folder 1

Oklahoma – State v. Ellis – court transcripts, 1987Box 96Folder 2

Oklahoma – State v. Fox and Fowler – court transcripts, 1986Box 96Folder 3

Oklahoma – State v. Fox and Fowler – court transcripts, 1986Box 96Folder 4

Oklahoma – State v. LaFevers and Cannon – court transcripts, 1986Box 96Folder 5

Oklahoma – State v. LaFevers and Cannon – court transcripts, 1986Box 96

81

Folder 6Oklahoma – State v. Moore – court transcripts, 1986

Box 96Folder 7

Oklahoma – State v. Moore – court transcripts, 1986Box 97Folder 1

Oklahoma – State v. Sellers – court transcripts, 1987Box 97Folder 2

Oklahoma – State v. Sellers – court transcripts, 1987Box 97Folder 3

“Research on the Death Penalty,” binder – draft reports, data, and analysis, 1987Box 97Folder 4

“Research on the Death Penalty,” binder – draft reports, data, and analysis, 1987Box 97Folder 5

Judge Milton Shadur – correspondence and court documents regarding capital trial, 1991Box 97Folder 6

Study of Juror Views on Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Without Parole – 003-013,1989

Box 97Folder 7


Box 98Folder 1


Box 98Folder 2


Box 98Folder 3


Box 98Folder 4


Box 98Folder 5

82


Box 98Folder 6


Box 98Folder 7


Box 99Folder 1


Box 99Folder 2


Box 99Folder 3


Box 99Folder 4


Box 99Folder 5


Box 99Folder 6


Box 99Folder 7


Box 100Folder 1


Box 100Folder 2


83

Box 100Folder 3


Box 100Folder 4


Box 100Folder 5


Box 100Folder 6


Box 100Folder 7


Box 101Folder 1


Box 101Folder 2


Box 101Folder 3


Box 101Folder 4


Box 101Folder 5

Views on death penalty – juror questionnaires, undatedBox 101Folder 6

Views on death penalty – data tables, undatedBox 101Folder 7

Voir dire distinguishers – correspondence and memoranda, circa 1985Box 101

84

Folder 8Voting for death penalty – reports, data, and notes, circa 1986

Subseries 5: Other Projects

Box 101Folder 9

Arbitration Study binder – memorandum, coding sheets, and questionnaires, circa 1954Box 101Folder 10

Arbitration Study – project reports and arbitration statements, 1947-1972Box 101Folder 11



Automobile accidents – causes – study proposals and outlines, circa 1953-1954Box 102Folder 2

Automobile accidents – Connecticut – correspondence and registration records,1953-1954

Box 102Folder 3

Automobile accidents – correspondence, surveys, memoranda, and notes, 1953-1959Box 102Folder 4

Automobile accidents – highway safety and seat belts – correspondence, articles, andresearch reports, 1985-1986

Box 102Folder 5

Automobile accidents – proposal for international study of tort law, undatedBox 102Folder 6

Chotei study (Japan) – lay judges – correspondence and study outline, 1964Box 102Folder 7

Court delay – abolishment of the jury – memoranda, circa 1952Box 102Folder 8

Court delay – arbitration – report and clippings, circa 1963Box 102Folder 9

Court delay – claims consciousness – memorandum, clippings, and notes, 1953-1962Box 102

85

Folder 10Court delay – correspondence, articles, and reports, 1959-1990

Box 102Folder 11

Court delay – court congestion – reports, correspondence, and data, 1958-1967Box 102Folder 12

Court delay – definition and measurement – memoranda and graphs, undatedBox 102Folder 13

Dunham/Intestate Inheritance Project – correspondence, proposal, questionnaires, andnotecards, circa 1961-1970

Box 103Folder 1

Federal Judicial Center Advisory Committee on Experimentation in the Law –memoranda on methodology, 1978

Box 103Folder 2

Finder’s Fee Project – correspondence, questionnaire, and clipping, 1954Box 103Folder 3

Grant funding guideline booklets, 1990-1991Box 103Folder 4

Home Office Research Unit (England) – research program summaries, 1967Box 103Folder 5

Impartial medical experts – correspondence, articles, and reports, 1956-1968Box 103Folder 6

Impartial medical experts – correspondence, articles, and reports, 1956-1968Box 103Folder 7

Judicial bias – personal injury trials – data sheets, undatedBox 103Folder 8

Legal exhibition/Museum of Justice – death penalty exhibition – drawings, circa1957-1961

Box 103Folder 9

Legal exhibition/Museum of Justice – proposals, circa 1950sBox 103Folder 10

Legal exhibition/Museum of Justice – tax exhibition – drawings, reports, and clippings,circa 1957-1961

Box 103

86

Folder 11Medical malpractice project – correspondence, meeting minutes and agendas, 1984-1986

Box 103Folder 12

Miscellaneous projects – proposals, articles, and notes, 1952-1988Box 104Folder 1

Miscellaneous projects – proposals, articles, and notes, 1952-1988Box 104Folder 2

Police Foundation experiments – correspondence and reports, 1974-1988Box 104Folder 3

Police Foundation experiments – correspondence and reports, 1974-1988Box 104Folder 4

Pre-trial Conference Project – correspondence, report, and notes, 1977Box 104Folder 5

Sense of Justice – typescript draft reports, questionnaires, and notes, circa 1953-1955Box 104Folder 6

Taxation Project binder – memoranda and questionnaires, 1954Box 104Folder 7

Taxation Project binder – memoranda and questionnaires, 1954Box 104Folder 8

Taxation Project – James S. Henry, “Noncompliance with U.S. Tax Law,” draft of articlepublished in The Tax Lawyer, circa 1983

Box 104Folder 9

Taxation Project – memoranda and questionnaire, 1954Box 105Folder 1

Taxation Project – memoranda and questionnaire, 1954Box 105Folder 2

Taxation Project – notecards and interview schedule, circa 1950sBox 105Folder 3

Usable research mailing lists, undatedBox 105Folder 4

Vera Institute of Justice – burglary case summary forms, circa 1970sBox 105

87

Folder 5Vera Institute of Justice – burglary case summary forms, circa 1970s

Box 105Folder 6

Vera Institute of Justice – coding dictionary and correspondence regarding case tapes,1974-1976

Box 105Folder 7

Vera Institute of Justice – photocopy draft chapters regarding felonies, circa 1970sBox 105Folder 8

Vision Quest – correspondence and study report, 1979-1983

Series VII: Writings

This series is divided into six subseries: General Writings; Books; Articles; Speeches andConference Papers; Testimony and Reports; and Criticism. All subseries are arrangedchronologically, except for Subseries Two which is arranged alphabetically by book title.

Subseries One contains Zeisel’s bibliographies; drafts of his unpublished memoirs; his newspapercolumns and letters to the editor; and other small, unpublished pieces concerning a variety oftopics.

Subseries Two contains drafts and research related to several of Zeisel’s books, including thenever-published culmination of the University of Chicago’s Civil Jury Project, The AmericanCivil Jury, as well as the posthumously published Prove It With Figures (1997) co-authored withDavid Kaye.

Subseries Three contains reprints and drafts of Zeisel’s scholarly articles, along with relatedresearch and correspondence. This subseries also includes Zeisel’s April 8, 1961 piece in TheSaturday Review entitled “Who are the Guilty?” that concerned the trial of former Nazi officerAdolf Eichmann, along with related correspondence and clippings.

Subseries Four contains drafts, notes, and research concerning Zeisel’s many speakingengagements covering a wide range of topics.

Subseries Five contains drafts of Zeisel’s testimony regarding criminal law before governmentcommittees as well as related memoranda.

Subseries Six contains book reviews and other criticism authored by Zeisel.

