Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Bulletin of the JSME
Journal of Biomechanical Science and EngineeringVol.12, No.1, 2017
© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical EngineersJ-STAGE Advance Publication date: 15 February, 2017Paper No.16-00598
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
1. Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI), major cause of morbidity and mortality (Fault et al., 2010) , is associated with the
progressive neurodegeneration followed by extended or permanent loss of sensory, motor and/or cognitive function (Smith
et al., 1997; Adelson et al., 2000; Bramlett and Dietrich, 2002; Povlishock and Katz, 2005) and has a wide spectrum of
mechanisms of injury and pathologies. Main differences between the types of brain trauma were characterized under two
major categories, focal and diffuse brain injury, where focal brain injury is usually related with impact forces that may
produce cerebral contusions and hematomas, on the other hand, diffuse brain injury is dependent on the inertial forces
from rapid head accelerations/decelerations as well as the propagation of force through the brain after impact, usually
caused by traffic accidents, assaults and falls, that deform the white matter and eventually lead to diffuse axonal injury
(DAI) (Adams et al., 1989; Browne et al., 2011; Gupta and Przekwas, 2013).
The two distinct types of axonal pathology arising from DAI are the swellings that induced by the neurofilament
accumulation as a result of the damaged neurofilament structure in the axonal cytoskeleton and focal compaction and/or
impaired transport due to the mechanical insult (Povlishock, 1992) along the axons followed by secondary axotomy, and
the axonal bulbs which likely represent complete axonal disconnection (Chen et al., 1999; Smith et al., 2003a; Johnson et
al., 2013). These cytoskeletal abnormalities which proceed to the formation of the swellings and secondary axotomy are
the morphological indication of DAI whereas primary axotomy is a relatively rare event (Stone et al., 2004; Chung et al.,
2005; Kelley et al., 2006).
Therefore, DAI can be detected histologically by the visualization of the above mentioned morphological indication using
immunohistochemical labeling of multiple proteins which accumulates in injured axons (Gultekin and Smith, 1994; Ng et
al., 1994). Amyloid precursor protein (APP) is one of the strongest candidates amongst those proteins since it accumulates
in axonal swellings, and bulbs 2-3 h after brain trauma (Blumbergs et al., 1995; McKenzie et al., 1996) due to its
transportation by fast axonal transport and used as the indicative of impaired transport (Smith et al., 2003a; Suehiro and
Povlishock, 2001). Increased levels of tau protein accumulation, particularly in nonmyelinated axons of cortical
interneurons, serves as yet another example of a consistent TBI marker.
While most common injury cascades of TBI are recognized and summarized as cytoskeletal damage, calcium influx,
neurotransmitter release, and mitochondrial dysfunction, a standard treatment protocol has not yet been established
Uniaxial stretch-induced axonal injury thresholds for axonal dysfunction and disruption and strain rate effects on thresholds
for mouse neuronal stem cells
Abstract In this paper, the proposed study aims to achieve a better understanding of neuronal tolerance and contribute to the prediction of the secondary degeneration of diffuse axonal injury (DAI). Therefore, a uniaxial stretching device which subjected cultured neurons to uniaxial stretch was employed to evaluate the effect of strain and strain rate along axon to realize the injury threshold. Neurons differentiated from mouse neuronal stem cells were injured and the morphology was observed before and after stretching with strains of 0.10, 0.12, 0.18, 0.23 at strain rates of 8, 11, 19, 26 s-1 respectively. Results suggest that the threshold for axonal dysfunction is around 0.18 strain whereas the threshold for axonal disruption is around 0.23 and the results of strain rate effect investigations on axonal dysfunction and disruption around these threshold values indicated that higher strain rate values such as 50 s-1 may have diminishing effects on threshold for axonal disruption.
