Upload
dodan
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HROA/002
IKC
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
This case was written by Senthil Ganesan, with the help of Sreedhar Babu Kanuri, IKC. It was compiled from published
sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective
handling of a management situation.
2003, IKC. All rights reserved.
To order copies, call 0091-40-2343-0462/63 or write to ICMR, Plot # 49, Nagarjuna Hills, Hyderabad 500 082, India or email [email protected].
www.icmrindia.org
1
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
UPSer:...As you know, our company is experiencing a series of dynamic changes. We are, more than ever, questioning why and how we do everything associated with running our business. During this time, we have come to realize that many of the traditional processes we have become accustomed to need to change because they continue to increase our operating costs. We all need to admit to...shortcomings and then commit to becoming advocates for the change required to move to a much higher level.
-Kent Nelson, Former CEO1
Introduction Atlanta based United Parcel Service (UPS), the largest package delivery company in the US, provided various specialized transportation and logistics services. In 2002, UPS transported more than 13 million packages and documents per business day throughout the US and to more than 200 countries and territories (2002 delivery volume was 3.4 billion packages and documents). It used a fleet of about 88,000 motor vehicles and more than 575 jet aircraft to serve about 1.8 million shipping customers per business day. During peak season- between Thanksgiving and Christmas, UPS delivered an average of 208 packages a second. In 2001, UPS had acquired companies like Fritz Companies (global freight forwarding, customs brokerage and logistics company) and First International Bancorp (leader in the use of US government-guaranteed loan programs). For the year ending 2002, UPS reported revenues of $31.3 billion ($30.3 billion in 2001) and net income
of $2.4 billion ($2.4 billion in 2001) (See Exhibit I for segment wise revenue split-up). Managers, employees, retirees, and the founders’ family owned 90% of UPS and controlled 99% of the voting power. UPS had come a long way from a private messenger and delivery service in 1907 to become an integrated supply chain management and logistics solutions provider. It had been successful in translating itself from a small regional parcel delivery service into a global company. UPS had attracted customers by offering them various choices: fast flights vs. cheap ground delivery, simple shipping or a panoply of manufacturing, warehousing, and supply-chain services, etc. The company had a huge transportation infrastructure suitably supported by its expertise in supply chain management and other technological solutions. UPS was also engaged in the delivery of goods purchased over the Internet. UPS had emerged as the preferred carrier for more than 55% (10% for FedEx) of the purchases made via the Internet. In 1994, facing increased competition and technological advancements, UPS had announced that it would focus more on “Quality.” The company had traditionally been focused on operations with not much thought to what a customer actually wanted or if he or she was completely satisfied with the service. CEO Kent Nelson commented
2:
1 Kathi Decker, Shara Engleman, Tony Petrucci, Shirley Robinson, “United Parcel Service and the Management of
Change,” College of Business and Public Administration, University of Louisville. 2 -do-
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
2
“Change is not easy and the transition from the „Old‟ to the „New‟ UPS while traveling down the „Road to Quality‟ will prove to be long trip for a company deeply grounded in tradition.”
Subsequent to the corporate philosophy change, UPS had made significant progress in being
attuned to customer needs. But the demands of globalization and the greater expectations of
customers remained major challenges for UPS to address.
Exhibit: I
Segment Wise Revenue Split-Up
US Domestic Package
Ground 15,707 15,671
Next-day Air 5,349 5,433
Deferred 2,868 2,893
International Package
Export 3,276 2,931
Domestic 943 907
Cargo 461 407
Non Package
UPS Logistics Group 1,024 738
UPS Freight Services 945 741
Other 699 600
Total 31,272 30,321
Source: www.hoovers.com
Background Note
In 1907, James Casey realized that there was a tremendous need for private messenger and
delivery services. Until that time, most messages and packages were delivered using domestic help
(Only few Americans had telephones, and the US Post Office had not yet started its parcel post
system). With a seed capital of $100 that he had borrowed from a friend, Casey started his
company in Seattle, Washington and named it “American Messenger Company” (AMC). Casey
started offering services with six messengers and two bicycles (He later switched to motorcycles
and a Model T Ford). AMC’s popularity swiftly increased even though the competition was
intense. To build on his company’s growth and popularity, Casey emphasized four success
parameters- customer courtesy, reliability, round the clock service and low rates. AMC soon
started using the slogan: “Best Service and Lowest Rates.”