Subseries 1: General Writings

Box 105Folder 9

The American jury – typescript notes and clippings, circa 1985-1987Box 105

88

Folder 10Bibliographies, 1986-1991

Box 105Folder 11

“Catherine the Great on Law Making and Public Opinion Research,” – typescript draft,undated

Box 105Folder 12

Foreword, Judging the Jury by V.P. Hans and N. Vidmar – typescript draft andphotocopy, 1986

Box 105Folder 13

General notes, circa 1967Box 105Folder 14

Letters to the editor, 1950-1989Box 105Folder 15

“The Other Austria,” – typescript draft and clippings, circa 1987Box 105Folder 16

Research proposals, circa 1952-1985Box 106Folder 1

Research proposals, circa 1952-1985Box 106Folder 2

“Shoah,” – typescript draft, undatedBox 106Folder 3

Trademark confusion and survey notes, undatedBox 106Folder 4

Translations – German writings and handwritten notes, circa 1970sBox 106Folder 5

“Wagner’s Gotterdammerung from Close Up,” – typescript draft, 1990Box 106Folder 6

“Finders-Keepers,” – typescript draft with handwritten comments, undatedBox 106Folder 7

“A Method for Reducing Auto Theft,” – photocopies, undatedBox 106Folder 8

“Note on Point Rationing,” – typescript draft, undated

89

Box 106Folder 9

“On Comparing the Causes of Death,” – typescript draft, undatedBox 106Folder 10

“On the Gradual Formation of our Thoughts through Talking,” – typescript draft withhandwritten comments, undated

Box 106Folder 11

“Russia and the United States,” – typescript draft, undatedBox 106Folder 12

Unidentified drafts, undatedBox 106Folder 13

Untitled piece on presidential leadership – typescript draft, undatedBox 106Folder 14

“The Wrong Atomic Target: Not Energy but the Bomb,” – typescript draft, undatedBox 106Folder 15

Zeisel memoirs – typescript draft sections, undated

Subseries 2: Books

Box 106Folder 16

The American Civil Jury – fragments of typescript and manuscript drafts, undatedBox 106Folder 17

The American Civil Jury – Introduction, chapters 1, 3-5, and 8 – typescript drafts,undated

Box 106Folder 18

The American Civil Jury – Judges and Juries – typescript drafts, undatedBox 106Folder 19

The American Civil Jury – Negligence – typescript drafts, undatedBox 106Folder 20

The American Civil Jury – notes, undatedBox 107Folder 1

The American Civil Jury – notes, undatedBox 107Folder 2

The American Civil Jury – notes, undated

90

Box 107Folder 3

The American Civil Jury – “Regional Variations in Jury Awards,” – typescript draft andnotes, circa 1950s/1960s

Box 107Folder 4

The American Jury – 25th anniversary – typescript draft article and correspondence,1990-1991

Box 107Folder 5

The American Jury – “The American Jury: Notes for an English Controversy,” TheRoundtable – airmail edition, 1967

Box 107Folder 6

The American Jury – annotated copy, 1966Box 107Folder 7



The American Jury – book jackets, 1966Box 108Folder 1

The American Jury – chapters 1 and 4 – typescript draft, circa 1960sBox 108Folder 2

The American Jury – chapters 6 and 7 – typescript draft, circa 1960sBox 108Folder 3

The American Jury – citations in cases, briefs – correspondence, articles, and courtdocuments, 1967-1971

Box 108Folder 4

The American Jury – preface to the Phoenix edition – photocopies, 1971Box 108Folder 5

The American Jury – “Reconstructed Deliberations: Zirklebaugh et al., v. Decatur CartageCo., Inc.” – typescript draft, circa 1960s

Box 108Folder 6

The American Jury – book reviews, 1966-1968Box 108Folder 7

91



The American Jury – book reviews, circa 1972-1976Box 109Folder 1

Delay in the Court – book jacket, 1959Box 109Folder 2

Delay in the Court – book reviews, 1959-1961Box 109Folder 3



Delay in the Court – Chapter 13, “Pre-trial,” – photocopy, 1959Box 109Folder 6

Delay in the Court – clippings, 1959-1960Box 109Folder 7

Delay in the Court – foreword to the second edition, photocopy, 1978Box 109Folder 8

Delay in the Court – notes and correspondence, circa 1956-1958Box 109Folder 9

Delay in the Court – related articles, 1959-1969Box 109Folder 10

Delay in the Court – related articles, 1959-1969Box 110Folder 1

The Limits of Law Enforcement – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1980-1986Box 110Folder 2


The Limits of Law Enforcement – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1980-1986

92

Box 110Folder 4


The Limits of Law Enforcement – book reviews, 1983-1986Box 110Folder 6

The Limits of Law Enforcement – clippings, 1976-1985Box 110Folder 7

The Limits of Law Enforcement – graphs, undatedBox 111Folder 1

The Limits of Law Enforcement – juvenile justice reports, 1981Box 111Folder 2

The Limits of Law Enforcement – typescript draft table of contents and photocopiedexcerpts, circa 1983

Box 111Folder 3

The Limits of Law Enforcement – typescript first draft chapters, 1975Box 111Folder 4



Marienthal – afterword, lecture, and article, 1974-1991Box 111Folder 7

Marienthal – research and review articles, 1961-1983Box 111Folder 8

Prove It With Figures – book proposal, circa 1980sBox 111Folder 9

Prove It With Figures – Introduction and Chapter 1, “The Search for Causes,” – typescriptdrafts and correspondence, circa 1982-1991

Box 111Folder 10

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 2, “The Controlled Randomized Experiment,” –typescript draft copies and notes, 1991

Box 112

93

Folder 1Prove It With Figures – chapter 2 – early typescript drafts and notes, 1980

Box 112Folder 2

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 3, “Observational Studies,” – typescript and manuscriptdraft, 1991

Box 112Folder 3

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 4, “Triangulation,” – typescript draft copies and relatedresearch, circa 1990-1991 (final chapter 5)

Box 112Folder 4

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 5, “Indices,” – typescript draft, 1991Box 112Folder 5

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 7, “Sampling,” – typescript drafts, 1991Box 112Folder 6

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 8B/14, “Change of Venue,” – typescript drafts, 1991(final chapter 9)

Box 112Folder 7

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 8B/14, “Change of Venue,” – typescript drafts, 1991(final chapter 9)

Box 112Folder 8

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 8C, “Trademark Genericness,” – typescript draft, 1991(final chapter 10)

Box 112Folder 9

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 8D, “Confusion Surveys,” – typescript draft copies andcorrespondence, 1991 (final chapter 11)

Box 112Folder 10

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 13, “Content Analysis,” – typescript draft, articles, andnotes, 1968-1991 (final chapter 8)

Box 112Folder 11

Prove It With Figures – Chapter 13, “The Jury,” – typescript draft with Hille’s proposedcorrections, 1991 (final chapter 12)

Box 112Folder 12

Prove It With Figures – chapter on correlation – typescript drafts, court decisions, andnotes, circa 1991

Box 113Folder 1

94

Prove It With Figures – Economics – typescript drafts, circa 1987Box 113Folder 2

Prove It With Figures – Epidemiological studies – typescript draft section and notes, circa1991

Box 113Folder 3

Prove It With Figures – Half-a-loaf experiment – typescript and manuscript drafts andfragments and notes, circa 1978-1991

Box 113Folder 4

Prove It With Figures – Half-a-loaf experiment – typescript and manuscript drafts andfragments and notes, circa 1978-1991

Box 113Folder 5

Prove It With Figures – David Kaye – correspondence, curriculum vitae, newsletter,1987-1991

Box 113Folder 6

Prove It With Figures – typescript and manuscript notes, circa 1991Box 113Folder 7

Prove It With Figures – typescript and manuscript notes, circa 1991Box 113Folder 8

Prove It With Figures – Plea Bargaining – typescript drafts, circa 1980sBox 113Folder 9

Prove It With Figures – Preponderance – typescript draft section and article, circa1983-1991

Box 113Folder 10

Prove It With Figures – Research – age discrimination –correspondence and courtopinion, 1980, 1986

Box 114Folder 1

Prove It With Figures – Research – change of venue – articles, court documents, andnotes, circa 1953-1985

Box 114Folder 2


Box 114Folder 3


95

Box 114Folder 4


Box 114Folder 5

Prove It With Figures – Research – confusion surveys – articles, surveys, and notes,1963-1991

Box 114Folder 6


Box 114Folder 7


Box 114Folder 8


Box 115Folder 1

Prove It With Figures – Research – epidemiological studies – articles and notes,1974-1988

Box 115Folder 2

Prove It With Figures – Research – forecasting and prediction – articles and notes,1979-1985

Box 115Folder 3

Prove It With Figures – Research – general – articles, circa 1977-1987Box 115Folder 4

Prove It With Figures – Research – general – articles, circa 1977-1987Box 115Folder 5

Prove It With Figures – Research – genericness – articles, memoranda, and notes, circa1983-1988

Box 115Folder 6

Prove It With Figures – Research – genericness – articles, memoranda, and notes, circa1983-1988

Box 115Folder 7

Prove It With Figures – Research – Half-a-loaf experiment – articles and correspondence,1967-1980

96

Box 115Folder 8

Prove It With Figures – Research – Half-a-loaf experiment – articles and correspondence,1967-1980

Box 116Folder 1

Prove It With Figures – Research – introduction and history – articles and notes, circa1980s

Box 116Folder 2

Prove It With Figures – Research – observational studies – articles and notes, circa1963-1990

