40
Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Unique Quality Control Issues

Derek S. ArndtOklahoma Climatological

SurveyJune 25, 2002

Page 2: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Automated QA Flags Decision-making algorithm compiles

results of automated QA tests Final flag (“good”, “suspect”, “warning”

or “bad”) determined by logic The final flag is never final! The Qualparm table represents the QA

Meteorologist’s latest and best assessment of observational quality for the given time

Automated report arrives in the QA Meteorologist’s inbox each morning.

Page 3: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Capturing Real Events With Automated QA Automated QA software is

invaluable as a front-line detector However, nothing beats the trained

eye and brain of a QA meteorologist

Sometimes, unique meteorological events fail QA tests and good data is suggested to be “bad”

Page 4: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Goodparms Goodparms reflect observations

that are known to be good, but have failed an automated QA test

In the next generation of OK Mesonet QA structure, Goodparm entries will override automated QA tests that have been “fooled” by Mother Nature

Page 5: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Noteworthy Goodparm Events The following examples of real

meteorological phenomena that were initially “flagged” by automated QA processes

Thanks to automated reporting, and a vigilant QA Meteorologist, these “bad” events turned out to be some of the network’s gems!

Page 6: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Inversion Poking Extreme spatial anomalies occur

Air temperature Dew point temperature / relative

humidity Wind direction Wind speed

Associated with shallow inversion and stable surface layer

Page 7: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Inversion PokingNorman, OK Sounding

25 Oct 20011200 UTC

Page 8: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Inversion PokingOK Mesonet Sfc Plot

25 Oct 20011330 UTC

Page 9: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Inversion PokingNorth Central OklahomaElevation (meters)

Page 10: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Inversion Poking 26 Oct 19990600 UTC

Page 11: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Cold Air Pooling Extreme temperature anomalies

develop due to radiational cooling Events tend to occur within a few

hours of sunset, suggesting in situ cooling (versus cold air drainage) Radiationally cooled air is prevented

from mixing

Page 12: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Cold Air Pooling 26 Oct 19990600 UTC

Page 13: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Cold Air Pooling East Central OklahomaElevation (meters)

Page 14: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Cold Air Pooling 4 Nov 19991215 UTC

Page 15: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesohighs Typically occur concurrently with

convective line or cluster May trigger spatially-oriented QA

tests May be a traveling QA

phenomenon

Page 16: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesohighs 1 Jun 19990235 UTC

Page 17: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesohighs 1 Jun 19990235 UTC

Page 18: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesohighs 1 Jun 19990236 UTC

Page 19: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesolows Typically located off the trailing

edge of convective precipitation May be a traveling QA

phenomenon

Page 20: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesolows 25 May 20000700 UTC

Page 21: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesolows 25 May 20000730 UTC

Page 22: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesolows 25 May 20000800 UTC

Page 23: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesolows 25 May 20000659 UTC

Page 24: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesolows 25 May 20000730 UTC

Page 25: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Mesolows 25 May 20000801 UTC

Page 26: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Heatbursts Originate from air that has subsided

dry-adiabatically from mid-levels of outwardly-innocuous thunderstorms

Downdrafts sometimes cause damaging winds and substantial temperature rises

Heatbursts occur much more often in Oklahoma than previously thought

Page 27: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Heatbursts 20 Sep 19981049 UTC

Page 28: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Heatbursts 20 Sep 19981148 UTC

Page 29: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Heatbursts 20 Sep 19981248 UTC

Page 30: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

HeatburstsAir Temperature

20 Sep 19981145 UTC

Page 31: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

HeatburstsWind Gusts

20 Sep 19981145 UTC

Page 32: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Heatbursts Mesonet Meteogram20-21 Sep 1998

Page 33: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Winter Precipitation Automated QA is quite good at

detecting wind sensors that accumulate ice and barometers that become sealed from the atmosphere (P ~ T at constant V!)

Unique conditions that accompany snowfall can sometimes lead to erroneous flags

Page 34: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Winter Precipitation Visible Imagery7 Dec 1999

Page 35: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Winter PrecipitationAir Temperature

7 Dec 19991000 UTC

Page 36: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Land-Atmosphere-Vegetation Soil temperatures are sensitive to

the characteristics of the soil and vegetation above them

Vegetation of surrounding land areas can impact temperature and dew point observations at a site

Page 37: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Land-Atmosphere-Vegetation

Page 38: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Land-Atmosphere-Vegetation

Page 39: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

Sloshing and Wave Events

Page 40: Unique Quality Control Issues Derek S. Arndt Oklahoma Climatological Survey June 25, 2002

That’s It!

Here’s to “bad” data!Best of luck to you and your network!

Derek ArndtOklahoma Climatological Survey

[email protected]