35
KMS2014 DESIGN & MANAGEMENT OF TRAINING PROGRAMME Evaluation of Training Programmes

Unit 8 updated

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Unit 8 updated

KMS2014 DESIGN & MANAGEMENT OF TRAINING

PROGRAMME

Evaluation of Training Programmes

Page 2: Unit 8 updated

Objectives:At the end of this unit, students will be able

to:• Explain why evaluation is important.• Identify and choose outcomes to

evaluate a training program.• Discuss the process used to plan and

implement a good training evaluation.• Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of

different evaluation designs.• Explain the process of conducting a cost-

benefit analysis for a training program.

Page 3: Unit 8 updated

IntroductionIntroduction• Training effectivenessTraining effectiveness

– the benefits that the company and the trainees receive from training

• Training outcomes or criteriaTraining outcomes or criteria– measures that the trainer and the company use to

evaluate training programs

• Training evaluationTraining evaluation– the process of collecting the outcomes needed to

determine if training is effective

• Evaluation designEvaluation design– from whom, what, when, and how information

needed for determining the effectiveness of the training program will be collected

Page 4: Unit 8 updated

Reasons for Evaluating Training Reasons for Evaluating Training • Companies are investing millions of dollars

in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage

• Training investment is increasing because learning creates knowledge– This differentiates between those

companies and employees who are successful and those who are not

• Because companies have made large dollar investments in training and education and view training as a strategy to be successful, they expect the outcomes or benefits related to training to be measurable

Page 5: Unit 8 updated

Training evaluationTraining evaluation provides the data needed to

demonstrate that training does provide benefits to the

company.

Page 6: Unit 8 updated

Types of evaluation• Formative evaluation

• Summative evaluation

Page 7: Unit 8 updated

Formative EvaluationFormative Evaluation• The evaluation of training that takes place

during program design and development

• Helps to ensure that:– the training program is well organized and runs

smoothly– trainees learn and are satisfied with the

program

• Provides information about how to make the program better

Page 8: Unit 8 updated

Pilot TestingPilot Testing• The process of previewing the training

program with potential trainees and managers or with other customers

• It can be used: – as a “dress rehearsal” to show the program to

managers, trainees, and customers – for formative evaluation

Page 9: Unit 8 updated

Summative EvaluationSummative Evaluation• Evaluation conducted to determine

the extent to which trainees have changed as a result of participating in the training program

• May also measure the return on investment (ROI) that the company receives from the training program

Page 10: Unit 8 updated

Why Should A Training Program Be Evaluated?Why Should A Training Program Be Evaluated?• To identify the program’s strengths

and weaknesses

• To assess whether content, organization, and administration of the program contribute to learning and the use of training content on the job

• To identify which trainees benefited most or least from the program

Page 11: Unit 8 updated

Why Should A Training Program Be Evaluated?-ctd.Why Should A Training Program Be Evaluated?-ctd.• To gather data to assist in marketing

training programs• To determine the financial benefits

and costs of the programs• To compare the costs and benefits of

training versus non-training investments

• To compare the costs and benefits of different training programs to choose the best program

Page 12: Unit 8 updated

The Evaluation ProcessThe Evaluation Process

Conduct a Needs AnalysisConduct a Needs Analysis

Develop Measurable Learning Outcomes Develop Measurable Learning Outcomes and Analyze Transfer of Trainingand Analyze Transfer of Training

Develop Outcome MeasuresDevelop Outcome Measures

Choose an Evaluation StrategyChoose an Evaluation Strategy

Plan and Execute the EvaluationPlan and Execute the Evaluation

Page 13: Unit 8 updated

Training Outcomes: Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Framework of Evaluation CriteriaTraining Outcomes: Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Framework of Evaluation Criteria

Level Criteria Focus

1 Reactions Trainee satisfaction

2 Learning Acquisition of knowledge, skills, attitudes, behavior

3 Behavior Improvement of behavior on the job

4 Results Business results achieved by trainees

Page 14: Unit 8 updated

Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training ProgramsOutcomes Used in Evaluating Training Programs

AffectiveOutcomes

ResultsReturn onInvestment

CognitiveOutcomes

Skill-BasedOutcomes

Page 15: Unit 8 updated

• Cognitive outcomesCognitive outcomes– determine the degree to which trainees are

familiar with the principles, facts, techniques, procedures, or processes emphasized in the training program

– measure what knowledge trainees learned in the program

• Skill-based outcomesSkill-based outcomes– assess the level of technical or motor skills– include acquisition or learning of skills and use

of skills on the job

Page 16: Unit 8 updated

• Affective outcomesAffective outcomes– include attitudes and motivation–reaction outcomes – trainees’ perceptions

of the program including the facilities, trainers, and content

• ResultsResults–determine the training program’s payoff

for the company

Page 17: Unit 8 updated

• Return on Investment (ROI)–comparing the training’s monetary

benefits with the cost of the training• direct costs• indirect costs• benefits

Page 18: Unit 8 updated

Determining Whether Outcomes Are GoodDetermining Whether Outcomes Are Good

Good training outcomes need to be:

• Relevant

• Reliable

• Discriminative

• Practical

Page 19: Unit 8 updated

Good Outcomes: RelevanceGood Outcomes: Relevance• Criteria relevance – Criteria relevance – extent to which

training programs are related to learned capabilities emphasized in the training program

• Criterion contamination Criterion contamination –– extent that training outcomes measure inappropriate capabilities or are affected by extraneous conditions

