Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OREGON’S 7 PUBLIC
UNIVERSITIES:
ADVANCING OREGON
AND OREGONIANS
Days 11-13 BEN CANNON, Execu t i ve D i rec tor, HECC; BRIAN FOX, Admin i s t ra to r, Un ive r s i ty Budge t and F inance , HECC; Campus representa t ives
PRESENTED TO: JOINT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
OSU
2
Introduction: Oregon’s
7 public universities
Day 11, JOINT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SUPPORT FUND, TUITION-OFFSET CONTINUATION, DEBT SERVICE
BEN CANNON, Execut ive Di rector, HECC; BRIAN FOX, Di rector, Univers i ty Budget and F inance, HECC; Univers i ty Representa t ives
UO
3
PUBLIC UNIVERSITY FUNDING REQUEST
LAB=Legislatively Adopted Budget, GRB=Governor’s Recommended Budget, GF=General Funds, OF=Other Funds, FF=Federal Funds
1Reflects technical adjustment to GRB.
Activity Budget Items 2013-15 LAB 2015-17
GRB
Public University
Support
Public University Support Fund
POP 101: Tuition buy down continuation
POP 102: Additional PUSF
$520.5M GF --
--
Total: $520.5M
$513.3M GF + $41.1M GF
+ $34.6M GF1
Total: $589.0M
Debt Service Public University Debt Service $114.7M GF/LF
$161.4M GF/LF
4
Advance Oregon toward 40-40-20
• Aligning investment and policies with the state’s 40-40-20 goals
Affordability
• Reinvest in public universities, continue past tuition offset, and expand physical capacity
Student Success Outcomes
• Focus evaluation, KPM, and funding formula on student success, completions and equity
HECC BUDGET PRIORITIES
5
MEASURING OREGON AGAINST 40-40-20
35%
20%
18%
24%
Source: HECC analysis of the American Community Survey, ECONW
6
COMPLETION PIPELINE FOR YOUNG OREGONIANS
Source: EcoNorthwest analysis of NCES, ODE, CCWD and OUS data
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Deg
ree A
ttain
men
t R
ate
Years after expected HS graduation date
Oregon High School Cohort Degree Attainment Years After Anticipated High School Graduation
2005-06 BA
2006-07 BA
2007-08 BA
2008-09 BA
2009-10 BA
2010-11 BA
2011-12 BA
2012-13 BA
Goal BA*
Year represents
high school cohort
year
7
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Actual Projections
Source: OUS Office of Institutional Research, Projections March 2015
American Indian/Alaska Native Asian/Pacific Islander
Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic
OREGON PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES BY RACE/ETHNICITY, 2000-01 TO 2012-13 (ACTUAL), 2013-14 TO 2033-34 (PROJECTED)
2014-15
8
44,595 48,105 51,313 52,522 53,498 53,730 58,223 58,626 60,382 63,220 64,664 65,376 70,121 69,698 68,390
10,183 10,667
11,051 10,790 10,455 10,959 12,470 13,676
15,729 17,619
20,647 22,496 24,777 26,427 27,379
14,730 15,111
15,747 16,246 16,113 16,199 10,309 9,947
10,485 10,741
11,649 12,444
6,495 6,949 6,706
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Stu
den
t H
ead
co
un
t E
nro
llm
en
t,
4th
week
Fall
Term
Public University Enrollment, Fall Term Headcount by Fee Status: Resident, Nonresident and Part-Time Students
Resident Non-Resident Part-Time
TOTAL & RESIDENT ENROLLMENT (FTE)
Source: Oregon University System Office of Institutional Research
9
SERVING A MORE DIVERSE STUDENT BODY: ENROLLMENT BY RACE/ETHNICITY
Source: Oregon University System Office of Institutional Research
Federal reporting
changes in 2010
resulted in some
students moving
from the unknown
to the minority
category.