Key words : Traumatic brain injury, Diffuse axonal injury, Mouse neuronal stem cells, Uniaxial stretch
Evrim KURTOGLU *, Hiromichi NAKADATE *, Kazuhiro KIKUTA *, Shigeru AOMURA *
and Akira KAKUTA ** * Graduate School of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
E-mail: [email protected] ** Advanced Course of Mechanical and Computer Systems Engineering, Tokyo National College of Technology
1220-2, Kunugida-machi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193-0997, Japan
1
Received: 1 November 2016; Revised: 29 December 2016; Accepted: 7 February 2017
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
(Coronado et al., 2011). Moreover, although being the most common type of pathology in TBI with an approximately 40-
50% of occurrence rate out of the reported cases (Iwata et al., 2004; Meythaler et al., 2001), the diagnosis of DAI without
through histopathological examination, especially early or exact recognition of the extent of axonal injury, still remains as
a major challenge since these injuries are not promptly detectable with standard techniques such as computed tomography
(CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans as a consequence of the microscopic and disperse nature of the axonal
pathology of DAI (Adams et al., 1985; Diaz-Marchan et al., 1996). Thus, investigation of injury neuromechanics is crucial
in understanding neural tolerance and developing relevant therapies and/or diagnostic procedures for DAI. Applying the
defined levels of physiological injury must be realized through reliable and accurate models in order to assess the extent of
injury.
To the present, numerous in vitro models have been developed varying from using dissociated cells (Galbraith et al., 1993;
Cullen et al., 2007) to organotypic tissue slices (Cater et al., 2006) and from applying uniaxial (Pfister et al., 2003;
Nakadate et al., 2014) to biaxial strains (Nakadate et al., 2012; Sahay et al., 2002), to understand the mechanical stimuli of
the impact and the following responses of tissue and cells (Cargill and Thibault, 1996; LaPlaca and Thibault, 1997), and to
investigate the different aspects of DAI such as post-injury rise in calcium level (LaPlaca and Thibault, 1998; Rzigalinski
et al., 1997; Rzigalinski et al., 1998), electrophysiological responses of neurons (Galbraith et al., 1993; Tavalin et al.,
1995), neurofilament structure and formations of axonal swellings (Smith et al., 1999).
Although said in vitro models have provided some insight on understanding the cellular mechanism of neuronal injury, and
suggested that the degree of electrophysiological impairment and morphological damage of neurons is directly
related to the magnitude and rate of axonal stretch, the exact mechanisms that initiate secondary degeneration in DAI are
yet to be fully characterized. The neuromechanics of underlying pathways determining axonal injury is very complex
hence it is difficult to discern the mechanical principles that govern physical and functional tolerance. It is considered that
prediction of secondary degeneration resulting in DAI might be possible by quantifying axonal injury. In this study, axonal
injury induced by uniaxial stretch on differentiated mouse neuronal stem cells in order to clarify the relation between the
impulsive strain, strain rate and axonal injury. Herein, evaluation is performed by immunohistochemical labeling, with β-
APP and tau protein accumulation as biochemical markers of choice.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Uniaxial Stretching Device
The uniaxial stretching device consists of a servo actuator (RCS3-SA8C, IAI, Shizuoka, Japan), a servo actuator
controller (SCON-C; IAI), a linear sensor for measuring tensile displacement (LP-20F, Midori Precisions, Tokyo, Japan), a
load cell for measuring tensile loading (TCLS, Toyo Sokki, Kanagawa, Japan), a load cell converter (LC14111,
Unipulse, Tokyo, Japan), a programmable logic controller, an A/D converter unit (KV-3000 CPU, Keyence, Osaka, Japan),
an AC power unit (KV-U7, Keyence) and a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chamber which can be seen in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 The uniaxial stretching device and its components. The device consists of a PDMS chamber on a microscope stage,
a linear sensor, a load cell, a servo actuator and a wire. The PDMS chamber is clamped to the microscope stage at one
2
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
edge, and the other edge of the chamber is connected to the stainless plate those displacement is stopped by hitting the
stopper. The stainless plate is connected to the slider of the actuator through a wire and other tip of the wire is connected to
an iron piece. The iron piece is attracted strongly with the magnet set on the slider.
A detailed description of the device configuration and loading mechanism has been recently published (Aomura et al.,
2016). The Green-Lagrange strains of the culture substrate in the PDMS chamber were calculated by microscope images
before and after the stretching. The strains on the central point of the culturing substrate in the stretching direction and
perpendicular direction were obtained for every 0.5 mm displacement to 4 mm in total and plotted in Fig. 2A. In the
experiment, the compressive strain perpendicular to the stretching direction was smaller than 0.05 for the tensile strain
0.23 in the stretching direction at the maximum displacement with 4 mm.