In 1913, Casey decided to merge his company with a competitor, Evert McCabe, to form
Merchants Parcel Delivery (MPD). He realized that there was a good opportunity to offer
packaging and transportation services to retail stores and that his company was too small to handle
the higher volumes. MPD soon pioneered “consolidated delivery”-- combining packages addressed
to a certain neighborhood on to one delivery vehicle. Towards the end of the decade, Casey took a
decision to unionize his workforce and invited the International Brotherhood of Teamsters to
represent his drivers and part time employees. Soon UPS launched various innovations such as
variable start time, minimum work rules, working across job classifications, combinations of
inside and outside labor, part time employment for half the work force and mandatory overtime as
needed.
During the 1920s, MPD grew rapidly and expanded its services to the cities of Oakland and Los
Angeles in the state of California. By the end of the decade, MPD had its presence in almost all the
major cities of the West Coast. It soon started offering intra-city services in New York City.
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
3
During this time, the company changed its name to United Parcel Service (UPS). Casey explained
the logic behind the new name: “United because shipments were consolidated, and Service
because service is all we have to offer.” Feeling that brown was neat, dignified, and professional,
Casey ordered that all his delivery vehicles be painted brown. Casey was a stickler for perfection
and professionalism and he laid a strict dress code for his workers- they all had to wear brown
uniforms, neatly pressed, with shoes shined. The vehicles were to be well maintained and washed
everyday. He operated the company like a military unit, ordering recruits to be polite at all times
and meet service commitments. In 1929, the company formulated “The Policy Book” to
standardize these practices in all the cities.
World War II changed the nature of UPS’ business. In an effort to cut costs, most customers
started carrying their packages themselves from the stores. This situation continued even after the
war, although for a different reason. With growing urbanization, many people started migrating
towards cities that were characterized by neighborhood markets (corner stores) and huge shopping
centers. Also impromptu shopping became a part of the urban lifestyle. Since most of the
customers had their own cars, it was easy for them to drive home with their packages. Hence, not
many were willing to pay for delivery. This change compelled the company to adapt a business
model that would weather any possible changes in consumer psychology. UPS decided to be a
“common carrier” that would legally allow it to deliver packages between any two addresses in the
US for both private and commercial customers. During this time, only the state run United States
Postal Service (USPS) was authorized to be such a carrier. As a common carrier, UPS was legally
required to serve any shipper who was willing to pay, no matter how small the shipment or how
remote the destination address. The strategy was easier conceived than implemented. The problem
was that UPS was restricted from operating in most parts of the US. The company had to get
federal approval for carrying the packages across each state border. It was not until 1975 when
UPS was given authorization in all 48 mainland states.
While UPS was trying to gain national parcel delivery status, it also continued to expand its
services to all the major cities in the country. In 1953, it started air delivery service using planes
owned by passenger airline companies. UPS named this service the Blue Label Air and offered
two-day delivery service to major cities on both the East and West coasts. Blue Label Air was an
also-ran service for most of the years. Meanwhile new companies like FedEx (started in 1973)
were making phenomenal progress. By the late 1970s, airfreight volumes were growing by 15-
20% annually and FedEx was doubling its profits and tripling its revenues. This phenomenal
growth caught the attention of the UPS senior management. The timing was perfect. In 1978, the
US government decided to deregulate the airlines and air-cargo industry and this proved to be a
blessing for UPS. The deregulation affected two business segments:
Common carriers specializing in small package delivery on the ground and
Airfreight forwarders
Prior to deregulation, common carriers like UPS were not allowed to own their aircraft without the
scrutiny (there were restrictions as to how much load an airline could carry) of the Civil
Aeronautics Board (CAB). Instead, they had to use passenger and freighter aircraft (operated by
carriers like American Airlines, Flying Tigers, etc) or buy small aircraft (Falcons) that were
approved by the CAB. Airfreight forwarders (e.g., Airborne Freight) were carriers that were
involved in the pickup and delivery of freight to be transported on either commercial or freighter
aircraft owned by others. Following deregulation, most common carriers and forwarders purchased
their own aircraft and transformed themselves into an integrated air transportation company. To
facilitate air delivery service, UPS decided to build a hub in Louisville, Kentucky that would act as
central sorting center for all the regional hubs. In 1983, this hub was equipped to handle the large
volumes of overnight delivery and also second-day delivery. By 1985, UPS was able to offer
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
4
overnight delivery services to almost all major cities in the US. By 1987, the company owned 89
aircraft (plus 13 Boeing 757 jets) and leased 140. It was during this time, that UPS started
international operations to several countries in the Americas, Eastern and Western Europe, the
Middle East, Africa and the Pacific Rim. During the late 1980s, UPS began to upgrade its
technology by installing on-board computers in its vans and cars.