9.2 8.4 7.4 6.4 5.9 5.2 5.1 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.7
63.1 64.9 66.9 68.2 68.7 69.2 70.3 71.0 71.6 72.7 73.3
22.5 21.3 20.3 19.2 17.5 15.0 14.9 14.4 14.0 13.6 13.6
5.2 5.3 5.4 6.2 7.9 10.6 9.8 9.7 9.6 9.0 8.4
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
20142013201220112010200920082007200620052004
Enrollment by Racial/Ethnic Group, Fall 2004 through Fall 2014 (Minorities Grouped in a Single Category)
Nonresident Alien White Minority Unknown
10
ENROLLMENT OF LOW INCOME STUDENTS
17,763 16,848 15,996 16,297 17,237 22,311
26,784 29,055 28,882 29,162 27,818
47,471 48,962 49,625 51,106 53,785
53,132 53,597
55,071 56,612 57,869 58,089
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Undergraduate Student Enrollment by Pell Status
Pell Recipients Non-Pell Recipients
Source: Oregon University System Office of Institutional Research
11
RURAL FRESHMAN PARTICIPATION
2013-14 Public University Freshman Participation Rate as a
Percentage of Oregon Public High School Graduates, 2012-13
Source: Oregon University System Office of Institutional Research; Excludes home school completers and private high school graduates.
12
UNIVERSITY TRANSFER STUDENTS
4,159
4,588 4,854
5,099 5,041 4,769 4,907 4,823
5,710
6,541
7,065 7,119 7,005
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Tra
nsf
ers
Academic Years
Transfers from Oregon Community Colleges to the Public Universities
Source: Oregon University System Office of Institutional Research
13
COMPLETIONS AND DEGREE OUTPUT
12,840
21,359
9,620
15,019
3,220
6,340
0
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
20,000
24,000
1998-99 2001-02 2004-05 2007-08 2010-11 2013-14
Degre
es
Aw
ard
ed
Degrees Awarded, 1998-99 through 2013-14 (Undergraduate and Graduate)
Total
Resident
Nonresident
Source: OUS Institutional Research. Degree totals do not include Associate’s degrees or certificates.
14
39.7%
60.2%
44.4%
48.2%
55.7%
46.8%
57.7%
41.9%
55.1%
60.3%
55.3%
60.9%
39.3%
53.2%
61.0%
50.4%
60.3%
48.4%
52.9%
61.9%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
American Indian/AlaskanNative
Asian/Pacific Islander Black/African American Hispanic/Latino White
Public University Six-Year Graduation Rates by Race/Ethnicity
2001 Graduates1 2006 Graduates2 2011 Graduates3 2013 Graduates4
GRADUATION RATES BY RACE/ETHNICITY
60.3% 2013 Average 6-Year Graduation Rate
11995-96 Fall First-Time Freshman Cohort completing by June 2001 22000-01 Fall First-Time Freshman Cohort completing by June 2006 32005-06 Fall First-Time Freshman Cohort completing by June 2011 42007-08 Fall First-Time Freshman Cohort completing by June 2013 Source: OUS Institutional Research
15
RESIDENT DEGREES AWARDED AT OREGON PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES, BY PELL GRANT STATUS (UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE )
Source: OUS Institutional Research. Notes: Degree totals do not include certificates or Associate’s degrees. Collection of Pell data began in 2002-03. A student receiving a Pell in any year before graduating is included in the Pell category. NOTE: In 2008 Pell Grant eligibility was expanded significantly.