Fig. 2 Displacement measurement of PDMS chamber: Strain and displacement of the culturing substrate fixed on the PDM
S chamber for the uniaxial stretching were observed experimentally. Relation between the forced displacement and distorti
ons around the center where cells are cultured was obtained. The strain in the direction perpendicular to the stretching dire
ction remains within 10% compared with the longitudinal strain (A). The displacement corresponds to the impact (strain 0.
10, 0.12, 0.18, 0.23 strain rate 8, 11, 19, 26 s-1
) is expressed as the function of time (B).
Strain rate was obtained by dividing the maximum strain by the time to maximum strain. The curves stood up in the first
10 msec by stretching, and converged in the last 10 msec by releasing with the same ratio as the standing up. It is expected
that the neuron on the substrate is stretched/compressed with a similar deformation history through the substrate.
2.2. Fabrication of the PDMS Chamber
The basic structure of the PDMS chamber with a well and a thin substrate is shown in Fig 3.
Fig. 3 PDMS chamber.
The base, a PDMS-prepolymer and the curing agent (SYLGARD 184 Silicone Elastomer Kit, Dow Corning, Midland, MI,
USA) were mixed in 10:1 mass ratio and the mixture was deaerated in a round desiccator connected to a dry vacuum
pump. The deaerated mixture was poured into a polystyrene square case and stainless mold to be 0.3 and 10 mm in
thickness, respectively, and was cured on a hot plate at 65°C for 1h. After curing, the two parts were bonded by the
deaerated mixture and cured at 65°C for 1h.
2.3. Cell Culture
Homogeneous mouse neuronal stem cells (NSCs) were produced via unidirectional neuronal differentiation from mouse
embryonic stem cells (ECSs) by using the neural stem sphere (NSS) method (Nakayama et al., 2003; Nakayama and Inoue,
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Dis
pla
cem
ent
[mm
]
Time [ms]
10%8s-1
12%11s-1
18%19s-1
23%26s-1
B
3
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
2006). NSCs were plated onto Matrigel (BD MatrigelTM
Basement Membrane Matrix Growth Factor Reduced; Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA) coated dishes and allowed to proliferate exponentially in proliferation medium (PM) consisting of
Neurobasal medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% Glutamax-I (Gibco), 1% penicillin-streptomycin supplement
(Sigma-Aldrich), 2% B-27 (Invitrogen) and 20 ng/ml fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis,
MN). The medium was replaced every 2 days. Then the cells were seeded into Poly-D-lysine and Matrigel coated culture
substrate (10 mm × 30 mm) of PDMS chamber at 5 × 104 cells/cm
2 and to induce differentiation of NSCs into neurons and
glia, PM was changed to differentiation medium (DM) consisting of Neurobasal medium supplemented with 2% B-27 and
10% astrocyte conditioned medium (ACM). Differentiation to NSCs from ECSs was confirmed by observing the
exponential increase in cell number, proliferation and differentiation into neurons and glia throughout the culturing
procedures (Shibata et al., 2016; Omori et al., 2014). The cells were cultured for 6 days and the medium was changed on
the third day of differentiation where differentiated cells can be seen in Fig 4.
.
Fig. 4 Fluorescent image of cultured neurons β-APP (Red) and Tau (Green) Merged.
The neurons matched in age to those subjected to strains were cultured in the PDMS chamber as a sham control, after
which they were set in and removed from the uniaxial stretching device without receiving any mechanical load. The
medium in the PDMS chamber was not removed during the experiment which was completed within 5 min. The
temperature of the device and surroundings were kept at 37°C. The PDMS chamber was returned to the CO2 incubator
after the experiment.
2.4. Immunostaining Analysis
A primary effect of dynamic deformation of axons following stretching is the disruption of axonal transport,
resulting in accumulation of transported materials in axonal swellings within just hours (Smith et al., 1999). Swellings
appear in a periodic interval along the connected axons, like beads on a string, to form a pathological phenotype referred to
as “axonal varicosities” (Rand and Courville, 1946). Axonal pathology found shortly after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a
single swelling at a disconnection point on an axon, described as a terminal “axonal bulb” (previously referred to as a
“retraction ball”) (Smith and Meaney, 2000; Smith et al., 2003b; Strich , 1956). In this study, β-APP and Tau were stained
at 3 h post loading and observed by using an inverted fluorescence microscopy (FSX100, Olympus, Japan) equipped
with a fluorescence mirror unit (U-MWIG3, Olympus). Cultures were rinsed with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered
saline (DPBS) with Ca2+
and Mg2+
and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature.