Box 116Folder 3

Prove It With Figures – Research – observational studies – articles and notes, circa1963-1990

Box 116Folder 4

Prove It With Figures – Research – race discrimination – articles, 1965-1983,Box 116Folder 5

Prove It With Figures – Research – regression – articles and notes, 1978-1990Box 116Folder 6

Prove It With Figures – Research – regression – articles and notes, 1978-1990Box 116Folder 7

Prove It With Figures – Research – risk analysis – articles, 1983-1989Box 117Folder 1

Prove It With Figures – Research – risk analysis – articles, 1983-1989Box 117Folder 2

Prove It With Figures – Research – the search for causes – articles and notes, circa1976-1986

Box 117Folder 3

Prove It With Figures – Research – the search for causes – articles and notes, circa1976-1986

Box 117Folder 4

Prove It With Figures – Research – social science and law – articles, 1985-1988Box 117Folder 5

Prove It With Figures – Research – triangulation – court documents, circa 1980sBox 117

97

Folder 6Prove It With Figures – Research – triangulation – court documents, circa 1980s

Box 117Folder 7

Say It With Figures – book jacket, fourth edition, 1957Box 117Folder 8

Say It With Figures – correspondence, 1987-1990Box 117Folder 9

Say It With Figures – indices – related articles and chapters, circa 1971-1988Box 117Folder 10

Say It With Figures – notes and clippings, 1981-1987Box 118Folder 1

Say It With Figures – reviews, 1947-1989Box 118Folder 2

Say It With Figures – typescript draft of sixth edition with handwritten comments, 1984Box 118Folder 3

Say It With Figures – typescript draft of sixth edition with handwritten comments, 1984Box 118Folder 4

Say It With Figures – typescript draft of sixth edition with handwritten comments, 1984

Subseries 3: Articles

Box 118Folder 5

German articles – reprints, photocopies, and typescript drafts, circa 1931-1985Box 118Folder 6

Article reprints, 1943-1960Box 118Folder 7

“The Uniqueness of Survey Evidence,” Cornell Law Review – reprints and related teachingmaterials, 1960

Box 119Folder 1

“Who are the Guilty?” The Saturday Review – letter to the editor, correspondence, andclippings, 1960-1987

Box 119Folder 2

“Who are the Guilty?” The Saturday Review – letter to the editor, correspondence, andclippings, 1960-1987

98

Box 119Folder 3


“The Castration of Adam,” – typescript draft, correspondence, articles, and clippings, circa1964-1976

Box 119Folder 5

“Essential Disclosure in Consumer Credit Contracts,” co-authored with Paul Boschan –typescript draft, 1967

Box 119Folder 6

“The Law,” The Uses of Sociology, -- article reprints and related article and typescriptdraft, circa 1967

Box 119Folder 7

“In Defense of Romeo and Juliet,” – reprints, typescript draft, and notes, 1967-1968Box 119Folder 8

“In Defense of Romeo and Juliet,” – research and correspondence, 1954-1989Box 119Folder 9

“Dr. Spock and the Case of the Vanishing Women Jurors,” – article reprint and research,1968-1969

Box 120Folder 1

Article reprints, 1969Box 120Folder 2

“Power and Limits of the Indirect Experiment,” – typescript draft and evaluativecommentary, 1969

Box 120Folder 3

“The Supreme Court of the United States: 1969,” – typescript draft, 1969Box 120Folder 4




99

“The Bail System Revisited,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal – typescript andhandwritten draft, and book review, 1973-1977

Box 120Folder 8


“Once More: Six vs. Twelve-Member Juries,” co-authored with Shari Seidman Diamond –typescript drafts, evaluative commentary, and clippings, 1977-1978

Box 121Folder 1


“Lawmaking and Public Opinion Research: The President and Patrick Caddell,” AmericanBar Foundation Research Journal – article reprint and clippings, 1980-1985

Box 121Folder 3

“Statistics in a Court of Law,” Design, Data, and Analysis, C.L. Mallow, ed. – photocopy,correspondence, and articles, 1980-1986

Box 121Folder 4

“The Jury” – encyclopedia article -- typescript drafts and correspondence, 1981Box 121Folder 5

“Harry Kalven Jr.,” The Law School Record, The University of Chicago, 1983Box 121Folder 6

“Jury Behavior,” Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, co-authored with Shari Diamond –galley proof, 1983

Box 121Folder 7

“‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’ Court Decisions,” – typescript draft copies, articles, and clippings,circa 1985

Box 121Folder 8

“Two Decades of No-Nonsense Law Enforcement,” – typescript drafts and notes, 1986Box 121Folder 9

“We Tried Stricter Law Enforcement and Failed to Reduce Crime. What Now?” –typescript draft, 1986

Box 121Folder 10

“The Witherspoon Jurors that Never Were,” – typescript draft fragment, correspondence,and research, 1986

Box 121

100

Folder 11“What Makes Appeal Judges Disagree with Each Other?” –typescript drafts, circa 1986

Box 122Folder 1

“What Makes Appeal Judges Disagree with Each Other?” – court opinions and articles,1967-1986

Box 122Folder 2

Market research articles co-authored with David Kaserman and related research –unpublished typescript drafts, 1986-1989

Box 122Folder 3

“Society, too, must shoulder responsibility for crime,” Chicago Tribune, -- typescript draft,correspondence, and research, 1987

Box 122Folder 4

Karl Polanyi – articles and symposium documents, circa 1987-1990Box 122Folder 5

“Market Definition: Implementing the Department of Justice Merger Guidelines,”The Antitrust Bulletin, co-authored with David L. Kaserman – typescript draft andcorrespondence, 1989-1991

Box 122Folder 6

Newspaper columns, 1990Box 122Folder 7

“Death and Resurrection of the Spirit of Witherspoon,” – typescript drafts and fragments,circa 1991

Box 122Folder 8

“Death and Resurrection of the Spirit of Witherspoon,” – typescript drafts and fragments,circa 1991

Box 122Folder 9

“Death and Resurrection of the Spirit of Witherspoon,” – correspondence, notes, and voirdire summary data, circa 1991-1992

Box 122Folder 10

“Abortion is Murder,” – typescript draft, undatedBox 122Folder 11

Article reprints, undatedBox 122Folder 12

“Blue Ribbon Jury in New York,” – typescript draft, undated

101

Box 123Folder 1

“Death Penalty Sentiment in the United States,” co-authored with Alex M. Gallup –typescript draft, undated

Subseries 4: Speeches and Conference Papers

Box 123Folder 2

Speeches – Paul F. Lazarsfeld/Socialism – typescript draft, correspondence, articles, andnotes, 1949-1991

Box 123Folder 3

Speeches, 1950-1959Box 123Folder 4


Judicial decisions – convention paper, reports, and articles, 1963-1989Box 123Folder 6

Judicial decisions – convention paper, reports, and articles, 1963-1989Box 123Folder 7




“The Secret of the San Diego Police and Related Secrets,” – conference paper,correspondence, and notes, 1975-1980

Box 124Folder 4


Speeches – FBI – articles and notes, 1979Box 124Folder 6


102


Chart/Graph Lecture – correspondence, notes, and clippings, circa 1987-1989Box 124Folder 9

Speeches – Rudolph Carnap – articles, correspondence, and notes, 1989-1991Box 125Folder 1

Speeches – Rudolph Carnap – Carnap correspondence, photocopies, 1945-1970Box 125Folder 2



“Sehr geehrter Herr Vorsitzender, Meine Damen und Herren,” – typescript draft(photocopy), 1991

Box 125Folder 5

Speeches, undatedBox 125Folder 6




Speeches, undated

Subseries 5: Reports and Testimony

Box 126Folder 3

“Some Insights into the Operation of Criminal Juries,” – typescript draft reports, 1957Box 126Folder 4

Court administration – Senate Judiciary Committee – Zeisel testimony and related issue ofCongressional Record, 1967

Box 126Folder 5

103

Federal jury selection – Senate Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery –hearing transcript, 1967

Box 126Folder 6

Bureau of Standards Report on Pretrial Release – Senate Subcommittee on theConstitution – Zeisel testimony, memoranda, and notes, 1970

Box 126Folder 7

Bureau of Standards Report on Pretrial Release– Senate Subcommittee on theConstitution – Zeisel testimony, memoranda, and notes, 1970

Box 126Folder 8

Six-member juries – Zeisel testimony and memorandum, 1974Box 126Folder 9

Alabama v. Th. Whisenhant – dictation of Zeisel testimony, 1977Box 126Folder 10

Rational Criteria for the Imposition of Capital Punishment – Senate Judiciary Committee– hearing transcripts, 1978