4,290
7,074
8,795
7,944
Total 13,085
Total 15,018
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Res
iden
t D
egre
es A
war
ded
Resident Degrees by Pell Status
No Pell
Pell
16
Projected high school cohorts are relatively flat, with increasing minority populations and decreasing transfer enrollment corresponding to CC enrollment declines
Growing university enrollment of minority students, particularly Hispanic/Latino students and low income students, with persistent completion gaps
Overall stabilizing or shrinking resident enrollment, as large cohorts from the recession complete college
Degrees granted to resident Pell Grant recipients now represent 47% of total resident degrees granted, and 57% percentage of undergraduate resident degrees granted
Completion rates for white students have increased, while progress for minority students is mixed
Additional enrollment will likely be from students least likely to enroll and complete today – additional support and focused investment on student success and completion will be required
UNIVERSITY ENROLLMENT/COMPLETION
17
STATE INVESTMENT
Sources: OUS Budget Summary’s 2006-07 through 2015-15 and 2015-17 GRB - Legislative funding change during the 2013-15 biennium separated State Programs from the Public University Support Fund. - 2013-15 State Programs includes ETIC appropriation after transition to OEIB
$30.3 $39.4 $68.7 $101.1 $114.8 $161.4 $99.6 $108.2
$98.4 $95.0
$101.1
$104.5
$592.4
$671.3 $601.5 $486.5
$40.6 $35.0
$520.5
$589.0
$728.0
$830.8
$778.2
$691.2
$785.0
$889.9
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 GRB
Pu
bli
c U
niv
ers
ity A
pp
rop
riati
on
s (
mil
lio
ns)
Public University Biennial Appropriations
Debt Service (GF & LF) SWPS Sports Lottery
Education & General (GF & ARRA) Public University Support Fund State Programs Public University Support Fund State Programs
18
$6,273
$5,480
$4,653
$5,143
$5,900
$5,417
$4,416
$5,289
$5,938
$1,500
$2,500
$3,500
$4,500
$5,500
$6,500
$7,500
University Funding per Resident FTE
Data Source: HECC Budget and Finance
STATE APPROPRIATIONS PER STUDENT N O N - I N F LAT I O N A D J U S T E D S TAT E A P P R O P R I AT I O N S , I N C L U D I N G E D U C AT I O N A N D G E N E R A L F U N D S A N D D E BT S E R V I C E
19
$3,203 $3,391 $3,529 $3,856
$4,770 $5,325
$5,913
$6,854
$7,917 $8,202
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2013
Ave
rag
e R
esi
den
t U
G T
uit
ion
Academic Year
Average Resident Undergraduate Tuition at Oregon’s Public Universities
TUITION AVERAGE OVER TIME
Source: OUS Institutional Research
20
UNIVERSITY: SHIFT OF COSTS FROM STATE TO STUDENT
Source: OUS Institutional Research
9% 8% 7% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
49% 46% 45% 51%
58% 58% 59% 66%
73%
43% 46% 47% 41%
34% 35% 33% 26%
19%
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Public University Percentage of Total Revenue by Source
StateAppropriations
Tuition and Fees
Other
21
EDUCATIONAL APPROPRIATIONS PER FTE STATE DIFFERENCES FROM U.S. AVERAGE, FISCAL 2013
Oregon
22
AL
AZ
AR
CA
CO
CT
DE
FL
GA
HI
ID
IL
IN
IA
KS
KY
LA
ME MD
MA
MI
MN
MO
MT
NE
NV
NH
NJ
NM
NY
NC
ND
OH OK OR
PA
RI
SC
SD TN
TX
UT VT
WA
WV
WI
WY US
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
$25,000 $35,000 $45,000 $55,000 $65,000 $75,000 $85,000 $95,000 $105,000 $115,000
Un
der
grad
uat
e C
reden
tial
s A
war
ded
per
100 F
TE
Stu
den
ts (
2011-1
2)
State, Local, Tuition and Fee Revenues per Credential Produced (2010-11)
High Productivity, Low Cost
Low Productivity, Low Cost
High Productivity, High Cost
Low Productivity, High Cost
Sources: NCHEMS Analysis of NCES, IPEDS Enrollment, Completions, and Finance Surveys
UNDERGRADUATE CREDENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY AND COST PER UNDERGRADUATE CREDENTIAL PRODUCED – PUBLIC RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS
Alaska = 167511.2/17.38
23
AL
AK
AZ
AR
CA
CO
CT
DE
FL
GA
HI
ID
IL
IN
IA
KS
KY
LA
ME
MD
MA MI
MN
MS
MO
MT
NE NV
NH
NJ
NM
NY
NC
ND
OH
OK
OR
PA RI
SC
SD
TN
TX
UT
VT
VA
WA
WV
WI
US
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
$20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 $90,000
Un
der
grad
uat
e C
reden
tial
s A
war
ded
per
100 F
TE
Stu
den
ts (
2011-1
2)
State, Local, Tuition and Fee Revenues per Credential Produced (2010-11)
High Productivity, Low Cost
Low Productivity, Low Cost
High Productivity, High Cost
Low Productivity, High Cost
UNDERGRADUATE CREDENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY AND COST PER UNDERGRADUATE CREDENTIAL PRODUCED – PUBLIC BACHELOR’S AND MASTER’S INSTITUTIONS
Sources: NCHEMS Analysis of NCES, IPEDS Enrollment, Completions, and Finance Surveys
24
State operating funding has declined since 2007-09 on a non-inflation adjusted basis.