After permeabilization with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 5 minutes at room temperature, cultures were blocked with 5% goat
serum for 60 minutes at room temperature and incubated in rabbit polyclonal anti-β-APP (51-2700, Invitrogen, Life
Technologies) and Tau Monoclonal Antibody (TAU-5) (MA5-12808, Invitrogen, Life Technologies) at a dilution of 1:50
as the primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, 10 μg/mL Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L)
secondary antibody (A-11037, Molecular Probes, Life Technologies) and 10 μg/mL Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat
anti-mouse IgG (H+L) secondary antibody (A-11029, Molecular Probes, Life Technologies) were applied for 60
4
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
minutes at room temperature. β-APP and TAU accumulated axonal swellings and axonal bulbs formed after stretching
were observed and counted by fluorescent images as shown in Fig 5.
Fig. 5 β-APP & Tau immunostaining: Formation of bulb (left) and swellings (right). β-APP is shown in red (I), Tau in
green (II) and merged in yellow (III).
Dysfunction of the axonal transport was defined as the rate of neurons that have β-APP and Tau accumulated axonal
swellings. Disruption of the axonal transport was defined as the rate of neurons that have β-APPand Tau accumulated
axonal bulb. In addition, we evaluated the number of axonal swellings per 100 μm and the length of the axon in which
axonal bulb was observed, respectively. The axon length was measured manually by Image J (National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD, USA). Results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 4 independent experiments. 200–
300 neurons per a PDMS substrate were analyzed totally. Means were compared by Steel’s multiple comparison test. A p
value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
3. Results Cultured NSCs in PDMS chamber (Fig. 4) were subjected to impulsive strain of 0.10, 0.12, 0.18, 0.23 and strain rate 8, 11,
19, 26 s-1
respectively and the displacement profile of PDMS chamber under these impacts is shown in Fig. 2. 3 hours after
stretching, β-APP and Tau were stained to analyze the 2 most common pathologies of DAI; axonal swellings and axonal
bulb. Dysfunction of the axonal transport was defined as the rate of neurons that have β-APP and Tau accumulated
axonal swellings. Disruption of the axonal transport was defined as the rate of neurons that have β-APP and Tau
accumulated axonal bulb. β-APP and Tau accumulated axonal swellings and axonal bulbs formed after stretching were
observed and counted by fluorescent images as shown in Fig 5.
In order to clarify the relation between the impulsive strain, the strain rate and the axonal injury, first we focused on the
effects of the applied strain on axonal dysfunction and disruption separately.
As shown in Fig. 7, results suggested that the threshold for axonal dysfunction is around 0.18 strain whereas the threshold
for axonal disruption is around 0.23.
I II III
Stretch
ing
directio
n
directio
n
I II III
5
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
Fig. 6 Rate of neurons that have β-APP and Tau-accumulated axonal swellings (upper) and axonal bulbs (lower). The *
symbol represents a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) versus sham control at each condition using Steel’s
multiple comparison test. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 4 independent experiments.
Subsequently, the effects of strain rate on axonal dysfunction and disruption were investigated around the threshold values
which the above mentioned results indicated.
6
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
Fig. 7 Rate of neurons that have β-APP and Tau-accumulated axonal swellings (upper) and axonal bulbs (lower). The *
symbol represents a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) versus sham control at each condition using Steel’s
multiple comparison test. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 4 independent experiments.
Strain rate variations showed no significant influence on axonal dysfunction, however significantly affected axonal
disruption as can be seen in Fig. 8. Results suggested that higher strain rate values such as 50 s-1
may have diminishing
effects on threshold for axonal disruption.