In the early 1990s, UPS faced stiff competition from formidable rivals like FedEx, Roadway
Packaging System (RPS), USPS and DHL. UPS began to overhaul its image and the way it
conducted business. Kent Nelson, CEO during this time, confirmed3:
“Gone is the „we-know-what‟s-best-for-you‟ arrogance that was UPS hallmark for
decades. UPS will now stress customer satisfaction.”
UPS decided to achieve total customer satisfaction by improving its operating quality standards.
Jim Kelly, who succeeded Nelson as the CEO, remarked4:
“Our journey toward Quality began with the realization that we were at a competitive
disadvantage in several areas. We needed to improve our time-in-transit performance and
customer perceptions of the dependability of our services. We needed to overcome the
misconception that our competitors were more technologically advanced than UPS. And
we realized that we were in danger of becoming the high-cost carrier in the small package
delivery business.”
Between 1994 and 1997, UPS faced serious union related issues. In 1994, the Teamsters union
staged a one-day strike (the cost to UPS was about $50 million) to protest against the new per-
package weight limit, which was raised from 70 to 150 pounds. In 1997, the Teamsters organized a
15-day strike that cost the company hundreds of millions of dollars. The union protested against
the company’s policy of hiring thousands of part-time workers. The Teamsters gained popularity
among the public as the strike rapidly became a rallying point for part-time/temporary workers and
those stuck in low-skill, low-wage jobs. Although businesses throughout the US were seriously
inconvenienced, public sentiment seemed to be with the strikers. To settle the strike, UPS
combined several part-time jobs into 10,000 new full-time positions. UPS also dropped plans to
opt out of a pension program for the workers. In addition, the company agreed to give wage hikes,
which would average 15% for full timers and 35% for part timers over the next five years. The
Teamsters, on their part, agreed to a five-year wage contract, instead of the usual three-year pact.
Many insiders suggested that UPS had mismanaged the entire episode and that the company failed
to anticipate a strike.
Although, the strike cut into profits, UPS fought back to regain the customers’ faith. UPS lowered
fuel costs, reduced its US workforce, cancelled plans for new purchases, and boosted its air
volumes. UPS also took efforts to strengthen its Internet presence. At this time, more than 50% of
all shipment-order information from customers came electronically. UPS responded to this need by
introducing UPS Document Exchange in 1997. This was a secure document-transmission service
that operated over the Internet.
In November 1999, UPS announced a public offering of 110 million shares of common stock at
$50 per share, the largest IPO ever by a US company at that time. Also that year, UPS Capital was
established as a subsidiary. UPS paid $450 million for freight-forwarder Fritz Companies as part
of its push to expand in the logistics segment. The company also acquired Uni-Data, a global
3 Kathi Decker, Shara Engleman, Tony Petrucci, Shirley Robinson, “United Parcel Service and the Management of
Change,” College of Business and Public Administration, University of Louisville. 4 Management Conference Highlights, Atlanta, Georgia, 1996.
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
5
logistics company based in Germany. UPS also expanded its portfolio of services with several
acquisitions. These included Hybrid mail, a blend of electronic and physical first-class mail, Flats-
the postal term for mail that was larger than a letter, but typically smaller than a parcel, and UPS
Presort, a daily mail pick-up service mainly targeted at small- and medium-sized businesses that
did not typically qualify for discounts on postage costs.
Following the retirement of Jim Kelly in January 2002, Michael Eskew became the CEO. He
began the process of contract negotiations with the Teamsters Union, which represented 210,000
UPS drivers and other employees. The management and the union agreed on a six year contract
valued at $9 billion. This contract aimed at increasing wages and benefits for the workers and also
add new union jobs. The previous five-year contract was valued at $4.2 billion.
Business Segments
UPS operated in the following business areas:
Domestic Services
This included Domestic Ground and Domestic Air. Domestic package delivery accounted for 76%
(78% in 2001) of total revenues in 2002. UPS handled about 12.5 million daily shipments
(domestic). 85% of this was done through its Ground delivery service. Since its inception, UPS
had been engaged primarily in the delivery of packages by means of ground transportation. Over
the course of its existence, the company had been successful in expanding its service (interstate
and intrastate) gradually to all 48 contiguous states plus services to Alaska and Hawaii. The
company’s air delivery service also contributed significantly to revenues with Next Day Air and
deferred air delivery options commanding prices that were two to four times those of ground
service and were growing significantly faster than the ground business. UPS Next Day Air offered
guaranteed next business day delivery by 10:30 AM to more than 75% of the US population and
delivery by noon to areas covering an additional 14% of the population.
