Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Understanding Risk in AgricultureWHAT IS CAUSING RISK?
Contact InformationJerry L. HatfieldLaboratory Director National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment1015 N. University BlvdAmes, Iowa 50011515-294-5723515-294-8125 (fax)[email protected]
Crop Insurance ClaimsTop 2 insurance claims since 1989◦ Excessive moisture◦ Drought
Is it soil or climate?
Our Changing Climate
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Prec
ipita
tion
(in)
Illinois Precipitation: 1901-2010
30 Year Mean
Annual Mean
Min Limit
Max Limit
y = 0.0002x - 0.0201R² = 0.0082
y = -0.0002x + 0.7504R² = 0.0182
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Ratio
Year
Seasonal Annual: Total Annual Precipitation- Illinois
Spring
Summer
Linear (Spring)
Linear (Summer)
20082010
2011
2012 2013
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20
July
-Aug
ust P
reci
pita
tion
(inch
es)
May-June Precipitation (inches)
Spring and Summer Rainfall- Illinois
1895-1980
1981-2013
Dry SpringWet Summer
Wet SpringWet Summer
Dry SpringDry Summer
Wet SpringDry Summer
Extreme Precipitation
Climate trends Increasing precipitation
Shift in seasonality with more spring and more variable summer precipitation
Minimum temperatures are increasing more than maximum
Temperatures are increasing more in the winter than the summer
Rain into the soil Silt Loam Soil
Organic Matter (%)0 2 4 6 8
Day
s of
Ava
ilabl
e So
il W
ater
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Organic Matter (%)0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Avai
labl
e W
ater
Con
tent
(%)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Data Points Sand, AWC = 3.8 + 2.2 OMSilt Loam, AWC = 9.2 + 3.7 OMSilty clay loam, AWC = 6.3 + 2.8 OM
Hudson, 1994
Assuming an average rate of crop water use during the grain-filling period for corn
What are we doing to our soil?
Soil Degradation Spiral
Poor Land Management
Aggregation Degradation
Compaction& crusting
Water & Wind Erosion
Plant Growth Soil Biology
Yield
Reduced Soil Productivity
Paustian et al., 1997
Decrease in OM quantity& changes in OM quality
Soil Organic Matter Changes
Stable Soil SystemsLow Biological Activity High Biological Activity
Low stabilityHigh Stability
Slow infiltration, fast time to runoff
High infiltration,Delays runoff
Entrained material
Unstable microclimate
Stable microclimate StabilitySlow infiltration, fast time to runoff
Variation of Water Holding Capacity within production fields
Soybean Production FieldEarly August Late August
Yield variability in a field comes from soils inability to supply water during grain-filling
65 bu/acre
25 bu/acre
Crop Yield Variation
Good Soils = Good Yields
Mean NCCPI
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Cou
nty
Yiel
d (g
m-2
)
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
KentuckyIowaNebraska
Kentucky(Double crop)Y = 131.187 + 187.458X. r2 = 0.72***
Soybean yields across Iowa, Kentucky, and Nebraska
Climate resilience is derived from good soils in rainfed agricultural systems
NCCPI-AG
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mea
n C
ount
y Yi
eld
(g m
-2)
500
600
700
800
900
1000
KentuckyIowaY = 436.096 + 478.149X, r2 = 0.58***
Maize County Yields
Variation in NCCPI across the Midwest
Yield GapsIowa Maize Story County
Year1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Yiel
d (k
g ha
-1)
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Attainable YieldActual YieldYield Gap
Iowa Maize Story County
Fraction of Attainable Yield0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
uenc
y
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
We have found that 20% of the yield loss occur 80% of the time due to short term stresses, e.g., we needed an 2 inches but only received 1 inch of rainfall for the week so the plant is under a moderate stress and not fulling its yield potential
“Passive protective blanket” “Active protective blanket”
Role of residue on the soil surface
Stable Microclimate
Temperature profiles in the soil
Extremes in temperature limit the biological activity in the soil, induced by a dry soil
120-130 F85-90 F
Benefits of Using Cover Crops
Reduced erosion Reduced nitrate leachingReduced phosphorus lossesIncreased soil organic matterImproved weed control Support and maintain soil organismsImprove soil structure – especially no-tillGrazing and forage potentialRecycling manure nutrients
Mammals - gophers, moles, mice, groundhogsEarthworms - night crawlers, garden wormsInsects and mollusks - ants, beetles, centipedes, snails, slugsMicrofauna - nematodes, protozoa, rotifers≈Microflora - fungi, yeast, molds, mychorhizaActinomycetes - smaller than fungi, act like bacteriaBacteria - autotrophs, heterotrophs, rhizobia, nitrobacterAlgae - green, blue-green
The “living soil”, a biological system.
Earthworms, insects and rodents are “nature’s plow” and the most visible components of the “living soil” team. They work in tandem with other soil fauna, soil microorganisms and fungi to contribute to aeration and nutrient cycling as part of a “soil factory” team effort.
≈
Carbon Balance in Corn-Soybean Fields 2000-2016Rates(Mg C ha-1 yr-1)
Field Footprint
ΔTC -1.52 ± 0.78
-1.54 ± 0.76
C budget -1.70 ± 0.01
-1.72 ± 0.02
Current state of our soilsContinually lose carbon
Decrease the soil quality and infiltration rate
Increasing the potential for yield variation within fields
Increasing the risk of weather impacts on production
Soil Experiment – Laboratory
Evaluation of cover crop mixtures on changes in soil properties and gas exchange (CO2 and O2)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3/6/2017 0:00 4/25/2017 0:00 6/14/2017 0:00 8/3/2017 0:00 9/22/2017 0:00 11/11/2017 0:00
SOIL
O2(
kpa)
Soil O2
#3-Control #6-UAN #9-PB #12-PB #15-PB #18-UAN
RiskWe can reduce the risk due to weather and climate changes by increasing the capacity of or soils to cycle water and nutrients.
What do we knowOur weather is becoming more variable
Efficient crop production is dependent upon good weather and a good soil
We can manage the soil to increase climate resilience by increasing water availability and nutrient cycling
Enhancement is soil is only possible by enhancing and maintaining the soil biological system