4. Discussion
In this study, a uniaxial stretching device which subjected cultured neurons to uniaxial stretch was employed to evaluate
the effect of strain and strain rate along axon to realize the injury threshold in order to achieve a better understanding of
neuronal tolerance and contribute to the prediction of the secondary degeneration of DAI. Neurons differentiated from
mouse neuronal stem cells were injured and the morphology was observed before and after stretching with strains of 0.10,
0.12, 0.18, 0.23 at strain rates of 8, 11, 19, 26 s-1
respectively. First, the effects of the applied strain on axonal dysfunction
and disruption separately was studied where results suggested that the threshold for axonal dysfunction is around 0.18
strain whereas the threshold for axonal disruption is around 0.23. Similar injury tresholds were also suggested in several
previous studies (Bain and Meaney, 2000; Margulies and Thibault, 1992; Morrison III et al., 2003; Shreiber et al., 1997),
but to our knowledge, this is the first study that approaches axonal injury treshold for dysfunction and disruption
seperately.
Furthermore, the effects of strain rate on axonal dysfunction and disruption were investigated around the threshold values
which the previously mentioned results indicated. Strain rate variations showed no significant influence on axonal
dysfunction, however significantly affected axonal disruption. Results suggested that higher strain rate values such as 50 s-
1 may have diminishing effects on threshold for axonal disruption. Although there has been a few previous studies on the
effects of the strain rate on axonal injury (LaPlaca et al., 1997; Cargill and Thibault, 1996; Carter et al. 2006; Lusardi et al.,
2004; Geddes et al., 2003; Geddes and Cargill, 2001), this subject still merits more research effort since the researchers
still have not reached an agreement.
It is also vital to study these conditions on oriented axons since previous computational and experimental studies (Sahoo et
al., 2016; Wright and Ramesh, 2012; Nakadate et al., 2014) suggested that axonal injury thresholds strongly dependent on
the direction of axons since oriented axons on stretching direction are more susceptible to injury. However, the
strain/strain rate combinations analyzed in above mentioned studies are limited to determine axonal injury thresholds
accurately.
Indeed, studying the axonal injury thresholds for dysfunction and disruption with a wider range of strain/strain rate
combinations and also on oriented axons to have a better understanding on neuronal tolerance will be the future work for
this proposed study.
5. Conclusion
Neuronal injury is a widely observed, but difficult to study phenomenon since the neuromechanics of underlying pathways
determining axonal injury is very complex hence it is difficult to discern the mechanical principles that govern physical
and functional tolerance. The exact mechanisms that initiate secondary degeneration in DAI are yet to be fully
characterized. In this study, axonal injury induced by uniaxial stretch on differentiated mouse neuronal stem cells in order
7
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
to clarify the relation between the impulsive strain, strain rate and axonal injury. Herein, evaluation is performed by
immunohistochemical labeling, with β-APP and tau protein accumulation as biochemical markers of choice. Results
suggest that the threshold for axonal dysfunction is around 0.18 strain whereas the threshold for axonal disruption is
around 0.23 and the results of strain rate effect investigations on axonal dysfunction and disruption around these threshold
values indicated that higher strain rate values such as 50 s-1
may have diminishing effects on threshold for axonal
disruption.
Acknowledgment The authors gratefully thank Dr. Hiroyuki Omori at the Laboratory of Regenerative Neurosciences, Graduate School of
Human Health Sciences,Tokyo Metropolitan University for the gift of NSCs and his technical advice regarding cell
culture.This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (25289064) and a Grant-in- Aid for
Scientific Research (C) (26350509) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
References
Adams, J. H., Doyle, D., Ford, I., Gennarelli, T. A., Graham, D. I., Mclellan, D. R., Diffuse axonal injury in head injury:
definition, diagnosis and grading, Histopathology 15 (1989), pp.49–59.
Adams, J.H., Doyle, D., Graham, D.I., Lawrance, A.E., McLellan, D.R., Microscopic diffuse axonal injury in cases of
head injury, Med. Sci. Law. 25 (1985), pp.265–269.
Adelson, P.D., Dixon, C.E., Kochanek, P.M., Long-term dysfunction following diffuse traumatic brain injury in the
immature rat, J. Neurotrauma Vol.17, No.4 (2000), pp.273–282.
Aomura, S., Nakadate, H., Kaneko, Y., Nishimura, A., Willinger, R., Stretch-Induced functional disorder of axonal
transport in the cultured rat cortex neuron, Integrative Molecular Medicine, Vol.3, No.3 (2016), pp.654-660.