International Services
UPS started full-fledged international operations in 1975. In 2002, it handled close to 1.2 million
international shipments per day. The company provided services to about 200 countries and
provided guaranteed overnight delivery to major business centers in Europe and Asia. Some of the
services included UPS Worldwide Express and UPS Worldwide Expedited that guaranteed 8:00
AM, 8:30 AM, 10:30 AM and 12:00 Noon next business day delivery to major cities around the
world. It also offered complete customs clearance service for any mode of transportation
(regardless of carrier), at all UPS Customhouse Brokerage sites in the US, Canada and other
regions. In providing international services, the company competed with major players like FedEx,
USPS, Airborne Express, DHL Worldwide Express, Deutsche Post and TNT Group. In 2002,
international operations contributed about 16% (14% in 2001) of total revenues. Revenues from
this service were growing faster than the domestic business and industry experts believed that this
trend would continue for the next few years.
Non-packaging Businesses
Non- packaging businesses included UPS Logistics Group, UPS Capital Corp and UPS
Professional Services. These businesses accounted for the remaining 8% (8% in 2001) of 2002
revenues and were considered to be the fastest growing segment within UPS. UPS Logistics
provided supply chain management, transportation services, service parts logistics and logistics
technologies. Among UPS’s supply-chain management clients were Nike.com, Raytheon,
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
6
Siemens, Bank One, Compaq, Sprint, etc. UPS Capital provided commercial finance products
including equipment leasing, asset-based lending, accounts receivable purchasing, corporate
finance, inventory purchases, letters of credit, etc. It also owned insurance company, Glenlake
Financial, which provided excess value insurance, flexible parcel insurance and credit insurance.
UPS Professional Services was set up to provide supply chain management services to medium
and large sized businesses. This division also had plans to advise its clients on such areas like
product design, sales and marketing, planning, procurement, production and cash management.
Corporate Culture and Organizational Change
UPS had spent decades sticking to tried-and-true practices and strategies. For example, UPS
drivers were trained on how to quickly buckle and unbuckle seat belts also to put their seat belts on
with their left hand while simultaneously putting the key in the ignition with their right hand.
Drivers were also required to presort parcels for five stops ahead. UPS ardently followed Casey’s
principle up until the 1990s. But over time such techniques had become outdated as smaller upstart
rivals and old foes became competitive. UPS soon realized that excelling in operational aspects
alone was not enough for it to maintain a competitive advantage in the delivery market. UPS began
to examine what its customers wanted and realized the need to change its style of functioning.
Traditionally, UPS’s management style had been risk averse. It had emphasized formalized
procedures, a highly centralized structure, a higher ratio of superiors to subordinates, formal
control systems, seniority more than performance, an aversion to accepting new ideas and a
promote-from-within mentality (Kelly started his career as a driver in 1964 and Eskew as an
Engineer in 1972). The company felt that such culture could be applicable anytime and that there
was no need for change. Senior executives would say: “but we’ve always done it like this...look
how profitable we are.” When Kelly succeeded Nelson, the “U” in UPS often stood for
“unyielding” or “unbeatable.” Kelly indicated he would change the meaning to “unbelievable” and
“unlimited.”
UPS looked for ways to make its delivery process more efficient and also wanted to be sure that
customer satisfaction be met. As one senior official at UPS put it5:
“Consider this scenario. The driver steps from the truck moving quickly inside the office.
Handing the employee at the counter a package, the driver requests a signature on a
hand-held computer. Chatting amiably they talk about the customer‟s satisfaction with this
delivery as well as services overall. Concluding the conversation, the driver steps back in
the brown truck setting the DIAD (Delivery Information Acquisition Device) into the
DIAD Vehicle Adaptor (DVA) and instantly relays real-time package delivery information
worldwide within minutes of the transaction completion. Such efficiency is what UPS is
actually aiming for.”
Implementation of this idea however proved tough. UPS drivers were more worried about time
constraints and meeting schedules rather than customer satisfaction. The company realized that its
corporate culture had to change. This transformation started to affect every part of its organization,
including employee functions and roles within the organization. Emphasis shifted from training
drivers to step out of the truck on their right foot (to save precious seconds of delivery time), to
training drivers to interact with their customers and learn their needs. Emphasis shifted from the
needs of the organization to those of the customers- both internal and external.
5 Kathi Decker, Shara Engleman, Tony Petrucci, Shirley Robinson, “United Parcel Service and the Management of
Change,” College of Business and Public Administration, University of Louisville.