- Debt service has increased significantly as the state traded operating investments for capital investments which cost less at the time and directly stimulated the economy.
Enrollment growth and tuition increases made up for state disinvestment.
Universities receive significantly less state support on a per student basis than their peers in other states.
Oregon’s public universities are remarkably efficient at successfully serving students with relatively little total resources.
UNIVERSITY FUNDING AND PRODUCTIVITY
25
To reach 40-40-20, Oregon needs to
increase the number of Oregon students
successfully completing the
certificate, degree, and credential programs in
which they have invested.
Shifts the basis for state funding
distribution from enrollment – seats in a
class– to access and successful program
completion, joining 35 states that have moved to include outcomes as part of their funding
system.
Provides resources and incentives to foster
campus-level innovations to increase
student success — especially among the
least represented student populations such as low-income,
rural and underserved minorities.
STUDENT SUCCESS FUNDING FOR OREGON'S PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES
26
Model under consideration would:
Provide base support recognizing the distinctiveness of each university in its institutional mission and scope, as well as research, public service and partnerships.
Reward degree and certificate completion—including supporting students’ completion and seamless transfers from community colleges.
Provide incentives for institutions to support highest need and underrepresented students—such as low-income, underrepresented minority, rural and veteran students.
Serve the state’s economic development goals through increased funding for degrees in high-demand/high-reward fields, such as those leading to careers in healthcare, STEM and bilingual education.
UNIVERSITY FUNDING STUDENT SUCCESS AND COMPLETION
How have
universities been
involved? In June 2014, the HECC
formed a technical
workgroup to make
recommendations and
develop an outcomes-
based funding model
to staff. The workgroup
membership includes
senior financial and
academic leaders from
each of the seven public
universities, and
leadership from the Inter-
institutional Faculty
Senate and the Oregon
Student Association.
27
University Measures
First-year retention rate
Six-year graduation rate
Number of bachelor’s degrees awarded each academic year
Number of bachelor’s degrees awarded to transfer students from Oregon
community colleges each academic year
Graduation rate for newly admitted undergraduate students who are not first-
time full-time freshman students within 6 years
RESULTS FOR OREGON STUDENTS PROPOSED KPMS FOR PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES
28
Measures
Median earnings of college completers 4 quarters and 5 years after
completion (CC’s)
Median earnings of students who left but earned at least 12 credits (CC’s)
Median earnings of graduating students (BA/BS only) 4 quarters and 5
years after graduation (university)
RESULTS FOR OREGON STUDENTS: PROPOSED KPMS RELATED TO GRADUATE EARNINGS
29
Public University
Representative Presentations
PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SUPPORT FUND
Day 11 , JO INT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS , SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
30
Public University
Presentations, continued:
Diverse Missions
Day 12, JOINT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS, RESEARCH, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PARTNERSHIPS, ETIC
UO
BRIAN FOX, Di rector, Univers i ty Budget and F inance, HECC;
Univers i ty Representat ives
31
ETIC, STATE PROGRAMS FUNDING REQUEST
LAB=Legislatively Adopted Budget, GRB=Governor’s Recommended Budget, GF=General Funds, OF=Other Funds, FF=Federal Funds
1HECC 2013-15 LAB included ETIC funding for a portion of the biennium (remainder at OEIB). 2HECC 2015-17 base budget includes no ETIC funding (all at OEIB).