Bain, A. C., Meaney, D. F., Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system
white matter injury, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol.122, No.6 (2000), pp.615–622.
Blumbergs, P.C., Scott, G., Manavis, J., Wainwright, H., Simpson, D.A., McLean, A.J., Topography of axonal injury as
defined by amyloid precursor protein and the sector scoring method in mild and severe closed head injury,
Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol.12, No.4 (1995), pp.565–572.
Bramlett, H.M., Dietrich, W.D., Quantitative structural changes in white and gray matter 1 year following traumatic brain
injury in rats, Acta Neuropathol., Vol.103, No.6 (2002), pp.607- 614.
Browne, K. D., Chen, X. H., Meaney, D. F., Smith, D. H., Mild traumatic brain injury and diffuse axonal injury in swine, J.
Neurotrauma, 28 (2011), pp.1747–1755.
Cargill, R.S., Thibault, L.E., Acute alterations in [Ca2+
]i in NG108-15 cells subjected to high strain rate deformation and
chemical hypoxia: an in vitro model for neural trauma, Journal of Neurotrauma, 13 (1996), pp.396–407.
Cater, H. L. Sundstrom, L. E., Morrison, B. III., Temporal development of hippocampal cell death is dependent on tissue
strain but not strain rate, Journal of Biomechanics, Vol.39, No.15 (2006), pp.2810–2818.
Chen, X. H., Meaney, D. F., Xu, B. N., Nonaka, M., Mcintosh, T. K., Wolf, J. A., et al., Evolution of neurofilament
subtype accumulation in axons following diffuse brain injury in the pig, J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 58 (1999),
pp.588–596.
Chung, R. S., Staal, J. A., Mccormack, G. H., Dickson, T. C., Cozens, M. A., Chuckowree, J. A., et al., Mild axonal stretch
injury in vitro induces a progressive series of neurofilament alterations ultimately leading to delayed axotomy, J.
Neurotrauma, 22 (2005), pp.1081–1091.
Coronado, V.G., Xu, L., Basavaraju, S.V., McGuire, L.C, Wald, M.M., Faul, M.D., Guzman, B.R., Hemphill, J.D.,
MMWR Surveillance summaries: Morbidity and mortality weekly surveillance summaries, CDC, Vol.60, No.11
(2011), pp.1-32.
Cullen, D. K. Simon, C. M., LaPlaca, M. C., Strain rate-dependent induction of reactive astrogliosis and cell death in
three-dimensional neuronal-astrocytic co-cultures, Brain Research, 16 (1158) (2007), pp.103–115.
Diaz-Marchan, P.G., Hayman, L.A., Carrier, D.A., Feldman, D.J., Computed tomography of closed head injury,
Neurotrauma, R.K. Narayan, J.E. Wilburger, and J.T. Povlishock, (eds), McGraw-Hill: NY., (1996), pp.137–
149.
Faul, M., Xu, L., Wald, M.M., Coronado, V.G., Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits,
hospitalizations, and deaths, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention
and Control, Atlanta (GA), (2010).
Galbraith, J. A. Thibault, L. E. Matteson, R. A.. Mechanical and electrical responses of the squid giant axon to simple
elongation, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol.115, No.1 (1993), pp.13–22.
8
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
Geddes, D.M., Cargill, R.S., An in vitro model of neural trauma: device characterization and calcium response to
mechanical stretch, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 123 (2001), pp.247–255.
Geddes, D.M., Cargill, R.S., LaPlaca, M.C., Mechanical stretch to neurons results in a strain rate and magnitude-dependent
increase in plasma membrane permeability, Journal of Neurotrauma, 20 (2003), pp.1039–1049.
Gultekin, S.H., Smith, T.W., Diffuse axonal injury in craniocerebral trauma. A comparative histologic and
immunohistochemical study, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 118 (1994), 168–171.
Gupta, R. K., Przekwas, A., Mathematical models of blast-induced TBI: current status, challenges and prospects, Front.
Neurol., 4:59, (2013).
Iwata, A., Stys, P.K., Wolf, J.A., Chen, X.H., Taylor, A.G., Meaney, D.F., Smith, D.H., Traumatic axonal injury induces
proteolytic cleavage of the voltage-gated sodium channels modulated by tetrodotoxin and protease inhibitors, The
journal of neuroscience, 24 (2004), pp.4605-4613.