Box 126Folder 11

“Beyond Law Enforcement,” Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority – typescriptdraft, correspondence, and newsletter, 1984-1985

Box 126Folder 12

“A Note on Juries and Tribunals of Judges; Apropos our Recent Round Table Discussion,”memorandum, 1987

Subseries 6: Criticism

Box 126Folder 13

Book reviews, 1950-1983Box 127Folder 1

“Comment on ‘Prevention and Control of Crime and Delinquency’: a report preparedby the Gen-Space Corporation for the Correction Agency of the State of California,” –typescript critique, undated

Box 127Folder 2

“A Note on Good, Tullock—and Laplace,” – typescript drafts, correspondence, andresearch, 1984-1985

Box 127Folder 3

“A Letter Never Sent to James Boyd White,” – typescript drafts, undatedBox 127

104

Folder 4“Notes on ‘Changes in the Criminal Behavior of Heroin Addicts,’” – typescript draft,undated

Box 127Folder 5

“The Tin Drum by Gunther Grass,” – typescript copies, undated

Series VIII: Writings by Others

This series includes typescript drafts of writings authored by Zeisel’s colleagues, as well as relatedcorrespondence and research materials. In particular, this series contains drafts of the Germanpoetry anthology that Zeisel engaged translator Max Knight to assemble, along with theircorrespondence concerning the project. Zeisel sought to encourage the spread of German poetryin the United States, especially among Americans of German ancestry, and felt an anthologythat included both German and English versions of popular German poems would help thatendeavor. Ultimately, however, the anthology was never published.

Box 127Folder 6

Donald T. Campbell, “Reforms as Experiments,” – typescript draft, 1968 (photocopy)Box 127Folder 7

James S. Coleman, “Autobiographical Sketch: II,” – typescript draft, 1985Box 127Folder 8

Shari Seidman Diamond, “Problems of Method in the Empirical Study of Law,” –typescript draft, 1982

Box 127Folder 9

Ladislas Farago, “Trial for Murder,” – typescript draft, undatedBox 127Folder 10

German poetry project – correspondence and research, 1987-1990Box 127Folder 11

German poetry project – Max Knight – correspondence and draft translations, 1958-1991Box 127Folder 12



German poetry project – Max Knight – typescript drafts of anthology, 1987Box 128Folder 3

105





German poetry project – Louis Macneice, Goethe’s Faust, Parts I and II – annotated copy,1958

Box 128Folder 8

Jamie Kalven – A Worthy Tradition – correspondence, speech, and review, 1988Box 129Folder 1

David Kaye – articles – typescript drafts and reprints, circa 1985-1986Box 129Folder 2

David Kaye, chapters on Bayes’ Rule – typescript drafts, undatedBox 129Folder 3

David Kaye, chapters on probability, evidence, and jury selection – typescript drafts, circa1985-1990

Box 129Folder 4

David Kaye, chapters on probability and jury selection – typescript drafts, 1990Box 129Folder 5

David Kaye, Probability and Statistics for Lawyers, chapters 1-7, 13, 14, 16 – typescriptdrafts, circa 1980

Box 129Folder 6

David Kaye, Probability and Statistics for Lawyers, chapters 2, 15 – typescript drafts, circa1980

Box 129Folder 7

Gary D. LaFree, Barbara F. Reskin, and Christy A. Visher, “Jurors’ Responses toLegal Issues and Victims’ Behavior in Sexual Assault Trials,” – typescript draft andcorrespondence, 1983-1984 (photocopies)

Series IX: Audiovisual

106

This series contains cassette tapes, VHS tapes, audio and videotape reels, and photographs.The cassettes and VHS tapes primarily contain recordings related to Zeisel’s role as a litigationconsultant for various companies facing lawsuits, such as recordings of mock trials. Somecassettes include recordings of Zeisel’s academic lectures and debates. The audiotape reelsconcern the University of Chicago Law School’s Jury Project, and the photographs includeimages of Zeisel and his family members, as well as images used in his consulting work.

Box 129Folder 8

Photographs – exhibit book, undatedBox 129Folder 9

Photographs – Zeisel and Family, undatedBox 130

Cassette Tape – Sides A & B: “Capital Punishment Debate,” – University of Chicago Pro-Life Association and University of Chicago Debating Society, October 30, 1984 [1/2]

Box 130Cassette Tape – Sides A & B: “Capital Punishment Debate,” – University of Chicago Pro-Life Association and University of Chicago Debating Society, October 30, 1984 [2/2]

Box 130Cassette Tape – Tylenol Interviews – Survey Center, Chicago, October 6, 1989 [1/2]

Box 130Cassette Tape – Tylenol Interviews – Survey Center, Chicago, October 6, 1989 [2/2]

Box 130Cassette Tape – “In re Ask Jury Deliberation A, Part 1,” – Santa Clara, CA, March 31,1990

Box 130Cassette Tape – “In re Ask Jury Deliberation A, Part 2,” – Santa Clara, CA, March 31,1990

Box 130Cassette Tape – “In re Ask Jury Deliberation B,” – Santa Clara, CA, March 31, 1990

Box 130Cassette Tape – In re Ask – Santa Clara, CA, March 31, 1990 [1/2]

Box 130Cassette Tape – In re Ask – Santa Clara, CA, March 31, 1990 [2/2]

Box 130Cassette Tape – “WBEZ surveys and polls,” March 14, 1991

Box 130Cassette Tape – “The Deterrent Effect of the Death Penalty,” by Hans Zeisel and MiltonRosenberg, undated

Box 130Cassette Tape – Sides 1 & 2: “Hans,” undated

Box 130Cassette Tape – Sides 1 & 2: “Information Updates – D. Bruck, H. Zeisel, C. Palmer,”undated

Box 130

107

Cassette Tape – Side 1: Milt Rosenberg with Zeisel, undatedBox 130

Cassette Tape – Sides 1 & 2: “Vortrag Prof. Zeisel,” undatedBox 130

Cassette Tape – Side 1: Zeisel I & II (not complete). Side 2: Zeisel II (continued) and IIIand IV (not complete), undated

Box 130Cassette Tape – Side 1: Zeisel IV (continued) and V. Side 1 only, undated.

Box 130Cassette Tape – Sides 1 & 2: “Zeisel remarks at the Harvard Center for European StudiesConference on Austrian Social Democracy,” undated

Box 130Cassette Tape – contents unknown, undated

Box 130Cassette Tape – contents unknown, undated

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “McCann-Erickson New York Stakeholders’ Composite,” March,1987

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – Pillsbury v. National Fire Insurance – Carl Smith – David ForsbergAttorney, April 29, 1987 [1/4]

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – Pillsbury v. National Fire Insurance – Carl Smith – David ForsbergAttorney, April 29, 1987 [2/4]

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – Pillsbury v. National Fire Insurance – Carl Smith – David ForsbergAttorney, May 2, 1987 [3/4]

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – Pillsbury v. National Fire Insurance – Carl Smith – David ForsbergAttorney, May 2, 1987 [4/4]

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “AM Deliberation, Mock Jury Chicago – Room A,” January 9, 1988

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “AM Deliberation – Room B,” January 9, 1988

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “Chicago AM Deliberation, Mock Trial – Room A,” January 9,1988

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “Chicago AM Deliberation, Mock Trial – Room B,” January 9,1988

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “Chicago PM Deliberation, Mock Trial – Room A,” January 9,1988

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “Chicago PM Deliberation, Mock Trial/Sam Trial,” – Room B,January 9, 1988

108

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “Chicago AM Presentation,” January 9, 1988 [1/2]

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “Chicago AM Presentation,” January 9, 1988 [2/2]

Box 131VHS Cassette Tape – “Chicago PM Presentation, Mock Trial,” January 9, 1988 [1/2]

Box 131Folder 1

Sam Mock Trial – Chicago – tape list and jury vote tabulations, 1988Box 132

VHS Cassette Tape – “Chicago PM Presentation, Mock Trial,” January 9, 1988 [2/2]Box 132

VHS Cassette Tape – MCI Competitive: AT&T Retention Campaign (with supers)– “Man at Station,” August 13, 1989; “Woman at Office,” August 11, 1989; “Man atHome,” August 11, 1989.

