14
Understanding the Impact and Value of Esri’s Utility Network for Network Management Mike Chiasson, Pasadena Water and Power (PWP) Anil Jayavarapu, Avineon, Inc. Esri GeoConX 2017

Understanding the Impact and Value of Esri’s Utility ... · • 1,672 miles of Conductor • 771 miles of Conduit • 11,155 Poles – Load (370 mWPeak) ... – Process (~60% Automated

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Understanding the Impact and Value of Esri’s Utility Network for Network Management

Mike Chiasson, Pasadena Water and Power (PWP)Anil Jayavarapu, Avineon, Inc.

Esri GeoConX 2017

Presentation Outline

Pasadena Water and Power Esri’s Utility Network Proof of Concept• Electric System• GIS

• Technology Impact and Value • Business Impact and Value

• Scope and Objectives• Findings so far• Upcoming Webinar

Pasadena Water and Power• City of Pasadena

– Incorporated 1886– 23 square miles– Los Angeles County– 142,059 Residents

• Power System– 169 Circuits (34 kV, 17 kV, 4kV)

• 8,294 Transformers• 1,652 Switches• 1,672 miles of Conductor• 771 miles of Conduit• 11,155 Poles

– Load (370 mW Peak)• 66,026 Customers

• GIS – 50 Power Users (Desktop and Web)

Mike ChiassonGIS Coordinator

GIS’s Role at PWP

Electric SystemDesign & As-Built

Electric SystemOperations

Electric SystemAnalysis

WindMil®

DisSpatch®

Mapping & RecordsManagement

NO

W

Asset ManagementSystem

CASCADE

Field PortalCustomer Information

SystemOrcom

MMIS®

FUTU

RE Advanced Distribution

Management SystemEsri’s

Utility Network Smart MetersSensors

IoTDistributed GenerationReal-time GIS

Esri’s Utility Network

Advanced analysis of network

Modeling all components of the system

Representing dense areas

Data Integrity

Comprehensive views of the network

Higher performance

Robustness

TechnologyImpact & Value

Measurable Value

Customers

Investors

Employees

Software

HardwareData

Workflows

Impact

System of RecordSystem of Engagement

System of InsightsSystem of Actuation

Esri Utility Network

• Business Impact and Value– Typical GIS End User in the Field and Office

– GIS Editors and Data Administrators

– IT Support Personnel

Web access to all GIS functionality Device agnostic access

3D Maps and Diagrams will detail and connectivity Less number of field trips

Historical and Real-time Web Maps Fully transition to self-service

Advanced Network Analysis within GIS Structural, Electrical, Environmental

More out-of-the box functionality Less dependency on third-party

Reduced customization and integration efforts Lower cost-of-ownership

Transition to ArcGIS Pro Change in editing practicesMeasurable Business Outcomes

Utility Network: Proof of Concept

Scope• Washington Circuit (17kv)• Sierra Bonita Circuit (4kv)

Objectives• Gain a better understanding

– Data • Model Changes• Level of Detail• Migration Preparation

– Software Functionality• Data Editing | Data Analysis• Electrical Tracing• Feeder Manager | Conduit Manager• Data Exchange

Start Evaluating ChoicesChange Data Editing Practices

Redefine GIS Value PrepositionPrioritization of GIS Improvements

Step down Circuits15k Features

Proof of Concept: Data Model, Data, and Functionality1. Feature Classes Asset Groups/Types

2. Object Classes Asset Groups/Type

3. Domains Domains and Asset Type Domains

4. Fields Keep | Drop | Merge | Add

5. Relationships Relationships Associations (Connectivity, Structural, Container)

6. Current 2D Map and Schematics Future 2D Map, 2D Content, 2D Diagram Future 3D Map

7. ArcFM Configurations ArcGIS Pro/ ArcFM XI Stored Displays, Snapping Rules, Auto Updaters, QA/QC Rules Feeder Manager Conduit Manager

Choices &Decisions

Impact &Value

Gap Analysis

Asset Package Tailoring

Asset Package

Validation

Proof of Concept: Enhancing Connectivity in GISTransformer Vault- Transformer- Primary/Service Conduits- Bus and Air Duct- Thermostat Switch- Vault Lights- Disconnect Switch- Pumps- Manual Starter- Blower- Enclosure Drain- Grounding Rods- Manhole Opening- Vault Cover- Terminal Box

Esri Utility Network• 2D Map• 2D Container• 2D Diagram • 3D Map

Impact &Value

Proof of Concept: Details to model, view, and analyze in GIS

Level of Detail (LOD)2D/3D Utility Network

Structures Devices Lines

LOD 0 (Horizontal Footprint)

LOD 1 (Vertical)

LOD 2 (Outer Surfaces)

LOD 3 (Detailed Outer Surface)

LOD 4 (Interior)

Distributed Energy Resources (DER), Internet of Things (IoT), Augmented Reality (AR)• How much detail and connectivity to capture and view in GIS?

• 2D Map | 2D Container | 2D Diagram | 3D Map

Example CityGML

Proof of Concept: Modeling Electric System in GISMigrating to Utility Network – Above Ground

2D Map View

Now

2D Map Container View

Utility Network

3D Map View

Pole with two Transformer Units and Services

Proof of Concept: Modeling Electric System in GISMigrating to Utility Network – Below Ground

Now

Vault with Transformer, Switch and Services

Utility Network

2D Map View 2D Map Container View

Proof of Concept: Findings So Far

• Data Model– Around 80% Reduction in Feature Classes– Around 50% Reduction in Object Classes– Around 50% Conversion of Relationships to Associations

• Data Migration– At least 25% Increase in Content and Details and 40% Increase in Spatial Features– Process (~60% Automated Tools, 20% Semi-Automated/Manual, 20% YTD*)

• Software Functionality

Preparation Flattening Extraction Loading Post Processing

1 2 3 4 5

MappingSpreadsheet

* Based on Jun 2017 Utility Network Beta Release

Upcoming Webinar: 1 Hour

• Utility Network Proof of Concept– Live Demonstration (ArcGIS Pro and Utility Network Portal Widgets)– Comprehensive Findings List

• Data Model• Data• Software Functionality

– Opportunities and Risks– Recommendations

• Short and Long Term– Preparations – Next Steps

TuesdayNovember 14, 2017

10:00 AM Pacific

Mike ChiassonGIS Coordinator