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
7
To educate its employees about the change in focus and also enable them to develop the necessary skills and competence to implement these changes, UPS contracted with the Atlanta Consulting Group to conduct workshops. Two workshops were conducted during this time- “Trust & Teamwork” and “Quality at Work.” The objectives of the Trust & Teamwork workshop varied from building teamwork to building self-confidence at the workplace (See Exhibit I). All management and full-time employees were required to attend this three-day workshop, which consisted of lectures, games and various learning exercises. The aim was to show the relationship between trust and organizational performance, and how teamwork required a win/win mindset as opposed to a win/lose mindset. This workshop also dealt with five fundamental (HEART) principles of human interaction:
1. Hear and understand me. 2. Even if you disagree, please don’t make me wrong. 3. Acknowledge the greatness within me. 4. Remember to look for my loving intentions
5. Tell me the truth with compassion
Exhibit: II
The Objectives of Trust and Teamwork Workshop
Source: Kathi Decker, Shara Engleman, Tony Petrucci, Shirley Robinson, “United Parcel Service and the Management of Change,” College of Business and Public Administration, University of Louisville.
Each person who attended the workshop received a copy of the book, “Managing From The Heart” and was encouraged to read it and apply its principles to his or her personal and professional life. The HEART principles were considered as a definite indicator of change at UPS because UPS now stressed the importance of “love” at the workplace. Participants, however, had mixed feelings about this workshop. Many employees suspected that the “soft-side” of UPS did not exist. The workshop trainers had to really convince the employees that UPS was indeed serious about this change. During the workshop, the trainers highlighted the need for change:
“To survive and prosper in today‟s and tomorrow‟s global economy will be difficult, if not impossible, for organizations in which people don‟t trust each other. Trust is the „miracle ingredient in organizational life- a lubricant that reduces friction, a bonding agent that glues together disparate parts and a catalyst that facilitates action.‟ We believe that trust is the most fundamental fabric of any organization. Without trust, collaboration and teamwork are impossible.”
Following the workshop, posters were stuck on the office walls reminding everyone to adopt the principles learned. The summary of the workshop proceedings was also sent as a reminder via office mail.
The “Quality at Work” workshop gave employees a clear vision of where the company was heading and how it planned to get there. On the first day, trainers asked the managers to list down three things: what to take with them on the road to quality, what to leave behind and what new
Build teamwork and collaboration in our work with others.
Understand the role trust and credibility play in our personal effectiveness.
Create an environment of win-win problem solving.
Listen with skill and understanding.
Take responsibility for producing desired results.
Give and receive feedback effectively.
Confront others in a caring and constructive way.
Build self-confidence.
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
8
things to acquire for the trip. This workshop helped the employees to analyze and improve their work methods in order to better serve their internal and external customers. The company later used several methods to follow up and reiterate the training that employees received in the workshop. One method was the weekly email message called the “Quality Update.”
While concentrating on its culture change, UPS also kept improving its operations. The company
adopted a TQM approach during this time. A special management session of DOF (Delivering Our
Future- Taking a Leadership Role in Total Quality) was designed to create an awareness of the
competitive reasons for Total Quality and the role all managers at UPS would play in the quality
process. During the DOF training, exercises and presentations were conducted to teach trust and
management led change. Training on empowerment and possible breakdowns during
empowerment, soft skill development such as listening, etc., was also conducted. Throughout the
training, it was mentioned several times that UPS was really good at what it did, but still needed to
change. The Quality process started in November 1994 with the help of the Atlanta Consulting
Group. As a result of this process, eighteen strategies were developed in August 1995 and
identified as critical to the company’s future success (See Exhibit II). The first eight were
considered priority initiatives, which were started in January of 1996 while the remaining were
implemented beginning May 1997.
One group that was significantly affected by UPS’s transformation was the Industrial Engineering (IE) department. This department was involved in activities such as auditing, reporting, time measurement of the company’s various operations. In conjunction with its transformation plans, UPS started reevaluating its departments and made significant changes. However the IE department was still internally focused. UPS immediately formed the IE Reassessment Group to reengineer IE (which had not been greatly modified since 1962), which was spending more than 80% of its time in activities that did not add value to UPS customers. Which hand the UPS driver should hold his keys in, which foot to use when stepping up into the package car, and how long it should take to deliver one package were not really beneficial to the UPS customer. With help from consultants from Coopers and Lybrand, IE shifted its focus to outcomes such as customer satisfaction, volume development, customer logistics, etc. (See Exhibit III)
Exhibit: III
Shift of Focus
Priority Initiatives Remaining Strategies
Retention, Hiring, Orientation & Mentoring Employee Scheduling
Cost Factors Customer Point of Contact
Asset Utilization Support and Service
Training and Education Peak Season Aircraft (Leased)
Measurement Leadership
Technology Investment Employee Involvement
Communication Labor Union Partnership
Gateway Reassessment Planning Activities
Fleet Planning
Regulatory Reform
Source: Kathi Decker, Shara Engleman, Tony Petrucci, Shirley Robinson, “United Parcel Service and the
Management of Change,” College of Business and Public Administration, University of Louisville.