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – In re Ask – “Jury Deliberation A, Part 1,” Santa Clara, CA, March31, 1990

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – In re Ask – “Jury Deliberation A, Part 2,” Santa Clara, CA, March31, 1990

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – In re Ask – “Jury Deliberation B,” Santa Clara, CA, March 31, 1990

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – “Tylenol – Theresa,” September 25, 1989 [1/2]

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – “Tylenol – Theresa,” September 25, 1989 [2/2]

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – “Deliberation, Group 2,” September 22, 1990 [1/2]

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – “Deliberation, Group 2,” September 22, 1990 [2/2]

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – “Deliberation, Group F,” September 22, 1990

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – “Deliberation, Group I,” September 22, 1990

Box 132VHS Cassette Tape – “Testimony, 9:30 am,” September 22, 1990 [1/2]

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – “Testimony, 9:30 am,” September 22, 1990 [2/2]

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – “Trial Questions & Answer Time; Jury Deliberation,” August22-23, 1990

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – “Trial & Verdict Q & A Time; Jury Deliberation A; and JuryDeliberation B,” August 22-23, 1990

Box 133

109

VHS Cassette Tape – Seagate Technologies – “Mock Deposition: Cox,” January 2, 1991Box 133

VHS Cassette Tape – Seagate Technologies – “Mock Deposition: Cox,” January 2, 1991Box 133

VHS Cassette Tape – Seagate Technologies – “Mock Deposition: Shugart,” January 4,1991

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – Seagate Technologies – “Mock Deposition: Shugart,” January 4,1991

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – Seagate Technology – “Mock Deposition: Finis Connor,” January21, 1991

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – Seagate Technology – “Mock Deposition: Finis Connor,” January21, 1991

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – Seagate Technology – “Mock Deposition: Torkelson,” January 25,1991

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – Seagate Technology – “Mock Deposition: Torkelson,” January 25,1991

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – Rena Bartos, “The Founding Fathers of Advertising Research,”undated

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – “Dybul Crash Test Jury Research Background Presentation(Unedited),” undated

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – “EDB: Risk Communication,” tapes 1 & 2 – U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, undated

Box 133VHS Cassette Tape – “EDB: Risk Communication,” tapes 3 & 4 – U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, undated

Box 134VHS Cassette Tape – contents unknown, undated

Box 1341/2-inch videotape reel – Grandson of Tony Talks, 6, undated

Box 1341/2-inch videotape reel – a) Tony, Millard, Hans; b) Woman PDO from Miami; 8,undated

Box 1342.5-inch audiotape reel – Youth Service Bureau, Sunday afternoon session, January 24,1971. Speed: 3 ¾ ips, full track, running time: 45 minutes.

Box 1343.25-inch audiotape reel – “Religion and the Bomb,” by Hans Zeisel, undated.

Box 135

110

Audiotape reel – “U Civil,” User names: Kenneth Gerver and Susan Gray, August 3, 1978.800-6250 bpi.

Box 135Audiotape reel – “USF,” User names: Kenneth Gerver and Susan Gray, August 3, 1978.800-6250 bpi.

Box 135Audiotape reel – “U Judge,” User name: Susan Gray, undated. 800-6250 bpi.

Box 136Audiotape reel – “U Zeis1” User name: Hal Bloom, undated. 800-6250 bpi.

Box 136Audiotape reel – “U Zeisl,” User name: Joyce Weil, undated. 800-6250 bpi.

Series X: Oversize

This series contains press clippings, computer data printouts, and posters related to a variety ofZeisel’s research and teaching interests.

Box 137Folder 1

“The Castration of Adam,” – illustrated poster, circa 1964-1976Box 137Folder 2

Drug Monitoring – press clippings, circa 1990Box 137Folder 3

Graphs – teaching aids, undatedBox 137Folder 4

Inflation and Public Assistance study – computer data printouts, undatedBox 137Folder 5

Inflation and Public Assistance study – computer data printouts, undatedBox 137Folder 6

Responsibility – press clippings, 1957-1967Box Oversize Folder

John Zeisel – architectural poster, 1982

Series XI: Restricted

This series contains five subseries: Financial and Personnel Material; Student Material; LegalCorrespondence; Death Penalty Cases; and Consulting. Materials in Subseries One are restrictedfor fifty years from date of record creation. Materials in all other subseries are restricted for eightyyears from date of record creation.

Subseries One includes financial material related to grant budgets, primarily concerning the CivilJury Project, and personnel material such as letters of recommendations for colleagues, research

111

assistant applications, and University of Chicago faculty positions. Subseries One will be fullyopen in 2042.

Subseries Two contains letters of recommendation for University of Chicago students, gradedstudent material, and applications (including transcripts) for student research assistant positions.Subseries Two will be fully open in 2071.

Subseries Three includes correspondence with counsel, including both Zeisel’s personal attorneyand counsel engaged by the University of Chicago Law School to advise on the legality JuryProject studies in various courts of law. Subseries Three will be fully open in 2072.

Subseries Four contains correspondence, surveys, and court documents related to capitalpunishment cases for which Zeisel served as a consultant. Subseries Four will be fully open in2072.

Subseries Five includes documents related to Zeisel’s work as a litigation consultant. Headvised companies and their legal counsel on matters concerning trademark infringement andconfusion, jury selection, and general survey and sampling techniques. Files generally containcorrespondence, consumer surveys and reports, draft court documents, notes, and relatedresearch created in preparation for litigation. Zeisel worked with companies such as Ford,McDonald’s, MCI, and Exxon. Oversized consulting materials are located at the end of theseries. Subseries Five will be fully open in 2072.

Subseries 1: Financial and Personnel Material

Box 138Folder 1

Civil Jury Project National Science Foundation grant proposal – correspondence, report,and budget documents, 1977-1981

Box 138Folder 2

Civil Jury Project proposal binder – budget documents, reports, sample chapters, andresearch, 1979

Box 138Folder 3

David Freedman – correspondence regarding nominations for professional associations,1985-1991

Box 138Folder 4

Marion Harper, Jr. – financial correspondence, 1974Box 138Folder 5

The Jury in the Complex Case – grant proposal, correspondence, and court order ofapproval, 1986-1987

Box 138Folder 6

112

David Kaye – curricula vitae and letters of recommendation, 1983-1989Box 138Folder 7

Letters of Recommendation – colleagues and acquaintances, 1959-1992Box 138Folder 8

MacArthur Grant – correspondence and budget documents, 1987-1991Box 138Folder 9

National Science Foundation – voir dire project budget documents, 1972-1975Box 138Folder 10

Research assistant applications – resumes and cover letters, 1991Box 138Folder 11

University of Chicago faculty positions – correspondence, curricula vitae, and article draft,circa 1982-1989

Subseries 2: Student Material

Box 139Folder 1

“The Constitutional Guarantees of Trial by Jury in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, and RhodeIsland,” by Jay Smith, 1954

Box 139Folder 2

Letters of Recommendation – University of Chicago students, 1982-1986Box 139Folder 3

Research assistant applications – resumes, cover letters, and grade reports, 1991

Subseries 3: Legal Correspondence

Box 139Folder 4

Jury Project – jury recordings – correspondence with counsel, 1955-1958Box 139Folder 5

Jury Project – New Jersey Juror Interview Project – correspondence with counsel,1957-1958

Box 139Folder 6

Williams and Montgomery, Ltd. – Zeisel legal counsel, 1992

Subseries 4: Death Penalty Cases

Box 139Folder 7

Marshall Dayan – correspondence and questionnaire regarding James Little case, 1988

113

Box 139Folder 8

Free v. Peters – capital jury instructions survey, data, reports, and correspondence,1991-1992

Box 139Folder 9

Free v. Peters – capital jury instructions survey, data, reports, and correspondence,1991-1992

Box 139Folder 10

Free v. Peters – correspondence and expert witness documents, 1991-1992Box 139Folder 11

Free v. Peters – court opinion and petitions for writ of habeas corpus, 1991-1992Box 139Folder 12

Dickey Gaines – appellate brief and court opinion, 1987, 1988Box 139Folder 13

Dickey Gaines – correspondence and court documents, 1988Box 140Folder 1

Dickey Gaines – correspondence and court transcripts, 1985-1986Box 140Folder 2

Dickey Gaines – Petitioner’s Appendix including Zeisel affidavit, 1985Box 140Folder 3

Dickey Gaines – Zeisel affidavits on the death penalty, 1985-1986Box 140Folder 4

Georgia death penalty voir dire project – correspondence, reports, and notes, 1986-1987Box 140Folder 5

Georgia death penalty voir dire project – court transcripts, 1986-1987Box 140Folder 6

Georgia death penalty voir dire project – court transcripts, 1986-1987Box 140Folder 7

People v. Duncan – McClesky race experiment – correspondence, research, and notes,1986-1990

Box 140Folder 8

People v. Duncan – study instrument drafts and correspondence, 1987-1988Box 141

114

Folder 1People v. Duncan – study instrument drafts and correspondence, 1987-1988

Box 141Folder 2

People v. Duncan – study of jurors’ views, correspondence, and photographs, 1990Box 141Folder 3