Activity Budget Items 2013-15 LAB 2015-17 GRB
State Programs
including ETIC
Public programs including ETIC
• ETIC “Sustaining Funds” transfer
POP 90
$25.5M $10.6M
$24.5M
Total: $35.0M
32
Programs operated largely by the three research universities which focus on economic development, industry and public service needs of Oregon
Legislatively appropriated line items, support and extend key capacities of research universities for the betterment of the state
Programs range from mediation and conflict resolution training to demographic forecasting and maritime research
STATE PROGRAMS
33
STATE PROGRAMS
Public University State Programs
University Program Funding
All ETIC Sustaining Funds $24.5M
PSU & UO Dispute Resolution Center $2.5M
PSU Oregon Solutions $2.3M
OSU, PSU & UO Signature Research Centers $1.0M
Oregon Metals Initiative $749K
UO Labor Education Research Center $679K
PSU Population Research Center $535K
OSU Institute of Natural Resources $399K
UO & L&C Clinical Legal Education $349K
OSU Oregon Climate Change Research Institute $313K
OSU Oceangoing Research Vessel $620K
OSU Fermentation Science $1.2M
Total $35.0M
34
ETIC began in 1997 and focused on developing capacity in engineering and technology education and innovation
ETIC funding provided bedrock support to university high-tech focused programs, creating research and faculty capacity
ETIC has split its focus on “sustaining” and a more nimble “renewable” funding model
Renewable funding will f low through OEIB/OED
HECC will engage with stakeholders to focus sustaining dollars through a formula driven allocation model
ETIC RECONFIGURATION, POP 90
35
Public University
Representative Presentations
PUBLIC SERVICE RESEARCH STATE PROGRAMS ETIC
Day 12 , JO INT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS , SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
STATEWIDE PUBLIC
SERVICE PROGRAMS &
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION
Day 13, JOINT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
OSU
SOU
BRIAN FOX, Administrator, Univers i ty Budget and F inance, HECC;
Univers i ty Representat ives
37
Statewide Public
Services
Day 13, JOINT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS,
SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
BRIAN FOX, Administrator, Universi ty
Budget and Finance, HECC;
Universi ty Representat ives
OSU
38
STATEWIDE PUBLIC SERVICES FUNDING REQUEST
Budget Items 2013-15 LAB 2015-17
GRB
Extension Service $39.9M GF $41.2M GF
Forest Research Laboratory $6.1M GF
$6.3M GF
Agriculture Experiment Station $55.2M GF
$57M GF
Total $101.2M GF $104.5M GF
LAB=Legislatively Adopted Budget, GRB=Governor’s Recommended Budget, GF=General Funds, OF=Other Funds, FF=Federal Funds
39
STATEWIDE PUBLIC SERVICES
Agricultural Experiment Station: AES is the principal agricultural and related natural resource research agency of the State of Oregon. AES mission is to conduct research to solve problems and generate innovations in the agricultural, biological, social and environmental sciences relating to Oregon agriculture, associated industries and natural resources.
Extension Service: OSU Extension Service is the community-based education outreach arm of Oregon’s land, sea, sun and space grant-university. It is cooperatively funded from federal, state, county and other sources. OSU-ES engages the people of Oregon with research-based knowledge and education that strengthen communities and economies, sustain natural resources, and promote healthy families and individuals.
Forest Research Laboratory: The FRL is Oregon’s forest resources research agency that helps solve problems, create opportunities, and develop new understanding and innovation about forest ecosystems, forest management and forest-derived renewable materials. FRL is also the research component of Oregon State University’s College of Forestry.
40
Public University
Representative Presentations
STATEWIDE PUBLIC SERVICES
Day 13 , JO INT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS , SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
AGRICULTURAL EXPER IMENT STATION
EXTENSION SERV ICE
FOREST RESEARCH LABORATORY
41
Capital
Construction
Day 14
BRIAN FOX, Administrator, Universi ty
Budget and Finance, HECC;
Universi ty Representat ives
UO
42
CAPITAL BOND CAPACITY REQUEST
Activity Budget Items 2013-15 LAB 2015-17
GRB
University Capital
Bond Capacity
New bond capacity (repaid from state
GF/LF)
New bond capacity (campus-repaid)
$246.4M
$383.8M
Total: $630.2M
$275.5M
$53.0M
Total: $328.5M
University Debt Service Debt Service (GF/LF): $89.2M GF
$25.6M LF
Total: $114.7M
$129.4M GF
$32.0M LF
Total: $161.4M
LAB=Legislatively Adopted Budget, GRB=Governor’s Recommended Budget, GF=General Funds, OF=Other Funds, FF=Federal Funds
43
Public University Facilities – Fall 2014
Buildings GSF Notes
Total State 6,698 54,175,063
Total University 1,320 28,018,285 51% of State capital Assets
Total E&G 900 15,449,509 55% of university assets
Total Aux & Other 420 12,568,776 45% of university assets
Individual Institutions E&G GSF and Buildings
Institutions Buildings GSF % of Total E&G Space
EOU 21 517,110 3.3%
OIT 32 759,267 4.9%
OSU 554 6,287,399 40.7%
PSU 32 1,939,879 12.6%
SOU 22 882,575 5.7%
UO 203 4,344,935 28.1%
WOU 36 718,344 4.6%
UNIVERSITY CAPITAL PORTFOLIO
Data Source: DAS Capital Finance and Planning, HECC University Finance and Budget analysis of institutional data.