• Criterion deficiency Criterion deficiency – failure to measure training outcomes that were emphasized in the training objectives

Page 20: Unit 8 updated

Criterion deficiency, relevance, and contamination:Criterion deficiency, relevance, and contamination:

Outcomes Measured in Evaluation

Outcomes Identified by

Needs Assessment and

Included in Training

Objectives

Outcomes Related to Training

Objectives

Contamination Relevance Deficiency

Page 21: Unit 8 updated

Good Outcomes (continued)Good Outcomes (continued)

• Reliability –Reliability – degree to which outcomes can be measured consistently over time

• Discrimination –Discrimination – degree to which trainee’s performances on the outcome actually reflect true differences in performance

• Practicality – Practicality – the ease with which the outcomes measures can be collected

Page 22: Unit 8 updated

Training Evaluation PracticesTraining Evaluation Practices

Page 23: Unit 8 updated

Training Program Objectives and Their Implications for Evaluation:Training Program Objectives and Their Implications for Evaluation:

Reactions: Did trainees like the program?

Did the environment help learning?

Was material meaningful?

Skill-Based:

Ratings by peers or managers based on observation of behavior

Cognitive: Pencil-and-paper tests Affective: Trainees’ motivation or job attitudes

Skill-Based: Performance on a work sample Results: Did company benefit through sales, quality, productivity, reduced accidents, and complaints?

Performance on work equipment

Outcomes

Learning Transfer

Objective

Page 24: Unit 8 updated

Evaluation Designs: Threats to ValidityEvaluation Designs: Threats to Validity• Threats to validityThreats to validity refer to a factor that

will lead one to question either:– the believability of the study results

(internal validity)(internal validity), or– the extent to which the evaluation

results are generalizable to other groups of trainees and situations (external (external validity)validity)

Page 25: Unit 8 updated

Threats to ValidityThreats to Validity

Threats to Internal Validity

• Company• Persons• Outcome Measures

Threats to External Validity

•Reaction to pretest•Reaction to evaluation•Interaction of selection and training•Interaction of methods

Page 26: Unit 8 updated

Methods to Control for Threats to ValidityMethods to Control for Threats to Validity

Pre- and PosttestsPre- and Posttests

Use of Comparison Use of Comparison GroupsGroups

Random Random AssignmentAssignment

Page 27: Unit 8 updated

Methods to Control for Threats to Validity-ctd.Methods to Control for Threats to Validity-ctd.• Pretests and Posttests – to improve the

internal validity of the study results:– pretraining measure– posttraining measure

• Use of comparison groups– Hawthorne effect

Page 28: Unit 8 updated

Types of Evaluation DesignsTypes of Evaluation Designs

•Posttest – only

•Pretest / Posttest

•Pretest / Posttest with Comparison Group

•Time Series

•Solomon Four–Group

Page 29: Unit 8 updated

Factors That Influence the Type of Evaluation DesignFactors That Influence the Type of Evaluation Design

Factor How Factor Influences Type of Evaluation Design

Change potential Can program be modified?

Importance Does ineffective training affect customer service, product development, or relationships between employees?

Scale How many trainees are involved?

Purpose of training Is training conducted for learning, results, or both?

Organization culture Is demonstrating results part of company norms and expectations?

Expertise Can a complex study be analyzed?

Cost Is evaluation too expensive?

Time frame When do we need the information?

Page 30: Unit 8 updated

Importance of Training Cost Information - ROIImportance of Training Cost Information - ROI• To understand total expenditures for

training, including direct and indirect costs• To compare costs of alternative training

programs• To evaluate the proportion of money spent

on training development, administration, and evaluation as well as to compare monies spent on training for different groups of employees

• To control costs

Page 31: Unit 8 updated

To calculate return on investment (ROI), follow these steps:To calculate return on investment (ROI), follow these steps:1. Identify outcome(s) (e.g., quality,

accidents)

2. Place a value on the outcome(s)

3. Determine the change in performance after eliminating other potential influences on training results.

4. Obtain an annual amount of benefits (operational results) from training by comparing results after training to results before training (in dollars)

Page 32: Unit 8 updated

To Calculate Return on Investment (ROI), follow these steps: ctd.

To Calculate Return on Investment (ROI), follow these steps: ctd.

5. Determine training costs (direct costs + indirect costs + development costs + overhead costs + compensation for trainees)

6. Calculate the total savings by subtracting the training costs from benefits (operational results)

7. Calculate the ROI by dividing benefits (operational results) by costs

The ROI gives you an estimate of the dollar return expected from each dollar invested in training.

Page 33: Unit 8 updated

Determining Costs for a Cost-Benefit Analysis:Determining Costs for a Cost-Benefit Analysis:

DevelopmentCosts

OverheadCosts

Compensationfor

Trainees

Direct Costs Indirect Costs

Page 34: Unit 8 updated

Measuring Human Capital and Training ActivityMeasuring Human Capital and Training Activity• Expenditure per employee• Learning hours received per employee• Expenditure as a percentage of revenue• Cost per learning hour received• Percentage of expenditures for external services• Learning hours received per training and

development staff member• Average percentage of learning activities

outsourced• Average percentage of learning content by

content area (e.g. basic skills, customer service, executive development)

• Average percentage of learning hours provided via different delivery methods (instructor led, technology based)

Page 35: Unit 8 updated

What did I learn from here?