Unidentified correspondence, 1977-1986

Subseries 5: Consulting

Box 141Folder 4

9 Lives – correspondence and research, 1974Box 141Folder 5

Agent Orange/Franklin National Bank – juror questionnaires, 1979-1985Box 141Folder 6

Agent Orange/Franklin National Bank – juror questionnaires, 1979-1985Box 141Folder 7

Alabama/DDT – survey, reports, and notes, circa 1986Box 141Folder 8

Americard – affidavits and survey notes and analysis, circa 1973-1975Box 141Folder 9

Anti-Monopoly Inc. – correspondence and survey reports, 1980-1983Box 141Folder 10

Arcata – statistical analysis reports, circa 1970sBox 141Folder 11

ASK Group – surveys, memoranda, and mock trial report, circa 1991Box 142Folder 1

Aspirin – FTC Request for Admission, 1977Box 142Folder 2

Aspirin – surveys, correspondence, and reports, 1976-1977Box 142Folder 3

Aspirin – surveys, correspondence, and reports, 1976-1977Box 142Folder 4

Atari – survey and court decision, circa 1982

115

Box 142Folder 5

Bethlehem Steel – surveys, correspondence, and court documents, 1983-1984Box 142Folder 6

Blue Chip – correspondence and memorandum, 1974Box 142Folder 7

Blue Cross-Blue Shield – surveys and report, 1984-1985Box 142Folder 8

Boston – Zeisel, “The Venire of Jurors and Grand Jurors in Boston, Massachusetts for theYear 1963,” – typescript report, 1965 (photocopy)

Box 142Folder 9

Braidwood Nuclear Plant – memoranda, court documents, and newspaper photocopies,1985-1986

Box 143Folder 1

Braidwood Nuclear Plant – Nuclear Regulatory Commission hearing transcript, 1986Box 143Folder 2

Bridgeport milling – surveys, correspondence, memoranda, and court documents,1983-1984

Box 143Folder 3


Box 143Folder 4


Box 143Folder 5

Brown & Williamson – correspondence, charts, and notes,Box 143Folder 6

California Cooler – surveys, 1984Box 143Folder 7

Canfield chocolate fudge soft drink – surveys, notes, court documents, 1983-1985Box 143Folder 8

Carson Pirie Scott v. Peter Pan Restaurants – correspondence and court decision, 1985Box 143Folder 9

116

Centaur Communications v. A/S/M Communications – correspondence and AmericanMarketing Association membership directory, 1986-1987

Box 143Folder 10

Chicago Park District – correspondence, memoranda, and court documents, 1978-1983Box 144Folder 1

Children’s Memorial Hospital – draft affidavits, correspondence, notes, 1982-1983Box 144Folder 2

Clairol – correspondence, 1983Box 144Folder 3

Contac – correspondence, 1979Box 144Folder 4

Continental Bank – customer segmentation study, 1984-1985Box 144Folder 5

Coors – survey report and court document, 1983-1984Box 144Folder 6

Country Cereal – studies and reports, 1977-1978Box 144Folder 7

Country Cereal – studies and reports, 1977-1978Box 144Folder 8

Country Time – studies, reports, and court documents, 1976-1977Box 144Folder 9

Country Time – studies, reports, and court documents, 1976-1977Box 144Folder 10

Crouse Cartage – correspondence, poll, and court documents, 1985Box 144Folder 11

Defender’s Program of San Diego Inc. – report, court documents, and notes, 1981-1983Box 144Folder 12

Delta Faucets – survey documents and correspondence, 1983-1984Box 145Folder 1

Bernadine Dohrn – correspondence, draft court document, and notes regarding barapplication, 1985-1987

Box 145

117

Folder 2Dunlop Tire and Rubber Co. – correspondence and court documents, 1983-1985

Box 145Folder 3

Eggo – correspondence, 1979Box 145Folder 4

Elderly Employees – correspondence and surveys, data, and reports regarding firings, 1985Box 145Folder 5



Exxon – company name study, circa 1980-1983Box 145Folder 8




Exxon – studies, correspondence, and court documents, 1978-1983Box 146Folder 3

Exxon – studies, correspondence, and court documents, 1978-1983Box 146Folder 4

Farm Coop – correspondence, studies, and notes, 1979-1982Box 146Folder 5

Farm Coop – correspondence, studies, and notes, 1979-1982Box 146Folder 6

Firestone – tire studies and correspondence, 1971-1980Box 146Folder 7

First National Bank – questionnaires, correspondence, and class action documents, 1976Box 146Folder 8

118

First National Bank – questionnaires, correspondence, and class action documents, 1976Box 147Folder 1

Footlocker – correspondence and photographs, 1982-1984Box 147Folder 2

Ford – AAMCO – reports on repairs, 1979-1980Box 147Folder 3

Ford – air bag report, 1986Box 147Folder 4

Ford – air bag surveys and correspondence, 1986Box 147Folder 5

Ford – air bag surveys and correspondence, 1987Box 147Folder 6

Ford – California State Automobile Association – transmission investigation reports(photocopies), 1978

Box 147Folder 7

Ford – Center for Auto Safety – correspondence, 1977-1978Box 147Folder 8

Ford – consultant correspondence, 1980Box 147Folder 9

Ford – draft affidavits, reports, and notes, 1980Box 147Folder 10

Ford – driver education plan, 1980Box 147Folder 11

Ford – Elias v. Ford – correspondence and memoranda, 1982Box 147Folder 12

Ford – fatality reports, 1980Box 148Folder 1

Ford – Fleet surveys and comments, 1978-1990Box 148Folder 2

Ford – frequency of event memoranda and notes, 1980Box 148Folder 3

119

Ford – general correspondence, 1979-1987Box 148Folder 4

Ford – General Motors comparisons – charts and notes, 1978-1980Box 148Folder 5

Ford – Internal Events – memoranda and notes, 1978-1980Box 148Folder 6

Ford – “Jury Research at Ford,” report, 1988Box 148Folder 7

Ford – jury selection – memoranda, interview forms, and questionnaires, 1979-1980Box 148Folder 8

Ford – jury selection – memoranda, interview forms, and questionnaires, 1979-1980Box 148Folder 9

Ford – jury selection – surveys and correspondence, 1984-1988Box 149Folder 1

Ford – jury selection – surveys and correspondence, 1984-1988Box 149Folder 2

Ford – Kirk v. Ford – correspondence and memoranda, 1981-1982Box 149Folder 3

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – correspondence, research,and memoranda, 1980-1985

Box 149Folder 4

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – correspondence, research,and memoranda, 1980-1985

Box 149Folder 5

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – hotline charts and notes,1977-1982

Box 149Folder 6

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – investigation materials,1980

Box 149Folder 7

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – memorandum on technicalissues, 1980

Box 149

120

Folder 8Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – “No Such Thing,” reportand notes, 1979-1980

Box 149Folder 9

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – public meetingpresentation materials, 1980

Box 150Folder 1


Box 150Folder 2


Box 150Folder 3


Box 150Folder 4

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – safety reports, 1977-1978Box 150Folder 5

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – safety reports, 1977-1978Box 150Folder 6

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – strategy memoranda andnotes, 1980

Box 150Folder 7

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – strategy notes, circa 1980Box 150Folder 8

Ford – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration case – surveys and reports, circa1978-1979

Box 150Folder 9

Ford – Ornelas v. Ford – correspondence and memoranda, 1981-1982Box 151Folder 1

Ford – Ornelas v. Ford – correspondence and memoranda, 1981-1982Box 151Folder 2

Ford – Pinto change-of-venue report and draft article, 1979-1980Box 151

121

Folder 3Ford – Pinto change-of-venue transcript, undated

Box 151Folder 4

Ford – Pinto graphs, undatedBox 151Folder 5

Ford – Pinto questionnaires and voir dire questions, circa 1979Box 151Folder 6

Ford – Pinto safety and liability research, 1980Box 151Folder 7

Ford – pre-trial issue analysis research, circa 1970s/1980sBox 151Folder 8

Ford – publicity reports, 1977-1980Box 152Folder 1

Ford – questionnaires, correspondence, and jury research, 1982-1986Box 152Folder 2

Ford – questionnaires, correspondence, and jury research, 1982-1986Box 152Folder 3

Ford – research plans, 1980Box 152Folder 4

Ford – surveys, undatedBox 152Folder 5

Ford – technical research, circa 1980Box 152Folder 6

Ford – transmission – investigative report and statistics, circa 1980Box 152Folder 7