44
Institutions E&G GSF* Space Over 30
Years Old*
Deferred
Maintenance
Backlog*
Deferred
Maintenance
Backlog per
Relevant
GSF*
Seismic Backlog
(Estimated by OUS
based on 2007 report)
EOU 585,481 76% $18M $30 $17M
OIT 468,211 70% $33m $71 $3M
OSU 4,454,036 77% $155M $36 $166M
PSU 2,414,452 84% $169M $70 $23M
SOU 865,645 80% $18M $21 $28M
UO 3,483,674 72% $105M $30 $73M
WOU 695,132 77% $30M $42 $40M
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE AND BUILDING AGE, BY INSTITUTION (E&G SPACE ONLY)
Sources: OUS 2012 Sightlines Report, OUS 2013 Factbook and 2007 Statewide Seismic Needs Assessment by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
45
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE BY TYPE
Building Exterior $53.3M
10%
Electrical $168.1M
32%
Fire Protection/Detection
$18.1M 4%
Interiors and Built-Up Equipment $119.1M
23%
Mechanical $122.4M
23%
Plumbing $38.0M
7%
Roofing $6.8M
1%
Small Building-All Renewal $1.9M
0%
Data Sources: OUS 2013 Factbook and OUS 2012 Sightlines Report
46
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
Data Source: OUS Budget Summaries 2005-2006, through 2014-15, Governor's Recommended Budget (2015-17)
$114.9
$233.5 $221.9
$112.5
$246.4 $275.5
$295.4
$327.8
$462.4
$231.5
$383.8
$170.4
$410.3
$561.3
$684.3
$344.0
$630.2
$445.9
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 GRB
Bie
nn
ial C
apit
al B
ud
get
(mill
ion
s)
General Fund and State Backed Debt
Total State Capital Budget Campus /Non-State Funded Capital Budget
47
STATE FUNDED UNIVERSITY DEBT SERVICE (GF+LF)
Data Source: OUS Budget Summaries 2005-2006, through 2014-15, Governor's Recommended Budget (2015-17), and University Shared Services Enterprise
$33.1
$52.7
$82.1
$101.2
$114.7
$161.4
$174.6
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 GRB 2017-19 Forecast
Sta
te F
un
ded
Deb
t S
erv
ice (
in M
illi
on
s)
Biennia
Total State Funded Debt Service (GF+LF)
48
2015-17 Capital Reauthorizations
Institution Project State Funding
(type)
* EOU Eastern Learning Commons Planning/Design and
Infrastructure Upgrades
$2.0M (XI-Q)
* OIT Cornett Hall Renovation Design/Planning $2.0M (XI-Q)
OSU OSU Modular Data Center $7.0M (XI-F)
PSU University Center Land Purchase $7.9M (XI-F)
* EOU and OIT Capital Planning bonding was repurposed for IT and other projects was included in
SB 5543 (2015) 2013-15 rebalance bill which has passed both chambers and was signed by the
Governor on March 30, 2015. These projects no longer require reauthorization.
CAPITAL REAUTHORIZATIONS (UNIVERSITIES)
Data Source: HECC, SB 5543
49
GRB finalized list……………Dec.
Assist in GRB Considerations……………Oct.
HECC Scoring and ARB development……………Aug.-Sept.