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
9
Nelson felt that the successful implementation of change in the company was due to employee’s receptiveness
6:
“UPS employees were ready for the change--more ready than you might find in most companies. This is because of the fact that UPS managers and supervisors are also UPS owners. Their life‟s savings are tied up in it. Change meant UPS people would have to tackle their jobs differently. But first we had to change the mindset of our people. In the past, UPS was always focused on how to become more efficient and reliable in order to effectively serve its customers. UPS went so far as to tell its customers why it was in their best interests „to use the services we provide in the way we want you to use them.”
UPS started to look at itself through its customer’s eyes. Every application the company implemented had to meet a documented customer need, improve service in a measurable way, and save the company money over time. UPS implemented online self-service applications and an automated voice-response system, to ensure that a customer could reach an associate anytime of the day. Customer satisfaction reports were also obtained through the face-to-face interactions its drivers had with the customers. Drivers were able to use the Internet to report customer needs to the sales team. If a sales person made a sale based on that lead, the driver was given points on a debit card that could be used as cash. This increased sales encouraged drivers to become more aware of customer needs.
Exhibit: IV The new goals for UPS’s IE Team
Source: Kathi Decker, Shara Engleman, Tony Petrucci, Shirley Robinson, “United Parcel Service and the Management of Change,” College of Business and Public Administration, University of Louisville.
To keep its employees continuously motivated and embrace the change, UPS improved upon its existing employee ownership plans. The plan was designed so that in profitable years, all employees shared in the company’s profits, earning far more than they would in a normal salary. The company also had in place three profit sharing plans:
Thrift plan: For all regular employees who had completed atleast one year of service.
UPS Management Incentive Plan: For full time managers and
Stock Option Plan: For all employees holding positions equal to or above the division manager level.
UPS also offered a host of benefits aimed at providing long-term financial security and immediate health care services to all employees. Both the retirement and health care plans were non-contributory for all employees who met minimum age and service requirements. Even part time employees received retirement and healthcare benefits.
6 Kathi Decker, Shara Engleman, Tony Petrucci, Shirley Robinson, “United Parcel Service and the Management of
Change,” College of Business and Public Administration, University of Louisville.
Become more focused on the external customer;
Set as a goal a 90% rating for internal customer satisfaction;
Identify and apply new technology that would improve existing operations and develop new
business;
Decrease time spent on auditing and reports;
Concentrate on improving operational areas that have value to the external customer; and
Spend less time on time study, and more time on training UPS management and hourly
employees in job methods.
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
10
UPS believed that communication between departments (and individuals) was essential to promote
a sense of ownership among everyone. UPS wanted each person to know what the other person’s
activities were. To this effect, a publication called “The Big Idea” was produced and distributed
within every district to inform employees about national and local UPS news. Weekly Monday
meetings were held in the headquarters, where representatives from each department met with the
top management committee. Each representative reported on his or her department’s previous
week’s accomplishments and the following week’s objectives. Issues like safety, employee
recognition, new programs and policies, technology, customer priority, assignment changes and
training programs were reviewed. Each spring, a conference involving the Top 200 managers in
the company was held for discussing the future strategic plans and present organizational
accomplishments.
Standard methods like performance appraisals and opinion surveys were used to communicate
opinions and performance levels in specified task areas. For verbal communication, districts held
Pre-work Communications Meetings (PCMs). A PCM was a three minute meeting held prior to the
start of each work day in the hub or package center to discuss either specific questions about work
tasks or large issue like competition and strategic direction. For more personal one-on-one
communication, a managerial tool called the “Talk, Listen, Act” (TLA) program was used to
encourage closer coordination and interaction between managers, supervisors, package handlers,
and drivers. A TLA was a scheduled meeting that gave employees protected time to express
concerns, make suggestions, or simply establish more informal relationships with their managers.
TLA meetings were required and monitored by the company for each employee and his or her
immediate manager.
Other surveys included the “Quality Performance Review (QPR),” which was an automated 360-
degree feedback process that was conducted every six months. QPR measured critical skills such
as customer focus, financial and internal business process knowledge, people skills, business
values and leadership. Before any 360-degree evaluation occurred, HR trainers held a mini-
training session with participants to explain the purpose and process of the survey tool. Employees
could download information about the process from the company’s intranet. The employees
themselves initiated the peer-review process twice a year, asking their peers, supervisors and
others to evaluate them. Peers, subordinates and bosses rated managers on a scale of one to seven.