Ford – Turner v. Ford – correspondence, memoranda, and strategy notes related to themock trial, 1985-1986

Box 152Folder 8

Ford – Turner v. Ford – surveys, articles, and memoranda, circa 1984-1985Box 152Folder 9

Fun Size – survey, reports, and court documents, undatedBox 152

122

Folder 10Fustok – jury questionnaires and correspondence, 1986

Box 152Folder 11

Gallo salami – correspondence and consumer perception report, 1980Box 153Folder 1

The Gap – correspondence, survey report, and deposition transcript, 1989Box 153Folder 2

The Gap – correspondence, survey report, and deposition transcript, 1989Box 153Folder 3

General correspondence, 1982-1988Box 153Folder 4

General Dynamics – survey, court documents, and notes, 1984-1985Box 153Folder 5

General Electric – correspondence, surveys, and juror list, 1980-1981Box 153Folder 6

General Mills – surveys, photographs, and notes, 1986Box 153Folder 7

Genetech – memoranda and questionnaires, 1991Box 153Folder 8

Gillette – correspondence and reports, circa 1977Box 153Folder 9

Great Adventure – questionnaires, data, correspondence, and court documents, 1985Box 153Folder 10

Great Adventure – surveys, data, and notes, 1984Box 153Folder 11

Gulf Oil – questionnaires, correspondence, memorandum, and notes, 1980-1981Box 153Folder 12

Gypsum Companies – surveys, correspondence, notes, and draft court documents,1982-1985

Box 154Folder 1


123

Box 154Folder 2


Box 154Folder 3

Gypsum Companies – surveys and related documents, 1973-1974Box 154Folder 4

Henri’s Food Products Co. v. Kraft Inc. – court transcript, circa 1980Box 154Folder 5

Henri’s Food Products Co. v. Kraft Inc. – surveys and court documents, 1980-1983Box 154Folder 6

Hershey’s – consumer awareness surveys, circa 1982-1991Box 154Folder 7

Hershey’s – consumer awareness surveys, circa 1982-1991Box 155Folder 1

Hershey’s – correspondence, survey reports, and court documents, 1982-1991Box 155Folder 2

Hershey’s – correspondence, surveys, data, and notes, 1982-1991Box 155Folder 3

Heublin Inc. – correspondence and jury research, 1982Box 155Folder 4

Hollister – correspondence and court documents, 1983Box 155Folder 5

Hormel – food product studies and reports, 1991Box 155Folder 6

Hormel – food product studies and reports, 1991Box 155Folder 7

Hummel – surveys, correspondence, and notes, 1981-1984Box 155Folder 8

Hyatt Regency walkway collapse/Hallmark – survey data, correspondence, and courtdocuments, 1982-1983

Box 155Folder 9

124

Hyatt Regency walkway collapse/Hallmark – survey data, correspondence, and courtdocuments, 1982-1983

Box 155Folder 10

Illinois Central Gulf – correspondence, memoranda, and graphs, 1978-1979Box 156Folder 1

Illinois v. Ross – court documents and statistical analysis, 1987Box 156Folder 2

Intel – correspondence and mock trial report, 1988-1989Box 156Folder 3

International Harvester – correspondence and notes, 1977-1978Box 156Folder 4

Japanese Consumer Electronic Case – correspondence, 1980Box 156Folder 5

Jewel – correspondence and mock trial report, 1986-1987Box 156Folder 6

Jewel – jury surveys and data, 1986-1989Box 156Folder 7

Johnson Products – surveys, correspondence, and court documents, 1989-1991Box 156Folder 8

Johnson Products – surveys, correspondence, and court documents, 1989-1991Box 156Folder 9

Johnson Products – survey reports and product packaging, 1989-1991Box 156Folder 10

Juror fees – People of the state of California v. Waddell – correspondence and courtdocuments, 1980

Box 156Folder 11

Kroger/Tylenol – studies, correspondence, court documents, and notes, 1982-1983Box 157Folder 1

Kroger/Tylenol – studies, correspondence, court documents, and notes, 1982-1983Box 157Folder 2

Lanard trucks – correspondence and survey, 1986Box 157

125

Folder 3Lancome – survey and reports, 1988

Box 157Folder 4

Sandy Lewis – correspondence, interview data, report, and clippings, 1988-1989Box 157Folder 5

Mastercard – gold card study and report, court documents, 1986-1988Box 157Folder 6

Mastercard – sample mailings, circa 1984Box 157Folder 7

Mastercard – surveys, correspondence, and notes, 1983Box 157Folder 8

McDonald’s – Arche Technologies – correspondence, trial transcripts, and notes, 1990Box 157Folder 9

McDonald’s – Arche Technologies – court documents, consumer confusion reports, andsurvey data, 1990

Box 157Folder 10

McDonald’s – McBagel’s – court opinion, 1986Box 158Folder 1

McDonald’s – McSleep/Quality Inns – consumer confusion report and draft Zeiselaffidavit, 1988

Box 158Folder 2

McDonald’s – McSleep/Quality Inns – deposition and court opinion, 1988Box 158Folder 3

McDonald’s – McSleep/Quality Inns – surveys, correspondence, and notes, 1988Box 158Folder 4

McDonald’s – McTeddy – affidavit, 1988Box 158Folder 5

McDonald’s – McTravel – deposition transcript, 1988Box 158Folder 6

McDonald’s – McTravel – deposition transcript, 1988Box 158Folder 7

McDonald’s – name surveys and reports, 1988

126

Box 158Folder 8

McDonald’s – Texas Style Burgers – court document, advertisements, and notes, 1990Box 159Folder 1

McDonald’s – Texas Style Burgers – surveys, reports, and notes, 1990Box 159Folder 2

McDonald’s – Texas Style Burgers – survey tabulations, 1990Box 159Folder 3

McDonald’s – Texas Style Burgers – survey tabulations, 1990Box 159Folder 4

MCI – mock jury transcripts, 1984Box 159Folder 5

MCI – mock jury transcripts, 1984Box 159Folder 6

MCI – Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court, 1983Box 159Folder 7

MCI – questionnaires and juror analysis, 1984-1985Box 159Folder 8

MCI – surveys, research, and notes, 1983Box 160Folder 1

MCI – Zeisel declarations, 1989-1990Box 160Folder 2

Mitsubishi – affidavits, survey, and data, 1982-1983Box 160Folder 3

Mitsubishi – surveys, court documents, and press release, 1982-1983Box 160Folder 4

Monsanto – Agent Orange – correspondence and court documents, 1984Box 160Folder 5

Monsanto – Agent Orange – jury selection – correspondence, questionnaires, and reports,1983-1984

Box 160Folder 6

127

Monsanto – Agent Orange – jury selection – correspondence, questionnaires, and reports,1983-1984

Box 160Folder 7

Monsanto – Agent Orange – memoranda regarding trial strategy and exposure levels, circa1984

Box 160Folder 8

Monsanto – Agent Orange – veterans’ exposure – Veterans’ Administration report andclipping, 1983, 1984

Box 161Folder 1

Monsanto – correspondence, memoranda, and notes, 1983-1985Box 161Folder 2

Monsanto – correspondence, memoranda, and notes, 1983-1985Box 161Folder 3

Monsanto – correspondence, surveys, data, and report, 1981-1982Box 161Folder 4

Monsanto – juror qualification questionnaires, 1977-1982Box 161Folder 5

Monsanto – juror qualification questionnaires, 1977-1982Box 161Folder 6

Monsanto – pollution surveys, 1982Box 161Folder 7

Monsanto – pollution surveys, 1982Box 161Folder 8

Monsanto – survey data and clippings (photocopies), circa 1978-1981Box 161Folder 9

Monsanto – trial preparation outlines and juror questionnaires, 1983Box 162Folder 1

Monsanto/Nitro trial – correspondence, jury research, and court documents, 1983-1984Box 162Folder 2

Monsanto/Nitro trial – correspondence, surveys, and notes, 1984Box 162Folder 3

Monsanto/Nitro trial – “‘Nitro’ Juror Selection Study,” 1984

128

Box 162Folder 4

Monsanto/Nitro trial – West Virginia chemical study, 1984Box 162Folder 5

National Football League – correspondence and brand report, 1974Box 162Folder 6

National Football League – report on legalized gambling, 1976Box 162Folder 7

Nebraska – correspondence, court documents, and press clippings, 1983-1984Box 162Folder 8

New York v. Kathy Boudin – affidavit, correspondence, and change-of-venue courtopinion, 1983

Box 162Folder 9

Newes – surveys, correspondence, draft court document, and reports, 1987-1991Box 162Folder 10