Johnson, V. E., Stewart, W., and Smith, D. H., Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury, Exp. Neurol., 246 (2013),
pp.35–43.
Kelley, B. J., Farkas, O., Lifshitz, J., and Povlishock, J. T., Traumatic axonal injury in the perisomatic domain triggers
ultrarapid secondary axotomy and Wallerian degeneration, Exp. Neurol., 198 (2006), pp.350–360.
LaPlaca, M. C., Thibault, L. E., An in vitro traumatic injury model to examine the response of neurons to a
hydrodynamically-induced deformation, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 25 (1997), pp.665–677.
LaPlaca, M.C., Lee, V.M.-Y., Thibault, L.E., An in vitro model of traumatic neuronal injury: loading rate-dependent
changes in acute cytosolic calcium and lactate dehydrogenase release, Journal of Neurotrauma, 14 (1997),
pp.355–368.
LaPlaca, M. C., Thibault, L. E., Dynamic mechanical deformation of neurons triggers an acute calcium response and cell
injury involving the N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor, J. Neurosci. Res., 52 (1998), pp.220–229.
Lusardi, T.A., Wolf, J.A., Putt, M.E., Smith, D.H., Meaney, D.F., Effect of acute calcium influx after mechanical stretch
injury in vitro on the viability of hippocampal neurons, Journal of Neurotrauma, 21 (2004), 61–72.
Margulies, S.S., Thibault, L.E., A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man, Journal of Biomechanics,
25 (1992), pp.917–923.
McKenzie, K.J., McLellan, D.R., Gentleman, S.M., Maxwell, W.L., Gennarelli, T.A., Graham, D.I., Is beta-APP a marker
of axonal damage in short-surviving head injury?, Acta Neuropathologica, Vol.92, No.6 (1996), pp.608–613.
Meythaler, J.M., Peduzzi, J.D., Eleftheriou, E., Novack, T.A., Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 82 (2001),
pp.1461-1471.
Morrison III., B., Cater, H.L., Wang, C.B., Thomas, F.C., Hung, C.T., Ateshian, G.A., Sundstrom, L.E., A tissue level
tolerance criteria for living brain developed with an in vitro model of traumatic mechanical loading, Stapp Car
Crash Journal, 47 (2003), pp.93–105.
Nakayama, T., Momoki-Soga, T., Inoue, N., Astrocyte-derived factors instruct differentiation of embryonic stem cells into
neurons, Neurosci Res., 46 (2003), pp.241-249.
Nakayama, T., Inoue, N., Neural stem sphere method: induction of neural stem cells and neurons by astrocyte-derived
factors in embryonic stem cells in vitro, Methods Mol Biol., 330 (2006), pp.1-13.
Nakadate, N., Fukumura, Y., Kaneko, Y., Kakuta, A., Furukawa, H., Aomura, S., In vitro uniaxial stretch model for
evaluating the effect of strain along axon on damage to neurons, Journal of Biomechanical Science and
Engineering, Vol.9, No.3 (2014).
Nakadate, H., Umahashi, H., Kakuta, A., Aomura, S., Progression to cell death correlates with neurite swelling
induced by stretch injury, Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.7, No.4 (2012), pp.406–415.
Ng, H.K., Mahaliyana, R.D., Poon, W.S., The pathological spectrum of diffuse axonal injury in blunt head trauma:
assessment with axon and myelin strains, Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg., 96 (1994), pp.24–31.
Omori, H., Otsu, M., Suzuki, A., Nakayama, T., Akama, K., Watanabe, M., Inoue, N., Effects of heat shock on survival,
proliferation and differentiation of mouse neural stem cells, Neuroscience Research, 79 (2014), pp.13–21.
Pfister, B.J., Weihs, T.P., Betenbaugh, M., Bao, G., An in vitro uniaxial stretch model for axonal injury, Annals of
Biomedical Engineering, Vol.31, No.5 (2003), pp.589–598.
Povlishock J.T., Traumatically induced axonal injury: pathogenesis and pathobiological implications, Brain Pathology,
Vol.2, No.1 (1992), pp.1–12.