Scores were then reviewed with supervisors and direct reports. Based on that feedback, employees
decided on their goals for the next six months. The HR department offered additional training or
skills development if needed. The employees checked their improvements and results again six
months later.
Another important aspect of keeping employees attuned to customers was the Community
Internship Program (CIP) started in 1968 under James Casey’s direction. Casey started this one-
month program to expose UPS’s predominantly white managers to the poverty and inequality
exploding into violence in many cities. The program also aimed at helping UPS managers realize
issues related to diversity and culture. Every summer, UPS handpicked about 50 of its middle level
managers and sent them across the country to offer community service to local populations. These
managers encountered problems like housing, education, healthcare, etc that a lower level UPS
employee also would face. This community service helped them realize what problems each UPS
employee would be facing at home. Business Week magazine reported7:
“By forcing managers to grapple with the same problems, UPS hopes to awaken them to
the difficulties many of their employees face, bridging the cultural divide that separates a
white manager from an African-American driver or an upper-income suburbanite from a
7 Louis Lavelle, “For UPS Managers, A School of Hard Knocks,” Business Week, 22nd July 2002
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
11
worker raised in the rural South. This is a necessity for UPS, where minorities--many from
poor neighborhoods--make up 35% of the workforce and 52% of new hires. Three out of
four managers, meanwhile, are white.”
Programs were directed at part time workers (mostly filled by college students) as well. UPS
started offering tuition and other financial assistance to recruits willing to sign up with the
company and work their way through college. Since the company had a policy of promotion from
within, UPS expected that most of the college graduates would consider full time positions at the
end of their studies. Through this Earn and Learn Program (started in August 1999), participants
received up to $1,500 per semester and $3,000 per year in tuition assistance, with a cap of $15,000.
In addition, the program provided up to $2,000 a year in student loans for a maximum of four
years, which could be used for housing and other expenses. If the employee worked at UPS for
four years while attending college, the company would waive up to $8,000 in loans, making the
students liable only for the interest payments. In return for such assistance, employees agreed to
work five 4-hour shifts per week during afternoon, evening or late night hours. UPS also made
arrangements with 242 colleges to allow deferred billing for tuition, fees and other expenses.
Under the deferred billing, UPS reimbursed colleges for classes that were completed by the
employees. Participants were required to maintain passing grades to remain in the program. By
2002, the Earn and Learn Program had helped more than 20,000 students attend college. UPS had
separate tuition reimbursement programs for full-time employees.
Future Outlook
The organizational change implemented in the mid- 1990s had made UPS more attentive to
customer needs and also changing market & technology factors. The company’s profit had grown
rapidly at a compound rate of about 20% since 1997. It achieved its growth by fast expanding into
international markets and by embracing new technologies. As of 2002, UPS operated in 451
markets across the globe. However, the company could no longer count on geographic expansion
for the bulk of its growth. Moreover the competitive landscape had considerably changed. UPS’s
dominant position as a ground carrier was greatly threatened by the success of FedEx’s ground
service unit. Though UPS still maintained a leading market share, the company had announced
plans to concentrate equally on its other business segments. Eskew’s strategy was to offer new
services to existing customers. UPS’ logistics unit, for example, packed and shipped Compaq
computers and Samsung cell phones for delivery, and also handled repairs and returns.
UPS expected its non-package businesses to contribute heavily to its top and bottom line. The
optimism was based on the general trend that most companies were in need of an expert to manage
their goods, be it inventory or goods in transit. Most companies wanted to use a fast and cheaper
way to solve these issues. In 2002, the logistics group generated $1.02 billion in revenues out of
SCM solutions. The management and several Wall Street analysts predicted an annual growth of
about 20 to 30% for the next several years. Since January 2001, UPS had made 20 acquisitions of
smaller businesses that handled some form of supply-chain management in areas from banking to
customs. UPS was also putting great hopes on its UPS Capital group. According to industry
observers, this group had a great potential to finance virtually the entire supply chain for small,
medium and large companies. As a finance company, it could finance inventory coming in,
inventory being warehoused, and inventory moving out to the end user. It could pick up the
receivables created by the deliveries. Many industry experts were of the opinion that UPS Capital
was moving in the same direction as GE Capital.