University President’s develop Tier I, II and III capital list……………July
HECC Capital Principles and Scoring Rubric development…………June-July
University capital submission……………April
HECC PROCESS
50
All state backed debt will support the Commission’s Strategic Plan through investments in:
Classroom, Laboratory, Research or Student Services space
Institutions must plan for ongoing operational and maintenance needs of current and future capital portfolio
State backed debt will serve either to
Expand capacity to meet needs of students
Extend the useful life of current capital assets
Develop or extend key competitive advantages
Projects which generate operational cost savings will be priorit ized
The HECC, in conjunction with institutions will evaluate key capacity constraints across the portfolio of institutions to priorit ize investment
Public-private and multi -party collaborations will be encouraged
Leveraging of non-state resources, including private and university funds will be encouraged
Deferred maintenance and capital debt priorit ization will focus on aligning economic incentives of institutions and state capital investment
HECC UNIVERSITY CAPITAL PRINCIPLES
Source: HECC Principles to Guide the Prioritization of State General Obligation and State Backed Debt Financed Projects
51
Project must meet Campus Master Plan, OEIB and HECC Strategic Plans…………………………………………………… threshold
• Ease capacity constraints within portfolio…………………. 10 pts
• Support student completion………………………………….... 10 pts
• Support research & economic development……………….. 5 pts
• Collaboration…………………………………………………….....… 5 pts
HECC priorities
Deferred maintenance and cost savings……................... 10 pts
Life, safety and code compliance…………………………….… 10 pts
Campus priority…………………………………………..…………… 20 pts
Enhance current efforts………………………………………….... 5 pts
Leveraging campus and external support………………….…15 pts
Strategic priority………………………………………………….…. 10 pts
HECC CAPITAL RUBRIC
Source: HECC 2015-17 University Capital Project Prioritization Scoring Rubric
52
Priority Univ. Project State Funding
(type)
University
Funding (Type)
Total Project
Scope
1 All Capital Repair and Renewal $72.0 M (XI-Q) $0 $72.0 M
2 PSU Neuberger Hall $60.0 M (XI-G/Q) $10M $70.0 M
3 OSU Forest Science Complex $30.0 M (XI-G) $30M $60.0 M
4 UO Klamath Hall for 21st Century Chemistry $12.3 M (XI-G/Q) $6.25M $18.5 M
5 OSU Marine Studies Campus Phase I $25.0 M (XI-G) $25M $50.0 M
6 UO College and Careers Building $17.0 M (XI-Q) $17M $34.0 M
7* OIT Ctr for Excellence in Engineering &
Technology
$3.5 M (XI-Q) $0 $3.5 M
8* OIT Bolvin Hall Modernization $7.4 M (XI-Q) $0 $7.4 M
9 UO Chapman Hall Renovation $8.0 M (XI-G/Q) $2.5M) $10.5 M
10 WOU Natural Science Building (NS) Renovation $6.0 M (XI-Q) $0 $6.0 M
11 SOU Britt Hall Renovation $4.8 M (XI-Q) $0 $4.8 M
12 EOU Hunt Hall Demolition and Site Restoration $3.0 M (XI-Q) $0 $3.0 M
13 UO Learning and Innovation Hub - School of
A&AA/Research Innovation Ctr
$26.6 M (XI-G) $26.6 $53.3 M
NA PSU Broadway Housing Purchase $0 $53.0M (XI-F) $53.0 M
Technical Adjustment
*7 OIT Ctr for Excellence in Eng. & Tech. Phase I $10.9 M (XI-G/Q) $1.7M $12.6 M
2015-17 GRB: UNIVERSITY CAPITAL PROJECTS
Source: 2015-17 Governor’s Recommended Budget *OIT’s two capital projects will be combined through a technical adjustment to the GRB into Phase I of the Center for Excellence in Engineering and Technology
53
Public University
Representative Presentations
UNIVERSITY CAPITAL PROJECTS
Day 13 , JO INT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS , SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
54
Public comment
Day 14
OREGON HEALTH &
SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY
Day 15 BEN CANNON, Executive Director, HECC;
JOE ROBERTSON, President, OHSU
PRESENTED TO:
JOINT COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
56
OHSU REQUEST
Activity Budget Items 2013-15 LAB 2015-17 GRB
OHSU OHSU support funding $72.6M GF $77.3M GF1
Debt service OHSU Bond-Related Costs* $0.0M GF $17.7M GF
Source: 2015-17 Governor’s Recommended Budget *Excludes Master Tobacco Settlement funded debt service
57
Public comment
Day 15 (par t i a l day )