NIPSCO – survey, court documents, and press clippings, 1981-1983Box 163Folder 1

Nutrasweet – research outline and survey report, 1989-1991Box 163Folder 2

Ohlin – surveys, correspondence, and notes, 1983Box 163Folder 3

Ohlin – surveys, correspondence, and notes, 1983Box 163Folder 4

Oldsmobile – Zeisel commentary, circa 1980sBox 163Folder 5

Orange Crush – survey report, 1974Box 163Folder 6

Pan Lite – survey reports, court documents, and notes, 1990-1991Box 163Folder 7

Perrier – study, correspondence, budget documents, and research notes, 1980Box 163Folder 8

129

Pierce Foods Corporation/Wingdings – surveys, court documents, and Zeisel testimonytranscript, 1986-1987

Box 163Folder 9

Pillsbury – correspondence and charts for mock trial, 1989Box 163Folder 10

Pillsbury – sales charts and notes, 1988Box 163Folder 11

Pillsbury/Haagen-Dazs – correspondence, court documents, and notes, 1985-1989Box 163Folder 12

Pillsbury/Haagen-Dazs – correspondence, court documents, and notes, 1985-1989Box 164Folder 1

Pittway Corp. – draft court documents, circa 1987Box 164Folder 2

Playtex – articles and notes, circa 1982Box 164Folder 3

Playtex – trial transcript, 1982Box 164Folder 4



Potato Rolls – surveys, data, and notes, 1990-1992Box 164Folder 7

Rand Corporation – correspondence and notes, 1985Box 164Folder 8

Realpro – correspondence, deposition, and notes, 1981-1982Box 164Folder 9

Roland Food Corp. – surveys, correspondence, legal research, and court documents,1985-1986

Box 164Folder 10


130

Box 165Folder 1


Box 165Folder 2

Savin – surveys, correspondence, draft court documents, and notes, 1977Box 165Folder 3

S.C. Johnson – National Advertising Review Board documents and notes, 1975, 1979Box 165Folder 4

Seagate – correspondence, mock trial report, and notes, 1987-1991Box 165Folder 5

Seagate – master mock trial binder, 1990Box 165Folder 6

Seagate – master mock trial binder, 1990Box 165Folder 7

Seagate – mock trial binder, 1990Box 165Folder 8

Seagate – mock trial binder, circa 1990-1991Box 166Folder 1

Seagate – mock trial binder, 1991Box 166Folder 2

Sears PLC v. Sears Roebuck – correspondence, 1990-1991Box 166Folder 3

Sears Roebuck v. Allstate Driving School – court opinion and notes, circa 1969Box 166Folder 4

Shine-All – correspondence and court documents, 1989-1990Box 166Folder 5

SKK Inc. v. Cambridge Systems Group Inc. – software study and court transcripts, 1983Box 166Folder 6

SKK Inc. v. Cambridge Systems Group Inc. – software study and court transcripts, 1983Box 166Folder 7

Southern Airways – correspondence, surveys, and memorandum, 1980

131

Box 166Folder 8

Stanley Works – survey report and photographs, 1989Box 166Folder 9

Strey v. Hunt International Resources Corp. – correspondence and court documents, 1982Box 166Folder 10

Thomas v. State Industries – juror interview transcripts, 1990Box 166Folder 11

John Torkelson – court document, memoranda, and research, 1986-1991Box 167Folder 1

John Torkelson – deposition transcript, 1988Box 167Folder 2



Unidentified correspondence, 1971-1990Box 167Folder 5

Unidentified correspondence, 1971-1990Box 167Folder 6

Unidentified mock trial documents, 1986-1987Box 167Folder 7

Union Carbide – draft agreements with the government of India, circa 1984-1985Box 167Folder 8

United Airlines – correspondence, 1973Box 167Folder 9

United Airlines – correspondence, surveys, and notes, 1992Box 167Folder 10

United Airlines – court documents and correspondence related to jury selection,1987-1991

Box 168Folder 1

132

United Airlines – court documents and correspondence related to jury selection,1987-1991

Box 168Folder 2

United Airlines – court documents, report, and survey proposal, 1989-1991Box 168Folder 3

United Airlines – “Judicial Assessment of Punitive Damages, The Seventh Amendment,and the Politics of Jury Power,” Columbia Law Review, 1991

Box 168Folder 4

United Airlines – memorandum and survey data, 1991Box 168Folder 5

U.S. Tobacco – surveys, court documents, and notes 1984-1985Box 168Folder 6

United States v. Crawford – juror selection study, 1983-1984Box 168Folder 7

United States v. Crawford – surveys, correspondence, memoranda, and notes, 1983-1984Box 168Folder 8

United States v. Crawford – surveys, correspondence, memoranda, and notes, 1983-1984Box 169Folder 1

United States v. Tucker – affidavits, correspondence, and research, 1983Box 169Folder 2

United States v. Tucker – affidavits, correspondence, and research, 1983Box 169Folder 3

United Steelworkers – Audits & Surveys Inflation and Public Assistance Study –memoranda and correspondence, 1974-1976

Box 169Folder 4

United Steelworkers – Audits & Surveys memorandum and instructions, 1976Box 169Folder 5

United Steelworkers – Audits & Surveys validation forms, 1976Box 169Folder 6

United Steelworkers – Bureau of Labor Statistics census data, 1967-1977Box 169Folder 7

United Steelworkers – Bureau of Labor Statistics census data, 1967-1977

133

Box 169Folder 8

United Steelworkers – correspondence and answers to interrogatories, 1976-1977Box 169Folder 9

United Steelworkers – correspondence and special interrogatories, 1976-1977Box 169Folder 10

United Steelworkers – correspondence, supplemental answers to interrogatories, and notes,1974-1977

Box 170Folder 1

United Steelworkers – correspondence, supplemental answers to interrogatories, and notes,1974-1977

Box 170Folder 2

United Steelworkers – correspondence, survey data, and notes, 1975-1977Box 170Folder 3

United Steelworkers – Department of Commerce census tracts, 1972Box 170Folder 4



United Steelworkers – DePodwin study documents and Audits & Surveys surveydocuments, 1974-1976

Box 170Folder 7

United Steelworkers – Meyers deposition – Exhibit 5, Additional Tabulations, 1977Box 170Folder 8

United Steelworkers – Meyers deposition – Exhibit 5, Additional Tabulations, 1977Box 170Folder 9

United Steelworkers – Meyers deposition – notes and clippings, circa 1977Box 170Folder 10

United Steelworkers – “Notes on the DePodwin Report,” report and notes, circa1976-1977

Box 170Folder 11

United Steelworkers – notices of deposition and discovery requests, 1976-1977

134

Box 171Folder 1

United Steelworkers – “Public Assistance and its Impact on Collective Bargaining,” notes,1976

Box 171Folder 2

United Steelworkers – “Public Assistance and its Impact on Collective Bargaining,” notes,1976

Box 171Folder 3

United Steelworkers – “Public Assistance and its Impact on Collective Bargaining,” surveyreport, chapters 1-3, 1976

Box 171Folder 4

United Steelworkers – “Public Assistance and its Impact on Collective Bargaining,” surveyreport, chapter 4, 1976

Box 171Folder 5


Box 171Folder 6


Box 171Folder 7


Box 171Folder 8

United Steelworkers – questionnaires and screening forms from Audits & Surveys, 1974Box 171Folder 9

United Steelworkers – questionnaires and screening forms from Audits & Surveys, 1974Box 172Folder 1

United Steelworkers – sampling research – legal and statistical articles, 1944-1976Box 172Folder 2

United Steelworkers – sampling research – legal and statistical articles, 1944-1976Box 172Folder 3

United Steelworkers – survey data tables, undatedBox 172Folder 4

United Steelworkers – survey data tables, undated

135

Box 172Folder 5

University of Chicago/National Opinion• Research Center Arbitration Decision, 1972

Box 172Folder 6

Washington Public Power Supply System – attitude survey report, 1983Box 172Folder 7

Wilmad Glass Co. – correspondence, court documents, and notes, 1982Box 172Folder 8

Windsurfer – court documents, survey data and report, and notes, 1985Box 172Folder 9

Zeisel assorted affidavits, circa 1980sBox 173Folder 1

Firestone – advertisement, 1971Box 173Folder 2

Ford – GM advertisement, 1982Box 173Folder 3

Hyatt Regency walkway collapse/Hallmark – survey data and map, 1982-1983Box 173Folder 4

MCI – press clippings, 1983Box 173Folder 5

U.S. Tobacco – newspaper photocopies, 1984Box Oversize Folder

Ford – jury tabulations, circa 1982-1986