Povlishock, J.T., Katz, D.I., Update of neuropathology and neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury, J. Head
Trauma Rehabil., Vol.20, No.1 (2005), pp.76–94.
Rand, C. W., Courville C. B., Histologic changes in the brain in cases of fatal injury to the head; alterations in nerve cells,
Arch Neurol Psychiatry, 55 (1946), pp.79–110.
Rzigalinski, B. A., Liang, S., McKinney, J. S., Willoughby, K. A., Ellis E. F., Effect of Ca2+
on in vitro astrocyte injury, J.
9
2© 2017 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
Kurtoglu, Nakadate, Kikuta, Aomura and Kakuta,Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, Vol.12, No.1 (2017)
[DOI: 10.1299/jbse.16-00598]
Neurochem., 68 (1997), pp.289–296.
Rzigalinski, B. A., Weber, J.T., Willoughby, K. A., Ellis E. F., Intracellular free calcium dynamics in stretch-injured
astrocytes, J. Neurochem., 70 (1998), pp.2377–2385.
Sahay, K.B., Mehrotra, R., Sachdeva, U., Banerji, A.K., Elastomechanical characterization of brain tissues, J. Biomech.,
Vol.25, No.3 (1992), pp.319–326.
Sahoo, D., Deck, C., Willinger, R., Brain injury tolerance limit based on computation of axonal strain, Accident Analysis
and Prevention, 92 (2016), pp.53–70.
Shibata, M., Otsu, M., Omori, H., Kobayashi, H., Suzuki, A., Nakayama, T., Kinoshita, M., Inoue, N., Effects of
continuous exposure of mouse primitive neural stem cellsto methylmercury in proliferation and differentiation
stages, The Journal of Japan Academy of Health Sciences, Vol.18, No.4 (2016), pp.187-199.
Shreiber, D.I., Bain, A.C., Meaney, D.F., In vivo thresholds for mechanical injury to the blood-brain barrier, Stapp Car
Crash Journal, 41 (1997), pp.277–291.
Smith, D.H., Chen, X.H., Pierce, J.E., Wolf, J.A., Trojanowski, J.Q., Graham, D.I., McIntosh, T.K., Progressive atrophy
and neuron death for one year following brain trauma in the rat, J. Neurotrauma, Vol.14, No.10 (1997), pp.715–
727.
Smith, D. H., Wolf, J. A., Lusardi, T. A., Lee, V. M., Meaney, D. F., High tolerance and delayed elastic response of
cultured axons to dynamic stretch injury, J. Neurosci., 19 (1999), pp.4263–4269.
Smith, D. H. and Meaney, D. F., Axonal damage in traumatic brain injury, Neuroscientist, Vol.6, No.6 (2000), pp.483–495.
Smith, D. H., Uryu, K., Saatman, K. E., Trojanowski, J. Q., and Mcintosh, T. K., Protein accumulation in traumatic brain
injury, Neuromolecular Med., 4 (2003a), pp.59–72.
Smith D. H., Meaney D. F., Shull W. H., Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma, J Head Trauma Rehabil, 18 (2003b),
pp.307–316.
Stone, J. R., Okonkwo, D. O., Dialo, A. O., Rubin, D. G., Mutlu, L. K., Povlishock, J. T., et al., Impaired axonal transport
and altered axolemmal permeability occur in distinct populations of damaged axons following traumatic brain
injury, Exp. Neurol., 190 (2004), pp.59–69.
Strich S. J., Diffuse degeneration of the cerebral white matter in severe dementia following head injury, J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry, 19 (1956), pp.163–185.
Suehiro, E., and Povlishock, J. T., Exacerbation of traumatically induced axonal injury by rapid posthypothermic
rewarming and attenuation of axonal change by cyclosporin A, J. Neurosurg., 94 (2001), pp.493–498.
Tavalin, S. J., Ellis, E. F., Satin L. S., Mechanical per turbation of cultured cortical neurons reveals a stretchinduced
delayed depolarization, J. Neurophysiol., 74 (1995), pp.2767–2773.
Wright, R. M., Ramesh, K. T., An axonal strain injury criterion for traumatic brain injury, Biomech Model Mechanobiol,
11 (2012), pp.245–260.
10