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
12
With such increased focus on its non-package businesses, there was also wide spread concern that
UPS was moving away from its core transportation business. However, in an interview to Business
Week magazine Eskew defended the company strategy8:
“We‟re not looking to do everything for every company. We‟re still largely in the small-
package delivery business. That‟s roughly a $60 billion market in the US. But the
worldwide supply-chain and logistics market is about a $3 trillion market, so that‟s where
we‟ll see much of our growth. We‟re not talking about moving ore from the mines to the
blast furnaces. We‟re talking about streamlining inventories. It can be taking cars to
dealers from the factory, as we do for Ford Motor Co.—we‟re taking about $1 billion
annually in inventory off their books. The idea is to let our customers focus on their core
business and let us run the distribution networks. We know better than anyone how to
wrap information around goods so that businesses can better see what‟s coming.”
8 David Shook, Q&A: The Man Who‟s Repackaging UPS, Business Week Online, 03rd June 2002
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
13
Bibliography
Magazines/Journals/Newspapers
1. Kathi Decker, Shara Engleman, Tony Petrucci and Shirley Robinson, “United Parcel
Service and the Management of Change,” College of Business and Public Administration,
University of Louisville.
2. Jeffrey Sonnenfield and Meredith Lazo, “United Parcel Service (A),” Harvard Business
School Publishing, March 23, 1992.
3. Avital Louria Hahn, “Men in brown: A growth story,” Investment Dealer’s Digest, 13th
December 1999.
4. Kelly Barron, “Logistics in Brown,” Forbes, January 10, 2000.
5. Brian O’Reilly, “They’ve Got Mail,” Fortune, February 7, 2000.
6. Charles Haddad, “Big Brown’s Big Coup,” Business Week, September 18, 2000.
7. Philip Seikman, “New Victories in the Supply Chain Revolution,” Fortune, October 30,
2000.
8. Stephanie Wilkinson, “It’s All in the Delivery,” eWeek, November 13, 2000.
9. Lea Soupata, “Moving People to Jobs: Lessons from UPS’s Transportation Plan,”
Workforce, February 2001.
10. “UPS Vs. FedEx: Ground Wars,” Business Week Online, May 21, 2001.
11. Richard Stice, “Industry Surveys: Transportation (Commercial),” Standard & Poor’s,
July 12, 2001.
12. Amy Tsao, “Can UPS Deliver in a Downturn,” Business Week, July 26, 2001.
13. Charles Haddad, “How UPS Delivered Through the Disaster,” Business Week, October 1,
2001.
14. Julia Kirby, “Reinvention with Respect: A Interview with Jim Kelly of UPS,” Harvard
Business Review, November 2001.
15. Roger Morton, “Small parcel’s big 3,” Transportation and Distribution, March 2002.
16. Kristin Krause, “One UPS Face,” Traffic World, March 4, 2002.
17. David Shook, “FedEx Keeps Delivering,” Business Week, April 26, 2002.
18. Sidney Rutberg, “Financing the supply chain by piggy-backing on the massive distribution
clout of United Parcel Service,” The Secured Lender, May/June 2002.
19. “UPS Is Constructively Dissatisfied,” Business Week, May 13, 2002.
20. Jon Birger and Michael Eskew, “A Big Question for Big Brown,” Money, June 2002.
21. David Shook, “Q&A: The Man Who’s Repackaging UPS,” Business Week, June 3, 2002.
22. Brian Grow, “UPS Doesn’t Deliver for Part-Timers,” Business Week,
Managing Change at United Parcel Service (UPS)
14
23. Louis Lavelle, “For UPS Managers, A School of Hard Knocks,” Business Week, July 22,
2002.
24. Robin Ajello, “Big Brown’s Big Deal With Workers,” Business Week, July 29, 2002.
25. Paul Miller, “UPS Guarantees Residential Ground Deliveries,” Catalog Age, September
2002.
26. John Schulz, “Teamsters Ok UPS Six-year Deal,” Traffic World, September 9, 2002.
27. William Armbruster, “UPS to Repackage Logistics Operations,” Journal of Commerce,
November 11, 2002.
28. Dale Buss, “Up With Brown,” Brandweek, January 27, 2003.
29. Daniel Fisher, “Free Flight,” Forbes, February 3, 2003.
30. “UPS,” FSB: Fortune Small Business, April 2003.
31. Charles Haddad, “UPS: Can It Keep Delivering,” Business Week, April 8, 2003.
Websites
1. www.ups.com
2. www.businessweek.com
3. www.cnnfn.com
4. www.couriermagazine.com
5. www.economist.com
6. http://finance.yahoo.com
7. www.forbes.com
8. www.fortune.com
9. www.hoovers.com
10. www.multexinvestor.com
11. www.time.com